Next Article in Journal
Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development
Previous Article in Journal
The Formation Mechanism of Social Identity Based on Knowledge Contribution in Online Knowledge Communities: Empirical Evidence from China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Comparative Study of the Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Travel Intentions of Chinese and Korean Consumers in Tourism Destinations

Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 2062; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042062
by Weijia Li and Ziyang Liu *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 2062; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042062
Submission received: 23 December 2021 / Revised: 22 January 2022 / Accepted: 2 February 2022 / Published: 11 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Tourism, Culture, and Heritage)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It would be nice if the references in the text were added to the main reference list

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments! Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. Please cite recent literature from reputable journal in related field of study.
  2. What sampling techniques are you using? and how you calculate sampling size?
  3. Please mention which scholar are you referring on reliability of your questionnaires.
  4. I feel some contradict on your topic study on negative impact but in your page 2, you mentioned study on positive effect impact on negative words of mouth. Maybe some amendment on this part needed?.
  5. Probably some brief explaination on why korean and chinese consumer as your respondent? A reader might interested to know also

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments! Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

A brief (general) description of the destinations will help to better understand  the research outcomes.

 

Likewise, more demographic characteristics of the involved respondents would  improve understanding of the findings. 

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments! Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop