Next Article in Journal
Novel Biomarkers of Hepatitis B Virus and Their Use in Chronic Hepatitis B Patient Management
Previous Article in Journal
BHK-21 Cell Clones Differ in Chikungunya Virus Infection and MXRA8 Receptor Expression
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/v13060950
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Global Distribution and Genetic Heterogeneity of Border Disease Virus

by
Cecilia Righi
,
Stefano Petrini
,
Ilaria Pierini
,
Monica Giammarioli
and
Gian Mario De Mia
*
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche “Togo Rosati”, 06126 Perugia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(6), 950; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13060950
Submission received: 4 May 2021 / Revised: 14 May 2021 / Accepted: 17 May 2021 / Published: 21 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Veterinary Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Border disease virus (BDV) belongs to the genus Pestivirus of the family Flaviviridae. Interspecies transmission of BDV between sheep, cattle, and pigs occurs regularly, sometimes making diagnosis a challenge. BDV can yield substantial economic losses, including prenatal and postnatal infections in lambs, which are the primary source of infection and maintenance of the virus in the population. Since BDV is antigenically and genetically related to bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), it might pose a significant risk to cattle, influencing BVDV eradication campaigns. Similarly, the presence of BDV in swine herds due to pestivirus spillover between small ruminants and pigs might cause uncertainty in classical swine fever virus (CSFV) diagnostics. Therefore, knowledge of BDV epidemiology in different geographical regions will help prevent its spread and optimize control measures. Previous epidemiological studies have shown that various BDV genotypes are predominant in different countries. This review provides an overview of the spread of BDV world-wide in different host species.

1. Introduction

Border disease virus (BDV) is an important pathogen of sheep, and occasionally goats, reported globally, responsible for congenital disorders, abortion, stillbirths, birth of weak lambs experiencing tremors, abnormal body conformation, hairy fleece, immunosuppression, and increased risk of other infections, incurring substantial yet underestimated economic loss to the livestock industry [1]. The first case of BDV infection was reported in sheep in 1959 from the border regions of England and Wales [2]. Its seroprevalence may vary from 5% to more than 90% among adult sheep, depending on the management of animal husbandry, while mortality depends on the timing of infection, virulence of the infecting strain, and the species or breed of the infected host [3]. Clinical manifestations are usually mild in acutely infected sheep; nevertheless, they may range from asymptomatic to clinically severe. In 1984, a high mortality BDV strain, the Aveyron strain, was isolated from sheep from the Aveyron region of France [4,5]. In 1997, a horizontal BDV outbreak, characterized by high mortality, with clinical signs similar to those of the Aveyron disease, was observed in lambs in a flock in northeast Spain [6]. In 2001, in the Central and Eastern Pyrenees, a fatal BDV epidemic occurred in chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) causing a dramatic decrease (over 80%) in the chamois populations that threatened the species with extinction [7,8,9].
BDV belongs to the genus Pestivirus, family Flaviviridae, which comprises four major species, namely bovine viral diarrhea virus type 1 (BVDV-1), type 2 (BVDV-2), classical swine fever virus (CSFV), and border disease virus (BDV), and a growing number of additional putative Pestivirus species from various domestic and wild animals. Recently, a revision of the taxonomy of the genus Pestivirus was proposed, and the original members were reclassified into 11 viral species named from A through K [10,11]. A number of unclassified pestiviruses have been identified in various bovine species (Pestivirus H, atypical ruminant pestivirus, or HoBi-like viruses) and of non-bovine species such as antelope (Pestivirus E, Pronghorn antelope pestivirus), pigs (Pestivirus F, Bungowannah virus; Pestivirus K, atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV)), small ruminants (Pestivirus I, Aydin-like pestivirus), and giraffes (Pestivirus G or Giraffe 1).
Current segregation of BDV field isolates from sheep and goats, and the designation of genotypes by genetic analyses indicate that BDV can be phylogenetically identified into at least eight genotypes, from BDV-1 to BDV-8 [12,13,14,15,16]. Other ovine pestiviruses have been identified that are responsible for BD-like syndromes, indicating a separate evolutionary history that forms distinct genetic groups. In particular, the Tunisian, Tunisian-like, and Aydin-like (Pestivirus I, Turkey) pestiviruses are phylogenetically closer to CSFV than to BDV [17,18,19,20,21]. Recently, a new emerging ovine pestivirus (OVPV), highly divergent from known pestivirus species, was found to be genetically and antigenically closely related to CSFV [22,23], and could be defined as a novel species. The occurrence of BDV infection in domestic and wild animals, mostly in sheep, has been confirmed in different countries world-wide, but most of the data comes from Europe.
Several studies have reported the adaptive plasticity of BDV to cross the species barrier and infect pigs [24,25,26,27] and cattle [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Moreover, BDV can be transmitted among domesticated species and from domesticated to wild species such as chamois, llama, alpaca, bison, and reindeer [28,39,40,41]. Table 1 shows the segregation of BDV genotypes detected according to their host origin.
Usually, transmission is due to direct contact with infected animals via the oronasal route. Vertical transmission via the placenta plays an important role in the epidemiology of the disease [54]. Recently, BDV was isolated from Melophagus ovinus, a blood-sucking ectoparasite of sheep, collected from the body surface of sheep in Xinjiang (China), emphasizing the potential role of Melophagus ovinus as a carrier of BDV [55]. Moreover, some authors have identified the European hare (Lepus europaeus) to be a potential wild reservoir of pestivirus for livestock, particularly associated with high mortality outbreaks in Pyrenean chamois [56].
Clinical signs also include the birth of weak lambs and persistent infections (PI) in newborns because fetuses are exposed to the virus with an immature immune system [3,57]. These PI lambs, usually those with the “hairy shaker syndrome” (longer and finer coat), are viremic, antibody negative, and shed virus all their life, becoming the main source of infection in a flock [14,58,59]. To control the spread and prevent the disease, it is important to identify and separate such animals so that they will not be bred or traded, along with implementing biosecurity measures.
Based on their effects on susceptible tissue cultures similar to BVDV, two biotypes can also be distinguished in the BDV species: cytopathogenic (cp), which causes vacuolization and lysis of infected cells, and non-cytopathogenic (ncp), which does not lead to microscopically visible signs of infection [60,61]. The ncp biotype is isolated much more frequently than the cp biotype [51,62]. The emergence of cp strains in PI animals is crucial for the induction of fatal mucosal disease which, however, occurs rarely in sheep [3,63,64,65].
Currently, there are no proven effective vaccines for BDV, although in the USA and some European countries, killed whole-virus vaccines have been produced but are not commercially available [57,66]. Occasionally, attempts have been made to use BVDV vaccines, but they are ineffective because the two viruses are antigenically related but yet distinct and, therefore, do not confer full cross-protection [67].

2. Genomic Organization of BDV

BDV is an enveloped virus with a spherical shape (40–60 nm), and its genome consists of a single-stranded, positive polarity RNA, composed of approximately 12,300 nucleotides. BDV is easily inactivated by heat, drying, detergents, and UV light [68]. A single open reading frame (ORF) of the BDV genome encodes four structural proteins, the capsid (C) and three envelope glycoproteins (Erns, E1, and E2), and seven to eight non-structural proteins (Npro, p7, NS2–3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B), which are flanked by 5′ and 3′ large untranslated regions (UTRs) [69,70,71]. Currently, only 15 complete BDV genome sequences are publicly available, representing each genotype, with the exception of BDV-6. The full genome sequence alignment displayed an intra-species similarity of 72.9% to 74.1% and 78.6% to 82.7% at nucleotide and amino acid sequence levels, respectively.
Pestiviruses were designated according to the host species, localization in specific tissues and organs, transmission route and symptoms of the disease, year of collection, and region of origin [72]. Nevertheless, these criteria were not satisfactory because there is extensive cross-reactivity and interspecies transmission among pestiviruses [12]. Subsequently, BDVs were identified by their genetic and antigenic relatedness to other viral strains and by the original host [10,14,39,57,73]. Previously, pestiviruses were phylogenetically characterized by comparing the 5′-UTR, Npro, and E2 gene sequences to classify new virus isolates. The 5′-UTR is the most conserved region of the viral genome, and the non-structural protein, Npro, codes for the N-terminal autoprotease that has no counterpart in other flaviviruses, whereas the E2 protein plays a major role in virus attachment and entry and is also important to induce neutralizing antibody production. To date, genotyping using 5′-UTR, Npro, and E2 sequences has provided consistent results to group isolates using phylogeny [12,15,45,74,75,76], and to define primers for identification and amplification of all pestiviruses by RT-PCR [77,78].

3. Global Distribution of BDV Genotypes

Several epidemiological studies have shown that BDV genotypes can affect a wide range of ungulates, but generally, sheep seem naturally sensitive to pestivirus infection. BDV infection is globally distributed and was reported in different European countries such as Austria [30,32,36,46,79,80], France [4,5,14,41,81], Germany [12,39,44,82,83], Italy [15,16,31,66,76,77,78,79], the Netherlands [24,28,84], Slovakia [85], Spain [1,6,7,9,13,27,48,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95], Switzerland [35,51,92,96,97,98,99], and the United Kingdom [3,12,33,72,100].
BDV has also been reported outside of Europe, in Australia [28,70,92], China [101,102], India [103], Japan [25,26], Mexico [37], New Zealand [34,42,72], Tajikistan [104], and the USA [43,65,105]. In North America, in the 1970s, a disease characterized by unthriftiness, hairy fleece, and tremors in fetuses and newborn lambs was reported in northern California [106]. Until then, no sequence data from North American ovine isolates encompassing the entire structural region of a “true BDV” were published, and it was not clear whether true BDV-like viruses existed in this part of the world. Several years later, Sullivan et al. (1997) [43] retrospectively analyzed the entire structural gene coding region of an ovine pestivirus named BD31, originating from the flock in California, and found that this pestivirus was in fact a “true BDV”. This was the only reported detection of BDV in North America until 2012, when another case of BDV infection was reported in California [65]. Similarly, there were no reports on BDV circulation in South America, despite the fact that BD-like syndromes were observed in some places (personal communications). It is likely that BDV is present in other European and non-European countries where the size and density of small ruminant population are sufficient to allow disease circulation. On the other hand, the owners of small ruminant flocks are generally unaware of the disease, mostly because the clinical symptoms are not strongly obvious; therefore, they often go unrecognized.
High seroprevalence from 30% to 98%, depending on the geographical area, was reported. Indeed, a number of epidemiological reports concern only the seroprevalence of BDV infection in many countries, such as Austria [46], Chile [107], Denmark [108], Iran [109], Iraq [110], Ireland [111,112], Israel [3], the Netherlands [84], Peru [113,114], Sweden [115], Switzerland [40,96], the UK [116], and Mediterranean countries such as Algeria [117], Morocco [118], Tunisia [119], and Turkey [19,120]. Nevertheless, only a few cases were confirmed by virus isolation or molecular characterization. Fihri et al. (2019) [118] have reported that genome and antigen absence in RT-PCR of samples of animals from endemic areas could be explained by partial or total destruction of viral proteins during sample handling, shipment, and storage, or could also be due to early death of PI animals.
Serology is an ineffective tool because of the antigenic similarity of BDV with other related pestiviruses and the cross-infection of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, and of some non-domesticated species. Indeed, BVDV and BDV are frequently detected in cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs, with low species specificity in serological tests. The transmission of pestiviruses between different animal species is often associated with common pasture or other forms of close contact between animals [1,13,14]. In such conditions, the virus can rapidly evolve by introducing mutations in the gene sequence that could lead to emergence and spread of new genetic variants.
Although it was virtually impossible to monitor temporal changes in the presence of genotypes in various countries, antigenic and genetic classification of isolates from different geographical regions is essential to improve knowledge on the epidemiology of BDV. According to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), the pestivirus species are demarcated using a range of criteria, including complete coding nucleotide sequences and deduced amino acid sequence relatedness, antigenic relatedness, and host of origin [10,12,73]. While some independent studies have analyzed the same BDV isolates with consistent results of segregation into genotypes, in other cases, the lack of standardization and the use of different genomic regions have led to conflicting results for some BDV isolates.
The systematic typing of the BDV isolates, based on the 5′-UTR, Npro, and E2 regions, led to the identification of eight phylogenetic groups (BDV-1 to BDV-8) (Figure 1).
The country-wise segregation of BDV isolates into genotypes is summarized in Table 2.
BDV-1, with putative subgroups BDV-1a and BDV-1b, and BDV-2, which consists solely of German isolates, were originally referred to as BDV-A and BDV-B, respectively [72]. BDV-3 is the most prevalent genotype in Europe, followed by BDV-1, which is prevalent world-wide; BDV-4, with probable subgroups BDV-4a and BDV-4b [1], originally referred to as BDV-C by Hurtado et al. (2003) [86], is predominant in Spain. BDV-5 and BDV-6 were first reported in France [14].
In 2005, the first member of a putative novel pestivirus group, an atypical pestivirus, was detected in Italy [49]. Further comparative analysis of small ruminant pestivirus sequences confirmed the evidence of the novel genotype BDV-7 [15,50], which is currently only detected in Italy. Interestingly, the near-complete nucleotide sequence so far available within this BDV-7 genotype (LR824489) showed an intra-species nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) p-distance slightly exceeding the values 0.24 and 0.15, proposed by Smith et al. (2017) [10] to be the genetic criterion for the demarcation of the BDV species, thereby placing the BDV-7 group slightly farther outside than the other BDV genotypes [121].
BDV-8 was subsequently reported by Peletto et al. (2016) and Caruso et al. (2017) [16,52], respectively, from a goat kid and a chamois in Italy, and by Peterhans et al. (2010) [51] and Stalder et al. (2017) [53] from cattle, sheep, and pigs in Switzerland. In the Npro genomic region, the sequences of the strains reported from Italy matched 82–92% (nt) and 86–93% (aa) to the corresponding region in the Swiss strains.
It is also noteworthy that Italy is the country where the highest number of BDV genotypes has been documented, indicating a greater genetic diversity of the virus compared to other countries. However, the data are insufficient to draw conclusions about the overall epidemiological situation of BDV infection, since data from countries in Central and Eastern Europe, Africa, and South America are still missing (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

