Next Article in Journal
Use of a Cellulase from Trichoderma reesei as an Adjuvant for Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Disruption in Combination with Antibiotics as an Alternative Treatment in Secondary Endodontic Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Poly-ε-Caprolactone Implants for Benznidazole Prolonged Release: An Alternative to Chagas Disease Oral Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Drug Delivery Strategies for Avobenzone: A Case Study of Photostabilization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring Synthetic Dihydrobenzofuran and Benzofuran Neolignans as Antiprotozoal Agents against Trypanosoma cruzi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Derivatives of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloid Ambelline as Selective Inhibitors of Hepatic Stage of Plasmodium berghei Infection In Vitro

by
Kateřina Hradiská Breiterová
1,
Aneta Ritomská
1,
Diana Fontinha
2,
Jana Křoustková
1,
Daniela Suchánková
1,
Anna Hošťálková
1,
Marcela Šafratová
1,
Eliška Kohelová
1,
Rozálie Peřinová
1,
Rudolf Vrabec
1,
Denise Francisco
2,
Miguel Prudêncio
2 and
Lucie Cahlíková
1,*
1
Secondary Metabolites of Plants as Potential Drugs Research Group, Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
2
Prudêncio Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Edf. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(3), 1007; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031007
Submission received: 27 December 2022 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023

Abstract

:
The incidence rate of malaria and the ensuing mortality prompts the development of novel antimalarial drugs. In this work, the activity of twenty-eight Amaryllidaceae alkaloids (1–28) belonging to seven different structural types was assessed, as well as twenty semisynthetic derivatives of the β-crinane alkaloid ambelline (28a–28t) and eleven derivatives of the α-crinane alkaloid haemanthamine (29a–29k) against the hepatic stage of Plasmodium infection. Six of these derivatives (28h, 28m, 28n and 28r–28t) were newly synthesized and structurally identified. The most active compounds, 11-O-(3,5-dimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28m) and 11-O-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28n), displayed IC50 values in the nanomolar range of 48 and 47 nM, respectively. Strikingly, the derivatives of haemanthamine (29) with analogous substituents did not display any significant activity, even though their structures are quite similar. Interestingly, all active derivatives were strictly selective against the hepatic stage of infection, as they did not demonstrate any activity against the blood stage of Plasmodium infection. As the hepatic stage is a bottleneck of the plasmodial infection, liver-selective compounds can be considered crucial for further development of the malaria prophylactics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Malaria is a severe parasitic infection of global relevance caused by unicellular protozoa from the genus Plasmodium, transmitted to their mammalian hosts by female Anopheles mosquitoes. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 40% of the world’s population lives in areas at risk of malaria, and in 2020, 241 million cases of this disease were reported, resulting in 627 thousand deaths [1]. There is also a serious economic and social onus on malaria-endemic countries [2,3]. The most important factors related to malaria control are vector control measures, prevention, early diagnosis, and appropriate and effective medication. However, the development of drug resistance in Plasmodium spp. contributes a crucial impetus for new potential drug research [4].
There are fourteen subgenera and over two hundred species in the genus Plasmodium, but only five species cause malaria in humans—P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae and P. knowlesi [5,6]. From these, P. falciparum infection leads to the most severe cases [5]. The human transmissible Plasmodium parasites cycle between two hosts—Anopheles mosquitoes and humans. The human part of the lifecycle is divided into two phases—hepatic or liver and the erythrocytic or blood stages of the infection. After the mosquito blood meal, sporozoites, the liver-infective forms of the parasite, are inoculated into the skin of the human host, and they enter the vascular system, eventually reaching the liver. There, each sporozoite traverses a few hepatocytes before productively invading a final one, where it develops into tens of thousands of merozoites, the blood-infective forms of the parasite [7]. Parasites are then released into the bloodstream inside merosomes that burst to release erythrocyte-infective merozoites [8,9,10]. Most merozoites start a cycle of asexual schizogony, but a small part of them starts the sexual cycle—gametocytogenesis [6,11]. Gametocytes may be uptaken by the mosquito vector upon a bloodmeal, where they undergo a series of steps that give rise to new sporozoites, thus completing the parasite’s life cycle. In P. vivax and P. ovale infections, the liver may harbour hypnozoites, dormant parasites that can cause malaria relapses many weeks to years after the primary infection [6]. The liver stage of infection is clinically silent but is obligatory for all mammalian-infective Plasmodium species. Collectively, these traits make this bottleneck of infection the ideal pharmacological target for malaria prophylaxis [12,13]. Furthermore, targeting the liver is the only way to eliminate the dormant forms of P. vivax and P. ovale parasites and, thus, to achieve a radical cure in the case of these hypnozoite-forming parasite species. Although most of the drugs currently used against malaria are targeted to the erythrocytic stage of infection, primaquine and tafenoquine target liver parasite forms, including hypnozoites [14,15]. Regrettably, primaquine and tafenoquine cannot be used in the treatment of patients who are deficient in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme (G6PD), as they are at increased risk of developing hemolysis, potentially leading to hemolytic anemia [16,17]. The obligatory nature of the liver stage of Plasmodium infection makes it an attractive drug target for many researchers. Although these stages pose several experimental challenges [18], they are promising, as they correspond to a relatively low parasite load in the organism [10,12]. Moreover, new drugs with different mechanisms of action are necessary for the treatment of G6PD-deficient patients.
During the last half-century, P. falciparum has developed resistance against several available antimalarial drugs (chloroquine, mefloquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine combination, etc.). Many studies revealed that resistance is developed mainly due to the spontaneous genetic mutation or amplification in key enzymes or transporters [8,19]. Historically, P. falciparum resistance occurred in Cambodia, from where it expanded to the Greater Mekong Subregion and the rest of the malaria-affected area. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has been used as a first-line treatment for non-severe malaria [4,20,21]. Unfortunately, signs of P. falciparum resistance to artemisinin and ACT are beginning to emerge as a serious threat to the whole region and mainly to all WHO malaria control and elimination endeavors [22,23]. In recent years, research attention has shifted to different Plasmodium stages and various biochemical pathways of the parasite‘s metabolism, hoping for new potential therapeutics. Possible targets are liver parasites, asexual and sexual blood stages, and even dormant hypnozoites [8]. An alternative to de novo drug development is the repurposing of existing drugs against the new target. This option makes the process of drug discovery and licensing much faster and cheaper due to the previously performed pre-clinical and clinical safety studies [10,24,25].
Forty-nine percent of all drugs and 67% of small-molecule drugs approved between 1981–2019 are natural compounds, their derivatives, or compounds inspired by their structural moieties [26]. This proves that natural compounds and their derivatives are an important source for potential new drugs. This is true also for the treatment of malaria, which initially resorted to the alkaloid quinine (Cinchona spp., Rubiaceae), and more recently followed by the discovery of the sesquiterpene lactone artemisinin (Artemisia annua, Asteraceae) and its semisynthetic derivatives [8,27]. One of the most interesting groups of bioactive natural compounds are alkaloids, particularly Amaryllidaceae alkaloids (AmA). This group of alkaloids is specific to the Amaryllidaceae family, which consists of over 1600 species in 81 genera [28] and which is one of the most important alkaloidal families, with almost 600 alkaloids isolated and structurally described so far, providing us with a rich source of compounds of various structural types to study [29,30,31]. The biological properties described for these alkaloids include analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and cholinesterase-inhibitory activity, in addition to antimalarial activity [32]. Unfortunately, many of these alkaloids are present in low concentrations in plants. Conversely, some AmAs are present in abundant amounts in specific species or cultivars, so they can be used as structural scaffolds for the development of a diversified spectrum of potential drug candidates. Up to date, extracts prepared from 22 various Amaryllidaceae species have been screened for their antiplasmodial activity [30,33,34,35,36]. Except one, all those studies were conducted on avian P. galinaceum parasites, as well as on several chloroquine-sensitive (3D7, D-6, D-10, NF54, T9.96), chloroquine-resistant (FAC8, FCR-3, RKL-2, W-2), and multidrug-resistant (Dd2, K-1) strains of P. falciparum. Nevertheless, none of them has been tested yet against the liver stage of Plasmodium infection [30,33]. Only one study was conducted on P. berghei in mice with an interesting activity, which could be caused by a high content of lycorine in the studied fraction of Crinum jagus (Thomps) Dandy [35]. From the isolated alkaloids that have already been characterized, acetylcaranine and ambelline showed promising activity against the resistant Dd2 P. falciparum strain, with IC50 values of 3.5 ± 0.3 μM and 7.3 ± 0.3 μM, respectively [34]. In another study, lycorine displayed an interesting activity against the chloroquine-sensitive 3D7 strain (IC50 = 2.5 μM) and the multidrug-resistant K1 strain (IC50 = 3.1 μM) [33]. In the present study, the potential antiplasmodial activity was evaluated for twenty-eight structurally diverse AmAs (1–28) and thirty-one semisynthetic derivatives of ambelline (28a–28t) and haemanthamine (29a–29k) with diverse substitutions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Experimental Procedures

All solvents were handled according to standard procedures before use. All reagents and catalysts were purchased from a commercial source (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on a VNMR S500 (Varian) spectrometer operating at 500 MHz for 1H and 125.7 MHz for 13C at 25 °C. The coupling constant (J) is given in Hz, and the chemical shifts are reported in ppm. ESI-HRMS were obtained with a Waters Synapt G2-Si hybrid mass analyzer of a quadrupole-time-of-flight (Q-TOF) type, coupled to a Waters Acquity I-Class UHPLC system. The EI-MS were obtained on an Agilent 7890A GC 5975 inert MSD operating in EI mode at 70 eV (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A DB-5 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Agilent Technologies, USA) was used. The used temperature program was: 100–180 °C at 15 °C/min, 1 min hold at 180 °C, and 180–300 °C at 5 °C/min and 5 min hold at 300 °C with a detection range of m/z 40–600. The injector temperature was 280 °C. The flow-rate of the carrier gas (helium) was 0.8 mL/min, and a split ratio of 1:15 was used. The ESI-MS were obtained using a Waters Autopurification™ HPLC-MS system (Milford, CT, USA). The apparatus consisted of a Waters Sample Manager 2767, a System Fluidics organizer, two Waters 515 HPLC pumps, a Waters 2545 Binary Gradient module, a Waters 2998 Photodiode array detector, and a Waters Acquity qDa detector. The sample was analyzed at ambient temperature using a XSelect® CSH™ C18 OBD™ reverse phase column (100 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm) (Milford, USA). Water with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and methanol (MeOH) with 0.1% formic acid (solvent B) were used as mobile phases. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1 mL/min. The gradient elution program was programmed as follows (v/v): 0 min 5% B, 5 min 100% B, 8.5 min 5% B, followed by 1.5 min at initial conditions for re-equilibration. The optimum values of the ESI-MS parameters were: capillary voltage 0.8 kV; probe temperature 600 °C; and cone voltage 15V. LC/MS were recorded across the range of 200–800 m/z. For PDA detection, the detector range was set from 190 to 700 nm. LC ESI-MS analyses were carried out in the positive ion mode. All isolated and prepared compounds were either analyzed or purified by TLC on precoated silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Compounds on the plates were observed using UV light (λ = 254 and 366 nm) and visualized by spraying with Dragendorff’s reagent. Optical rotation was measured on a P3000 polarimeter in either CHCl3 or MeOH.

2.2. Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids

All tested AmAs (1–28), together with haemanthamine (29), were isolated and described in detail during our thorough phytochemical studies performed on Nerine bowdenii (W. Watson) [37], Narcissus poeticus cv. (Pink Parasol) [38], Narcissus pseudonarcissus cv. (Dutch Master) [39], and Narcissus cv. (Professor Einstein) [40]. The fresh bulbs of all plant species were obtained from the herbal dealer Lukon Glads (Sadská, Czech Republic). Botanical identification was performed by Prof. L. Opletal. A voucher specimen of each plant is deposited in the Herbarium of the Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové.

2.3. Preparation of Ambelline (28) and Haemanthamine (29) Derivatives

The elaborated description of the acylation of ambelline (28) was previously published by Maříková et al., together with NMR spectra of compounds 28b–28g, 28i–28l, and 28o–28q [41]. The NMR spectra of acetylambelline (28a) were previously reported by Viladomat et al. [42]. The description of the acylation of haemanthamine (29) was previously published by Kohelová et al. and Peřinová et al. [43,44].

2.4. NMR Spectra of Newly Synthesized Derivatives

NMR spectra and HRMS of newly developed semisynthetic derivatives of ambelline can be found in Supplementary Materials. NMR spectra and HRMS of all previously published semisynthetic derivatives can be found in the following references: 28b–28g, 28i–28l, and 28o–28q [41]; 29a–29b, 29f, and 29k [43]; and 29c–29e and 29g–29j [44].

2.4.1. 11-O-(3,5-Dimethylbenzoyl)ambelline (28h)

Yield 67 mg (94%); white powder; [α]24D = +20.2 (c = 0.139; CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.22 (2H, s), 7.12 (1H, s), 6.59 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 6.57 (1H, s), 6.08 (1H, dd, J = 10.0 Hz, J = 5.2 Hz), 5.86 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz), 5.80 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz), 5.33 (1H, dd, J = 8.0 Hz, J = 3.8 Hz), 4.37 (1H, d, J = 17.5 Hz), 4.00 (3H, s), 3.93 (1H, overlap, d, J = 17.5 Hz), 3.93–3.87 (2H, overlap, m), 3.53 (1H, ddd, J = 13.7 Hz, J = 4.0 Hz, J = 1.7 Hz), 3.37 (3H, s), 2.80 (1H, ddd, J = 14.2 Hz, J = 4.0 Hz, J = 1.7 Hz), 2.28 (6H, s), 2.21–2.16 (1H, m), 1.79 (1H, td, J = 13.7 Hz, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 166.4, 147.8, 140.6, 137.7, 134.5, 133.9, 133.8, 131.2, 129.7, 127.2, 126.6, 117.3, 100.5, 99.6, 87.3, 72.2, 63.0, 59.8, 59.1, 58.6, 56.5, 47.5, 28.7, 21.0; ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C27H30NO6+ [M+H]+ 464.2068, found 464.2067.

2.4.2. 11-O-(3,5-Dimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28m)

Yield 58 mg (75%); yellow powder; [α]24D= +32.4 (c = 0.15; CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 6.80 (2H, d, J = 2.5 Hz), 6.60–6.55 (3H, m), 6.07 (1H, dd, J = 10.3 Hz, J = 4.9 Hz), 5.81 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 5.77 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 5.31 (1H, dd, J = 7.8 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz), 4.35 (1H, d, J = 17.1 Hz), 3.99 (3H, s), 3.94–3.85 (3H, m), 3.73 (6H, s), 3.50 (1H, dd, J = 13.6 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz), 3.35 (3H, s), 2.82–2.75 (1H, m), 2.17 (1H, dd, J = 14.2 Hz, J = 4.4 Hz), 1.78 (1H, td, J = 13.6 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 165.9, 160.4, 147.7, 140.6, 133.9, 133.7, 131.6, 131.1, 126.7, 117.3, 106.6, 106.3, 100.4, 99.4, 87.8, 72.1, 63.0, 59.9, 59.1, 58.7, 56.5, 55.3, 47.2, 28.6; ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C27H30NO8+ [M+H]+ 496.1966, found 496.1977.

2.4.3. 11-O-(3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28n)

Yield 17 mg (36%); white powder; [α]24D= +83.3 (c = 0.12; CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 6.94 (2H, s), 6.62 (1H, s), 6.58 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 6.08 (1H, dd, J = 10.0 Hz, J = 5.1 Hz), 5.80 (2H, s), 5.31 (1H, dd, J = 7.9 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz), 4.36 (1H, d, J = 17.6 Hz), 3.98 (3H, s), 3.97–3.87 (3H, m), 3.86 (3H, s), 3.81 (6H, s), 3.49 (1H, dd, J = 13.8 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz), 3.37 (3H, s), 2.77 (1H, ddd, J = 14.2 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz, J = 1.4 Hz), 2.22–2.16 (1H, m), 1.80 (1H, td, J = 13.8 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 165.8, 152.7, 147.6, 142.1, 140.7, 134.1, 133.7, 131.0, 126.9, 124.7, 117.4, 106.5, 100.5, 99.4, 87.9, 72.2, 63.0, 60.8, 60.1, 59.1, 58.8, 56.6, 55.9, 47.0, 28.7; ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C28H32NO9+ [M+H]+ 526.2072, found 526.2077.

2.4.4. 11-O-(4-Methyl-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28r)

Yield 76 mg (100%); pale yellow oil; [α]24D= +78.7 (c = 0.12; CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.97–7.95 (1H, m), 7.88 (1H, dd, J = 7.8 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 6.56 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 6.50 (1H, s), 6.09 (1H, dd, J = 10.0 Hz, J = 5.2 Hz), 5.91–5.89 (1H, m), 5.87–5.86 (1H, m), 5.40 (1H, dd, J = 8.0 Hz, J = 3.7 Hz), 4.38 (1H, d, J = 17.5 Hz), 4.02 (3H, s), 3.94 (1H, overlap, d, J = 17.5 Hz), 3.94–3.88 (2H, overlap, m), 3.55 (1H, dd, J = 13.8 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz), 3.37 (3H, s), 2.87–2.81 (1H, m), 2.62 (3H, s), 2.23–2.16 (1H, m), 1.78 (1H, td, J = 13.8 Hz, J = 3.9 Hz); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 164.2, 149.0, 148.1, 140.7, 138.5, 134.1, 133.29, 133.25, 132.9, 130.9, 129.2, 126.9, 125.7, 117.0, 100.8, 99.0, 88.1, 72.1, 63.2, 59.8, 59.2, 58.6, 56.6, 47.6, 28.8, 20.6; ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C26H27N2O8+ [M+H]+ 495.1762, found 495.1771.

2.4.5. 11-O-(2-Chloro-4-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28s)

Yield 91 mg (100%); pale yellow oil; [α]24D= −8.3 (c = 0.10; CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.21 (1H, d, J = 2.1 Hz), 7.99 (1H, dd, J = 8.3 Hz, J = 2.1 Hz), 7.29 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 6.65 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 6.47 (1H, s), 6.10 (1H, dd, J = 9.8 Hz, J = 5.4 Hz), 5.82–5.79 (2H, m), 5.34 (1H, dd, J = 7.8 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 4.36 (1H, d, J = 17.6 Hz), 3.98 (3H, s), 3.94–3.85 (3H, m), 3.51 (1H, dd, J = 13.6 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 3.36 (3H, s), 2.94–2.87 (1H, m), 2.20–2.12 (1H, m), 1.75 (1H, td, J = 13.6 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 163.6, 149.3, 147.9, 140.7, 135.0, 134.9, 134.0, 133.3, 132.1, 131.3, 126.8, 125.9, 121.0, 117.6, 100.6, 99.2, 89.5, 72.1, 63.6, 59.6, 59.1, 58.5, 56.5, 47.9, 28.8; ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C25H24ClN2O8+ [M+H]+ 515.1216, found 515.1227.

2.4.6. 11-O-(4-Chloro-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28t)

Yield 52 mg (59%); yellow powder; [α]24D= +27.2 (c = 0.24; CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.88 (1H, dd, J = 8.3 Hz, J = 2.0 Hz), 7.84 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 7.57 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 6.54 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz), 6.47 (1H, s), 6.14–6.06 (1H, m), 5.90–5.86 (2H, m), 5.32 (1H, dd, J = 8.1 Hz, J = 3.6 Hz), 4.37 (1H, d, J = 17.6 Hz), 4.02 (3H, s), 3.97–3.85 (3H, m), 3.56 (1H, dd, J = 13.7 Hz, J = 4.2 Hz), 3.37 (3H, s), 2.87–2.81 (1H, m), 2.23–2.16 (1H, m), 1.76 (1H, td, J = 13.7 Hz, J = 4.2 Hz); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 163.3, 148.1, 147.6, 140.8, 134.1, 133.4, 133.2, 132.0, 131.7, 130.7, 129.8, 127.1, 126.5, 116.9, 100.9, 98.8, 88.4, 72.1, 63.2, 59.7, 59.2, 58.6, 56.6, 47.6, 28.7; ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C25H24ClN2O8+ [M+H]+ 515.1216, found 515.1224.

2.5. In Vitro Activity against P. berghei—Hepatic Stages

Activity against the hepatic stage of P. berghei infection was assessed using the human hepatoma cell line Huh-7 (deposited at the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources under JCRB0403). The protocol was previously comprehensively described by Prudêncio et al. [45] and by Ploemen et al. [46]. Briefly, cell culture medium consisted of 1640 RPMI medium supplemented with 10% v/v fetal calf serum, 1% v/v L-glutamine, 1% v/v nonessential amino acids, 1% v/v penicillin/streptomycin, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well in 100 µL of culture medium and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for approximately 18 h. Tested compounds were dissolved in DMSO to 10 mM stock solutions and then diluted with infection medium (culture medium enriched with 50 µg/mL of gentamicin and 0.8 µg/mL of amphotericin B) to concentrations of 10 and 1 µM for screening and various concentrations ranging from 30 to 0.0001 µM for IC50 determination, respectively. The culture medium was substituted by infection medium with diluted compounds 1 hour in advance of infection. Luciferase-expressing P. berghei sporozoites (PbA-LuciGFPcon spz) were freshly obtained through the dissection of salivary glands from infected female Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. Sporozoites were added to the cells at 1:1 ratio, i.e., 1 × 104 sporozoites were added per well, and then subjected to centrifugation at 1800× g for 5 min. The plate was then incubated for 46 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2, at which time Huh-7 cell confluency was indirectly assessed by the alamarBlue assay (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), as reported in the manufacturer’s protocol. Parasite load was assessed 48 h post-infection by a bioluminescence assay, as reported by the manufacturer (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA). GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to obtain IC50 values using nonlinear regression analysis to fit the dose-response curves normalized results.

2.6. In Vitro Activity against P. falciparum Blood Stages

Activity against the blood stage of P. falciparum infection was assessed by flow cytometry analysis following the incubation of either test compounds or the drug vehicle (DMSO) with ring-stage synchronized parasite cultures, as previously described [47]. Stock solutions of the test compounds, as well as of the positive control compound chloroquine, were prepared in DMSO and diluted to test concentrations in complete malaria culture medium (CMCM), i.e., 1640 RPMI medium supplemented with 25 mM HEPES, 2.4 mM L-glutamine, 50 µg/mL gentamicin, 0.5% w/v Albumax, 11 mM glucose, 1.47 mM hypoxanthine, and 37.3 mM NaHCO3. Samples at tested concentration were then incubated with ring-stage synchronized cultures of P. falciparum NF54 at 2.5% hematocrit and at approximately 1% parasitemia in 96-well plates at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 and 5% O2 atmosphere. Forty-eight hours post incubation, parasite load was assessed by flow cytometry, upon staining with the DNA-specific dye SYBR green I. Approximately 100,000 events were analyzed in each flow cytometry measurement.

2.7. Cytotoxicity Assessment In Vitro (MTT Assay)

HepG2 cells of human hepatocellular carcinoma (ATCC HB-8065; passage 20–25), purchased from Health Protection Agency Culture Collections (ECACC, Salisbury, UK), were cultured in Minimum Essential Medium Eagle supplemented with 10% v/v fetal bovine serum and 1% v/v L-glutamine solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. For passaging, the cells were treated with trypsin/EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C and then harvested. For the cytotoxicity evaluation, the cells treated with the test substances were used, while untreated HepG2 cells served as a control group. The cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well and incubated for 24 h. All tested compounds were dissolved in DMSO to prepare 10 mM stock solutions and diluted to the desired concentration just before the cell treatment. Cytotoxicity of all studied derivatives was screened at 10 μM concentration, and all samples were measured in triplicates. Positive and negative controls were also included. Plates were incubated for 24 h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After the incubation, a solution of thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in RPMI 1640 medium without phenol red (BioTech, Prague, Czech Republic) was added and incubated for 3 h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Afterwards, formazan crystals were dissolved in DMSO, and the absorbance of samples was recorded at 570 nm (Synergy Neo2 Multi-Mode Reader NEO2SMALPHAB; BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Studied Alkaloids and Their Semisynthetic Derivatives

The main aim of this study was to assess the antiplasmodial activity of AmA and their semisynthetic derivatives. Eight AmAs (specifically narwedine, homolycorine, masonine, lycoramine, galanthamine, oduline, haemanthamine, and hippeastrine) were tested in the initial experiment, and the results were published by Šafratová et al. [38]. Herein, twenty-eight other AmA (Figure 1) and thirty-one semisynthetic derivatives of ambelline (28, Figure 2) and haemanthamine (29, Figure 3) were tested. The selected AmAs can be divided into seven groups regarding the structural types that they belong to. Galanthamine-type alkaloids are represented by chlidanthine (1), lycoraminone (2), and norlycoramine (3); lycorine-type by caranine (4), acetylcaranine (5), lycorine (6), 1-O-acetyllycorine (7), galanthine (8), 9-O-demethylgalanthine (9), and norpluviine (10); lycorenine (11), O-ethyllycorenine (12), eugenine (13), 9-O-demethylhomolycorine (14), and tetrahydromasonine (15) belong to the homolycorine-type alkaloids; the tazettine type is represented by a single alkaloid tazettine (16), as well as the montanine type by pancracine (17); haemanthidine (18), hamayne (19), epimaritidine (20), 9-O-demethylmaritidine (21), and seco-isopowellaminone (22) are haemanthamine (α-crinane) structural type alkaloids, and buphanamine (23), 1-O-acetylbulbisine (24), undulatine (25), crinine (26), buphanisine (27), and ambelline (28) are representatives of the crinine (β-crinane) structural type of AmA. The last mentioned alkaloid—ambelline—served as a template structure for the preparation of semisynthetic derivatives (28a–28t). Moreover, eleven previously published esters of haemanthamine (29a–29k) [43,44] with substituents analogous to the selected esters of ambelline were also studied. The antiplasmodial effect of haemanthamine (29) itself was tested previously, but without notable activity [38]. This paper discusses the relationship between structure and activity (SAR) against the hepatic stage of Plasmodium infection for the crinine (β-crinane) and haemanthamine (α-crinane) structure type of AmA, together with a discussion of the importance of benzoyl moiety substitution.

3.2. Synthesis of Ambelline (28) and Haemanthamine (29) Derivatives

A sufficient amount of the alkaloid ambelline (28) was isolated from the fresh bulbs of Nerine bowdenii (W. Watson), while haemanthamine (29) was obtained from the fresh bulbs of Narcissus pseudonarcissus cv. (Dutch Master), as stated in our preceding studies [37,39]. The purity of both template alkaloids (≥95%) was determined by HRMS and NMR analyses. For the preparation of ambelline esters (28a–28t), we proceeded according to the schemes in Figure 2 and as previously described [41]. The synthesis of haemanthamine esters (29a–29k) was thoroughly described by Kohelová et al. [43] and Peřinová et al. [44] in our preceding studies. Structures of the tested derivatives can be found in Figure 3. Haemanthamine derivatives chosen for this study were 11-O-propionylhaemanthamine (29a, substituents are analogous to those of compound 28b); 11-O-isobutanoylhaemanthamine (29b, analogous to 28c); 11-O-(3-methylbenzoyl)haemanthamine (29c, corresponding to 28f); 11-O-(4-methylbenzoyl)haemanthamine (29d, analogous to 28g); 11-O-(2-methoxybenzoyl)haemanthamine (29e, analogous to 28i); 11-O-(3-methoxybenzoyl)haemanthamine (29f, substitution corresponds to 28j); 11-O-(4-methoxybenzoyl)haemanthamine (29g, substituents same as in 28k); 11-O-(3,4-dimethoxybenzoyl)haemanthamine (29h, refers to 28l); 11-O-(3,5-dimethoxybenzoyl)haemanthamine (29i, analogous to 28m); 11-O-(3-nitrobenzoyl)haemanthamine (29j, corresponds to 28p) and 11-O-(4-nitrobenzoyl)haemanthamine (29k, related to 28q). Structures and purity of all newly synthetized derivatives were determined and confirmed by either LC-MS or GC-MS, by HRMS, one-dimensional and two-dimensional NMR, and optical rotation analyses. Data obtained from these analyses were completely consistent with the suggested structures. Similar to our previous reports focused on ambelline/haemanthamine derivatives and their ability to inhibit human cholinesterases associated with Alzheimer’s disease treatment [41,43,44], the substituted aromatic acyl moiety was shown to be essential for the increased antiplasmodial activity in comparison to either ambelline itself or its aliphatic esters.

3.3. Antiplasmodial Activity of Selected Alkaloids and Derivatives

Because the antiplasmodial/antimalarial activity of several AmAs has been reported in the literature [36], twenty-eight AmA belonging to various structural types were screened for activity against the hepatic stage of infection caused by luciferase-expressing P. Berghei parasites. None of the selected alkaloids exhibited any relevant activity against P. Berghei hepatic stages. Some of the screened ambelline derivatives demonstrated promising activity, but, on the other side, the activity of haemanthamine derivatives was lower (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Ambelline derivatives that displayed activity up to 5 μM were selected for further IC50 determination. Compound 28t was also included in this list for comparison purposes, even though it showed lower activity than that of the other compounds. As depicted in Table 1, aliphatic esters of ambelline (28a–c) did not display any significant activity—except 11-O-pentanoylambelline (28d), which showed mild activity with an IC50 = 4.08 ± 1.78 μM. Conversely, most aromatic esters of ambelline (28e–r) showed more compelling results with IC50 values, ranging from 0.047 (28n) to 2.40 μM (28i). Although compounds 28s and 28t exhibited some antiplasmodial activity in the initial screening, this activity was not dose-dependent, which did not allow for the determination of their IC50. Interestingly, these are the only derivatives with chlorine substitution in their structure, as they are 11-O-(2-chloro-4-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28s) and 11-O-(4-chloro-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28t), respectively. All the aromatic esters showed higher activity against P. berghei liver stages than the used standard, primaquine (IC50 = 5.74 ± 0.86 μM). The most promising activity was displayed by 11-O-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28n) and 11-O-(3,5-dimethoxybenzoyl) ambelline (28m), with IC50 values in the nanomolar range—0.047 ± 0.000 µM and 0.048 ± 0.014 µM, respectively. Both of these compounds showed certain cytotoxic potential in screening concentrations, but, as shown in Figure 6, the cell viability was not affected at antiplasmodial-active concentrations. Other remarkably active derivatives were 11-O-(3,5-dimethylbenzoyl)ambelline (28h, IC50 = 0.100 ± 0.018 µM), 11-O-(3,4-dimethoxybenzoyl) ambelline (28l, IC50 = 0.147 ± 0.018 µM), and 11-O-(3-methoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28j, IC50 = 0.261 ± 0.090 µM). Compounds that presented the highest activity towards the hepatic stage of P. berghei infection were further tested for their potential impact on the subsequent blood stage of infection. None of the studied compounds displayed activity against the human-infective parasite P. falciparum blood stages at the tested concentrations compared to the used standard, chloroquine (CQ; Figure 7). These results suggest a liver stage-specific activity for these compounds, which may result from their action on a parasite target or host factor that is limited to this stage of infection, and this supports their further development as potential prophylactic agents.

3.4. Structure-Activity Relationships

Ambelline (28) has a 1,2,3,4,5-pentasubstituted benzene ring and belongs to the β-crinane type of AmA, while haemanthamine (29) has a 1,2,4,5-tetrasubstituted benzene ring and belongs to the α-crinane type of AmA. Both alkaloids have a S-configuration at C-11. Since neither haemanthamine nor ambelline showed inhibition, drawing a conclusion about their SAR might be misleading. However, some prepared derivatives of ambelline were shown to be potent inhibitors of the hepatic stage of Plasmodium infection (Figure 4), whereas the same esters of haemanthamine (Figure 5) did not display such activity. Thus, the spatial orientation of ambellines with 11-O-substitution on the β-crinane ethylene bridge is linked with the antiplasmodial activity. The most favorable substitution of ambelline’s benzoyl ester seems to be related to the C-3 together with the C-5 position of the benzoyl moiety. The 3,5-disubstitution of benzoyl with electron-donating groups (EDG: methyl 28h or methoxy 28m) significantly improved activity. Surprisingly, this EDG influence does not apply to the 3,5-diethoxybenzoyl derivative (28o), probably because of the steric effect of a longer alkyl chain of ether. Simply speaking, EDG-monosubstituted benzoyl derivatives were weaker inhibitors, as well as derivatives with an electron-withdrawing substitution (EWG: nitro group and chlorine 28p–t). The only tested derivative (28n) with a higher benzoyl substitution by three methoxy groups showed significant inhibition, comparable to that of the 3,5-disubstituted derivative 28m.

3.5. Cytotoxicity of Tested Compounds

Cytotoxicity of all isolated AmA and derivatives was screened on a set of ten various cell lines in our previous studies [32,38,40,48]. However, this set did not contain any liver-derived cell line. Since a crucial bottleneck of the Plasmodium life cycle takes place in the liver of the host, and, as stated above, ambelline esters showed exclusive inhibition of the plasmodial hepatic stage, and the evaluation of the hepatotoxic potential of the studied compounds was needed. The cytotoxicity of all studied compounds was indicatively screened during the antiplasmodial activity evaluation using the alamarBlue assay to avoid the false positivity associated with the cytotoxic effect of the tested compounds. In addition, a more thorough evaluation of the cytotoxic potential of the investigated compounds was carried out employing the MTT method. All compounds were screened at 10 μM using the hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cell line as a commonly used model for hepatotoxicity evaluation of xenobiotics and drug candidates. None of the screened compounds in the tested concentration (10 μM) lowered the cell viability below 50%, except for compound 28t, which decreased the viability by up to 15% compared to the non-treated control (Figure 8, Table 1). As mentioned above, this compound was excluded from the IC50 determination because of its dose-independent activity.

4. Conclusions

Twenty-eight Amaryllidaceae alkaloids belonging to seven structural types were shown to lack activity against the hepatic stage of P. berghei infection. However, since two alkaloids, ambelline (28) and haemanthamine (29), were isolated in abundant amounts, the preparation of semisynthetic derivatives led to a SAR study with respect to their antiplasmodial activity. Consequently, several aromatic esters of ambelline have displayed specific activity against the hepatic stage of P. berghei infection. Regarding the structure–activity relationship, the spatial orientation of the ethylene bridge (β-crinane type AmA), together with the 11-O-substitution, are responsible for the antiplasmodial activity, since haemanthamine derivatives did not show comparable inhibition. The most significant activity, shown by 11-O-(3,5-dimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28m) and 11-O-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28n), is apparently associated with the 3,5-dimethoxy substitution pattern of the ambelline’s benzoyl ester. Additionally, except for 28t, none of the evaluated compounds was significantly cytotoxic to the HepG2 cell line at 10 μM. This study demonstrated that ambelline derivatives are worthy candidates for further antiplasmodial studies, especially in terms of expanding the portfolio of drugs that can be used to eradicate dormant forms of parasites.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031007/s1, interpretations of 1H, 13C and ESI-HRMS of new ambelline derivatives (28h, m, n, r, s, t); Figure S1 ESI-HRMS of 11-O-(3,5-dimethylbenzoyl)ambelline (28h); Figure S2 1H NMR spectrum of 11-O-(3,5-dimethylbenzoyl)ambelline (28h); Figure S3 13C NMR spectrum of 11-O-(3,5-dimethylbenzoyl)ambelline (28h); Figure S4 ESI-HRMS of 11-O-(3,5-dimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28m); Figure S5 1H NMR spectrum of 11-O-(3,5-dimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28m); Figure S6 13C NMR spectrum of 11-O-(3,5-dimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28m); Figure S7 ESI-HRMS of 11-O-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28n); Figure S8 1H NMR spectrum of 11-O-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28n); Figure S9 13C NMR spectrum of 11-O-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28n); Figure S10 ESI-HRMS of 11-O-(4-methyl-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28r); Figure S11 1H NMR spectrum of 11-O-(4-methyl-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28r); Figure S12 13C NMR spectrum of 11-O-(4-methyl-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28r); Figure S13 ESI-HRMS of 11-O-(2-chloro-4-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28s); Figure S14 1H NMR spectrum of 11-O-(2-chloro-4-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28s); Figure S15 13C NMR spectrum of 11-O-(2-chloro-4-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28s); Figure S16 ESI-HRMS of 11-O-(4-chloro-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28t); Figure S17 1H NMR spectrum of 11-O-(4-chloro-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28t); Figure S18 13C NMR spectrum of 11-O-(4-chloro-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28t).

Author Contributions

K.H.B., D.S., M.Š., A.H. and R.V. contributed to the isolation of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids; A.R., E.K. and R.P. contributed to the synthesis of the ambelline and haemanthamine derivatives; J.K. contributed to the measurement and interpretation of NMR spectra; K.H.B., D.F. (Diana Fontinha) and D.F. (Denise Francisco) contributed to the measurement of antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxicity of the isolated alkaloids and derivatives; K.H.B. and D.F. (Diana Fontinha) wrote the manuscript; M.P. and L.C. designed the study, supervised the laboratory work, and contributed to the critical revisions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by pre-application research into the innovative medicines and medical technologies project co-funded by the European Union (reg. No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/18_069/0010046) and by Charles University grants (SVV UK 260 548, GA UK Nr. 328121).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Gerald Blunden for critical reading of the manuscript and for corrections of English, Jiří Kuneš for performing of NMR analysis, and Lucie Nováková for recording of the HRMS of new derivatives.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2021; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Suh, K.N.; Kain, K.C.; Keystone, J.S. Malaria. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2004, 170, 1693–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Snow, R.W.; Guerra, C.A.; Noor, A.M.; Myint, H.Y.; Hay, S.I. The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 2005, 434, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Thu, A.M.; Phyo, A.P.; Landier, J.; Parker, D.M.; Nosten, F.H. Combating multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Perkins, S.L. Malaria’s many mates: Past, present, and future of the systematics of the order Haemosporida. J. Parasitol. 2014, 100, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ashley, E.A.; Pyae Phyo, A.; Woodrow, C.J. Malaria. Lancet 2018, 391, 1608–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Agop-Nersesian, C.; Niklaus, L.; Wacker, R.; Heussler, V.T. Host cell cytosolic immune response during Plasmodium liver stage development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Kumar, S.; Bhardwaj, T.R.; Prasad, D.N.; Singh, R.K. Drug targets for resistant malaria: Historic to future perspectives. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 104, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Frevert, U. Sneaking in through the back entrance: The biology of malaria liver stages. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fontinha, D.; Moules, I.; Prudêncio, M. Repurposing drugs to fight hepatic malaria parasites. Molecules 2020, 25, 3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cowman, A.F.; Healer, J.; Marapana, D.; Marsh, K. Malaria: Biology and disease. Cell 2016, 167, 610–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rodrigues, T.; Prudêncio, M.; Moreira, R.; Mota, M.M.; Lopes, F. Targeting the liver stage of malaria parasites: A yet unmet goal. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 995–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mota, M.M.; Rodriguez, A. New pieces for the malaria liver stage puzzle: Where will they fit? Cell Host Microbe 2008, 3, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Alam, A.; Goyal, M.; Iqbal, M.S.; Pal, C.; Dey, S.; Bindu, S.; Maity, P.; Bandyopadhyay, U. Novel antimalarial drug targets: Hope for new antimalarial drugs. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2009, 2, 469–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Daily, J. Malaria 2017: Update on the clinical literature and management. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2017, 19, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Uthman, O.A.; Graves, P.M.; Saunders, R.; Gelband, H.; Richardson, M.; Garner, P. Safety of primaquine given to people with G6PD deficiency: Systematic review of prospective studies. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Dean, L.; Kane, M. Tafenoquine therapy and G6PD genotype. In Medical Genetics Summaries; Pratt, V.M., Scott, S.A., Pirmohamed, M., Eds.; National Center for Biotechnology Information: Bethesda, ML, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kappe, S.H.; Duffy, P.E. Malaria liver stage culture: In Vitro veritas? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006, 74, 706–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Antony, H.A.; Parija, S.C. Antimalarial drug resistance: An overview. Trop. Parasitol. 2016, 6, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mvumbi, D.M.; Bobanga, T.L.; Kayembe, J.-M.N.; Mvumbi, G.L.; Situakibanza, H.N.-T.; Benoit-Vical, F.; Melin, P.; De Mol, P.; Hayette, M.-P. Molecular surveillance of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapies in the Democratic Republic of Congo. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Septembre-Malaterre, A.; Lalarizo Rakoto, M.; Marodon, C.; Bedoui, Y.; Nakab, J.; Simon, E.; Hoarau, L.; Savriama, S.; Strasberg, D.; Guiraud, P.; et al. Artemisia annua, a traditional plant brought to light. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ariey, F.; Witkowski, B.; Amaratunga, C.; Beghain, J.; Langlois, A.-C.; Khim, N.; Kim, S.; Duru, V.; Bouchier, C.; Ma, L.; et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 2014, 505, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nosten, F.; White, N.J. Artemisinin-based combination treatment of falciparum malaria. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2007, 77, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pazhayam, N.M.; Chhibber-Goel, J.; Sharma, A. New leads for drug repurposing against malaria. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 24, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kaiser, M.; Mäser, P.; Tadoori, L.P.; Ioset, J.R.; Brun, R. Antiprotozoal activity profiling of approved drugs: A starting point toward drug repositioning. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nyunt, M.M.; Nguyen, V.K.; Kajubi, R.; Huang, L.; Ssebuliba, J.; Kiconco, S.; Mwima, M.W.; Achan, J.; Aweeka, F.; Parikh, S.; et al. Artemether-lumefantrine pharmacokinetics and clinical response are minimally altered in pregnant ugandan women treated for uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 60, 1274–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. World Flora Online. Available online: http://worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-7000000018#feedbackModal (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  29. Berkov, S.; Osorio, E.; Viladomat, F.; Bastida, J. Chemodiversity, chemotaxonomy and chemoecology of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. In The Alkaloids, 1st ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 83, pp. 113–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nair, J.; van Staden, J. Antiplasmodial studies within the plant family Amaryllidaceae. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X1987293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soto-Vásquez, M.R.; Horna-Pinedo, M.V.; Tallini, L.R.; Bastida, J. Chemical composition and in vitro antiplasmodial activity of the total alkaloids of the bulbs of two Amaryllidaceae species from northern Peru. Pharmacogn. J. 2021, 13, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cahlíková, L.; Kawano, I.; Řezáčová, M.; Blunden, G.; Hulcová, D.; Havelek, R. The Amaryllidaceae alkaloids haemanthamine, haemanthidine and their semisynthetic derivatives as potential drugs. Phytochem. Rev. 2021, 20, 303–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gonring-Salarini, K.; Conti, R.; Andrade, J.P.; Borges, B.J.P.; Aguiar, A.C.; de Souza, J.O.; Zanini, C.L.; Oliva, G.; Tenorio, J.C.; Ellena, J.; et al. In vitro antiplasmodial activities of alkaloids isolated from roots of Worsleya procera (Lem.) Traub (Amaryllidaceae). J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2019, 30, 1624–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cho, N.; Du, Y.; Valenciano, A.L.; Fernández-Murga, M.L.; Goetz, M.; Clement, J.; Cassera, M.B.; Kingston, D.G.I. Antiplasmodial alkaloids from bulbs of Amaryllis belladonna Steud. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Akinyele, S.T.; Elusiyan, C.A.; Omisore, N.O.; Adewunmi, C.O. Antimalarial activities and alkaloids from Crinum jagus (Thomps) DANDY. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 296, 115359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tajuddeen, N.; Van Heerden, F.R. Antiplasmodial natural products: An update. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Vaněčková, N.; Hošťálková, A.; Šafratová, M.; Kuneš, J.; Hulcová, D.; Hrabinová, M.; Doskočil, I.; Štěpánková, Š.; Opletal, L.; Nováková, L.; et al. Isolation of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids from Nerine bowdenii W. Watson and their biological activities. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 80114–80120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Šafratová, M.; Hošťálková, A.; Hulcová, D.; Breiterová, K.; Hrabcová, V.; Machado, M.; Fontinha, D.; Prudêncio, M.; Kuneš, J.; Chlebek, J.; et al. Alkaloids from Narcissus poeticus cv. Pink Parasol of various structural types and their biological activity. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2018, 41, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hulcová, D.; Maříková, J.; Korábečný, J.; Hošťálková, A.; Jun, D.; Kuneš, J.; Chlebek, J.; Opletal, L.; De Simone, A.; Nováková, L.; et al. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids from Narcissus pseudonarcissus L. cv. Dutch Master as potential drugs in treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Phytochemistry 2019, 165, 112055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Breiterová, K.; Koutová, D.; Maříková, J.; Havelek, R.; Kuneš, J.; Majorošová, M.; Opletal, L.; Hošťálková, A.; Jenčo, J.; Řezáčová, M.; et al. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids of different structural types from Narcissus L. cv. Professor Einstein and their cytotoxic activity. Plants 2020, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Maříková, J.; Ritomská, A.; Korábečný, J.; Peřinová, R.; Al Mamun, A.; Kučera, T.; Kohelová, E.; Hulcová, D.; Kobrlová, T.; Kuneš, J.; et al. Aromatic esters of the crinane amaryllidaceae alkaloid ambelline as selective inhibitors of butyrylcholinesterase. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Viladomat, F.; Codina, C.; Bastida, J.; Mathee, S.; Campbell, W.E. Further alkaloids from Brunsvigia josephinae. Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 961–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kohelová, E.; Peřinová, R.; Maafi, N.; Korábečný, J.; Hulcová, D.; Maříková, J.; Kučera, T.; Martínez González, L.; Hrabinová, M.; Vorčáková, K.; et al. Derivatives of the β-crinane amaryllidaceae alkaloid haemanthamine as multi-target directed ligands for alzheimer’s disease. Molecules 2019, 24, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Peřinová, R.; Maafi, N.; Korábečný, J.; Kohelová, E.; De Simone, A.; Al Mamun, A.; Hulcová, D.; Marková, J.; Kučera, T.; Jun, D.; et al. Functionalized aromatic esters of the Amaryllidaceae alkaloid haemanthamine and their in vitro and in silico biological activity connected to Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 100, 103928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Prudêncio, M.; Mota, M.M.; Mendes, A.M. A toolbox to study liver stage malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2011, 27, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ploemen, I.H.J.; Prudêncio, M.; Douradinha, B.G.; Ramesar, J.; Fonager, J.; van Gemert, G.-J.; Luty, A.J.F.; Hermsen, C.C.; Saurwein, R.W.; Baptista, F.G.; et al. Visualisation and quantitative analysis of the rodent malaria liver stage by real time imaging. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Singh, L.; Fontinha, D.; Francisco, D.; Mendes, A.M.; Prudêncio, M.; Singh, K. Molecular design and synthesis of ivermectin hybrids targeting hepatic and erythrocytic stages of Plasmodium parasites. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 1750–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Havelek, R.; Muthna, D.; Tomšík, P.; Královec, K.; Seifrtová, M.; Cahlíková, L.; Hošťálková, A.; Šafratová, M.; Perwein, M.; Čermáková, E.; et al. Anticancer potential of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids evaluated by screening with a panel of human cells, real-time cellular analysis and Ehrlich tumor-bearing mice. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2017, 275, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids tested against the hepatic stage of Plasmodium berghei infection in vitro.
Figure 1. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids tested against the hepatic stage of Plasmodium berghei infection in vitro.
Pharmaceutics 15 01007 g001
Figure 2. Synthesis of aliphatic (28a–d) and aromatic (28e–t) esters of ambelline.
Figure 2. Synthesis of aliphatic (28a–d) and aromatic (28e–t) esters of ambelline.
Pharmaceutics 15 01007 g002
Figure 3. Overview of tested aliphatic and aromatic esters of haemanthamine (29).
Figure 3. Overview of tested aliphatic and aromatic esters of haemanthamine (29).
Pharmaceutics 15 01007 g003
Figure 4. Screening of inhibitory activity of ambelline derivatives against the hepatic stage of Plasmodium berghei in Huh-7 cell line.
Figure 4. Screening of inhibitory activity of ambelline derivatives against the hepatic stage of Plasmodium berghei in Huh-7 cell line.
Pharmaceutics 15 01007 g004
Figure 5. Screening of inhibitory activity of haemanthamine derivatives against the hepatic stage of Plasmodium berghei in Huh-7 cell line.
Figure 5. Screening of inhibitory activity of haemanthamine derivatives against the hepatic stage of Plasmodium berghei in Huh-7 cell line.
Pharmaceutics 15 01007 g005
Figure 6. Inhibition of hepatic stage of Plasmodium berghei in Huh-7 cell line—IC50 determination of two the most active compounds—28m and 28n.
Figure 6. Inhibition of hepatic stage of Plasmodium berghei in Huh-7 cell line—IC50 determination of two the most active compounds—28m and 28n.
Pharmaceutics 15 01007 g006
Figure 7. Screening of blood stage inhibitory activity (Plasmodium falciparum ring-stage in blood).
Figure 7. Screening of blood stage inhibitory activity (Plasmodium falciparum ring-stage in blood).
Pharmaceutics 15 01007 g007
Figure 8. Screening of cytotoxic potential of ambelline derivatives at 10 μM concentration on HepG2 cell line.
Figure 8. Screening of cytotoxic potential of ambelline derivatives at 10 μM concentration on HepG2 cell line.
Pharmaceutics 15 01007 g008
Table 1. Activity of ambelline derivatives against the hepatic stage of malaria caused by P. berghei and their cytotoxic potential.
Table 1. Activity of ambelline derivatives against the hepatic stage of malaria caused by P. berghei and their cytotoxic potential.
CompoundIC50 P. berghei [µM]HepG2 [%] 1
(c = 10 µM)
Ambelline (28)>1050 ± 1
11-O-Acetylambelline (28a)>10107 ± 3
11-O-Propionylambelline (28b)>1058 ± 4
11-O-Isobutanoylambelline (28c)>1095 ± 6
11-O-Pentanoylambelline (28d)4.08 ± 1.7871 ± 7
11-O-Benzoylambelline (28e)0.726 ± 0.12695 ± 7
11-O-(3-Methylbenzoyl)ambelline (28f)0.317 ± 0.11875 ± 1
11-O-(4-Methylbenzoyl)ambelline (28g)0.402 ± 0.08150 ± 6
11-O-(3,5-Dimethylbenzoyl)ambelline (28h)0.100 ± 0.01874 ± 13
11-O-(2-Methoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28i)2.40 ± 0.7786 ± 2
11-O-(3-Methoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28j)0.261 ± 0.09081 ± 10
11-O-(4-Methoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28k)0.451 ± 0.00788 ± 2
11-O-(3,4-Dimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28l)0.147 ± 0.01899 ± 9
11-O-(3,5-Dimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28m)0.048 ± 0.01487 ± 6
11-O-(3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28n)0.047 ± 0.00052 ± 2
11-O-(3,5-Diethoxybenzoyl)ambelline (28o)0.316 ± 0.01356 ± 8
11-O-(3-Nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28p)1.53 ± 0.2275 ± 6
11-O-(4-Nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28q)1.20 ± 0.1853 ± 6
11-O-(4-Methyl-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28r)0.410 ± 0.05465 ± 8
11-O-(2-Chloro-4-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28s)not tested54 ± 6
11-O-(4-Chloro-3-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline (28t)not tested15 ± 2
Primaquine 25.74 ± 0.86-
Doxorubicine 2-66 ± 8
1 % of cell viability compared to non-treated control (100%); 2 Reference drug.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Breiterová, K.H.; Ritomská, A.; Fontinha, D.; Křoustková, J.; Suchánková, D.; Hošťálková, A.; Šafratová, M.; Kohelová, E.; Peřinová, R.; Vrabec, R.; et al. Derivatives of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloid Ambelline as Selective Inhibitors of Hepatic Stage of Plasmodium berghei Infection In Vitro. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031007

AMA Style

Breiterová KH, Ritomská A, Fontinha D, Křoustková J, Suchánková D, Hošťálková A, Šafratová M, Kohelová E, Peřinová R, Vrabec R, et al. Derivatives of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloid Ambelline as Selective Inhibitors of Hepatic Stage of Plasmodium berghei Infection In Vitro. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(3):1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Breiterová, Kateřina Hradiská, Aneta Ritomská, Diana Fontinha, Jana Křoustková, Daniela Suchánková, Anna Hošťálková, Marcela Šafratová, Eliška Kohelová, Rozálie Peřinová, Rudolf Vrabec, and et al. 2023. "Derivatives of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloid Ambelline as Selective Inhibitors of Hepatic Stage of Plasmodium berghei Infection In Vitro" Pharmaceutics 15, no. 3: 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031007

APA Style

Breiterová, K. H., Ritomská, A., Fontinha, D., Křoustková, J., Suchánková, D., Hošťálková, A., Šafratová, M., Kohelová, E., Peřinová, R., Vrabec, R., Francisco, D., Prudêncio, M., & Cahlíková, L. (2023). Derivatives of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloid Ambelline as Selective Inhibitors of Hepatic Stage of Plasmodium berghei Infection In Vitro. Pharmaceutics, 15(3), 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15031007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop