Posthuman Learning Culture and Internet-Based Private Tutoring in South Korea: Implications for Online Instruction in Public Schooling
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Korean Students’ Online Learning in Shadow Education (SE)
3. Research Methods
- ▪
- Classroom atmosphere
- ▪
- Instructional methods used
- ▪
- Modes of learning of students
- ▪
- Skills used to deliver content knowledge
- ▪
- Skills used to capture and maintain students’ attention
- ▪
- Evaluation methods
- ▪
- Communication between teacher and student, and student and student
- ▪
- Types of supporting learning materials provided
4. Features and Powerful Curriculum and Instruction in Internet-Based Private Tutoring in South Korea
4.1. Individualized Learning
It is not bad to follow the order of school learning, but I have a desire to learn more things that I understand quickly. So, the parts that I understood quickly became easy to understand even if I studied beyond the grade level. So, I have time to study in the areas where I am lacking in comprehension, and the areas I do not understand well are planned so that I can study in the previous grade or continue.(Choi’s interview, 7th grader)
Every child has a different temperament. Even in a subject, like math, kids differ in the areas they are good at. The program evaluates and diagnoses Jongyup periodically as if there is a teacher next to him, and provides lectures and other things, so Jongyeop learns much more easily. Since he found his own pace and learning style, I think he is now interested in learning math and studying his own way.(Interview with Jongyeop’s mother)
4.2. Effective Communication Skills in the Post-Human Space
When I take online classes with my students, it often leads to one-way, information-presenting lectures. Then, the students often get bored. I know. If it were a school, I could induce participation in class by talking directly or through body language, but that is very difficult in the online teaching context. And, although we can talk about the whole story with the program we are using now, it is very difficult to give immediate feedback to each individual student.(Teacher Choi’s interview)
Minju, a 6th grader, is learning math in E hakwon. She is listening to a math lecture video, but there is an instructor next to Kyung-hoon virtually. If Minju is doing something else or is dozing while she is listening to the lecture, the instructor sends an emoticon to wake her up. When she solves math questions, the instructor encourages her by sending an emoticon that says “Good job.” Not only that, while Minju is watching the video, the instructor asks if she understands or not. “Why did this formula come out?” “Explain this concept to me in chat,” “If the number changes like this, how should you solve it?” Minju’s learning is evaluated through various questions such as the degree of understanding and how to apply various concepts. At the end of the class, Minju completes the exam questions. The instructor provides further explanations on challenging questions and those Minju got wrong. After the lecture, the instructor recommends a good lecture to help Minju’s learning.
The biggest problem when I take online classes is that there is no teacher and no one to talk to, so it is difficult to concentrate. And in school online classes, when the teacher shows a video or does something, the teacher cannot talk, so I do not think I can concentrate anymore. But here, the teacher sends each friend an emoticon or a warning sound, and questions while I am watching lectures so I think I can study with a little tension.(Minju’s interview, 6th grader)
An 11th grader, SiJun, is taking a math class. While taking the class, SiJun takes notes of conceptual content on her tablet. Based on the notes, the instructor asks questions about whether she understands. Additionally, the instructor corrects her notes explaining why it is wrong. After class, the instructor presents SiJun with math problems related to today’s class. As SiJun checks the solutions she wrote while solving the problem, the instructor gives immediate feedback on what she lacks in solving the problem.
I think it was easier to understand because you were talking based on what I had written. If you just listen to the story, you can move on, but I think you can understand it better because you can hear it and see your note-taking and the teacher’s comments. And I think it was easier to study because the notes were saved.(SiJun’s interview, 11th grader)
The teacher made a set of learning materials including workbooks only for me. She told me that I lack a clear understanding of basic concepts in math. Thus, she formed a set of contents and explained to me how to learn them. Every day, yes every day, she checked my learning progress and I was able to ask questions whenever I needed. Eventually, my level was moved up to an advanced one. My Math grade at school moved from the third to first level which was the key element to entering Yonsei University I want to enter.(Ji Hyun’s interview, 12th grader)
4.3. Attention Skills for Cyber Learning
4.4. Advanced Internet Technologies and Tools
If you use a notebook to take notes, eventually, after a year, the notebook will wear out and you will not be able to write. And there is the hassle of having to find it every time you need it. However, if I use Smart Note, all the notes I take while studying are cumulatively saved, and when I send my notes to the teacher, they give me feedback right away. That is why I prefer using a smart notebook.(MinJung’s interview, 10th grader)
In general, the only way to evaluate whether I have studied this well is the test. And the teacher always says that I need to be able to explain this to be perfectly learned, but there is no place where I can tell such a story right now because of Corona. But I think the AI Hubruta program allows me to ask questions and answer questions, so that I can check the parts I do not know or whether I have learned correctly.(DongYup’s interview, 9th grader)
I tend to study harder when there are other people’s perspectives. But when I study alone, I do not have that kind of gaze, so I keep doing other things. But in the metaverse study space, other friends are checking to see if my avatar is studying, so I think my friends are actually looking at me. So I study harder. Also, it gives me a sense of studying together and competitively.(Minju’s interview, 11th grader)
5. Conclusions
Limitations and Future Study
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bennett, S.; Lockyer, L. Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educ. Media Int. 2004, 41, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlachopoulos, D.; Makri, A. Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. Int. Rev. Educ. 2019, 65, 605–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.S. An analysis of interaction patterns in face-to-face and online synchronous/asynchronous learning environments. J. Educ. Technol. 2004, 20, 63–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.S. A study on the correlation of between online learning patterns and learning effects in the non-face-to-face learning environment. J. Korea Acad. Ind. Coop. Soc. 2020, 21, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, S.H.; Park, M.R. A study on the factors influencing students’ learning flow and learning outcomes of real-time online learning in a Korean university. Multimed. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2021, 24, 130–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.W. Design and implementation of academy education management system using internet. J. Korea Soc. Comput. Inf. 2000, 5, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.C. Shadow Education and the Curriculum and Culture of Schooling in South Korea, 1st ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-1137513236. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.C.; Jung, J.-H. Conceptualizing shadow curriculum: Definition, features and the changing landscapes of learning cultures. J. Curric. Stud. 2019, 51, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.C.; Jung, J.-H. Shadow Education as Worldwide Curriculum Studies, 1st ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 978-3030039813. [Google Scholar]
- Weller, T. History in the Digital Age, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2012; ISBN 978-0-415-66697-8. [Google Scholar]
- Hashim, H. Application of technology in the digital era education. Int. J. Res. Couns. Educ. 2018, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.-H.; Hu, R.-P.; Chen, M.-L. Global pandemic prevention continual learning—taking online learning as an example: The relevance of self-regulation, mind-unwandered, and online learning ineffectiveness. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhow, C.; Graham, C.R.; Koehler, M.J. Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities. Educ. Psychol. 2022, 57, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.H. A study on the current situation and challenges of the educational gap in the context of COVID-19: A case study of Gyeonggi province. Korean J. Sociol. Educ. 2020, 30, 113–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.J.; Sung, E.M.; Lee, S.H. Exploring the motivation of elementary school students registered in an online gifted program. J. Gift. Talent. Educ. 2020, 30, 365–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ventura, A.; Jang, S. Private tutoring through the internet: Globalization and offshoring. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2010, 11, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C. Private tutoring and the subjective rationalities of parents: The experiences in South Korea and Singapore. Asian Educ. Dev. Stud. 2020, 11, 464–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, Y.J. The Comparative Analysis of EBS’s Public Value and Identity. Media Educ. 2011, 1, 3–30. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, E.K. Perspectives and challenges of informatics education: Suggestions for the informatics curriculum revision. J. Korean Assoc. Comput. Educ. 2018, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.L.; Park, M.W. A study on factors affecting the use of EBS. Korean J. Educ. Methodol. Stud. 2014, 26, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, Y.S.; Jung, M.Y.; Choi, J.H. A Study on the Development of EBS College Scholastic Ability Test 2007; Korean Educational Development Institute: Jincheon, Korea, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Javadi, Y.; Kazemirad, F. Worldwide shadow education epidemic and its move toward shadow curriculum. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 2020, 11, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozar, O. Discursive practices of private online tutoring websites in Russia. Discou. Stud. Cult. Politics Educ. 2015, 36, 354–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korea, S. The Survey of Private Education Expenses for Elementary School to High School; National Statistics: Seoul, Korea, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Yung, K.W.H.; Yuan, R. ‘The most popular star-tutor of English’: Discursive construction of tutor identities in shadow education. Discourse Stud. Cult. Politics Educ. 2020, 41, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobakhidze, M.; Suter, L.E. The global diversity of shadow education. Eur. J. Educ. 2020, 55, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sade-Beck, L. Internet ethnography: Online and offline. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2004, 3, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, Y.B.; Kim, Y.C. A Study on the characteristics and research procedure of internet ethnography. Korean Soc. Study Anthropol. Educ. 2013, 16, 83–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markham, A.N. Ethnography in the digital era: From fields to flow, descriptions to interventions. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed.; Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., Eds.; Sage Publications: Thousands Oaks, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 650–668. ISBN 9781506382920. [Google Scholar]
- Bennett, A. Case Study Methods: Design, Use, and Comparative Advantages. In Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations, 1st ed.; Sprinz, D.F., Wolinsky-Nahmias, N., Eds.; The University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2004; pp. 19–55. ISBN 978-0472068616. [Google Scholar]
- Macbeth, D. Hugh Mehan’s learning lessons reconsidered: On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2003, 40, 239–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, J. Research on teaching as a linguistic process: A state of the art. Rev. Res. Educ. 1983, 10, 151–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lincoln, Y.S.; Guba, E.G. Naturalistic Inquiry; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1985; ISBN 9780803924314. [Google Scholar]
- O’Neill, G.; McMahon, T. Student-centred learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers. In Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, 1st ed.; O’Neill, S.G., Moore, B.M., Eds.; AISHE: Dublin, Ireland, 2005; pp. 27–36. ISBN 0-9550134-0-2. [Google Scholar]
- Aurini, J.; Davies, S.; Dierkes, J.B. Out of the Shadows: The Global Intensification of Supplementary Education; Emerald Bingley: Bingley, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, P. We follow the private tutors not the teachers: An ethnographic insight into educational practices among the students of an Indian city. Int. J. Res. Soc. Sci. 2014, 4, 819. [Google Scholar]
- Mawer, K. Casting new light on shadow education: Snapshots of juku variety. Contemp. Jpn. 2015, 27, 131–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baker, D.P. An inevitable phenomenon: Reflections on the origins and future of worldwide shadow education. Eur. J. Educ. 2020, 55, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aurini, J.; Davies, S. Supplementary education in a changing organizational field: The Canadian case. In Out of the Shadows: The Global Intensification of Supplementary Education, 1st ed.; Aurini, J., Davies, S., Dierker, J., Eds.; Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pepperell, R. The Post-Human Condition; Intellect books: Bristol, UK, 1995; ISBN 1-871516-45-5. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, T. Towards a theory of online learning. In Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 2nd ed.; Anderson, T., Ed.; AU Press: Athabasca, AB, Canada, 2004; Volume 2, pp. 109–119. ISBN 978-1-897425-08-4. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, S.M.; Yang, I.H.; Kim, S.U. A survey on the perception of elementary school field education in the context of COVID-19 based on the teaching. J. Learn.-Cent. Curric. Instr. 2021, 21, 371–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.M. The operating conditions and tasks of elementary online korean traditional music education in an untact age. Music. Korea 2021, 61, 341–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, E.J.; Kwon, S.M. A study on the status of non-face-to-face music online remote classes. Korean J. Arts Educ. 2020, 18, 165–184. [Google Scholar]
- Baek, J.H.; Yoon, S.J. Exploring elementary teachers’ online physical education experiences during COVID-19 outbreak. J. Holist. Converg. Educ. 2020, 24, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simonson, M.; Smaldino, S.; Albright, M.; Zvacek, S. Teaching and Learning at a Distance Education; Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-1623967987. [Google Scholar]
- Lodge, J.M.; Harrison, W.J. Focus: Attention science: The role of attention in learning in the digital age. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2019, 92, 21. [Google Scholar]
- Harris, T. How Technology Hijacks people’s Minds—From a Magician and Google’s Design Ethicist. 2016. Available online: https://medium.com/thrive-global/how-technology-hijacks-peoples-minds-from-a-magician-and-google-s-design-ethicist-56d62ef5edf3. (accessed on 25 October 2022).
- Halupa, C. Risks: The impact of online learning and technology on student physical, mental, emotional, and social health. In Proceedings of the International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, 7–9 March 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frolova, E.V.; Rogach, O.V.; Tyurikov, A.G.; Razov, P.V. Online student education in a pandemic: New challenges and risks. Eur. J. Contemp. Educ. 2021, 10, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, B. Virtual Risks of e-Participation in Online Learning Environments and Dialogue; ECSM 2014 University of Brighton: Brighton, UK, 2014; p. 26. [Google Scholar]
- Tapscott, D. Educating the net generation. Educ. Leadersh. 1999, 56, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
- Erstad, O. Educating the digital generation. Nord. J. Digit. Lit. 2010, 5, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, S. Digital natives. In Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2012; pp. 212–219. ISBN 9781466603158. [Google Scholar]
- Ribble, M. Raising a Digital Child: A Digital Citizenship Handbook for Parents; ISTE Eugene: Oregon, AZ, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-1564842503. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, S.J.; Jang, M.R. On secondary mathematics teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy. Math. Educ. 2016, 55, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mystakidis, S. Metaverse. Encyclopedia 2022, 2, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Types of Data | Examples | Data Source |
---|---|---|
Curricular materials | Textbooks, program descriptions, evaluation sheets, and teacher guides | Hakwon websites, school websites, schoolteachers and hakwon instructors |
Learning materials | Learning diaries, evaluation sheets, exam papers, portfolios, notebooks, smartphone data | Student participants and parents |
Teaching materials | Teaching plans, presentation materials, exam data sets | Schoolteachers and hakwon instructors |
Participants | Interview Questions |
---|---|
Students |
|
School teachers & Hakwon instructors |
|
Parents |
|
Themes | Codes | Data |
---|---|---|
Individualized learning | Personalized curriculum | “There is a much greater advantage to being able to adapt my own learning process rather than keeping up with school progress”. (student interview) |
Various selections of instructors and courses | “In the internet hakwon, I can choose from several instructors and lectures. You have a lot more options than at school, so you can study more efficiently”. (student interview) | |
Choices of learning time and places | Minsu, unlike other students, took out his tablet at 2 am at the coffee shop and started studying. He was going through the process of creating his own routine, choosing a time and place for his approach. (fieldnote) | |
Effective communication skills | Instructors communicative gestures | “But here, the teacher sends each friend an emoticon or a warning sound, and questions while I am watching lectures so I think I can study with a little tension”. (student interview) |
Communication through note-taking | “While taking the class, SiJun takes notes of conceptual content on her tablet. Based on the notes, the instructor asks questions about whether she understands”. (student interview) | |
Sleepless tutors | “Every day, yes every day, she checked my learning progress and I was able to ask questions whenever I needed”. (student interview) | |
Attention skills | Multisensory teaching and lecture | When explaining historic relics in his class, Mr. S. shows the structure of the relics in CG or provides additional video materials so that students can easily understand them. (fieldnote) |
Unique and attractive ways of speaking | Instructor J did not allow any time to get bored during the lectures with his unique way of speaking and funny jokes. (fieldnote) | |
Dynamic screen composition | He also employs filming techniques that can instantly reawaken students’ concentration, such as rotating or exploding the screen. (fieldnote) | |
Advanced Internet technologies and tools | Smart notebook | “If I use Smart Note, all the notes I take while studying are cumulatively saved, and when I send my notes to the teacher, they give me feedback right away. That is why I prefer using a smart notebook”. (student interview) |
AI learning program | “But I think the AI Hubruta program allows me to ask questions and answer questions, so that I can check the parts I do not know or whether I have learned correctly”. (student interview) | |
Increased sense of presence through metaverse | “But in the metaverse study space, other friends are checking to see if my avatar is studying, so I think my friends are actually looking at me. So, I study harder. Also, it gives me a sense of studying together and competitively”. (student interview) |
School | Features of Online Learning | Internet Hakwon |
---|---|---|
| Individualized learning |
|
| Effective communication |
|
| Attention skills |
|
| Advanced technologies |
|
Tutor | Subject | Number of Enrolled Students | Styles |
---|---|---|---|
Mr. S | Korean History | 1,200,000 | Theater-based talks and lectures |
Mr. R | Korean language | 200,000 | Action-based behaviors and gestures |
Ms. L | Social studies | 1,000,000 | Use of life history of successful college students at Korean IVY League Students |
Mr. B | Science | 200,000 | Use of advanced computer graphic materials |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jung, J.-H.; Bang, G.H.; Kim, Y.C. Posthuman Learning Culture and Internet-Based Private Tutoring in South Korea: Implications for Online Instruction in Public Schooling. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114566
Jung J-H, Bang GH, Kim YC. Posthuman Learning Culture and Internet-Based Private Tutoring in South Korea: Implications for Online Instruction in Public Schooling. Sustainability. 2022; 14(21):14566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114566
Chicago/Turabian StyleJung, Jung-Hoon, Gi Hong Bang, and Young Chun Kim. 2022. "Posthuman Learning Culture and Internet-Based Private Tutoring in South Korea: Implications for Online Instruction in Public Schooling" Sustainability 14, no. 21: 14566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114566
APA StyleJung, J. -H., Bang, G. H., & Kim, Y. C. (2022). Posthuman Learning Culture and Internet-Based Private Tutoring in South Korea: Implications for Online Instruction in Public Schooling. Sustainability, 14(21), 14566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114566