4. Conclusions

In previous years, border disease often went unnoticed, as its symptoms, mainly related to fertility, rather than morbidity or mortality in animals, were not directly ascribed to BDV infection, and were sometimes confused with other pathogens, such as BVDV, Chlamydophila spp., Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., E. coli, and Corynebacterium spp. It affects reproduction, reduces growth rate, and hence delays slaughter in commercial conditions, yielding economic loss. Molecular investigations represent a useful tool to prevent and control the spread of disease, and to identify the changes in genetic characteristics of isolates by monitoring pestivirus strains in ruminants, particularly in mixed herds. Molecular epidemiology is instrumental in classifying novel viruses and studying their evolutionary dynamics. Phylogenetic analysis of BDV seeks to establish epidemiological patterns by tracing globally circulating virus isolates to individual countries. This improves our understanding of pathogenesis and infection routes, establishes genetic relationships between different isolates, and evaluates their temporospatial distribution in animal populations. Additionally, due to the spread and risks of BDV, and the challenges in controlling the disease, determining the antigenic relationship among pestivirus isolates plays a major role in diagnosis, planning immunization strategies, and controlling infection.
This review aimed to provide comprehensive knowledge on the variability of BDV and the genetic relatedness among circulating strains, thus avoiding inconsistent or conflicting allocation of BDV isolates into genotypes. At least eight different BDV genotypes, spread world-wide, have been described so far. It can be speculated that this genetic variability and the similarity observed among some viruses isolated from distant countries might be associated, at least partially, with animal trade.
While genetic comparisons are useful, the relationship between genetic and antigenic differences is largely unknown. This prompts the question on whether the genetic diversity of field strains can affect the diagnostics. Previous studies [12] have demonstrated even significant antigenic variations between BDV-1, BDV-2, and BDV-3 strains. Nevertheless, the criteria by which membership of one genotype is assigned rather than another do not necessarily correlate with the antigenic characteristics.
Locally, a flock management program should aim to identify and remove all PI animals from the flock, and prevent contact with or introduction of BDV-infected animals from outside. It would be imperative to only purchase from BDV-free flocks or isolate all newly purchased animals until they can be tested free of BDV.
The circulation of BDV may also substantially influence BVDV and CSFV eradication measures [25]. There is evidence that BDV PI sheep could transmit infection to cattle during close contact, for example, while sharing communal pastures. Additionally, since many tests used for the detection of BVDV antibodies do not differentiate between BVDV and BDV infection, this could pose risks and uncertainty to BVDV control programs. Therefore, small ruminants, particularly pregnant animals, should not be ignored in eradication programs for cattle, and it would be necessary to develop more specific diagnostic tests to detect all the ruminant pestiviruses and discriminate among them to detect BDV in both cattle and sheep. This is also applicable to swine herds, where BDV might be confused with CSFV in CSFV eradication programs, which may result in the unnecessary slaughter of large numbers of CSFV-free animals.
Genetic changes in the BDV genome can alter virulence, and novel ovine pestiviruses can emerge that could impact the epidemiology of the disease. Therefore, it is essential to study the genetic diversity and unequivocally designate BDV genotypes, considering that the heterogeneity of pestiviruses will probably increase in the future. In many geographical regions, BDV circulation is not yet studied, which is necessary to obtain a comprehensive epidemiological picture of BDV infections, especially in countries where sheep and goat rearing is traditionally an important source of income.

Author Contributions

C.R. and G.M.D.M.: conceptualization, original draft preparation, writing and manuscript revision, M.G. and S.P.: methodology, data curation, review and editing; I.P.: methodology, software. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data that support the findings of this study are openly available in NCBI at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Acknowledgments

We are most grateful to Denis Kolbasov (Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Pokrov, Russia) for providing valuable epidemiological information about the Russian Federation and Central Asia. We also wish to thank Eduardo Furtado Flores (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil), Federico Giannitti (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, La Estanzuela, Uruguay), Christian Mathieu-Benson (Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Región Metropolitana, Chile), Anselmo Carlos Odeòn (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina), and Andrea Pecora (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina) for their constructive comments on the epidemiological situation in South America.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Valdazo-Gonzalez, B.; Alvarez-Martinez, M.; Greiser-Wilke, I. Genetic typing and prevalence of Border disease virus (BDV) in small ruminant flocks in Spain. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 117, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hughes, L.E.; Kershaw, G.F.; Shaw, I.G. Border Disease. An undescribed disease of sheep. Vet. Rec. 1959, 71, 313–317. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nettleton, P.F.; Gilray, J.A.; Russo, P.; Dlissi, E. Border disease of sheep and goats. Vet. Res. 1998, 29, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Chappuis, G.; Brun, A.; Kato, F.; Dauvergne, M.; Reynaud, G.; Duret, C. Études Sérologiques et Immunologiques Réalisées à la Suite de l’Isolement d’un Pestivirus dans un Foyer Ovin chez des Moutons de l’Aveyron. In Pestivirose des Ovinset des Bovins: Nouvelles Connaissances, Utilisation pour une Stratégie de Contrôle, Journées Nationales de la Société Française de Buiatrie et de son Groupe d’Étudesur la Pathologie des Ovins et des Caprins (GEPOC); Espinasse, J., Savey, M., Eds.; Societe Francaise de Buiatrie: Paris, France, 1986; pp. 55–65. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vilček, S.; Leskova, V.; Meyer, D.; Postel, A.; Becher, P. Molecular characterization of border disease virus strain Aveyron. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 171, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vega, S.; Rosell, R.; Orden, J.A.; Pérez, T.; Marín, C.; González, S.; Marco, I.; Cabezón, O.; de la Fuente, R. Antigenic and molecular characterisation of Border disease virus associated with high mortality in lambs in Spain. Vet. Rec. Open 2015, 2, e000048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Arnal, M.; Fernandez-de-Luco, D.; Riba, L.; Maley, M.; Gilray, J.; Willoughby, K.; Vilček, S.; Nettleton, P.F. A novel pestivirus associated with deaths in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica). J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 3653–3657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marco, I.; López-Olvera, J.R.; Rosell, R.; Vidal, E.; Hurtado, A.; Juste, R.; Pumarola, M.; Lavin, S. Severe outbreak of disease in the Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) associated with border disease virus infection. Vet. Microbiol. 2007, 120, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marco, I.; Rosell, R.; Cabezón, O.; Mentaberre, G.; Casas, E.; Velarde, R.; Lavín, S. Border disease virus among chamois, Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, D.B.; Meyers, G.; Bukh, J.; Gould, E.A.; Monath, T.; Muerhoff, A.S.; Pletnev, A.; Rico-Hesse, R.; Stapleton, J.T.; Simmonds, P.; et al. Proposed revision to the taxonomy of the genus Pestivirus, family Flaviviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 2106–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. King, A.M.Q.; Lefkowitz, E.J.; Mushegian, A.R.; Adams, M.J.; Dutilh, B.E.; Gorbalenya, A.E.; Harrach, B.; Harrison, R.L.; Junglen, S.; Knowles, N.J.; et al. Changes to taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Arch. Virol. 2018, 163, 2601–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Becher, P.; Avalos Ramirez, R.; Orlich, M.; Cedillo Rosales, S.; Kosmidou, A.; Konig, M.; Schweizer, M.; Stalder, H.; Schirmeier, H.; Thiel, H.J. Genetic and antigenic characterization of novel pestivirus genotypes: Implications for classification. Virology 2003, 311, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Valdazo-Gonzalez, B.; Alvarez-Martinez, M.; Sandvik, T. Genetic and antigenic typing of border disease virus isolates in sheep from the Iberian Peninsula. Vet. J. 2007, 174, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dubois, E.; Russo, P.; Prigent, M.; Thiery, R. Genetic characterization of ovine pestiviruses isolated in France, between 1985 and 2006. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 130, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Giammarioli, M.; La Rocca, S.A.; Steinbach, F.; Casciari, C.; De Mia, G.M. Genetic and antigenic typing of border disease virus (BDV) isolates from Italy reveals the existence of a novel BDV group. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 147, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Peletto, S.; Caruso, C.; Cerutti, F.; Modesto, P.; Zoppi, S.; Dondo, A.; Acutis, P.L.; Masoero, L. A new genotype of border disease virus with implications for molecular diagnostics. Arch. Virol. 2016, 161, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Thabti, F.; Letellier, C.; Hammami, S.; Pepin, M.; Ribiere, M.; Mesplede, A.; Kerkhofs, P.; Russo, P. Detection of a novel border disease virus subgroup in Tunisian sheep. Arch. Virol. 2005, 150, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ciulli, S.; Purpari, G.; Agnello, S.; Di Marco, P.; Di Bella, S.; Volpe, E.; Mira, F.; De Aguiar Saldanha Pinheiro, A.C.; Vullo, S.; Guercio, A. Evidence for Tunisian-like pestiviruses presence in small ruminants in Italy since 2007. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 1243–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oguzoglu, T.C.; Tan, M.T.; Toplu, N.; Demir, A.B.; Bilge-Dagalp, S.; Karaoglu, T.; Ozkul, A.; Alkan, F.; Haas, L.; Greiser-Wilke, I. Border disease virus (BDV) infections of small ruminants in Turkey: A new BDV subgroup. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 135, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Becher, P.; Schmeiser, S.; Cigdem, T.; Postel, A. Complete genome sequence of a novel pestivirus from sheep. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 11412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Postel, A.; Schmeiser, S.; Oguzoglu, T.C.; Indenbirken, D.; Alawi, M.; Fischer, N.; Grundhoff, A.; Becher, P. Close Relationship of Ruminant Pestiviruses and Classical Swine Fever Virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015, 21, 668. Available online: www.cdc.gov/eid (accessed on 20 May 2020). [CrossRef]
  22. Sozzi, E.; Lavazza, A.; Gaffuri, A.; Bencetti, F.C.; Prosperi, A.; Lelli, D.; Chiapponi, C.; Moreno, A. Isolation and full-length sequence analysis of a Pestivirus from aborted lamb foetuses in Italy. Viruses 2019, 11, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Casciari, C.; Sozzi, E.; Bazzucchi, M.; Martin, A.M.M.; Gaffuri, A.; Giammarioli, M.; Lavazza, A.; De Mia, G.M. Serological relationship between a novel ovine pestivirus and classical swine fever virus. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 1406–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vilček, S.; Belak, S. Genetic identification of pestivirus strain Frijters as a border disease virus from pigs. J. Virol. Methods 1996, 60, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nagai, M.; Aoki, H.; Sakoda, Y.; Kozasa, T.; Tominaga-Teshima, K.; Mine, J.; Abe, Y.; Tamura, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Nishine, K.; et al. Molecular, biological, and antigenic characterization of a Border disease virus isolated from a pig during classical swine fever surveillance in Japan. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2014, 26, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kawanishi, N.; Tsuduku, S.; Shimizu, H.; Ohtani, Y.; Kameyama, K.; Yamakawa, M.; Tsutsui, T.; Matsuura, K.; Ohashi, S.; Isobe, T.; et al. First isolation of border disease virus in Japan is from a pig farm with no ruminants. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 171, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rosell, R.; Cabezón, O.; Pujols, J.; Domingo, M.; Muñoz, I.; Núñez, J.I.; Ganges, L. Identification of a porcine pestivirus as a border disease virus from naturally infected pigs in Spain. Vet. Rec. 2014, 174, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Becher, P.; Orlich, M.; Shannon, A.D.; Horner, G.; König, M.; Thiel, H.J. Phylogenetic analysis of pestiviruses from domestic and wild ruminants. J. Gen. Virol. 1997, 78, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cranwell, M.P.; Otter, A.; Errington, J.; Hogg, R.A.; Wakeley, P.; Sandvik, T. Detection of border disease virus in cattle. Vet. Rec. 2007, 161, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Krametter-Frötscher, R.; Benetka, V.; Möstl, K.; Baumgartner, W. Transmission of border disease virus from sheep to calves—a possible risk factor for the Austrian BVD eradication programme in cattle? Wien. Tierarztl. Monatsschr. 2008, 95, 200–203. [Google Scholar]
  31. Schirrmeier, H.; Strebelow, G.; Tavella, A.; Stifter, E. Border disease virus infection in cattle—Epidemiolocical and diagnostic impact. In Proceedings of the 7th ESVV Pestivirus Symposium, Uppsala, Sweden, 16–19 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hornberg, A.; Fernández, S.R.; Vogl, C.; Vilček, S.; Matt, M.; Fink, M.; Köfer, J.; Schöpf, K. Genetic diversity of pestivirus isolates in cattle from Western Austria. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 135, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Strong, R.; La Rocca, S.A.; Ibata, G.; Sandvik, T. Antigenic and genetic characterisation of border disease viruses isolated from UK cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 141, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. McFadden, A.M.; Tisdall, D.J.; Hill, F.I.; Otterson, P.; Pulford, D.; Peake, J.; Finnegan, C.J.; La Rocca, S.A.; Kok-Mun, T.; Weir, A.M. The first case of a bull persistently infected with border disease virus in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2012, 60, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Braun, U.; Reichle, S.F.; Reichert, C.; Hässig, M.; Stalder, H.P.; Bachofen, C.; Peterhans, E. Sheep persistently infected with Border disease readily transmit virus to calves seronegative to BVD virus. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 168, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Schoepf, K.; Revilla-Fernández, S.; Steinrigl, A.; Fuchs, R.; Sailer, A.; Weikel, J.; Schmoll, F. Retrospective epidemiological evaluation of molecular and animal husbandry data within the bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) control programme in Western Austria during 2009–2014. Berl. Münch. Tierärztl. Wschr. 2016, 129, 196–201. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gómez-Romero, N.; Basurto-Alcántara, F.J.; Verdugo-Rodríguez, A.; Lagunes-Quintanilla, R.; Bauermann, F.V.; Ridpath, J.F. Detection of border disease virus in Mexican cattle. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Braun, U.; Hilbe, M.; Peterhans, E.; Schweizer, M. Border disease in cattle. Vet. J. 2019, 246, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Becher, P.; Orlich, M.; Kosmidou, A.; Konig, M.; Baroth, M.; Thiel, H.J. Genetic diversity of pestiviruses: Identification of novel groups and implications for classification. Virology 1999, 262, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Danuser, R.; Vogt, H.-R.; Kaufmann, T.; Peterhans, E.; Zanoni, R. Seroprevalence and characterization of pestivirus infections in small ruminants and new world camelids in Switzerland. Schweizer. Archiv. für Tierheilkunde 2013, 151, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Martin, C.; Duquesne, V.; Adam, G.; Belleau, E.; Gauthier, D.; Champion, J.L.; Saegerman, C.; Thiéry, R.; Dubois, E. Pestiviruses infections at the wild and domestic ruminants interface in the French Southern Alps. Vet. Microbiol. 2015, 175, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vilček, S.; Bjorklund, H.V.; Horner, G.W.; Meers, J.; Belak, S. Genetic typing of pestiviruses from New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 1998, 46, 35–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sullivan, D.G.; Chang, D.J.; Akkina, R.K. Genetic characterization of ruminant pestiviruses: Sequence analysis of viral genotypes isolated from sheep. Virus Res. 1997, 47, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Giangaspero, M.; Harasawa, R.; Muschko, K.; Bǘttner, M. Characteristics of the 5′ untranslated region of wisent (Bison bonasus) and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) Pestivirus isolates. Vet. Ital. 2006, 42, 165–172. [Google Scholar]
  45. Giammarioli, M.; Rossi, E.; Casciari, C.; Bazzucchi, M.; Torresi, C.; De Mia, G.M. Genetic characterization of border disease virus (BDV) isolates from small ruminants in Italy. Virus Genes 2015, 50, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Krametter-Froetscher, R.; Kohler, H.; Benetka, V.; Moestl, K.; Golja, F.; Vilček, S.; Baumgartner, W. Influence of communal alpine pasturing on the spread of pestiviruses among sheep and goats in Austria: First identification of border disease virus in Austria. Zoonoses Public. Health 2007, 54, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rosamilia, A.; Grattarola, C.; Caruso, C.; Peletto, S.; Gobbi, E.; Tarello, V.; Caroggio, P.; Dondo, A.; Masoero, L.; Acutis, P.L. Detection of border disease virus (BDV) genotype 3 in Italian goat herds. Vet. J. 2014, 199, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Luzzago, C.; Ebranati, E.; Cabezón, O.; Fernández-Sirera, L.; Lavín, S.; Rosell, R.; Veo, C.; Rossi, L.; Cavallero, S.; Lanfranchi, P.; et al. Spatial and temporal phylogeny of border disease virus in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. De Mia, G.M.; Greiser-Wilke, I.; Feliziani, F.; Giammarioli, M.; De Giuseppe, A. Genetic characterization of a caprine pestivirus as the first member of a novel pestivirus subgroup. J. Vet. Med. 2005, 52, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Piras, I.M.; Dei Giudici, S.; Fadda, M.; Anfossi, A.G.; Oggiano, A.; Pittau, M.; Chessa, B. Distribution and Genetic Characterization of Border Disease Virus Circulating in Sardinian Ovine Flocks. Pathogens 2020, 9, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Peterhans, E.; Bachofen, C.; Stalder, H.; Schweizer, M. Cytopathic bovine viral diarrhea viruses (BVDV): Emerging pestiviruses doomed to extinction. Vet. Res. 2010, 41, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Caruso, C.; Peletto, S.; Cerutti, F.; Modesto, P.; Robetto, S.; Domenis, L.; Masoero, L.; Acuti, P. Evidence of circulation of the novel border disease virus genotype 8 in chamois. Arch. Virol. 2017, 162, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Stalder, H.P.; Marti, S.; Flückiger, F.; Renevey, N.; Hofmann, M.A.; Schweizer, M. Complete genome sequences of three border disease virus strains of the same subgenotype, BD Swiss, isolated from sheep, cattle, and pigs in Switzerland. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e01238-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Schweizer, M.; Peterhans, E. Pestiviruses. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2014, 2, 141–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, Y.H.; He, B.; Li, K.R.; Li, F.; Zhang, L.Y.; Li, X.Q.; Zhao, L. First report of border disease virus in Melophagus ovinus (sheep ked) collected in Xinjiang, China. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Colom-Cadena, A.; Cabezóna, O.; Rosell, R.; Fernández-Aguilar, X.; Blanch-Lázaro, B.; Tetas, E.; Lavín, S.; Marco, I. The European hare (Lepus europaeus) as a potential wild reservoir forruminant pestiviruses. Prev. Vet. Med. 2016, 131, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Oğuzoğlu, T.C. A Review of Border Disease Virus Infection in Ruminants: Molecular Characterization, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Control. Anim. Health Prod. Hyg. 2012, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yesilbag, K.; Alpay, G.; Becher, P. Variability and Global Distribution of Subgenotypes of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus. Viruses 2017, 9, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Menzies, P.I. Abortion in Sheep: Diagnosis and Control. In Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  60. Gillespie, J.H.; Baker, J.A.; McEntee, K. A cytopathogenic strain of virus diarrhea virus. Cornell Vet. 1960, 50, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Becher, P.; Meyers, G.; Shannon, A.D.; Thiel, H.J. Cytopathogenicity of border disease virus is correlated with integration of cellular sequences into the viral genome. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 2992–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Nettleton, P.F.; Entrican, G. Ruminant pestiviruses. Br. Vet. J. 1995, 151, 615–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Monies, R.J.; Paton, D.J.; Vilcek, S. Mucosal disease-like lesions in sheep infected with Border disease virus. Vet. Rec. 2004, 155, 765–769. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hilbe, M.; Camenisch, U.; Braun, U.; Peterhans, E.; Stalder, H.P.; Zlinszky, K.; Ehrensperger, F. Mucosal lesions in a sheep infected with the Border Disease Virus (BDV). Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk. 2009, 151, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Giannitti, F.; Barr, B.; Sverlow, K.; Thompson, M.; Crossley, B. Border disease resembling mucosal disease in a lamb (Ovis aries). In Proceedings of the ACVP Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, USA, 1–5 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
  66. Brun, A.; Lacoste, F.; Reynaud, G.; Kato, F.; Saint-Marc, B. Evaluation of the potency of an inactivated vaccine against border disease pestivirus infection in sheep. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Pestiviruses, Annecy, France, 1–3 October 1992; Edwards, S., Ed.; Fonda on Marcel Merieux: Annecy, France, 1992; pp. 257–259. [Google Scholar]
  67. Newcomer, B.W.; Givens, M.D. Approved and experimental countermeasures against pestiviral diseases: Bovine viral diarrhea, classical swine fever and border disease. Antivir. Res. 2013, 100, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Firquet, S.; Beaujard, S.; Lobert, P.E.; Sane, F.; Caloone, D.; Izard, D.; Hober, D. Survival of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses on inanimate surfaces. Microbes Environ. 2015, 30, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Collett, M.S.; Larson, R.; Gold, C.; Strick, D.; Anderson, D.K.; Purchio, A.F. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the pestivirus bovine viral diarrhea virus. Virology 1988, 165, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Becher, P.; Orlich, M.; Thiel, H.J. Complete genomic sequence of border disease virus, a pestivirus from sheep. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 5165–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Thiel, H.J.; Colle, M.S.; Gould, E.A.; Heinz, F.X.; Houghton, M.; Meyers, G.; Purcell, R.H.; Rice, C.M. Family Flaviviridae. In Virus Taxonomy; Eighth Report of the International Commitiee on Taxonomy of Viruses; Fauquet, C.M., Mayo, M.A., Manilo, J., Desselberger, U., Ball, L.A., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2005; pp. 981–998. [Google Scholar]
  72. Vilček, S.; Nettleton, P.F.; Paton, D.J.; Belák, S. Molecular characterization of ovine pestiviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1997, 78, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Simmonds, P.; Becher, P.; Bukh, J.; Gould, E.A.; Meyers, G.; Monath, T.; Muerhoff, S.; Pletnev, A.; Rico-Hesse, R.; Smith, D.B.; et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Flaviviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Schirrmeier, H.; Strebelow, G.; Depner, K.; Hoffmann, B.; Beer, M. Genetic and antigenic characterization of an atypical pestivirus isolate, a putative member of a novel pestivirus species. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 3647–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Simmonds, P.; Becher, P.; Collett, M.S.; Gould, E.A.; Heinz, F.X.; Meyers, G.; Monath, T.; Pletnev, A.; Rice, C.M.; Stiasny, K.; et al. Family Flaviviridae. In Virus Taxonomy; Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses; King, A.M.Q., Lefkowitz, E., Adams, M.J., Carstens, E.B., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 1003–1020. [Google Scholar]
  76. Giangaspero, M.; Harasawa, R. Characterization of genotypes among bovine viral diarrhea virus type 1 strains according to palindromic nucleotide substitutions in the genomic 50-untranslated region. J. Virol. Methods 2014, 195, 34–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vilček, S.; Herring, A.J.; Herring, J.A.; Nettleton, P.F.; Lowings, J.P.; Paton, D.J. Pestiviruses isolated from pigs, cattle and sheep can be allocated into at least three genogroups using polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis. Arch. Virol. 1994, 136, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stalder, H.; Hug, C.; Zanoni, R.; Vogt, H.R.; Peterhans, E.; Schweizer, M.; Bachofen, C. A nationwide database linking information on the hosts with sequence data of their virus strains: A useful tool for the eradication of bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) in Switzerland. Virus Res. 2016, 218, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Krametter-Froetscher, R.V.; Benetka, K.; Rasser, F.; Tockner, G.; Moesslacher, K.; Moestl, B.W. BVDV control program in Austria—Is a monitoring of BDV status in sheep in Austria necessary? Vet. Med. 2009, 54, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Krametter-Froetscher, R.; Duenser, M.; Preyler, B.; Theiner, A.; Benetka, V.; Moestl, K.; Baumgartner, W. Pestivirus infection in sheep and goats in West Austria. Vet. J. 2010, 186, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pioz, M.; Loison, A.; Gibert, P.; Dubray, D.; Menaut, P.; Le Tallec, B.; Artois, M.; Gilot-Fromont, E. Transmission of a pestivirus infection in a population of Pyrenean chamois. Vet. Microbiol. 2007, 119, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Avalos-Ramirez, R.; Orlich, M.; Thiel, H.J.; Becher, P. Evidence for the Presence of Two Novel Pestivirus Species. Virology 2001, 286, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Becher, P.; Shannon, A.D.; Tautz, N.; Thiel, H.J. Molecular characterization of border disease virus, a pestivirus from sheep. Virology 1994, 198, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Orsel, K.; Antonis, A.F.; Oosterloo, J.C.; Vellema, P. Van der Meer, F.J. Seroprevalence of antibodies against pestiviruses in small ruminants in the Netherlands. Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd. 2009, 134, 380–384. [Google Scholar]
  85. Leskova, V.; Jackova, A.; Vlásákova, M.; Vilček, S. Genetic characterization of a border disease virus isolate originating from Slovakia. Acta Virol. 2013, 57, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Hurtado, A.; García-Pérez, A.L.; Aduriz, G.; Juste, R.A. Genetic diversity of ruminant pestiviruses from Spain. Virus Res. 2003, 92, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hurtado, A.; Aduriz, G.; Gómez, N.; Oporto, B.; Juste, R.A.; Lavin, S.; Lopez-Olvera, J.R.; Marco, I. Molecular Identification of a New Pestivirus Associated with Increased Mortality in the Pyrenean Chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) in Spain. J. Wildl. Dis. 2004, 40, 796–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Berriatua, E.; Barandika, J.; Aduriz, G.; Atxaerandio, R.; Garrido, J.; Garcıa-Perez, A.L. Age-specific seroprevalence of Border disease virus and presence of persistently infected sheep in Basque dairy-sheep flocks. Vet. J. 2004, 168, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Berriatua, E.; Barandika, J.; Aduriz, G.; Hurtado, A.; Estevez, L.; Atxaerandio, R.; García-Pérez, A. Flock-prevalence of border disease virus infection in Basque dairy-sheep estimated by bulk-tank milk analysis. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 118, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Marco, I.; Rosell, R.; Cabezon, O.; Mentaberre, G.; Casas, E.; Velarde, R.; Lopez-Olvera, J.R.; Hurtado, A.; Lavín, S. Epidemiological study of border disease virus infection in southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) after an outbreak of disease in the pyrenees (NE Spain). Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 127, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Cabezon, O.; Rosell, R.; Velarde, R.; Mentaberre, G.; Casas-Diaz, E.; Lavin, S.; Marco, I. Border disease virus shedding and detection in naturally infected Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica). J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2010, 22, 744–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Giangaspero, M. Genetic variation of Border disease virus species strains. Vet. Ital. 2011, 47, 415–435. [Google Scholar]
  93. Marco, I.; Cabezón, O.; Velarde, R.; Fernández-Sirera, L.; Colom-Cadena, A.; Serrano, E.; Rosell, R.; Casas-Díaz, E.; Lavín, S. The two sides of border disease in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica): Silent persistence and population collapse. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2015, 16, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Marco, I.; Cabezon, O.; Rosell, R.; Fernandez-Sirera, L.; Allepuz, A.; Lavin, S. Retrospective study of pestivirus infection in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and other ungulates in the Pyrenees (NE Spain). J. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 149, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fernandez-Sirera, L.; Cabezon, O.; Dematteis, A.; Rossi, L.; Meneguz, P.G.; Gennero, M.S.; Allepuz, A.; Rosell, R.; Lavın, S.; Marco, I. Survey of Pestivirus infection in wild and domestic ungulates from south-western Italian Alps. Eur. J. Wild. Res. 2012, 58, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Schaller, P.; Vogt, H.R.; Strasser, M.; Nettleton, P.F.; Peterhans, E.; Zanoni, R. Seroprevalence of maedi-visna and border disease in Switzerland. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 2000, 142, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  97. Stalder, H.P.; Meier, P.; Pfaffen, G.; Wageck-Canal, C.; Rufenacht, J.; Schaller, P.; Bachofen, C.; Marti, S.; Vogt, H.R.; Peterhans, E. Genetic heterogeneity of pestiviruses of ruminants in Switzerland. Prev. Vet. Med. 2005, 72, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Braun, U.; Bachofen, C.; Büchi, R.; Hässig, M.; Peterhans, E. Infection of cattle with Border disease virus by sheep on communal alpine pastures. Schweizer Archiv. für Tierheilkunde 2013, 155, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Braun, U.; Hilbe, M.; Janett, F.; Hässig, M.; Zanoni, R.; Frei, S.; Schweizer, M. Transmission of border disease virus from a persistently infected calf to seronegative heifers in early pregnancy. BMC Vet. 2015, 11, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Barlow, R.M.; Patterson, D.S.P. Border Disease of sheep: A virus-induced teratogenic disorder. Adv. Vet. Med. Suppl. J. Vet. Med. 1982, 90, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
  101. Li, W.L.; Mao, L.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Sun, Y.H.; He, K.W.; Jiang, J.Y. Detection of border disease virus (BDV) in goat herds suffering diarrhea in eastern China. Virol. J. 2013, 10, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Mao, L.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; Yang, L.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, J. Characterization of one sheep border disease virus in China. Virol. J. 2015, 12, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Mishra, N.; Rajukumar, K.; Vilček, S.; Kalaiyarasu, S.; Behera, S.P.; Dubey, P.; Nema, R.K.; Gavade, V.B.; Dubey, S.C.; Kulkarni, D.D. Identification and molecular characterization of border disease virus (BDV) from sheep in India. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 44, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Anoyatbekova, A.M.; Alexeyenkova, S.V.; Yurov, K.P. Molecular-evolutionary genetic analysis of the Border disease virus detected in sheep in Tajikistan. Veterinariya 2017, 1, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  105. Ridpath, J.F.; Bolin, S.R. Comparison of the complete genomic sequence of the border disease virus, BD31, to other pestiviruses. Virus Res. 1997, 50, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Osburn, B.I.; Crenshaw, G.L.; Jackson, T.A. Unthriftiness, hairy fleece and tremors in newborn lambs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1972, 160, 442–445. [Google Scholar]
  107. Tadich, N.; Nettleton, P.F.; Morgan, K.L.; Hodgson, A.; Macaulay, R.; Reinhardt, G.; Riedemann, S. Seroprevalencia de Border disease en ovejerías del sur de Chile. Arch. Med. Vet. 1998, 30, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tegtmeier, C.; Stryhn, H.; Uttenthal, A.; Kjeldsen, A.M.; Nielsen, T.K. Seroprevalence of border disease in Danish sheep and goat herds. Acta Vet. Scand. 2000, 41, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hemmatzadeh, F.; Boardman, W.; Alinejad, A.; Hematzade, A.; Moghadam, M.K. Molecular and Serological Survey of Selected Viruses in Free-Ranging Wild Ruminants in Iran. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Hassan, S.D. Prevalence of border disease virus in sheep and goats in Mosul, Iraq. Iraqi J. V. Sci. 2021, 35, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Graham, D.A.; Calvert, V.; German, A.; Mc Cullough, S.J. Pestiviral infections in sheep and pigs in Northern Ireland. Vet. Rec. 2001, 148, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. O’Neill, R.G.; O’Connor, M.; O’Reilly, P.J. A survey of antibodies to pestivirus in sheep in the Republic of Ireland. Ir. Vet. J. 2004, 57, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Rivera, H.; Pezo, D.; García, W. Detección de anticuerpos contra pestivirus en rumiantes de una comunidad campesina de la provincia de Canchis, Cusco. Rev. Inv. Vet. Perú 2002, 13, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  114. Llancares, N.; Rivera, H.; Arainga, M.; Falcón, N. Seroprevalencia de pestivirus de rumiantes en ovinos reproductores de una empresa de la sierra central del Perú. Rev. Inv. Vet. Perú 2012, 23, 504–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Kautto, A.H.; Alenius, S.; Mossing, T.; Becher, P.; Belak, S.; Larska, M. Pestivirus and alphaherpesvirus infections in Swedish reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus L.). Vet. Microb. 2012, 156, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Paton, D.J.; Christiansen, K.; Alenius, S. Prevalence of antibodies to bovine virus diarrhoea virus and other viruses in bulk tank milk in England and Wales. Vet. Rec. 1998, 142, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Feknous, N.; Hanon, J.B.; Tignon, M.; Khaled, H.; Bouyoucef, A.; Cay, B. Seroprevalence of border disease virus and other pestiviruses in sheep in Algeria and associated risk factors. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Fihri, O.F.; Jammar, N.; Amrani, N.; El Berbri, I.; Alali, S. Sheep pestivirus in Morocco: Sero-epidemiological and molecular study. Vet. Rec. Open 2019, 6, e000324. [Google Scholar]
  119. Guidoum, K.A.; Benallou, B.; Pailler, L.; Espunyes, J.; Napp, S.; Cabezón, O. Ruminant pestiviruses in North Africa. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 184, 105156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ataseven, V.S.; Ataseven, L.; Tan, T.; Babür, C.; Oguzoglu, T.C. Seropositivity of agents causing abortion in local goat breeds in Eastern and South-eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Revue Méd. Vét. 2006, 157, 545–550. [Google Scholar]
  121. Bazzucchi, M.; Pierini, I.; Giammarioli, M.; De Mia, G.M. Near-complete nucleotide sequence of a border disease virus genotype BDV-7 isolate from Italy. Arch. Virol. 2020, 165, 3007–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 13 00950 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree showing the genetic relationship between pestivirus strains in the 5′-UTR. The tree was based on an analysis of partial 225 nt-long sequences. It was prepared using the MEGA v.7 program employing the maximum-likelihood method with the GTR+G+I substitution model. GenBank accession numbers of sequence data used are: BDV-1: X818 (AF037405), Moredun cp (U65022), Moredun ncp (U65023); BDV-2: Reindeer-1 V60 Krefeld (AF144618), Casimir (AB122085), Rudolph (AB122086); BDV-3: Gifhorn (EU636997), 90-F-6227 (EF693989), 90-F-6339 (EF693992); BDV-4: H2121 Chamois-1 (GU270877), VFMIII (DQ361071), Colm24 (DQ361073); BDV-5: Aveyron (KF918753), 89-F-5415 (EF693988), 85-F-488 (EF693985); BDV-6: 06-F-0299/369 (EF694001), 92-F-7119 (EF693994), 94-F-7446/1 (EF693996); BDV-7: 712/02 (AJ829444), LA/82/04 (FM163383), TO/121/04 (AM900848); BD-8: Italy-103761 (KT072634), BD35–15 (MF102262), R4785/06 (MF102260); Turkish: Aydin/04-TR (NC_018713), Burdur/05-TR (AM418428); Ovine pestiviruses: Ovine/IT/338710–2/17 (MK618725); Ovine/IT/338710–3/17 (MK618726); Ovine/IT/1756/17 (MG770617); Tunisian-like: 59434/2012/EN (KU856555), 70282/2007/EN (KU856551), 92019/2007/AG (KU856552); and Tunisian: BM01 (AY453630), SN2T (AF461996), SN3G (AY583306), 91-F-6731 (EF988632). Numbers indicate the percentage of 10,000 bootstrap replicates that support each phylogenetic branch. Bar: number of substitutions per site.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree showing the genetic relationship between pestivirus strains in the 5′-UTR. The tree was based on an analysis of partial 225 nt-long sequences. It was prepared using the MEGA v.7 program employing the maximum-likelihood method with the GTR+G+I substitution model. GenBank accession numbers of sequence data used are: BDV-1: X818 (AF037405), Moredun cp (U65022), Moredun ncp (U65023); BDV-2: Reindeer-1 V60 Krefeld (AF144618), Casimir (AB122085), Rudolph (AB122086); BDV-3: Gifhorn (EU636997), 90-F-6227 (EF693989), 90-F-6339 (EF693992); BDV-4: H2121 Chamois-1 (GU270877), VFMIII (DQ361071), Colm24 (DQ361073); BDV-5: Aveyron (KF918753), 89-F-5415 (EF693988), 85-F-488 (EF693985); BDV-6: 06-F-0299/369 (EF694001), 92-F-7119 (EF693994), 94-F-7446/1 (EF693996); BDV-7: 712/02 (AJ829444), LA/82/04 (FM163383), TO/121/04 (AM900848); BD-8: Italy-103761 (KT072634), BD35–15 (MF102262), R4785/06 (MF102260); Turkish: Aydin/04-TR (NC_018713), Burdur/05-TR (AM418428); Ovine pestiviruses: Ovine/IT/338710–2/17 (MK618725); Ovine/IT/338710–3/17 (MK618726); Ovine/IT/1756/17 (MG770617); Tunisian-like: 59434/2012/EN (KU856555), 70282/2007/EN (KU856551), 92019/2007/AG (KU856552); and Tunisian: BM01 (AY453630), SN2T (AF461996), SN3G (AY583306), 91-F-6731 (EF988632). Numbers indicate the percentage of 10,000 bootstrap replicates that support each phylogenetic branch. Bar: number of substitutions per site.
Viruses 13 00950 g001
Viruses 13 00950 g002 550
Figure 2. Global geographical distribution of BDV genotypes.
Figure 2. Global geographical distribution of BDV genotypes.
Viruses 13 00950 g002
Viruses 13 00950 g003 550
Figure 3. Geographical distribution of BDV genotypes in Europe and in the Mediterranean basin.
Figure 3. Geographical distribution of BDV genotypes in Europe and in the Mediterranean basin.
Viruses 13 00950 g003
Table
Table 1. BDV genotypes and other ruminant pestiviruses according to the host species.
Table 1. BDV genotypes and other ruminant pestiviruses according to the host species.
Genotypes of BDVHost Origin of Isolates Country of IsolationReferences
BDV-1Alpaca, llama, sheep, cattle, goat, pigAustralia, Germany,
Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Switzerland, UK, USA		[28,40,42,43]
BDV-2Reindeer, sheep, wisentGermany[12,44]
BDV-3Sheep, goat, cattleAustria, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Slovakia, Switzerland[14,31,45,46,47]
BDV-4Chamois, sheep, pigFrance, Spain [7,13,27,48]
BDV-5Sheep, goatFrance, Italy, Spain[6,14,45]
BDV-6Sheep, chamoisFrance, Italy[14,41]
BDV-7Sheep, goatItaly[15,49,50]
BDV-8Goat, chamois, sheep, cattle, pigItaly, Switzerland[16,51,52,53]
Turkey
(Aydin-like)		Sheep, goatTurkey[19]
Tunisian and
Tunisian-like		Sheep, goat France, Italy, Tunisia[17,18]
Ovine pestivirus SheepItaly[22]
Table
Table 2. Global distribution of BDV genotypes and other small ruminant pestiviruses.
Table 2. Global distribution of BDV genotypes and other small ruminant pestiviruses.
Country of
Isolation		Genomic RegionYear of
Isolation		Pestivirus DPestivirus IUnassigned PestivirusesReferences
BDV-1BDV-2BDV-3BDV-4BDV-5BDV-6BDV-7BDV-8Turkey
(Aydin-Like)		Tunisian and Tunisian-LikeOvine
Pestivirus
AustraliaE1, E219732----------[28,70,92]
Austria5′-UTR, Npro2003–2014--29--------[30,32,36,46,79,80]
China5′-UTR, Npro2012--4--------[101,102]
France5′-UTR, Npro1984–2010--72511---3-[4,5,14,41,81]
GermanyNpro, E1, E21985–2001161--------[12,39,44,82,83]
India5′-UTR, Npro, E22009–2010--1--------[103]
Italy5′-UTR, Npro2002–20183-7-11(*)142-34[15,16,18,22,23,31,45,47,49,50,52]
Japan5′-UTR, Npro, E220124----------[25,26]
Mexico5′UTR20163----------[37]
Netherlands5′-UTR19941----------[24,28]
New Zealand5′-UTR, Npro1990–20105----------[34,42,72]
Slovakia5′-UTR, Npro, E22007--1--------[85]
Spain5′-UTR, Npro, E21996–2011---835-----1[1,6,7,13,27,48,86,87,89,90,91,92,93]
Switzerland5′-UTR, Npro2001–20061-1----5---[35,51,53,92,97,99]
Tajikistan5′-UTR, Npro, E22017--1--------[104]
Tunisia5′-UTR, Npro1995–2000---------10-[17,92]
Turkey5′-UTR, Npro2004--------2--[19,20,21]
United Kingdom5′-UTR, Npro, E2, E11976–200828----------[12,33,72]
USA5′-UTR, Erns, E11978–20122----------[43,65,105]
Total Number506528511121472165
(*) Unpublished data, GenBank accession no. HG995106.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Righi, C.; Petrini, S.; Pierini, I.; Giammarioli, M.; De Mia, G.M. Global Distribution and Genetic Heterogeneity of Border Disease Virus. Viruses 2021, 13, 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13060950

AMA Style

Righi C, Petrini S, Pierini I, Giammarioli M, De Mia GM. Global Distribution and Genetic Heterogeneity of Border Disease Virus. Viruses. 2021; 13(6):950. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13060950

Chicago/Turabian Style

Righi, Cecilia, Stefano Petrini, Ilaria Pierini, Monica Giammarioli, and Gian Mario De Mia. 2021. "Global Distribution and Genetic Heterogeneity of Border Disease Virus" Viruses 13, no. 6: 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13060950

APA Style

Righi, C., Petrini, S., Pierini, I., Giammarioli, M., & De Mia, G. M. (2021). Global Distribution and Genetic Heterogeneity of Border Disease Virus. Viruses, 13(6), 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13060950

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop