Next Article in Journal
Characterisation of Mg-Al Hydrotalcite and Surfactant-Modified Bentonite Nano Clays for the Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Mixing Chamber Configuration and Submersion Depth on Centrifugal Aerator Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Impact Analysis of Oil and Gas Pipe Repair Techniques Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytoremediation of Composite Industrial Effluent using Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn): A Lab-Scale Experimental Investigation

1
Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
2
Agro-Ecology and Pollution Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology and Environmental Science, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar 249404, Uttarakhand, India
3
Biology Department, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia
4
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt
5
Biology Department, Faculty of Science and Arts, King Khalid University, Mohail Assir 61321, Saudi Arabia
6
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Aswan University, Aswan 81528, Egypt
7
Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, University of Ilorin, Ilorin PMB 1515, Nigeria
8
Department of Agricultural Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
9
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Svetosimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
10
Department of Environment Science, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun 248002, Uttarakhand, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9500; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159500
Submission received: 3 July 2022 / Revised: 27 July 2022 / Accepted: 31 July 2022 / Published: 2 August 2022

Abstract

:
This study investigates the phytoremediation of composite industrial effluent (CIE) released from multiple industries within the SIIDCUL cluster, Haridwar, India, using the sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn) plant. Batch-mode phytoremediation experiments were conducted using three selected concentrations (0%: borewell water as control, 50%, and 100%) of CIE for 45 days. Results show that the N. nucifera plant significantly reduced loads of physicochemical and heavy metal pollutants of CIE. In particular, the maximal removal of total dissolved solids (TDS: 89.56%), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD: 78.20%), chemical oxygen demand (COD: 79.41%), total Kjeldahl’s nitrogen (TKN: 86.48%), phosphorus (P: 76.37%), cadmium (Cd: 70.37%), copper (Cu: 85.82%), chromium (Cr: 68.61%), iron (Fe: 72.86%), lead (Pb: 76.92%), and zinc (Zn: 74.51%) pollutants was noted in the 50% CIE concentration treatment. Heavy metal bioaccumulation and translocation factor values (>1) for root and leaf parts show that the N. nucifera plant was a hyperaccumulator. However, the contents of heavy metals were higher in the root than the leaf part of the N. nucifera plant. Moreover, the selected plant growth attributes such as fresh plant biomass (760.70 ± 8.77 g/plant; without flowers), chlorophyll content (4.30 ± 0.22 mg/g fwt.), plant height (154.05 ± 4.55 cm), root length (70.35 ± 2.42 cm), leaf spread (41.58 ± 0.26 cm), number of leaves (10.00 ± 1.00 per plant), and number of flowers (16.00 ± 2.00) were also maximal in the 50% CIE concentration. This study provides a sustainable approach towards the effective biotreatment of noxious mixed effluent using plant-based green technology.

1. Introduction

Recent developments in human civilization have contributed to drastically increasing the global population, thereby creating new settlements. New industries are being established to create needful articles for humans, which are continuously increasing day by day [1,2]. However, increasing amounts of solid, semisolid, gaseous, and liquid waste are being released from these industrial activities, rendering them the greatest threat to our environment. Such industries include pharmaceuticals, food and beverages, paper and pulp manufacturing, paper mill, distillery, petrochemicals, oil, and refineries [3]. Wastes released from the industrial sectors contain high loads of organic and inorganic pollutants such as excessive nutrients, heavy metals, radionuclides, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), plastics, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [4]. Additionally, heavy metals are conservatively well-defined as elements with metallic properties (ductility, conductivity, stability as cations, ligand specificity, etc.). The most common heavy metals responsible for environmental degradation are cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn). These pollutants create disturbances in ecological functioning, and affect both living and nonliving components [5]. Despite recent advancements in industrial effluent disposal strategies, it is estimated that, out of the total generated effluent, only 20% is adequately or partially treated before open disposal [6]. In particular, low- or middle-income countries show higher socioeconomic inequalities in terms of industrial effluent management plans and policies than those of developed and high-income countries [7]. Therefore, the proper treatment and disposal of these effluents are challenging and in high demand, especially in developing countries such as India.
For the rapid development and fulfillment of human needs, governments are creating clustered industrial sectors containing several operational units located in a specified area. In India, major clustered industrial hubs include Mumbai-Pune, the Hugli, Bangalore, Gujarat, Chotanagpur, Vishakhapatnam-Guntur, Gurgaon-Delhi-Meerut, Kollam-Thiruvananthapuram, and Haridwar-Dehradun, which contain thousands of operational industrial units [8]. The management of huge effluent generated from such hubs is challenging due to their varied physicochemical characteristics. The State Infrastructure and Industrial Development Corporation of Uttarakhand Limited (SIIDCUL) in the Haridwar district occupies an area of about 2034 acres with nearly 700 industries in operation. The effluent produced from SIIDCUL industrial cluster is released into a passing channel (seasonal canal) before it is partially treated inside the common effluent treatment facility. Due to the huge volume of produced composite industrial effluent (CIE), a major portion is discharged without adequate treatment, thereby causing a serious environmental menace in the vicinity [9]. Therefore, the efficient treatment of CIE in the Haridwar district has become a matter of serious concern. Out of the several techniques used for industrial wastewater treatment, phytoremediation technology has appeared as an emerging technology of environmental restoration that uses plants to remediate harmful pollutants from contaminated soil, air, and water [10,11]. Several aquatic plant species such as Azolla pinnata, Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes, Trapa natans, Chrysopogon zizanioides, Lemna sp., Typha latifolia, and Nelumbo nucifera have the potential for wastewater treatment due to their genetic compatibility toward certain toxic pollutants. These plants are capable of growing in contaminated water bodies having high pollutant loads, thus facilitating their natural cleanup [12,13]. N. nucifera Gaertn. is an aquatic macrophyte belonging to the Nelumbonaceae family. It is commonly known as the sacred lotus or Indian lotus, and is found in ponds and lakes with excessive nutrient load. It is native to north–central India up to an altitude of 1400 m. N. nucifera is widely grown in artificial ponds for aesthetic purposes, and also for its flowers, seeds, stems, and submerged roots [14]. The flowers and seeds of N. nucifera have several beneficial and biochemical constituents, and are thereby sold to medicine manufacturers [15]. N. nucifera has remarkable potential to grow in temperate regions (30–35 °C), and may, therefore, help in cleaning the contaminated water bodies of these regions. Several varieties of the lotus are available for cultivation such as seed lotus, flower lotus, pips, stems, and rhizomes. Several studies have also reported that N. nucifera is an ideal candidate for the phytoremediation of different types of wastewater, including domestic, industrial, and synthetic, rendering it an ideal candidate for phytoremediation purposes [16]. Till now, no study has reported the utilization of the sacred lotus (N. nucifera) plant for the phytoremediation of CIE. Considering the aforementioned, the present study explores the use of the N. nucifera plant in the batch-mode phytoremediation of CIE released from the SIIDCUL industrial cluster of Haridwar, India. Moreover, the reduction in and accumulation of various physicochemical and heavy metal pollutants of CIE were investigated to study the concentration-dependent performance of N. nucifera.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Experimental Materials

For the present study, juvenile plants of sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn) were collected from a local pond of Jamalpur Kalan Village, Haridwar, India (29°54′05.4″ N and 78°07′20.6″ E). Farmers were asked to collect N. nucifera plants that had a healthy root system (Figure 1). On the other hand, the composite industrial effluent (CIE) of the State Infrastructure and Industrial Development Corporation of Uttarakhand (SIIDCUL) was collected from the effluent discharge channel near Bharat Heavy Electric Limited (BHEL) township, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India (29°56′19.3″ N and 78°05′03.4″ E). The CIE samples were collected in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) containers of 50 L capacity and immediately transported to the laboratory for further experimentation.

2.2. Experimental Design for Phytoremediation Experiments

Before initiating the phytoremediation experiments, the N. nucifera plants were carefully acclimatized in the aquatic macrophytes pond of the Multipurpose Experimental Area (MEA) of the Department of Zoology and Environmental Science, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, India (29°55′10.2″ N and 78°07′08.8″ E). Plastic tubs of 25 L capacity were filled with a total of 20 L of the working volume of CIE. Three different treatments of CIE viz., Control (20 L borewell water), 50% (10 L CIE + 10 L borewell water), and 100% (20 L absolute CIE), were used to conduct the phytoremediation experiments. The tub was prefilled with 2 kg of garden soil, and the root of one healthy N. nucifera plant was submerged completely in it. Afterward, the tub was filled with 20 L borewell water and left for 24 h until the water became clear. Lastly, the borewell water was carefully drained, and tubs were filled carefully with different treatments of CIE without disturbing the soil surface. The phytoremediation experiments lasted for 45 days until the growth of the plants had become stationary. Figure 2 shows different experimental steps adopted in the current study.

2.3. Chemical and Instrumental Analyses

In this study, the borewell water and CIE were analyzed for the selected physicochemical and heavy metal parameters, namely, pH, electrical conductivity (EC: dS/m), total dissolved solids (TDS: mg/L), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD: mg/L), chemical oxygen demand (COD: mg/L), total Kjeldahl’s nitrogen (TKN: mg/L), phosphorus (P: mg/L), cadmium (Cd: mg/L), copper (Cu: mg/L), chromium (Cr: mg/L), iron (Fe: mg/L), lead (Pb: mg/L), and zinc (Zn: mg/L). For this purpose, standard methodologies recommended by APHA [17] and AOAC [18] were adopted. The N. nucifera plant biomass was also analyzed for the selected heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Cr, Fe, Pb, and Zn) and biochemical parameters (chlorophyll content: mg/g fresh weight basis). Specifically, pH, EC, and TDS were measured using a pre-calibrated meter (1611, ESICO, Parwanoo, India). The BOD5 was determined using Winkler’s dissolved oxygen method, while COD was determined by using open reflux-K2Cr2O7 digestion followed by spectroscopic measurement (60 Cary, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) [19]. Similarly, TKN was determined by following Kjeldahl’s acid digestion and distillation method as described in a previous study [20]. The contents of heavy metals were determined using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS: A-Analyst 800, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) after digesting 10 mL of water or CIE sample in a diacid mixture (HNO3:HClO4; 3:1) placed on a hot plate for 1 h. On the other hand, 1 g of plant biomass was predigested (12 h) using 5 mL of the diacid mixture followed by hot-plate digestion. The heavy metal analysis of plant biomass was performed in the same way as in the case of water samples. The contents of chlorophyll in the fresh leaves of the N. nucifera plant were also determined by following 80% acetone extraction followed by spectroscopic measurement [21]. The other plant growth and morphological parameters were also determined by using calibrated digital weighing and measuring scales.

2.4. Data Analysis and Software

The efficiency of the N. nucifera plants in terms of removal of pollutants from CIE was depicted using the removal efficiency index. The index represents the aggregated difference between the initial and final parameter values [20]. The percentage removal efficiency was calculated using Equation (1):
Removal   efficiency   ( % ) = ( I F I ) × 100
where I and F represent the initial and final pollutant concentrations in the CIE, respectively. The heavy metal uptake efficiency of the N. nucifera plants was also exhibited using bioaccumulation and translocation factors. Bioaccumulation factor (BCF) is the proportion of the concentration of a chemical in the plant to the chemical concentration medium, and expressed as liter units per kilogram (ratio of mg of chemical to mg of chemical per kg of plant per liter of effluent medium). The BCF was calculated by using Equation (2) [22]:
Bioaccumulation   factor   ( Bf ) = C plant C effluent
where Cplant is the metal concentration in the plant sample (mg/kg; dry weight basis), while Ceffluent is the metal concentration in the CIE medium (mg/L). Similarly, the translocation factor helps in screening the hyperaccumulator plant species for suitability in the phytoextraction of heavy metals. Generally, TF values greater than 1 indicate the strong translocation of heavy metals to the aerial parts of the plant. To evaluate the potential of phytoextraction, the translocation factor (TF) was calculated by using Equation (3) [23].
Translocation   factor   ( T f ) = C a C r
where Ca is the heavy metal concentration in the aerial parts of the plant, and Cr is the heavy metal concentration in the root parts of the plant as mg/kg (dry weight basis).
All the experiments were conducted as six replicates, and values are presented as mean followed by standard deviation. The significant difference between the treatment groups and treatment days was evaluated on the basis of a single-tailed (unpaired) Student’s t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlation, and principal component analysis (PCA) tests. The level of statistical significance was adjusted to a 95% confident interval (p < 0.05) for all tests. Microsoft Excel (Version 2019, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, DC, USA) and OriginPro (Version 2022a, Student edition, OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA) software packages were used for data analysis and visualization.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Pollution Load of Composite Industrial Effluent Used in This Study

The single-tailed Student’s t-test showed a significant (p < 0.05) difference between all the tested physicochemical characteristics of borewell water and CIE, as shown in Table 1. It was also evidenced that most of the parameters of CIE were beyond the standard limit of surface water discharge except for TKN, Cd, Cu, and Pb, as prescribed by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) of India. Thus, CIE has a higher pollution load and should not be disposed of directly into the effluent channel without proper treatment. The higher pollution load of CIE was likely due to the cluster of diverse industries operating collectively in this region. The presence of different heavy metals in CIE might be due to the operation of different manufacturing units such as electroplating, agrochemical, food processing, pharmaceuticals, food, and beverages, cosmetics, commercial complexes, and workshops, which frequently release their mixed-type effluents in the common effluent channel of the SIIDCUL.
These findings were supported by the results of Shalini et al. [24], who evaluated the different parameters of CIE and noted values in the range of 2.42–7.81 for pH, 0.45 mS/m for EC, 1.00–602 mg/L for TSS, 280–6950 mg/L for TDS, 281–7035 mg/L for TS, 0.03–1.17 mg/L for Pb, 0.06–0.13 mg/L for Cr, 0.04 mg/L for Fe, and 0.11–1.65 mg/L for Mn. Moreover, Kumar and Thakur [25] analyzed various parameters of the CIE and reported that the values of heavy metals were in the range of 1.50–1.65 mg/L for Cr, 2.71–2.84 mg/L for Cd, 1.42–1.56 mg/L for Cu, 2.04–2.45 mg/L for Fe, 1.02–1.26 mg/L for Mn, 0.42–0.50 mg/L for Zn. Thus, previous studies have shown that the CIE had a considerable load of different pollutants that need to be treated before its disposal in the effluent channel.

3.2. Reduction of Pollution Load by Sacred Lotus (N. nucifera)

After the phytoremediation experiments, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the pollution load of CIE was achieved, as shown in Table 2. However, the highest removal of all parameters was observed using 50% CIE concentration, followed by 100% and control CIE treatments. Figure 3 shows the assessment of pollutant removal efficiencies among the selected experimental treatments. In particular, the maximal removal efficiency of the selected physicochemical parameters was noted as TDS (89.56%), BOD (78.20%), COD (79.41%), TKN (86.48%), and P (76.37%), respectively. Similarly, the contents of the removal of heavy metals also significantly (p < 0.05) declined after the termination of phytoremediation experiments, where maximal removal efficiency was achieved as Cd (70.37%), Cu (85.82%), Cr (68.61%), Fe (72.86%), Pb (76.92%), and Zn (74.51%), respectively. The maximal removal of these pollutants in 50% CIE concentration might have been because absolute (100%) CIE had a high pollution load, which may not be feasible for N. nucifera plant growth. Similarly, the control treatment showed minimal removal due to the lesser availability of nutrients, which led to slower plant growth. Hyperaccumulator macrophytes such as N. nucifera are well-known for their capabilities to recycle nutrients within the aquatic bodies [26]. The physiological and metabolic adaptations of these plants allow for them to capture certain organic and inorganic pollutants that act as their primary nutrients, thereby cleaning the aquatic bodies through natural pathways [27]. These exceptional properties of aquatic macrophytes render them ideal candidates for the phytoremediation of industrial effluents such as CIE.
Although the N. nucifera plant is widely investigated for its phytoremediation potential in previous studies, it has not been explored for the biotreatment of mixed-type effluents such as CIE. In their study, Thongtha et al. [28] performed phytoremediation experiments for the biotreatment of domestic wastewater using the N. nucifera plant, and found that the loads of pH, EC, TDS, BOD, COD, and TP were significantly reduced after five consecutive cycles of 25 days. Similarly, Mishra [29] also investigated the Cd and Cu reduction efficiency of N. nucifera from a synthetically prepared solution, and reported about 87–96% Cu and 65–85% Cd reduction in the 7 days of the incubation period. Moreover, a study by Kumar et al. [26] investigated the heavy metal removal potential of N. nucifera plants found in Pariyej Community Reserve Lake in Gujarat, India. They reported that N. nucifera had the potential to eradicate the contents of Cd, Cu, Co, Ni, Pb, and Zn. Abd Rasid et al. [30] also investigated the efficiency of N. nucifera for the treatment of domestic wastewater, and found that BOD, COD, and turbidity were reported as 97.10%, 55.00%, and 88.80%, respectively. Hence, the findings reported in these studies are in line with those obtained in the current study on reducing the pollution load of CIE using the N. nucifera plant.

3.3. Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals by Sacred Lotus (N. nucifera)

Table 3 depicts the results of heavy metal concentration in N. nucifera plant tissues (roots and leaves) before and after phytoremediation. The contents of the selected heavy metals in the N. nucifera plant were significantly (p < 0.05) increased after CIE treatment. The decreasing order of heavy metal accumulation was Fe > Zn > Cu > Pb > Cr > Cd for both the root and leaf parts of the N. nucifera plant. In particular, the maximal contents of the selected heavy metals in the root and leaf parts of N. nucifera were Cd (0.73 ± 0.06 and 0.75 ± 0.02 mg/kg), Cu (4.95 ± 0.04 and 5.14 ± 0.01 mg/kg), Cr (4.42 ± 0.96 and 4.69 ± 0.11 mg/kg), Fe (28.00 ± 0.99 and 29.96 ± 0.43 mg/kg), Pb (4.47 ± 0.01 and 4.85 ± 0.02 mg/kg), and Zn (16.13 ± 0.47 and 17.34 ± 1.06 mg/kg), respectively. The accumulation patterns were in line with the pollution removal capacity where 50% CIE treatment showed the maximal accumulation of heavy metals. Comparatively, the root parts of the N. nucifera exhibited a greater accumulation of Fe and Cr, while Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb were mostly accumulated in the leaf part of the plant. This might have been due to the induced toxicity of Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb in the root of aquatic macrophytes, which damages the plant root system by altering the plant physiology and disrupting the biochemical mechanism [9,11]. BCF values for all heavy metals were also >1, indicating the strong bioaccumulation properties of the N. nucifera plant. However, the leaf parts of the N. nucifera showed high BCF values compared to those of the leaf part. Similarly, TF (>1) values also suggested that the plant had a good affinity for translocating the heavy metals from its root part to the leaf part. The highest accumulation of heavy metals from 50% CIE treatment might have been due to their favorable concentration within the medium that allowed for efficient uptake by the N. nucifera plant.
In this, Cu, Fe, Cr, and Mn are trace elements essentially taken by higher plant root systems for efficient growth, whereas Cd and Pb might also be absorbed as a substitute for other elements. However, Cd and Pb are highly toxic metals that negatively affect plant growth and that are still widely accumulated to create a chemical equilibrium for efficient survival in metal-stressed environments. Therefore, Cd and Pb contents present in CIE were accumulated by N. nucifera plants in the current study while their actual functions were unknown. Very limited studies are available on the phytoaccumulation of heavy metals by N. nucifera in wastewater treatment [31]. Mishra [29] found that the N. nucifera plant accumulated up to 1.10 and 0.41 mg/g of Cd, and 1.70 and 0.41 mg/g of Cu in its root and leaf parts, respectively, when grown in aqueous solutions. Moreover, Ashraf et al. [32] found that the sacred lotus had good accumulation properties, particularly for Pb, Cu, and Zn elements. Similarly, Ashraf et al. [33] also studied the heavy metal uptake potential of N. nucifera from selected lake sites of Bestari Jaya, Malaysia. They reported that N. nucifera had a significant accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn, where BCF values reached 0.30, 0.33, and 0.24, respectively.

3.4. Changes in Plant Growth Attributes of Sacred Lotus (N. nucifera)

In this study, CIE had various nutrients, including macro and micronutrients, which played an important role in the growth of N. nucifera plants. After the phytoremediation experiments, significant (p < 0.05) improvement was observed in the selected plant growth attributes of N. nucifera (Table 4). Since the utmost factor altering the growth and development of the plants is the accessibility of the nutrients (in the form of contaminations) within its growing medium, 50% CIE treatment showed the maximal increment in fresh plant biomass (760.70 ± 8.77 g/plant; without flowers), chlorophyll content (4.30 ± 0.22 mg/g fwt.), plant height (154.05 ± 4.55 cm), root length (70.35 ± 2.42 cm), leaf spread (41.58 ± 0.26 cm), number of leaves (10.00 ± 1.00 per plant), and number of flowers (16.00 ± 2.00). Additionally, the flower yield in the 50% treatment was more than twofold that of the control treatment. Though the plant growth attributes increased from control to 50% CIE treatment, absolute CIE loading showed a decline parallel to the pollutant removal efficiency. On the other hand, Pearson correlation studies revealed that CIE loading had a significant positive relationship with all growth traits of N. nucifera, as given in Figure 4a. Similarly, the PCA biplot (Figure 4b) also showed that CIE had the highest positive influence on fresh plant biomass followed by leaf spread, the number of flowers, and plant height. Plants respond to external nutrient stress, which might be a reason behind the lesser growth of sacred lotus in 100% CIE treatment. The plants were able to adapt efficiently in the 50% treatment, which resulted in efficient chlorophyll activities and thereby high biomass production. Previous studies have shown that N. nucifera has high growth rates and can spread over water bodies within a short period [34]. However, the attributed growth largely depended on the nutrient bioavailability.
Previous studies showed that many varieties of N. nucifera can be grown for agri-business. The plant may achieve a height of 190 cm, where the numbers of flowers and fruits were in the ranges of 10–15 and 30–52, respectively [35]. A report by Wang et al. [16] showed that oxidative stress induced by Cd disrupted the defense system of the N. nucifera, which resulted in lesser chlorophyll production compared to the control treatment. They found that the relative leaf area was also significantly reduced under high Cd stress, which supported the results of the current study regarding lower values of leaf spread. Similarly, in a study conducted by Obando [36], N. nucifera showed decreased plant growth response under high Mn load in terms of lower seedling biomass and chlorophyll contents. Therefore, CIE loading had a significant effect on plant growth and biochemical attributes of N. nucifera, where 50% concentration was identified as the best treatment for phytoremediation purposes.

4. Conclusions

The findings of this study showed that composite industrial effluent (CIE) of the SIIDCUL complex (Haridwar, India) had significant loads of physicochemical and heavy metal pollutants. After the termination of phytoremediation experiments, the sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) plant was able to reduce these pollutants most efficiently by using a 50% concentration treatment of CIE. Moreover, heavy metal accumulation studies showed that N. nucifera was identified as a hyperaccumulator macrophyte as revealed by bioaccumulation and translocation factor values (>1). Therefore, considering the problem of mixed-type industrial effluents like CIE in Haridwar, N. nucifera might be an ideal candidate for its sustainable management. Further studies on the phytochemical characterization and management of the harvested biomass of N. nucifera plant are highly recommended.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.K. (Piyush Kumar), P.K. (Pankaj Kumar) and V.K.; formal analysis, P.K. (Piyush Kumar); funding acquisition, A.A.A.-H., M.A.T. and I.Š.; investigation, P.K. (Piyush Kumar); methodology, P.K. (Piyush Kumar) and P.K. (Pankaj Kumar); project administration, E.M.E. and V.K.; resources, V.K.; software, P.K. (Pankaj Kumar); supervision, V.K.; validation, A.A.A.-H., E.M.E., M.A.T., B.A., Ž.A., B.M., V.D., A.B., J.S., V.K. and I.Š.; visualization, P.K. (Pankaj Kumar); writing—original draft, P.K. (Piyush Kumar), P.K. (Pankaj Kumar) and V.K.; writing—review and editing, A.A.A.-H., E.M.E., M.A.T., B.A., Ž.A., B.M., V.D., A.B., J.S. and I.Š. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by King Khalid University through the Research Group Project under grant number RGP. 1/7/43, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. This research was funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R93), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to their host institutes for providing the necessary facilities to conduct this study. The authors extend their appreciation to King Khalid University for funding this work through the Research Group Project under grant number RGP. 1/7/43, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. The authors express their gratitude to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R93), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All individuals included in this section have consented to the acknowledgment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shah, S.N.; Manzoor, S.; Asim, M. Impact of Industrial Pollution on Our Society. Pak. J. Sci. 2021, 73, 222–229. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nisal, A.; Diwekar, U.; Hanumante, N.; Shastri, Y.; Cabezas, H. Integrated Model for Food-Energy-Water (FEW) Nexus to Study Global Sustainability: The Main Generalized Global Sustainability Model (GGSM). PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0267403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shahbaz, M.; Bashir, M.F.; Bashir, M.A.; Shahzad, L. A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review of Tourism-Environmental Degradation Nexus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 58241–58257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Palani, G.; Arputhalatha, A.; Kannan, K.; Lakkaboyana, S.K.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Kumar, V.; Marella, R.K. Current Trends in the Application of Nanomaterials for the Removal of Pollutants from Industrial Wastewater Treatment—A Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mushtaq, N.; Singh, D.V.; Bhat, R.A.; Dervash, M.A.; Hameed, O.B. Freshwater Contamination: Sources and Hazards to Aquatic Biota. In Fresh Water Pollution Dynamics and Remediation; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 27–50. [Google Scholar]
  6. The World Bank. Wastewater a Resource That Can Pay Dividends for People, the Environment, and Economies, Says World Bank; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoque, A.; Mohiuddin, M.; Su, Z. Effects of Industrial Operations on Socio-Environmental and Public Health Degradation: Evidence from a Least Developing Country (LDC). Sustainability 2018, 10, 3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kumar, V.; Kumar, P.; Singh, J.; Kumar, P. Current Status of Water Pollution by Integrated Industrial Hubs (IIHs) in India. Environ. Degrad. Causes Remediat. Strateg. 2020, 1, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, V.; Thakur, R.K.; Kumar, P. Assessment of Heavy Metals Uptake by Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea Var. Botrytis) Grown in Integrated Industrial Effluent Irrigated Soils: A Prediction Modeling Study. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 257, 108682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhat, S.A.; Bashir, O.; Ul Haq, S.A.; Amin, T.; Rafiq, A.; Ali, M.; Américo-Pinheiro, J.H.P.; Sher, F. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals in Soil and Water: An Eco-Friendly, Sustainable and Multidisciplinary Approach. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nwogwu, N.A.; Ajala, O.A.; Ajibade, F.O.; Ajibade, T.F.; Adelodun, B.; Lasisi, K.H.; Ugya, A.Y.; Kumar, P.; Omotade, I.F.; Babalola, T.E.; et al. Phytoremediation Mechanisms of Heavy Metal Removal: A Step Towards a Green and Sustainable Environment. In Innovative Bio-Based Technologies for Environmental Remediation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 207–236. [Google Scholar]
  12. Galal, T.M.; Eid, E.M.; Dakhil, M.A.; Hassan, L.M. Bioaccumulation and Rhizofiltration Potential of Pistia stratiotes L. for Mitigating Water Pollution in the Egyptian Wetlands. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2018, 20, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yildiz Töre, G.; Özkoç, Ö.B. Recent Developments in Aquatic Macrophytes for Environmental Pollution Control: A Case Study on Heavy Metal Removal from Lake Water and Agricultural Return Wastewater with the Use of Duckweed (Lemnacea). In Phytoremediation Technology for the Removal of Heavy Metals and Other Contaminants from Soil and Water; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 75–127. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mekbib, Y.; Huang, S.X.; Ngarega, B.K.; Li, Z.Z.; Shi, T.; Ou, K.F.; Liang, Y.T.; Chen, J.M.; Yang, X.Y. The Level of Genetic Diversity and Differentiation of Tropical Lotus, Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. (Nelumbonaceae) from Australia, India, and Thailand. Bot. Stud. 2020, 61, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gowthami, R.; Sharma, N.; Pandey, R.; Agrawal, A. A Model for Integrated Approach to Germplasm Conservation of Asian Lotus (Nelumbo Nucifera Gaertn.). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2021, 68, 1269–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Yuan, M.; Li, Z.; Niu, Y.; Jin, Q.; Zhu, B.; Xu, Y. Effects of Ethylene Biosynthesis and Signaling on Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense System in Nelumbo nucifera G. under Cadmium Exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 40156–40170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. APHA, A. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Latimer, G.W. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 21st ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shashibhushana, H.S.; Lokeshappa, B. Pollutant Removal Potential of Single-Size Root Zone Media Using Vetiveria Zizanioides as Emergent Macrophyte and Its Validation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 7911–7920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, P.; Eid, E.M.; Taher, M.A.; El-Morsy, M.H.E.; Osman, H.E.M.; Al-Bakre, D.A.; Adelodun, B.; Abou Fayssal, S.; Andabaka, Ž.; Goala, M.; et al. Sustainable Upcycling of Mushroom Farm Wastewater through Cultivation of Two Water Ferns (Azolla Spp.) in Stagnant and Flowing Tank Reactors. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jayasri, M.A.; Suthindhiran, K. Effect of Zinc and Lead on the Physiological and Biochemical Properties of Aquatic Plant Lemna minor: Its Potential Role in Phytoremediation. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ismail, N.‘I.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Idris, M.; Hasan, H.A.; Halmi, M.I.E.; al Sbani, N.H.; Jehawi, O.H. Simultaneous Bioaccumulation and Translocation of Iron and Aluminium from Mining Wastewater by Scirpus grossus. Desalination Water Treat. 2019, 163, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kobaissi, A.N.; Kanso, A.A.; Kanbar, H.J. Translocation of Heavy Metals in Zea Mays L. Treated with Wastewater and Consequences on Morphophysiological Aspects. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 2014, 30, 297–305. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shalini; Sharma, P.K.; Naithani, P. Effect of Industrial Effluent on the Groundwater Quality in Haridwar. J. Graph. Era Univ. 2018, 6, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar, V.; Thakur, R.K. Pollution Load of SIDCUL Effluent with Reference to Heavy Metals Accumulated in Sediments Using Pollution Load Index (PLI) and Geo-Accumulation Index (I-Geo) at Haridwar (Uttarakhand), India. J. Environ. Biosci. 2017, 31, 163–168. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rai, P.K. Heavy Metal Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystems and Its Phytoremediation Using Wetland Plants: An Ecosustainable Approach. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2008, 10, 133–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ojuederie, O.B.; Babalola, O.O. Microbial and Plant-Assisted Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Environments: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Thongtha, S.; Teamkao, P.; Boonapatcharoen, N.; Tripetchkul, S.; Techkarnjararuk, S.; Thiravetyan, P. Phosphorus Removal from Domestic Wastewater by Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. and Cyperus alternifolius L. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 137, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mishra, V.; Pathak, V.; Tripathi, B. Accumulation of Cadmium and Copper from Aqueous Solutions Using Indian Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). Ambio 2009, 38, 110–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Abd Rasid, N.S.; Naim, M.N.; Che Man, H.; Abu Bakar, N.F.; Mokhtar, M.N. Evaluation of Surface Water Treated with Lotus Plant; Nelumbo nucifera. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sreekumar, V.P.A.; Prasannakumari, A.A.; Sumitha, V.; Pramod, B.; Scaria, S.; Vidyalaya, K.; Cantt, A.; Tropical, J.N. Phytoremediation Potential of Lagenandra Ovata L. and Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Associated with Aruvikkara Reservoir, Kerala-South India. Ecol. Environ. Conserv. 2020, 26, 206–212. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ashraf, M.A.; Maah, M.J.; Yusoff, I. Heavy Metals Accumulation in Plants Growing in Ex Tin Mining Catchment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 8, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ashraf, M.A.; Maah, M.J.; Yusoff, I. Evaluation of Natural Phytoremediation Process Occurring at Ex-Tin Mining Catchment. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2013, 40, 198–213. [Google Scholar]
  34. Khan, M.A.; Shah, M.A.; Mir, S.S.; Bashir, S. The Environmental Status of a Kashmir Himalayan Wetland Game Reserve: Aquatic Plant Communities and Eco-Restoration Measures. Lakes Reserv. Res. Manag. 2004, 9, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, H.B. Cultivation of Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Ssp. Nucifera) and Its Utilization in China. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2009, 56, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Orozco Obando, W.S. Evaluation of Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) as an Alternative Crop for Phyto-Remediation. Ph.D. Thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA, 2012; p. 208. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Map showing the sampling site for the collection of composite industrial effluent (CIE) from the SIIDCUL industrial cluster of Haridwar, India (map not in scale).
Figure 1. Map showing the sampling site for the collection of composite industrial effluent (CIE) from the SIIDCUL industrial cluster of Haridwar, India (map not in scale).
Sustainability 14 09500 g001
Figure 2. Various experimental activities during the current study. (a) Collection of composite industrial effluent; (b) collection of sacred lotus (N. nucifera) plant from the submerged field; (c) view of phytoremediation step; (d) illustration of a tub used for phytoremediation.
Figure 2. Various experimental activities during the current study. (a) Collection of composite industrial effluent; (b) collection of sacred lotus (N. nucifera) plant from the submerged field; (c) view of phytoremediation step; (d) illustration of a tub used for phytoremediation.
Sustainability 14 09500 g002
Figure 3. Removal efficiency (%) of different physicochemical and heavy metal parameters of composite industrial effluent using sacred lotus (N. nucifera) plant (the same letters (a, b, c) indicate no significant difference between the initial and final parameter values at p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Removal efficiency (%) of different physicochemical and heavy metal parameters of composite industrial effluent using sacred lotus (N. nucifera) plant (the same letters (a, b, c) indicate no significant difference between the initial and final parameter values at p < 0.05).
Sustainability 14 09500 g003
Figure 4. (a) Pearson correlation and (b) principal component (PC) analysis biplot showing interactions between composite industrial effluent concentration (CIE) and various plant growth attributes of sacred lotus (N. nucifera) (FPB: fresh plant biomass; ChlP: chlorophyll content; PH: plant height; RL: root length; LS: leaf spread; NL: number of leaves; NF: number of flowers; *: level of significance i.e., p < 0.05).
Figure 4. (a) Pearson correlation and (b) principal component (PC) analysis biplot showing interactions between composite industrial effluent concentration (CIE) and various plant growth attributes of sacred lotus (N. nucifera) (FPB: fresh plant biomass; ChlP: chlorophyll content; PH: plant height; RL: root length; LS: leaf spread; NL: number of leaves; NF: number of flowers; *: level of significance i.e., p < 0.05).
Sustainability 14 09500 g004
Table 1. Average characteristics (mean ± SD; n = 3) of borewell water and composite industrial effluent (CIE) used for the phytoremediation experiments.
Table 1. Average characteristics (mean ± SD; n = 3) of borewell water and composite industrial effluent (CIE) used for the phytoremediation experiments.
ParametersBorewell WaterComposite Industrial Effluent
(CIE)
Student’s t-Test ^CPCB Standard for
Surface Discharge
t-Valuep-Value
pH7.71 ± 0.088.85 ± 0.0916.397<0.0015.5–9.0
EC (dS/m)0.58 ± 0.011.40 ± 0.0263.516<0.001na
TDS (mg/L)487.06 ± 24.491071.84 ± 85.2511.419<0.001na
BOD (mg/L)4.10 ± 0.19374.49 ± 20.2931.616<0.00130
COD (mg/L)11.14 ± 2.201118.11 ± 58.1032.976<0.001250
TKN (mg/L)13.11 ± 2.3176.55 ± 9.3511.409<0.001100
P (mg/L)6.85 ± 1.5543.67 ± 8.187.660<0.0015.0
Cd (mg/L)Bdl1.92 ± 0.0747.507<0.0012.0
Cu (mg/L)0.03 ± 0.012.16 ± 0.0752.174<0.0013.0
Cr (mg/L)Bdl2.14 ± 0.1230.888<0.001na
Fe (mg/L)1.09 ± 0.068.36 ± 0.2647.190<0.0013.0
Pb (mg/L)Bdl0.22 ± 0.0219.052<0.0010.1
Zn (mg/L)0.43 ± 0.059.84 ± 0.3151.905<0.0015.0
^: Statistically significant from each other if p < 0.05; Bdl: below detectable limits; na: not available; CPCB: Central Pollution Control Board of India.
Table 2. Reduction in the pollution load of composite industrial effluent (CIE) by sacred lotus (N. nucifera) before and after phytoremediation experiments.
Table 2. Reduction in the pollution load of composite industrial effluent (CIE) by sacred lotus (N. nucifera) before and after phytoremediation experiments.
ParametersTreatmentsConcentration
InitialFinal
pHControl7.78 ± 0.04 a6.21 ± 0.02 b
50%8.59 ± 0.03 a6.03 ± 0.02 b
100%8.94 ± 0.03 a6.88 ± 0.04 b
EC (dS/m)Control0.58 ± 0.01 a0.28 ± 0.07 b
50%1.08 ± 0.05 a0.40 ± 0.05 b
100%1.42 ± 0.07 a0.94 ± 0.04 b
TDS (mg/L)Control513.42 ± 6.77 a187.25 ± 5.37 b
50%902.71 ± 5.10 a94.28 ± 5.02 b
100%1162.49 ± 5.04 a547.27 ± 6.13 b
BOD (mg/L)Control4.27 ± 0.05 a1.60 ± 0.06 b
50%235.60 ± 4.06 a51.35 ± 5.08 b
100%392.50 ± 4.36 a147.78 ± 5.78 b
COD (mg/L)Control13.20 ± 0.96 a5.85 ± 1.02 b
50%708.89 ± 6.07 a145.95 ± 2.52 b
100%1171.20 ± 3.60 a445.57 ± 5.87 b
TKN (mg/L)Control15.72 ± 2.05 a 4.83 ± 1.73 b
50%61.24 ± 2.07 a8.28 ± 1.22 b
100%86.74 ± 2.97 a24.50 ± 2.10 b
P (mg/L)Control8.10 ± 0.98 a3.31 ± 0.23 b
50%34.74 ± 2.02 a 8.21 ± 0.07 b
100%52.50 ± 1.74 a18.48 ± 1.90 b
Cd (mg/L)ControlBdlBdl
50%1.18 ± 0.01 a0.35 ± 0.08 b
100%1.98 ± 0.04 a1.14 ± 0.01 b
Cu (mg/L)Control0.03 ± 0.01 a0.01 ± 0.02 b
50%1.34 ± 0.03 a0.19 ± 0.07 b
100%2.22 ± 0.04 a1.16 ± 0.06 b
Cr (mg/L)ControlBdlBdl
50%1.37 ± 0.02 a0.43 ± 0.05 b
100%2.26 ± 0.02 a1.062 ± 0.07 b
Fe (mg/L)Control1.14 ± 0.01 a0.50 ± 0.01 b
50%5.60 ± 0.02 a1.52 ± 0.02 b
100%8.57 ± 0.02 a3.25 ± 0.02 b
Pb (mg/L)ControlBdlBdl
50%0.13 ± 0.02 a0.03 ± 0.07 b
100%0.23 ± 0.08 a0.11 ± 0.02 b
Zn (mg/L)Control0.47 ± 0.04 a0.16 ± 0.02 b
50%6.08 ± 0.09 a1.55 ± 0.04 b
100%10.14 ± 0.03 a4.92 ± 0.02 b
Values are mean ± SD of six replicates; The same letters (a, b) indicate no significant difference between the initial and final parameter values at p < 0.05; Bdl: below detectable limits.
Table 3. Accumulation of selected heavy metals by the root and leaf parts of sacred lotus (N. nucifera) before and after phytoremediation of composite industrial effluent (CIE).
Table 3. Accumulation of selected heavy metals by the root and leaf parts of sacred lotus (N. nucifera) before and after phytoremediation of composite industrial effluent (CIE).
Heavy MetalsTreatmentsBefore Phytoremediation (mg/kg)After Phytoremediation
(mg/kg)
BCFTF
RootsLeavesRootsLeavesRootsLeaves
CdControl0.34 ± 0.09 a0.37 ± 0.04 a0.34 ± 0.09 a0.37 ± 0.04 ananana
50%0.73 ± 0.06 b0.75 ± 0.02 b2.102.141.02
100%0.72 ± 0.06 b0.70 ± 0.10 b0.640.620.97
CuControl4.37 ± 0.05 a4.43 ± 0.08 a4.38 ± 0.02 a4.38 ± 0.04 a273.80273.901.00
50%4.77 ± 0.03 b4.99 ± 0.02 b11.9912.551.05
100%4.95 ± 0.04 b5.14 ± 0.01 b4.254.421.04
CrControl3.04 ± 0.08 a3.90 ± 0.08 a3.70 ± 0.05 b3.90 ± 0.08 bnanana
50%4.42 ± 0.96 b4.69 ± 0.11 b10.2010.811.06
100%4.22 ± 1.06 b4.33 ± 0.14 b3.984.081.02
FeControl26.25 ± 3.83 a27.24 ± 4.00 a26.54 ± 6.90 a27.16 ± 3.90 a53.3154.551.02
50%28.00 ± 0.99 b29.96 ± 0.43 a18.4319.711.07
100%28.68 ± 1.62 a28.79 ± 1.75 a8.838.861.00
PbControl4.37 ± 0.06 a4.81 ± 0.03 a4.37 ± 0.06 a4.81 ± 0.03 ananana
50%4.41 ± 0.07 b4.89 ± 0.04 a125.30139.081.11
100%4.47 ± 0.01 b4.85 ± 0.02 a38.9542.191.08
ZnControl14.10 ± 0.05 a15.79 ± 2.83 a14.41 ± 0.04 b15.90 ± 0.31 a85.9794.821.10
50%15.51 ± 0.12 b17.81 ± 1.14 a10.0111.491.15
100%16.13 ± 0.47 b17.34 ± 1.06 a3.283.531.07
Values are mean ± SD of six replicates; The same letters (a, b) indicate no significant difference between the initial and final parameter values at p < 0.05; BCF: bioaccumulation factor; TF: translocation factor (root to leaves); na: not applicable.
Table 4. Changes in plant growth attributes of sacred lotus (N. nucifera) grown in selected concentrations of composite industrial effluent (CIE).
Table 4. Changes in plant growth attributes of sacred lotus (N. nucifera) grown in selected concentrations of composite industrial effluent (CIE).
ParametersTreatmentsChanges
InitialFinal
Fresh Plant Biomass
(g/plant; without flowers)
Control465.24 ± 7.25 a660.64 ± 4.71 b
50%475.77 ± 8.63 a760.70 ± 8.77 b
100%470.84 ± 9.80 a670.40 ± 17.89 b
Chlorophyll content (mg/g fwt.)Control2.90 ± 0.05 a3.77 ± 0.47 b
50%2.88 ± 0.07 a4.30 ± 0.22 b
100%2.92 ± 0.05 a3.95 ± 0.06 b
Plant Height (cm)Control82.60 ± 1.30 a113.54 ± 3.18 b
50%82.80 ± 0.98 a154.05 ± 4.55 b
100%83.50 ± 2.04 a140.22 ± 2.81 b
Root Length (cm)Control27.47 ± 0.25 a50.92 ± 1.50 b
50%26.82 ± 0.70 a70.35 ± 2.42 b
100%25.30 ± 0.46 a65.20 ± 1.74 b
Leaf Spread (cm)Control16.10 ± 0.12 a28.50 ± 0.35 b
50%15.20 ± 0.15 a41.58 ± 0.26 b
100%14.39 ± 0.20 a32.14 ± 0.41 b
Number of Leaves (per plant)Control3.00 ± 0.00 a6.00 ± 1.00 b
50%3.00 ± 0.00 a10.00 ± 1.00 b
100%3.00 ± 0.00 a7.00 ± 2.00 b
Number of FlowersControlna7.00 ± 1.00
50%na16.00 ± 2.00
100%na13.00 ± 1.00
Values are mean ± SD of six replicates; data presented as mean followed by the standard deviation of six replicates. The same letters (a, b) indicate no significant difference between the initial and final parameter values at p < 0.05; na: not applicable.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

AL-Huqail, A.A.; Kumar, P.; Eid, E.M.; Taher, M.A.; Kumar, P.; Adelodun, B.; Andabaka, Ž.; Mioč, B.; Držaić, V.; Bachheti, A.; et al. Phytoremediation of Composite Industrial Effluent using Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn): A Lab-Scale Experimental Investigation. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159500

AMA Style

AL-Huqail AA, Kumar P, Eid EM, Taher MA, Kumar P, Adelodun B, Andabaka Ž, Mioč B, Držaić V, Bachheti A, et al. Phytoremediation of Composite Industrial Effluent using Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn): A Lab-Scale Experimental Investigation. Sustainability. 2022; 14(15):9500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159500

Chicago/Turabian Style

AL-Huqail, Arwa A., Piyush Kumar, Ebrahem M. Eid, Mostafa A. Taher, Pankaj Kumar, Bashir Adelodun, Željko Andabaka, Boro Mioč, Valentino Držaić, Archana Bachheti, and et al. 2022. "Phytoremediation of Composite Industrial Effluent using Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn): A Lab-Scale Experimental Investigation" Sustainability 14, no. 15: 9500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159500

APA Style

AL-Huqail, A. A., Kumar, P., Eid, E. M., Taher, M. A., Kumar, P., Adelodun, B., Andabaka, Ž., Mioč, B., Držaić, V., Bachheti, A., Singh, J., Kumar, V., & Širić, I. (2022). Phytoremediation of Composite Industrial Effluent using Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn): A Lab-Scale Experimental Investigation. Sustainability, 14(15), 9500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159500

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop