Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamics of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids for Inhibiting the Spontaneous Combustion of Sulfide Ore
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Meta-Analysis Attending SDG 3 and 4 of the 2030 Agenda
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Analytical Approach for Optimal Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generations in Radial Electrical Energy Distribution Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Demand-Side Flexibility in Power Systems: A Survey of Residential, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural Sectors

by
Hessam Golmohamadi
Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
Sustainability 2022, 14(13), 7916; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137916
Submission received: 3 June 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Storage Technologies in Future Energy Systems)

Abstract

:
In recent years, environmental concerns about climate change and global warming have encouraged countries to increase investment in renewable energies. As the penetration of renewable power goes up, the intermittency of the power system increases. To counterbalance the power fluctuations, demand-side flexibility is a workable solution. This paper reviews the flexibility potentials of demand sectors, including residential, industrial, commercial, and agricultural, to facilitate the integration of renewables into power systems. In the residential sector, home energy management systems and heat pumps exhibit great flexibility potential. The former can unlock the flexibility of household devices, e.g., wet appliances and lighting systems. The latter integrates the joint heat–power flexibility of heating systems into power grids. In the industrial sector, heavy industries, e.g., cement manufacturing plants, metal smelting, and oil refinery plants, are surveyed. It is discussed how energy-intensive plants can provide flexibility for energy systems. In the commercial sector, supermarket refrigerators, hotels/restaurants, and commercial parking lots of electric vehicles are pointed out. Large-scale parking lots of electric vehicles can be considered as great electrical storage not only to provide flexibility for the upstream network but also to supply the local commercial sector, e.g., shopping stores. In the agricultural sector, irrigation pumps, on-farm solar sites, and variable-frequency-drive water pumps are shown as flexible demands. The flexibility potentials of livestock farms are also surveyed.

1. Introduction

Recently, the environmental concerns about climate change have increased noticeably [1]. To overcome global warming, the EU Commission committed to emit at least 55% less greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and become climate-neutral by 2050. To decarbonize the energy systems, one solution is to increase renewable power penetration, e.g., solar and wind, in energy systems [2]. By increasing the penetration of renewable energies, the intermittency of power systems increases considerably. To counterbalance the renewable power intermittency, demand-side flexibility is a practical solution. Flexibility potentials of electrical consumers can be unlocked in response to power system requirements when a power shortage occurs on the supply side [3] or system reliability is jeopardized due to unforeseen failure. Demand-side flexibility is discussed in different sectors, including residential [4], industrial [5], commercial [6], and agricultural sectors [7]. Therefore, it needs expert knowledge to unlock, aggregate, and finally integrate flexibility potentials into power systems. It is evident that the knowledge of demand flexibility for heavy industry, e.g., an oil refinery plant, is quite different from Home Energy Management Systems (HEMSs). As a result, the flexibility potentials should be discussed in each sector individually.
In the residential sector, the HEMS is a smart control panel to manage the energy consumption of household appliances [8]. The flexibility of household appliances is discussed for wet appliances [9], electric water heaters [10], refrigerators [11], and ovens [12]. Heat pumps are flexible demands not only to decarbonize the residential heating systems but also to increase energy efficiency [13]. The private parking of Electric Vehicles (EVs) with charging stations is addressed to increase the flexibility potential of households [14].
In the industrial sector, heavy and light industries can provide demand flexibility for power systems. Industries, especially heavy industries, are energy-intensive plants that integrate demand flexibility of the industrial processes as well as the self-generation facilities, e.g., gas turbines and diesel engines, into energy systems. In cement manufacturing plants, some processes, e.g., crushers, can be exploited during off-peak hours [15]. Therefore, they can provide peak shaving and/or valley filling for the power system. Moreover, the raw and cement mills can provide power flexibility at short advance notice without causing an interruption to the production line. In the steel, metal, and aluminum industries, the operation of smelting pots can be scheduled during off-peak hours [16]. Generally, the smelting pots are operated in discrete processes; therefore, the next round of pots’ operation can be shifted or delayed in response to power system requirements. In oil refinery industries, the energy demand mainly includes electricity, heat, and steam [17]. Therefore, self-generation facilities, e.g., gas turbines and heat boilers, provide flexibility for the gas and power networks.
In the commercial sector, supermarket refrigerators [18] and ice bank storage are practical solutions. The flexibility potentials of retail and strip malls, restaurants, and hotels are discussed in the research study [19]. Recently, by increasing the penetration of EVs, public parking lots with smart charging stations are considered a great electrical storage plant to charge/discharge electrical energy from/to power grids when the upstream network encounters excess/deficit of electrical power [20].
In the agricultural sector, the water irrigation pump is the dominant electrical demand [21]. In the open-air farms, the solar-based irrigation system can be operated to meet the crops’ needs when the peak demand of the power system coincides with the peak crop evapotranspiration [22]. In the greenhouse farms, the operation of the cooling and heating system exhibits great flexibility potential [23]. In livestock farms, the application of heat pumps can provide power flexibility [24].
The abovementioned survey shows that there are many flexibility opportunities in different demand sectors. This paper aims to elaborate on the flexibility potentials of the demand sectors, including residential, industrial, commercial, and agricultural. Figure 1 describes a schematic diagram of flexibility potentials for demand sectors. As the figure reveals, the four major demand sectors are classified into subsectors. The subsectors are explained in separate sections in the paper. Despite the demand sector classification, the applications of demand flexibility in power systems can be stated as follows:
(1)
Frequency control [25,26];
(2)
Up-/down-power regulation [27];
(3)
Voltage support [28];
(4)
Reserve market support (spinning, non-spinning) [29];
(5)
Power congestion mitigation [30];
(6)
Peak shaving and/or valley filling [31];
(7)
Energy system decarbonization [32];
(8)
Renewable power integration [33].
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the general insight of power flexibility is described for demand sectors. Section 3 explains the flexibility potential of the residential sector. The Demand Response (DR) opportunities of industrial processes are surveyed in Section 4. In Section 5, the commercial sector is discussed. The agricultural sector and possible flexible demands are stated in Section 6. Section 7 explains the necessity of intermediary demand response aggregators, challenges, and future insights. Finally, Section 8 concludes the study.
Figure 1. Classification of demand flexibility for four different sectors: residential [34], industrial [35], agricultural [36], and commercial [37].
Figure 1. Classification of demand flexibility for four different sectors: residential [34], industrial [35], agricultural [36], and commercial [37].
Sustainability 14 07916 g001

2. Demand Flexibility

Demand flexibility refers to the ability of electrical consumption to change/shift/adjust/curtail the electricity consumption in response to an external request, e.g., electricity price, financial incentives, and technical requirements [38]. Therefore, the flexible demands respond to Demand Response Programs (DRPs) to provide benefits for the demand side and/or the supply side [39]. Demand response studies encounter great sources of uncertainties about renewable power generation, electricity price, demand participation, and load level. To hedge against the uncertainties, stochastic programming and robust optimization are addressed widely. In stochastic programming, uncertain variables can be modeled as different scenarios with special probability distribution functions [40]. In robust optimization, demand flexibility is evaluated over the most important uncertain variable. In this approach, the uncertain variable is defined by upper and lower thresholds, while no probability function is stated [41].
From the benefits point of view, the DRPs can be observed from the demand- and supply-side separately. Regarding the demand side, the consumers can take advantage of reduced electricity bills and financial incentives in the form of bill deduction, financial rewards, and low electricity prices directly [42]. Moreover, as the penetration of DRPs increases on the demand side, the reliability of power systems and distribution grids increases [43]. As a result, the consumers take advantage of more stable power grids with lower outage probability, as an indirect advantage [44]. To implement DRPs, the consumers respond to two types of programs: (i) price-based programs [45] and (ii) incentive-based programs [46]. In the former, the demand flexibility is unlocked in response to the electricity price. Different energy pricing schemes are used in power systems to encourage consumers to actively respond to energy price variations. Among them, Time-of-Use (TOU) [47], Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) [48], and dynamic pricing [49] are widely used. In the latter, some financial incentives are offered to consumers to persuade them to contribute to DRPs.
On the supply side, DRPs and flexible demands provide two types of power system support, including global and local support [50]. In the former, the whole power system benefits from the demand flexibility. In the literature, many global benefits are addressed in power systems worldwide. Frequency control [51], power regulation [52], flexibility reserve [53], peak shaving/valley filling [54], decarbonizing the power systems [55], optimization of power system operation cost [56], facilitation of renewable power integration [57], enhancement of power system reliability [58], and reduction of investment cost in power systems are the most important global support. In the local support, the local distribution network takes the advantage of the flexible demands. Mitigation of power congestion [59,60], voltage support [61], power loss minimization [62], and power quality improvement [63] are the key local support. Volt–Var energy management approach is addressed in distribution systems to improve voltage profile and Var injection in demand sectors [34]. It is worth mentioning that although most electrical consumers are supplied by low- and medium-voltage distribution grids, some large power consumers, e.g., heavy industries, are connected to transmission networks directly. Therefore, the local power system support conveys local benefits for both the distribution and transmission networks.
Renewable energy can be integrated as large-scale generation units into the supply side or small-scale Distributed Generation (DG) into the demand side. On the supply side, large-scale wind farms [64], solar farms [65], geothermal [66], hydropower [67], run-of-river [68], and biomass [68] are addressed. On the demand side, Roof-top Photovoltaic (RPV) [69] and micro-wind turbines are used. Despite the type of renewable energy, demand-side flexibility is a necessity to counterbalance the renewable energy intermittency. It is worth mentioning that the Renewable DGs (RDGs) may be integrated into stand-alone (off-grid) or grid-connected demands. In the former, the off-grid RDGs are used for sustainable rural electrification [70]. In the latter, the RDGs supply the demand sectors to provide global and local support, e.g., cost reduction, voltage improvement, and power loss reduction [71].

3. Residential Demand Flexibility

Demand flexibility in residential buildings is normally managed by the HEMS [72]. The HEMS can control the energy consumption of household appliances, e.g., washing machines [73], tumble dryers [74], dishwashers [75], lighting systems [76], and Heat Ventilation and Air conditioning (HVAC) [77]. In the literature, the household appliances are classified into uncontrollable, Thermostatically Controlled Appliances (TCAs) [78], and Non-Thermostatically Controlled Appliances (NTCAs). The uncontrollable appliances include audio/video devices, elevators, and emergency lighting systems. No flexibility is expected from this class of appliances. The TCAs are the key flexibility resource of residential dwellings. These appliances follow thermal dynamic models to unlock joint heat-to-power flexibility. They include water heaters [79], refrigerators [80], HVAC, and heat pumps. The NTCAs provide lower flexibility in comparison to the TCAs. Non-emergency lighting systems and wet appliances are the most flexible NTCAs. Some studies have been conducted to show how the HEMS can optimize the energy consumption of household appliances in response to electricity price variations [81].
Recently, the penetration of heat pumps has increased in residential dwellings, and it is expected to replace the traditional heating systems in many regions. In some case studies, it was proposed that the HEMS controls the operation of HVAC and heat pumps. However, due to the complexity of heat controllers, the operation of heat pumps is delegated to sophisticated controllers [82]. The heat controllers unlock the heat flexibility of the building while meeting the residents’ comfort [83]. The resident comfort bound is normally defined as a setpoint with lower and upper thresholds. Therefore, the heat controller aims to maintain the indoor temperature within the comfort bound. The flexibility of heat pumps stems from the existing gap between the upper and lower thresholds of indoor temperature. When a power shortage/excess occurs in the electricity market, the heat controller optimizes the operation of the heat pump and maintains the indoor temperature close to the lower/upper threshold of the bound [84]. In some studies, the heat controller is integrated with thermal storage devices [85]. In many studies, water tanks are suggested as economic thermal storage for residential buildings [86]. Therefore, the heat controllers integrated with thermal storage can provide much more flexibility potential for upstream networks. The water tank stores the heat energy when the energy price is low or when the power system encounters renewable power excess. Consequently, it supplies the demand, including space heating and Domestic Hot Water (DHW) consumption, when the power system faces a renewable power shortage and/or the electricity price is high [87].
The energy consumption of the heating system depends on the physical characteristics of the buildings and weather conditions. For buildings with high-quality materials and good insulation, the energy efficiency of the building is relatively high [88]. Therefore, the energy consumption of the building is more robust to weather conditions. Adversely, in buildings with poor thermal insulation, the energy consumption of the heat pumps is more sensitive to ambient conditions. As a result, the flexibility potentials of the former are more than the latter. The heat controllers optimize the energy consumption by solving the thermal dynamics of the buildings. The thermal dynamics are normally described by Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) [89]. The ODEs of thermal dynamics include thermal coefficients which are specific to target buildings. Therefore, in order to design a heat controller, the thermal coefficients should be estimated.
In the literature, three general approaches are addressed to estimate the thermal dynamics, including white-box [90], gray-box [91], and black-box algorithms [92]. The white-box approach addresses the physical models of buildings and requires a lot of input data. The input data may include indoor air temperature, inflow/outflow water temperature, mass flow, and heat pump power consumption. In some cases, such data are not available due to the residents’ privacy. In contrast to white-box models, the black-box approaches are model-free methods that are easy to implement. Artificial neural networks [93], genetic algorithm [94], and support vector machine [95] have been addressed recently. Still, they need a large amount of input data to train the machine learning algorithms. As a result, they are not applicable in case studies with building data scarcity. The gray-box models address both the physical model of the white-box and statistical methods of the black-box approaches simultaneously. Therefore, it is the most robust approach to estimate the thermal dynamic of buildings. This model is compatible with Model Predictive Control (MPC) theory. MPC has been widely used in recent studies to unlock the flexibility potential of heat pumps [96]. In [97], Economic MPC (EMPC) was suggested to optimize the operation of heat pumps in response to electricity market prices. To provide a general insight, Table 1 explains some key residential flexibility potentials and applications.

4. Industrial Demand Flexibility

Industries are energy-intensive consumers; therefore, the nominal energy consumption of industrial processes is high in comparison to other demand sectors. If the flexibility potentials of industrial processes are unlocked, a great value of power flexibility is provided for the upstream networks. Industrial processes are divided into interruptible and uninterruptible processes. The interruptible processes are those which can be turned off/on without causing damage to the equipment and products. In contrast, the uninterruptible processes are not allowed to be turned off/on regularly or it results in severe damage to the installations or feedstocks. In many studies, the uninterruptible processes are capable of turning up/down the energy consumption on short advance notice without causing any damage to the production line and product.
In modern cement manufacturing plants, crushers are considered interruptible processes. Therefore, they can be switched off on short advance notice. Moreover, the operation of crushers can be scheduled on long advance notice, e.g., 24 h, in the day-ahead markets [119]. The mills, including raw and cement mills, are critical to keep the production line in service. Therefore, the flexibility potentials of the mills are lower than crushers [35]. In some studies, it is suggested that the rotational speed of mills can be adjusted within a very limited bound without causing any interruption. Therefore, the energy consumption of the mills can be turned up/down to provide power flexibility. In [119], material storage was suggested to increase the flexibility of cement and raw mills. It proposed constructing storage for the output of raw and cement mills to supply the feedstock for the next processes uninterruptedly. In this way, the mills can be switched off/on in response to the flexibility requirements of the power system. Financial incentives are suggested in some studies to encourage heavy industries to participate in DRPs when the power system encounters a severe power shortage [120].
Metal smelting plants comprise different smelting pots. Generally, the smelting process is uninterruptible. Therefore, it is not allowed to switch off the melting furnaces once it is started or severe damage and financial costs are incurred. Although it is impossible to turn off the running furnaces, it is still possible to turn down/up the power consumption [121]. As a result, the running furnace can provide limited power flexibility. A research study suggested adjusting the transformers’ tab to unlock the flexibility of the electric arc furnace [122]. Once the duty of the furnace is completed, the next working round can be delayed in response to the flexibility requirements of the power system. To meet the production value constraint of the factory, the energy engineers rotate the operation of the smelting furnace between different lines.
The oil refinery industries are consumers of power, heat, and steam. The key point is that most of these industries are supplied partially by self-generation facilities. Therefore, some part of the required heat and steam is produced by local gas turbines, Combined Heat and Power (CHP), and boilers. While there is a strong correlation between the generation of power, heat, and steam, the oil refinery plants are capable of providing energy flexibility for gas and power networks. In [123], cogeneration facilities and on-site solar generation units were suggested to increase the flexibility of the industrial plant. A robust optimization model is proposed to unlock the flexibility of the refinery processes in response to energy prices [124].
Although some key industries are stated, there are many flexibility potentials in other industries which need further investigations. Table 2 classifies some flexible industrial processes with their applications in power systems.

5. Commercial Demand Flexibility

The commercial demand sector is normally defined as electricity consumption in non-manufacturing business establishments, e.g., restaurants, hotels, shopping stores, and warehouses. Recently, by increasing the penetration of EVs, commercial parking lots with smart charging stations emerged to provide flexibility for the power grid and offer a benefit for vehicle owners. In contrast to the residential and industrial sectors, the commercial DRPs are not well defined. Therefore, more studies are needed to investigate the flexibility opportunities.
Supermarket refrigerators are flexible demands in the commercial sector. The flexibility potential of supermarket refrigerators stems from the stored energy in the thermal mass of refrigerated foodstuff [136]. To unlock the flexibility of refrigerators, the study proposed a novel approach to estimating the food temperature. Based on results, the approach can increase demand flexibility between 60% and 100% during the first 70 to 150 min. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted in Germany to investigate the flexibility potentials of hotels, restaurants, and offices called the service sector [137]. The results conclude that the flexible appliances of the service sector can provide 22 TWh of theoretical potential, i.e., approximately equivalent to 35% of the total power consumption of the service sector. In [138], the demand response potentials of hotels and tourist accommodation facilities were stated using joint heat-to-power energy flexibility. The study emphasized that the potentials are independent of tourists’ behaviors and aim to increase the share of renewables in the sector. The demand response opportunities of refrigerated warehouses were surveyed [139]. As the study revealed, the duration, the percentage of warehouse load, and the season are the key factors affecting the flexibility potential of a refrigerated warehouse. A methodology was proposed in a research study [140] to quantify the demand flexibility of lighting systems in commercial buildings. The approach uses dynamic daylight simulation considering stochastic occupancy. Based on the simulation, the average capacity of lighting curtailment is around 32% of the peak lighting demand.
Recently, the penetration of EVs has been increasing noticeably worldwide. Therefore, many commercial parking lots are retrofitted with smart charging stations. The parking lots supply parking space for commercial complexes. The parked EVs function as electrical storage with a dwell time. Therefore, a significant amount of power storage is available for the parking operator to integrate into the power system. In this way, the parking operator acts as a Demand Response Aggregator (DRA) to optimize the charging/discharging strategies of the parked EVs. The parking lots can use the storage capacity to supply the local electrical demand of the commercial complexes, e.g., food court, cinema, and shopping stores [141]. The parked EVs can discharge to the commercial microgrid when the electricity price is high and charge from the main grid when the electricity price is low [142]. Length of dwelling time, number of parked EVs, and consent of EV owners to participate in DRPs are key factors that impact the flexibility potential of the commercial parking lots. If the charging/discharging schedule of EVs is coordinated properly, the EV owners and parking lot operator can make a profit, and the power system operator takes the advantage of power flexibility.

6. Agricultural Demand Flexibility

Agricultural or farming refers to activities to cultivate plants and breed livestock. The plant farms are split into open-air farms and greenhouse farms. In the open-air farms, the water irrigation systems are the most energy-intensive consumption. The water pumps draw water from underground wells and/or surface water resources. In [143], the water pool was suggested to increase the flexibility of water irrigation pumps. The study proposed stochastic energy management to unlock the flexibility potentials of water irrigation pumps in response to uncertain electricity prices in power systems with high renewable power penetration. Therefore, the water pumps can store water in the storage pools when an excess of renewable power occurs (low-price hours). Afterward, the farm can be irrigated by the stored water during the shortage of renewable power (high-price hours). Moreover, it was suggested to store water in water tank towers during high renewable power availability. Consequently, the farms’ sprinklers will be supplied by the stored water via gravity during low-renewable-power hours. In some studies, photovoltaic irrigation pumps are addressed as practical solutions to provide flexibility for both the power grid and farms [144].
In countries with tropical or hot weather conditions, the peak demand of the power grid perfectly coincides with the peak demand of the water irrigation system. The reason is that the hot weather normally occurs at midday hours when the peak demand of cooling systems and peak crop evapotranspiration occur concurrently. To overcome the problem, a research study suggested a robust optimization to draw water from underground reservoirs to water tank towers in off-peak hours and supply the crops at midday hours without needing to run energy-intensive pumps [145]. In [146], agricultural DRPs were introduced to decarbonize power systems. It was suggested to restructure the agricultural sector to utilize renewable power, including wind and solar, in farms. A review study was conducted to survey the main challenges and opportunities of DRPs in the agricultural sector [36]. Based on the scoping study, water irrigation capacity, time of water delivery, on-farm crew availability, and financial incentives are the main barriers to implement DRPs on farms.
In greenhouse farms, the operation of cooling and heating systems can provide power flexibility [147]. The heat pumps are addressed not only to increase the energy efficiency of greenhouse farming but also to decrease CO2 emissions. The study concluded that the heat pump system can provide energy efficiency of 25% to 65% more than traditional combustion-based systems [148]. Technical assessment is provided to harness geothermal energy for heating/cooling systems of greenhouse farming in Ecuador [149].
In livestock farms, some flexibility potentials were discussed in recent studies. Poultry, piggery, and dairy farms are the most important studies in this field. In the research study, a new term “poultry demand-side management” was suggested to increase the penetration of solar energies in poultry electricity consumption and decrease dependency on the main grid [150]. In New Zealand, dairy farms were studied to shift the main electricity consumption out of peak hours and to provide balance for the power systems [151]. Based on the results, the power consumption of the irrigation and milking-related processes contribute to the peak demand of the farm. In [152], it was discussed that piggery waste can be used to generate electricity. The study reviewed current potentials in Cyprus. The on-farm electricity generation can provide flexibility for the farm and upstream grid. Air-source heat pumps are addressed in pig farms to increase the use of renewable energy, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide economic benefits for the farm [153].

7. Challenges and Future Insights

In the previous sections, different flexibility potentials of demand sectors were surveyed. It was shown how the industrial processes, commercial sectors, agricultural farms, and household appliances can provide flexibility for the power systems. Although the flexibility potential is known in some sectors, more studies are required to investigate new potentials. Moreover, the flexibility potentials of different sectors should be aggregated and integrated into power systems. In other words, segregated and unintegrated potentials may not meet power system requirements. To achieve the aim, intermediary entities emerged in recent years to play a pivotal role between the supply and demand sides. The entities are called Demand Response Aggregators (DRAs), Demand Response Providers (DRPs), and Flexibility Management Systems (FMSs). Although the applications of the mentioned entities are different in detail, they aim to facilitate the integration of demand flexibilities into energy systems. Demand response management needs expert knowledge in different sectors. Therefore, the coordination mechanism of DRPs between demand sectors is quite complex. As a result, sophisticated control schemes are required to coordinate DRPs between demand sectors with different response times and flexibility. Despite the coordination issues, there are still some barriers to unlocking demand flexibility or motivating consumers to participate in DRPs. Among them, the most important challenges can be stated as follows (but not limited to):
(1)
Regulatory barriers, e.g., lack of regulation or tax issues for flexible industries;
(2)
Financial incentives for flexible consumers;
(3)
Lack of motivation and widespread adoption of DRPs;
(4)
Technological challenges, e.g., lack of IoT and data storage/processing facilities.
Currently, many research studies and projects are being conducted to increase the share of Power-to-X (P2X) in energy systems. To provide sustainable energy in the P2X, more flexibility opportunities are expected for multi-carrier and energy hubs. By increasing the penetration of renewable hydrogen in future energy systems, the flexibility potentials of the power network, heat network, mobility sector, and gas network should be unlocked to counterbalance the renewable energy fluctuations. Therefore, future studies will focus more on the flexible operation of electrolyzer facilities and demand sectors.

8. Conclusions

In this paper, the flexibility potentials of demand sectors were surveyed. The sectors included residential, industrial, commercial, and agricultural demands. In the residential sector, HEMSs can unlock the flexibility potential of household appliances. The TCAs, e.g., heat pumps, HVAC, and electric water heaters, exhibit great potentials. The non-TCAs, including wet appliances, are practical solutions to shift power consumption out of peak hours. In the industrial sector, many interruptible processes can provide great values of flexibility for power systems. Among them, cement crushes and mills can be curtailed with prior notification. The power consumption of smelting furnaces can be adjusted on short advance notice through transformers’ tabs. In the commercial sector, the flexibility opportunities of commercial buildings and tourist accommodation facilities, e.g., hotels and restaurants, were addressed. The refrigerated supermarkets and refrigerated warehouses are workable solutions to integrate flexibility into power systems. Moreover, by increasing the penetration of EVs, public parking lots are turning into great electrical storage facilities to provide power regulation for power systems. In the agricultural sector, open-air farms take the advantage of flexible water irrigation pumps. Water tank towers are great sources of energy flexibility not only to provide peak shaving for the power grid but also to decrease the farms’ operation costs. In greenhouse farming, heat pumps can provide flexibility for cooling and heating purposes. The livestock farms, dairy farms, poultry, and piggery farms are capable of shifting power consumption out of peak hours.
Although the flexibility potentials of demand sectors were described, more studies should be conducted to coordinate the flexibility potentials of demand sectors in response to power system requirements. The penetration of power-to-x facilities is increasing in energy systems worldwide. Therefore, future studies should focus on the flexible interoperation of hydrogen energy, electrolyzers, and demand sectors.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jakučionytė-Skodienė, M.; Liobikienė, G. Climate change concern, personal responsibility and actions related to climate change mitigation in EU countries: Cross-cultural analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 281, 125189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, M.; Virguez, E.; Shan, R.; Tian, J.; Gao, S.; Patiño-Echeverri, D. High-resolution data shows China’s wind and solar energy resources are enough to support a 2050 decarbonized electricity system. Appl. Energy 2022, 306, 117996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Erenoğlu, A.K.; Şengör, İ.; Erdinç, O.; Taşcıkaraoğlu, A.; Catalão, J.P.S. Optimal energy management system for microgrids considering energy storage, demand response and renewable power generation. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 136, 107714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sasaki, K.; Aki, H.; Ikegami, T. Application of model predictive control to grid flexibility provision by distributed energy resources in residential dwellings under uncertainty. Energy 2022, 239, 122183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Panuschka, S.; Hofmann, R. Impact of thermal storage capacity, electricity and emission certificate costs on the optimal operation of an industrial energy system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 185, 622–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Van Zoest, V.; El Gohary, F.; Ngai, E.C.H.; Bartusch, C. Demand charges and user flexibility—Exploring differences in electricity consumer types and load patterns within the Swedish commercial sector. Appl. Energy 2021, 302, 117543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pamučar, D.; Behzad, M.; Božanić, D.; Behzad, M. Decision making to support sustainable energy policies corresponding to agriculture sector: Case study in Iran’s Caspian Sea coastline. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 292, 125302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bahramara, S. Robust Optimization of the Flexibility-constrained Energy Management Problem for a Smart Home with Rooftop Photovoltaic and an Energy Storage. J. Energy Storage 2021, 36, 102358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vellei, M.; Le Dréau, J.; Abdelouadoud, S.Y. Predicting the demand flexibility of wet appliances at national level: The case of France. Energy Build. 2020, 214, 109900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lakshmanan, V.; Sæle, H.; Degefa, M.Z. Electric water heater flexibility potential and activation impact in system operator perspective—Norwegian scenario case study. Energy 2021, 236, 121490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zehir, M.A.; Bagriyanik, M. Demand Side Management by controlling refrigerators and its effects on consumers. Energy Convers. Manag. 2012, 64, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Javaid, N.; Ahmed, F.; Ullah, I.; Abid, S.; Abdul, W.; Alamri, A.; Almogren, A.S. Towards Cost and Comfort Based Hybrid Optimization for Residential Load Scheduling in a Smart Grid. Energies 2017, 10, 1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Mor, G.; Cipriano, J.; Grillone, B.; Amblard, F.; Menon, R.P.; Page, J.; Brennenstuhl, M.; Pietruschka, D.; Baumer, R.; Eicker, U. Operation and energy flexibility evaluation of direct load controlled buildings equipped with heat pumps. Energy Build. 2021, 253, 111484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cañigueral, M.; Meléndez, J. Flexibility management of electric vehicles based on user profiles: The Arnhem case study. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 133, 107195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, E.; Baek, K.; Kim, J. Evaluation of Demand Response Potential Flexibility in the Industry Based on a Data-Driven Approach. Energies 2020, 13, 6355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cuvelier, T. Embedding reservoirs in industrial models to exploit their flexibility. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marton, S.; Langner, C.; Svensson, E.; Harvey, S. Costs vs. Flexibility of Process Heat Recovery Solutions Considering Short-Term Process Variability and Uncertain Long-Term Development. Front. Chem. Eng. 2021, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hovgaard, T.G.; Larsen, L.F.S.; Jørgensen, J.B. Flexible and cost efficient power consumption using economic MPC a supermarket refrigeration benchmark. In Proceedings of the 2011 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 12–15 December 2011; pp. 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yin, R.; Kara, E.C.; Li, Y.; DeForest, N.; Wang, K.; Yong, T.; Stadler, M. Quantifying flexibility of commercial and residential loads for demand response using setpoint changes. Appl. Energy 2016, 177, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Babic, J.; Carvalho, A.; Ketter, W.; Podobnik, V. A data-driven approach to managing electric vehicle charging infrastructure in parking lots. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2022, 105, 103198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pardo Picazo, M.Á.; Juárez, J.M.; García-Márquez, D. Energy Consumption Optimization in Irrigation Networks Supplied by a Standalone Direct Pumping Photovoltaic System. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Muralidhar, K.; Rajasekar, N. A review of various components of solar water-pumping system: Configuration, characteristics, and performance. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2021, 31, e13002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chou, S.K.; Chua, K.J.; Ho, J.C.; Ooi, C.L. On the study of an energy-efficient greenhouse for heating, cooling and dehumidification applications. Appl. Energy 2004, 77, 355–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Byrne, P.S.; Carton, J.G.; Corcoran, B. Investigating the Suitability of a Heat Pump Water-Heater as a Method to Reduce Agricultural Emissions in Dairy Farms. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Y.-K.; Tang, K.-T. Frequency Support by Demand Response—Review and Analysis. Energy Procedia 2019, 156, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, V.P.; Samuel, P.; Kishor, N. Impact of demand response for frequency regulation in two-area thermal power system. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2017, 27, e2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chassin, D.P.; Behboodi, S.; Shi, Y.; Djilali, N. H2-optimal transactive control of electric power regulation from fast-acting demand response in the presence of high renewables. Appl. Energy 2017, 205, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, Q.; Hui, H.; Ding, Y.; Ye, C.; Lin, Z.; Wang, P.; Song, Y.; Ji, L.; Chen, R. Use of demand response for voltage regulation in power distribution systems with flexible resources. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2020, 14, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mimica, M.; Sinovčić, Z.; Jokić, A.; Krajačić, G. The role of the energy storage and the demand response in the robust reserve and network-constrained joint electricity and reserve market. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2022, 204, 107716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Golmohamadi, H.; Ramezani, M.; Bashian, A.; Falaghi, H. Risk-based maintenance scheduling of generating units in the deregulated environment considering transmission network congestion. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2014, 2, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhao, L.; Aravinthan, V. Strategies of residential peak shaving with integration of demand response and V2H. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Hong Kong, China, 8–11 December 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Misconel, S.; Zöphel, C.; Möst, D. Assessing the value of demand response in a decarbonized energy system—A large-scale model application. Appl. Energy 2021, 299, 117326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McPherson, M.; Stoll, B. Demand response for variable renewable energy integration: A proposed approach and its impacts. Energy 2020, 197, 117205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Davarzani, S.; Pisica, I.; Taylor, G.A.; Munisami, K.J. Residential Demand Response Strategies and Applications in Active Distribution Network Management. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Golmohamadi, H. Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 156, 111963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Golmohamadi, H. Agricultural Demand Response Aggregators in Electricity Markets: Structure, Challenges and Practical Solutions- a Tutorial for Energy Experts. Technol. Econ. Smart Grids Sustain. Energy 2020, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Darwazeh, D.; Duquette, J.; Gunay, B.; Wilton, I.; Shillinglaw, S. Review of peak load management strategies in commercial buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 77, 103493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Golmohamadi, H.; Keypour, R.; Niasati, M. Composite System Maintenance Coordination in a Smart Grid Considering Demand Response. Technol. Econ. Smart Grids Sustain. Energy 2016, 1, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Babatunde, O.M.; Munda, J.L.; Hamam, Y. Power system flexibility: A review. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Golmohamadi, H.; Keypour, R.; Hassanpour, A.; Davoudi, M. Optimization of green energy portfolio in retail market using stochastic programming. In Proceedings of the 2015 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), Charlotte, NC, USA, 4–6 October 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Golmohamadi, H.; Keypour, R. Application of Robust Optimization Approach to Determine Optimal Retail Electricity Price in Presence of Intermittent and Conventional Distributed Generation Considering Demand Response. J. Control. Autom. Electr. Syst. 2017, 28, 664–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jin, M.; Feng, W.; Marnay, C.; Spanos, C. Microgrid to enable optimal distributed energy retail and end-user demand response. Appl. Energy 2018, 210, 1321–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Metwaly, M.K.; Teh, J. Probabilistic Peak Demand Matching by Battery Energy Storage Alongside Dynamic Thermal Ratings and Demand Response for Enhanced Network Reliability. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 181547–181559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hui, H.; Ding, Y.; Song, Y. Adaptive time-delay control of flexible loads in power systems facing accidental outages. Appl. Energy 2020, 275, 115321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. McKenna, K.; Keane, A. Residential Load Modeling of Price-Based Demand Response for Network Impact Studies. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2016, 7, 2285–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zheng, S.; Sun, Y.; Li, B.; Qi, B.; Shi, K.; Li, Y.; Tu, X. Incentive-Based Integrated Demand Response for Multiple Energy Carriers Considering Behavioral Coupling Effect of Consumers. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020, 11, 3231–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Golmohamadi, H.; Keypour, R. Stochastic optimization for retailers with distributed wind generation considering demand response. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2018, 6, 733–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Chen, W.; Qiu, J.; Chai, Q. Customized Critical Peak Rebate Pricing Mechanism for Virtual Power Plants. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2021, 12, 2169–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, D.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, H.; Goh, H.H.; Liu, H.; Wu, T. Multi-Objective Optimization for Smart Integrated Energy System Considering Demand Responses and Dynamic Prices. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2022, 13, 1100–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Golmohamadi, H. Virtual Storage Plants in Parking Lots of Electric Vehicles Providing Local/Global Power System Supports. Energy Storage 2021, 43, 103249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Engels, J.; Claessens, B.; Deconinck, G. Grid-Constrained Distributed Optimization for Frequency Control With Low-Voltage Flexibility. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020, 11, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wang, W.; Jing, S.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Niu, Y.; Zeng, D.; Cui, C. Combined heat and power control considering thermal inertia of district heating network for flexible electric power regulation. Energy 2019, 169, 988–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khatami, R.; Parvania, M.; Narayan, A. Flexibility Reserve in Power Systems: Definition and Stochastic Multi-Fidelity Optimization. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020, 11, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guo, N.; Wang, Y.; Yan, G. A double-sided non-cooperative game in electricity market with demand response and parameterization of supply functions. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 126, 106565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hamedi, K.; Sadeghi, S.; Esfandi, S.; Azimian, M.; Golmohamadi, H. Eco-Emission Analysis of Multi-Carrier Microgrid Integrated with Compressed Air and Power-to-Gas Energy Storage Technologies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Dong, F.; Qin, Y.; Ma, Z.; Ma, Y.; Li, J. Novel flexibility evaluation of hybrid combined cooling, heating and power system with an improved operation strategy. Appl. Energy 2021, 300, 117358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, J.; Liu, F.; Li, Z.; Shao, C.; Liu, X. Grid-side flexibility of power systems in integrating large-scale renewable generations: A critical review on concepts, formulations and solution approaches. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ndawula, M.B.; Hernando-Gil, I.; Li, R.; Gu, C.; De Paola, A. Model order reduction for reliability assessment of flexible power networks. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 127, 106623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fonteijn, R.; Nguyen, P.H.; Morren, J.; Slootweg, J.G. Demonstrating a generic four-step approach for applying flexibility for congestion management in daily operation. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2020, 23, 100378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bashian, A.; Hojat, M.; Javidi, M.H.; Golmohamadi, H. Security-Based Tariff for Wheeling Contracts Considering Fair Congestion Cost Allocation. J. Control. Autom. Electr. Syst. 2014, 25, 368–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Li, P.; Wei, M.; Ji, H.; Xi, W.; Yu, H.; Wu, J.; Yao, H.; Chen, J. Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Adaptive Voltage Control of Active Distribution Networks with Multi-terminal Soft Open Point. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 141, 108138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jangdoost, A.; Keypour, R.; Golmohamadi, H. Optimization of distribution network reconfiguration by a novel RCA integrated with genetic algorithm. Energy Syst. 2020, 12, 801–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alshehri, J.; Khalid, M. Power Quality Improvement in Microgrids Under Critical Disturbances Using an Intelligent Decoupled Control Strategy Based on Battery Energy Storage System. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 147314–147326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. McKenna, R.; Pfenninger, S.; Heinrichs, H.; Schmidt, J.; Staffell, I.; Bauer, C.; Gruber, K.; Hahmann, A.N.; Jansen, M.; Klingler, M.; et al. High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs. Renew. Energy 2022, 182, 659–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sward, J.A.; Siff, J.; Gu, J.; Zhang, K.M. Strategic planning for utility-scale solar photovoltaic development—Historical peak events revisited. Appl. Energy 2019, 250, 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hu, Y.; Cheng, H.; Tao, S. Opportunity and challenges in large-scale geothermal energy exploitation in China. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bakken, T.H.; Sundt, H.; Ruud, A.; Harby, A. Development of Small Versus Large Hydropower in Norway– Comparison of Environmental Impacts. Energy Procedia 2012, 20, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Venus, T.E.; Hinzmann, M.; Bakken, T.H.; Gerdes, H.; Godinho, F.N.; Hansen, B.; Pinheiro, A.; Sauer, J. The public’s perception of run-of-the-river hydropower across Europe. Energy Policy 2020, 140, 111422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kalair, A.R.; Abas, N.; Hasan, Q.U.; Seyedmahmoudian, M.; Khan, N. Demand side management in hybrid rooftop photovoltaic integrated smart nano grid. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Odou, O.D.T.; Bhandari, R.; Adamou, R. Hybrid off-grid renewable power system for sustainable rural electrification in Benin. Renew. Energy 2020, 145, 1266–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Thopil, M.S.; Bansal, R.C.; Zhang, L.; Sharma, G. A review of grid connected distributed generation using renewable energy sources in South Africa. Energy Strategy Rev. 2018, 21, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tuomela, S.; de Castro Tomé, M.; Iivari, N.; Svento, R. Impacts of home energy management systems on electricity consumption. Appl. Energy 2021, 299, 117310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Olawale, O.W.; Gilbert, B.; Reyna, J. Residential Demand Flexibility: Modeling Occupant Behavior using Sociodemographic Predictors. Energy Build. 2022, 262, 111973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. D’hulst, R.; Labeeuw, W.; Beusen, B.; Claessens, S.; Deconinck, G.; Vanthournout, K. Demand response flexibility and flexibility potential of residential smart appliances: Experiences from large pilot test in Belgium. Appl. Energy 2015, 155, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Stamminger, R.; Schmitz, A. Load profiles and flexibility in operation of washing machines and dishwashers in Europe. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2017, 41, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dortans, C.; Jack, M.W.; Anderson, B.; Stephenson, J. Lightening the load: Quantifying the potential for energy-efficient lighting to reduce peaks in electricity demand. Energy Effic. 2020, 13, 1105–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Utama, C.; Troitzsch, S.; Thakur, J. Demand-side flexibility and demand-side bidding for flexible loads in air-conditioned buildings. Appl. Energy 2021, 285, 116418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pan, Z.; Guo, Q.; Sun, H. Impacts of optimization interval on home energy scheduling for thermostatically controlled appliances. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2015, 1, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pied, M.; Anjos, M.F.; Malhamé, R.P. A flexibility product for electric water heater aggregators on electricity markets. Appl. Energy 2020, 280, 115168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Aduda, K.O.; Labeodan, T.; Zeiler, W. Towards critical performance considerations for using office buildings as a power flexibility resource-a survey. Energy Build. 2018, 159, 164–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Golmohamadi, H.; Keypour, R.; Bak-Jensen, B.; Radhakrishna Pillai, J. Optimization of household energy consumption towards day-ahead retail electricity price in home energy management systems. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 47, 101468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kuboth, S.; Heberle, F.; Weith, T.; Welzl, M.; König-Haagen, A.; Brüggemann, D. Experimental short-term investigation of model predictive heat pump control in residential buildings. Energy Build. 2019, 204, 109444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Golmohamadi, H. Stochastic energy optimization of residential heat pumps in uncertain electricity markets. Appl. Energy 2021, 303, 117629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Golmohamadi, H.; Larsen, K.G.; Jensen, P.G.; Hasrat, I.R. Hierarchical flexibility potentials of residential buildings with responsive heat pumps: A case study of Denmark. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 41, 102425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Emhofer, J.; Marx, K.; Sporr, A.; Barz, T.; Nitsch, B.; Wiesflecker, M.; Pink, W. Experimental demonstration of an air-source heat pump application using an integrated phase change material storage as a desuperheater for domestic hot water generation. Appl. Energy 2022, 305, 117890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, H.; Hou, J.; Tian, Z.; Hong, T.; Nord, N.; Rohde, D. Optimize heat prosumers’ economic performance under current heating price models by using water tank thermal energy storage. Energy 2022, 239, 122103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Golmohamadi, H.; Guldstrand Larsen, K.; Gjøl Jensen, P.; Riaz Hasrat, I. Optimization of power-to-heat flexibility for residential buildings in response to day-ahead electricity price. Energy Build. 2021, 232, 110665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ahmed, A.; Qayoum, A.; Mir, F.Q. Spectroscopic studies of renewable insulation materials for energy saving in building sector. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 103300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Golmohamadi, H.; Larsen, K.G. Economic heat control of mixing loop for residential buildings supplied by low-temperature district heating. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 46, 103286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Boodi, A.; Beddiar, K.; Amirat, Y.; Benbouzid, M. Building Thermal-Network Models: A Comparative Analysis, Recommendations, and Perspectives. Energies 2022, 15, 1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Brastein, O.M.; Ghaderi, A.; Pfeiffer, C.F.; Skeie, N.-O. Analysing uncertainty in parameter estimation and prediction for grey-box building thermal behaviour models. Energy Build. 2020, 224, 110236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Killian, M.; Mayer, B.; Kozek, M. Effective fuzzy black-box modeling for building heating dynamics. Energy Build. 2015, 96, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Golmohamadi, H. Data-Driven Approach to Forecast Heat Consumption of Buildings with High-Priority Weather Data. Buildings 2022, 12, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, S.; Xu, X. Parameter estimation of internal thermal mass of building dynamic models using genetic algorithm. Energy Convers. Manag. 2006, 47, 1927–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhou, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, J.; Niu, B.; Luo, M.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, X. Data-driven thermal comfort model via support vector machine algorithms: Insights from ASHRAE RP-884 database. Energy Build. 2020, 211, 109795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Golmohamadi, H.; Larsen, K.G.; Jensen, P.G.; Hasrat, I.R. Integration of flexibility potentials of district heating systems into electricity markets: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 159, 112200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Halvgaard, R.; Poulsen, N.K.; Madsen, H.; Jørgensen, J.B. Economic Model Predictive Control for building climate control in a Smart Grid. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA, 16–20 January 2012; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Clauß, J.; Stinner, S.; Sartori, I.; Georges, L. Predictive rule-based control to activate the energy flexibility of Norwegian residential buildings: Case of an air-source heat pump and direct electric heating. Appl. Energy 2019, 237, 500–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Marijanovic, Z.; Theile, P.; Czock, B. Value of short-term heating system flexibility—A case study for residential heat pumps on the German intraday market. Energy 2022, 249, 123664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Abokersh, M.H.; Saikia, K.; Cabeza, L.F.; Boer, D.; Vallès, M. Flexible heat pump integration to improve sustainable transition toward 4th generation district heating. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 225, 113379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Harild Rasmussen, T.B.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, M. Primary frequency support from local control of large-scale heat pumps. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 133, 107270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yu, T.; Kim, D.S.; Son, S.-Y. Optimization of scheduling for home appliances in conjunction with renewable and energy storage resources. Int. J. Smart Home 2013, 7, 261–272. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84883259313&partnerID=40&md5=6e48e1b22ff77efacfe8f401d2068a14 (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  103. Stadler, M.; Krause, W.; Sonnenschein, M.; Vogel, U. Modelling and evaluation of control schemes for enhancing load shift of electricity demand for cooling devices. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Adika, C.O.; Wang, L. Smart charging and appliance scheduling approaches to demand side management. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 57, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gottwalt, S.; Ketter, W.; Block, C.; Collins, J.; Weinhardt, C. Demand side management—A simulation of household behavior under variable prices. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 8163–8174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Shen, G.; Lee, Z.E.; Amadeh, A.; Zhang, K.M. A data-driven electric water heater scheduling and control system. Energy Build. 2021, 242, 110924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tejero-Gómez, J.A.; Bayod-Rújula, A.A. Energy management system design oriented for energy cost optimization in electric water heaters. Energy Build. 2021, 243, 111012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kapsalis, V.; Hadellis, L. Optimal operation scheduling of electric water heaters under dynamic pricing. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 31, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pereira, T.C.; Amaral Lopes, R.; Martins, J. Exploring the Energy Flexibility of Electric Water Heaters. Energies 2020, 13, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Finn, P.; O’Connell, M.; Fitzpatrick, C. Demand side management of a domestic dishwasher: Wind energy gains, financial savings and peak-time load reduction. Appl. Energy 2013, 101, 678–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ladenburg, J.; Jensen, K.L.; Lodahl, C.; Keles, D. Testing for non-linear willingness to accept compensation for controlled electricity switch-offs using choice experiments. Energy 2022, 238, 121749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Azizi, E.; Ahmadiahangar, R.; Rosin, A.; Martins, J.; Lopes, R.A.; Beheshti, M.T.H.; Bolouki, S. Residential energy flexibility characterization using non-intrusive load monitoring. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 75, 103321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Costanzo, G.T.; Zhu, G.; Anjos, M.F.; Savard, G. A System Architecture for Autonomous Demand Side Load Management in Smart Buildings. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2012, 3, 2157–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bozchalui, M.C.; Hashmi, S.A.; Hassen, H.; Canizares, C.A.; Bhattacharya, K. Optimal Operation of Residential Energy Hubs in Smart Grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2012, 3, 1755–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hassan, N.U.; Pasha, M.A.; Yuen, C.; Huang, S.; Wang, X. Impact of Scheduling Flexibility on Demand Profile Flatness and User Inconvenience in Residential Smart Grid System. Energies 2013, 6, 6608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Babaei, M.; Abazari, A.; Soleymani, M.M.; Ghafouri, M.; Muyeen, S.M.; Beheshti, M.T.H. A data-mining based optimal demand response program for smart home with energy storages and electric vehicles. J. Energy Storage 2021, 36, 102407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Tostado-Véliz, M.; León-Japa, R.S.; Jurado, F. Optimal electrification of off-grid smart homes considering flexible demand and vehicle-to-home capabilities. Appl. Energy 2021, 298, 117184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Borge-Diez, D.; Icaza, D.; Açıkkalp, E.; Amaris, H. Combined vehicle to building (V2B) and vehicle to home (V2H) strategy to increase electric vehicle market share. Energy 2021, 237, 121608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Golmohamadi, H.; Keypour, R.; Bak-Jensen, B.; Pillai, J.R.; Khooban, M.H. Robust Self-Scheduling of Operational Processes for Industrial Demand Response Aggregators. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2020, 67, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Aras Nejad, M.; Golmohamadi, H.; Bashian, A.; Mahmoodi, H.; Hammami, M. Application of Demand Response Programs to Heavy Industries: A Case Study on a Regional Electric Company. Int. J. Smart Electr. Eng. 2017, 6, 93–99. Available online: http://ijsee.iauctb.ac.ir/article_537456.html (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  121. Yao, M.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, N.; Duan, W.; Zhang, J. Low-carbon benefits analysis of energy-intensive industrial demand response resources for ancillary services. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2015, 3, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Zhang, X.; Hug, G.; Harjunkoski, I. Cost-Effective Scheduling of Steel Plants With Flexible EAFs. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2017, 8, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Alarfaj, O.; Bhattacharya, K. Material Flow Based Power Demand Modeling of an Oil Refinery Process for Optimal Energy Management. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 34, 2312–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Golmohamadi, H.; Asadi, A. Integration of Joint Power-Heat Flexibility of Oil Refinery Industries to Uncertain Energy Markets. Energies 2020, 13, 4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Summerbell, D.L.; Khripko, D.; Barlow, C.; Hesselbach, J. Cost and carbon reductions from industrial demand-side management: Study of potential savings at a cement plant. Appl. Energy 2017, 197, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ramin, D.; Spinelli, S.; Brusaferri, A. Demand-side management via optimal production scheduling in power-intensive industries: The case of metal casting process. Appl. Energy 2018, 225, 622–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Helin, K.; Käki, A.; Zakeri, B.; Lahdelma, R.; Syri, S. Economic potential of industrial demand side management in pulp and paper industry. Energy 2017, 141, 1681–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hasanbeigi, A.; Price, L. A review of energy use and energy efficiency technologies for the textile industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 3648–3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Seck, G.S.; Guerassimoff, G.; Maïzi, N. Heat recovery using heat pumps in non-energy intensive industry: Are Energy Saving Certificates a solution for the food and drink industry in France? Appl. Energy 2015, 156, 374–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ma, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Lv, J.; Ren, S. Data-driven sustainable intelligent manufacturing based on demand response for energy-intensive industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 123155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Otashu, J.I.; Baldea, M. Grid-level “battery” operation of chemical processes and demand-side participation in short-term electricity markets. Appl. Energy 2018, 220, 562–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Gholian, A.; Mohsenian-Rad, H.; Hua, Y.; Qin, J. Optimal industrial load control in smart grid: A case study for oil refineries. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 21–25 July 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  133. Seo, K.; Edgar, T.F.; Baldea, M. Optimal demand response operation of electric boosting glass furnaces. Appl. Energy 2020, 269, 115077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wierman, A.; Liu, Z.; Liu, I.; Mohsenian-Rad, H. Opportunities and challenges for data center demand response. In Proceedings of the International Green Computing Conference, Dallas, TX, USA, 3–5 November 2014; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Xu, W.; Zhou, D.; Huang, X.; Lou, B.; Liu, D. Optimal allocation of power supply systems in industrial parks considering multi-energy complementarity and demand response. Appl. Energy 2020, 275, 115407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pedersen, R.; Schwensen, J.; Biegel, B.; Green, T.; Stoustrup, J. Improving Demand Response Potential of a Supermarket Refrigeration System: A Food Temperature Estimation Approach. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2017, 25, 855–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wohlfarth, K.; Klobasa, M.; Gutknecht, R. Demand response in the service sector—Theoretical, technical and practical potentials. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Meschede, H. Analysis on the demand response potential in hotels with varying probabilistic influencing time-series for the Canary Islands. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 1480–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Akerma, M.; Hoang, H.M.; Leducq, D.; Flinois, C.; Clain, P.; Delahaye, A. Demand response in refrigerated warehouse. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Kansas City, MO, USA, 16–19 September 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yu, Z.; Lu, F.; Zou, Y.; Yang, X. Quantifying the flexibility of lighting systems by optimal control in commercial buildings: Insight from a case study. Energy Build. 2020, 225, 110310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Daryabari, M.K.; Keypour, R.; Golmohamadi, H. Stochastic energy management of responsive plug-in electric vehicles characterizing parking lot aggregators. Appl. Energy 2020, 279, 115751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Daryabari, M.K.; Keypour, R.; Golmohamadi, H. Robust self-scheduling of parking lot microgrids leveraging responsive electric vehicles. Appl. Energy 2021, 290, 116802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Golmohamadi, H.; Asadi, A. A multi-stage stochastic energy management of responsive irrigation pumps in dynamic electricity markets. Appl. Energy 2020, 265, 114804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Raza, F.; Tamoor, M.; Miran, S.; Arif, W.; Kiren, T.; Amjad, W.; Hussain, M.I.; Lee, G.-H. The Socio-Economic Impact of Using Photovoltaic (PV) Energy for High-Efficiency Irrigation Systems: A Case Study. Energies 2022, 15, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Golmohamadi, H. Operational scheduling of responsive prosumer farms for day-ahead peak shaving by agricultural demand response aggregators. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 938–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Aghajanzadeh, A.; Therkelsen, P. Agricultural demand response for decarbonizing the electricity grid. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Lim, T.; Baik, Y.-K.; Kim, D.D. Heating Performance Analysis of an Air-to-Water Heat Pump Using Underground Air for Greenhouse Farming. Energies 2020, 13, 3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Tong, Y.; Kozai, T.; Nishioka, N.; Ohyama, K. Reductions in Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions for Greenhouses Heated with Heat Pumps. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2012, 28, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Chiriboga, G.; Capelo, S.; Bunces, P.; Guzmán, C.; Cepeda, J.; Gordillo, G.; Montesdeoca, D.E.; Carvajal, C.G. Harnessing of geothermal energy for a greenhouse in Ecuador employing a heat pump: Design, construction, and feasibility assessment. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Zeyad, M.; Ahmed, S.M.M.; Hossain, E.; Anubhove, M.S.T.; Hasan, S.; Mahmud, D.M.; Islam, S. Optimization of a Solar PV Power Plant with Poultry Demand Side Management (PoDSM) for Poultry Farm. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE), Shillong, India, 1–3 December 2021; pp. 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Dew, J.J.W.; Jack, M.W.; Stephenson, J.; Walton, S. Reducing electricity demand peaks on large-scale dairy farms. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 25, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Theofanous, E.; Kythreotou, N.; Panayiotou, G.; Florides, G.; Vyrides, I. Energy production from piggery waste using anaerobic digestion: Current status and potential in Cyprus. Renew. Energy 2014, 71, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Jeong, M.G.; Rathnayake, D.; Mun, H.S.; Dilawar, M.A.; Park, K.W.; Lee, S.R.; Yang, C.J. Effect of a Sustainable Air Heat Pump System on Energy Efficiency, Housing Environment, and Productivity Traits in a Pig Farm. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Classification of flexibility application in household electricity consumption.
Table 1. Classification of flexibility application in household electricity consumption.
Household AppliancesFlexibility TargetsRef.
Thermostatically Controlled Appliances
TCAs
Heat Pump(1) Reduction of energy costs for heating of household buildings
(2) Reduction of annual emission (CO2)
(3) Reduction of energy consumption for heating system during peak hours
[98]
Maximizing profit of buildings through trading flexibility in intraday markets[99]
(1) Minimization of life cycle cost
(2) Reduction of environmental impacts of heat pumps and district heating
[100]
Improving power system frequency control[101]
Refrigerator(1) Minimization of household electricity bill
(2) Reduction of peak load
[102]
Load shifting of electrical demand using cooling devices[103]
(1) Minimize electricity consumption cost of households
(2) Regulation of peak demand in power systems
[104]
(1) Cost saving of smart household appliances
(2) Providing residential load for shifting to help balance demand and supply
[105]
Electric Water Heater(1) Minimization of electricity cost under TOU
(2) Satisfying the comfort water temperature within the predefined bound
[106]
Minimization of cost function under Spanish electricity price tariff[107]
(1) Minimization of energy cost under day-ahead and real-time pricing
(2) Maximization of residents’ comfort
[108]
Cost saving for household to remote control electric water heater[109]
Non-Thermostatically Controlled Appliances
Non-TCAs
Wet
Appliances
(1) Minimization of energy cost
(2) Maximization of renewable energy demand
(3) Minimization of carbon emission
[110]
Proposing compensation contract to increase flexibility of wet appliances[111]
Harness energy flexibility of buildings to flatten demand consumption [112]
Providing load balancing for power system and minimizing the energy cost[113]
(1) Minimizing energy consumption
(2) Reduction of emission and environmental impacts
(3) Reduction of peak demand
[114]
(1) Flattening of peak demand
(2) Meeting residents’ convenience
[115]
Private ParkingVehicle-to-Home (V2H)(1) Increase energy efficiency of homes
(2) Improvement of energy consumption pattern
(3) Shift of peak demand
[116]
(1) Increase electrification of off-grid smart homes
(2) Reduction of investment cost on the electronification
[117]
(1) Reduction of building peak demand
(2) Increase profit of household
(3) Reduction of emission production
[118]
Table 2. Flexibility potentials in some heavy industries.
Table 2. Flexibility potentials in some heavy industries.
IndustryKey Objective(s)Ref.
Cement Manufacturing(1) Cost reduction
(2) Emission reduction
(3) Reduction of electricity cost
[125]
Metal Smelting Industry(1) Providing reserve for electricity market
(2) Minimization of operation cost
(3) Integration of flexibility into capacity market
[126]
Pulp and PaperProviding up-regulation for power markets[127]
Textile IndustryEnergy- and cost-saving measures in industrial processes[128]
Food/Drink Industry(1) Reduction of energy consumption
(2) Reduction of emission production
(3) Facilitate use of heat pumps in the industry
[129]
Ceramics Industry(1) Optimize energy cost
(2) Increase energy efficiency
(3) The industrial DRPs benefit the environment, economy, society
[130]
Chemical Industry(1) Improving grid operation, e.g., reliability, resilience
(2) Making profit in the industry
[131]
Oil Refinery IndustriesProviding industrial load control in smart-grid operation[132]
Glass Manufacturing(1) Making balance for power and gas
(2) Reduction of energy consumption cost
(3) Reduction of strain on power grids
[133]
Data Centers(1) Facilitate the integration of renewable energies to power grids
(2) Providing peak-load shaving
[134]
Industrial Parks and Zones(1) Optimization of investment cost on industrial parks
(2) Prevent imbalance of energy shifting
[135]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Golmohamadi, H. Demand-Side Flexibility in Power Systems: A Survey of Residential, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural Sectors. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137916

AMA Style

Golmohamadi H. Demand-Side Flexibility in Power Systems: A Survey of Residential, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural Sectors. Sustainability. 2022; 14(13):7916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137916

Chicago/Turabian Style

Golmohamadi, Hessam. 2022. "Demand-Side Flexibility in Power Systems: A Survey of Residential, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural Sectors" Sustainability 14, no. 13: 7916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137916

APA Style

Golmohamadi, H. (2022). Demand-Side Flexibility in Power Systems: A Survey of Residential, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural Sectors. Sustainability, 14(13), 7916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137916

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop