The Way toward Sustainability: Policy Attention Evolution of Chinese Local Governments to Promote Entrepreneurship of Returnees Based on Grounded Theory and Social Network Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Design
3.1. Research Framework
- Q1: How does Chinese local governments’ policy attention evolve over time and help promote returnees’ entrepreneurship?
- Q2: How does Chinese local governments’ policy attention evolve in the space dimension and help promote returnees’ entrepreneurship?
- Q3: How does Chinese local governments’ policy attention evolve in specific policy domains and help promote returnees’ entrepreneurship?
- Q4: How does the cooperative relationship evolve among policy subjects and help promote returnees’ entrepreneurship?
3.2. Research Methods
3.2.1. Programmatic Grounded Method
3.2.2. Social Network Analysis Approach
3.3. Data Collection
4. Data Analysis
4.1. Analysis of Programmatic Grounded Theory
4.1.1. Open Coding
4.1.2. Spindle Coding
4.1.3. Selective Coding
4.1.4. Theoretical Saturation Test
4.2. Analysis of Social Network Approach
4.2.1. The Statistical Analysis of Keywords Frequency
4.2.2. The Social Network Analysis of Keywords
5. Conclusions
5.1. The Policy Attention Evolution on Time Dimension Has the Characteristic of Synchronism, Different Levels and “Reciprocal U”
5.2. The Policy Attention Evolution on Space Dimension Is Closely Linked to “Pull” and “Push” Force of Local Population Flow, and Has Neighborhood Effects
5.3. The Policy Attention Evolution on Specific Policy Domains Will Gradually Spread and Diversify with the Change of Local Governance Environment and Stage Goals
5.4. The Evolution Trend of Collaborative Social Network among Policy Objects Has the Characteristic of “Loose-Central-Loose”
6. Discussion
6.1. Theoretical Contributions
6.2. Research Limitation
6.3. Research Prospects
7. Suggestions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lobo, D.; Rodriguez, A.C.; Nova, S.P.d.C.; Ardichvili, A.A. Five Practices for Building Local Capacity in Sustainability-Driven Entrepreneurship for Place-Based Transformations. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Re, B.; Magnani, G. Value co-creation in circular entrepreneurship: An exploratory study on born circular SMEs. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 147, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiaobin, H.E.; Jiankun, L.I.U. The Effect of Government Support on the Firm Performance in Rural Area. J. Beijing Univ. Technol. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2021, 21, 48–63. [Google Scholar]
- Research Group on Development Strategy, Wuhan University, Research on “Entrepreneurship Trend” of Returning to the Countryside under the Background of Rural Revitalization: Based on a Survey in Hubei Province. Chin. J. Popul. Sci. 2022, 4, 115–128.
- Bird, K.; Simons, A.; Coomes, O.T. Linking human capabilities with livelihood strategies to speed poverty reduction: Evidence from Rwanda. World Dev. 2022, 151, 105728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Peng, X.; Peng, Y. Attention Evolution of Big Data Governance Policies of Local Governments-Based on Ground Theory and Social Netwok. J. Intell. 2020, 39, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, J.K.; Daneke, G.A.; Lenox, M.J. Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. J. Bus. Ventur. 2010, 25, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manjon, M.; Aouni, Z.; Crutzen, N. Green and digital entrepreneurship in smart cities. Ann. Reg. Sci. 2022, 68, 429–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Avillez, M.M.; Greenman, A.; Marlow, S. Ethical Judgments About Social Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Influence of Spatio-Cultural Meanings. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 161, 877–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scuotto, V.; Lemaire, S.L.L.; Magni, D.; Maalaoui, A. Extending knowledge-based view: Future trends of corporate social entrepreneurship to fight the gig economy challenges. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 139, 1111–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand, A.; Argade, P.; Barkemeyer, R.; Salignac, F. Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ventur. 2021, 36, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patzelt, H.; Shepherd, D.A. Recognizing opportunities for sustainable development. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2011, 35, 631–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanohov, R.; Baldacchino, L. Opportunity recognition in sustainable entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2017, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shepherd, D.A.; Patzelt, H.; Baron, R.A. “I CARE ABOUT NATURE, BUT...”: Disengaging values in accessing opportunities that cause harm. Acad. Manag. J. 2013, 56, 1251–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuorio, A.M.; Puumalainen, K.; Fellnhofer, K. Drivers of entrepreneurial intentions in sustainable entrepreneurship. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2018, 24, 359–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kuckertz, A.; Wagner, M. The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions- Investigating the role of business experience. J. Bus. Ventur. 2009, 25, 524–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cervelló-Royo, R.; Moya-Clemente, I. A configurational approach to a country’s entrepreneurship level: Innovation, financial and development factors. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 140, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- St-Jean, E.; Labelle, F. Wanting to change the world, is it too much of a good thing? How sustainable orientation shapes entrepreneurial behaviour. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2018, 24, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reynolds, O.; Sheehan, M.; Hilliard, R. Exploring strategic agency in sustainability-oriented entrepreneur legitimation. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2017, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ploum, L.; Blok, V.; Lans, T.; Omta, O. Toward a validated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship. Organ. Environ. 2018, 31, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wahga, A.I.; Blundel, R.; Schaefer, A. Understanding the drivers of sustainable entrepreneurial practices in Pakistan’s leather industry. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2018, 24, 382–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, T.B.; Blok, V.; Coninx, I. The diffusion of climate-smart agricultural innovations: System level factors that inhibit sustainable entrepreneurial action. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hockerts, K.; Wüstenhagen, R. Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids- Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 2019, 25, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soderstorm, S.B.; Heinze, K.L. From paradoxical thinking to practicing sustainable business: The role of a business collective organization in supporting entrepreneurs. Organ. Environ. 2021, 34, 74–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasbarro, F.; Annunziata, E.; Rizzi, F.; Frey, M. The interplay between sustainable entrepreneurs and public sustainable entrepreneurs and public authorities:Evidence from sustainable energy transitions. Organ. Environ. 2017, 30, 226–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinkse, J.; Groot, K. Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Political Activity: Overcoming Market Barriers in the Clean Energy Sector. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2015, 39, 633–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasbarro, F.; Rizzi, F.; Frey, M. Sustainable institutional entrepreneurship in practice. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2018, 24, 476–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaltegger, S.; Luedeke-Freund, F.; Hansen, E.G. Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organ. Environ. 2016, 29, 264–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, S.; Vladimirova, D.; Holgado, M.; Van Fossen, K.; Yang, M.; Silva, E.A.; Barlow, C.Y. Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergmann, T.; Utikal, H. How to Support Start-Ups in Developing a Sustainable Business Model: The Case of an European Social Impact Accelerator. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brillinger, A.-S.; Els, C.; Schäfer, B.; Bender, B. Business model risk and uncertainty factors: Toward building and maintaining profitable and sustainable business models. Bus. Horiz. 2020, 63, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barquet, A.P.; de Oliveira, M.G.; Amigo, C.R.; Cunha, V.P.; Rozenfeld, H. Employing the business model concept to support the adoption of product–service systems (PSS). Ind. Mark. Manag. 2013, 42, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parrish, B.D. Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. J. Bus. Ventur. 2019, 25, 510–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Provasnek, A.K.; Schmid, E.; Geissler, B.; Steiner, G. Sustainable Corporate Entrepreneurship: Performance and Strategies Toward Innovation. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 521–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Font, X.; Garay, L.; Jones, S. Sustainability motivations and practices in small tourism enterprises in European protected areas. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 1439–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, X.; Xu, J. Do Place-Based Policies Promote Local Innovation and Entrepreneurship? Rev. Financ. 2021, 26, 595–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.J. When do return migrants become entrepreneurs? The role of global social networks and institutional distance. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2020, 14, 125–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, Y.; Ye, Y. Specific Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Intention Among Newly Returned Chinese International Students. Front. Psychol. 2021, 115, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strauss, A.L.; Corbin, J.M. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 95–101. [Google Scholar]
- Morse, J.M.; Stern, P.N.; Corbin, J.; Bowers, B. Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 278–291. [Google Scholar]
- Suddaby, R. From the Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not. Acad. Manag. J. 2006, 49, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Glaser, B.G.; Strauss, A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.; Aldine: Chicago, IL, USA, 1999; pp. 7–11. [Google Scholar]
- Kenny, M.; Fourie, R. Contrasting classic, Straussian and Constructivist grounded theory: Methodological and philosophical conflicts. Qual. Rep. 2015, 20, 1270–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanley Wasserman. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application; Combridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 105–110. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, J.C. Social Networks. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 1974, 3, 279–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, J.C. The Concept and Use of Social Networks. In Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationship in Central Aferican Towns; Manchester University Press: Manchester, UK, 1975; pp. 170–175. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, E.S. A Theory of Migration. Demography 1966, 3, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravenstein, E.G. The Laws of Migrant. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1889, 52, 241–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wyllys, R.E. Measuring scientific prose with rank-frequency(‘Zipf’)curves: A new use for an old phenomenon. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1975, 2, 30–31. [Google Scholar]
- Massey, A. Sustainable Development Goals and their Fit with Good Governance. Glob. Policy 2022, 13, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambert, A.; Boons, F. Eco-industrial parks: Stimulating sustainable development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation 2002, 22, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bds, S.; Dalcol, P. Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration—Brazil. Technovation 2009, 29, 546–561. [Google Scholar]
- Mller, K.; Nenonen, S.; Storbacka, K. Networks, ecosystems, fields, market systems? Making sense of the business environment. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 90, 380–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlovskyi, S.; Grynyuk, R.; Baidala, V.; Burdiak, V.; Bakun, Y. Economic Security Management of Ukraine in Conditions of European Integration. Montenegrin J. Econ. 2019, 15, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kostiukevych, R.; Melnyk, L.; Krulický, T.; Kostiukevych, A.; Melnyk, L. A value-oriented approach to portfolio management of regional development projects and their financial support. J. Int. Stud. 2020, 13, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bite, P.; Konczos-Szombathelyi, M.; Vasa, L. The concept of labour migration from the perspective of Central and Eastern Europe. Econ. Sociol. 2020, 13, 197–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzi, M.; Kahanec, M.; Ulceluse, M.M. Europe’s Migration Experience and Its Effects on Economic Inequality; Discussion Paper Series; IZA Institute of Labor Economics: Bonn, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Srehan, H.S. The impact of social adjustment policy on Syrian refugees. J. Int. Stud. 2020, 13, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilan, Y.; Mishchuk, H.; Roshchyk, I.; Joshi, O. Hiring and retaining skilled employees in SMEs: Problems in human resource practices and links with organizational success. Bus. Theory Pract. 2020, 21, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elitcha, K. The moderating role of stock markets in bank competition- entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ. 2021, 56, 1333–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, P.E.; Bendickson, J.S.; Muldoon, J.; McDowell, W.C. Agency theory utility and social entrepreneurship: Issues of identity and role conflict. Rev. Manag. Sci. 1 2021, 15, 2229–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvador, M.; Sancho, D. The Role of Local Government in the Drive for Sustainable Development Public Policies. An Analytical Framework Based on Institutional Capacities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gava, O.; Ardakani, Z.; Delalić, A.; Azzi, N.; Bartolini, F. Agricultural cooperatives contributing to the alleviation of rural poverty. The case of Konjic (Bosnia and Herzegovina). J. Rural Stud. 2021, 82, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y. Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective. Res. Policy 2021, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dixon, R.; Elston, T. Efficiency and legitimacy in collaborative public management: Mapping inter-local agreements in England using social network analysis. Public Adm. 2020, 98, 746–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golan-Nadir, N. The Role of Interorganizational Competition in Motivating Street-Level Bureaucrats to Adopt Policy Entrepreneurship Strategies: The Case of Israeli Rabbis in Government Hospitals. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 2021, 51, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Original Statements | Concepts | Corresponding Concepts |
---|---|---|
The municipal government sets up special support funds of CNY 15,000,000 for people returning home to start businesses to provide financing support for home-returning entrepreneurs, as well as training and typical awards for entrepreneurship. | Strengthening governmental guidance and utilizing venture capital funds | Effective financial service |
The government can provide secured loans for startups of utmost CNY 150,000 for eligible home-returning entrepreneurs who engage in individual operations and loans of up to CNY 450,000 for starting businesses in partnership or organization. | Providing social security subsidies for people with difficulties in starting a business | More financial support |
Municipal and county administrative examination and approval service halls open comprehensive service windows for home-returning entrepreneurs, achieving the goal of handing at one time for returning home to start businesses. | Abolishing and delegating the power of administrative licenses | Lower standard |
Home-returning business operators with the potential for sustainable development and leading will be selected to conduct training activities. Municipal startup training camps provide subsidies for entrepreneurs for CNY 15,000 each year, which will be disbursed from municipal support funds for entrepreneurship and employment. | Cultivating outstanding individuals as home-returning entrepreneurs | Publicizing and guide returnees to start a business |
Strengthen internet training in all walks of life and set up e-commerce training courses for people returning home to start businesses. Additionally, it encourages home-returning people with master’s degrees or above to operate e-commerce businesses in Heze. | Encouraging people returning home to start businesses relying on the platform and business network | Enhancing online and offline infrastructures for internet startups |
Home-returning business operators with the potential for sustainable development and leading will be selected to conduct training activities. Municipal startup training camps provide subsidies for entrepreneurs for CNY 15,000 each year, which will be disbursed from municipal support funds for entrepreneurship and employment. | Cultivating outstanding individuals as home-returning entrepreneurs | Making great efforts to publicize and guide returnees to start a business |
Main Categories | Corresponding Categories | Concepts |
---|---|---|
Completing infrastructure | Developing business incubators for home-returning people relying on the integration of stock resources | Offering support in relation to returning entrepreneurs’ basic information and needs. |
Enhancing the development of online and offline infrastructure for internet startups | Encouraging telecommunication enterprises to increase investment in developing internet and mobile internet. | |
Enhancing the infrastructure construction of grassroots service platform | Promoting employment and social insurance service platforms in both counties and countryside. | |
Innovating service system | Reducing barriers to start business in the hometowns of returnees | Completing registration for people returning home to start businesses |
Strengthening enterprise training for people returning home | Implementation of special training projects. | |
Completing public service for people returning home to start businesses | Taking into consideration overall public service system reforms, such as social insurance, housing, education, and medicine. | |
Improving intermediary services for people returning home to start businesses | Supplying service-related information to market analysis, management and guidance. | |
Guiding the connection of “mass innovation” and returning home to start businesses | Providing science and technology service for them. | |
Improving policy guarantee system | Implementing policies to cut taxes and fees | Corporate income tax reduction. |
Providing more financial support | Offering people returning home to start businesses asocial insurance subsidy. | |
Effective financial service for people returning home to start businesses | Strengthening governmental guidance and utilizing venture capital fund. | |
Completing support system of business incubators for home-returning people | Completing infrastructure of business incubators, for instance, water and electricity, transportation, communication and broadband network. | |
Practicing organization and implementation | Strengthening the demonstration–promotion ability | Playing a demonstration role by developing a demonstration base of counties’ internet startups. |
Making great efforts to publicize and guide | Strengthening publicity and interpretation in a popular form for people returning home to start businesses. | |
Improving organization and coordination | Making sure the efficiency of work through specific schedules and detailed rules of implementation. |
Typical Relational Structure | Connotation of Relational Structure |
---|---|
Completing infrastructure → Consolidating the entrepreneurial foundation for returnees → Increasing the pull force in immigratory place | The construction of entrepreneurial infrastructure is the material foundation for migrant workers to start their businesses in their hometown. Measures such as developing business incubators for home-returning works relying on the integration of the stock resources, enhancing the development of online and offline infrastructure for internet startups as well as grassroots service platform provide higher-quality platforms for migrant workers starting business in their hometown, thus improving the “pull force” of the immigratory place directly. |
Innovating service system → Optimizing the entrepreneurial environment of returnees in their hometown → Increasing the pull force in immigratory place | The support and guarantee of public policies are conducive to solving the problem of lack of entrepreneurial resources of returnees and improving their entrepreneurial risk-resistance capacity. Measures such as reducing barriers to start business in their hometowns, implementing policies to cut taxes and fees and providing more financial support are conducive to improving policy for returnees, to improve the “pull force” of the immigratory place directly. |
Improving policy guarantee system → Solving the problem of lack of entrepreneurial resources of returnees → Improving their entrepreneurial risk-resistance capacity → Increasing the pull force in immigratory place | The support and guarantee of public policies are conducive to solving the problem of lack of entrepreneurial resources of returnees and improving their entrepreneurial risk-resistance capacity. Measures such as reducing barriers to start business in their hometowns, implementing policies to cut taxes and fees and providing more financial support are conducive to improving policy for returnees, to improve the “pull force” of the immigratory place directly. |
Practicing organization and implementation → Stimulating endogenous motivation for returnees → Improve their entrepreneurial quality → Increasing the pull force in immigratory place | Improving and expanding the quality and scope of public policy implementation for migrant workers starting business in their hometown is the fundamental influence factor of the success of their entrepreneurship, involves implementing policy and organizing accurately, necessary to stimulate endogenous motivation for returnees and improve their entrepreneurial quality. Measures such as improving organization and coordination, strengthening the demonstration–promotion ability and making great efforts to publicize and guide are conducive to further increasing the quality of public policies, thus improving the “pull force” of the immigratory place directly. |
Keywords | Frequency | Proportion |
---|---|---|
City people’s government | 201 | 31.7% |
Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security | 156 | 24.6% |
Provincial people’s government | 57 | 9.0% |
Country people’s government | 28 | 4.4% |
Administration committees of the development zone | 27 | 4.3% |
Administration committees of the high-tech zone | 23 | 3.6% |
Administration committees of industrial park | 23 | 3.6% |
Ministry of Finance | 20 | 3.1% |
Public institutions | 18 | 2.8% |
National Development and Reform Commission | 18 | 2.8% |
Banks and financial institutions | 10 | 1.6% |
Colleges, universities and vocational schools | 7 | 1.1% |
Enterprises | 6 | 0.95% |
Tax Bureau | 6 | 0.95% |
Demonstration areas of urban-rural integration | 5 | 0.79% |
Administration committees of the enterprise zone | 5 | 0.79% |
Administration committees of the resorts | 3 | 0.47% |
Administration committees of the medical high-tech zone | 3 | 0.47% |
People’s organizations | 3 | 0.47% |
Administration committees of the economic cooperation zone | 3 | 0.47% |
Economic and Information Technology Commission | 2 | 0.31% |
Department of Land and Resources | 2 | 0.31% |
Department of Housing and Urban-Rural | 2 | 0.31% |
Agriculture Department | 2 | 0.31% |
Department of Commerce | 1 | 0.16% |
Civil Affairs Bureau | 1 | 0.16% |
Administration committees of overseas Chinese economic zone | 1 | 0.16% |
Administration Committees of international inland port zone | 1 | 0.16% |
Department of Transportation | 1 | 0.16% |
Regions | Provinces | The Number of Policy Releases | The Proportion of Policy Releases (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Northeast Comprehensive Economic Region | Heilongjiang Province, Jilin Province, Liaoning Province | 22 | 10.95 |
Northern Coastal Comprehensive Economic Region | Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei Province, Shandong Province | 13 | 5.39 |
Southern Coastal Comprehensive Economic Region | Fujian Province, Guangdong Province, Hainan Province | 15 | 6.22 |
Eastern Coastal Comprehensive Economic Region | Shanghai, Jiangsu Province, Zhejiang Province | 7 | 2.91 |
Middle Reaches of Changjiang River Comprehensive Economic Region | Hunan Province, Jiangxi Province, Anhui Province, Hubei Province | 42 | 17.43 |
Northwest Comprehensive Economic Region | Gansu Province, Qinghai Province, the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Tibet Autonomous Region, the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region | 10 | 4.15 |
Southwest Comprehensive Economic Region | Yunnan Province, Guizhou Province, Sichuan Province, Chongqing, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region | 63 | 24.32 |
Middle Reaches of Yellow River Comprehensive Economic Region | Shaanxi Province, Shanxi Province, Henan Province, the Nei Monggol Autonomous Region | 69 | 28.63 |
Specific Policy Areas | The Number of Policy Releases | The Proportion of Policy Releases (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Completing infrastructure | Developing business incubators | 59 | 24.28% |
Enhancing the development of online and offline infrastructure | 12 | 4.96% | |
Enhancing the infrastructure construction of grassroots service platform | 21 | 8.68% | |
Innovating service system | Intensifying the enterprise training | 24 | 9.92% |
Completing public service | 16 | 6.61% | |
Improving intermediary services | 5 | 2.07% | |
Guiding the connection of “mass innovation” | 6 | 2.48% | |
Improving policy guarantee system | Lower standard for starting business in hometown | 8 | 3.31% |
Implementing policies to cut taxes and fees | 20 | 8.26% | |
More financial support | 20 | 8.26% | |
Effective financial service for starting business in hometown | 21 | 8.68% | |
Completing support system of business incubators | 17 | 7.02% | |
Practicing organization and implementation | Improving organization and coordination | 5 | 2.07% |
Strengthening the demonstration effect | 3 | 1.24% | |
Making great efforts to publicize and guide | 4 | 2.16% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Qi, X.; Han, S. The Way toward Sustainability: Policy Attention Evolution of Chinese Local Governments to Promote Entrepreneurship of Returnees Based on Grounded Theory and Social Network Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013283
Qi X, Han S. The Way toward Sustainability: Policy Attention Evolution of Chinese Local Governments to Promote Entrepreneurship of Returnees Based on Grounded Theory and Social Network Analysis. Sustainability. 2022; 14(20):13283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013283
Chicago/Turabian StyleQi, Xingyu, and Songyan Han. 2022. "The Way toward Sustainability: Policy Attention Evolution of Chinese Local Governments to Promote Entrepreneurship of Returnees Based on Grounded Theory and Social Network Analysis" Sustainability 14, no. 20: 13283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013283
APA StyleQi, X., & Han, S. (2022). The Way toward Sustainability: Policy Attention Evolution of Chinese Local Governments to Promote Entrepreneurship of Returnees Based on Grounded Theory and Social Network Analysis. Sustainability, 14(20), 13283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013283