Next Article in Journal
Orthopoxvirus Circulation in an Endemic Area in Brazil: Investigation of Infections in Small Mammals during an Absence of Outbreaks
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacteriophage Delivery Systems for Food Applications: Opportunities and Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Expanding the Repertoire of the Plant-Infecting Ophioviruses through Metatranscriptomics Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Broad-Spectrum Endolysin LySP2 Improves Chick Survival after Salmonella Pullorum Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 15
Issue 4
10.3390/v15040841
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of TaqMan Real-Time PCR Protocols for Simultaneous Detection and Quantification of the Bacterial Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and Their Specific Lytic Bacteriophages

by
Edson Bertolini
1,2,
Àngela Figàs-Segura
1,
Belén Álvarez
1,3 and
Elena G. Biosca
1,*
1
Departamento de Microbiología y Ecología, Universitat de València (UV), 46100 Valencia, Spain
2
Faculdade de Agronomia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil
3
Departamento de Investigación Aplicada y Extensión Agraria, Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario (IMIDRA), 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2023, 15(4), 841; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15040841
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 20 March 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2023 / Published: 25 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Roles and Applications of Phages in the Food Industry and Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ralstonia solanacearum is the causal agent of bacterial wilt, one of the most destructive diseases of solanaceous plants, affecting staple crops worldwide. The bacterium survives in water, soil, and other reservoirs, and is difficult to control. In this sense, the use of three specific lytic R. solanacearum bacteriophages was recently patented for bacterial wilt biocontrol in environmental water and in plants. To optimize their applications, the phages and the bacterium need to be accurately monitored and quantified, which is laborious and time-consuming with biological methods. In this work, primers and TaqMan probes were designed, and duplex and multiplex real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) protocols were developed and optimized for the simultaneous quantification of R. solanacearum and their phages. The quantification range was established from 108 to 10 PFU/mL for the phages and from 108 to 102 CFU/mL for R. solanacearum. Additionally, the multiplex qPCR protocol was validated for the detection and quantification of the phages with a limit ranging from 102 targets/mL in water and plant extracts to 103 targets/g in soil, and the target bacterium with a limit ranging from 103 targets/mL in water and plant extracts to 104 targets/g in soil, using direct methods of sample preparation.

1. Introduction

One of the most significant plant pathogens on a global scale is the bacterial wilt species Ralstonia solanacearum [1,2], as it produces disease in solanaceous crops basic for human nutrition such as potato and tomato, and ornamentals such as geranium [3,4,5]. The pathogen is soil- and water-borne, enters the plant through the roots, and infects vascular tissues, producing brown rot in potato tubers and lethal wilting in the plant [3,6,7]. Infection is related to many factors; among them, an unusually high number of virulence and pathogenicity determinants [8,9,10,11]. R. solanacearum is originally from tropical and subtropical areas but it can also survive in temperate climates. It is a quarantine bacterium in the European Union (EU), the USA, and Canada, and a Select Agent in the USA [12,13,14]. Following epidemic outbreaks, R. solanacearum can persist for variable periods in watercourses, soils, and other reservoirs in the absence of the host [3,4,15,16,17,18], and despite the exposure to environmental stress, without losing virulence [17,18]. The endurance of the bacterium points out potential for dissemination and colonization of new geographical and climatic areas. In environmental water, R. solanacearum cells resuscitated after just a favorable temperature upshift [18], which makes spread of the pathogen an ever-increasing threat under global warming conditions.
The presence of R. solanacearum in the environment constitutes a risk to sensitive crops, most of which are irrigated. In fact, the origin of many bacterial wilt outbreaks has been linked to contact with R. solanacearum-contaminated water [16,18,19], which is one of the main pathways for the introduction of the pathogen to new areas. The great ability for survival of R. solanacearum in aquatic habitats and the fact that water is an increasingly scarce essential resource [20], together with the lack of effective and/or environmentally friendly chemical control methods either in water or in the field, constitute a problem for farmers and agricultural production of susceptible crops in affected areas. To overcome this issue, and in agreement with the growing social awareness for a healthy environment and a demand for safe food, the interest has been focused on alternative bacterial wilt biological control methods [21,22]. In this sense, the use of lytic bacteriophages (phages) has the advantage of specifically targeting the bacterial host cell, allowing for maintenance of sustainable agroecosystems. In recent years, three phages with specific lytic activity against R. solanacearum were isolated from environmental water from different locations in Spain. They were characterized, named vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and their efficacy to biocontrol the pathogen populations in environmental water and in planta was demonstrated for all of them and their combinations in laboratory assays, and patented [23,24,25,26,27]. The three phages constituted the first European phages isolated against R. solanacearum, and their genomic characterization allowed their classification in a novel species of the genus Gyeongsanvirus within the Autographiviridae family, as well as confirmation of their suitability as safe biocontrol agents [28]. Although first steps were taken towards their conservation with a view to their commercialization [27], there are still some unknown data concerning their applications in the field, especially when a mixture of the phages is used, which require the precise monitoring and quantification of the three phages and the target bacterium.
To date, the time course of phage–host dynamics in liquid medium is most frequently monitored based on optical density measurements of the loss of turbidity from an initial bacterial host suspension due to the lytic activity of a phage or a mixture of phages. To link these optical density data to quantification of host and phage populations, parallel counting on solid medium is usually performed by both direct plating and a standard double-layer plating, respectively, for the host bacterium and the phage or phages, at each sampling time [29,30,31,32]. This is laborious and time-consuming, and the efficiency mainly depends on several factors, such as the type of plaque, the target bacterium, and the culture medium [31]. Some other inconveniences consist of the difficulty to quantify bacterial hosts and phages in very short periods, especially when different experimental conditions are running simultaneously, and the inability to quantitatively differentiate each phage in a mixture, as well as host and phages in non-sterile conditions, such as environmental water, soil suspensions, or plant extracts. In contrast, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) has proven to be an accurate, reproducible, rapid, simple, and useful alternative, allowing for individual quantification of multiple bacteria and phages in mixed cultures [31,32,33,34]. With respect to R. solanacearum, several real-time qPCR protocols have been described [35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. However, no real-time qPCR protocol has been developed so far for phages with specific lytic activity against R. solanacearum. In this regard, in the present work, specific primers and TaqMan probes have been designed to develop two real-time qPCR protocols: a duplex qPCR for the simultaneous detection and quantification of the three patented R. solanacearum phages, vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and the target bacterium, and a multiplex qPCR for detection of the three phages, the individual vRsoP-WR2 phage, and the target bacterium. Additionally, the multiplex real-time qPCR protocol has been validated for the detection and quantification of the three R. solanacearum phages and the target bacterium in water, soil, and plant material, mimicking samples taken under field conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterium, Phages, and Growth Conditions

The strain CFBP 4944 of R. solanacearum isolated from potatoes in Spain [19,26] was the bacterial host in all phage assays. It was cultured on the general media casamino acids peptone glucose (CPG) [42] or Luria Bertani (LB) [43], with 1.5% bacteriological agar (CPGA or LBA), for 48 h at 28 °C. LB broth (LBB) was used for overnight cultures of the bacterial strain at 28 °C with aeration by shaking at 120 rpm. R. solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, further characterized by Biosca et al. [28], were used in this work. They were propagated on R. solanacearum cultures similarly to Álvarez et al. [26], with minor modifications. Briefly, the host strain was grown in LBB overnight at 28 °C and 120 rpm. Thereafter, the bacterial cell concentration was adjusted to an OD600 nm = 0.5, equivalent to about 108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL, using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Genesys 20, Waltham, MA, USA). Afterwards, 0.1 mL of 0.22 μm-filtered lysates were added to 5 mL of adjusted bacterial suspensions and the mixture was incubated overnight at 28 °C with shaking at 120 rpm. Phage titers were determined according to [27] by performing serial 10-fold dilutions of each phage lysate (0.22 μm-filtered lysates) in SM buffer [44] and the double-layer agar method. Thus, 0.2 mL aliquots of the bacterial culture (adjusted to an OD600 nm = 0.5) were mixed with 0.1 mL of each phage dilution and 5 mL of soft agar (0.6%) medium, poured onto CPGA plates, and incubated at 28 °C for 48 h. After incubation, the plaque-forming units (PFU) were observed. Phage suspensions were maintained for short periods at 4 °C.

2.2. Plant Material and Environmental Samples

Tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cultivar (cv.) Roma, susceptible to R. solanacearum but free of the pathogen, were grown 3–4 weeks in TEKU: PL3040/20 and vermicoco (cocopeat) 100% in jiffis at 20–25 °C during the daytime and 18–20 °C during the nighttime, under greenhouse conditions at the Vegetal Production Unit of the Central Service for Experimental Research (SCSIE) at the Universitat de València (UV). Plant extracts were prepared by crushing 0.5 g of tomato plant stems in 4.5 mL of Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) at 10 mM, pH 7.2, and then filtering the extract to prepare R. solanacearum-spiked samples, as indicated in Section 2.3.
Soil samples from a tomato field and river water from R. solanacearum-free areas in the southeast of Spain were used to prepare R. solanacearum-spiked samples, as indicated in Section 2.3.

2.3. Bacterial and Phage Dilutions, and DNA Purification

Suspensions of 109 PFU/mL of the mix of the three phages and 109 CFU/mL of R. solanacearum were performed in PBS at 10 mM, pH 7.2, separately. Serial dilutions of 108 to 1 PFU/mL of the phages and 108 to 1 CFU/mL of the bacterium were performed in PBS and in river water, with extract of tomato plants cv. Roma and soil from pathogen-free samples. For direct amplification (without DNA purification), each dilution performed above was further diluted 100-fold in PBS. Total DNA was extracted from each dilution of all samples using the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method [45]. DNA concentration and quality were determined spectrophotometrically at 260 nm and 280 nm with a Nanodrop (ND-2000, Thermo Fisher, Wilmington, DE, USA).

2.4. Design of Primers and Probes

To design appropriate primers and probes, the nucleotide sequences deposited in GenBank of complete genomes of the phages vRsoP-WF2 (MN685189), vRsoP-WM2 (MN685190), and vRsoP-WR2 (MN685191) were used. Alignments of the nucleotide sequences of the phages were carried out using Blast tools from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Geneious Prime v2023.0.1 software. Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to obtain the sequences of specific primers and TaqMan probes of R. solanacearum phages. In addition, primers and TaqMan probes specific for phage vRsoP-WR2 were designed based on the insertion of 480 bp present in their nucleotide sequence [28].
The primers B2-I-F/B2-II-R and the TaqMan probe B2-P specific to strains of R. solanacearum Phylotype IIB-1 (race 3, biovar 2) were described by Fegan et al. [46] and Weller et al. [35] and recommended in the EPPO Standard for R. solanacearum detection [47] (Table 1). The TaqMan probe of R. solanacearum was labeled in 5′ with fluorescent dye HEX and 3′ with quencher (IABkFQ).

2.5. Quantitative Duplex PCR

TaqMan assays for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) were performed in the StepOne Plus Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) at the Genomics Unit of the SCSIE at the UV. The individual reaction cocktail in a final volume of 10 μL contained 1X TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 1 μM of each primer, 150 nM of TaqMan probe, and 2 μL of sample. The duplex reaction cocktail contained 1X TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 1 μM of each primer for the phages and for the bacterium, 150 nM of TaqMan probe for the phages and for the bacterium, and 2 μL of sample. Real-time PCR amplification consisted of one step at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min). Data acquisition and analysis were performed with the StepOne software v2.3. The default threshold set by the machine was slightly adjusted above the noise to the linear part of the growth curve, at its narrowest point, according to the StepOne manufacturers (Applied Biosystems).

2.6. Quantitative Multiplex PCR

TaqMan assays for multiplex qPCR were performed in a QuantStudio 5 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) at the Central Unit for Research in Medicine (UCIM) at the UV. The reaction cocktail in a final volume of 10 μL contained 1X TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.75 μM of each primer for phage vRsoP-WR2, 0.75 μM of each universal primer for the three phages, 0.75 μM of each primer for the bacterium, 150 nM of each TaqMan probe, and 2 μL of sample. Real-time multiplex PCR amplification consisted of one step at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min). Data acquisition and analysis were performed with QuantStudio Design and Analysis software v1.5.1. The default threshold set by the machine was slightly adjusted above the noise to the linear part of the growth curve, at its narrowest point according to the manufacturers (Applied Biosystems). To determine the theoretical sensitivity and the reliability of the multiplex real-time PCR for each sample type, three replicates of each assay were undertaken using the ten-fold serial dilutions of the single phage and the single bacterium, and the phage plus bacterium mixture.
A summarization of the development of the TaqMan qPCR protocols for specific DNA detection and quantification of R. solanacearum and the phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and their applications, is represented in Figure 1.

3. Results

3.1. Specificity of PCR of R. solanacearum Phages

The primers WFMR2 F, WFMR2 R, and TaqMan probe WFMR2 P (Table 1; Figure 2A) were designed in ORF 52–53 (phage terminase small subunit) [28] and were able to specifically amplify the three R. solanacearum phages tested, vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2. No amplification was obtained from R. solanacearum suspensions, nor from pathogen-free samples of river water, tomato plants, and soil used as controls. The primers WR2 F, WR2 R, and TaqMan probe WR2 P (Table 1; Figure 2B) were designed in ORF 17 (phage-restriction endonuclease) [28] and were able to specifically amplify the vRsoP-WR2 R. solanacearum phage. No amplification was obtained from phages vRsoP-WF2 and vRsoP-WM2, R. solanacearum suspensions, nor from pathogen-free samples of river water, tomato plants, and soil used as controls. In vitro assays confirmed the previous in silico specificity analysis performed with the sequences of the phages retrieved from databases.

3.2. qPCR Standard Curves for Quantification of R. solanacearum Phages and Bacterium

The quantification range of duplex PCR was established from 108 to 10 PFU/mL of R. solanacearum phages and from 108 to 102 CFU/mL of R. solanacearum due to the reliability of three replicates (Figure 3).
The Ct value for the standard curve of the phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 ranged from 10.42 to 33.07 for 108 to 10 PFU, respectively. The mathematical equation that represents the curve is: y = 3.321x + 36.916, with a correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.9987. For quantitation of vRsoP-WR2 phage particles only, with the cocktail of duplex PCR, the same mathematical coefficients were obtained as when using a mixture of particles from all three phages. The Ct value for the R. solanacearum standard curve ranged from 15.84 to 35.20 for 108 to 102 CFU, respectively. The mathematical equation that represents the curve is: y = 3.291x + 41.529, with a correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.9973. The Ct value for each dilution was the mean of three repetitions.

3.3. Sensitivity of Multiplex qPCR in the Detection of R. solanacearum Phages and the Bacterium in Different Types of Samples

A comparison of the sensitivities achieved by multiplex real-time PCR in the detection of the three phages and the bacterium using different types of samples with DNA purification or without it (direct samples) is shown in Table 2.
For the phage quantification, the detection limit was 10 PFU/mL in PBS buffer, 102 in river water and tomato plant extracts, and 103 PFU/g in soil. For the R. solanacearum quantification, the detection limit was 102 CFU/mL in PBS, 103 in river water and in tomato plant extracts, and 104 PFU/g in soil. When different methods of sample preparation were compared, direct methods yielded similar or identical results as when a laborious DNA purification protocol was used. The phage- and/or bacterium-free samples and PCR cocktail controls were negative by all tested protocols.
The sensitivity of the multiplex qPCR was the same as each individual amplification for vRsoP-WR2 phage, the three R. solanacearum phages, and the bacterium (Table 2). No differences on curve behavior were observed when vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 phages (Figure 4A), R. solanacearum (Figure 4B), or vRsoP-WR2 phage (Figure 4C) were amplified individually or all together (Figure 4D), showing no interference between the different primes and TaqMan probes used. Similarly, no differences in the efficiency and curve behavior were observed when different types of samples (river water, tomato plant extracts, or soil) were used.

4. Discussion

Bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum is one of the most important bacterial diseases concerning solanaceous plants and ornamentals of economic importance worldwide. Outbreaks in the field have frequently been associated with detection of the bacterium in watercourses, where it can survive for long periods as a free-living form and/or in roots of semi-aquatic weeds or other reservoir plants, or in the soil. In the host, detection of the pathogen can be hindered by the occurrence of latent or symptomless infections. Bacterial wilt management often fails due to the limited efficacy and environmental impact of agrochemical methods, and the lack of resistant cultivars. R. solanacearum is therefore subjected to strict regulation and included in international quarantine procedures [12,47]. Biological control methods are being explored. Among them, three lytic phages, vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, were isolated and further characterized because of their successful biocontrol of the pathogen [23,24,25,26,27]. As they proved to be specific for R. solanacearum, detection of at least one of them in environmental samples could be useful for the development of a sensitive, indirect, phage-based detection of the pathogen, since phage concentrations are usually ten times higher than those of their bacterial target [48]. Further, simultaneous sensitive detection and accurate identification of bacterium and phages are important to deepen knowledge on their interaction in the environment for improvement of the prevention and management of the disease.
There is a number of molecular tests that have been validated and can be routinely used for detection and identification of R. solanacearum (former phylotype II of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex) and the phylogenetically related species R. pseudosolanacearum (former phylotypes I and III) and Ralstonia syzygii subsp. indonesiensis (former phylotype IV of the complex) for screening of plant material and other environmental samples, and some of them are also quantitative [47]. Concerning R. solanacearum, real-time qPCR protocols have been reported either based on SYBR green detection or TaqMan probes [35,36,37,38,39,40,41], and the design of specific primers and DNA probes from the 16S rDNA region [35,40] or the 16–23S rRNA spacer sequence [39]. R. solanacearum has also been detected from soil and plant tissues by qPCR based on the integration of the rapid self-replicating ability of phages [49]. However, all these methods have been developed to target the pathogenic bacterium, even when phages have been used in the protocol. There is no previous report on the combined or simultaneous detection of R. solanacearum and several specific phages able to lyse it.
In this work, specific primers and TaqMan probes were designed and evaluated for simultaneous detection and quantification of R. solanacearum and the phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, by duplex and multiplex qPCR in water, soil, and plant material. The genomic sequences of the three phages were compared with sequences obtained from public databases to identify regions with differences. As the sequences of vRsoP-WF2 and vRsoP-WM2 are nearly identical [28], it was not possible to design a TaqMan probe to differentiate between them. In contrast, vRsoP-WR2 has an insert of 480 bp between positions 8619 and 9095 compared to the other two phages [28]. Therefore, primers and a specific TaqMan probe could be designed only for vRsoP-WR2 in ORF 17 (putative endonuclease). In silico and in vitro analyses showed that the sequence of the designed primers and the TaqMan probe were specific for vRsoP-WR2. Additionally, primers and a TaqMan probe for the universal detection of the three phages were designed in the ORFs 52–53 (phage terminase small subunit) and validated. In silico analysis showed that the designed universal phage primers and probe also amplified the related Ralstonia sp. phages RsoP1EGY and DU_RP_I. However, amplification with other Ralstonia-related phages, such as PSG 11 and PSG11.1 [28], is not expected due to sequence homology.
The amplification protocols for vRsoP-WR2 individual qPCR and the qPCR for the three R. solanacearum phages were optimized, as well as the multiplex qPCR for vRsoP-WR2, the three phages, and the bacterium. Amplification curves were obtained from all the positive samples, without amplification of the negative controls or DNA from other phages and/or other bacterial species present in plant extracts, soil, and irrigation water samples. No interference was observed between probes and fluorophores.
The sensitivity of real-time qPCR for the detection of the three R. solanacearum phages together (universal), the vRsoP-WR2 phage, R. solanacearum, and the multiplex (phages and bacterium) protocol, was determined in environmental water, plant material, and soil. With respect to the phages, sensitivities of detection in river water were appropriate to the concentrations reported for R. solanacearum phages, which were estimated between 102 and >103 lytic viral particles/mL in natural river water samples [30]. Similar sensitivities were obtained in samples of more complex composition, such as tomato plant extracts and soil, where the presence of PCR inhibitors has been commonly described [35,37,50]. This is particularly significant in soil samples, where inhibitors such as humic acids and the microbial diversity in their culturable and unculturable states cause the difficulty of detection of a specific microorganism [37]. With respect to R. solanacearum, sensitivity of detection in PBS without previous DNA purification was in agreement with 102 cells/mL obtained using the same primers and TaqMan probe by Weller et al. from cells suspended in water [35]. This sensitivity in water would not allow for a successful detection of R. solanacearum in river water in cases where natural population numbers of the bacterium have been reported to range from 10 to 80 CFU/mL [16]. The same authors obtained less sensitivity of R. solanacearum detection from potato extracts, pointing out the presence of qPCR inhibitors, and suggesting the need for the use of pathogen enrichment procedures [35]. Thus, the analytical sensitivity established in international procedures for extracts of potato heel-end cores spiked with R. solanacearum is 105 CFU/mL using the B2-I-F/B2-II-R/B2-P assay [35,47]. Since the protocols developed in this work for the simultaneous detection of the phages and bacterium were about one order of magnitude more sensitive in detecting the phages than the target bacterium, they could be successfully applied for a highly sensitive detection of R. solanacearum as indicators of the pathogen contamination in different types of plant and environmental samples.
A direct method of sample preparation was compared and validated for use in real-time qPCR. Conventional PCR-based techniques require purified total DNA or RNA as templates in amplification reactions. However, nucleic acid purification steps are laborious and expensive, limiting the number of samples that can be processed. In real-time PCR protocols, especially when a TaqMan probe is used, nucleic acid purifications can be partially or totally circumvented using direct sample preparation methods such as dilution or spot immobilization on membranes [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. Data obtained in this work showed that the dilution method of sample preparation allowed for the same sensitivity as conventional DNA extraction protocols. The dilution method requires fewer steps, is less labor-intensive and faster, and is more cost-effective than traditional purification DNA methods, favoring high-throughput results.
The qPCR protocols developed in this work are appropriate for analytical purposes, with excellent limits of detection and quantification. Phage isolation is generally carried out by plaque assays, with the limitations of their identification based on their lytic activity on indicator bacterial hosts and the need for relatively high numbers of phage particles in the sample [32]. Therefore, these molecular protocols for combined detection of R. solanacearum and the phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 substantially improved traditional methods, allowing for the sensitive, precise, reliable, and quick detection and quantification of phages and bacteria in tomato plant material, soil, and irrigation water, even without previous DNA purification, saving time and reagents by reducing the cost of the screening tests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.B. and E.G.B.; methodology, E.B. and À.F.-S.; investigation, E.B., À.F.-S., B.Á. and E.G.B.; resources, E.G.B.; data curation, E.B.; writing—original draft preparation, E.B., B.Á. and E.G.B.; writing—review and editing, E.B., À.F.-S., B.Á. and E.G.B.; visualization, E.B.; project administration, E.G.B.; funding acquisition, E.G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, the Spanish Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), and “ERDF: A way of making Europe”, grant number RTA2015-00087-C02, as well as by the Program for Research Support, “Atracció de Talent” sub-program from the Universitat de València.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Genomics and the Vegetal Production Units of Central Service for Experimental Research (SCSIE) from the Universitat de València (UV) (Valencia, Spain), as well as the Central Unit for Research in Medicine (UCIM) from the UV. E. Bertolini was the recipient of a Grant for temporary stays of Visiting Researchers, within the framework of the Program for Research Support, “Atracció de Talent” sub-program from the Universitat de València. E. Bertolini was the recipient of a Grant from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES–PrInt) from Brazil, and of a Research Productivity Grant from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) from Brazil.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Safni, I.; Cleenwerck, I.; De Vos, P.; Fegan, M.; Sly, L.; Kappler, U. Polyphasic taxonomic revision of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex: Proposal to emend the descriptions of Ralstonia solanacearum and Ralstonia syzygii and reclassify current R. syzygii strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. syzygii subsp. nov., R. solanacearum phylotype IV strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. indonesiensis subsp. nov., banana blood disease bacterium strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. celebesensis subsp. nov. and R. solanacearum phylotype I and III strains as Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 3087–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Prior, P.; Ailloud, F.; Dalsing, B.L.; Remenant, B.; Sanchez, B.; Allen, C. Genomic and proteomic evidence supporting the division of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum into three species. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hayward, A.C. Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1991, 29, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Elphinstone, J.G. The current bacterial wilt situation: A global overview. In Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex; Allen, C., Prior, P., Hayward, A.C., Eds.; APS Press: St. Paul, MI, USA, 2005; pp. 9–28. [Google Scholar]
  5. Álvarez, B.; Biosca, E.G.; López, M.M. On the life of Ralstonia solanacearum, a destructive bacterial plant pathogen. In Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology; Méndez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex: Badajoz, Spain, 2010; pp. 267–279. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vasse, J.; Frey, P.; Trigalet, A. Microscopic studies of intercellular infection and protoxylem invasion of tomato roots by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1995, 8, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Álvarez, B.; Vasse, J.; Le-Courtois, V.; Trigalet-Démery, D.; López, M.M.; Trigalet, A. Comparative behavior of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2 in diverse plant species. Phytopathology 2008, 98, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Schell, M.A. Control of virulence and pathogenicity genes of Ralstonia solanacearum by an elaborate sensory network. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2000, 38, 263–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Poueymiro, M.; Genin, S. Secreted proteins from Ralstonia solanacearum: A hundred tricks to kill a plant. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009, 12, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Genin, S.; Denny, T.P. Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2012, 50, 67–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deslandes, L.; Genin, S. Opening the Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector tool box: Insights into host cell subversion mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 20, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. European Union. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 of 28 November 2019 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards protective measures against pests of plants, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) N° 690/2008 and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019. OJEU 2019, L319, 1–279. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, Z.; Luo, W.; Cheng, S.; Zhang, H.; Zong, J.; Zhang, Z. Ralstonia solanacearum—A soil borne hidden enemy of plants: Research development in management strategies, their action mechanism and challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1141902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. United States Department of Agriculture. Plant Pests and Diseases Programs. Available online: http://www.aphis.usda.gov (accessed on 27 February 2023).
  15. Wenneker, M.; Verdel, M.S.W.; Groeneveld, R.M.W.; Kempenaar, C.; van Beuningen, A.R.; Janse, J.D. Ralstonia (Pseudomonas) solanacearum race 3 (biovar 2) in surface water and natural weed hosts: First report on stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1999, 105, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Caruso, P.; Palomo, J.L.; Bertolini, E.; Alvarez, B.; López, M.M.; Biosca, E.G. Seasonal variation of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2 populations in a Spanish river: Recovery of stressed cells at low temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Álvarez, B.; López, M.M.; Biosca, E.G. Survival strategies and pathogenicity of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II subjected to prolonged starvation in environmental water microcosms. Microbiology 2008, 154, 3590–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Álvarez, B.; López, M.M.; Biosca, E.G. Ralstonia solanacearum facing spread-determining climatic temperatures, sustained starvation, and naturally induced resuscitation of viable but non-culturable cells in environmental water. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Caruso, P.; Biosca, E.G.; Bertolini, E.; Marco-Noales, E.; Gorris, M.T.; Licciardello, C.; López, M.M. Genetic diversity reflects geographical origin of Ralstonia solanacearum strains isolated from plant and water sources in Spain. Int. Microbiol. Off. J. Span. Soc. Microbiol. 2017, 20, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture—Systems at breaking point. In Synthesis Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nion, Y.A.; Nion, Y.A.; Toyota, K. Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt diseases caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbes Environ. 2015, 30, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Álvarez, B.; Biosca, E.G. Bacteriophage-based bacterial wilt biocontrol for an environmentally sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. González Biosca, E.; López González, M.M.; Álvarez Ortega, B. Procedimiento para la Prevención y/o el Control Biológico de la Marchitez Causada por Ralstonia solanacearum, a Través del Uso de Bacteriófagos Útiles para Ello y Composiciones de los Mismos. Spain Patent ES2592352B2, 10 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. González Biosca, E.; López González, M.M.; Álvarez Ortega, B. Method for the Prevention and/or the Biological Control of Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, via the Use of Bacteriophages Suitable for This Purpose and Compositions Thereof. U.S. Patent US10508266B2, 17 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
  25. González Biosca, E.; López González, M.M.; Álvarez Ortega, B. Method for the Prevention and/or the Biological Control of Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, via the Use of Bacteriophages Suitable for this Purpose and compositions Thereof. European Patent EP3305892B1, 9 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. Álvarez, B.; López, M.M.; Biosca, E.G. Biocontrol of the major plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum in irrigation water and host plants by novel waterborne lytic bacteriophages. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Álvarez, B.; Gadea-Pallás, L.; Rodríguez, A.; Vicedo, B.; Figàs-Segura, À.; Biosca, E.G. Viability, stability and biocontrol activity in planta of specific Ralstonia solanacearum bacteriophages after their conservation prior to commercialization and use. Viruses 2022, 14, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biosca, E.G.; Català-Senent, J.F.; Figàs-Segura, À.; Bertolini, E.; López, M.M.; Álvarez, B. Genomic analysis of the first European bacteriophages with depolymerase activity and biocontrol efficacy against the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Viruses 2021, 13, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Civerolo, E.L. Bacteriophages. In Methods in Phytobacteriology; Klement, Z., Rudolph, K., Sands, D.C., Eds.; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1990; pp. 205–213. [Google Scholar]
  30. Álvarez, B.; López, M.M.; Biosca, E.G. Influence of native microbiota on survival of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II in river water microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7210–7217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Duyvejonck, H.; Merabishvili, M.; Pirnay, J.P.; De Vos, D.; Verbeken, G.; Van Belleghem, J.; Vaneechoutte, M. Development of a qPCR platform for quantification of the five bacteriophages within bacteriophage cocktail 2 (BFC2). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ács, N.; Gambino, M.; Brøndsted, L. Bacteriophage enumeration and detection methods. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 594868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Refardt, D. Real-time quantitative PCR to discriminate and quantify lambdoid bacteriophages of Escherichia coli K-12. Bacteriophage 2012, 2, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gayder, S.; Parcey, M.; Nesbitt, D.; Castle, A.J.; Svircev, A.M. Population dynamics between Erwinia amylovora, Pantoea agglomerans and bacteriophages: Exploiting synergy and competition to improve phage cocktail efficacy. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Weller, S.A.; Elphinstone, J.G.; Smith, N.C.; Boonham, N.; Stead, D.E. Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum strains with a quantitative, multiplex, real-time, fluorogenic PCR (TaqMan) assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2853–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ozakman, M.; Schaad, N.W. A real-time BIO-PCR assay for detection of Ralstonia solanacearum race 3, biovar 2, in asymptomatic potato tubers. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 25, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.Z.; Liu, X.; Ma, Z.H.; Li, B.; Allen, C.; Guo, J.H. A real-time PCR assay for the quantitative detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in the horticultural soil and plant tissues. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ha, Y.; Kim, J.-S.; Denny, T.P.; Schell, M.A. A rapid, sensitive assay for Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2 in plant and soil samples using magnetic beads and real-time PCR. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Massart, S.; Nagy, C.; Jijakli, M.H. Development of the simultaneous detection of Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus in potato tubers by a multiplex real-time PCR assay. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2014, 138, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vreeburg, R.A.M.; Bergsma-Vlami, M.; Bollema, R.M.; de Haan, E.G.; Kooman-Gersmann, M.; Smits-Mastebroek, L. Performance of real-time PCR and immunofluorescence for the detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus and Ralstonia solanacearum in potato tubers in routine testing. EPPO Bull. 2016, 46, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vreeburg, R.A.M.; Zendman, A.J.W.; Pol, A.; Verheij, E.; Nas, M.; Kooman-Gersmann, M. Validation of four real-time TaqMan PCRs for the detection of Ralstonia solanacearum and/or Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum and/or Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus in potato tubers using a statistical regression approach. EPPO Bull. 2018, 48, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Horita, M.; Tsuchiya, K. Causal agent of bacterial wilt disease Ralstonia solanacearum. In MAFF Microorganism Genetic Resources Manual N° 12; National Institute of Agricultural Sciences: Tsukuba, Japan, 2002; pp. 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  43. Miller, H. Practical aspects of preparing phage and plasmid DNA: Growth, maintenance, and storage of bacteria and bacteriophage. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987; Volume 152, pp. 145–170. ISBN 978-0-12-182053-4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sambrook, J.; Russel, D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  45. Murray, M.G.; Thompson, W.F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 239, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Fegan, M.; Holloway, G.; Hayward, A.C.; Timmis, J. Development of a diagnostic test based on the polymerase chain reaction to identify strains of Ralstonia solanacearum exhibiting the biovar 2 genotype. In Bacterial Wilt Disease: Molecular and Ecological Aspects; Prior, P., Allen, C., Elphinstone, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1998; pp. 34–43. [Google Scholar]
  47. Anonymous. PM 7/21 (3) Ralstonia solanacearum, R. pseudosolanacearum and R. syzygii (Ralstonia solanacearum species complex). EPPO Bull. 2022, 52, 225–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Suttle, C.A. Marine viruses-major players in the global ecosystem. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kutin, R.K.; Alvarez, A.; Jenkins, D.M. Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in natural substrates using phage amplification integrated with real-time PCR assay. J. Microbiol. Methods 2009, 76, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. López, M.M.; Llop, P.; Olmos, A.; Marco-Noales, E.; Cambra, M.; Bertolini, E. Are molecular tools solving the challenges posed by detection of plant pathogenic bacteria and viruses? Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2009, 11, 13–46. [Google Scholar]
  51. Olmos, A.; Dasi, M.A.; Candresse, T.; Cambra, M. Print-capture PCR: A simple and highly sensitive method for the detection of Plum pox virus (PPV) in plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24, 2192–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Osman, F.; Rowhani, A. Application of a spotting sample preparation technique for the detection of pathogens in woody plants by RT-PCR and real-time PCR (TaqMan). J. Virol. Meth. 2006, 133, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schaad, N.W.; Berthier-Schaad, Y.; Knorr, D. A high throughput membrane BIO-PCR technique for ultra-sensitive detection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. Plant Pathol. 2007, 56, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bertolini, E.; Moreno, A.; Capote, N.; Olmos, A.; De Luis, A.; Vidal, E.; Pérez-Panadés, J.; Cambra, M. Quantitative detection of Citrus tristeza virus in plant tissues and single aphids by real-time RT-PCR. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 120, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Capote, N.; Bertolini, E.; Olmos, A.; Vidal, E.; Martinez, M.C.; Cambra, M. Direct sample preparation methods for the detection of Plum pox virus by real-time RT-PCR. Int. Microbiol. 2009, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. De Boer, S.H.; López, M.M. New grower-friendly methods for plant pathogen monitoring. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2012, 50, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Fujikawa, T.; Miyata, S.I.; Iwanami, T. Convenient detection of the citrus greening (huanglongbing) bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ by direct PCR from the midrib extract. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Bertolini, E.; Felipe, R.T.A.; Sauer, A.V.; Lopes, S.; Arilla, A.; Vidal, E.; Mourão Filho, F.A.A.; Nunes, W.M.C.; Bové, J.M.; Cambra, M. Tissue-print and squash real-time PCR for direct detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ species in citrus plants and psyllid vectors. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 1149–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bertolini, E.; Teresani, G.; Loiseau, M.; Tanaka, F.A.O.; Barbé, S.; Martínez, C.; Gentit, P.; López, M.M.; Cambra, M. Transmission of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ in carrot seeds. Plant Pathol. 2015, 64, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 15 00841 g001 550
Figure 1. Graphical summary of the methodology developed for the detection and quantification of the Ralstonia solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and the target bacterium in environmental water, soil, and plant material using duplex and multiplex qPCR.
Figure 1. Graphical summary of the methodology developed for the detection and quantification of the Ralstonia solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and the target bacterium in environmental water, soil, and plant material using duplex and multiplex qPCR.
Viruses 15 00841 g001
Viruses 15 00841 g002 550
Figure 2. Nucleotide alignment of the sequences of Ralstonia solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 in Geneious Prime software. Primer and probe sequences of the three phages (A), and primer and probe sequences specific to phage vRsoP-WR2 (B).
Figure 2. Nucleotide alignment of the sequences of Ralstonia solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 in Geneious Prime software. Primer and probe sequences of the three phages (A), and primer and probe sequences specific to phage vRsoP-WR2 (B).
Viruses 15 00841 g002
Viruses 15 00841 g003 550
Figure 3. Quantification range of real-time duplex PCR. Amplification curves of 10-fold serial dilutions from 108 to 10 PFU/mL for vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 phages (A), and standard curve (B). Amplification curves of 10-fold serial dilutions from 108 to 102 CFU/mL for Ralstonia solanacearum (C), and standard curve (D). Standard curves were obtained with mean values of three replicates for each of the ten-fold serial dilutions.
Figure 3. Quantification range of real-time duplex PCR. Amplification curves of 10-fold serial dilutions from 108 to 10 PFU/mL for vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 phages (A), and standard curve (B). Amplification curves of 10-fold serial dilutions from 108 to 102 CFU/mL for Ralstonia solanacearum (C), and standard curve (D). Standard curves were obtained with mean values of three replicates for each of the ten-fold serial dilutions.
Viruses 15 00841 g003
Viruses 15 00841 g004 550
Figure 4. Real-time multiplex PCR. Amplification curves of serial dilutions from 106 to 102 PFU/mL of vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 phages ((A)—red), amplification curves of serial dilutions from 106 to 103 CFU/mL of Ralstonia solanacearum ((B)—blue), amplification curves of serial dilutions from 106 to 103 CFU/mL of vRsoP-WR2 phage ((C)—green), and amplification curves of serial dilutions from 106 to 102 CFU/mL of vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 phages, and from 106 to 103 CFU/mL of bacteria ((D)—red + green + blue). Dilutions of phages and the bacterium were performed in river water and direct sample preparation was used. Amplifications were performed in triplicate.
Figure 4. Real-time multiplex PCR. Amplification curves of serial dilutions from 106 to 102 PFU/mL of vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 phages ((A)—red), amplification curves of serial dilutions from 106 to 103 CFU/mL of Ralstonia solanacearum ((B)—blue), amplification curves of serial dilutions from 106 to 103 CFU/mL of vRsoP-WR2 phage ((C)—green), and amplification curves of serial dilutions from 106 to 102 CFU/mL of vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2 phages, and from 106 to 103 CFU/mL of bacteria ((D)—red + green + blue). Dilutions of phages and the bacterium were performed in river water and direct sample preparation was used. Amplifications were performed in triplicate.
Viruses 15 00841 g004
Table
Table 1. Sequences of primers and probes for Ralstonia solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and the bacterial species R. solanacearum.
Table 1. Sequences of primers and probes for Ralstonia solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and the bacterial species R. solanacearum.
NameSequence (5′–3′)Reference
WFMR2 FCGTGCCCTCGTAGCGAATThis work
WFMR2 RGTTGCAAGTAGTGGGCGATGTThis work
WFMR2 PFAM-AACTAAACAACACCCAGCACAGAAAGACTTTCG-TAMRAThis work
WR2 FAAGGCACAGGGACTCCCATTThis work
WR2 RAAGTGCCCGCGTGAGACTTThis work
WR2 PCy5-ACCTGGAGG/TAO/AGTCGGACATCCAAATTCC-RQThis work
B2-I-FTGGCGCACTGCACTCAAC[35,46]
B2-II-RAATCACATGCAATTCGCCTACG[35,46]
B2-PHEX–TTCAAGCCGAACACCTGCTGCAAG-IABkFQ[35]
Table
Table 2. Sensitivity of PCR protocols in the detection of Ralstonia solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and R. solanacearum in PBS, river water, tomato plant extracts, and soil from pathogen-free samples, with and without DNA purification.
Table 2. Sensitivity of PCR protocols in the detection of Ralstonia solanacearum phages vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, and vRsoP-WR2, and R. solanacearum in PBS, river water, tomato plant extracts, and soil from pathogen-free samples, with and without DNA purification.
Real-Time PCR ProtocolTypes of Samples
PBSRiver WaterTomato PlantSoil
Direct aDirectDNA bDirectDNADirectDNA
R. solanacearum phage cocktail (PFU/mL)
(vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, vRsoP-WR2)		10102102102102103103
vRsoP-WR2 phage (PFU/mL)10102102102102102102
R. solanacearum (CFU/mL)102103104103103104104
Multiplex:
R. solanacearum phage cocktail (PFU/mL)
(vRsoP-WF2, vRsoP-WM2, vRsoP-WR2)		10102102102102102102
vRsoP-WR2 phage (PFU/mL)10102102102102103103
R. solanacearum (CFU/mL)102103104103103104104
a Without DNA purification. b CTAB DNA purification.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bertolini, E.; Figàs-Segura, À.; Álvarez, B.; Biosca, E.G. Development of TaqMan Real-Time PCR Protocols for Simultaneous Detection and Quantification of the Bacterial Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and Their Specific Lytic Bacteriophages. Viruses 2023, 15, 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15040841

AMA Style

Bertolini E, Figàs-Segura À, Álvarez B, Biosca EG. Development of TaqMan Real-Time PCR Protocols for Simultaneous Detection and Quantification of the Bacterial Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and Their Specific Lytic Bacteriophages. Viruses. 2023; 15(4):841. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15040841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bertolini, Edson, Àngela Figàs-Segura, Belén Álvarez, and Elena G. Biosca. 2023. "Development of TaqMan Real-Time PCR Protocols for Simultaneous Detection and Quantification of the Bacterial Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and Their Specific Lytic Bacteriophages" Viruses 15, no. 4: 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15040841

APA Style

Bertolini, E., Figàs-Segura, À., Álvarez, B., & Biosca, E. G. (2023). Development of TaqMan Real-Time PCR Protocols for Simultaneous Detection and Quantification of the Bacterial Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and Their Specific Lytic Bacteriophages. Viruses, 15(4), 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15040841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop