1. Introduction
If one navigates through particular cities, the confrontation with outdoor advertisements is almost guaranteed; their presence permeating different surfaces. From posters inside trains, billboards positioned on roadsides, to metro station walls. The proliferation of this form of advertising has a profound effect on the look and feel of a city. Due to the widespread coverage across contemporary cities, Cronin [
1] (p. 78) argues that advertisements’ impact on the urban landscape is directly implicated in and sown into the “particular social arrangement of structures and flows of people that we call ‘a city’.”. As part of the fabric we consider urban, it is curious that little work has explored how notions of landscapes are formed by their spatial distribution [
1,
2].
As a primary way that we “experience, make sense of and remember” [
3] (p. 1410) urban landscapes, we address how city dwellers visually derive a sense of place through the interaction of outdoor advertisements whilst moving through space. Degen et al. [
4] describe how the material features of designed urban spaces are “producing a city of surfaces, calculated for a primarily visual effect”. City landscapes are shown often to be ”marketable commodities” [
3]; little is said, however, of the empirical experience of commercialised environments—i.e., those containing advertisements. Rather than broadly examining ”the city”, we explore the daily urban experiences of specific areas containing advertisements, focussing on cyclists. While commercial landscapes have been studied for those perceived by pedestrians [
5,
6], little has been said for the experience of a cyclist. By drawing attention to the potential that advertising has to shape and influence the personal experience of cycling, we raise critical questions of whether they are detrimental to the encouragement and development of cycling as a sustainable mode of transport.
By focussing on the practice of cycling, we reverse the ”common-sensing of some landscape’s” [
7] less tangible facets, focussing on the mood and atmosphere of urban space, influenced by proximity, alignment, pace [
8], route, form and light [
9,
10]. Cycling offers a unique, embodied experience of urban landscapes [
11]; which is to say that visual experiences are multi-sensory, involving the aural, tactile, oral, olfactory and kinaesthetic senses [
12,
13,
14,
15]. The varying practices of cycling, from rural leisure seekers to urban commuters [
13], follow different imperatives, expressing context-specific engagements with urban space. As McKenna and Whatling [
16] (p. 4) argue, the “‘urban embodiment’ of commuter cycling is different to that of commuter drivers, pedestrians, or even leisure cyclists”. We investigate the specificity in the embodied experience of commuting cyclists, exploring how the imperative of travelling to and from work becomes entangled with how the outdoor advertising landscapes are perceived.
The paper aims to address the following questions:
(1) What role do the rhythms of urban cycle routes play in shaping the experience of commuting in Amsterdam for those exposed to outdoor advertising?
(2) By highlighting context-specific and embodied experiences of a cyclist, can we better evaluate commercial landscapes for sustainable development?
2. Cycling through the Advertising Landscape
Everyday rhythms such as walking, cycling and other forms of mobility, are central to how the city is inhabited [
17]. The various lived experiences of commuter cycling are arguably missed in quantitative methodologies (e.g., [
11,
18]). We reveal a nuanced set of accounts, specific to the social and cultural contexts of a cycle route used by commuters in Amsterdam.
Cyclists commuting each day undergo predictable patterns of activity, the most basic level being the route taken, yet they also negotiate the varied conditions of route duration, timing, traffic tempo, cyclist formations, weather or terrain type. The interaction between the cyclist and urban elements develop distinct ”urban rhythms”. Urban rhythms usefully describe how structures, such as timetables, routines and social obligations, can shape a person’s path through space, but also accounting for “spatial qualities, sensations and intersubjective habits” [
19] (p. 2). The concept is instructive for investigating daily time structures and processes that implicitly reproduce the conditions of commuting and negotiating “transport problems and choices” [
20] (p. 85). For example, Van Duppen and Spierings [
14] compare the daily rhythms of negotiating road space and the inherent management of time schedules for commuting cyclists in Utrecht (NL) with that of the planner’s perspective (bound to rigid spatial conceptions of transportation routes).
As urban environments reproduce and transform, people respond to urban processes and forms through an on-going “incremental urbanism” [
17] (p. 33). Individual rhythmic improvisations can emerge among cyclists who ”tactically learn” [
17] the everyday spatial structures between home and work. Brown and Spinney [
12] examined the bodily engagement of cyclists in continually sensing the subjective rhythms of the road, highlighting the heightened tension between pedestrians and cyclists on the road with vehicular traffic. On the other hand, the complexity found in daily commutes and frequent exposure to advertising may actually lead to reduced sensitivity of the perceptual memory [
21] or a “blasé attitude” [
22] (p. 24).
Focusing on rhythms of mobility, Cronin [
1,
23] shows how advertising companies organise city space and frame people’s experience by manipulating rhythms such as commuting. A larger size and amount of billboards are placed in strategic locations based on the flow of people (i.e., highways, pedestrian high streets) or large numbers of static viewers (i.e., bus stops, traffic crossings). Cronin [
1], however, applied limited empirical analysis to the way individuals perceive and understand outdoor advertisements or the variation between transportation types. Advertising, rather than a predominantly ”spectacular” [
5] feature of the landscape, organises city space in a diverse yet mundane manner, marking the “everyday, routine experience of travelling to and around cities” [
1], (p. 78). Hence, our focus is on addressing the experiential consequences of everyday travel. This research expands upon the questions raised by Cronin on the consequences of commercial urban spaces, with a focus on the individual’s embodied experience of movement on a bicycle.
Using ethnographic examination of the experience of walking in shopping malls, Degen et al. [
4] derive several concepts aimed at capturing the distinct gaze experienced when in commercial spaces. The ”shopping look” apprehends the commercial landscape of malls in a “thicker, focused stare […] guided by our sense of touch and smell” [
4] (p. 1910). As opposed to the ”shopping look”, the converse known as the ”manoeuvring look” [
4] is adopted, that draws little distinction between the surroundings; essentially describing a way of looking when moving through a commercial environment that is distanced and concerned with movement, rather than specific features. Our fieldwork evaluates how the interaction within commercial spaces such as malls, differs from the situated spatial awareness of commercial signs in urban environments designed for transport.
A key practice for advertisers to tap into the commercial rhythms of urban travellers, objectified as consumers, is the goal of synchronisation achieved using measurement techniques—e.g., travel surveys and geodemographic segmentation [
24]. These commercial techniques influence the attempt to structure and control daily movement in cities, identifying and regulating rhythmic conventions of individuals and groups. In the Dutch context, to ”tap into” the linear rhythms of commuters travelling through certain travel routes, Dutch outdoor advertising research company Buitenreclame-Onderzoek has utilised classification techniques that factor in differences between commuter types (i.e., pedestrian, bicycle, car, bus). The roadside visibility model that has been adopted for cyclists combines the variables for vehicles (i.e., faster speed than pedestrians) as well as those for pedestrians (i.e., much longer run-up time than vehicles). The final output claims that ”the final cyclist hit rate was comparable to that of pedestrians and identical in most cases”—a hybrid ”pedyclist”. Although following a logical connection and given statistical validity, this does not necessarily translate to the lived embodied experience of cycling compared to walking or driving in Amsterdam, or indeed within specific contexts. Jiron [
6] describes the personal sense of invasion created by advertisements covering the interior of trains for those commuting. The familiarity, while sitting, of their visual appearance, yet alienation to the calls to action for consumption were linked to the synchronicity and experience of travelling to work. Ethnographic examination such as Jiron’s [
6], importantly shows how one might feel using particular transportation and what this means for people’s understanding of advertisements. Roadside advertisements differ drastically from other formats such as those in trains (see e.g., [
3], for the redefinition of urban areas created by outdoor advertisements of differing scales and technologies) and require acknowledgement of what this might mean for users encountering them.
Cycling requires negotiating the unpredictability of other cyclists’ movement and alternative crossing patterns [
14], adapting to different speeds, subtle body language, gestures and indications. These negotiations alter the ability of cyclists to process urban features, such as advertisements. For instance, the obstruction of view from other cyclists can vary depending on the positioning near traffic lights, space available on a path or volume of traffic. Speed also comes into play, limiting the amount of sensory input the cyclist can handle [
8]. These bodily encounters offer various possible experiences, emotions, moods [
1] and attitudes, which Pike [
25] argues develop localised spatial associations with advertisements. What this suggests, is that rather than individual differences in behaviour in commercial space being linked to age, gender, class or race [
21], bodily sensing also plays an important role in the behaviour and perception of advertisements.
The future value to advertisers in measuring and regulating bodily rhythms of moving consumers lies in digital outdoor screens. Real-time data feeds (i.e., temperature activated content) and interactivity (i.e., Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity) has led to the timing and engagement of messages directed to urban dwellers achieving advances in accuracy. The bodily rhythms of urban dwellers are increasingly the target of synchronisation of weather-related advertising. Digital technology is enabling advertising targeting to change the messaging displayed, depending on differences in embodied experience. Here, one sees the efficacy of strategies being adopted by advertisers, and how people’s daily rhythms are in constant contestation and flux, depending on how visual landscapes are arranged and manipulated for commercial gain.
5. Discussion and Conclusions
This research has drawn attention to the way in which urban landscapes generate meaning and distinctions from the movement of cycling. Features of commuter landscapes, such as advertisements, take on different characteristics through rhythmic cycles of change, unique to the social and cultural contexts of Amsterdam. Within the case study area, the frequency of the advertisements and the positioning along the cycle paths—low down, faced toward the line of sight of cyclists, rather than cars—reflects the intentional engineering of advertisements to target cyclists. This type of strategy is a result of the cultural significance of cycling in Amsterdam, and the knowledge that such changes will enable advertisers to benefit from more targeted mechanisms.
The use of video is a developing field of enquiry for understanding fleeting aspects of mobility [
30]. We used video in order to capture visual attention and bodily engagement with cycle paths. With a lack of protocols to use, a great deal of trial and error was necessary for successful results. The application of filming cyclists in cities with bicycle infrastructure or popularity of cycling different to Amsterdam will present its own unique safety issues, adaptations and challenges. Future research aimed at understanding the role of the body in perceiving advertising, and the landscape more broadly, is encouraged through this methodology.
Previous research that has applied the theoretical framework of urban rhythms to cyclists in cities [
12,
14] has yet to consider how cyclists connect and overlap with the distinct rhythms of landscapes concentrated with outdoor advertising. We have shown this in several areas.
The repetition of cycling on the same route to commute resulted in not simply recalling or forgetting advertisements, but incrementally learning urban landscape features. The advertising spokespersons interviewed revealed that the advertisements along Amstelveenseweg operated within 2-week campaign cycles. The cyclists interviewed did not demonstrate a conscious awareness of these exact time frames, but instead an embodied synchronisation with the rhythms of advertisement change implemented along the route. The high concentration of smaller roadside advertisements also worked against the ”synchronisation” of advertisement rhythms with commuting rhythms, as some participants became desensitised to the lowered environmental contrast, reducing the sensitivity of their perceptual memory [
21]. These divergent yet connected modes of experiencing the landscape are not intended as a typology; instead they point out the diverse and complex ways that the commercial aspects of cities are visually engaged with. Rather than enticed by a ”hypnotic spectacle” [
5], they are grounded in context-specific spatial references, structured by personal rhythms. In addition, the linear rhythms of commuting daily by bicycle connected with the cyclical rhythms of weather, nature and the body to produce distinct moods that had implications for responses to advertisements.
Because of the complex interplay of navigating the road and its users, attention was at times distracted from the roadside advertisements, or by them, disrupting the level of momentum achieved. It was very important to cyclists that informal crossings were frequent, reconfiguring the anticipated ”dwell time” [
1] accorded to outdoor advertisement locations. These specificities of the route, when linked to particular temporal rhythms (the congested feeling of crossing points during rush hour), afforded their own place-temporalities, with different ways of visually understanding the advertising landscape. Those whose schedules were aligned toward consumption rhythms of making the opening hours of shops exhibited a ”shopping look” toward commercial elements of the landscape. Equally, the reconfiguration of navigating the urban routes containing advertising was also illustrated by several of the cyclists examined, who ”tactically learned” [
17] to commute and cycle through alternative routes not containing advertising by adjusting their temporal rhythms.
We argue that the multi-sensory experience of cycling is far too particular to clump cars and pedestrians together to classify visual responses to roadside advertisements. For example, the subtleties of movement [
38], limited sensory processing [
8], different proximity to ads as well as varying visual obstruction from other cyclists. Participants highlighted walking as a separate engagement with the city, which generated place-specific associations [
25] with advertising in urban space. This difference was also explained by the specific cultural meaning that walking has for residents of Amsterdam compared to other cities [
27,
39]; walking being more leisurely.
By examining the distinctive embodied experience attributed to cycling along Amstelveenseweg, critical questions are raised. Following the increased public–private partnerships developing in contemporary cities [
2], the interest in creating a pleasurable urban environment could well become part of a discussion between advertising agencies and urban authorities. Iveson [
2] (p. 164) highlights that rather than the problem being “too much advertising” it is rather, questioning the way public-private partnerships are set up between advertising agencies and local authorities. In many cities, partnerships have been premised on restricting access to public control of public media (i.e., graffiti, flyers, posters, etc.) as well as monetising street furniture and funding infrastructure projects with the potential for housing advertising, usually aimed at bus and train stops. Future research could also explore the necessity to integrate green features along cycling commuter routes, as a way of bringing solutions to achieving a sustainable urban space that makes use of the investment brought by advertising for cyclists as well as other urban citizens. As it is the case that the amount of cyclists in Amsterdam represents such a large captive audience for advertisers, there is certainly political leverage for discussions concerning the regulation of urban space that advertisers have access to shaping, and the citywide landscape. Indeed, cyclists may wish to resist and challenge the current access advertisers have to the landscape. Cycling has greater potential for sustainable growth when citizens are given knowledge and awareness of how and why cycle routes have been designed. Drawing attention to the variable ways in which specific routes are experienced for cyclists at the embodied level highlights city-level issues for policy makers concerned with what constitutes a flourishing city. Urban planning decisions should consider the effects that mono-featured advertising environments have on the senses, which have the potential to undermine the restorative, relaxing and pleasurable benefits of cycling.
The ability to precisely target commuters in urban spaces based on the idea of consumption moods, is being expanded through the use of consumer data linked to digital outdoor advertisement screens. Live data feeds such as climate variables, live events and interaction with mobile devices, are making temporal synchronisation with urban rhythms calculated [
3,
23] and aligned in a way never seen before. Precision in data-led targeting is extending those environments designed for commercial purposes (i.e., shopping malls), described by Biehl-Missal and Saren [
40] as “atmospheres of seduction”. Questions may be raised as to whether the increase in digital outdoor ads will structure urban spaces in a way that becomes invasive, precluding consent by users of public space. It is yet to be determined if it is more favourable to see advertisements digitally synchronised with personal rhythms, serving arguably more relevant messages to accurately matched audiences, rather than a cascade of meaningless signs. Given the fact that digital outdoor screens are now being introduced specifically to cyclists’ commuting routes in Amsterdam, the nature and experience of commuting are likely to change dramatically. These ”temporally quantified” [
23] spaces benefit from the desensitisation of those exposed to commercial environments, aligning people’s daily rhythms in a subtle yet ever-present way. From an experiential perspective, questions arise regarding if the movement and illumination associated with these screens become a hazard [
37] to cyclists if implemented in busy and congested areas that require careful attention. Advertisers hold data and research on how many cyclists pass these points. Little discussion with local authorities is had over how this data could be used by the local government to prevent accidents, as well as gain a fuller picture of how cyclists navigate different routes.
At the wider level, having aimed our focus at one of the most affluent areas of Amsterdam, the concentration and quality of advertising here was by no means a coincidence. The abundance of corporate business, wealthy surrounding neighbourhoods and educational excellence serves to attract advertising, but also to generate revenue for local authorities through the partnership deals to acquire advertising space. The result being that advertising sites such as bus stops, metro stations and cycle paths receive the necessary investment for proper maintenance and renewal. The circumstances of less affluent neighbourhoods, who are of secondary value to advertisers intending to target affluent audiences, in turn become at risk of neglect by local authorities who rely on such partnerships. Sustainability research ought to consider how this process operates. Investigating the personal experiences of cyclists across different neighbourhoods provides a valuable insight into these disparities.