Perception of the Impacts of Urban Mobility Interventions in the Niterói Oceanic Region, Brazil
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Bibliographic Research
2.3. Survey
- n = Sample size
- θ = Confidence level chosen, expressed as the number of standard deviations
- p = Percentage at which the phenomenon occurs
- q = Supplementary percentage (100 − p)
- e = Maximum allowed sample error
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Questionnaire Used in the Survey
- Name (optional):
- Borough:
- Age:
- Sex:
- Education: Graduation ( ) Master’s degree ( ) Doctoral degree ( )
- You are a CVT user: Frequent ( ) Sporadically ( ) Never use ( )
- Do you think that the implementation of the CVT generated significant changes (positive and/or negative impacts) in the region? YES ( ) NO ( ).If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- Do you think the CVT has improved traffic in the region? YES ( ) NO ( ).If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- Do you think that the implementation of the CVT generated significant changes (positive and/or negative impacts) in your daily life? YES ( ) NO ( ).If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- Did the possible impacts, mentioned below, generate effects for the region under discussion?
- (a)
- Change in air quality (dust/vehicular gases)? YES ( ) NO ( )If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- (b)
- Change in noise levels? YES ( ) NO ( )If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- (c)
- Alteration of the (natural) landscape? YES ( ) NO ( )If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- (d)
- Alteration of the local dynamics (attraction of new residents, commercial and service development, greater movement and flow of people)? YES ( ) NO ( )If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- (e)
- Change in mobility in the region (generation of traffic on internal roads, pressure on public transport)? YES ( ) NO ( )If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- (f)
- Change in the urban landscape? YES ( ) NO ( )If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- (g)
- Change in the population’s standard of living (appreciation or devaluation of real estate, increase of commercial and service activities, generation of employment and income)? YES ( ) NO ( )If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
- (h)
- Change in the safety of the population (vehicle and pedestrian accidents, levels of violence)? YES ( ) NO ( )If YES, these changes were: POSITIVE ( ) or NEGATIVE ( )
References
- Smart Cities Council. Urban Mobility in the Smart City Age. 2014. Available online: https://smartcitiescouncil.com/system/tdf/public_resources/Urban%20mobility.pdf?file=1%26type=node%26id=1272 (accessed on 7 January 2020).
- Rushton, C.E. The Internet of Things; Davies, J., Fortuna, C., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Timmermans, J.S.; Beroggi, G.E.G. Conflict resolution in sustainable infrastructure management. Saf. Sci. 2000, 35, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, C.M.; Amekudzi, A. Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: Definitions, indicators, and metrics. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2005, 11, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ugwu, O.O.; Haupt, T.C. Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability: A South African construction industry perspective. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 665–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klevas, V.; Streimikienea, D.; Kleviene, A. Sustainability assessment of the energy projects implementation in regional scale. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2009, 13, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, L.; Asce, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X. Key Assessment Indicators for the Sustainability of Infrastructure Projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2011, 137, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sawyer, C. Territorial Infrastructure. In The Mesh Book—Landscape/Infrastructure; Raxworthy, J., Blood, J., Eds.; RMIT University Press: Melbourne, Australia, 2004; pp. 266–277. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, J.C. Roads belong in the Urban Landscape. Nord. J. Archit. Res. 2013, 25, 93–112. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, A.L.; Van Kamp, I. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review of Transport Noise Interventions and Their Impacts on Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Riley-Powell, A.; Lee, G.; Naik, N.; Jensen, K.; O’Neal, C.; Salmón-Mulanovich, G.; Hartinger, S.M.; Bausch, D.G.; Paz-Soldan, V. The impact of road construction on subjective well-being in communities in Madre de Dios, Peru. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morillas, J.M.B.; Gozalo, G.R.; González, D.M.; Moraga, P.A.; Vílchez-Gómez, R. Noise Pollution and Urban Planning. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2018, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Druckman, A.; Gallagher, J.; Gatersleben, B.; Allison, S.; Eisenman, T.; Hoang, U.; Hama, S.; Tiwari, A.; Sharma, A.; et al. The nexus between air pollution, green infrastructure and human health. Environ. Int. 2019, 133, 105181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Januchowski-Hartley, S.R.; Jézéquel, C.; Tedesco, P.A. Modelling built infrastructure heights to evaluate common assumptions in aquatic conservation. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bezerra, B.S.; Santos, A.L.L.D.; Delmonico, D.V.G. Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities—A case study in Brazil. Transp. Res. Part A 2020, 132, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, E.; Millington, A.; Tomlinson, P. Understanding Community Severance Part 1: Views of Practitioners and Communities. Report for UK Department for Transport. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01441647.2015.1077286 (accessed on 10 December 2019).
- Anciaes, P.R.; Metcalfe, P.J.; Heywood, C. Social impacts of road traffic: Perceptions and priorities of local residents. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2017, 35, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pardo-Bosch, F.; Aguado, A. Sustainability as the key to prioritize investments in public infrastructures. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2016, 60, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahrig, L.; Rytwinski, T. Effects of roads on animal abundance: An empirical review and synthesis. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14, 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, V.J.; Smith, W.P.; Betts, M.G. Toward Understanding the Ecological Impact of Transportation Corridors; USDA Forest Service: Portland, OR, USA, 2011; Volume 486, p. 40. [Google Scholar]
- Frair, J.L.; Merrill, E.H.; Hawthorne, L.B.; Morales, J.M. Thresholdsbin landscape connectivity and mortality risks in response to growing road networks. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 1504–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2003, 34, 487–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heal, M.R.; Kumar, P.; Harrison, R.M. Particles, air quality, policy and health. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6606–6630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karagulian, F.; Belis, C.A.; Dora, C.F.C.; Prüss-Ustün, A.M.; Bonjour, S.; Adair-Rohani, H.; Amann, M. Contributions to cities’ ambient particulate matter (PM): A systematic review of local source contributions at global level. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 120, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cowie, C.T.; Rose, N.; Gillett, R.; Walter, S.; Marks, G.B. Redistribution of traffic related air pollution associated with a new road tunnel. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 2918–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, R.; Wang, S.; Shi, C.; Wang, W.; Zhao, H.; Liu, R.; Chen, L.; Zhou, B. Study on the traffic air pollution inside and outside a road tunnel in Shanghai, China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rissanen, R.; Ifver, J.; Hasselberg, M.; Berg, H.-Y. Quality of life following road traffic injury: The impact of age and gender. Qual. Life Res. 2020, 29, 1587–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tandel, B. Importance of urban traffic noise pollution in sustainable transportation planning: A review. IJETAETS 2011, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- De Kluijver, H.; Stoter, J. Noise mapping and GIS: Optimising quality and efficiency of noise effect studies. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2003, 27, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Monazam, M.R.; Karimi, E.; Abbaspour, M.; Nassiri, P.; Taghavi, L. Spatial traffic noise pollution assessment—A case study. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2015, 28, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- PIARC. Tunnel Impact on Outside Air Quality. 2008. Available online: https://tunnelsmanual.piarc.org/en/operation-and-maintenance-environmental-issues/noise-and-vibration (accessed on 7 January 2020).
- May, A.; Boehler-Baedeker, S.; Delgado, L.; Durlin, T.; Enache, M.; van der Pas, J.-W. Appropriate national policy frameworks for sustainable urban mobility plans. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2017, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barcellos, P.L.; Costa, M.; Cataldi, M.; Carlos, A.P.S. Management of non-structural measures in the prevention of flash floods: A case study in the city of Duque de Caxias, state of Rio de Janeiro. Nat. Hazards Braz. 2017, 89, 313–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Gregorio, L.T.; Soares, C.A.P. Post-disaster housing recovery guidelines for development countries based on experiences in the American continent. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017, 24, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sustainable Mobility for All. 2017. Global Mobility Report 2017: Tracking Sector Performance. Washington DC, License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0. Available online: http://sum4all.org/publications/global-mobility-report-2017 (accessed on 10 December 2019).
- Tyrinopoulos, Y.; Antoniou, C. Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2013, 5, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brasil. Lei Federal 10.257/2001- Estatuto da Cidade. 2011. Available online: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/LEIS_2001/L10257.html (accessed on 10 December 2019).
- Lima, E.G.; Chinelli, C.K.; Guedes, A.L.A.; Vazquez, E.G.; Hammad, A.W.A.; Haddad, A.N.; Soares, C.A.P. Smart and Sustainable Cities: The Main Guidelines of City Statute for Increasing the Intelligence of Brazilian Cities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brasil. Ministério das Cidades. Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana Sustentável. Caderno Mcidades Mobilidade Urbana. 2004. Available online: http://www.ta.org.br/site2/Banco/7manuais/6PoliticaNacionalMobilidadeUrbanaSustentavel.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2019).
- Brasil. Lei Federal N° 12.587 de 3 de janeiro de 2012. Dispõem sobre as diretrizes da Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana. 2012. Available online: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2012/Lei/L12587.htm (accessed on 10 December 2019).
- Guedes, A.L.A.; Alvarenga, J.C.; Goulart, M.S.S.; Rodriguez, M.V.R.; Soares, C.A.P. Smart cities: The main drivers for increasing the intelligence of cities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- PMN. Plano Diretor de Niterói—Lei n 1757/92, alterada pela Lei n. 2123 de 2004. Secretaria Municipal de Urbanismo: Niterói, Brasil, 2017. Available online: http://www.urbanismo.niteroi.rj.gov.br (accessed on 12 December 2017).
- PMN. Plano Diretor de Transporte e Trânsito (PDTT): Plano de Trabalho; Secretaria Municipal de Serviços Públicos: Niterói, Brasil, 2005. Available online: https://urbanismo.niteroi.rj.gov.br/bhls-transoceanica/ (accessed on 15 December 2019).
- PMN. BRT TransOceânica—Sistema de Transporte Urbano; Secretaria Municipal de Urbanismo e Mobilidade: Niterói, Brasil, 2013. Available online: https://urbanismo.niteroi.rj.gov.br/bhls-transoceanica/ (accessed on 15 December 2019).
- PMN. Plano Urbanístico da Região Oceânica—Lei n. 1968/2002, alterada pela Lei n. 2113/2003. Secretaria Municipal de Urbanismo: Niterói. Available online: http://www.urbanismo.niterói.rj.gov.br (accessed on 12 December 2017).
- AGRAR. Estudo de Impacto Ambiental das Obras de Implantação do Corredor Viário—TransOceânica; Prefeitura Municipal de Niterói: Niterói, Brasil, 2014; Available online: https://agrar.com.br/projetos/ap-237eiarima-do-corredor-viario-charitas-piratininga-transoceanica/ (accessed on 15 December 2019).
- AGRAR. Corredor Viário TransOceânica. Relatório de Impacto Ambiental; Prefeitura Municipal de Niterói: Niterói, Brasil, 2014; Available online: https://agrar.com.br/projetos/ap-237eiarima-do-corredor-viario-charitas-piratininga-transoceanica/ (accessed on 15 December 2019).
- Sinergia Estudos e Projetos Ltda. BRT TransOceânica: Estudos de Demanda. Relatório Final; Prefeitura Municipal de Niterói: Niterói, Brasil, 2014; pp. 1–2. Available online: http://www.inea.rj.gov.br/cs/groups/public/documents/document/zwew/mdiw/~edisp/inea0020366.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2019).
- Gil, A.C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social; Atlas: São Paulo, Brasil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Alvarenga, J.C.; Branco, R.R.; Valle, A.B.; Soares, C.A.P.; Silva, W.S.E. The project manager core competencies to project success. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2019, 13, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarenga, J.C.; Branco, R.R.; Valle, A.B.; Soares, C.A.P.; Silva, W.S.E. The self-perception of project managers compared to other project actors. Interciencia 2019, 44, 444–453. [Google Scholar]
- Therneau, T.; Atkinson, B.; Ripley, B. rPart: Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees. R Package Version 4.1-11. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart (accessed on 10 December 2019).
- Milborrow, S. rPart.Plot: Plot ‘rPart’ Models: An Enhanced Version of ‘plot.rpart’. R Package Version 3.0.3. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart.plot (accessed on 10 January 2020).
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2017. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 10 December 2019).
- Shukla, N.; Jani, H.J. Social impact assessment of road infrastructure projects. GJCMP 2018, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qtiashat, D.; Makhamreh, Z.; Abu, T.H.; Khlaifat, A. Urban Land Use Pattern and Road Network Characteristics Using GIS in Al Salt City, Jordan. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2018, 12, 128–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Noy, K.; Givoni, M. Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs. Sustainability 2018, 10, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kiba-Janiak, M.; Witkowski, J. Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work? Sustainability 2019, 11, 4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Themes | References |
---|---|
CVT project and relevant legislation | [37]; [39,40]; [42,43,44,45,46,47] |
Infrastructure projects assessment | [2,3,4,5,6,7]; [14]; [18] |
Social impacts of road traffic | [3,4]; [11]; [17,18]; [49]; [50] |
Influence of the road system on the natural and urban landscape and the quality of the habitat | [8,9]; [13]; [16,17]; [19]; [20]; [21,22] |
Influence of the road system on air quality | [4]; [13]; [23,24,25,26,27] |
Influence of the road system and city morphology on noise pollution | [4]; [12]; [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] |
Influence of the road system on population safety | [4]; [10]; [15]; [28]; [30,31,32]; [50,51] |
Influence of the road system on urban mobility | [1]; [15]; [32,33,34,35,36]; [52,53] |
Land use pattern | [8]; [12]; [38]; [53] |
Data analysis | [37,38,39,40,41]; [48]; [54,55,56,57,58] |
Impacts | Scenarios |
---|---|
Changes in the standard of living of the local population: changes in the value of real estate, increase of commercial and service activities and generation of jobs and income. | Positive impact: the improvement of mobility and accessibility conditions will make the region more attractive, generating opportunities for new business and employment, as well as the appreciation of properties, especially those bordering the CVT. |
Change in daily life: changes in the dynamics of the use of public space by the users and their daily routine. | Positive impact: the spatial planning provided by the CVT will make the use of spaces more accessible and improve the coexistence between drivers and cyclists; the reduction in travel times provided by improved mobility will make it possible to carry out new activities. |
Change in air quality: change in the emission dynamics of air pollutants and concentration levels. | Positive impact: the emission of atmospheric pollutants will reach levels lower than the current ones, since the project’s aim is the improvement in urban mobility, encouraging the population to leave their private cars at home and use public transport; with the differentiated BRT concept, the main road and the vehicles connected to the system will enter the boroughs of the Oceanic Region, reducing the need for several bus lines for the same route and the travel time to the town of Niterói and the Charitas borough. |
Change in noise levels: change in the dynamics of noise generation and intensity levels. | Positive impact: reinforcing the effect of improving air quality, the levels of noise and vibration will also be positive, since they originate from the same polluting source, which is mainly the circulation of cars. |
Alteration of the natural landscape: changes in vegetation cover and relief. | Negative impact: the requalification of the roads in the road corridor and the suppression of areas for the implantation of the tunnel and the construction site can bring significant changes from the local landscape’s point of view; in the construction phase, the suppression of vegetation, the movement of soil for the topographical readjustment of the land and the insertion of the temporary infrastructures necessary for the implantation of the enterprise will result in irreversible changes in the local landscape; in the operation phase, the impact in question will occur through the insertion of permanent infrastructures. |
Alteration of the local dynamics and neighborhood disturbance: alterations caused by the attraction of new residents and commercial and service enterprises, and modification of the local dynamics of movement of people and vehicles. | Negative impact: the ease of access and improvements in mobility conditions will cause an increase in the flow of people seeking or crossing the region, which will change the local dynamics of the movement of people and vehicles, impacting the local population. |
Change in mobility in the region: changes in the dynamics and intensity of traffic and in the offer of public transport. | Positive impact: the CVT will have exclusive bus lanes, with connections to the city and intercity bus networks that will operate within the new infrastructure. It will improve the connection between the area under study and the city of Rio de Janeiro through the integration of the CVT with the Waterway Terminal of Charitas. |
Changes in the urban landscape: changes in the landscape as a result of the topographic readjustment of the land and the insertion of the elements that make up the permanent infrastructure, including those regarding its functionality. | Positive impact: the roads through which the system will pass, the adjacent roads and those that will receive the flow of vehicles that will use the tunnel will be revitalized; there will be pavement on the roads to facilitate drainage, bike paths to encourage non-motorized travel, the improvement of existing sidewalks respecting accessibility standards and the elimination of surface parking on the main road to prioritize non-motorized travel in the area. |
Changes in population safety: changes in traffic accident rates. | Negative impact: there may be an increase in accidents due to the increased circulation of vehicles, the new morphology of roads and the encouragement of non-motorized transport, on foot and bicycles; enterprise users will have to get used to new traffic rules and space sharing with multiple users. It should be noted that circulation in the tunnel may also cause accidents with serious consequences for users. |
Demographic issues | Variable |
---|---|
Borough | P1 |
Age | P2 |
Sex | P3 |
Schooling | P4 |
Usage of the CVT | Variable |
Evaluation if the respondent is a CVT user | Xo |
Impacts Foreseen in The Project Planning Phase | Variables Related to The Impact Occurrence (Yes/No) | Variables Related to The Type of Impact (Positive/Negative) |
---|---|---|
Changes in the standard of living of the local population: changes in the value of real estate increase of commercial and service activities and generation of jobs and income. | X1 | X10 |
Change in daily life: changes in the dynamics of the use of public space by users and their daily routine. | X2 | X11 |
Change in air quality: change in the emission dynamics of air pollutants and concentration levels. | X3 | X12 |
Change in noise levels: change in the dynamics of noise generation and intensity levels. | X4 | X13 |
Alteration of the natural landscape: changes in vegetation cover and relief. | X5 | X14 |
Alteration of the local dynamics and neighborhood disturbance: alterations caused by the attraction of new residents and commercial and service enterprises, and modification of the local dynamics of movement of people and vehicles. | X6 | X15 |
Change in mobility in the region: changes in the dynamics and intensity of traffic and in the offer of public transport. | X7 | X16 |
Changes in the urban landscape: changes in the landscape as a result of the topographic readjustment of the land and the insertion of the elements that make up the permanent infrastructure, including those regarding its functionality. | X8 | X17 |
Changes in population safety: changes in traffic accident rates. | X9 | X18 |
For You, Did the Possible Impacts, Mentioned Below, Have Effects on The Area Under Discussion? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Impact | Answers | % | Impact | |
+ | − | |||
X1: Change in the standard of living of the local population | Yes | 88.9 | 74.2 | 14.7 |
No | 11.1 | |||
X2: Change in daily life | Yes | 74.9 | 63.7 | 11.2 |
No | 25.1 | |||
X3: Change of air quality | Yes | 60.0 | 17.7 | 42.3 |
No | 40.0 | |||
X4: Change of noise levels | Yes | 62.9 | 15.5 | 47.4 |
No | 37.1 | |||
X5: Change in the natural landscape | Yes | 77.1 | 41.3 | 35.8 |
No | 22.9 | |||
X6: Alteration of the local dynamics and disturbance of neighborhood | Yes | 87.4 | 63.3 | 24.1 |
No | 12.6 | |||
X7: Change in mobility in the region | Yes | 91.1 | 61.4 | 29.7 |
No | 8.9 | |||
X8: Change in the urban landscape | Yes | 87.4 | 58.7 | 28.7 |
No | 12.6 | |||
X9: Change in population safety | Yes | 66.3 | 19.2 | 47.1 |
Questions | Impact | |
---|---|---|
Predicted Scenario | Survey Result | |
X1: Change in the standard of living of the local population | 🡹 | 🡹 |
X2: Change in daily life | 🡹 | 🡹 |
X3: Change of air quality | 🡹 | 🡻 |
X4: Change of noise levels | 🡹 | 🡻 |
X5: Change in the natural landscape | 🡻 | 🡹 |
X6: Alteration of the local dynamics and disturbance of neighborhood | 🡻 | 🡹 |
X7: Change in mobility in the region | 🡹 | 🡹 |
X8: Change in the urban landscape | 🡹 | 🡹 |
X9: Change in population safety | 🡻 | 🡻 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gomes, J.A.P.; Ferreira Alcoforado, L.; Azevedo Guedes, A.L.; Soares, C.A.P.; Longo, O.C. Perception of the Impacts of Urban Mobility Interventions in the Niterói Oceanic Region, Brazil. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156052
Gomes JAP, Ferreira Alcoforado L, Azevedo Guedes AL, Soares CAP, Longo OC. Perception of the Impacts of Urban Mobility Interventions in the Niterói Oceanic Region, Brazil. Sustainability. 2020; 12(15):6052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156052
Chicago/Turabian StyleGomes, José Augusto Paixão, Luciane Ferreira Alcoforado, André Luis Azevedo Guedes, Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, and Orlando Celso Longo. 2020. "Perception of the Impacts of Urban Mobility Interventions in the Niterói Oceanic Region, Brazil" Sustainability 12, no. 15: 6052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156052
APA StyleGomes, J. A. P., Ferreira Alcoforado, L., Azevedo Guedes, A. L., Soares, C. A. P., & Longo, O. C. (2020). Perception of the Impacts of Urban Mobility Interventions in the Niterói Oceanic Region, Brazil. Sustainability, 12(15), 6052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156052