Unintended Circularity?—Assessing a Product-Service System for its Potential Contribution to a Circular Economy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Central Definitions
2. Research Method
2.1. Research Approach
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Identifying an Assessment Framework and Establishing Assessment Criteria through Circular Supporting Activities
2.4. The Kamiono Study
2.5. Research Methods Employed for Empirical Data Gathering and Compilation
2.5.1. Actor Maps
2.5.2. Interviews
2.5.3. Focus Groups
2.5.4. Data Compilation and Analysis
3. PSSs towards a CE—Status Quo, Assessment Framework, and Circular Supporting Activities
3.1. PSSs and a CE—A Brief Overview
3.2. Framework and Circular Supporting Activities to Assess the Potential CE Contribution of PSSs
- Operational Efficiency, which is described as being particularly relevant for PSSs with resource-intensive use phases. As the provider remains in the ownership of the physical components, this can give control over the maintenance and efficient operation.
- Product Component Longevity in case of use-oriented PSSs is, according to Kjaer et al. [17], focused on intensified maintenance in the use phase and possible direct reuse of product components (e.g., through re-leasing). Beyond that, PSS design for longevity and robustness can be considered a critical aspect [34].
- Value Creation System Substitution has profound implications in the case of PSSs, while it is also severely limited in use-oriented cases: Although customer value is often created differently, and possibly with higher efficiency than in the case of product sales, the provider has no control over which overall solution is chosen by a customer.
3.2.1. Circular Supporting Activities to Assess Relative Resource Decoupling towards a CE
- 0—Not applicable/no contribution to relative resource reduction.
- 1—Low contribution to relative resource reduction.
- 2—Notable contribution to relative resource reduction.
- 5—Substantial contribution to relative resource reduction.
4. Assessing Kamiono’s PSS for its Potential Contribution to a CE
4.1. The Potential Relative Resource Reduction through a Use-Oriented PSS towards a CE
4.1.1. Resource Reduction Enabler Operational Efficiency
Implement Performance Monitoring and Data-Driven Maintenance
Supports Efficiency of Customers’ Use
Adjust Incentives with a Lifecycle Focus
4.1.2. Resource Reduction Enabler Product Component Longevity
Implement EoL Management—Reuse, Remanufacturing, Recycling
Adjust Design Process for PSS Design
4.1.3. Resource Reduction Enabler Intensified Product Component Usage
4.1.4. Resource Reduction Enabler Value Creation System Substitution
Execute Customer Value-Oriented Substitution
4.2. Assessing Kamiono’s PSS with a Focus on Absolute Decoupling
4.2.1. Ensure Net Resource Reduction
Operational Efficiency
Product Component Longevity
Intensified Product Component Usage
4.2.2. Avoid Burden Shifting between Lifecycle Phases
4.2.3. Mitigate Rebound Effects
5. Discussion and Ways Forward
5.1. Lessons Learned for PSSs’ Potential Contribution to a CE in Terms of Relative and Absolute Resource Decoupling
5.1.1. Identified Challenges and Opportunities at Kamiono towards Resource Decoupling
Collecting, Handling and Utilizing Data
Adjusting Incentives and Mindset
5.1.2. Circularity Advancements at Kamiono and Potential Implications
5.2. Broadly Relevant Lessons Learned as a Result of the Study Conducted
5.3. Limitations of the Study
6. Conclusions and Outlook
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Goedkoop, M.J.; Van Halen, C.J.G.; Te Riele, H.R.M.; Rommens, P.J.M. Product Service systems, Ecological and Economic Basics; Research Report 1999/36 Submitted to Ministerje van Volkshuisvesting; Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Bocken, N.M.P.; Short, S.W.; Rana, P.; Evans, S. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, M.; Evans, S. Product-service system business model archetypes and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 1156–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mont, O. Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J. Clean. Prod. 2002, 10, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EMF. Towards a Circular Economy: Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Circle Economy. The Circularity Gap Report 2019; Circle Economy: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Lewandowski, M. Designing the business models for circular economy-towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability 2016, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reike, D.; Vermeulen, W.J.V.; Witjes, S. The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0?—Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 246–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korhonen, J.; Nuur, C.; Feldmann, A.; Birkie, S.E. Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Den Hollander, M.C.; Bakker, C.A.; Hultink, E.J. Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charter, M. (Ed.) Designing for the Circular Economy; Routledge: Abingdon, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2018; ISBN 9781315113067. [Google Scholar]
- Bocken, N.M.P.; de Pauw, I.; Bakker, C.; van der Grinten, B. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2016, 33, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moreno, M.; De los Rios, C.; Rowe, Z.; Charnley, F. A conceptual framework for circular design. Sustainability 2016, 8, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manninen, K.; Koskela, S.; Antikainen, R.; Bocken, N.; Dahlbo, H.; Aminoff, A. Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions? J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAloone, T.C.; Pigosso, D.C.A. Designing Product Service Systems for a Circular Economy. In Designing for the Circular Economy; Charter, M., Ed.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2018; pp. 102–112. [Google Scholar]
- Kjaer, L.L.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; Niero, M.; Bech, N.M.; McAloone, T.C. Product/Service-Systems for a Circular Economy: The Route to Decoupling Economic Growth from Resource Consumption? J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spring, M.; Araujo, L. Product biographies in servitization and the circular economy. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2017, 60, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lieder, M.; Rashid, A. Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 115, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalmykova, Y.; Sadagopan, M.; Rosado, L. Circular economy—From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizos, V.; Behrens, A.; van der Gaast, W.; Hofman, E.; Ioannou, A.; Kafyeke, T.; Flamos, A.; Rinaldi, R.; Papadelis, S.; Hirschnitz-Garbers, M.; et al. Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, A.; Skene, K.; Haynes, K. The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 140, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witjes, S.; Lozano, R. Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 112, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nußholz, J.L.K. Circular business models: Defining a concept and framing an emerging research field. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parida, V.; Wincent, J. Why and how to compete through sustainability: A review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2019, 15, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reim, W.; Parida, V.; Örtqvist, D. Product–Service Systems (PSS) business models and tactics—A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 97, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tukker, A. Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2004, 13, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, A.; Brady, T.; Hobday, M. Charting a path toward integrated solutions. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2006, 43, 39–48. [Google Scholar]
- Kjaer, L.L.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; McAloone, T.C.; Birkved, M. Guidelines for evaluating the environmental performance of Product/Service-Systems through life cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 190, 666–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vezzoli, C.; Ceschin, F.; Diehl, J.C.; Kohtala, C. New Design Challenges to Widely Implement ‘Sustainable Product-Service Systems’. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 97, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iung, B.; Levrat, E. Advanced maintenance services for promoting sustainability. Procedia CIRP 2014, 22, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niero, M.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Hoffmeyer, S.B.; Olsen, S.I. Combining Eco-Efficiency and Eco-Effectiveness for Continuous Loop Beverage Packaging Systems: Lessons from the Carlsberg Circular Community. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abukhader, S.M. Eco-efficiency in the era of electronic commerce - should “Eco-Effectiveness” approach be adopted? J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matschewsky, J.; Kambanou, M.L.; Sakao, T. Designing and providing integrated product-service systems-challenges, opportunities and solutions resulting from prescriptive approaches in two industrial companies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2150–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, V.; Bastl, M.; Kingston, J.; Evans, S. Challenges in transforming manufacturing organisations into product-service providers. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2010, 21, 449–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heyes, G.; Sharmina, M.; Mendoza, J.M.F.; Gallego-Schmid, A.; Azapagic, A. Developing and implementing circular economy business models in service-oriented technology companies. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 177, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF). Growth Within: A Circular Economy Vision for a Competitive Europe; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Vandermerwe, S.; Rada, J. Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. Eur. Manag. J. 1988, 6, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baines, T.S.; Lightfoot, H.; Peppard, J.; Johnson, M.; Tiwari, A.; Shehab, E.; Swink, M. Towards an operations strategy for product-centric servitization. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2009, 29, 494–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer-Kowalski, M.; Swilling, M.; von Weizsäcker, E.U.; Ren, Y.; Moriguchi, Y.; Crane, W.; Krausmann, F.; Eisenmenger, N.; Giljum, S.; Hennicke, P.; et al. Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Onwuegbuzie, A.J.; Frels, R. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal Cultural Approach; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016; ISBN 9781446248928. [Google Scholar]
- Tunn, V.S.C.; Bocken, N.M.P.; van den Hende, E.A.; Schoormans, J.P.L. Business models for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: An expert study. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 212, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindahl, M.; Sakao, T.; Carlsson, E. Actors and System Maps for Integrated Product Service Offerings – Practical Experience from Two Companies. Procedia CIRP 2014, 16, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desai, A.; Lindahl, M.; Widgren, M. Actors and System Maps—A Methodology for Developing Product/Service Systems. In Sustainability through Innovation in Product Life Cycle Design; Matsumoto, M., Masui, K., Fukushige, S., Kondo, S., Eds.; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2017; pp. 217–232. [Google Scholar]
- Flick, U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research; SAGE Publications: London, UK, 2009; ISBN 1446297713. [Google Scholar]
- Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods; SAGE Publications: London, UK, 2002; ISBN 1483314812. [Google Scholar]
- Krueger, R.A.; Casey, M.A. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 5th ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014; ISBN 1483365220. [Google Scholar]
- Corbin, J.; Strauss, A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008; Volume 3, ISBN 9781412906449. [Google Scholar]
- Glaser, B.G.; Strauss, A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research; Aldine Transaction: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 1967; ISBN 0202302601. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013; ISBN 1483302008. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC. Global Warming of 1.5 °C; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Merli, R.; Preziosi, M.; Acampora, A. How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 178, 703–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahti, T.; Wincent, J.; Parida, V. A definition and theoretical review of the circular economy, value creation, and sustainable business models: Where are we now and where should research move in the future? Sustainability 2018, 10, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.; Kalverkamp, M.; Wuest, T. Cascade Utilization During the End-of-Life of Product Service Systems: Synergies and Challenges. In Cascade Use in Technologies 2018; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Vezzoli, C.; Ceschin, F.; Diehl, J.C.; Kohtala, C. Why have “Sustainable Product-Service Systems” not been widely implemented? Meeting new design challenges to achieve societal sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 35, 288–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parida, V.; Burström, T.; Visnjic, I.; Wincent, J. Orchestrating industrial ecosystem in circular economy: A two-stage transformation model for large manufacturing companies. J. Bus. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michelini, G.; Moraes, R.N.; Cunha, R.N.; Costa, J.M.H.; Ometto, A.R. From Linear to Circular Economy: PSS Conducting the Transition. Procedia CIRP 2017, 64, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritzén, S.; Ölundh Sandström, G. Barriers to the Circular Economy—Integration of Perspectives and Domains. Procedia CIRP 2017, 64, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzini, E.; Vezzoli, C.; Clark, G. Product-Service Systems: Using an Existing Concept as a New Approach to Sustainability. J. Des. Res. 2001, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baines, T.S.; Lightfoot, H.W.; Evans, S.; Neely, A.; Greenough, R.; Peppard, J.; Roy, R.; Shehab, E.; Braganza, A.; Tiwari, A.; et al. State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2007, 221, 1543–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bocken, N.M.P.; Olivetti, E.A.; Cullen, J.M.; Potting, J.; Lifset, R. Taking the Circularity to the Next Level: A Special Issue on the Circular Economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagoropoulos, A.; Kjaer, L.L.; Dong, Y.; Birkved, M.; McAloone, T.C. Economic and Environmental Impact Trade-Offs Related to In-Water Hull Cleanings of Merchant Vessels. J. Ind. Ecol. 2018, 22, 916–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartolomeo, M.; dal Maso, D.; de Jong, P.; Eder, P.; Groenewegen, P.; Hopkinson, P.; James, P.; Nijhuis, L.; Örninge, M.; Scholl, G.; et al. Eco-efficient producer services—What are they, how do they benefit customers and the environment and how likely are they to develop and be extensively utilised? J. Clean. Prod. 2003, 11, 829–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzini, E.; Vezzoli, C. Product-Service Systems and Sustainability: Opportunities for Sustainable Solutions; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2002; ISBN 92-807-2206-9. [Google Scholar]
- Lindahl, M.; Sundin, E.; Sakao, T. Environmental and economic benefits of Integrated Product Service Offerings quantified with real business cases. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 64, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Firnkorn, J.; Müller, M. What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amaya, J.; Lelah, A.; Zwolinski, P. Design for intensified use in product–service systems using life-cycle analysis. J. Eng. Des. 2014, 25, 280–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mont, O. Reducing Life-Cycle Environmental Impacts through Systems of Joint Use. Greener Manag. Int. 2004, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerr, W.; Ryan, C. Eco-efficiency gains from remanufacturing: A case study of photocopier remanufacturing at Fuji Xerox Australia. J. Clean. Prod. 2001, 9, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grubic, T.; Jennions, I. Do outcome-based contracts exist? The investigation of power-by-the-hour and similar result-oriented cases. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 206, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franceschini, F.; Rupil, A. Rating scales and prioritization in QFD. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 1999, 16, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bressanelli, G.; Adrodegari, F.; Perona, M.; Saccani, N. The role of digital technologies to overcome Circular Economy challenges in PSS Business Models: An exploratory case study. Procedia CIRP 2018, 73, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fargnoli, M.; Costantino, F.; Di Gravio, G.; Tronci, M. Product service-systems implementation: A customized framework to enhance sustainability and customer satisfaction. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 188, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendoza, J.M.F.; Sharmina, M.; Gallego-Schmid, A.; Heyes, G.; Azapagic, A. Integrating Backcasting and Eco-Design for the Circular Economy: The BECE Framework. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 526–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Buren, N.; Demmers, M.; van der Heijden, R.; Witlox, F.; van Buren, N.; Demmers, M.; van der Heijden, R.; Witlox, F. Towards a Circular Economy: The Role of Dutch Logistics Industries and Governments. Sustainability 2016, 8, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundin, E.; Lindahl, M.; Ijomah, W. Product design for product/service systems. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2009, 20, 723–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Isaksson, O.; Larsson, T.C.; Rönnbäck, A.O. Development of product-service systems: Challenges and opportunities for the manufacturing firm. J. Eng. Des. 2009, 20, 329–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reim, W.; Sjödin, D.; Parida, V. Mitigating adverse customer behaviour for product-service system provision: An agency theory perspective. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2018, 74, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, A.; Asif, F.M.A.; Krajnik, P.; Nicolescu, C.M. Resource Conservative Manufacturing: An essential change in business and technology paradigm for sustainable manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 57, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prendeville, S.; Bocken, N. Design for Remanufacturing and Circular Business Models. In Sustainability through Innovation in Product Life Cycle Design Part of the Series EcoProduction; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 269–283. ISBN 978-981-10-0469-8. [Google Scholar]
- Saidani, M.; Yannou, B.; Leroy, Y.; Cluzel, F. How to Assess Product Performance in the Circular Economy? Proposed Requirements for the Design of a Circularity Measurement Framework. Recycling 2017, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vezzoli, C.; Kohtala, C.; Srinivasan, A.; Xin, L.; Fusakul, M.; Sateesh, D.; Diehl, J.C. Product-Service System Design for Sustainability; Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield, UK, 2014; ISBN 1783530790. [Google Scholar]
- Manzini, E.; Vezzoli, C. A strategic design approach to develop sustainable product service systems: Examples taken from the ‘environmentally friendly innovation’ Italian prize. J. Clean. Prod. 2003, 11, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbinati, A.; Chiaroni, D.; Chiesa, V. Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kane, G.M.; Bakker, C.A.; Balkenende, A.R. Towards design strategies for circular medical products. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gutowski, T.G.; Sahni, S.; Boustani, A.; Graves, S.C. Remanufacturing and Energy Savings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 4540–4547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Binswanger, M. Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect? Ecol. Econ. 2001, 36, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceschin, F.; Gaziulusoy, I. Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Des. Stud. 2016, 47, 118–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scheepens, A.E.; Vogtländer, J.G.; Brezet, J.C. Two life cycle assessment (LCA) based methods to analyse and design complex (regional) circular economy systems. Case: Making water tourism more sustainable. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagoropoulos, A.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; McAloone, T.C. The Emergent Role of Digital Technologies in the Circular Economy: A Review. Procedia CIRP 2017, 64, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kowalkowski, C.; Windahl, C.; Kindström, D.; Gebauer, H. What service transition? Rethinking established assumptions about manufacturers’ service-led growth strategies. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2015, 45, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenka, S.; Parida, V.; Sjödin, D.R.; Wincent, J. Towards a multi-level servitization framework: Conceptualizing ambivalence in manufacturing firms. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2018, 38, 810–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenka, S.; Parida, V.; Sjödin, D.R.; Wincent, J. Exploring the microfoundations of servitization: How individual actions overcome organizational resistance. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 88, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barquet, A.P.B.; de Oliveira, M.G.; Amigo, C.R.; Cunha, V.P.; Rozenfeld, H. Employing the business model concept to support the adoption of product–service systems (PSS). Ind. Mark. Manag. 2013, 42, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thenent, N.E.; Settanni, E.; Sandborn, P.; Newnes, L.B. Maintenance within Product Service Systems: Is technical knowledge enough to link performance and cost? In Proceedings of the Maintenance Performance Measurement and Management Conference, Lappeenranta, Finland, 12–13 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Matschewsky, J.; Sakao, T.; Khanagha, S.; Elfving, S.W. What’s in it for the Provider? The Case of a Telecom Vendor’s Value Capturing from the Transition to Product-Service Systems. Procedia CIRP 2016, 47, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundin, E.; Östlin, J.; Öhrwall Rönnbäck, A.; Lindahl, M.; Sandström, G. Remanufacturing of Products used in Product Service System Offerings. In Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier SE-110; Mitsuishi, M., Ueda, K., Kimura, F., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2008; pp. 537–542. ISBN 978-1-84800-266-1. [Google Scholar]
- Sakao, T.; Mizuyama, H. Understanding of a product/service system design: A holistic approach to support design for remanufacturing. J. Remanuf. 2014, 4, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundin, E.; Bras, B. Making functional sales environmentally and economically beneficial through product remanufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 913–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Drabe, V.; Hübner, R.; Herstatt, C. Analyzing Barriers to Corporate Implementation of the Circular Economy Concept—An Exploratory Approach. In Proceedings of the Social and Sustainable Innovation; Wulfsberg, J., Redlich, T., Moritz, M., Eds.; Helmut-Schmidt-University: Hamburg, Germany, 2016; pp. 53–63. [Google Scholar]
- De Jesus, A.; Mendonça, S. Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 145, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zink, T.; Geyer, R. Circular Economy Rebound. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Council; European Parliament. Directive 2009/125/EC Establishing a Framework for the Setting of Ecodesign Requirements for Energy-Related Products; Official Journal of the European Union: Strasbourg, France, 2009; pp. 285/10–285/35. [Google Scholar]
- Kanda, W.; Matschewsky, J. An exploratory expansion of the concept of product-service systems beyond products and services. Procedia CIRP 2018, 73, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annarelli, A.; Battistella, C.; Nonino, F. Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 1011–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brambila-Macias, S.A.; Sakao, T.; Kowalkowski, C. Bridging the gap between engineering design and marketing: Insights for research and practice in product/service system design. Des. Sci. 2018, 4, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grönroos, C.; Voima, P. Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2013, 41, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Vladimirova, D.; Evans, S. Sustainable business model innovation: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Research Method/Data-Gathering Approach | Timeframe | Respondents | Total Number of Sessions |
---|---|---|---|
Actor Maps | 2014–2015 | Product designer, Head of department product design, Project coordinator, Early-stage design engineer, Environmental coordinator | 5 |
Interviews | 2014–2017 | Product Development (e.g., R and D Leader; Project leader; Project Manager; Design Manager; Design Group Leader; Quality Engineer), Service (e.g., Business Development Manager; Service Leader; Service Coordinator), PSS Management (e.g., Project Leader Product Data; Project Buyer; Senior Manager), Product Management (Product Group Manager; Product Manager), Sales (e.g., Salesman; Key Account Manager) | 19 |
Focus groups | 2016–2018 | All of the above. | 4 |
Activity to Support PSSs’ Potential Relative Resource Reduction towards a CE | Description of Activity if Fully Applied | References | Supported PSSs Strategies | Relevant Lifecycle Phases | Resource Reduction Aim |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Implement Performance Monitoring and Data-Driven Maintenance | PSS provider performs maintenance with a focus on efficiency, ideally predictive, data-driven maintenance. | [31,36,73,74] | Operational Support; Product Component Maintenance | Use | Reduced resource use in the use phase |
Support Efficiency of Customers’ Use | PSS provider supports the customer in using the offering with utmost efficiency. This is a critical aspect for providers of use-oriented PSSs, as these are customer-operated and crucial to ensuring highly efficient operation and low resource use in the use phase. | [66,75,76,77,78,79] | Operational Support | Use | Reduced resource use in the use phase |
Adjust Incentives with Lifecycle Focus | PSS-oriented internal incentives are guiding the provider’s activities throughout all lifecycle phases. This concerns, for example, typically conflicting issues such as simultaneous efforts to reduce production cost and use phase costs, product-centric sales incentives and incentives to “sell” services while internal company divisions are billed in cases of use-oriented PSSs. | [18,26,27,28,80] | Operational Support; Product Component Maintenance; Product Component Take-Back/EoL Management; Product Component Sharing, Optimized Result | Design, Use, EoL | Reduced resource use in the use phase |
Implement EoL Management - Reuse, Remanufacturing, Recycling | The PSS provider ensures reuse, remanufacturing or recycling (in order of CE contribution) and thus, the use of the physical components of the PSS in further lifecycles. | [8,55,81] | Product Component Take-Back/EoL Management | Design, EoL | Reduced need to produce product components, reduced resource use in the use phase |
Adjust Design Process for PSS Design | Specific, PSS-focused design process, ensuring resource efficiency (decreasing resource use per customer value created) and effectiveness (intentional, purposeful design for slowing and closing loops, including 4R efforts (Reduce, Reuse, Recycling, Remanufacturing)). | [11,30,66,68,82,83] | Product Component Maintenance, Product Sharing, Take-Back/EoL | Design, Use, EoL | Reduced need to produce product components, reduced resource use in the use phase |
Enable Shared PSS Use | The physical components of a PSS are relocated and distributed by the provider based on the current customer needs, increasing resource utilization. | [14,15,18,84,85,86] | Product Component Sharing | Use | Reduced need to produce product components, reduced resource use in the use phase |
Execute Customer-Value Oriented Substitution | The value creation system of the PSSs is substituted by a replacement with reduced resource use, with the result creating the same customer value. | [17,27] | Displace more resource intensive systems | Use | Displace more resource-intensive systems |
Resource Reduction Enabler | Activity to Support PSSs’ Potential Relative Resource Reduction towards a CE | Kamiono’s Strategy, Structure, and Processes towards Designing and Providing PSSs | PSSs’ Potential Contribution to Relative Resource Reduction towards a CE |
---|---|---|---|
Operational Efficiency | Implement Performance Monitoring and Data-Driven Maintenance |
| (1) Low contribution. |
Support Efficiency of Customers’ Use |
| (5) Substantial potential contribution resulting from Kamiono’s continued ownership and control of physical components. | |
Adjust Incentives with Lifecycle Focus |
| (1) Incentives remain product focused; thus no notable contribution can be expected. | |
Product Component Longevity | Implement EoL Management - Reuse, Remanufacturing, Recycling |
| (5) Substantial contribution possible, as Kamiono has no access to cores in traditional product sales. |
Adjust Design Process for PSS Design |
| (0) As product components are identical in sales and PSSs, no contribution can be expected. | |
Intensified Product Component Usage | Enable Shared PSS Use |
| (2) Short-term PSS may contribute; in connection with PSS depends on customer’s planning. |
Value Creation System Substitution | Execute Customer-Value Oriented Substitution |
| (0) Not applicable at this time. |
© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Matschewsky, J. Unintended Circularity?—Assessing a Product-Service System for its Potential Contribution to a Circular Economy. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102725
Matschewsky J. Unintended Circularity?—Assessing a Product-Service System for its Potential Contribution to a Circular Economy. Sustainability. 2019; 11(10):2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102725
Chicago/Turabian StyleMatschewsky, Johannes. 2019. "Unintended Circularity?—Assessing a Product-Service System for its Potential Contribution to a Circular Economy" Sustainability 11, no. 10: 2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102725
APA StyleMatschewsky, J. (2019). Unintended Circularity?—Assessing a Product-Service System for its Potential Contribution to a Circular Economy. Sustainability, 11(10), 2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102725