Smart Digital Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Property Development: A Case of Malaysia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Smart and Sustainable Digital Marketing
2.2. Technologies Used for Smart Digital Marketing
2.3. Global Digital Marketing for Smart and Sustainable Property Development and Management
2.4. Digital Marketing Applied by Property Development Companies in Malaysia
3. Developing the Conceptual Model and Hypotheses
3.1. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Proposed Smart Digital Marketing Technology Acceptance Model (MTAM)
3.2. Smart Digital Marketing Models
4. Research Method
4.1. Research Design
4.2. Data Collection and Sampling Method
4.3. Data Analyses
5. Results and Discussions
5.1. Demographics of the Respondents
5.2. Statistical Analyses for Hypotheses and Results
5.3. Opinions on the Real Estate Agency Websites Used by Malaysian Property Development Companies
5.4. Opinions on Competencies, Skills, and Gaps in Smart and Sustainable Digital Marketing
5.5. Strategies to Improve Smart Digital Marketing on an Organizational Level in Malaysian Property Development Sector
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
Implications, Limitations and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chaffey, D.; Ellis-Chadwick, F. Digital Marketing; Pearson: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Khin, A.A.; Chau, W.H.; Chuan, C.S.; Tong, L.K. Factors Affecting for Online Marketing Strategy of Business Development in Malaysia. J. Econ. Manag. Trade 2016, 11, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Floreddu, P.B.; Cabiddu, F.; Evaristo, R. Inside your social media ring: How to optimize online corporate reputation. Bus. Horiz. 2014, 57, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabiddu, F.; De Carlo, M.; Piccoli, G. Social media affordances: Enabling customer engagement. Ann. Tour. Res. 2014, 48, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Tan, W.; Sepasgozar, S.M. Digital Twin and CyberGIS for Improving Connectivity and Measuring the Impact of Infrastructure Construction Planning in Smart Cities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Lim, S.; Trinder, J.; Li, H.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E. Data mining for recognition of spatial distribution patterns of building heights using airborne lidar data. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2020, 43, 101033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Trinder, J.; Osmond, P. New Metrics for Spatial and Temporal 3D Urban Form Sustainability Assessment Using Time Series Lidar Point Clouds and Advanced GIS Techniques. In Urban Design; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Sepasgozar, S.M.; Li, H.; Trinder, J.; Tang, P. Comparative analysis of machine learning and point-based algorithms for detecting 3D changes in buildings over time using bi-temporal lidar data. Autom. Constr. 2019, 105, 102841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Sepasgozar, S.M. Spatial analysis using temporal point clouds in advanced GIS: Methods for ground elevation extraction in slant areas and building classifications. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E.; Li, H.; Trinder, J. Spatial compactness metrics and Constrained Voxel Automata development for analyzing 3D densification and applying to point clouds: A synthetic review. Autom. Constr. 2018, 96, 236–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, F.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E. Key Factors Influencing Purchase or Rent Decisions in Smart Real Estate Investments: A System Dynamics Approach using Online Forum Thread Data. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumpe, M. Online Marketing Issues of Real Estate Companies: A Case of Latvia. Balt. J. Real Estate Econ. Constr. Manag. 2015, 3, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- States, I.W. Internet Users Distribution in the World- Mid-Year. 2019. Available online: https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm (accessed on 9 December 2019).
- Masis, N.N.S.; Maimun, N.H.A.; Noor, N.A.M.; Yusoff, N.S.M.; Rahman, M.S.A. E-commerce in the Malaysian real estate agency industry. Int. J. Real Estate Stud. 2017, 11, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Egol, M.; Peterson, M.; Stroh, S. How to Choose the Right Digital Marketing Model; Strategy+Business: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Felli, F.; Liu, C.; Ullah, F.; Sepasgozar, S. Implementation of 360 videos and mobile laser measurement technologies for immersive visualisation of real estate & properties. In Proceedings of the 42nd AUBEA Conference, Singapore, 1 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ullah, F.; Shinetogtokh, T.; Samad Sepasgozar, P.; Ali, T.H. Investigation of the users’ interaction with online real estate platforms in Australia. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Development in Civil Engineering (ICSDC 2019), Jamshoro, Pakistan, 5–7 December 2019; p. 81. [Google Scholar]
- Sepasgozar, S.M.; Li, H.; Shirowzhan, S.; Tam, V.W. Methods for monitoring construction off-road vehicle emissions: A critical review for identifying deficiencies and directions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 15779–15794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Najib Razali, M.; Abdul Rahman, R.; Mohd Adnan, Y.; Yassin, A.M. The impact of information and communication technology on retail property in Malaysia. Prop. Manag. 2014, 32, 193–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, F.; Sepasgozar, S.M. A Study of Information Technology Adoption for Real-Estate Management: A System Dynamic Model. In Innovative Production and Construction; World Scientific: Singapore, 2019; pp. 469–486. [Google Scholar]
- Ullah, F.; Sepasgozar, S.M.; Wang, C. A systematic review of smart real estate technology: Drivers of, and barriers to, the use of digital disruptive technologies and online platforms. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ullah, F.; Samad Sepasgozar, P.; Ali, T.H. Real Estate Stakeholders Technology Acceptance Model (RESTAM): User-focused Big9 Disruptive Technologies for Smart Real Estate Management. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Development in Civil Engineering (ICSDC 2019), Jamshoro, Pakistan, 5–7 December 2019; p. 82. [Google Scholar]
- Munawar, H.S.; Qayyum, S.; Ullah, F.; Sepasgozar, S. Big Data and Its Applications in Smart Real Estate and the Disaster Management Life Cycle: A Systematic Analysis. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2020, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ullah, F.; Sepasgozar Samad, M.; Siddiqui, S. An investigation of real estate technology utilization in technologically advanced marketplace. In Proceedings of the 9th International Civil Engineering Congress (ICEC-2017), Striving Towards Resilient Built Environment, Karachi, Pakistan, 22–23 December 2017; pp. 22–23. [Google Scholar]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E.; Edwards, D.J.; Li, H.; Wang, C. BIM compatibility and its differentiation with interoperability challenges as an innovation factor. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linkov, I.; Trump, B.D.; Poinsatte-Jones, K.; Florin, M.-V. Governance strategies for a sustainable digital world. Sustainability 2018, 10, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Najib Razali, M.; Manaf, Z.; Mohd Yassin, A. Internet business strategies by property companies in Asia. Prop. Manag. 2010, 28, 270–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreca, A.; Curto, R.; Rolando, D. Housing vulnerability and property prices: Spatial analyses in the Turin real estate market. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, X.; Hui, E.; Sun, J. Population Aging, Mobility, and Real Estate Price: Evidence from Cities in China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alias, A. Internet marketing of residential properties: Investigation on effectiveness of its application. J. Surv. Constr. Prop. 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, K.; Hu, W.; Wei, J. The impact of population migration on urban housing prices: Evidence from China’s major cities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shahid, S.; Pour, S.H.; Wang, X.; Shourav, S.A.; Minhans, A.; bin Ismail, T. Impacts and adaptation to climate change in Malaysian real estate. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rachmawati, D.; Shukri, S.; Azam, S.; Khatibi, A. Factors influencing customers’ purchase decision of residential property in Selangor, Malaysia. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2019, 9, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hew, W.W.-L.; Lau, S.-H.; Goh, G.G.-G. Green Initiatives, Cost-Cutting, and Crime Control for Successful Residential Developments in Malaysia. Asia Proc. Soc. Sci. 2018, 2, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghani, E.K.; Jamal, J.; Puspitasari, E.; Gunardi, A. Factors influencing integrated reporting practices among Malaysian public listed real property companies: A sustainable development effort. Int. J. Manag. Financ. Account. 2018, 10, 144–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nor, M.Z.M.; Mohamad, A.M.; Azhar, A.; Latif, H.M.; Khalid, A.-H.M.; Yusof, Y. Legal Challenges of Musharakah Mutanaqisah as an Alternative for Property Financing in Malaysia. J. Leg. Ethical Regul. Issues 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Yap, J.B.H.; Ng, X.H. Housing affordability in Malaysia: Perception, price range, influencing factors and policies. Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razali, M.N.; Juanil, D.M. Internet business strategy: Case study of property developers in Malaysia. Pac. Rim Prop. Res. J. 2008, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, D. Understanding Digital Marketing: Marketing Strategies for Engaging the Digital Generation; Kogan Page Publishers: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Pantano, E.; Timmermans, H. Smart Retailing; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Royle, J.; Laing, A. The digital marketing skills gap: Developing a Digital Marketer Model for the communication industries. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2014, 34, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acker, O.; Gröne, F.; Akkad, F.; Pötscher, F.; Yazbek, R. Social CRM: How companies can link into the social web of consumers. J. Direct Data Digit. Mark. Pract. 2011, 13, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mazzarol, T. SMEs engagement with e-commerce, e-business and e-marketing. Small Enterp. Res. 2015, 22, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, P. Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2017, 34, 22–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwangbo, H.; Kim, Y. Session-Based Recommender System for Sustainable Digital Marketing. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saura, J.R.; Palos-Sanchez, P.; Rodríguez Herráez, B. Digital Marketing for Sustainable Growth: Business Models and Online Campaigns Using Sustainable Strategies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Copulsky, J.R.; Wolf, M.J. Relationship marketing: Positioning for the future. J. Bus. Strategy 1990, 11, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taiminen, H.M.; Karjaluoto, H. The usage of digital marketing channels in SMEs. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2015, 22, 633–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonow, A.I.; Koniagina, M.N.; Petrova, S.V.; Grunt, E.V.; Kerimkhulle, S.Y.; Shubaeva, V.G. Application of information technologies in marketing: Experience of developing countries. Rev. Espac. 2019, 40, 24. [Google Scholar]
- Dumitriu, D.; Militaru, G.; Deselnicu, D.C.; Niculescu, A.; Popescu, M.A.-M. A Perspective over Modern SMEs: Managing Brand Equity, Growth and Sustainability through Digital Marketing Tools and Techniques. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, Y.; Chowdhury Ahmed, S.; Deng, S.; Wang, H. Success of Social Media Marketing Efforts in Retaining Sustainable Online Consumers: An Empirical Analysis on the Online Fashion Retail Market. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diez-Martin, F.; Blanco-Gonzalez, A.; Prado-Roman, C. Research Challenges in Digital Marketing: Sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tao, Y.; Hinton, M. Exploring sources of competitive advantage: E-business applications within Chinese home appliance industry. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB2014), Beijing, China, 5–9 December 2005; p. 374. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y.; Ifeanyi, O. A qualitative study of e-business adoption in the real estate sector in China. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2014, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ren, Y.; Li, H.; Shen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J. What is the efficiency of fast urbanization? A China study. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Du, D.; Li, A.; Zhang, L. Survey on the applications of big data in Chinese real estate enterprise. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2014, 30, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lien, C.H.; Cao, Y. Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 41, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bingjian, S.; Changliu, N. Design and implementation of property management system based on WeChat public platform. Wirel. Internet Technol. 2016, 16, 59. [Google Scholar]
- Schubach, A. A Strong Social Media Strategy Helps Homes Sell Faster. Available online: https://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/stretch-of-chicago-river-to-get-1-5-billion-makeover-39617 (accessed on 9 December 2019).
- Crowston, K.; Sawyer, S.; Wigand, R. Investigating the interplay between structure and information and communications technology in the real estate industry. Inf. Technol. People 2001, 14, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bardhan, A.D.; Jaffee, D.; Kroll, C. The Internet, E-Commerce and the Real Estate Industry; Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Muhanna, W.; Wolf, J. The impact of e-commerce on the real estate industry: Baen and Guttery revisited. J. Real Estate Portf. Manag. 2002, 8, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmutovic, K. Impact of e-marketing orientation on marketing performance: Case of European real estate brokerage industry. In Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Management Research XIV, Opatija, Croatia, 18–20 May 2018; pp. 1308–1333. [Google Scholar]
- Spurge, V.; Almond, N. Broadband technology: How developers are responding to office occupiers’ needs. Prop. Manag. 2004, 22, 108–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brindle, F. The Impact of Digital Marketing Disruption on the Localization Industry; MultiLingual: Sandpoint, ID, USA, 2017; pp. 44–47. [Google Scholar]
- Dixon, T.; Marston, A. Taking the shopping centre online: New models in e-commerce. Prop. Manag. 2005, 23, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowley, J. The evolution of internet business strategy: The case of UK estate agency. Prop. Manag. 2005, 23, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, C.; Livingstone, N. Emerging implications of online retailing for real estate: Twenty-first century clicks and bricks. J. Corp. Real Estate 2015, 17, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, E.C.M.; Lee, C.L.; Ting, K.H. The role of Malaysian securitised real estate in a mixed-asset portfolio. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2009, 14, 208–230. [Google Scholar]
- Lin Lee, C.; Kien Hwa, T. Linkages between Malaysian housing prices, property companies and stocks. Pac. Rim Prop. Res. J. 2011, 17, 287–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newell, G.; Manaf, Z. The significance of sustainability practices by the Malaysian property sector. Local Econ. 2008, 23, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razali, M.N.; Adnan, Y.M. Sustainable property development by Malaysian property companies. Prop. Manag. 2015, 33, 451–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sood, S.M.; Chua, K.; Peng, L.Y. Sustainable development in the building sector: Green building framework in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on ISO & TQM (15-ICIT), Sustainable Development through Innovation, UNITEN Convention Centre, Kajang, Malaysia, 26–28 July 2011; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, C.L. The inflation-hedging characteristics of Malaysian residential property. Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal. 2014, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NAPIC Property Stock Report; Ministry of Finance’s Valuation and Property Service Department Putrajaya: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2019.
- Kaur, S. MM2H Scheme May Help Ease Glut; New Strait Times: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Iqbal Khadaroo, M. Business reporting on the internet in Malaysia and Singapore: A comparative study. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2005, 10, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.Y. An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2009, 12, 150–162. [Google Scholar]
- Rauniar, R.; Rawski, G.; Yang, J.; Johnson, B. Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2014, 27, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramayah, T.; Jaafar, M. Technology Usage Among construction Students The Moderating Role of Gender. J. Constr. Dev. Ctries. 2008, 13, 63–77. [Google Scholar]
- Perdue, D.J. Social Media Marketing: Gaining a Competitive Advantage by Reaching the Masses. Ph.D. Thesis, Center for Computer and Information Technology, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Scherer, R.; Siddiq, F.; Tondeur, J. The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Comput. Educ. 2019, 128, 13–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teo, T.; Lee, C.B.; Chai, C.S.; Wong, S.L. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Comput. Educ. 2009, 53, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahan, J.E. Examining the predictors of consumer response to sport marketing via digital social media. Int. J. Sport Manag. Mark. 2011, 9, 254–267. [Google Scholar]
- Fromm, J.; Garton, C. Marketing to Millennials: Reach the Largest and Most Influential Generation of Consumers Ever; Amacom: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Shirisha, M. Digital Marketing Importance in the New Era. IJETSR 2018, 5, 612–617. [Google Scholar]
- Sherman. Generate Leads for Real Estate Using these Digital Marketing Channels. Available online: https://www.lyfemarketing.com/blog/generate-leads-real-estate/ (accessed on 9 December 2019).
- Muhanna, W. E-commerce in the real estate brokerage industry. J. Real Estate Pract. Educ. 2000, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Seiler, M.; Madhavan, P.; Liechty, M. Toward an understanding of real estate homebuyer internet search behavior: An application of ocular tracking technology. J. Real Estate Res. 2012, 34, 211–241. [Google Scholar]
- Ayub, B.; Thaheem, M.J.; Ullah, F. Contingency Release During Project Execution: The Contractor’s Decision-Making Dilemma. Proj. Manag. J. 2019, 50, 734–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.M.; Sloan, T. User adoption of mobile commerce in Bangladesh: Integrating perceived risk, perceived cost and personal awareness with TAM. Int. Technol. Manag. Rev. 2017, 6, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zainab, B.; Awais Bhatti, M.; Alshagawi, M. Factors affecting e-training adoption: An examination of perceived cost, computer self-efficacy and the technology acceptance model. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2017, 36, 1261–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Tmeemy, S.M.H.; Abdul-Rahman, H.; Harun, Z. Contractors’ perception of the use of costs of quality system in Malaysian building construction projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30, 827–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, T.T.; Marthandan, G.; Chong, A.Y.L.; Ooi, K.B.; Arumugam, S. What drives Malaysian m-commerce adoption? An empirical analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2009, 109, 38046767. [Google Scholar]
- Rafique, H.; Almagrabi, A.O.; Shamim, A.; Anwar, F.; Bashir, A.K. Investigating the Acceptance of Mobile Library Applications with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Comput. Educ. 2020, 145, 103732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navimipour, N.J.; Soltani, Z. The impact of cost, technology acceptance and employees’ satisfaction on the effectiveness of the electronic customer relationship management systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 55, 1052–1066. [Google Scholar]
- Benjamin, J.D.; Chinloy, P.; Jud, G.D.; Winkler, D.T. Technology and real estate brokerage firm financial performance. J. Real Estate Res. 2005, 27, 409–426. [Google Scholar]
- Gwin, C. International comparisons of real estate e-nformation on the internet. J. Real Estate Res. 2004, 26, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Kardooni, R.; Yusoff, S.B.; Kari, F.B. Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia. Energy Policy 2016, 88, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, Q.; Thaheem, M.J.; Ullah, F.; Sepasgozar, S.M. The Performance Gap in Energy-Efficient Office Buildings: How the Occupants Can Help? Energies 2020, 13, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khorasanizadeh, H.; Honarpour, A.; Park, M.S.-A.; Parkkinen, J.; Parthiban, R. Adoption factors of cleaner production technology in a developing country: Energy efficient lighting in Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 131, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehmood, Y.; Zahoor, H.; Ullah, F. Economic-Efficiency Analysis of Rawalpindi Bypass Project: A Case Study. In Innovative Production and Construction; Wu, P., Wang, X., Eds.; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2019; pp. 531–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Sepasgozar, S.M.; Ullah, F.; Minhas, P.S. Implication of a Construction Labour Tracking System for Measuring Labour Productivity. In Innovative Production and Construction: Transforming Construction Through Emerging Technologies; Wu, P., Wang, X., Eds.; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2019; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, S.A.; Idris, K.M. The determinants of tax e-filing among tax preparers in Malaysia. World J. Soc. Sci. 2012, 2, 182–188. [Google Scholar]
- Noor, M.M. Determining critical success factors of mobile banking adoption in Malaysia. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2011, 5, 252–265. [Google Scholar]
- Ritz, W.; Wolf, M.; McQuitty, S. Digital marketing adoption and success for small businesses. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2019, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jorge, F.; Teixeira, M.S.; Correia, R.J.; Gonçalves, R.; Martins, J.; Bessa, M. A Conceptual Research Model Proposal of Digital Marketing Adoption and Impact on Low Density Tourism Regions. In Proceedings of the WorldCIST’18 2018: Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, Naples, Italy, 27–29 March 2018; pp. 528–537. [Google Scholar]
- Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K. An empirical examination of antecedents determining students’ usage of clickers in a digital marketing module. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2018, 27, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kierzkowski, A.; McQuade, S.; Waitman, R.; Zeisser, M. Current research: Marketing to the digital consumer. Mckinsey Q. 1996, 180–183. [Google Scholar]
- Parsons, A.; Zeisser, M.; Waitman, R. Organizing today for the digital marketing of tomorrow. J. Interact. Mark. 1998, 12, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shareef, M.A.; Kumar, U.; Kumar, V.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-government. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 2009, 6, 70–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wind, Y.J.; Mahajan, V. Digital Marketing: Global Strategies from the World’s Leading Experts; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Catlin, T.; Scanlan, J.; Willmott, P. Raising your digital quotient. Mckinsey Q. 2015, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Edelman, D.C. Branding in the digital age. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2010, 88, 62–69. [Google Scholar]
- Rigby, D.K.; Tager, S. Leading a Digical Transformation; Bain Co.: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Sudha, M.; Sheena, K. Impact of influencers in consumer decision process: The fashion industry. Scms J. Indian Manag. 2017, 14, 14–30. [Google Scholar]
- Sepasgozar, S.M.; Davis, S. Construction Technology Adoption Cube: An Investigation on Process, Factors, Barriers, Drivers and Decision Makers Using NVivo and AHP Analysis. Buildings 2018, 8, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Babbie, E.R. The Practice of Social Research; Nelson Education: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Onyango, K. Influence of Digital Marketing Strategies on Performance of Cut Flowers Exporting Firms in Kenya. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Taber, K.S. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res. Sci. Educ. 2018, 48, 1273–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratner, B. The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? J. Target. Meas. Anal. Mark. 2009, 17, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ashcraft, C.; McLain, B.; Eger, E. Women in Tech: The Facts; National Center for Women & Technology (NCWIT): Colorado, CO, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, M.; Jiang, J. Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Res. Cent. 2018, 31, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bach, M.P.; Zoroja, J.; Čeljo, A. An extension of the technology acceptance model for business intelligence systems: Project management maturity perspective. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag. 2017, 5, 5–21. [Google Scholar]
- Sepasgozar, S.M.; Hawken, S.; Sargolzaei, S.; Foroozanfa, M. Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 142, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delone, W.H.; McLean, E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2003, 19, 9–30. [Google Scholar]
- Kummerow, M.; Lun, J.C. Information and communication technology in the real estate industry: Productivity, industry structure and market efficiency. Telecommun. Policy 2005, 29, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benbasat, I.; Barki, H. Quo vadis TAM? J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2007, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shen, J.; Pretorius, F. Binomial option pricing models for real estate development. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 2013, 31, 418–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saura, J.R.; Palos-Sánchez, P.; Cerdá Suárez, L.M. Understanding the digital marketing environment with KPIs and web analytics. Future Internet 2017, 9, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Järvinen, J.; Karjaluoto, H. The use of Web analytics for digital marketing performance measurement. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2015, 50, 117–127. [Google Scholar]
- Edelman, D.; Heller, J. How Digital Marketing Operations Can Transform Business; McKinsey Digital; McKinsey & Company: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; p. 20036. [Google Scholar]
- John, G.; Reve, T. The reliability and validity of key informant data from dyadic relationships in marketing channels. J. Mark. Res. 1982, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giancola, P.R.; Zeichner, A. Construct validity of a competitive reaction-time aggression paradigm. Aggress. Behav. 1995, 21, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cronbach, L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16, 297–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ambrosini, V.; Bowman, C. What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2009, 11, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Technology | Function | Company | Example of Usage | Results and Sustainability Impact |
---|---|---|---|---|
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) | A technique used to obtain a high-ranking placement in the search results page of the search engine | Fed-Ex (courier delivery services) | To examine online rankings, measure traffic numbers and amounts of page views or visits and formulate keyword categories | 50% increase in traffic and 20% conversion rate (page visits and clicks); less face to face meeting required |
Search Engine Advertising (SEA) | Paid advertising based on the number of site visits and ranking | Hutch (interior design app) | Optimized Facebook ads on users viewing newsfeed, videos, slideshows and on platforms of Facebook and Instagram to boost app installs | Tenfold increase in app installs, 81% conversion rate; reducing the need for paper-based advertisements to save trees and reduce CO2 emissions |
E-mail/ Newsletter | Use of e-mail lists or third-party ads to communicate with the potential customer | Politico (political journal) | Political newsletter with an international perspective and focuses on politics from a non-partisan view | 30,000 subscribers within launch in a year, the highest rate of growth; reducing the need for paper-based advertisements to save trees and reduce CO2 emissions |
E-service/E-commerce | Conduct the commerce of goods with the assistance of telecommunication tools | FUGOO (speaker company) | Debuted and launched the product in conversion-friendly online shopping experience and campaigns that are highly targeted by featuring direct product comparisons | 300% revenue increase every year; Reduced travel, CO2 emissions, time-saving and cost |
Construct | Definition and Resources | Hypothesis | Measures |
---|---|---|---|
Perceived Ease of Use (EOU) | The perception that digital marketing will be easy to use [83]. | H1: Perceived Ease of Use has a positive effect on attitude to use digital marketing technology | EOU1, EOU2 |
Perceived Usefulness (PU) | The perception that digital marketing may be useful for future trend marketing [83]. | H2: Perceived Usefulness has a positive effect on attitude to use digital marketing technology | PU1, PU2 |
Perceived Cost (PC) | The perception that digital marketing is cost-efficient when compared to traditional marketing platforms [88]. | H3: Perceived Cost has a positive effect on attitude to use digital marketing technology | PC1 |
Greater Return (GR) | The perception that sales, income, and profit will increase from digital marketing [53]. | H4: Greater Return has a positive effect on attitude to use digital marketing technology | GR1 |
Efficiency (EF) | The perception that digital marketing is efficient for communities and companies [44]. | H5: Efficiency has a positive effect on attitude to use digital marketing technology | EF1, EF2, EF3 |
Attitude towards Use (ATU) | The system attracts more customers, enhances sales and changes their behavior for more usage [17,81] | - | ATU1, ATU2, ATU3 |
Actual Use (AU) | The system actually acquires more customers and keeps the existing ones interested [22] | H6: Actual use is positively affected by the attitude to use digital marketing technology | AU1 |
Construct | Acronym | Measures | Questions |
---|---|---|---|
Ease of Use | EOU | EOU1 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Easy to use |
EOU2 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Enhance customer service | ||
Perceived Usefulness | PU | PU1 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Useful to use |
PU2 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Branding purposes / Building awareness | ||
Perceived Cost | PC | PC1 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Low cost |
Greater Return | GR | GR1 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Greater return of revenue |
Efficiency | EF | EF1 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—High efficiency |
EF2 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Enhance customer service | ||
EF3 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Speed of communication | ||
Attitude to Use | ATU | ATU1 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Able to obtain more customer information |
ATU2 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Helps in sales to existing customers | ||
ATU3 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Changing customer behavior | ||
Actual Use | AU | AU1 | Please give your opinion on the factors of digital marketing being used—Customer acquisition |
Capability Category | Capability | Digital Branders | Customer Experience Designers | Demand Generators | Product Innovators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insight and Analytics | Segmentation and assessments needed | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
Measurement | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Real-time decision making | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
Personalization and targeting | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
Smart Platforms and Activation | Optimized content | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Innovation | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |
Social influence and advocacy | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
Omnichannel experience | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
Elements | Tools to Achieve Element Sustainability Objective |
---|---|
Attract | Promotions, Banner ads, Mnemonic branding, Audience creation, ‘Piggy-back’ advertising |
Engage | Unique content, Information content, Forum groups, Transaction capabilities, Interactive content |
Retain | Dynamic content, Security features, Loyalty programs, Interactive functions, Digital communities, Transaction capabilities |
Learn | Feedback via online surveys, Information capture, Supporting chat groups, Continuous preference learning |
Relate | Real-time interactions, Customized webpages, Linkages to core business |
Digital Marketing Strategy | Sustainability Domain | References |
---|---|---|
A good digital marketing strategy requires companies to: Manage the relationships between customers Allow customers to determine price and value Advocates and engage the customers Engage customers as co-creators of value | Cost, Value Creation | [113] |
McKinsey’s ‘digital quotient’ strategy has been introduced where the company can work towards digital marketing in 4 aspects: Strategy: Vision to meet short and long-term digital business aspirations Culture: Produce mindset which allows digital opportunities Organization: Structure and talent that are necessary for supporting digital strategy. Capabilities: Systems and technology allow digital strategy goals to be achieved | Innovation, Inclusiveness | [114] |
The customer decision journey has been introduced where the stages of digital marketing should be monitored in the decision journey, such as “evaluate” and “advocate” stages. | Performance Evaluation | [115] |
The digital marketing strategy is based on the industry and condition of the company. Industry evolution stage: Moving fast, moving in the middle or Moving slow Beginner: Partner or Perish, Seek the pass and follow the leader, Foundational capabilities to be built Intermediate: Hasten innovations and acquisitions, Breakout ambition to be set, Share gaining from scale capability successes. Expert: Lead customer path-breaking, amaze customers, dispirit competitors, avoid outrunning customers | Innovation, Value Creation, Retention | [116,117] |
The Demographics Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 160 | 57.3 |
Female | 119 | 42.7 | |
Unspecified | - | - | |
Respondents’ Age | 20–30 | 124 | 44.4 |
31–40 | 70 | 25.1 | |
41 and above | 75 | 30.5 | |
Job/Role | Marketing | 136 | 49.1 |
IT | 103 | 37.0 | |
Others | 40 | 13.3 | |
Company’s Age | 1–10 | 146 | 52.3 |
11–20 | 62 | 22.2 | |
21–30 | 29 | 10.4 | |
31–40 | 27 | 9.68 | |
41 and above | 15 | 5.37 | |
Company names | Alam Harmoni Properties | 29 | 10.4 |
Asia Green Development | 58 | 21.0 | |
Idram Land | 20 | 7.2 | |
Jesselton Peak | 20 | 7.2 | |
Juara Andaman | 26 | 9.3 | |
Keramat Inn | 27 | 9.7 | |
Mah Sing Group and Swisspac | 27 | 9.7 | |
Syarikat Pemborong Saadlow | 20 | 7.2 | |
Titijaya Land Berhad | 26 | 9.3 | |
Tropicana Corporation Group | 26 | 9.5 | |
Location | Kuala Lumpur | 104 | 37.3 |
Penang | 175 | 62.7 |
Factors | Acronym | Mean | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
Able to obtain more customer information | ATU1 | 4.28 | 1st |
Easy to use | EOU1 | 4.13 | 2nd |
Useful to use | PU1 | 4.1 | 3rd |
Branding purposes/Building awareness | PU2 | 4.1 | 4th |
Facilitating dialogue to reach out customers | EOU2 | 3.99 | 5th |
High efficiency | EF1 | 3.94 | 6th |
Enhance customer service | EF2 | 3.9 | 7th |
Speed of communication | EF3 | 3.81 | 8th |
Help in sales to existing customers | ATU2 | 3.61 | 9th |
Greater return of revenue | GR1 | 3.53 | 10th |
Low cost | PC1 | 3.52 | 11th |
Customer acquisition | AU1 | 3.49 | 12th |
Changing customer behavior | ATU3 | 2.75 | 13th |
Construct | Definition and Resources | Measures | Smartness Indicators | Mean | Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital Service Quality (DSQ) | The perception that the digital services are efficient, reliable and involves latest technologies [21] | DSQ1 | Easy to access and use | 4.5 | 1st |
DSQ2 | The quality of services | 4.34 | 7th | ||
DSQ3 | The opinion on the selection of property type | 4.28 | 10th | ||
DSQ4 | Virtual Tour | 4.07 | 13th | ||
DSQ5 | 360 degrees Images/Videos | 3.95 | 14th | ||
DSQ6 | Virtual reality | 3.85 | 15th | ||
Digital Information Quality (DIQ) | The perception that the digital information is easy, accurate and comprehensive [22,129] | DIQ1 | ‘Nearby amenities’ content | 4.49 | 2nd |
DIQ2 | ‘Nearby facilities’ content | 4.46 | 3rd | ||
DIQ3 | The quality of information | 4.44 | 4th | ||
DIQ4 | The quality of search facilities | 4.38 | 5th | ||
DIQ5 | The accuracy of information | 4.36 | 6th | ||
Digital System Quality (DSYQ) | The perception that the digital system is efficient, smooth and has consistent graphics [21,24] | DSYQ1 | The quality of system function | 4.33 | 8th |
DSYQ2 | The quality of category heading | 4.28 | 9th | ||
DSYQ3 | The quality of graphics | 4.2 | 11th | ||
DSYQ4 | The featured listing pages | 4.2 | 12th |
Questions | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
Are you satisfied with the current digital skills in your company? | 81.7% | 18.3% |
Is your company utilizing any smart digital marketing technology? e.g., SEO, SEA, or others | 54.5% | 44.4% |
Does your company update its digital technology regularly or adopt new smart ones? | 44.4% | 55.2% |
Does your company use any metrics to measure its smart digital marketing processes? | 38.4% | 60.6% |
Do you think that smart digital marketing skills should be improved in your organization? | 57.7% | 42.3% |
Do you think smart digital marketing is important for property development companies? | 67.4% | 32.6% |
Does your company have a smart digital marketing strategy? | 42.7% | 57.0% |
Is your company aligned towards smart digital marketing in terms of culture and organization? | 41.9% | 58.1% |
Do you think smart digital marketing is required for property development? | 71.0% | 28.7% |
Are you better than your competitors in terms of smart digital marketing? | 40.1% | 58.8% |
Do you think smart digital marketing can help in property sales transactions? | 66.7% | 33.0% |
Does your company allocate a certain budget towards different smart digital marketing technologies? | 32.3% | 67.7% |
Is your company active on at least one social media platform? | 82.8% | 16.8% |
Does your company update its website regularly? | 75.6% | 24.4% |
Observed Variables | Loading | Outer VIF | Observed Variables | Loading | Outer VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATU1 | 0.578 | 1.369 | ST17 | 0.747 | 3.557 |
ATU2 | 0.891 | 1.638 | ST18 | 0.633 | 6.123 |
ATU3 | 0.659 | 1.326 | ST2 | 0.506 | 3.955 |
AU1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ST3 | 0.741 | 4.104 |
EF1 | 0.813 | 1.712 | ST4 | 0.827 | 4.898 |
EF2 | 0.845 | 1.72 | ST5 | 0.535 | 4.261 |
EF3 | 0.651 | 1.095 | ST6 | 0.836 | 5.118 |
EOU2 | 0.92 | 1.468 | ST7 | 0.842 | 4.235 |
GR1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ST8 | 0.826 | 4.672 |
PC1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ST9 | 0.857 | 4.241 |
PU1 | 0.858 | 1.324 | EOU1 | 0.578 | 1.468 |
PU2 | 0.871 | 1.324 | - | - | - |
ST1 | 0.669 | 3.345 | - | - | - |
ST10 | 0.859 | 4.462 | - | - | - |
ST11 | 0.856 | 4.49 | - | - | - |
ST12 | 0.811 | 4.025 | - | - | - |
ST13 | 0.785 | 3.656 | - | - | - |
ST14 | 0.63 | 2.95 | - | - | - |
ST15 | 0.819 | 3.703 | - | - | - |
ST16 | 0.571 | 4.256 | - | - | - |
Selected Factors | Cronbach’s Alpha | rho_A | CR | AVE | Q2 | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOU | 0.722 | 0.77 | 0.875 | 0.778 | - | - |
PU | 0.662 | 0.663 | 0.855 | 0.747 | - | - |
PC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
EF | 0.657 | 0.666 | 0.816 | 0.6 | - | - |
GR | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
AT | 0.514 | 0.556 | 0.759 | 0.521 | 0.361 | 0.719 |
AU | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
ST | 0.953 | 0.956 | 0.958 | 0.564 | 0.187 | 0.366 |
Selected Factors | EOU | PU | PC | EF | GR | AT | AU | ST |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOU | 0.882 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
PU | 0.827 | 0.864 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
PC | 0.484 | 0.423 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
EF | 0.82 | 0.753 | 0.553 | 0.774 | - | - | - | - |
GR | 0.476 | 0.432 | 0.748 | 0.558 | 1 | - | - | - |
AT | 0.666 | 0.589 | 0.5 | 0.751 | 0.643 | 0.722 | - | - |
AU | 0.364 | 0.435 | 0.337 | 0.416 | 0.491 | 0.619 | 1 | - |
ST | 0.363 | 0.384 | 0.321 | 0.418 | 0.472 | 0.605 | 0.591 | 0.751 |
Path and Direction | H | Original Sample | Sample Mean | STDEV | T Statistics | p Values | Inner VIF | f 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOU→ATU | H1 | 0.219 | 0.218 | 0.071 | 3.062 | 0.002 | 4.48 | 0.038 |
PU→ATU | H2 | −0.146 | −0.149 | 0.07 | 2.094 | 0.036 | 3.536 | 0.021 |
PC→ATU | H3 | −0.107 | −0.11 | 0.051 | 2.093 | 0.036 | 2.455 | 0.017 |
EF→ATU | H4 | 0.458 | 0.46 | 0.079 | 5.808 | 0 | 3.682 | 0.203 |
GR→ATU | H5 | 0.272 | 0.272 | 0.058 | 4.662 | 0 | 2.746 | 0.096 |
ATU→ST | H6 | 0.605 | 0.609 | 0.046 | 13.162 | 0 | 1 | 0.577 |
AU→ATU | H7 | 0.315 | 0.316 | 0.05 | 6.266 | 0 | 1.463 | 0.242 |
Selected Factors | Cronbach’s Alpha | rho_A | CR | AVE | Q2 | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOU | 0.722 | 1.533 | 0.849 | 0.741 | - | - |
PU | 0.662 | 1.451 | 0.82 | 0.702 | - | - |
PC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
GR | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
EF | 0.657 | 0.652 | 0.812 | 0.59 | - | - |
ATU | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.355 | 0.671 |
ST | 0.953 | 0.96 | 0.959 | 0.57 | 0.242 | 0.508 |
AU | 0.514 | 0.553 | 0.76 | 0.522 | 0.308 | 0.357 |
Path and Direction | H | Original Sample | Sample Mean | STDEV | T Statistics | p Values | Inner VIF | f 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOU→AU | H1 | −0.07 | −0.065 | 0.115 | 0.608 | 0.543 | 3.197 | 0.002 |
PU→AU | H2 | 0.423 | 0.426 | 0.085 | 4.968 | 0 | 2.397 | 0.12 |
PC→AU | H3 | −0.105 | −0.103 | 0.082 | 1.283 | 0.199 | 2.431 | 0.007 |
GR→AU | H4 | 0.403 | 0.402 | 0.07 | 5.768 | 0 | 2.478 | 0.105 |
EF→AU | H5 | 0.042 | 0.039 | 0.122 | 0.348 | 0.728 | 3.46 | 0.001 |
EF→ATU | H6 | 0.774 | 0.775 | 0.027 | 28.407 | 0 | 1 | 1.49 |
AU→ST | H7 | 0.454 | 0.454 | 0.05 | 9.164 | 0 | 1.565 | 0.232 |
ATU→ST | H8 | 0.276 | 0.278 | 0.07 | 3.962 | 0 | 1.565 | 0.086 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Low, S.; Ullah, F.; Shirowzhan, S.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E.; Lin Lee, C. Smart Digital Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Property Development: A Case of Malaysia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5402. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135402
Low S, Ullah F, Shirowzhan S, Sepasgozar SME, Lin Lee C. Smart Digital Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Property Development: A Case of Malaysia. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13):5402. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135402
Chicago/Turabian StyleLow, Sheen, Fahim Ullah, Sara Shirowzhan, Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, and Chyi Lin Lee. 2020. "Smart Digital Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Property Development: A Case of Malaysia" Sustainability 12, no. 13: 5402. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135402
APA StyleLow, S., Ullah, F., Shirowzhan, S., Sepasgozar, S. M. E., & Lin Lee, C. (2020). Smart Digital Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Property Development: A Case of Malaysia. Sustainability, 12(13), 5402. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135402