Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Consumer Trust and Online Grocery Purchase Intention
2.2. Perceived Risk and Online Grocery Purchase Intention
2.3. Consumer Technology Acceptance, Perceived Risk, Trust and Online Grocery Purchase Intention
2.4. Objectives and Research Methodology of the Study
- To identify the factors of customers acceptance of technology in adaption of online grocery purchasing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- To access the factors of consumer technology acceptance and its influence on online grocery purchasing.
- To analyze the role of consumer trust and the perceived risk associated with online purchasing of grocery items and the relationship between consumer acceptance of online technology and purchasing intentions for grocery items.
3. Results
3.1. Regression Analysis
3.2. Mediation Analysis
3.3. Consumer Perceived Risk and Consumer Online Grocery Purchase Intention
3.4. Consumer Trust and Consumer Online Grocery Purchase Intention
4. Discussion
5. Implications and Conclusions
6. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hamadneh, N.N.; Khan, W.A.; Ashraf, W.; Atawneh, S.H.; Khan, I.; Hamadneh, B.N. Artificial neural networks for prediction of covid-19 in Saudi Arabia. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2021, 66, 2787–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Waisy, A.S.; Mohammed, M.A.; Al-Fahdawi, S.; Maashi, M.S.; Garcia-Zapirain, B.; Abdulkareem, K.H.; Mostafa, S.A.; Kumar, N.M.; Le, D.N. Covid-deepnet: Hybrid multimodal deep learning system for improving covid-19 pneumonia detection in chest x-ray images. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2021, 67, 2409–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kala, D. ‘Thank you, God. You saved us’-examining tourists’ intention to visit religious destinations in the post COVID. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, D.; Roggeveen, A.L.; Nordfält, J. The future of retailing. J. Retail. 2017, 93, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, E.; Libaque-Saenz, C.F.; Park, M.-C. Understanding shopping routes of offline purchasers: Selection of search-channels (online vs. offline) and search-platforms (mobile vs. PC) based on product types. Serv. Bus. 2019, 13, 305–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jocevski, M.; Arvidsson, N.; Miragliotta, G.; Ghezzi, A.; Mangiaracina, R. Transitions towards omni-channel retailing strategies: A business model perspective. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2019, 47, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Violante, M.G.; Vezzetti, E.; Piazzolla, P. How to design a virtual reality experience that impacts the consumer engagement: The case of the virtual supermarket. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2019, 13, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Esch, P.; Arli, D.; Gheshlaghi, M.H.; Andonopoulos, V.; von der Heidt, T.; Northey, G. Anthropomorphism and augmented reality in the retail environment. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 49, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flanc, J.-B. Valuation of Internet Start-Ups: An Applied Research on How Venture Capitalists Value Internet Start-Ups; Anchor Academic Publishing: Hamburg, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Fleisher, C.S.; Bensoussan, B.E. Business and Competitive Analysis: Effective Application of New and Classic Methods; FT Press: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Vos, A.; Marinagi, C.; Trivellas, P.; Eberhagen, N.; Skourlas, C.; Giannakopoulos, G. Risk reduction strategies in online shopping: E-trust perspective. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 147, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muslikhin, M.; Horng, J.-R.; Yang, S.-Y.; Wang, M.-S.; Awaluddin, B.-A. An Artificial Intelligence of Things-Based Picking Algorithm for Online Shop in the Society 5.0′s Context. Sensors 2021, 21, 2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, J.C.Y.; Malhotra, N.K.; Alpert, F. A two-dimensional model of trust–value–loyalty in service relationships. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 26, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ba, S.; Pavlou, P.A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Q. 2002, 26, 243–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bourlakis, M.; Papagiannidis, S.; Fox, H. E-consumer behaviour: Past, present and future trajectories of an evolving retail revolution. Int. J. E-Bus. Res. 2008, 4, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drennan, J.; Sullivan, G.; Previte, J. Privacy, risk perception, and expert online behavior: An exploratory study of household end users. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2006, 18, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andrews, L.; Boyle, M.V. Consumers’ accounts of perceived risk online and the influence of communication sources. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 2008, 11, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forsythe, S.; Liu, C.; Shannon, D.; Gardner, L.C. Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. J. Interact. Mark. 2006, 20, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pires, G.; Stanton, J.; Eckford, A. Influences on the perceived risk of purchasing online. J. Consum. Behav. Int. Res. Rev. 2004, 4, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerber, C.; Ward, S.; Goedhals-Gerber, L. The impact of perceived risk on on-line purchase behaviour. Risk Gov. Control Financ. Mark. Inst. 2014, 4, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pentz, C.D.; du Preez, R.; Swiegers, L. To bu (Y) or not to bu (Y): Perceived risk barriers to online shopping among South African generation Y consumers. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2020, 7, 1827813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, V.K.; Do Thi, T.H.; Ha Le, T.H. A study on the COVID-19 awareness affecting the consumer perceived benefits of online shopping in Vietnam. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2020, 7, 1846882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascual-Miguel, F.J.; Agudo-Peregrina, Á.F.; Chaparro-Peláez, J. Influences of gender and product type on online purchasing. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1550–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingham, J.; Cadieux, J.; Berrada, A.M. e-Shopping acceptance: A qualitative and meta-analytic review. Inf. Manag. 2015, 52, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T. Understanding online community user participation: A social influence perspective. Internet Res. 2011, 21, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Graf-Vlachy, L.; Buhtz, K. Social influence in technology adoption research: A literature review and research agenda. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, 5–10 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.K.; Shi, N.; Cheung, C.M.; Lim, K.H.; Sia, C.L. Consumer’s decision to shop online: The moderating role of positive informational social influence. Inf. Manag. 2011, 48, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mandilas, A.; Karasavvoglou, A.; Nikolaidis, M.; Tsourgiannis, L. Predicting consumer’s perceptions in on-line shopping. Procedia Technol. 2013, 8, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.; Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Durodolu, O.O. Technology acceptance model as a predictor of using information system’to acquire information literacy skills. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2016, 1450. [Google Scholar]
- Chau, A.; Stephens, G.; Jamieson, R. Biometrics Acceptance-Perceptions of Use of Biometrics. ACIS 2004 Proceedings. 2004. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1147&context=acis2004 (accessed on 3 September 2021).
- Ho, G.; Stephens, G.; Jamieson, R. Biometric Authentication Adoption Issues. ACIS 2003 Proceedings. 2003. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1319&context=acis2003 (accessed on 3 September 2021).
- Alalwan, A.A.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Williams, M.D. Customers’ intention and adoption of telebanking in Jordan. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2016, 33, 154–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Williams, M.D.; Weerakkody, V. Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Inf. Syst. Front. 2015, 17, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Habib, S.; Hamadneh, N.N.; Al wadi, S.; Masadeh, R. Computation analysis of brand experience dimensions: Indian online food delivery platforms. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2021, 67, 445–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habib, S.; Hamadneh, N.N.; Alsubie, A. Modeling Advertising Practices for Product Involvement and Consumer Impulsivity in Branded Apparel: A Case Study of Indian Consumers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-López, F.J.; Pla-García, C.; Gázquez-Abad, J.C.; Rodríguez-Ardura, I. Hedonic motivations in online consumption behaviour. Int. J. Bus. Environ. 2016, 8, 121–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianchi, C.; Andrews, L. Risk, trust, and consumer online purchasing behaviour: A Chilean perspective. Int. Mark. Rev. 2012, 29, 253–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Juaneda-Ayensa, E.; Mosquera, A.; Sierra Murillo, Y. Omnichannel customer behavior: Key drivers of technology acceptance and use and their effects on purchase intention. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nagy, S.; Hajdú, N. Consumer Acceptance of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Online Shopping: Evidence from Hungary. Amfiteatru Econ. 2021, 23, 155–173. [Google Scholar]
- Schepman, A.; Rodway, P. Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2020, 1, 100014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.-W.; Chan, H.C.; Gupta, S. Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decis. Support Syst. 2007, 43, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Chong, T.W.; Krilavičius, T.; Man, K.L. Perceived Benefits, Risks and Trust on Online Shopping Festival; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 225–235. [Google Scholar]
- Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D.W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 51–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.Z.; Cheung, C.M.; Lee, M.K. Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers’ online shopping decision. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2014, 34, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, J.; Wen, C.; George, B.; Prybutok, V.R. Consumer heterogeneity, perceived value, and repurchase decision-making in online shopping: The role of gender, age, and shopping motives. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2016, 17, 116. [Google Scholar]
Demographic Characteristics | F | % | Demographic Characteristics | F | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Up to 20 Years | 84 | 19.0 | Occupation | Student | 193 | 43.6 |
21–30 Years | 148 | 33.4 | Business | 57 | 12.9 | ||
31–40 Years | 115 | 26.0 | Salaried | 142 | 32.1 | ||
41–50 Years | 50 | 11.3 | Professionals | 33 | 7.4 | ||
51 Years & above | 46 | 10.4 | Housewives’ | 18 | 4.1 | ||
Gender | Male | 312 | 70.4 | Marital Status | Unmarried | 253 | 57.1 |
Female | 131 | 29.6 | Married | 190 | 42.9 | ||
Education | Less than Graduation | 111 | 25.1 | Monthly Income (in INR) * | Less than 25,000 | 94 | 21.2 |
Graduation | 171 | 38.6 | 25,001–50,000 | 146 | 33.0 | ||
Post-Graduation | 93 | 21.0 | 50,001–75,000 | 123 | 27.8 | ||
Professional | 68 | 15.3 | 75,001–100,000 | 56 | 12.6 | ||
Above 100,000 | 24 | 5.4 |
Items and Constructs | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|
Consumer Acceptance of Technology | 3.84 | 0.490 |
Social Influence (α = 0.765) | 3.83 | 0.690 |
People who are important to me think that I should purchase grocery online. | 3.77 | 0.912 |
People who influence my behavior think that I should purchase grocery online. | 3.97 | 0.830 |
People whose opinions that I value prefer that I purchase grocery online. | 3.84 | 0.910 |
People who influence my behavior think that I should purchase grocery online. | 3.76 | 0.948 |
Effort Expectancy (α = 0.745) | 3.77 | 0.694 |
My interaction with online grocery platforms is clear and understandable. | 3.70 | 0.916 |
It is easy for me to become skillful at online grocery purchase platform. | 3.65 | 0.916 |
I do not need high effort to use online platforms to purchase grocery. | 3.86 | 0.975 |
I believe that learning how to use digital technology apps for online shopping grocery items is easy for me. | 3.86 | 0.881 |
Performance Expectancy (α = 0.736) | 3.82 | 0.700 |
I find online grocery platforms useful. | 3.87 | 0.896 |
Purchasing grocery online saves my time and enhances my productivity. | 3.88 | 0.994 |
Online platforms help me in meeting grocery requirements. | 3.71 | 0.960 |
I believe that online platforms helps me in exploring new grocery options. | 3.82 | 0.898 |
Facilitating Condition (α = 0.714) | 3.86 | 0.628 |
I have the necessary resources necessary for shopping grocery online. | 3.81 | 0.871 |
A required skill and resources is available for assistance while facing difficulties in using online grocery shopping. | 3.82 | 0.948 |
I believe that I am provided with necessary IT resources needed to purchase grocery online. | 3.74 | 1.024 |
I believe that I have the necessary knowledge to use software. | 3.93 | 0.921 |
I feel comfortable in using online system for grocery purchase. | 4.01 | 0.820 |
Hedonic Motivation (α = 0.679) | 3.90 | 0.553 |
Adapting online shopping of grocery items gives me a pleasing feeling. | 3.92 | 0.764 |
I feel that online grocery shopping is fun. | 4.00 | 0.818 |
I feel adapting online grocery shopping is enjoyable. | 3.86 | 0.746 |
I find online grocery purchase is very interesting and enjoyable. | 3.81 | 0.771 |
Item and Construct | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|
Perceived Risk (α = 0.824) | 3.85 | 0.607 |
There is chance of change in the demanded specific products. | 3.83 | 0.844 |
I feel safe making grocery purchases online. | 3.80 | 0.840 |
I feel my disclosed personal information while online grocery purchase are safe. | 3.92 | 0.964 |
Online price offer of grocery products reasonable. | 3.78 | 0.969 |
Product delivery as promised are done in time. | 3.90 | 0.676 |
I feel my banking detail given during online transaction are safe. | 3.86 | 0.643 |
Consumer Trust (α = 0.867) | 3.62 | 0.638 |
I have positive attitude towards internet uses in online shopping. | 3.56 | 0.763 |
I am familiar and having trust in the vender engaged in online grocery service providers. | 3.58 | 0.790 |
I trust that vendor engaged in online delivery of grocery will act in a pattern I predict. | 3.61 | 0.858 |
I trust in the policy for handling of personal information. | 3.58 | 0.801 |
Winning consumer trust in ecommerce is the wisdom of online grocery service providers. | 3.71 | 0.636 |
I trust that vendors are having integrity and will not take due advantage of the buyer. | 3.65 | 0.713 |
Item and Construct | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|
Online Grocery Purchase Intention (α = 0.607) | 4.13 | 0.485 |
I intend to use the online platform for grocery purchase. | 4.07 | 0.648 |
I would use online platform for purchasing grocery in the future. | 4.06 | 0.716 |
I would buy grocery online rather thanany other options available. | 4.19 | 0.826 |
I hope that online grocery will a compulsion for every e-commerce platform in future. | 4.22 | 0.660 |
Ind. Variable | Dep.Variable | β | Standard Error | t-Statistic | R | R2 | F-Value | p-Value | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT | OPI | 0.766 | 0.030 | 25 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 625.40 | 0.0 | Accepted |
CAT | CPR | 0.734 | 0.040 | 22.69 | 0.73 | 0.53 | 515.21 | 0.0 | Accepted |
CAT | CT | 0.723 | 0.043 | 21.98 | 0.72 | 0.52 | 483.37 | 0.0 | Accepted |
CPR | OPI | 0.655 | 0.029 | 18.19 | 0.66 | 0.43 | 331.09 | 0.0 | Accepted |
CT | OPI | 0.639 | 0.028 | 17.46 | 0.64 | 0.41 | 305.03 | 0.0 | Accepted |
Input | Test Statistics | Standard Error | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 0.710 | Sobel test | 13.32956 | 0.03488 | 0.000 |
B | 0.655 | Aroian test | 13.32105 | 0.03491 | 0.000 |
Sa | 0.043 | Goodman test | 13.33808 | 0.03486 | 0.000 |
Sb | 0.029 |
Input | Test Statistics | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ta | 21.157 | Sobel test | 16.85167 | 0.000 |
tb | 27.871 | Aroian test | 16.84479 | 0.000 |
Goodman test | 16.85855 | 0.000 |
Input | Test Statistics | Standard Error | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 0.934 | Sobel test | 27.34689 | 0.03077 | 0.000 |
B | 0.804 | Aroian test | 27.34322 | 0.03077 | 0.000 |
Sa | 0.018 | Goodman test | 27.35056 | 0.03076 | 0.000 |
Sb | 0.028 |
Input | Test Statistics | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ta | 54.761 | Sobel test | 24.97245 | 0.000 |
tb | 28.060 | Aroian test | 24.96915 | 0.000 |
Goodman test | 24.97575 | 0.000 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Habib, S.; Hamadneh, N.N. Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810221
Habib S, Hamadneh NN. Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 2021; 13(18):10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810221
Chicago/Turabian StyleHabib, Sufyan, and Nawaf N. Hamadneh. 2021. "Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic" Sustainability 13, no. 18: 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810221
APA StyleHabib, S., & Hamadneh, N. N. (2021). Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(18), 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810221