Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Consumer Behavior towards the Environment—A Study from the UAE
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Is there a significant relationship between eco-labeling (EL) and consumer behavior towards the environment?
- Is there a significant relationship between green packaging and branding (GPB) and consumer behavior towards the environment?
- Is there a significant relationship between green product, premium and pricing (GPPP) and consumer behavior towards the environment?
- Is there a significant relationship between environmental concerns and beliefs (ECB) and consumer beliefs towards the environment (CBTE)?
2. Literature Review
3. Eco-Labeling
4. Green Packaging and Branding (GPB)
5. Green Products, Premium, and Pricing
6. Environmental Concerns and Beliefs (ECB)
7. Research Methodology
8. Empirical Findings
9. Eco-Labeling (EL) and Consumer Belief towards Environment (CBTE)
10. Conclusions and Future Directions
11. Key Limitations and Future Research
- We focused on a limited number of consumers who belong to only one region of the UAE.
- We did not provide any evidence regarding the consideration of businesses dealing with green marketing and related product lines.
- Our findings need to be further validated with a broader analysis for the effectiveness of green marketing and related approaches.
- Due to the lack of a definition for green marketing and related patterns, the present study has covered some pre-limited indicators for green marketing.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
CBTE | Consumer Beliefs towards the Environment |
CFA | Confirmatory Factor Analysis |
ECB | Environmental Concerns and Beliefs |
EL | Eco-Labeling |
GPB | Green Packaging and Branding |
GPPP | Green Products, Premium, and Pricing |
Appendix A
Consumer Beliefs towards the Environment (CBTE) |
---|
1. Use of biodegradable soaps or detergents 2. Avoid buying aerosol products 3. Read labels to see if contents are environmentally safe 4. Buy products made or packaged in recycled materials 5. Buy products in packages that can be refilled 6. Avoid buying products from companies who are environmentally responsible 7. Recycle bottles, cans or glass 8. Consumers taking their own bags to the supermarket 9. Contribute money to environmental causes |
Environmental Concerns and Beliefs (ECB) |
1. The Earth is approaching the limit of the number of people it can support 2. The balance of nature is very delicate and easily upset 3. Humans have the right to modify the natural environment to suit their needs 4. Human interference with nature often has disastrous consequences 5. Plants and animals exist primarily to be used by humans 6. Humans have to control industrial growth to maintain a healthy economy 7. Humans must live in harmony with nature in order to survive 8. Humans need to adapt to the natural environment because they can remake it to suit their own needs 9. There are limits to which the industrialized society can expand 10. Mankind is severely abusing the environment |
Eco-Labeling (EL) |
1. Eco-labels are eye catching on green products 2. Sufficient information is provided on eco-labels 3. I believe that eco-labels are easy to read 4. Green products are marketed to me in a way which I really find engaging and relevant to my lifestyle 5. Information on eco-labels is accurate for green products 6. It is easy for me to identify green products in UAE |
Green Packaging and Branding (GPB) |
1. I acknowledge that the information on packaging is an important criterion 2. It is important to reuse or recycle packaging after use 3. Biodegradable packaging is an important consideration for green customers 4. I feel good about buying brands which are less damaging to the environment 5. I trust well known green branded products in UAE |
Green Products, Premium, and Pricing (GPPP) |
1. I accept as true that a portion of the price for green products goes to a worthy environmental cause 2. I consider that green products are very important in the context of UAE 3. I think that it is reasonable to pay a higher price for products that are produced in an ecological way |
References
- Hasan, Z.; Ali, N.A. The impact of green marketing strategy on the firms performance in Malaysia. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 172, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chan, R.Y.; Lau, L.B. Antecedents of green purchases: A survey in China. J. Consum. Mark. 2000, 17, 338–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulos, I.; Karagouni, G.; Trigkas, M.; Platogianni, E. Green marketing: The case of Greece in certified and sustainably managed timber products. EuroMed J. Bus. 2010, 5, 166–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P. State of green marketing research over 25 years (1990–2014) Literature survey and classification. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2016, 34, 137–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kardos, M.; Gabor, M.R.; Cristache, N. Green marketing’s roles in sustainability and ecopreneurship. Case study: Green packaging’s impact on Romanian young consumers’ environmental responsibility. Sustainability 2019, 11, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hart, O. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Cherian, J.; Jacob, J. Green marketing: A study of consumers’ attitude towards environment friendly products. Asian Soc. Sci. 2012, 8, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Laroche, M.; Bergeron, J.; Barbaro-Forleo, G. Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J. Consum. Mark. 2001, 18, 503–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mostafa, M.M. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2007, 31, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pickett-Baker, J.; Ozaki, R. Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. J. Consum. Mark. 2008, 25, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podvorica, G.; Ukaj, F. The role of consumers’ behaviour in applying green marketing: An economic analysis of the non-alcoholic beverages industry in kosova. Wroclaw Rev. Law Adm. Econ. 2020, 9, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamossy, G.J.; Solomon, M.R. Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Horner, S.; Swarbrooke, J. Consumer Behaviour in Tourism; Routledge: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P. Green marketing innovations in small Indian firms. World J. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 11, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peattie, K. Environmental Marketing Management: Meeting the Green Challenge; Financial Times Management: Upper Sadle River, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Farzin, A.; Yousefi, S.; Amieheidari, S.; Noruzi, A. Effect of green marketing instruments and behavior processes of consumers on purchase and use of e-books. Webology 2020, 17, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polonsky, M.J. An introduction to green marketing. In Global Environment: Problems and Policies; Atlantic Publishers: New Delhi, India, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, B.; Simintiras, A.C. The impact of green product lines on the environment. Mark. Intell. Plan. 1995, 13, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ottman, J. The New Rules of Green Marketing: Strategies, Tools, and Inspiration for Sustainable Branding; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ottman, J.; Books, N.B. Green marketing: Opportunity for innovation. J. Sustain. Prod. Des. 1998, 60, 136–667. [Google Scholar]
- Rasool, Y.; Iftikhar, B.; Nazir, M.N.; Kamran, H.W. Supply chain evolution and green supply chain perspective. Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag. 2016, 4, 716–724. [Google Scholar]
- Salzman, J. Informing the green consumer: The debate over the use and abuse of environmental labels. J. Ind. Ecol. 1997, 1, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandermerwe, S.; Oliff, M.D. Customers drive corporations. Long Range Plan. 1990, 23, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, N. The apparel aftermarket in India—A case study focusing on reverse logistics. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2011, 15, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polonsky, M.J. Green marketing regulation in the US and Australia: The Australian checklist. Greener Manag. Int. 1994, 5, 44–53. [Google Scholar]
- Welford, R. Hijacking Environmentalism: Corporate Responses to Sustainable Development; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Juwaheer, T.D.; Pudaruth, S.; Noyaux, M.M.E. Analysing the impact of green marketing strategies on consumer purchasing patterns in Mauritius. World J. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 8, 36–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadas, K.-K.; Avlonitis, G.J.; Carrigan, M. Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 80, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dangelico, R.M.; Vocalelli, D. “Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 1263–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simon, F.L. Marketing green products in the triad. Columbia J. World Bus. 1992, 27, 268–285. [Google Scholar]
- Cleveland, M.; Kalamas, M.; Laroche, M. Shades of green: Linking environmental locus of control and pro-environmental behaviors. J. Consum. Mark. 2005, 22, 198–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraz, S.B.; Romero, C.B.A.; Laroche, M.; Veloso, A.R. Green products: A cross-cultural study of attitude, intention and purchase behavior. RAM Rev. Adm. Mackenzie 2017, 18, 12–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barber, N. “Green” wine packaging: Targeting environmental consumers. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2010, 22, 423–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prahalad, C.K.; Hamel, G. Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm? Strateg. Manag. J. 1994, 15, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallastegui, I.G. The use of eco-labels: A review of the literature. Eur. Environ. 2002, 12, 316–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Souza, C.; Taghian, M.; Lamb, P. An empirical study on the influence of environmental labels on consumers. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2006, 11, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bhaskaran, S. Incremental innovation and business performance: Small and medium-size food enterprises in a concentrated industry environment. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2006, 44, 64–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.-S.; Hung, S.-T.; Wang, T.-Y.; Huang, A.-F.; Liao, Y.-W. The influence of excessive product packaging on green brand attachment: The mediation roles of green brand attitude and green brand image. Sustainability 2017, 9, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mishra, P.; Jain, T.; Motiani, M. Have green, pay More: An empirical investigation of consumer’s attitude towards green packaging in an emerging economy. In India Studies in Business and Economics; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 125–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.-C.; Zhao, X. Exploring the relationship of green packaging design with consumers’ green trust, and green brand attachment. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 2019, 47, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazur, A. How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010–2012? Public Underst. Sci. 2014, 25, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brécard, D. Consumer misperception of eco-labels, green market structure and welfare. J. Regul. Econ. 2017, 51, 340–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harbaugh, R.; Maxwell, J.W.; Roussillon, B. Label confusion: The Groucho effect of uncertain standards. Manag. Sci. 2011, 57, 1512–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bonroy, O.; Constantatos, C. On the economics of labels: How their introduction affects the functioning of markets and the welfare of all participants. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2014, 97, 239–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fischer, C.; Lyon, T.P. Competing environmental labels. J. Econ. Manag. Strat. 2014, 23, 692–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rochikashvili, M.; Bongaerts, J. How eco-labelling influences environmentally conscious consumption of construction products. Sustainability 2018, 10, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Amacher, G.S.; Koskela, E.; Ollikainen, M. Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2004, 47, 284–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Horne, R. Limits to labels: The role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2009, 33, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swenson, M.R.; Wells, W.D. Useful Correlates of Pro-Environmental Behavior. In Social Marketing: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives; Goldberg, M.E., Fishbein, M., Middlestadt, S.E., Eds.; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2018; pp. 91–109. [Google Scholar]
- Hartmann, P.; Ibáñez, V.A.; Sainz, F.J.F. Green branding effects on attitude: Functional versus emotional positioning strategies. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2005, 23, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meffert, H.; Kirchgeorg, M. Das neue leitbild sustainable development: Der weg ist das ziel. Harv. Bus. Manag. 1993, 15, 34–45. [Google Scholar]
- Wüstenhagen, R.; Bilharz, M. Green energy market development in Germany: Effective public policy and emerging customer demand. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 1681–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Swezey, B.G.; Bird, L. Utility Green Pricing Programs: What Defines Success? National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.J.; Sheu, J.-B. Environmental-regulation pricing strategies for green supply chain management. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2009, 45, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bae, J.H.; Rishi, M. Increasing consumer participation rates for green pricing programs: A choice experiment for South Korea. Energy Econ. 2018, 74, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arbuthnot, J. The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge. Environ. Behav. 1977, 9, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleveland, M.; Bartikowski, B. Cultural and identity antecedents of market mavenism: Comparing Chinese at home and abroad. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 82, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoyer, W.; MacInnis, D. Consumer Behavior, 3rd ed.; CENGAGE: Boston, MA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Sloan, A. Top 10 Functional Food Trends. Food Technol. 2004, 58, 28–51. [Google Scholar]
- Hooper, D.; Coughlan, J.; Mullen, M.R. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 2008, 6, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
- Steiger, J.H. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2007, 42, 893–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentler, P.M.; Bonett, D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 1980, 88, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alansaari, A.; El Sergany, M. Assessment of Public Purchase Behavior Towards Household Green Products in United Arab Emirates (UAE). In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Rhodes, Greece, 4–7 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Alomari, B.M.A.; Alomari, I.A.A. Green marketing and its impact on consumer purchasing behavior and the tourism sector/an analytical study—The Jordanian green market. J. Econ. Bus. Market Res. 2020, 1, 8–24. [Google Scholar]
- Dubey, A.R. Study of factors of green loyalty in context of green products and services: Mediation evidences of green trust of customers of hotel chains in UAE. J. Asian Bus. Manag. 2018, 10, 87–100. [Google Scholar]
Indices | Result | Decision |
---|---|---|
Chi-square | 344.798 | Accepted |
Root mean squared error approximation (RMSEA) | 0.054 | Accepted |
GFI | 0.907 | Accepted |
Adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) | 0.881 | Accepted |
Comparative fit index (CFI) | 0.904 | Accepted |
Tucker Lewis index (TLI) | 0.899 | Accepted |
Variables and Items | Directions | Variables and Items | Estimate | SE | CR | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBTE | <--- | EL | 0.40 | 0.16 | 2.39 | 0.017 ** |
CBTE | <--- | GPPP | 0.41 | 0.08 | 5.02 | *** |
CBTE | <--- | ECB | 0.64 | 0.09 | 7.12 | *** |
CBTE | <--- | GPB | −0.24 | 0.16 | −1.50 | 0.132 |
EL2 | <--- | EL | 1.00 | |||
EL3 | <--- | EL | 0.88 | 0.15 | 5.67 | *** |
EL4 | <--- | EL | 1.26 | 0.17 | 7.05 | *** |
EL5 | <--- | EL | 1.04 | 0.16 | 6.21 | *** |
GPB5 | <--- | GPB | 1.00 | |||
GPB4 | <--- | GPB | 1.15 | 0.14 | 8.18 | *** |
GPB3 | <--- | GPB | 0.75 | 0.11 | 6.46 | *** |
GPB2 | <--- | GPB | 1.11 | 0.13 | 8.38 | *** |
GPB1 | <--- | GPB | 0.97 | 0.13 | 7.47 | *** |
GPPP5 | <--- | GPPP | 1.00 | |||
GPPP4 | <--- | GPPP | 1.06 | 0.14 | 7.57 | *** |
GPPP3 | <--- | GPPP | 0.96 | 0.13 | 6.98 | *** |
GPPP2 | <--- | GPPP | 1.01 | 0.13 | 7.43 | *** |
GPPP1 | <--- | GPPP | 0.84 | 0.13 | 6.30 | *** |
ECB5 | <--- | ECB | 1.00 | |||
ECB4 | <--- | ECB | 1.12 | 0.09 | 11.93 | *** |
ECB3 | <--- | ECB | 1.32 | 0.10 | 12.57 | *** |
ECB2 | <--- | ECB | 1.24 | 0.09 | 12.65 | *** |
ECB1 | <--- | ECB | 1.15 | 0.09 | 11.68 | *** |
EL1 | <--- | EL | 1.12 | 0.16 | 6.82 | *** |
CBTE2 | <--- | CBTE | 1.10 | 0.13 | 8.37 | *** |
CBTE5 | <--- | CBTE | 0.25 | 0.09 | 2.69 | 0.007 ** |
CBTE3 | <--- | CBTE | 1.08 | 0.13 | 8.10 | *** |
CBTE4 | <--- | CBTE | 0.53 | 0.09 | 5.88 | *** |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shabbir, M.S.; Bait Ali Sulaiman, M.A.; Hasan Al-Kumaim, N.; Mahmood, A.; Abbas, M. Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Consumer Behavior towards the Environment—A Study from the UAE. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8977. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218977
Shabbir MS, Bait Ali Sulaiman MA, Hasan Al-Kumaim N, Mahmood A, Abbas M. Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Consumer Behavior towards the Environment—A Study from the UAE. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21):8977. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218977
Chicago/Turabian StyleShabbir, Muhammad Salman, Mohammed Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman, Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim, Arshad Mahmood, and Mazhar Abbas. 2020. "Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Consumer Behavior towards the Environment—A Study from the UAE" Sustainability 12, no. 21: 8977. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218977
APA StyleShabbir, M. S., Bait Ali Sulaiman, M. A., Hasan Al-Kumaim, N., Mahmood, A., & Abbas, M. (2020). Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Consumer Behavior towards the Environment—A Study from the UAE. Sustainability, 12(21), 8977. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218977