Measuring Customer Reservation Price for Maintenance, Repair and Operations of the Metro Public Transport System in Qatar
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Area
2.2. Data Analysis Framework
2.3. Data Gathering Strategy
2.3.1. Qualitative Research
- Books of accounts reviewing the cash received and expended, sales and purchases of goods and all assets and liabilities of the rail agencies;
- Contracts for zone works and engineering materials, writing down all works of repairs and maintenance plus the conveyance of materials, e.g., bricks, lime, sand and so on, which are likely to be required in an area during the year 2020 for the rail agencies;
- Recordings of internal transactions, extracting information about interdepartmental exchanges of assets, plus external transactions, collecting the exchanges between the rail agencies and suppliers;
- Statement of work paying attention to detailed requirements and pricing, with standard regulatory and governance terms and conditions.
2.3.2. Quantitative Research
2.4. Variables
2.5. Sampling Frame
2.6. Statistic Investigation
3. Outputs
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Improved understanding of customer reservation price for the railway MRO in Qatar;
- High demand of the MRO service by metro system Qatar user of the metro systems
- The economic value that beneficiaries of the systems attribute to improved services is QAR 327 per month;
- An important CRPm differential has been noticed between users from different metro stations;
- A significant proportion of users would benefit from a pay per train journey, in spite of the rise in the fare up to QAR 36 per train journey;
- The level of excludability of the railway MRO service, the involvement in rail management conferences and the time employed in taking the metro from an improved metro station are contingent with customer reservation price.
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UIC. Union of Railways, Sustainability, UIC—International Union of Railways. Available online: https://uic.org/sustainability/ (accessed on 3 September 2021).
- Ehteshami, A.; Horesh, N. China’s Presence in the Middle East: The Implications of the One Belt, One Road Initiative; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dinhobl, G.; Roth, R. (Eds.) Across the Borders: Financing the World’s Railways in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries; Routledge & CRC Press: Washington, WA, USA, 2016; Available online: https://www.routledge.com/Across-the-Borders-Financing-the-Worlds-Railways-in-the-Nineteenth-and/Dinhobl-Roth/p/book/9781138265424 (accessed on 5 September 2021).
- Bouchet, M.; Liu, S.; Parilla, J. Global Metro Monitor 2018; Brookings Institution: Washington, WA, USA, 2018; p. 48. [Google Scholar]
- El-Anis, I. Transport Infrastructure and Regional Integration in the Middle East. Muslim World 2021, 111, 27–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Gruyter, C.; Currie, G.; Rose, G. Sustainability Measures of Urban Public Transport in Cities: A World Review and Focus on the Asia/Middle East Region. Sustainability 2017, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pender, B.; Currie, G.; Delbosc, A.; Shiwakoti, N. Disruption Recovery in Passenger Railways: International Survey. Transp. Res. Rec. 2013, 2353, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UIC Communications. UIC Releases Its 2019 Activity Report. Available online: https://www.uic.org/com/enews/nr/699/article/uic-releases-its-2019-activity-report (accessed on 5 September 2021).
- Al-Rawashdeh, M.S.; AL-Qatatsheh, M.H. China’s strategy in the Middle East (The Silk Road Project). IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2017, 22, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najar, M.E.M.; Al Rahbi, A.K. Investigation future planning of railway networks in the arabs gulf countries. Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr. 2017, 1, 654–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bätzner, A.N.; Stephenson, M.L. Towards an integrated transport network in the GCC region: Fostering tourism and regional cooperation. In International Tourism Development and the Gulf Cooperation Council States; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.; Yin, C.; Chen, D.; Lv, H.; Zhang, Q. Cascading Failure in Multiple Critical Infrastructure Interdependent Networks of Syncretic Railway System. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bešinović, N. Resilience in railway transport systems: A literature review and research agenda. Transp. Rev. 2020, 40, 457–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dale, M.; Krumdieck, S.; Page, S.; Mulligan, K. Transitionscape: Generating Community-Based Sustainable Transport Initiatives; University of Canterbury Mechanical Engineering: Ilam, New Zealand, 2008; p. 7. [Google Scholar]
- Goetz Phillips, C.; Ruth Edwards, H. Socioeconomic, Community-Based Approach for Developing Integrated Mass Transit Systems: Application to City of Baltimore, Maryland. Transp. Res. Rec. 2002, 1793, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraga, C.C.L.; Borges, V.L.B. Tourist railway and tourism community-based: Some connections for planning and management. Cad. Virtual Tur. 2018, 18, 28–39. [Google Scholar]
- Van Der Bijl, R.; Van Oort, N.; Bukman, B. Light Rail Transit Systems: 61 Lessons in Sustainable Urban Development; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Kalaycioglu, S. Towards more functional economic cooperation in the middle east. Percept. J. Int. Aff. 2003, 8, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
- Newman, P.; Kenworthy, J.; Glazebrook, G. Peak Car Use and the Rise of Global Rail: Why This Is Happening and What It Means for Large and Small Cities. J. Transp. Technol. 2013, 3, 272–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gu, S.; Li, K. Reliability analysis of high-speed railway network. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 2019, 233, 1060–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiller, P.L.; Kenworthy, J.R. An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, Planning and Implementation, 2nd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansourianfar, M.H.; Haghshenas, H. Micro-scale sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transportation systems: Case study of Azadi district, Isfahan, Iran. Cities 2018, 72, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djordjević, B.; Mane, A.S.; Krmac, E. Analysis of dependency and importance of key indicators for railway sustainability monitoring: A new integrated approach with DEA and Pearson correlation. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2021, 100650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karjalainen, L.E.; Juhola, S. Framework for Assessing Public Transportation Sustainability in Planning and Policy-Making. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pulido, D.; Darido, G.; Munoz-Raskin, R.; Moody, J. The Urban Rail Development Handbook; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Poliak, M.; Tomicová, J.; Reuter, N. Impact of indirect user participation on public transport financing. Arch. Motoryz. 2019, 86, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolova, C. User charges for the railway infrastructure in Bulgaria. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2008, 42, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tánczos, K.; Farkas, G. Problems and issues of defining user charges for railway infrastructure. Period. Polytech. Transp. Eng. 2000, 28, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, S.; Lo, H.K. Property Models for Financing Railway Development. In Sustainable Railway Futures; Routledge: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Götz, G.; Schäfer, J.T. Financing Railways. In Handbook on Railway Regulation; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2020; Available online: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781789901771/9781789901771.00024.xml (accessed on 2 September 2021).
- Iwasaki, H. Financing mechanisms for transport infrastructure and services. In Routledge Handbook of Transport in Asia; Routledge: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Dolinayova, A.; Danis, J.; Cerna, L. Regional Railways Transport—Effectiveness of the Regional Railway Line. In Sustainable Rail Transport; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, J.; Iossa, E. Delegation of Contracting in the Private Provision of Public Services. Rev. Ind. Organ. 2006, 29, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wangai, A.W.; Rohacs, D.; Boros, A. Supporting the Sustainable Development of Railway Transport in Developing Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chege, S.M.; Wang, D.; Suntu, S.L.; Bishoge, O.K. Influence of technology transfer on performance and sustainability of standard gauge railway in developing countries. Technol. Soc. 2019, 56, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitriou, H.T.; Gakenheimer, R. Urban Transport in the Developing World: A Handbook of Policy and Practice; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Estache, A.; Serebrisky, T. Where do We Stand on Transport Infrastructure Deregulation and Public-Private Partnership? Social Science Research Network: Rochester, NY, USA, 2004; Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=610400 (accessed on 2 September 2021).
- Kuriakose, P.N.; Bhattacharjee, J. India’s Public Transport Systems: The Role of Metro Rail. In Railway Transportation in South Asia: Infrastructure Planning, Regional Development and Economic Impacts; Mitra, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Roy, S., Ponce Dentinho, T., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamurcu, M.; Eren, T. Transportation planning with analytic hierarchy process and goal programming. Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J. 2018, 2, 92–97. [Google Scholar]
- Phang, S.-Y. Strategic development of airport and rail infrastructure: The case of Singapore. Transp. Policy 2003, 10, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casullo, L. Rail Funding and Financing. Rev. Netw. Econ. 2017, 16, 125–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergantino, A.S.; Madio, L. High-Speed Rail, Inter-Modal Substitution and Willingness-to-Pay. A Stated Preference Analysis for the “Bari-Rome”; Social Science Research Network: Rochester, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whelan, G.; Crockett, J.; Consultancy, M. An investigation of the willingness to pay to reduce rail overcrowding. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Choice Modelling, Harrogate, UK, 30 March–1 April 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, R.; Newman, P. Does urban rail increase land value in emerging cities? Value uplift from Bangalore Metro. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2018, 117, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- How Democratic Is the Middle East? 9 September 2005. Available online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3784765.stm (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- Gardner, D.; Qatar Shows How to Manage a Modern Monarchy. Financial Times. 25 June 2013. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/2e141faa-dd82-11e2-a756-00144feab7de (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- Population of Qatar by Nationality in 2019. Priya DSouza Communications 15 August 2019. Available online: http://priyadsouza.com/population-of-qatar-by-nationality-in-2017/ (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- Tok, M.E.; Alkhater, L.R.M.; Pal, L.A. Policy-Making in a Transformative State: The Case of Qatar. In Policy-Making in a Transformative State: The Case of Qatar; Tok, M.E., Alkhater, L.R.M., Pal, L.A., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2016; pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GDP Per Capita, PPP (Current International $)|Data. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- GNI Per Capita, Atlas Method (Current US$)|Data. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- 2019 Human Development Index Ranking|Human Development Reports. 30 April 2020. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20200430080741/http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/2019-human-development-index-ranking (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- Indices & Data|Human Development Reports (HDR)|United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20130112042847/http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- Where in the World Do People Emit the Most CO2? Our World in Data. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/per-capita-co2 (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- Middle Powers: Squeezed out or Adaptive? Public Diplomacy Magazine. 17 March 2015. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20150317144416/http://publicdiplomacymagazine.com/middle-powers-squeezed-out-or-adaptive/ (accessed on 14 August 2021).
- Henderson, J.C. Hosting the 2022 FIFA World Cup: Opportunities and challenges for Qatar. J. Sport Tour. 2014, 19, 281–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khodr, H. Exploring the driving factors behind the event strategy in Qatar: A case study of the 15th Asian Games. Int. J. Event Festiv. Manag. 2012, 3, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qatar Rail Website Home. Available online: https://corp.qr.com.qa/English/Pages/default.aspx (accessed on 3 September 2021).
- Li, Z.; Hensher, D.A. Crowding and public transport: A review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal. Transp. Policy 2011, 18, 880–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nellthorp, J.; Bristow, A.L.; Day, B. Introducing Willingness-to-pay for Noise Changes into Transport Appraisal: An Application of Benefit Transfer. Transp. Rev. 2007, 27, 327–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bachok, S.; Ponrahono, Z. Modelling willingness to pay for improved public transport services: The challenges of non-response to stated preference hypothetical questions. Plan. Malays. 2017, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wulansari, D.N.; Maulana, A.C.; Astari, M.D. Analysis of ability to pay and willingness to pay for Jakarta light rail transit in Jakarta, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design (ICCED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 23–25 November 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marleau Donais, F.; Abi-Zeid, I.; Waygood, E.O.D.; Lavoie, R. A review of cost–benefit analysis and multicriteria decision analysis from the perspective of sustainable transport in project evaluation. EURO J. Decis. Process. 2019, 7, 327–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, P.-O.; De Rus, G. On the Treatment of Foreigners and Foreign-owned Firms in the Cost-benefit Analysis of Transport Projects. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 2019, 53, 275–287. [Google Scholar]
- Denant-Boemont, L.; Faulin, J.; Hammiche, S.; Serrano-Hernandez, A. Valuations of Transport Nuisances and Cognitive Biases: A Survey Laboratory Experiment in the Pyrenees Region. Environ. Model. Assess. 2021, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putri, A.L.; Widyastuti, H. Study of willingness to pay the Jakarta-Bandung highspeed train: A case study of Argo Parahyangan train passangers. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 650, 012048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hensher, D.A. Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2010, 44, 735–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliveira, L.; Bruen, C.; Birrell, S.; Cain, R. What passengers really want: Assessing the value of rail innovation to improve experiences. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2019, 1, 100014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matos Silva, C.; Serro, J.; Dinis Ferreira, P.; Teotónio, I. The socioeconomic feasibility of greening rail stations: A case study in Lisbon. Eng. Econ. 2019, 64, 167–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banzhaf, H.S. Constructing Markets: Environmental Economics and the Contingent Valuation Controversy. Hist. Political Econ. 2017, 49, 213–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, Y.-K.; Peng, F.-L.; Wang, Y. Valuing external benefits of underground rail transit in monetary terms: A practical method applied to Changzhou City. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 83, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besanko, D. Restructuring Rail Systems: Implications for Network Quality and Welfare. In U.S. Freight Rail Economics and Policy; Routledge: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Utsunomiya, K. The value of local railways: An approach using the contingent valuation method. Res. Transp. Econ. 2018, 69, 554–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, J.M.; Beck, M.J.; Hensher, D.A. The joint estimation of respondent-reported certainty and acceptability with choice. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2015, 71, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivalai, T.; Rojniruttikul, N. Determinants of the State Railway of Thailand’s (SRT) Total Quality Management process: SEM analysis. J. Int. Stud. 2018, 11, 118–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarasvathy, S.D.; Dew, N.; Venkataraman, S. Shaping Entrepreneurship Research: Made, as Well as Found; Routledge: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Weisberg, S. Applied Linear Regression; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J.; Cohen, P.; West, S.G.; Aiken, L.S. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- El-Geneidy, A.; Diab, E.; Jacques, C.; Mathez, A. Sustainable Urban Mobility in the Middle East and North Africa; Global Report on Human Settlements; United Nations Pck edition: New York, NY, USA, 2013; p. 60. [Google Scholar]
- Khadem Sameni, M.; Preston, J.; Khadem Sameni, M. Evaluating efficiency of passenger railway stations: A DEA approach. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2016, 20, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, R.C.; Carson, R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method; RFF Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Gall-Ely, M. Definition, Measurement and Determinants of the Consumer’s Willingness to Pay: A Critical Synthesis and Avenues for Further Research. Rech. Appl. Mark. Engl. Ed. 2009, 24, 91–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Station 2020 | Lines | Number of Lines | Users per Month in 2020 (Thousand) |
---|---|---|---|
Msheireb | Red, gold, green | 3 | 3228 |
Souq. Waqif | Gold | 1 | 908 |
Lusail | Red | 1 | 361 |
Hamad Intl. Airport | Red | 1 | 1744 |
West Bay | Red | 1 | 1610 |
Corniche | Red | 1 | 729 |
Hamad Hospital | Green | 1 | 256 |
Al Bidda | Red, green | 2 | 2663 |
Variable | Description | Motivation | Level |
---|---|---|---|
Excludability | Improved rail system user reservation price | Citizens living in a more exclusive neighbourhood present higher user reservation price [1,2,3] | 0 to 13 |
Reliability | Level of reliability of the improved metro system operating safe transport | Reliability of rail systems is related to a financial cost that citizens manage to use [6,7,8] | 0: non-operational 10/4: suspended every second day 20/4: suspended once per month 30/4: suspended once every 6 months 10: continuous provision |
Conference | Regular attendance to rail conferences arranged by the government | Users who usually attend rail conferences are more conscious of the budgetary necessities of the rail system [4] | 0: No 10: Yes |
Duration | Duration in taking the train at another train station. | User reservation price rises if duration to take the train is higher, presuming that opportunity costs will be improved [9,10] | 0: less than 15 min 10/3: between 15 and 30 min 20/3: between 31 and 60 min 10: over 60 min |
Options | Distance from optional metro station to users | Citizens request of improved metro transport service depends on existing options [5,62] | 0: options placed close to users 10: options placed distant from users |
Expense | Level of user expense per month | Citizens who reveal higher monthly expenses have more resources to pay their rail tariffs [1,2,3] | 0: less than USD 1000 * 10/3: between USD 1000 and USD 3000 20/3: between USD 3100 and USD 6000 10: more than USD 6000 * |
Station | Physical | Managerial | Operational | Social | Weight | Excludability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Msheireb | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | M |
Souq Waqif | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | M |
Lusail | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | M |
Hamad Intl. Airport | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | S |
West Bay | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | B |
Corniche | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | S |
Hamad Hospital | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | M |
Al Bidda | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | M |
Station | Users per Month in 2020 (Thousand) | Participants | % Error | % Participation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Msheireb | 3228 | 140 | 8.1 | 4.34 |
Souq. Waqif | 908 | 144 | 7.5 | 15.86 |
Lusail | 361 | 142 | 6.41 | 39.34 |
Hamad Intl. Airport | 1744 | 140 | 7.95 | 8.03 |
West Bay | 1610 | 143 | 7.69 | 8.88 |
Corniche | 729 | 107 | 8.76 | 14.68 |
Hamad Hospital | 256 | 149 | 5.2 | 58.2 |
Al Bidda | 2663 | 144 | 7.94 | 5.41 |
Total | 11,499 | 1109 | 2.8 | 9.64 |
Gender | Age | Employment | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | Over 60 | 26–60 | Under 25 | Commerce | Oil Sector | Others | ||||||
Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | ||||||||
298 | 801 | 96 | 754 | 243 | 209.6 | 52.4 | 591.6 | 104.4 | 155.2 | 38.8 | |||
Education | Family members | ||||||||||||
Secondary | Primary | Unofficial | +12 | 9–12 | 5–8 | 2–4 | |||||||
Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | ||||||||
142.8 | 95.2 | 324.35 | 174.65 | 241.15 | 129.85 | 95 | 244 | 522 | 245 |
Station | N | Mean (SD) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Options | Reliablility | Duration | Expense | Conference | CRPm | CRPj | ||
Msheireb | 140 | 5.64 (4.98) | 5.02 (2.80) | 3.36 (2.63) | 4.22 (2.05) | 2.88 (4.54) | 268.71 (262.89) | 16.87 (41.09) |
Souq. Waqif | 144 | 5.55 (4.99) | 4.62 (2.06) | 2.73 (2.70) | 4.52 (2.00) | 4.48 (4.99) | 287.80 (156.15) | 25.77 (45.38) |
Lusail | 142 | 6.40 (4.82) | 6.39 (2.39) | 4.76 (2.91) | 5.64 (2.44) | 7.86 (4.12) | 261.76 (175.50) | 60.42 (64.43) |
Hamad Intl. Airport | 140 | 0.98 (2.99) | 0.93 (2.53) | 5.24 (3.73) | 0.41 (1.17) | 3.77 (4.86) | 173.93 (246.44) | 15.32 (52.20) |
West Bay | 143 | 6.67 (4.74) | 5.86 (2.75) | 2.77 (2.62) | 5.41 (2.50) | 3.66 (4.83) | 730.28 (1052.52) | 51.05 (51.95) |
Corniche | 107 | 3.94 (4.91) | 4.55 (3.48) | 4.62 (2.89) | 3.52 (2.99) | 4.52 (5.00) | 234.86 (226.62) | 17.56 (28.53) |
Hamad Hospital | 149 | 7.04 (4.58) | 3.96 (2.64) | 3.49 (2.39) | 4.27 (3.22) | 6.33 (4.84) | 439.38 (350.52) | 71.14 (125.69) |
Al Bidda | 144 | 4.41 (4.99) | 5.40 (3.75) | 3.96 (3.37) | 2.81 (2.85) | 4.76 (5.01) | 193.40 (285.79) | 27.78 (60.70) |
Predictors | Log (CRPm) | Log (CRPj) |
---|---|---|
Reliability | 0.168 ** | 0.216 ** |
Expense | 0.300 ** | 0.248 ** |
Conference | 0.067 * | 0.158 ** |
Duration | 0.089 ** | 0.130 ** |
Options | 0.119 ** | 0.248 ** |
Excludability | 0.393 ** | 0.398 ** |
Station | Log (CRPj) | Log (CRPm) | ||||||||
Reliability | Expense | Conf. | Duration | Options | Reliability | Expense | Conf. | Duration | Options | |
Msheireb | −0.094 | 0.278 ** | 0.269 ** | 0.141 | 0.088 | 0.037 | 0.140 | 0.144 | 0.144 | 0.028 |
Souq. Waq. | 0.249 ** | 0.163 | 0.249 ** | −0.148 | −0.079 | −0.135 | 0.072 | −0.172 | −0.194 | 0.036 |
Lusail | 0.138 | 0.024 | 0.097 | 0.028 | 0.111 | −0.028 | 0.013 | −0.093 | 0.011 | −0.185 |
Hamad I. A. | 0.018 | 0.075 | −0.007 | 0.191 * | −0.094 | 0.040 | 0.163 | 0.472 ** | 0.611 ** | 0.143 |
West Bay | −0.053 | −0.117 | 0.341 ** | 0.021 | −0.081 | −0.049 | −0.017 | 0.054 | −0.059 | 0.080 |
Corniche | 0.032 | −0.131 | 0.018 | −0.053 | −0.188 | 0.050 | −0.030 | 0.142 | 0.039 | 0.280 ** |
Hamad H. | −0.053 | −0.113 | 0.239 ** | −0.165 * | 0.164 | 0.035 | 0.054 | 0.077 | 0.087 | 0.022 |
Al Bidda | −0.079 | −0.193 * | 0.296 ** | −0.073 | 0.133 | −0.161 | 0.197 * | −0.061 | 0.255 ** | 0.392 ** |
Level of Interch. | Log (CRPj) | Log (CRPm) | ||||||||
Reliability | Expense | Conf. | Duration | Options | Reliability | Expense | Conf. | Duration | Options | |
Total small | 0.137 * | 0.094 | 0.022 | 0.076 | −0.078 | 0.226 ** | 0.271 ** | 0.270 ** | 0.424 ** | 0.167 * |
Total med. | −0.046 | 0.146 ** | 0.359 ** | 0.029 | 0.135 ** | 0.110 ** | 0.166 ** | 0.018 | 0.066 | 0.037 ** |
Total big | −0.053 | −0.117 | 0.341 ** | 0.021 | −0.081 | −0.049 | −0.017 | 0.054 | −0.059 | 0.080 |
Log (CRPj) | Log (CRPm). | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | F | R2 | SE | Model Sig | Variable Sig | β | Variable | F | R2 | SE | Model Sig | Variable Sig | β |
Constant excludability | 209.43 | 0.162 | 0.523 | 0.000 | 0.000 0.000 | 1.801 0.070 | Constant excludability | 201.04 | 0.156 | 0.742 | 0.000 | 0.000 0.000 | 0.314 0.098 |
Constant excludability time | 130.09 | 0.193 | 0.513 | 0.000 | 0.000 0.000 0.000 | 1.625 0.077 0.034 | Constant excludability conference | 136.07 | 0.200 | 0.722 | 0.000 | 0.004 0.000 0.000 | 0.156 0.097 0.034 |
Constant excludability conference duration | 93.22 | 0.205 | 0.720 | 0.000 | 0.420 0.000 0.000 0.013 | 0.055 0.101 0.035 0.018 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Larumbe, J. Measuring Customer Reservation Price for Maintenance, Repair and Operations of the Metro Public Transport System in Qatar. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911023
Larumbe J. Measuring Customer Reservation Price for Maintenance, Repair and Operations of the Metro Public Transport System in Qatar. Sustainability. 2021; 13(19):11023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911023
Chicago/Turabian StyleLarumbe, Jaime. 2021. "Measuring Customer Reservation Price for Maintenance, Repair and Operations of the Metro Public Transport System in Qatar" Sustainability 13, no. 19: 11023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911023
APA StyleLarumbe, J. (2021). Measuring Customer Reservation Price for Maintenance, Repair and Operations of the Metro Public Transport System in Qatar. Sustainability, 13(19), 11023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911023