Multi-Scale Minero-Chemical Analysis of Biomass Ashes: A Key to Evaluating Their Dangers vs. Benefits
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Samples
2.2. Experimental Thecniques
2.2.1. XRPD Analyses
2.2.2. TGA and DTA
2.2.3. SEM Analyses
2.2.4. Granulometric Analysis
2.2.5. EMPA and LA-ICP-MS Analyses
2.2.6. PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
3. Results
3.1. Granulometric Results
3.2. X-ray Diffraction Results
3.3. Thermal Analysis Results
3.4. Electron Microscopy Results
3.5. Chemical Composition Results
4. Discussion
- The PTE concentrations were evaluated for the potential human and ecological risks, since their accumulation increases the toxic hazard [29,30]. In all of the samples of fly ashes from biomasses, the PTE concentrations analyzed were below the limits indicated in Italian legislation. Moreover, the PAH content was undetectable for all samples with the exception of sample 1, which was a unique sample coming from a gasification plant.
- Gasification is a process that converts either biomass [31] or fossil fuel-based carbonaceous materials into gases. The process consists of the reaction of the feedstock material, at high temperatures (typically > 700 °C) without combustion, via control of the amount of oxygen and/or steam present in the reaction. The resulting gas mixture is called syngas (from synthesis gas) or producer gas and its largest fraction is composed of nitrogen (N2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen (H2), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Due to the flammability properties of the H2 and CO, syngas is itself a fuel. The thermal analysis performed in this work showed a strong weight loss, more than 50 wt%, at approximately 400 °C for sample 1. Indeed, during the process some material remained un-combusted, likely due to the large amount of PAH content in that sample.
- The granulometric analysis indicated that the PM2.5 fraction, namely the amount of particles with average dimensions below 2.5 μm, which can represent a danger to human health due to their potential of being inhaled, was significantly lower than 1%; the amount of particles with diameters less than 10 μm was quite different, varying from 5% in sample 5 to 40% in sample 4.
- The high phosphorous content, as an apatite mineral, as well potassium content, as a sylvite mineral, suggests that these materials may represent good amendments for agricultural lands once the bioavailability of these elements is proved and verified. The electron microscopy analysis showed that the crystals usually have very small dimensions, from the nanometer scale to a few microns. Moreover, the Rietveld analysis indicated that the amorphous content in all samples was very high, ranging from 47.6 wt% in sample 1 up to 84.7 wt% in sample 5. Both the above-mentioned characteristics are good indicators of a large reaction surface, one the most important parameters for bioavailability.
- The high Ca content revealed by the chemical analysis did not have a counterpart in the mineralogical composition of the samples, as relevant amounts of Ca minerals were not observed in the XRPD data processing. Thus, the high Ca content is supposedly stored in the amorphous phase, which was quite abundant in the studied fly ashes.
- The high Ca content measured in the samples suggests that these materials can be used as amendments in soils, usually clayey soils, with low geotechnical properties. In these soils, the traditional addition of CaO, coming from the decarbonation reaction of carbonate minerals, improves the mechanical properties as pozzolanic reactions induced by the highly alkaline environment promote the formation of new binding compounds such as calcium silicate hydrate minerals (C-A-H; C-S-H) [32,33,34]. In a high pH environment, natural pozzolanas, rich in silicon and amorphous phase, promote pozzolanic reactions as they increase the availability of silicon and alumina [35]. The large amount of amorphous content, evidenced by the Rietveld analysis, and the chemical compositions of the analyzed ash samples suggest that at least some of them could be successfully used in combination with or as substitutions for traditional binders in soil stabilization. Such use would require the environment to reach the alkalinity needed to promote pozzolanic reactions, with or without the addition of alkaline activators, which are normally used for soil treatment by means of fly ashes [35].
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Torquati, B.; Marino, D.; Venanzi, S.; Porceddu, P.; Chiorri, M. Using tree crop pruning residues for energy purposes: A spatial analysis and an evaluation of the economic and environmental sustainability. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 95, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, A.K.; Thring, R.W.; Helle, S.; Ghuman, H.S. Ash Management Review—Applications of Biomass Bottom Ash. Energies 2012, 5, 3856–3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalaglio, G.; Cotana, F.; Nicolini, A.; Coccia, V.; Petrozzi, A.; Formica, A.; Bertini, A. Characterization of Various Biomass Feedstock Suitable for Small-Scale Energy Plants as Preliminary Activity of Biocheaper Project. Sustainibility 2020, 12, 6678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michalik, M.; Wilczynska-Michalik, W. Mineral and chemical composition of biomass ash. In Proceedings of the European Mineralogical Conference, Frankfurt, Germany, 2–6 September 2012; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Kalembkiewicz, J.; Galas, D.; Sitarz-Palczak, E. The Physicochemical Properties and Composition of Biomass Ash and Evaluating Directions of its Applications. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 2593–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zając, G.; Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J.; Gołębiowski, W.; Szczepanik, M. Chemical Characteristics of Biomass Ashes. Energies 2018, 11, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Obenberger, L.; Supancic, K. Possibilities of ash utilization from biomass combustion plants. In Proceedings of the 17th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Hamburg, Germany, 29 June–3 July 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Carević, I.; Štirmer, N.; Trkmić, M.; Kostanić Jurić, K. Leaching Characteristics of Wood Biomass Fly Ash Cement Composites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Baxter, L. Comprehensive study of biomass fly ash in concrete: Strength, microscopy, kinetics and durability. Fuel Process. Technol. 2007, 88, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvo, M.; Rizzo, S.; Caldirola, M.; Novajra, G.; Canonico, F.; Bianchi, M.; Ferraris, M. Biomass ash as supplementary cementitious material (SCM). Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2015, 114, S3–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cabrera, M.; Díaz-López, J.L.; Agrela, F.; Rosales, J. Eco-Efficient Cement-Based Materials Using Biomass Bottom Ash: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajamma, R.; Ball, R.J.; Tarelho, L.A.C.; Allen, G.C.; Labrincha, J.A.; Ferreira, V.M. Characterization and use of bio-mass fly ash in cement-based materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Gong, K. Silicon-Based Materials from Rice Husks and Their Applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 5861–5877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltani, N.; Bahrami, A.; Pech-Canul, M.I.; González, L.A. Review on the physicochemical treatments of rice husk for production of advanced materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 264, 899–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirbaş, A. Heavy metal contents of fly ashes from selected biomass samples. Energy Sources 2005, 27, 1269–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boström, C.E.; Gerde, P.; Hanberg, A.; Jemstrom, B.; Johansson, C.; Kyrkslund, T.; Ranung, A.; Tomqvist, M.; Victorin, K.; Westerholm, R. Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocar-bons in the ambient. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 451–488. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Baird, W.M.; Hooven, L.A.; Mahdevan, B. Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and mechanism of action. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2005, 2–3, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haykırı-Açma, H. Combustion characteristics of different biomass materials. Energy Convers. Manag. 2003, 44, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J.; He, Y.; Yu, X.; Banks, S.W.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Y.; Liu, R.; Bridgwater, A.V. Review of physicochemical properties and analytical characterization of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hasler, P.; Nussbaumer, T. Particle size distribution of the fly ash from biomass combustion. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference and Technology Exhibition Biomass for Energy and Industry, Wurzburg, Germany, 8–11 June 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Rietveld, H.M. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 1969, 2, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, A.C.; Von Dreele, R.B. Generalized Structure Analysis System (GSAS) LANSCE, MS-H805; Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2000; p. 87545. [Google Scholar]
- Toby, B.H. EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gentili, S.; Comodi, P.; Nazzareni, S.; Zucchini, A. The orvieto-Bagnoregio ignimbrite: Pyroxene crystalchemistry and bulk pahse composition of pyroclastic deposits, a tool to identify sym and post-depositional processes. Eur. J. Mineral. 2014, 26, 743–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrelli, M.; Morgavi, D.; Vetere, F.; Perugini, D. Elemental Imaging and Petro-Volcanological Applications of an Improved Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Quadrupole Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Period. Mineral. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balic-Zunic, T.; Birkedal, R.; Katerinopoulou, A.; Comodi, P. Dehydration of bloedite, Na2Mg(SO4)2(H2O)4 and leonite K2Mg(SO4)2(H2O)4. Eur. J. Mineral. 2016, 28, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frondini, F.; Zucchini, A.; Comodi, P. Water-rock interaction and trace elements distribution in dolomite aquifers: The Sassolungo and Sella system (Northern Italy). Geochem. J. 2014, 48, 231–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saddique, U.; Muhammad, S.; Tariq, M.; Zhang, H.; Arif, M.; Isthtiaq, A.K.; Khattak, N.U. Potentially toxic elements in soil of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province and Tribal areas, Pakistan: Evaluation for human and ecological risk. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 2177–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palansooriya, K.N.; Shaheen, M.S.; Chen, S.S.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Hashimoto, Y.; Hou, D.; Bolan, N.S.; Rinklebe, J.; Ok, Y.S. Soil amendments for immobilization of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soils: A critical review. Environ. Int. 2020, 134, 105046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ur Rehman, I.; Ishaq, M.; Ali, L.; Muhammad, S.; Ud Din, I.; Yaseen, M.; Ullah, H. Potentially toxic elements’ occurrence and risk assessment through water and soil of Chitral urban environment, Pakistan: A case study. Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 4355–4368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schulzke, T. Biomass gasification: Conversion of forest residues into heat, electricity and base chemicals. Chem. Pap. 2019, 73, 1833–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, F.G. Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Eng. Geol. 1996, 42, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mukhtar, M.; Lasledj, A.; Alcover, J.F. Behaviour and mineralogy changes in lime-treated expansive soil at 20 °C. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guidobaldi, G.; Cambi, C.; Cecconi, M.; Comodi, P.; Deneele, D.; Paris, M.; Russo, G.; Vitale, E.; Zucchini, A. Chemo-Mineralogical evolution and microstructural modifications of a lime treated pyroclastic soil. Eng. Geol. 2018, 245, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitale, E.; Russo, G.; Dell’Agli, G.; Ferone, C.; Bartolomeo, C. Mechanical behaviour of soil improved by alkali activated binders. Environments 2017, 4, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rowe, E.; Withers, A.J.; Baas, P.; Chan, N.; Doody, D.; Holiman, J.; Jacobs, B.; Li, H.; MacDonald, G.K.; McDowell, R.; et al. Integrating legacy soil phosphorus into sustainable nutrient management strategies for future food, bioenergy and water security. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 2016, 104, 393–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Code | Name/Type | Origin |
---|---|---|
#1 | Sample 1 biomass ashes | Gasification power plant, Magione (PG), Italy |
#2 | Sample 2 biomass ashes | Grapevine prunings, Torgiano (PG), Italy |
#3 | Sample 3 biomass ashes | Wood pellets |
#4 | Sample 4 biomass ashes | Olive tree prunings |
#5 | Sample 5 biomass ashes | Cardoon plants |
Sample | Phases | Chemical Formula | wt% | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | Quartz | SiO2 | 2.91 | 0.01 |
Calcite | CaCO3 | 21.01 | 0.07 | |
Portlandite | CaO(OH)2 | 4.47 | 0.05 | |
Sulphur | S | 0.41 | 0.02 | |
Hydroxylapatite | Ca5(PO4)3(OH) | 3.11 | 0.02 | |
Amorphous | 68.1 | 0.1 | ||
#2 | Periclase | MgO | 1.81 | 0.01 |
Calcite | CaCO3 | 8.34 | 0.04 | |
Heulandite | (Ca.Na)2–3Al3(Al.Si)2Si13O36·12(H2O) | 1.15 | 0.03 | |
Calcioferrite | Ca4Fe2+(Fe3+.Al)4(PO4)6(OH)4·12(H2O) | 1.60 | 0.02 | |
Fairchildite | K2Ca(CO3)2 | 2.23 | 0.01 | |
Quartz | SiO2 | 0.33 | 0.11 | |
Hydroxylapatite | Ca5(PO4)3(OH) | 5.08 | 0.21 | |
Amorphous | 79.5 | 0.2 | ||
#3 | Periclase | MgO | 5.77 | 0.02 |
Calcite | CaCO3 | 6.36 | 0.05 | |
Portlandite | Ca(OH)2 | 0.63 | 0.04 | |
Lime | CaO | 2.06 | 0.02 | |
Fairchildite | K2Ca(CO3)2 | 11.20 | 0.03 | |
Quartz | SiO2 | 0.52 | 0.14 | |
Apatite | Ca5(PO4)3(OH.F.Cl) | 1.39 | 0.26 | |
Amorphous | 72.1 | 0.3 | ||
#4 | Reichenbachite | Cu2+5(PO4)2(OH)4 | 0.95 | 0.02 |
Calcite | CaCO3 | 42.24 | 0.15 | |
Quartz | SiO2 | 4.18 | 0.07 | |
Phosphoferrite | (Fe2+.Mn)3(PO4)2·3(H2O) | 0.42 | 0.03 | |
Hydrossilapatite | Ca5(PO4)3(OH) | 4.57 | 0.03 | |
Amorphous | 47.6 | 0.5 | ||
#5 | Lime | CaO | 0.08 | 0.01 |
Calcite | CaCO3 | 6.62 | 0.03 | |
Fluellite | Al2(PO4)F2(OH)·7(H2O) | 3.48 | 0.03 | |
Sylvite | KCl | 2.99 | 0.01 | |
Quartz | SiO2 | 0.28 | 0.01 | |
Rhodochrosite | MnCO3 | 0.51 | 0.09 | |
Rutile | TiO2 | 0.16 | 0.18 | |
Hydroxilapatite | Ca5(PO4)3(OH) | 1.13 | 0.26 | |
Amorphous | 84.7 | 0.3 |
Sample | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NaO | 0.08 | 0.94 | 0.112 | 0.582 | 0.907 |
Cl | 0.30 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.008 |
MnO | 0.146 | 0.127 | 1.113 | 0.121 | 0.025 |
K2O | 0.184 | 1.78 | 0.005 | 4.944 | 0.008 |
MgO | 0.213 | 9.143 | 32.39 | 3.854 | 1.563 |
SiO2 | 11.76 | 26.19 | 16.512 | 27.949 | 9.567 |
Cr2O3 | 0.136 | 0.0186 | 0.007 | 0.014 | 0.007 |
FeO | 0.611 | 2.34 | 2.765 | 2.889 | 0.537 |
CaO | 39.84 | 44.26 | 37.215 | 43.31 | 65.042 |
Al2O3 | 0.55 | 5.52 | 5.540 | 7.907 | 1.103 |
P2O5 | 0.392 | 8.856 | 3.508 | 7.832 | 7.677 |
TiO2 | 0.067 | 0.318 | 0.202 | 0.349 | 0.084 |
Total | 54.28 | 99.515 | 99.375 | 99.760 | 86.53 |
Sample | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
V | 33.44 | 32.07 | 54.08 | 7.08 |
Cr | 0.13 | 43.44 | 0.13 | 13.55 |
Co | 8.38 | 22.92 | 8.44 | 3.09 |
Ni | 59.40 | 191.00 | 51.30 | 22.18 |
Zn | 479.20 | 85.20 | 114.96 | 51.30 |
Pb | 0.22 | 0.53 | 0.13 | 0.52 |
Cu | 304.62 | 17.36 | 153.38 | 7.85 |
As | 0.25 | 3.05 | 0.51 | 2.21 |
Cd | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.71 |
Hg | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Se | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
Mo | 0.59 | 184.37 | 0.23 | 37.28 |
Cl | 117.40 | 159.33 | 97.20 | 147.80 |
S | 498.63 | 573.00 | 314.50 | 382.00 |
PAH Type/Samples | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total IPA | 1088 | <0.050 | <0.050 | <0.050 | <0.050 |
Naftalene | 3706 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Acenaftene | 4.6 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Acenaftilene | 341 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Fluorene | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Fenantrene | 29 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Antracene | 4.0 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Fluorantene | 1.6 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Pirene | 1.3 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Benzo(a)antracene | 0.015 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Crysene | 0.020 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Benzo(b,k,j)fluorantene | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Benzo(e)pirene | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Benzo(a)pirene | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Indenopirene | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Dibenzo(a,h)antracene | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Benzo(g,h,i)perilene | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 | <0.010 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Comodi, P.; Zucchini, A.; Susta, U.; Cambi, C.; Vivani, R.; Cavalaglio, G.; Cotana, F. Multi-Scale Minero-Chemical Analysis of Biomass Ashes: A Key to Evaluating Their Dangers vs. Benefits. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116052
Comodi P, Zucchini A, Susta U, Cambi C, Vivani R, Cavalaglio G, Cotana F. Multi-Scale Minero-Chemical Analysis of Biomass Ashes: A Key to Evaluating Their Dangers vs. Benefits. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):6052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116052
Chicago/Turabian StyleComodi, Paola, Azzurra Zucchini, Umberto Susta, Costanza Cambi, Riccardo Vivani, Gianluca Cavalaglio, and Franco Cotana. 2021. "Multi-Scale Minero-Chemical Analysis of Biomass Ashes: A Key to Evaluating Their Dangers vs. Benefits" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 6052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116052
APA StyleComodi, P., Zucchini, A., Susta, U., Cambi, C., Vivani, R., Cavalaglio, G., & Cotana, F. (2021). Multi-Scale Minero-Chemical Analysis of Biomass Ashes: A Key to Evaluating Their Dangers vs. Benefits. Sustainability, 13(11), 6052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116052