Next Article in Journal
Polymorphism and Multi-Component Crystal Formation of GABA and Gabapentin
Previous Article in Journal
Fluorescence Tracking of Small Extracellular Vesicles In Vivo
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Semi-Solid Self-Emulsifying Formulation of Aprepitant for Oral Delivery: An In Vitro Evaluation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chlorhexidine–Silver Nanoparticle Conjugation Leading to Antimicrobial Synergism but Enhanced Cytotoxicity

1
Department of Pharmaceutical Technologies, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria
2
Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria
3
Department of Virology, The Stephan Angeloff Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 26 G. Bonchev Str., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria
5
Department of Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria
6
Institute of Optical Materials and Technologies “Acad. Jordan Malinowski”, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. Georgi Bonchev Str., bl. 109, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(9), 2298; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092298
Submission received: 16 August 2023 / Revised: 2 September 2023 / Accepted: 7 September 2023 / Published: 9 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nano-Scale Drug Delivery Systems)

Abstract

:
This study explored the potential synergism within chlorhexidine–silver nanoparticle conjugates against Influenza type A, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans. Silver nanoparticles (SN) were obtained by the reduction of silver ions with green tea total phenolic extract and conjugated with chlorhexidine (Cx). The particles were characterized by UV-Vis and FTIR spectroscopies, dynamic light scattering, X-ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy. A stable negatively charged nano-silver colloid (ζ = −50.01) was obtained with an average hydrodynamic diameter of 92.34 nm. In the presence of chlorhexidine, the spectral data and the shift of the zeta potential to positive values (ζ = +44.59) revealed the successful sorption of the drug onto the silver surface. The conjugates (SN-Cx) demonstrated potentiation in their effects against S. aureus and C. albicans and synergism against E. coli with minimal inhibitory concentrations of SN at 5.5 µg/mL + Cx 8.8 µg/mL. The SN showed excellent virucidal properties, increasing with time, and demonstrated low toxicity. However, the coupling of the cationic chlorhexidine with nano-silver did not reduce its intrinsic cytotoxicity on various cell lines (MDCK, BJ, and A549). The newly synthesized antimicrobial agent exhibited an extended and promising therapeutic spectrum and needs to be further evaluated regarding the designated route of administration in three-dimensional cell models (e.g., nasal, bronchial, dermal, ocular, etc.).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the last few years, several reports have become available concerning the mutual or parallel utilization of silver nanoparticles (SN) and chlorhexidine (Cx) as a treatment/prophylactic strategy for specific infectious diseases. Both agents are widely studied and described in the literature as possessing distinct antimicrobial properties, which made a lot of scientists curious about a possible synergism, additive effects, or potentiation of their activities. Some interesting findings were reported by Zhou et al., who prepared a composite of poly(L-lactide) microcapsules of chlorhexidine with superficially adsorbed silver nanoparticles and found better antibacterial properties against E. coli and S. aureus with less usage of silver, compared to silver nanoparticles carrying non-drug loaded microcapsules [1]. Elsewhere, Myronov et al. reported that adding silver nanoparticles to chlorhexidine treatment improved infected wound healing through the acceleration of bacteria elimination (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus) and M2 macrophage polarization [2]. Pernakov et al. established the accelerated wound healing effect of silver nano-architectures and chlorhexidine when combined, compared with single treatments with both agents, but did not observe any synergism in the antibacterial activity against E. coli and P. aeruginosa [3]. Other authors reported synergism or the potentiation of SN and Cx against Candida spp. [4,5,6], Enterococcus faecalis [5,7], Klebsiella pneumonia [5], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [6,8], Staphylococcus epidermidis [6,8], and Streptococcus mutans [6,9]. To the best of our knowledge, yet to be cursorily addressed are the supramolecular interactions that may occur upon the addition of chlorhexidine to a nano-silver colloid, along with defining the nature of the resultant effects. It would be speculative to seek any controversy or agreement in all the findings above since the surface functionality of nano-silver is indeed the crucial factor for accessing their potential physicochemical and therapeutic properties. It depends highly on the preparation technique and the reducer that is used [10,11,12,13].
Today, due to their pronounced antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and anticancer properties, SN are considered highly potent multifunctional units with a broad application range (e.g., in nanomedicine, dentistry, ecology, the textile industry, cosmetics, etc.) [14,15,16,17]. Their antimicrobial activity is primarily owing to the silver ions (Ag+) released from the critically increased silver surface and subsequent oxidation or bonding to essential for the microorganisms’ vitality, adhesion, and replication molecular factors [18,19,20]. Ever since “green” synthetic methods were introduced, it has become a trend and a method of choice to obtain nano-silver colloids by reducing silver ions in dilute solutions of soluble silver salts with non-toxic reducers of natural origin—plant extracts, bacteria, yeast, and fungi [11,21]. Being a rich source of primary and secondary metabolic products, most of them serve not only as reducers but also as capping (stabilizing) agents [11,22]. However, for the same reason, the various biological methods lead to highly differentiating functionality (shape, size, charge, redox potential, and superficial organic load or “cap”) of the silver nanoparticles, affecting the efficiency of Ag+ release. Thus, depending on the reduction process and the surface properties, SN possess varying antimicrobial strength, toxicity, and, last but not least, the ability to conjugate with other substrates [11,23].
Chlorhexidine (Cx) is a broad-spectrum topical antiseptic with a biguanide structure and the behavior of a cationic surfactant in neutral and alkaline media. The antifungal properties of the compound are slightly less pronounced than its antibacterial properties [24,25]. Cx was considered a suitable substrate for conjugation to SN for several reasons: (1) when ionized, the molecule produces quaternary ammonium functional groups, which can easily contribute to the electrostatic adsorption of Cx on a negatively charged substrate [26,27] (such as green-synthesized nano-silver in most cases [28,29]); (2) the presence of multiple basic N atoms sets a prerequisite for coordination with the silver nuclei [30], whereas the acidic NH are expected to engage in hydrogen bonding with the available phenolic groups in the organic cap [31,32,33,34]. It is as yet unclear how these potential interactions may influence the therapeutic activity of SN and chlorhexidine itself, and whether they allow/determine potentiation or even synergistic action.
Our pilot study on “green” SN synthesis with green tea extracts confirmed the better stability and purity of nano-silver colloids when catechin-rich phenolic extract was used for the reduction of silver ions rather than using total aqueous green tea extract [35]. Furthermore, we obtained a clue regarding the synthesis’ optimal parameters and the colloidal stability. In the present study, we attempted to explore the production variables in more detail and establish the physicochemical nature of the resultant nano-silver colloids with a view to their conjunction with chlorhexidine. We hypothesized that in a conjugated form, Cx and SN may present synergistic activity against common pathogens, such as the Influenza virus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Sencha green tea was supplied by a local drugstore. Silver nitrate at >99.9% and sodium hydroxide pellets at >98% were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oxford, UK. Chlorhexidine diacetate salt hydrate at ≥ 98%, Mw 625.55 g/mol, was supplied from Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA; all organic solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) and were of analytical grade.

2.1.2. Bacteria and Fungi

The Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Candida albicans ATCC 10,231 reference strains (MicroSwab) were obtained from Ridacom, Sofia, Bulgaria. Brain Heart Infusion broth and blood–agar (HiMedia) were also purchased from Ridacom, Bulgaria.

2.1.3. Virus

Allantoic fluid and the cell-derived seasonal Influenza virus laboratory strains A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) (D. I. Ivanovsky Institute, Moscow, Russia) and A/Panama/07/99 (H3N2) (National Center for Infectious and Parasitic Diseases—NCIPD, Sofia, Bulgaria) were used at working doses of 100 CCID50/mL (T = 10–5.5 lg CCID50/mL).

2.1.4. Cells

Madine–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) (ATCC-CCL-34) and human lung carcinoma A549 (ATCC-CCL-185™) epithelial cell lines were kindly provided by Dr. Cyril Barbesange of the National Reference Center for Influenza, Sciensano, Belgium, as well as human diploid fibroblast cells BJ (ATCC-CRL-2522), kindly provided by Dr. Kameliya Vinketova of the Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction “Acad. Kiril Bratanov” in the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (IBIR-BAS), were used. Cells were seeded at a density of 2.5 × 105/mL at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator, the Thermo Forma 310 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), as a monolayer culture in 96-well plates (Corning® Costar®, Corning, NY, USA) in growth medium DMEM (Gibco, Waltham, MA USA) or RPMI (Sigma, Livonia, MI, USA) containing 5 and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco), 3.7 mg/mL sodium bicarbonate, 10 µM HEPES buffer (AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 25 µg/mL amphotericin B for 24 h until monolayer confluence was reached.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Green Tea Total Polyphenols Extraction

A catechins-rich total phenolic fraction from Sencha green tea was isolated, as reported previously [35]. For the purposes of the current study, a methodology described by Krishnaswamy was applied with slight modification [36]. Sencha green tea leaves were extracted with methanol, and the obtained filtrate was evaporated in a water bath. Then, 10 mL of water and sodium chloride at 10% were added to the dried extract. The mixture was placed in a separating funnel with 10 mL of ethyl acetate, then the combined ethyl acetate extracts were washed twice with water. After evaporation of the organic solvent, a mixture of catechins and other phenolic compounds was obtained.

2.2.2. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles (SN)

Silver ions were reduced with green tea phenolic fraction, following the protocol established in our pilot study [35]. Briefly, silver nitrate (AgNO3) solutions (1 mM and 2 mM) were obtained by dissolving the salt into distilled water under manual stirring at room temperature and via proper dilution afterward. The reductant, subsequently referred to as C8, was prepared in the form of a green tea polyphenol aqueous solution with varying concentrations of 0.6–6.0 mg/mL and was then alkalized to a pH of 8.0 with the aid of sodium hydroxide 10% solution (10–40 µL). The reaction vials were filled with 3.0 mL of silver nitrate solution, to which 0.5 mL of reductant was added. The mixtures were sealed and briefly shaken to homogenize the contents. The vials were left to rest under dark conditions and at ambient temperature overnight.
The silver nanosuspensions were purified from low-molecular-weight unreacted phenolic compounds and ions through a dialysis procedure, using Spectra/Por®2 dialysis membrane MWCO 12–14 kDa (Spectrum Laboratories, Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA). The membranes were prepared as recommended by the manufacturer. The sample was transferred to a dialysis bag at a volume of 10.5 mL (the contents of 3 reaction vials), immersed into 1000 mL dialysate (distilled water), and left under continuous stirring for 24 h. The process was conducted at room temperature and the sample was protected from the light environment. The resultant purified colloidal dispersion was evacuated from the dialysis bag with the help of a sterile syringe and a needle.
To preselect the most promising formulations, the samples were observed both visually, for colloidal stability (color, transparency, opalescence, turbidity, etc.), and spectrally to confirm silver nanoparticle formation and their relative concentrations for 7 days.

2.2.3. Determination of SN Concentration

The concentration of SN (mg/mL) was determined after the natural evaporation to dryness of 1.0 mL colloidal solution in an 8.0 cm in diameter open glass Petri dish. The dried sample was left in a desiccator for at least 1 h afterward. The change in mass of the glass Petri dish was recorded using an analytical balance. The experiment was performed in triplicate in a previously tempered room, with tempered samples at 25 °C.

2.2.4. Conjugation of SN and Chlorhexidine

An optimized formulation of silver nanoparticles (SN) was subjected to conjugation with chlorhexidine (Cx). For this purpose, an aqueous solution of chlorhexidine acetate (Mw 625.55 g/mol) at 3.75 mg/mL was prepared on a magnet stirrer (IKA® C-MAG HS 4, Staufen, Germany) and added in varying volumes (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mL) to a single reaction vial containing 3.5 mL of purified nano-silver suspension. The mixtures were sealed, briefly shaken to homogenize, and left to rest under dark conditions and ambient temperature. Whenever, during the tests, it was necessary to make a comparison with the silver nanoparticles before conjunction, equal volumes of distilled water (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mL) were added to the latter so that the nano-silver concentration in both conjugated and non-conjugated samples would be the same.

2.2.5. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

UV-Vis scans of the samples were carried out with a T60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (PG Instruments, Lutterworth, UK) in the spectral range from 220 to 800 nm; the spectral analysis was performed on the second day after preparation (i.e., after dialysis completion), and on the seventh day after preparation. Appropriate dilution (1:10 during SN optimization and 1:20 after conjunction with Cx) was carried out on all samples in advance. The total green tea phenolic extract and chlorhexidine acetate were also scanned for reference using the same spectral interval. UVWin 6.0 software was used for data curation and processing after taking the measurements in triplicate.

2.2.6. Dynamic Light Scattering/Laser Doppler Electrophoresis

The techniques of multi-angle dynamic light scattering (MADLS) and laser Doppler electrophoresis (LDE) were applied for the colloidal characterization of preselected SN samples and SN-Cx conjugated samples according to average size (hydrodynamic diameter—dH), size distribution, polydispersity, and zeta potential, respectively. Both studies were performed on a Zetasizer Ultra Red (λ = 632.8 nm) (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) at 25 °C. Data was processed and obtained with the aid of the ZS XPLORER 3.2.0.84 software. The samples were scanned on the second day after preparation and without any preliminary filtration.

2.2.7. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

TEM images were taken with a JEOL JEM 2100 (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.

2.2.8. FT-IR Study

The IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Tensor II FTIR spectrometer in the 3750–400 cm−1 spectral region, accumulated via 32 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1. A KBr tableting technique was used. The SN and SN-Cx samples were freeze-dried for the purpose without adding any stabilizers, e.g., cryoprotectants, lyoprotectants, etc.

2.2.9. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD analysis was performed on SN and SN-Cx freeze-dried samples in a Panalytical Empyrean diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK). Chlorhexidine acetate crystalline powder was scanned for reference. The diffractograms were obtained by using a Cu-Kα source (λ = 1.5406 Å). The measurements were performed at a 1 s/step scanning rate, with a step size of 0.013°.

2.2.10. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity

The antibacterial and antifungal activity of SN, Cx, and SN-Cx samples were tested against the Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Candida albicans ATCC 10,231 reference strains. The stock concentrations of the active agents were set at 0.7 mg/mL for SN samples, 1.13 mg/mL for Cx samples, and 0.7 mg/mL + 1.13 mg/mL for SN-Cx samples, respectively. A serial 2-fold dilution method was applied to eight test tubes in a row containing 1.0 mL Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth. The resultant test concentrations were in the range of a 1:2 to 1:256 dilution of the stock solutions. Next, 0.1 mL of microbial suspension standardized to 0.5 McFarland turbidity equivalent was added to the vials. Samples of 1.0 mL of BHI broth contaminated with 0.1 mL microbial suspension of each strain were used as a positive control, whereas negative controls were set by mixing 1.0 mL of BHI broth with each active agent. All tests were repeated in triplicate. The test vials containing S. aureus and E. coli were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and those with C. albicans were incubated for 48 h at 35 °C. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each substrate was determined thereafter as the lowest active concentration in which no visible turbidity was observed. The fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) of Cx and SN were calculated as:
FICCx = MIC (Cx in the presence of SN)/MIC (Cx alone)
FICSN = MIC (SN in the presence of Cx)/MIC (SN alone)
The following values were taken into consideration in the interpretation of the results: an FIC index of <0.5 indicates synergism, while >0.5–1 shows additive effects, >1 to <2 shows indifference, and ≥2 is considered to be antagonism [37].
Minimal bactericidal/fungicidal concentrations (MBC/MFC) were determined by transferring all test suspensions with no visible turbidity in a single bacterial-loop volume onto blood agar. The specimens thus obtained were incubated again under the same conditions described above. The lowest concentration at which bacterial/fungal growth appeared to be inhibited 99.9% was reported as MBC/MFC.

2.2.11. Cytotoxicity (CC50) and Antiviral Effect (IC50 and SI) Evaluation via a Neutral Red (NR) Uptake Assay

After infection of the cell monolayer and treatment with each of the active agents in a respective dilution of the stock solutions (starting from 1:10 and following a two-fold step), the 96-well plates (including the virus and toxicity controls) were incubated in a thermostat at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 72 h. The treatment effect was first assessed visually under a microscope and then assessed by staining with NR dye [38]. The light absorbance of the samples was read at 540 nm on a microplate reader (Biotek Organon, West Chester, PA, USA).
The values that were obtained were used to calculate the percentage of cell protection by applying the formula:
% (CPE) inhibition = [ODtest sample − ODvirus control]/[ODtoxicity control − ODvirus control] × 100,
where CPE stands for cytopathic effect and OD stands for optical density.
Toxicity was calculated as a percentage of untreated cell controls. The values obtained were used to calculate CC50, IC50, and SI. The concentration of the substance that causes 50% damage to cells after treatment is referred to as the 50% cytotoxic concentration or CC50. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) is defined as the concentration of the substance that reduces viral replication by 50% compared to the untreated viral control. The selectivity index (SI) is represented by the CC50/IC50 ratio.

2.2.12. Determination of the Effect on Extracellular Virions—Virucidal Effect

Equivalent volumes of 100 CCID50/mL virus suspension and the test samples (SN, Cx, or SN-Cx) were contacted in a 1:1 ratio and incubated at room temperature for different time intervals (5, 15, 30, and 60 min). The active agents were applied at their maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) or in two-fold and, correspondingly, ten-fold dilutions, as follows:
  • SN 35 μg/mL (MTC) or 350 μg/mL (2-fold dilution of stock solution);
  • Cx 2 μg/mL (MTC) or 113 μg/mL (10-fold dilution of stock solution);
  • SN-Cx 1.2/2 μg/mL (MTC) or 70/113 μg/mL (10-fold dilution of stock solution).
The samples were then titrated using the end-point dilution method in a 24-h cell monolayer, starting either directly from the contact sample (when applying MTC) or after an initial ten-fold dilution of the contact sample (incubated with 2-fold- or 10-fold-diluted stock solution), with the content of the residual infectious virus being assessed at 72 h post-infection by visual reading of the cytopathic effect under an inverted microscope and via an NR uptake assay. Differences in CPE, denoted as Δlg, were recorded between the treated groups and the control virus suspension, incubated for the same time intervals in the absence of the active agents.

2.2.13. Statistical Data Processing

The experiments were performed in two and three replicates to ensure statistical reliability of the results. Data was processed using the software Gen5® 2018, Microsoft Excel® 2016, Origin 8.5® and GraphPad Prism 6.0®.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Silver Nanoparticle Synthesis, Optimization, and Conjunction

All test formulations resulted in the formation of nano-silver, recognized by the immediate change in color to the yellow-reddish-brown scale and the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) peak, manifesting in the range of 413–430 nm in all UV-Vis spectra. According to the spectral data (particularly, the absorption at the wavelength of the SPR extremum), the darkness of the color was found to correspond well with the concentration of the colloids. The highest nanosilver concentration with no visible signs of turbidity and/or sedimentation was established with sample 2C8R4.5, obtained in 2 mM of silver nitrate solution with green tea polyphenols (C8) at 4.5 mg/mL. Table 1 summarizes the information for all test compositions and the obtained UV-Vis spectral data; in Figure 1, the visual appearance of the samples over 7 days can be followed.
The colloidal stability of samples 2C8R [1.5–4.5] was confirmed via zeta potential analysis. With the zeta potential of sample 2C8R4.5 being the highest among all the samples according to absolute value [−50.01 mV], the initial observation was confirmed for it to be the composition of choice for further analyses and conjunction with Cx. Through evaporation to dryness, the nano-silver content (including the organic load) in the sample in question was established to be 1.005 ± 0.012 mg/mL.
As expected, upon the successful sorption of chlorhexidine diacetate (Cx) onto the silver nanoparticles’ surface, the colloids acquired a positive zeta potential; favorably for the purposes of this study, the latter was found to reach maximal absolute values in samples obtained with the highest investigated drug load, i.e., 1.5 mL of Cx 3.75 mg/mL solution. At such a dilution of the colloid, the nano-silver concentration drops to 0.7 mg/mL. Table 2 summarizes the data from the zeta potential measurements.
The electron microscopy and the dynamic light scattering results confirmed a significant enlargement of the conjugated particles’ diameter and hydrodynamic diameter (dH)m compared to the SN alone. These observations are in accordance with the shift in the SPR peak of the conjugates to higher values (SN λmax = 421 nm < SN-Cx λmax = 439 nm). Macroscopically, the conjugated nanosuspension generally retained the visual appearance of the unconjugated sample but presented slightly more pronounced opalescence. Negligible amounts of sediment were repeatedly observed after a few days of storage but the sediment was easily resuspended upon shaking. Figure 2A,B shows the UV spectra, TEM micrographs, zeta potential distribution, and size analysis by the hydrodynamic diameter of SN sample 2C8R4.5, and the optimal SN-Cx conjugated form, namely, 2C8R4.5Cx+++.

3.2. FTIR Spectroscopy

In the infrared spectrum of the phenolic extract (Figure 3), multiple bands of relatively high intensity, which are characteristic of the four catechin diastereoisomers, were observed at 1627, 1625, 1612, 1520, 1240, 1202, 1145, 1096, and 1037 cm−1 [39]. Bands falling in the range of 1400 to 1650 cm−1 are considered to be characteristic of the catechin’s aromatic (benzenoid) residues [40]. In the same spectrum, the remaining high-intensity bands (with maxima at 1037, 1145, 1240, and 1285 cm−1) are associated with the inherent phenolic and alcohol groups of C–O stretching and δ(O–H) vibrations, and those registered at the higher wavelengths (at 766 and 823 cm−1) are associated with the out-of-plane Car–H modes.
In the spectrum of the SN sample, the presence was observed of all the absorption bands mentioned above, which are characteristic of the phenolic extract used. Regarding the reason for the preserved IR catechin imprint in the spectrum of the SN sample, we would suggest the tendency of catechins to sorb on the surface of metal nanoparticles that were formed with their participation [29]. It should be noted that in the spectrum of the sample in question, the appearance of bands characteristic of the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of NO2 groups (at 1558 and 1384 cm−1) was also registered. As an additional but debatable indication of the presence of the latter, we would point to the presence of the low-intensity band at 833 cm−1, which represents a band characteristic of Car–NO2 oscillations. The reason for the existence of this functional group will not be discussed here, but it is assumed that in the course of the imposed redox process, the nitration of the organic substrate also takes place.
Moreover, as shown when comparing the spectra of the Cx and SN-Cx samples, the presence of the used anti-infective drug in the composition of the target nanoparticles was established.

3.3. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

The X-ray diffractograms of the silver nanoparticles (SN), their conjugates with chlorhexidine (SN-Cx), and chlorhexidine acetate (Cx) are shown in Figure 4. Recognizable in the conjugated and non-conjugated nanoparticles’ spectra is the standard diffraction pattern of elemental silver (Ag), with face-centered cubic symmetry. The latter is distinguished by reflections at 2θ 38°, 44°, 64°, and 77°, corresponding to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes [41,42,43,44]. The broad scattering and the lack of sharp, intense peaks in the SN and SN-Cx spectra reveal the substantial presence of amorphous matter and the small crystallite size [41,43]. None of the intrinsic chlorhexidine diffraction peaks (e.g., 2θ 19.8°, 20.4°, and 25.1°) [45,46,47] was evident in the conjugated nano-silver form; this observation confirms the amorphization of the drug upon loading onto the metal delivery platforms. The presence of crystalline silver oxide—Ag2O, the recognized standard being intense reflections at 28° and 32° of the (110) and (111) planes [48,49,50]—was not detected in the nano samples. However, an extra peak was recorded in the X-ray spectrum of SN at 29°, which might be a result of catechin crystalline segments in the sample [51], which are spectrally disguised or amorphized in the presence of chlorhexidine.

3.4. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity

3.4.1. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The inhibitory activity of SN alone against E. coli was recorded at relatively high concentrations of 175 µg/mL (e.g., dilution 1:4); antimicrobial activity against the other two pathogens—S. aureus and C. albicans—did not manifest at the investigated concentrations. It is worth mentioning that a slight opalescence was observed even within the negative controls with SN, which directed our attention to the MBC/MFC results. Such an opalescence is likely a result of the colloidal instability of the SN samples in the electrolyte-rich fluid growth medium.
When Cx was tested alone, MICs of 35.3 µg/mL (dilution 1:32) against E. coli and 17.7 µg/mL (dilution 1:64) against S. aureus and C. albicans were established. The SN-Cx conjugates exceeded these results by demonstrating MIC against all strains at SN 5.5 µg/mL + Cx 8.8 µg/mL (dilution 1:128). Only vials from the last in-row tested concentrations, corresponding to the 1:256 dilutions, remained turbid. The negative controls here were clear and transparent.

3.4.2. Minimal Bactericidal/Fungicidal Concentration (MBC/MFC)

The MBC/MFC study confirmed the lack of antimicrobial activity of SN alone against S. aureus and C. albicans, whereas the established MIC against E. coli, 175 µg/mL, was also shown to correspond to the MBC. The results from the MBC/MFC tests of the Cx and SN-Cx conjugates are presented in Figure 5 and are summarized in Table 3.
According to these results, the conjugates (SN-Cx) demonstrate synergism against E. coli, S. aureus, and C. albicans. Due to the lack of established activity of SN alone against S. aureus and C. albicans, the interaction therein could be further defined as potentiation [52]. Additionally, we have confirmed the observations of other authors that Gram-negative microorganisms are, in general, more susceptible to the presence of silver nanoparticles than Gram-positive bacteria, which is likely due to the thicker cellular wall–peptidoglycan layer of the latter and the consequently restricted penetration of Ag+ [53,54].

3.5. Cytotoxicity, Antiviral, and Virucidal Activity

The results for CC50, IC50, SI, and virucidal activity (Δlg) of the SN, Cx, and SN-Cx samples are presented in Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6.
The as-determined CC50 values of SN in MDCK, A549, and BJ cell cultures—56.4, 60.7, and 16.9 μg/mL, respectively—reveal SN as an active agent with relatively low to moderate toxicity. In MDCK cells, the CC50 of Cx alone was 2.6 and was 2.5 μg/mL in the conjugated form of SN-Cx. In A549 cell cultures, the same respective values were 5.3 and 5.8 μg/mL, while in human BJ fibroblasts, they were 2.2 and 2.4 μg/mL. According to these results, Cx and the Cx-bearing conjugated form (SN-Cx) could be defined as agents with high toxicity. SN showed a weak effect on the replication of the A/Aichi/2/68 virus, with a mean IC50 = 43.6 μg/mL and SI = 1.29. In the applied concentrations, the Cx and SN-Cx samples did not affect the replication of the Influenza virus A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) in MDCK cell cultures in a dose-response experimental design.
A strong virucidal effect was established at an SN MTC of 35 μg/mL with a duration from 5 to 60 min. The absence of a virucidal effect of Cx and SN-Cx against the investigated Influenza strain A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) is probably due to the low working concentrations of 2 μg/mL for Cx and 1.2/2 μg/mL for SN-Cx, respectively, which were applied because of the substrates’ high toxicity.
The distinguished time-dependent virucidal effect of SN was also confirmed against the Influenza strain A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2), at a working concentration of 350 μg/mL upon contact and following ten-fold dilution prior to titration in the cell monolayer. The virucidal activity of Cx and SN-Cx against the Influenza A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2) virus was assessed as weak (5 and 15 min) to moderate (30 and 60 min) when higher concentrations (than those in the former experiment with the A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) strain) were in contact with the virus, namely, Cx 113.0 μg/mL and SN-Cx 70.0/113.0 μg/mL, respectively. Before titration in the cell monolayer, additional ten-fold dilutions were still performed so that non-toxic concentrations were applied. However, the residual toxicity of the Cx and SN-Cx preparations in the greater dilutions and respective interference with the CPE could explain the established lower virucidal activity compared to that in SN alone.

4. Conclusions

Chlorhexidine diacetate was successfully adsorbed onto the “green”-synthesized silver nanoparticles’ negatively charged surface. The thus-obtained colloidal solution retained satisfactory physical stability for the duration of the survey. The resultant conjugates presented enhanced antimicrobial activity, judging by the results for common pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans. The addition of nano-silver to chlorhexidine solution significantly decreased the minimal bactericidal/fungicidal concentrations for all tested bacteria and fungi. Moreover, the fungicidal activity of chlorhexidine alone against C. albicans was not established at the investigated concentrations, whereas the unconjugated silver nanoparticles were not shown to inhibit or kill S. aureus and C. albicans independently. As expected, the cationic surfactant chlorhexidine exhibited high toxicity on the Madine–Darby canine kidney line, human fibroblasts, and lung carcinoma cells; this was despite the much lower applied active concentrations (0.00004–0.11%) compared to those in commercial topical antiseptic products (0.02–0.2%). The effect did not attenuate upon the conjugation of the drug to nano-silver vehicles, which limited the active concentration range to be tested for antiviral and virucidal activity on Influenza type A. The unconjugated silver nanoparticles, on the other hand, demonstrated good tolerability and low toxicity. Therefore, a relatively high concentration of 35 μg/mL was applied and showed a weak antiviral effect but distinct virucidal properties. Regardless of the latter ascertainments, the chlorhexidine–silver nanoparticle conjugate exhibited a pronounced synergistic action and an extended spectrum of antimicrobial activity. Therefore, it is relevant to test the applicability and efficacy of this promising newly synthesized agent in the form of pharmaceutical dosage for dermal, nasal, oromucosal, and ocular administration. This prospect will require more specific and bio-relevant tolerability tests to be conducted on 3D and organoid cultures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.I.; methodology, N.I, N.E., L.S., I.K., I.S. and D.K.; software, N.I, L.S., and I.K.; validation, I.K. and V.A.; formal analysis, N.I, N.E., L.S. and I.K.; investigation, N.I, N.E., L.S., I.K. and D.K.; resources, N.I, N.E., L.S., I.K., I.S. and V.A.; data curation, N.I, N.E., L.S. and I.K.; writing—original draft preparation, N.I, N.E., L.S. and I.K.; writing—review and editing, V.A.; visualization, N.I.; supervision, V.A.; project administration, N.I. and V.A.; funding acquisition, N.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the “Nauka” Fund at the Medical University of Varna, Bulgaria, grant number: Project No. 20016.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The research equipment of Distributed Research Infrastructure INFRAMAT, part of the Bulgarian National Roadmap for Research Infrastructures, supported by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science, was used in this investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, Y.; Hu, K.; Guo, Z.; Fang, K.; Wang, X.; Yang, F.; Gu, N. PLLA microcapsules combined with silver nanoparticles and chlorhexidine acetate showing improved antibacterial effect. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 78, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Myronov, P.; Sulaieva, O.; Korniienko, V.; Banasiuk, R.; Vielikov, M.; Husak, Y.; Pernakov, M.; Deineka, V.; Yusupova, A.; Hristova, M.-T.; et al. Combination of Chlorhexidine and Silver Nanoparticles: An Efficient Wound Infection and Healing Control System. BioNanoScience 2021, 11, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pernakov, M.; Ermini, M.L.; Sulaieva, O.; Cassano, D.; Santucci, M.; Husak, Y.; Korniienko, V.; Giannone, G.; Yusupova, A.; Liubchak, I.; et al. Complementary Effect of Non-Persistent Silver Nano-Architectures and Chlorhexidine on Infected Wound Healing. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Monteiro, D.R.; Silva, S.; Negri, M.; Gorup, L.F.; de Camargo, E.R.; Oliveira, R.; Barbosa, D.B.; Henriques, M. Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles in combination with nystatin and chlorhexidine digluconate against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms. Mycoses 2013, 56, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Charannya, S.; Duraivel, D.; Padminee, K.; Poorni, S.; Nishanthine, C.; Srinivasan, M. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of silver nanoparticles and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate when used alone and in combination assessed using agar diffusion method: An In vitro study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2018, 9, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Steckiewicz, K.P.; Cieciórski, P.; Barcińska, E.; Jaśkiewicz, M.; Narajczyk, M.; Bauer, M.; Kamysz, W.; Megiel, E.; Inkielewicz-Stepniak, I. Silver Nanoparticles as Chlorhexidine and Metronidazole Drug Delivery Platforms: Their Potential Use in Treating Periodontitis. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022, 17, 495–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gholami, A.; Ghezelbash, K.; Asheghi, B.; Abbaszadegan, A.; Amini, A. An In Vitro Study on the Antibacterial Effects of Chlorhexidine-Loaded Positively Charged Silver Nanoparticles on Enterococcus faecalis. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 6405772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ben-Knaz, R.; Pedahzur, R.; Avnir, D. Bioactive doped metals: High synergism in the bactericidal activity of chlorhexidine@silver towards wound pathogenic bacteria. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 8009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, M.; Ge, Y.; Qiu, J.; Shao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, J.; Zheng, X.; Chang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Dong, W.; et al. Redox/pH dual-controlled release of chlorhexidine and silver ions from biodegradable mesoporous silica nanoparticles against oral biofilms. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 7697–7709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmad, F.; Salem-Bekhit, M.M.; Khan, F.; Alshehri, S.; Khan, A.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Wu, H.-F.; Taha, E.I.; Elbagory, I. Unique Properties of Surface-Functionalized Nanoparticles for Bio-Application: Functionalization Mechanisms and Importance in Application. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ivanova, N.; Gugleva, V.; Dobreva, M.; Pehlivanov, I.; Stefanov, S.; Andonova, V. Silver Nanoparticles as Multi-Functional Drug Delivery Systems; Farrukh, M.A., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, X.-F.; Liu, Z.-G.; Shen, W.; Gurunathan, S. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, Properties, Applications, and Therapeutic Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, F.; Harper, B.J.; Harper, S.L. Differential dissolution and toxicity of surface functionalized silver nanoparticles in small-scale microcosms: Impacts of community complexity. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Noah, N. Green synthesis: Characterization and application of silver and gold nanoparticles. In Green Synthesis, Characterization and Applications of Nanoparticles; Shukla, A.K., Iravani, S., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 111–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ong, W.T.J.; Nyam, K.L. Evaluation of silver nanoparticles in cosmeceutical and potential biosafety complications. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 2085–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mallineni, S.K.; Sakhamuri, S.; Kotha, S.L.; AlAsmari, A.R.G.M.; AlJefri, G.H.; Almotawah, F.N.; Mallineni, S.; Sajja, R. Silver Nanoparticles in Dental Applications: A Descriptive Review. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Huang, C.; Cai, Y.; Chen, X.; Ke, Y. Silver-based nanocomposite for fabricating high performance value-added cotton. Cellulose 2021, 29, 723–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ahmad, S.A.; Das, S.S.; Khatoon, A.; Ansari, M.T.; Afzal, M.; Hasnain, M.S.; Nayak, A.K. Bactericidal activity of silver nanoparticles: A mechanistic review. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2020, 3, 756–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prabhu, S.; Poulose, E.K. Silver nanoparticles: Mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int. Nano Lett. 2012, 2, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bruna, T.; Maldonado-Bravo, F.; Jara, P.; Caro, N. Silver Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vishwanath, R.; Negi, B. Conventional and green methods of synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their antimicrobial properties. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guilger-Casagrande, M.; Lima, R.D. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Mediated by Fungi: A Review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Prasher, P.; Sharma, M. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Functionalization and Applications; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2022; pp. 65–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. John, V.; Weddell, J.A.; Shin, D.E.; Jones, J.E. Gingivitis and Periodontal Disease. In McDonald and Avery’s Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent; Dean, J.A., Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 243–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mueller, R.S. Topical dermatological therapy. In Small Animal Clinical Pharmacology; Maddison, J.E., Page, S.W., Church, D.B., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jou, S.K.; Malek, N.A.N.N. Characterization and antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine loaded silver-kaolinite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 127, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cole, M.; Hobden, J.; Warner, I. Recycling Antibiotics into GUMBOS: A New Combination Strategy to Combat Multi-Drug-Resistant Bacteria. Molecules 2015, 20, 6466–6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Riaz, M.; Mutreja, V.; Sareen, S.; Ahmad, B.; Faheem, M.; Zahid, N.; Jabbour, G.; Park, J. Exceptional antibacterial and cytotoxic potency of monodisperse greener AgNPs prepared under optimized pH and temperature. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Meesaragandla, B.; Hayet, S.; Fine, T.; Janke, U.; Chai, L.; Delcea, M. Inhibitory Effect of Epigallocatechin Gallate-Silver Nanoparticles and Their Lysozyme Bioconjugates on Biofilm Formation and Cytotoxicity. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022, 5, 4213–4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, X.; Luan, S.; Yin, Z.; He, M.; He, C.; Yin, L.; Zou, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Li, L.; Song, X.; et al. Recent advances in the medical use of silver complex. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 157, 62–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aziz, S.B.; Hussein, G.; Brza, M.A.; Mohammed, S.J.; Abdulwahid, R.T.; Raza Saeed, S.; Hassanzadeh, A. Fabrication of Interconnected Plasmonic Spherical Silver Nanoparticles with Enhanced Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) Peaks Using Quince Leaf Extract Solution. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nemčeková, K.; Svitková, V.; Sochr, J.; Gemeiner, P.; Labuda, J. Gallic acid-coated silver nanoparticles as perspective drug nanocarriers: Bioanalytical study. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 5493–5505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rezazadeh, N.H.; Buazar, F.; Matroodi, S. Synergistic effects of combinatorial chitosan and polyphenol biomolecules on enhanced antibacterial activity of biofunctionalized silver nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sabbagh, F.; Khatir, N.M.; Kiarostami, K. Synthesis and Characterization of 𝒌-Carrageenan/PVA Nanocomposite Hydrogels in Combination with MgZnO Nanoparticles to Evaluate the Catechin Release. Polymers 2023, 15, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ivanova, N.; Andonova, V.; Jelev, I.; Dimova, G. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles with green tea-extracted reductants: A preliminary study for optimization of the preparation technique. Scr. Sci. Pharm. 2021, 8, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  36. Krishnaswamy, N.R. Chemistry of Natural Products: A Laboratory Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  37. Faleiro, M.L.; Miguel, M.G. Use of Essential Oils and Their Components against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. In Fighting Multidrug Resistance with Herbal Extracts, Essential Oils and Their Components; Rai, M.K., Kon, K.V., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 65–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Repetto, G.; del Peso, A.; Zurita, J.L. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Robb, C.S.; Geldart, S.E.; Seelenbinder, J.A.; Brown, P.R. Analysis of Green Tea Constituents by HPLC-FTIR. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2002, 25, 787–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xia, J.; Wang, D.; Liang, P.; Zhang, D.; Du, X.; Ni, D.; Yu, Z. Vibrational (FT-IR, Raman) analysis of tea catechins based on both theoretical calculations and experiments. Biophys. Chem. 2020, 256, 106282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Theivasanthi, T.; Alagar, M. Electrolytic Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanopowder. Nano Biomed. Eng. 2012, 4, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Janardhanan, R.; Karuppaiah, M.; Hebalkar, N.; Rao, T.N. Synthesis and surface chemistry of nano silver particles. Polyhedron 2009, 28, 2522–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jemal, K.; Sandeep, B.V.; Pola, S. Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Allophylus serratus Leaf and Leaf Derived Callus Extracts Mediated Silver Nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2017, 2017, 4213275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mehta, B.K.; Chhajlani, M.; Shrivastava, B.D. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their characterization by XRD. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 836, 012050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Priyadarshini, B.; Selvan, S.; Narayanan, K.; Fawzy, A. Characterization of Chlorhexidine-Loaded Calcium-Hydroxide Microparticles as a Potential Dental Pulp-Capping Material. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Barot, T.; Rawtani, D.; Kulkarni, P. Development of Chlorhexidine Loaded Halloysite Nanotube Based Experimental Resin Composite with Enhanced Physico-Mechanical and Biological Properties for Dental Applications. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Raso, E.M.G.; Cortes, M.E.; Teixeira, K.I.; Franco, M.B.; Mohallem, N.D.S.; Sinisterra, R.D. A new controlled release system of chlorhexidine and chlorhexidine: βcd inclusion compounds based on porous silica. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2009, 67, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, X.-Y.; Wang, S.-Y.; Li, J.; Zheng, Y.-X.; Zhang, R.-J.; Zhou, P.; Yang, Y.-M.; Chen, L.-Y. Study of structure and optical properties of silver oxide films by ellipsometry, XRD and XPS methods. Thin Solid Films 2004, 455, 438–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jeung, D.-G.; Lee, M.; Paek, S.-M.; Oh, J.-M. Controlled Growth of Silver Oxide Nanoparticles on the Surface of Citrate Anion Intercalated Layered Double Hydroxide. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dhoondia, Z.H.; Chakraborty, H. Lactobacillus Mediated Synthesis of Silver Oxide Nanoparticles. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 2012, 2, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, J.; Lu, J.; Kan, J.; Wen, X.; Jin, C. Synthesis, characterization and in vitro anti-diabetic activity of catechin grafted inulin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 64, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Roell, K.R.; Reif, D.M.; Motsinger-Reif, A.A. An Introduction to Terminology and Methodology of Chemical Synergy—Perspectives from Across Disciplines. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yin, I.X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, I.S.; Mei, M.L.; Li, Q.; Chu, C.H. The Antibacterial Mechanism of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Application in Dentistry. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 2555–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dakal, T.C.; Kumar, A.; Majumdar, R.S.; Yadav, V. Mechanistic Basis of Antimicrobial Actions of Silver Nanoparticles. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Visual appearance of SN samples on day 2 after preparation (immediately after dialysis) and on day 7 after preparation.
