Teaching Industrial Ecology to Undergraduate Students: Lessons Learned
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Basis
2.1. Teaching Strategies
2.2. Teaching Content
3. Methodology
4. Background Information of IE Education at BIT
5. Framework of Teaching IE as a General Education Course for Undergraduate Students at BIT
5.1. The Content of the Course
5.1.1. Part One
5.1.2. Part Two
5.1.3. Part Three
5.1.4. Part Four
5.1.5. Part Five
5.1.6. Part Six
5.1.7. Part Seven
5.2. The Teaching Strategies of the Curriculum
6. Results and Discussion
6.1. Students’ Understanding on the Concept of IE at the Beginning of the Class
6.2. Role Playing Games Played an Important Role in the Course
6.3. Students’ Feedback on the Course
6.4. The Integrated Application of Teaching Strategies
7. Outlook
- A field trip on an industrial symbiosis was suggested by many students. However, field trips often face barriers such as institutional barriers, which leads to increasing difficulty of gaining permission from the university [46]. Many of the students choosing our course are from different majors. Furthermore, BIT requires all of the general education courses to be conducted in the evening. Thus, it is hard to find an appropriate time to arrange a field trip for students. As a result, it will be difficult to achieve a field trip in a short term. As an alternative, more videos and pictures made by teachers when investigating some industrial symbioses can be provided for students in class in order to make them see more of a real industrial symbiosis.
- Many students hope to have more time for the role playing games. This was also observed in experience of teaching sustainability using role play games [54]. The course involves many contents which is not easy to be finished within the 28 lecturing hours. For this reason, in addition to a moderate increase of time for role playing games, students can be encouraged to take more time to prepare for it before class, which assists in increasing efficiency and save time in class. In addition, the role playing games can be improved in order to make students more deeply feel the different roles played in implementing IE in reality. For example, students can exchange their roles when engaging role playing games and incorporate debate into this process.
- Currently, we still have not invited guest speakers to present specific topics on IE. Some researchers on IE education believe that guest lectures contribute to strengthening the connection between theory and practice [6,10,12,19]. In the future, guest lectures can be scheduled, which helps students further understand the practical application of IE.
- Feedback from students can be extended. Almost all of the students who chose the course are freshmen or sophomores. They will continue their undergraduate study after they received IE education in the university. The feedback can include tracking students’ future study, research, or work. Biswas [19] reported that feedback from former postgraduate students who were educated by IE and are now in the workforce has been gathered. Therefore, it will be interesting to see what roles of IE education will play for the students in the future.
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Parts | Teaching Hours | Contents | Brief Descriptions of the Contents |
---|---|---|---|
Part one | 2 | The resource and environmental challenges facing human development |
|
Part two | 3 | Ecosystem services |
|
Part three | 3 | The evolution of IE |
|
Part four | 4 | The basic methods, tools and techniques of IE |
|
Part five | 6 | Industrial symbiosis and eco-industrial parks |
|
Part six | 3 | Circular economy |
|
Part even | 7 | Case studies |
|
References
- Cockerill, K. Innovative industrial ecology education can guide us to sustainable paths. In Technological Choices for Sustainability; Sikdar, S.K., Glavič, P., Jain, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 77–90. [Google Scholar]
- Anand, C.K.; Bisaillon, V.; Webster, A.; Amor, B. Integration of sustainable development in higher education—A regional initiative in Quebec (Canada). J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 108, 916–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassen, R.H. Our common future: Report of the world commission on environment and development. Int. Aff. 1987, 64, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miguel, N.P.; Lage, J.C.; Galindez, A.M. Assessment of the development of professional skills in university students: Sustainability and serious games. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Côté, R.P. Exploring the analogy further. J. Ind. Ecol. 2000, 3, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finlayson, A.; Markewitz, K.; Frayret, J.M. Postsecondary education in industrial ecology across the world. J. Ind. Ecol. 2014, 18, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cockerill, K. A failure reveals success: A comparative analysis of environmental education, education for sustainable development, and industrial ecology education. J. Ind. Ecol. 2013, 17, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cervantes, G.A. Methodology for teaching industrial ecology. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2007, 8, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ning, W.; Chen, P.; Wu, F.; Cockerill, K.; Deng, N. Industrial ecology education at Wuhan University. J. Ind. Ecol. 2007, 11, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, Y.; Mitchell, B.; Zhu, Q. Teaching industrial ecology at Dalian University of Technology: Toward improving overall eco-efficiency. J. Ind. Ecol. 2009, 13, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brattebø, H. Industrial ecology and education. J. Ind. Ecol. 2002, 3, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marstrander, R.; Brattebø, H.; Røine, K.; Støren, S. Norway Teaching industrial ecology to graduate students: Experiences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. J. Ind. Ecol. 2000, 3, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, H.; Moriguichi, Y.; Yang, J. Industrial ecology in China, Part II: Education. J. Ind. Ecol. 2003, 7, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staniskis, J.K.; Stasiskiene, Z. An integrated approach to environmental education and research: A case study. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2007, 23, 1141–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goessling-Reisemann, S. Training engineers for sustainability at the University of Bremen. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2007, 23, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
- Matthews, D.H.; Hawkins, T.R.; Jaramillo, P.; Marriott, J.; Sharrard, A.L. The green design apprenticeship. J. Ind. Ecol. 2009, 13, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A. Interdisciplinary industrial ecology education: Recommendations for an inclusive pedagogical model. Asia Pac. J. Educ. 2009, 29, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eckelman, M.J.; Lifset, R.J.; Yessios, I.; Panko, K. Teaching industrial ecology and environmental management in Second Life. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1273–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, W.K. The importance of industrial ecology in engineering education for sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2012, 13, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shi, L. Industrial ecology education at Tsinghua University. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Côté, R.P. A framework for integrating ecosystem services into China’s circular economy: The case of eco-industrial parks. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- The National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. Circular Economy Promotion Law of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: www.lawinfochina.com/display.aspx?id=7025&lib=law# (accessed on 5 July 2021).
- Starr, C. Education for industrial ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 868–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chalkley, B. Education for sustainable development: Continuation. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 2006, 30, 235–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatti, L.; Ulrich, M.; Seele, P. Education for sustainable development through business simulation games: An exploratory study of sustainability gamification and its effects on students’ learning outcomes. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perdan, S.; Azapagic, A.; Clift, R. Teaching sustainable development to engineering students. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2000, 1, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coral, J.S. Engineering Education for a Sustainable Future. Ph.D. Thesis, Universtat Politechnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sterling, S. Sustainable Education: Re-Visioning Learning and Change. Schumacher Briefings; Green Books: Bristol, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Figueirò, P.S.; Raufflet, E. Sustainability in higher education: A systematic review with focus on management education. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barth, M.; Godemann, J.; Rieckmann, M.; Stoltenberg, U. Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2007, 8, 416–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cotton, D.; Baileyb, I.; Warrenb, M.; Bissell, S. Revolutions and second-best solutions: Education for sustainable development in higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 2009, 34, 719–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stubbs, W.; Schapper, J. Two approaches to curriculum development for educating for sustainability and CSR. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2011, 12, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotton, D.; Winter, J. ‘It’s not just bits of paper and light bulbs’: A review of sustainability pedagogies and their potential for use in higher education. In Sustainability Education: Perspectives and Practice across Higher Education; Jones, P., Selby, D., Sterling, S., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010; pp. 39–54. [Google Scholar]
- Christie, B.A.; Miller, K.K.; Cooke, R.; White, J.G. Environmental sustainability in higher education: How do academics teach? Environ. Educ. Res. 2013, 19, 385–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piasentin, F.B.; Roberts, L. What elements in a sustainability course contribute to paradigm change and action competence? A study at Lincoln University, New Zealand. Environ. Educ. Res. 2018, 24, 694–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widener, J.M.; Gliedt, T.; Tziganuk, A. Assessing sustainability teaching and learning in geography education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2016, 17, 698–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd-Elwahed, M.S.; Al-Bahi, A.M. Sustainability awareness in engineering curriculum through a proposed teaching and assessment framework. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 2021, 31, 633–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cebrián, G.; Mercè, J.; Mulà, I. Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teachers’ views. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2768–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Exley, K.; Dennick, R. Giving a Lecture: From Presenting to Teaching, 2nd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Azapagic, A.; Perdan, S.; Shallcross, D. How much do engineering students know about sustainable development? The findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 2005, 30, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosselmann, K. University and sustainability: Compatible agendas? Educ. Philos. Theory 2001, 33, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulder, K.F. Engineering curricula in sustainable development: An evaluation of changes at Delft University of Technology. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 2006, 31, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sprain, L.; Timpson, W.M. Pedagogy for sustainability science: Case-based approaches for interdisciplinary instruction. Environ. Commun. 2012, 6, 532–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prado, A.M.; Arce, R.; Lopez, L.E.; García, J.; Pearson, A.A. Simulations versus case studies: Effectively teaching the premises of sustainable development in the classroom. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 161, 303–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortese, A.; Hattan, A.S. Education for sustainability as the mission of higher education. Sustainability 2010, 3, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tziganuk, A.; Gliedt, T. Comparing faculty perceptions of sustainability teaching at two U.S. universities. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2017, 18, 1191–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.; Aggarwal, P.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, P. Fostering sustainability through education, research and practice: A case study of TERI University. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 61, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotton, D.R.E.; Warren, M.F.; Maiboroda, O.; Bailey, I. Sustainable development, higher education and pedagogy: A study of lecturers’ beliefs and attitudes. Environ. Educ. Res. 2007, 13, 579–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pullen, S.; Brinkert, K. SolEn for a sustainable future: Developing and teaching a multidisciplinary course on solar energy to further sustainable education in chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, F. Establishing transdisciplinary minor programme as a way to embed sustainable development into higher education system: Case by Tongji University, China. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2019, 20, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, Y.; Peng, L. Effective teaching and activities of excellent teachers for the sustainable development of higher design education. Sustainability 2020, 12, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dieleman, H.; Huisingh, D. Games by which to learn and teach about sustainable development: Exploring the relevance of games and experiential learning for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 837–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brundiers, K.; Wiek, A.; Redman, C.L. Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: From classroom into the real-world. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2010, 11, 308–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McConville, J.R.; Rauch, S.; Helgegren, I.; Kain, J. Using role-playing games to broaden engineering education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2017, 18, 594–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dlouhá, J.; Burandt, S. Design and evaluation of learning processes in an international sustainability oriented study programme. In search of a new educational quality and assessment method. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, A.C. Multiple-choice testing in education: Are the best practices for assessment also good for learning? J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 2018, 7, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carless, D.; Salter, D.; Yang, M.; Lam, J. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Stud. High. Educ. 2011, 36, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Semerjian, L.; El-Fadel, M.; Zurayk, R.; Nuwayhid, I. Interdisciplinary approach to environmental education. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2004, 130, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoare, A.; Cornell, A.; Bertram, C.; Gallagher, K.; Heslop, S.; Lieven, N.; MacLeod, C.; Morgan, J.; Pickering, A.; Wells, S.; et al. Teaching against the grain: Multi-disciplinary teamwork effectively delivers a successful undergraduate unit in sustainable development. Environ. Educ. Res. 2008, 14, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkins, T.R.; Matthews, D.H. A classroom simulation to teach economic input-output life cycle assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 2009, 13, 622–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Z.; Bi, J.; Moriguichi, Y. The circular economy: A new development strategy in China. J. Ind. Ecol. 2006, 10, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lowitt, P.; Côté, R.P. Putting the eco into eco parks. J. Ind. Ecol. 2013, 17, 343–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations (UN). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda/ (accessed on 17 March 2021).
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Green is Gold: The Strategy and Actions of China’s Ecological Civilization. 2016. Available online: http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/greenisgold.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2019).
- Frosch, D.; Gallopoulos, N. Strategies for manufacturing. Sci. Am. 1989, 261, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walls, J.L.; Paquin, R.L. Organizational perspectives of industrial symbiosis. Organ. Environ. 2015, 28, 32–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The Environmental Management of Industrial Estates; Industry and Environment Technical Report No. 39; United Nations Publication: Paris, France, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Côté, R.P.; Ellison, R.; Hall, J.G.; Klynstra, P.; Martin, M.; Wade, P. Designing and Operating Industrial Parks as Ecosystems; Technical Report; School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University: Halifax, NS, Canada, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Chertow, M. Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 2000, 25, 313–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Côté, R.P.; Hall, J. Industrial parks as ecosystem. J. Clean. Prod. 1995, 3, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Côté, R.P. Controlling chromium slag pollution utilising scavengers: A case of Shandong Province, China. Waste Manag. Res. 2015, 33, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, Y.; Côté, R.P. Scavengers and decomposers in an eco-industrial park. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2002, 9, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cossu, R.; Williams, I.D. Urban mining: Concepts, terminology, challenges. Waste Manag. 2015, 45, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.M.; Zhong, Y.G.; Geng, Y. A bibliometric and visual study on urban mining. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 118067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards a Circular Economy: Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/TCE_Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation_9-Dec-2015.pdf (accessed on 22 June 2016).
- Lozano, R. Diffusion of sustainable development in universities’ curricula: An empirical example from Cardiff University. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graedel, T.E.; Allenby, B.R. Gongye Shengtaixue [Industrial Ecology], 2nd ed.; Shi, H., Translator; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2003. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, M.W.; Teisl, M.F.; Criner, G.K. Attitude changes of undergraduate university students in general education courses. J. Gen. Educ. 2007, 56, 149–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hvenegaard, G. A novel approach to deepen understanding of undergraduates’ environmental backgrounds. Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ. 2007, 16, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, S.Y.; Jackson, N.L. Influence of an environmental studies course on attitudes of undergraduates at an engineering university. J. Environ. Educ. 2014, 45, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Branson, R. Re-constructing Kalundborg: The reality of bilateral symbiosis and other insights. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 4344–4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camargo, M.E.; Jacobi, P.; Ducrot, R. Role-playing games for capacity building in water and land management: Some Brazilian experiences. Simul. Gaming 2007, 38, 472–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lowry, P.E. A role-playing simulation course. J. Econ. Educ. 1999, 30, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lean, J.; Moizer, J.; Towler, M.; Abbey, C. Simulations and games: Use and barriers in higher education. Act. Learn. High. Educ. 2006, 7, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duchatelet, D.; Gijbels, D.; Bursens, P.; Donche, V.; Spooren, P. Looking at role-play simulations of political decision-making in higher education through a contextual lens: A state-of-the-art. Educ. Res. Rev. 2019, 27, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidiropoulos, E. The personal context of student learning for sustainability: Results of a multi-university research study. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 537–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menon, S.; Suresh, M. Synergizing education, research, campus operations, and community engagements towards sustainability in higher education: A literature review. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2020, 21, 1015–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen-Rosenthal, E. A walk on the human side of industrial ecology. Am. Behav. Sci. 2000, 44, 245–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Questions | Results | |
---|---|---|
1 | Are you aware of sustainability or sustainable development? |
|
2 | If yes, please provide some words to describe it. |
|
3 | Are you aware of IE? |
|
4 | If yes, where did you hear of IE-the Internet, news media, other courses, other sources? |
|
5 | If from previous courses, what are the names? |
|
6 | What is your understanding of IE? |
|
Playing Roles of Different Stakeholders | Reason for Implement IE | How to Implement IE |
---|---|---|
Company leaders |
|
|
Government officials |
|
|
General public |
|
|
Questions | Results | |
---|---|---|
1 | Are you attracted by IE? Why? | Almost all the students were attracted by IE. Reason examples:
|
2 | Which content are you most impressed by during this course? |
|
3 | Suggestions on this course? |
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, C.; Côté, R. Teaching Industrial Ecology to Undergraduate Students: Lessons Learned. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910491
Liu C, Côté R. Teaching Industrial Ecology to Undergraduate Students: Lessons Learned. Sustainability. 2021; 13(19):10491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910491
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Changhao, and Raymond Côté. 2021. "Teaching Industrial Ecology to Undergraduate Students: Lessons Learned" Sustainability 13, no. 19: 10491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910491
APA StyleLiu, C., & Côté, R. (2021). Teaching Industrial Ecology to Undergraduate Students: Lessons Learned. Sustainability, 13(19), 10491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910491