Knowledge Management in Entrepreneurship Education as the Basis for Creative Business Development
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Entrepreneurship Education Concept
1.2. The Evolution of Concepts
1.3. Relative Works
2. Materials and Methods
- Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi (the United Arab Emirates);
- KIMEP University, Almaty (the Republic of Kazakhstan);
- The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow (the Russian Federation).
- Collaborative problem-solving skills of students in OECD, partner, and neighbor countries;
- Annual expenditure per student of OECD, partner, and neighbor countries.
3. Results
3.1. Data Analysis
- The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow (the Russian Federation): 35.2% [51];
- KIMEP University, Almaty (the Republic of Kazakhstan): 33.4% [52];
- Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi (the United Arab Emirates): 31.6% [53].
3.2. The Structural Components of Motivation Model
4. Conclusions
5. Research Limitation and Further Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aleksejeva, L. Country’s competitiveness and sustainability: Higher education impact. J. Secur. Sustain. Issues 2016, 5, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timokhovich, A.; Loktionova, Y.N.; Tsirin, A.; Sevalnev, V.; Lukyanets, A. Globalization in the Economies of Kazakhstan and China. Int. J. Manag. Bus. Res. 2019, 9, 157–166. [Google Scholar]
- Grabara, J.; Hussain, H.I.; Szajt, M. Sustainable University Development through Sustainable Human Resources and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Role of Sustainable Innovation and Work Environment. Amfiteatru Econ. 2020, 22, 480–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ordóñez de Pablos, P.; Lytras, M. Knowledge management, innovation and big data: Implications for sustainability, policy making and competitiveness. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohendet, P.; Parmentier, G.; Simon, L. Managing knowledge, creativity and innovation. In The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2017; pp. 197–214. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Fabus, M.; Bae, K.H.; Zhang, M. A diamond model based analysis for improving the sustainable competitiveness in educational exports by Chinese colleges and universities. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2020, 7, 1858–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzghoul, A.; Elrehail, H.; Emeagwali, O.L.; AlShboul, M.K. Knowledge management, workplace climate, creativity and performance. J. Workplace Learn. 2018, 30, 592–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boje, D.M.; Baca-Greif, H.; Intindola, M.; Elias, S. The episodic spiral model: A new approach to organizational processes. J. Organ. Change Manag. 2017, 30, 683–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tvaronavičienė, M. Preconditions of sustainable entrepreneurship: Estimating of Brexit scenarious impact on macroeconomic environment. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2018, 17, 222–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratten, V.; Jones, P. Entrepreneurship and management education: Exploring trends and gaps. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2020, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šafránková, J.M.; Šikýř, M. Sustainable development of the professional competencies of university students: Comparison of two selected cases from the Czech Republic. J. Secur. Sustain. Issues 2017, 7, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanova, E.V.; Vinogradova, I.A.; Zadadaev, S.A. The Study of School Educational Environment in the Context of Ensuring Equal Access to Quality Education. Educ. Sci. J. 2019, 21, 69–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astakhova, L.V. The concept of student cognitive culture: Definition and conditions for development. Educ. Sci. J. 2019, 21, 89–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piroșcă, G.I.; Șerban-Oprescu, G.L.; Badea, L.; Dedu, S. Education for Sustainable Development–An Evaluation of Students’ Perceptions within the Bucharest University of Economic Studies. Amfiteatru Econ. 2020, 22, 346–361. [Google Scholar]
- Nabi, G.; Liñán, F.; Fayolle, A.; Krueger, N.; Walmsley, A. The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2017, 16, 277–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gavurová, B.; Belás, J.; Kotásková, A.; Cepel, M. Management of education concepts in the field of entrepreneurship of university students in the Czech Republic. Polish J. Manag. Stud. 2018, 17, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, H.; Ma, Z.; Jiao, S.; Chen, X.; Lv, X.; Zhan, Z. The sustainable personality in entrepreneurship: The relationship between big six personality, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention in the Chinese context. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zampetakis, L.A. The role of creativity and proactivity on perceived entrepreneurial desirability. Think. Skills Creat. 2008, 3, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Randel, A.E.; Jaussi, K.S. Giving rise to creative leadership: Contextual enablers and redundancies. Group Organ. Manag. 2019, 44, 288–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topp, L.; Mair, D.; Smillie, L.; Cairney, P. Knowledge management for policy impact: The case of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre. Palgrave Commun. 2018, 4, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Pascual, L.; Galende, J. The impact of knowledge and motivation management on creativity. Empl. Relat. 2017, 39, 732–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Corter, J.E. The effect of manipulating group task orientation and support for innovation on collaborative creativity in an educational setting. Think. Skills Creat. 2019, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tur-Porcar, A.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Llorca Mestre, A. Factors affecting entrepreneurship and business sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Halberstadt, J.; Schank, C.; Euler, M.; Harms, R. Learning sustainability entrepreneurship by doing: Providing a lecturer-oriented service learning framework. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kriegbaum, K.; Becker, N.; Spinath, B. The relative importance of intelligence and motivation as predictors of school achievement: A meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 2018, 25, 120–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geher, G.; Betancourt, K.; Jewell, O. The link between emotional intelligence and creativity. Imagin. Cogn. Pers. 2017, 37, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodwyn, A. Expert Teachers: An International Perspective; Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Nowell, C. The influence of motivational orientation on the satisfaction of university students. Teach. High. Educ. 2017, 22, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pugh, K.J.; Bergstrom, C.M.; Spencer, B. Profiles of transformative engagement: Identification, description, and relation to learning and instruction. Sci. Educ. 2017, 101, 369–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajis, D.; Chaar, B.; Moles, R. Rethinking Competence: A Nexus of Educational Models in the Context of Lifelong Learning. Pharmacy 2020, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sein-Echaluce, M.; García-Peñalvo, F.J.; Fidalgo-Blanco, A. Students’ knowledge sharing to improve learning in academic engineering courses. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2016, 32, 1024–1035. [Google Scholar]
- Juhaňák, L.; Zounek, J.; Rohlíková, L. Using process mining to analyze students’ quiz-taking behavior patterns in a learning management system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 92, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grand-Clement, S. Digital Learning: Education and Skills in the Digital Age. RAND Europe. 2017. Available online: https://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF369.html (accessed on 7 December 2020).
- Michel, A.; Heisig, P. 21st Century Skills for Knowledge Managers. In WM 2019-Wissensmanagement in Digitalen Arbeitswelten: Aktuelle Ansätze und Perspektiven-Knowledge Management in Digital Workplace Environments; State of the Art and Outlook: Berlin, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Rus-Casas, C.; Eliche-Quesada, D.; Aguilar-Peña, J.D.; Jiménez-Castillo, G.; La Rubia, M.D. The Impact of the Entrepreneurship Promotion Programs and the Social Networks on the Sustainability Entrepreneurial Motivation of Engineering Students. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomšik, R. Choosing teaching as a career: Importance of the type of motivation in career choices. Tem J. 2016, 5, 396–400. [Google Scholar]
- Escolar-Llamazares, M.C.; Luis-Rico, I.; de la Torre-Cruz, T.; Herrero, Á.; Jiménez, A.; Palmero-Cámara, C.; Jiménez-Eguizábal, A. The socio-educational, psychological and family-related antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions among Spanish Youth. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eicher, L.C. The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. Coll. Univ. 2020, 95, 77–78. [Google Scholar]
- Barba-Sánchez, V.; Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2018, 24, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barba-Sánchez, V.; Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. Entrepreneurial motivation and self-employment: Evidence from expectancy theory. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2017, 13, 1097–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fenton, N. 20 Psychological Principles That Will Help your Students Learn More Effectively: Psych Learning Curve. Psych Learning Curve. 2019. Available online: http://psychlearningcurve.org/these-psychological-principles-will-help-your-students-learn-more-effectively/ (accessed on 7 December 2020).
- Hortigüela Alcalá, D.; Hernando Garijo, A.; Pérez-Pueyo, Á.; Fernández-Río, J. Cooperative Learning and Students’ Motivation, Social Interactions and Attitudes: Perspectives from Two Different Educational Stages. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Deci, E.; Ryan, R. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Jubari, I.; Hassan, A.; Liñán, F. Entrepreneurial intention among University students in Malaysia: Integrating self-determination theory and the theory of planned behavior. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2019, 15, 1323–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liñán, F.; Fayolle, A. A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2015, 11, 907–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hameed, I.; Khan, M.B.; Shahab, A.; Hameed, I.; Qadeer, F. Science, technology and innovation through entrepreneurship education in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Sustainability 2016, 8, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boldureanu, G.; Ionescu, A.M.; Bercu, A.M.; Bedrule-Grigoruță, M.V.; Boldureanu, D. Entrepreneurship Education through Successful Entrepreneurial Models in Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sutar, R.L. Working Memory Load and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition in College Students. Ph.D. Thesis, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Barba-Sánchez, V.; Atienza-Sahuquillo, C.; McCracken, M.; Matlay, H. The development of entrepreneurship at school: The Spanish experience. Educ. Train. 2016, 58, 7–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Understanding the Brain (Summary in Russian); OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- RANEPA (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration). The Official Site. Available online: https://www.ranepa.ru (accessed on 7 December 2020).
- KIMEP University. The Official Site. Available online: https://kimep.kz (accessed on 7 December 2020).
- Al Ain University. The Official Site. Available online: https://aau.ac.ae (accessed on 7 December 2020).
- De Boeck, P.; Scalise, K. Collaborative problem solving: Processing actions, time, and performance. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- König, J. Motivations for teaching and relationship to general pedagogical knowledge. OECD iLibrary 2017, 1, 151–169. [Google Scholar]
- Eurostat. The Official Site. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed on 7 December 2020).
- OECD. PISA 2015 Results (Volume V): Collaborative Problem Solving; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- König, J.; Blömeke, S.; Paine, L.; Schmidt, W.H.; Hsieh, F.J. General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. J. Teach. Educ. 2011, 62, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Frolova, Y.; Alwaely, S.A.; Nikishina, O. Knowledge Management in Entrepreneurship Education as the Basis for Creative Business Development. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031167
Frolova Y, Alwaely SA, Nikishina O. Knowledge Management in Entrepreneurship Education as the Basis for Creative Business Development. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3):1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031167
Chicago/Turabian StyleFrolova, Yuliya, Suad A. Alwaely, and Olga Nikishina. 2021. "Knowledge Management in Entrepreneurship Education as the Basis for Creative Business Development" Sustainability 13, no. 3: 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031167
APA StyleFrolova, Y., Alwaely, S. A., & Nikishina, O. (2021). Knowledge Management in Entrepreneurship Education as the Basis for Creative Business Development. Sustainability, 13(3), 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031167