Figure 1. Visual appearance of SN samples on day 2 after preparation (immediately after dialysis) and on day 7 after preparation.
Pharmaceutics 15 02298 g001
Figure 2. UV-Vis spectra, TEM micrographs, zeta potential distribution, and size analysis via MADLS of: (A) SN sample 2C8R4.5; (B) SN-Cx sample 2C8R4.5Cx+++.
Figure 2. UV-Vis spectra, TEM micrographs, zeta potential distribution, and size analysis via MADLS of: (A) SN sample 2C8R4.5; (B) SN-Cx sample 2C8R4.5Cx+++.
Pharmaceutics 15 02298 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of green tea phenolic extract (green line), SN (black line), Cx (blue line), and SN-Cx (red line) samples.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of green tea phenolic extract (green line), SN (black line), Cx (blue line), and SN-Cx (red line) samples.
Pharmaceutics 15 02298 g003
Figure 4. XRD of the SN sample 2C8R4.5 (black line), SN-Cx sample 2C8R4.5Cx+++ (red line), and chlorhexidine diacetate (blue line).
Figure 4. XRD of the SN sample 2C8R4.5 (black line), SN-Cx sample 2C8R4.5Cx+++ (red line), and chlorhexidine diacetate (blue line).
Pharmaceutics 15 02298 g004
Figure 5. Seeds of the Cx and SN-Cx diluted suspensions on blood agar.
Figure 5. Seeds of the Cx and SN-Cx diluted suspensions on blood agar.
Pharmaceutics 15 02298 g005
Table 1. Silver nanoparticle test formulations and UV-Vis spectral results.
Table 1. Silver nanoparticle test formulations and UV-Vis spectral results.
Formulation CodeSilver Nitrate Conc., mMReductant (C8) conc., mg/mL *Day 2Day 7
λmax, nmAbs ± SDλmax, nmAbs ± SD
1C8R0.610.64260.307 ± 0.0014300.481 ± 0.001
2C8R0.620.64250.435 ± 0.0024290.571 ± 0.001
1C8R111.04230.617 ± 0.0014290.744 ± 0.002
2C8R121.04250.776 ± 0.0024280.889 ± 0.002
1C8R1.511.54250.753 ± 0.0024290.913 ± 0.002
2C8R1.521.54250.948 ± 0.0014301.125 ± 0.003
1C8R3134171.350 ± 0.0034181.395 ± 0.005
2C8R3234211.828 ± 0.0034241.904 ± 0.002
1C8R4.514.54161.379 ± 0.0044151.367 ± 0.003
2C8R4.524.54212.374 ± 0.0034222.386 ± 0.002
1C8R6164131.448 ± 0.0044151.498 ± 0.002
2C8R6 **264172.584 ± 0.0044202.758 ± 0.003
* The reductant volume was kept constant at 0.5 mL. ** Turbidity was recorded and a slight sediment was formed after a few days of storage.
Table 2. Zeta potential of the SN and SN-Cx samples.
Table 2. Zeta potential of the SN and SN-Cx samples.
Formulation CodeCx 3.75 mg/mL vol. (mL)Cx Final Conc. in Solution, mg/mLZeta Potential, mV
2C8R1.5n/a *n/a−43.45
2C8R3n/an/a−39.06
2C8R4.5n/an/a−50.01
2C8R1.5 Cx+0.50.47 +31.24
2C8R1.5 Cx++1.00.83 +33.74
2C8R1.5 Cx+++1.51.13 +36.2
2C8R3 Cx+0.50.47 +40.02
2C8R3 Cx++1.00.83 +44.34
2C8R3 Cx+++1.51.13 +42.44
2C8R4.5 Cx+0.50.47 +41.22
2C8R4.5 Cx++1.00.83 +43.78
2C8R4.5 Cx+++1.51.13+44.59
* n/a—not applicable.
Table 3. MICs and MBC/MFCs of SN, Cx, and SN-Cx, along with the FICs of SN and Cx.
Table 3. MICs and MBC/MFCs of SN, Cx, and SN-Cx, along with the FICs of SN and Cx.
Infectious StrainMICMBC/MFCFICSNFICCx
SN (µg/mL)Cx (µg/mL)SN + Cx (µg/mL)SN (µg/mL)Cx (µg/mL)SN + Cx (µg/mL)
E. coli17535.3SN 5.5 + Cx 8.8175141.3SN 5.5 + Cx 8.80.0310.023
S. aureusn.e.*17.7SN 5.5 + Cx 8.8n.e.35.3SN 10.9 + Cx 17.7<<0.016 **0.497
C. albicansn.e.*17.7SN 5.5 + Cx 8.8n.e.n.e.SN 10.9 + Cx 17.7<<0.0160.497
* n.e.—not established. ** MICs of SN against S. aureus and C. albicans were not recorded in the investigated concentration range; thus, when this MIC value was needed for the FIC formula, it was considered to be higher than the maximal applied concentration, i.e., >350 µg/mL.
Table 4. Cytotoxicity in MDCK, A549, and BJ cells and antiviral activity in an experimental infection with 100 CCID50/mL of Influenza virus A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) from the MDCK line.
Table 4. Cytotoxicity in MDCK, A549, and BJ cells and antiviral activity in an experimental infection with 100 CCID50/mL of Influenza virus A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) from the MDCK line.
Active AgentCell LineCytotoxicity Antiviral Effect
CC50 (μg/mL) ± SDIC50 (μg/mL)SI
SNMDCK56.4 ± 0.443.6 ± 16.61.29
CxMDCK2.5 ± 0.7--
SN-CxMDCK1.6/2.6 ± 0.1--
SNA54960.7 ± 0.3n.d.n.d.
CxA5495.3 ± 0.7n.d.n.d.
SN-CxA5493.6/5.8 ± 0.2n.d.n.d.
SNBJ 16.9 ± 0.4n.d.n.d.
CxBJ2.2 ± 0.1n.d.n.d.
SN-CxBJ1.5/2.4 ± 0.5n.d.n.d.
SD—standard deviation. n.d.—not determined.
Table 5. Virucidal activity at the maximal tolerated concentrations (MTC) of SN, Cx, and SN-Cx against 100 CCID50/mL of Influenza virus A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) and titration from the contact sample in MDCK cells.
Table 5. Virucidal activity at the maximal tolerated concentrations (MTC) of SN, Cx, and SN-Cx against 100 CCID50/mL of Influenza virus A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) and titration from the contact sample in MDCK cells.
Active AgentΔlg
5 min15 min30 min60 min
SN 35 μg/mL2.52.663.003.00
Cx 2.0 μg/mL0000
SN-Cx 1.2/2.0 μg/mL000.330.33
Table 6. Virucidal activity of SN 350 μg/mL, Cx 113 μg/mL, and SN-Cx 70.0/113.0 μg/mL against 100 CCID50/mL of Influenza virus A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2) and titration from a 10-fold dilution of the contact sample in MDCK cells.
Table 6. Virucidal activity of SN 350 μg/mL, Cx 113 μg/mL, and SN-Cx 70.0/113.0 μg/mL against 100 CCID50/mL of Influenza virus A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2) and titration from a 10-fold dilution of the contact sample in MDCK cells.
Active AgentΔlg
5 min15 min30 min60 min
SN 350 μg/mL22.332.53
Cx 113 μg/mL11.331.661.66
SN-Cx 70.0/113.0 μg/mL11.331.662
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ivanova, N.; Ermenlieva, N.; Simeonova, L.; Kolev, I.; Slavov, I.; Karashanova, D.; Andonova, V. Chlorhexidine–Silver Nanoparticle Conjugation Leading to Antimicrobial Synergism but Enhanced Cytotoxicity. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092298

AMA Style

Ivanova N, Ermenlieva N, Simeonova L, Kolev I, Slavov I, Karashanova D, Andonova V. Chlorhexidine–Silver Nanoparticle Conjugation Leading to Antimicrobial Synergism but Enhanced Cytotoxicity. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(9):2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ivanova, Nadezhda, Neli Ermenlieva, Lora Simeonova, Iliyan Kolev, Iliya Slavov, Daniela Karashanova, and Velichka Andonova. 2023. "Chlorhexidine–Silver Nanoparticle Conjugation Leading to Antimicrobial Synergism but Enhanced Cytotoxicity" Pharmaceutics 15, no. 9: 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092298

APA Style

Ivanova, N., Ermenlieva, N., Simeonova, L., Kolev, I., Slavov, I., Karashanova, D., & Andonova, V. (2023). Chlorhexidine–Silver Nanoparticle Conjugation Leading to Antimicrobial Synergism but Enhanced Cytotoxicity. Pharmaceutics, 15(9), 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092298

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop