Inter-Municipal Methodology for Climate Transition Strategies: The First Case in Italy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Lack of a coherent and updated knowledge framework [11]: up-to-date and specific knowledge is essential to plan appropriate and effective compensatory actions;
- Lack of a territorial and inter-municipal vision: adaptation and mitigation policies are usually only developed municipally, when CC impacts would otherwise often involve a wider territorial context, so responses to these gaps should be planned in an equally wide context [12];
- Lack of technical knowledge due to economic restrictions;
- Lack of holistic, multilevel, and interdisciplinary solutions: adaptation and mitigation actions are relegated to specific plans and are not able to interface with mandatory planning [13].
2. The Call for Ideas “Strategia Clima” and the Application Case: West Brianza (Italy)
3. Methodology
- Build a knowledge base on adaptation;
- Assess the impacts of climate change at macro and micro levels;
- Assess vulnerability and relative adaptive capacity;
- Identify possible adaptation options (design of adaptation measures);
- Implementation of measures;
- Monitoring and evaluation of effectiveness.
- Definition of the coordination structure and tools: building a direction able to give continuity to the initiatives, to open up to the territory, and to create the best conditions for its further development and implementation.
- Construction of a knowledge framework: starting an integrated analysis that takes into account demographic, economic, climatic, and energy aspects in order to assess the impacts and consequences that the new climate scenarios will determine on the territory.
- Construction of a common vision and strategic goals: defining an overall strategic vision, based on the synthesis of existing local and wide area plans, aiming to provide a reference framework and a long-term projection for the territories considered, as well as defining priority lines of action for future integrated development adapted to local climate conditions.
- Improvement of planned actions in a resilient perspective: transforming theoretical indications into a synergic framework of functional actions for the achievement of the set of strategic macro-objectives, which are the result of a shared planning among the different local authorities and administrations and derive from an in-depth analysis of the cognitive framework, the level of priority, and the degree of political and economic feasibility of the interventions themselves.
- Mainstreaming local planning: integrating the concept of mainstreaming [18] (inclusion of climate aspects in development programs, policies, or management strategies) into the development and governance dynamics of partner municipalities, to transfer the objectives of superordinate planning to local planning, to promote the intersectoriality of local instruments and policies, and to harmonize administrative procedures on adaptation and mitigation.
4. Results
- Definition of the coordination structure and tools;
- Construction of a knowledge framework;
- Construction of a common vision and strategic goals;
- Improvement of planned actions in a resilient perspective;
- Mainstreaming local planning.
4.1. Definition of the Coordination Structure and Tools
- The Climate Transition Steering Committee (CTSC) is based on a coordinator and contact persons for each partner authority;
- The action of maintaining the network, which guarantees operability and constant dialogue between all partners, also through the support function of the InnovA21 Agency;
- The preliminary stakeholder mapping that supports the definition of networking activities toward other municipalities and other institutional levels, which are configured as resources to be developed in synergy with the Communication actions for the project refinement process, and the collection of new ideas and allies for the implementation of the CTS;
- The Monitoring Plan, which is proposed as a tool to follow the development of individual actions over time and to strengthen their capacity to contribute to the overall vision and to collect and stimulate other virtuous developments on the territory, consistent with the CTS;
- The action of searching for funding aims to guarantee the partnership (and its desirable extension to other subjects), the resources needed to nurture new project ideas, and to concretely implement new actions and solutions.
4.2. Construction of a Knowledge Framework
- A framework and account of territorial dynamics: it includes the networks that structures the macro-area context, the provincial economic framework, a demographic analysis per municipality, and a wide area economic analysis;
- A climate profile from the regional to the local scale and a subsequent definition of local-scale impacts deriving from climate change;
4.3. Construction of a Common Vision and Strategic Goals
4.4. Improvement of Planned Actions in a Resilient Perspective
- Revision of urban planning instruments (Action 1): to promote an increasingly systematic introduction of the logic and principles of climate mitigation and adaptation into existing planning tools;
- Climate Change adaptation and mitigation (Actions 2 to 13): to put into practice in various contexts the principles of sustainable urban drainage, river rehabilitation, naturalization of forest contexts, and integration of green areas in urban spaces, along with active mobility networks. All these actions are, therefore, experiences to be consolidated and further improved, to be used as pilot actions and to be multiplied;
- Search for funding (Action 14): to activate future developments on various types of action that can be activated by PA;
- Development of networks and tools for updating climate-relevant knowledge (Action 15): to create greater awareness, collaboration, predictive, and operational capacity of all stakeholders relevant to the CTS;
- Capacity building and technical training (Action 16): to consolidate opportunities for stimulation, exchange, and professionalization in the PA;
- Citizenship involvement and communication (Action 17 and 18): to spread and multiply the basic principles of the CTS.
4.5. Mainstreaming in Local Planning Tools
5. Discussion
- A high level of knowledge of the territorial context of reference concerning the goals of the F2C project;
- A wide description of activities consistent with the territorial context, innovative, and replicable;
- It was able to work in an inter-municipal and coordinated perspective, providing a global solution approach guaranteeing adequate involvement of each partner and a suitable governance structure of the project, able to remain on time;
- It provided a solid and credible vision of the territory in the medium-long-term concerning climate change;
- Fondazione Cariplo guaranteed adequate economic resources for the implementation of the actions contained in the CTS able to activate a cascade of new lines of funding.
- Provide a broader context for action: bringing several municipalities together for a unified purpose or with an agreed direction in both the analysis and the resolution of critical issues and gaps can help local authorities make up for the lack of staff and resources they often face;
- Increase the effectiveness of actions: the impacts of climate change may involve several municipalities and areas not necessarily separated by administrative borders. Thinking and implementing integrated and homogeneous actions among municipalities can increase their effectiveness and efficiency, contributing to the virtuous management of economic and personnel resources, as well as materials;
- Optimizing resources: providing integrated responses to several municipalities facing similar gaps related to the management of climate change impacts can optimize the use of resources, but also the retrieval of regional, state, and European funds and contributions, which increasingly reward territorial aggregation and partnerships in the development of local strategies.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Step I—Call for Ideas: the selection of partnerships formed by a municipal administration in the role of leader, at least one managing body of a naturalistic area of high importance for the protection of biodiversity and one private nonprofit body with experience in initiatives of citizen involvement in the field of environmental sustainability and sustainable lifestyles;
- Step II—Technical Assistance for co-design: the selected areas have been admitted to the Technical Assistance service for the co-design of a Climate Transition Strategy at the local scale. This phase foresees the accompaniment by an interdisciplinary team of experts selected by the Foundation. This phase is also supported by a Technical Scientific Committee of Climate Strategy, which ensures the coherence of the specific projects with the general strategy of Fondazione Cariplo. It also contributes to identifying solutions to any criticalities that emerge during the implementation of the actions;
- Step III—Implementation: in this step, some of the activities foreseen by the Climate Transition Strategy have been implemented by the partnership.
Appendix A.1. Target Groups
- A municipal administration in the role of leader, which will act to find solutions to citizens’ needs arising from CC impacts (environmental, social, and economic) and will coordinate the actions of the partnership;
- A managing body of a naturalistic area, for the protection of biodiversity and ecosystem services essential to urban areas;
- A private nonprofit organization, with experience in citizen involvement initiatives in the field of environmental sustainability and sustainable lifestyles.
Appendix A.2. Admissible Ideas
- Description of the local main criticalities regarding CC impacts (from the point of view of each of the partners);
- Description of the proposal that should indicate the broad activities foreseen in the future climate strategy;
- Description of partners’ roles and project governance;
- Summary list of initiatives already undertaken or about to be undertaken aimed at CC adaptation and mitigation in the project area;
- Strategic vision of the territory in the medium and long term (5 years and 10 years, respectively) in relation to CC impacts;
- Business plan of the project idea;
- Available economic resources.
Appendix A.3. Evaluation Criteria
- A high level of knowledge of the reference territorial context in relation to the objectives of the F2C project;
- A description of activities that are coherent with the territorial context, innovative, and replicable;
- Adequate involvement of each partner and a suitable project governance structure;
- A solid and credible medium-long-term vision of the territory in relation to the CC;
- Substantial previous experience in the field of CC at the local scale;
- Own economic resources for the implementation of the actions contained in the Strategy;
- Broad support from other local actors and stakeholders, such as universities, research bodies, trade associations, and citizens’ committees.
Appendix B
Methodological Step | Date | Topic of Discussion | Presence | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Definition of the Coordination Structure and Tools | 2. Construction of a Knowledge Framework | 3. Construction of a Common Vision and Strategic Goals | 4. Improvement of Planned Actions in a Resilient Perspective | 5. Mainstreaming Local Planning | Fondazione Cariplo | Technical and Scientific Committee (TSC) | Technical Assistance (Iuav—Ambiente Italia) | Bovisio Masciago | Cesano Maderno | Meda | Varedo | Groane Park | InnovA21 Agency | Fondazione Lombardia per lAmbiente (FLA) | Other Partners | ||
11 January 2021 | Presentation of consultants Project idea presentation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
X | X | X | X | X | 18 January 2021 | Presentation of proposed methodology | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
X | 21 January 2021 | Presentation of coordination proposal | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
X | 25 January 2021 | Revision of coordination proposal | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
X | 1 February 2021 | Proposal analysis plans | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
X | 4 February 2021 | Vision Definition | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
X | 12 February 2021 | Vision Review | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
X | 1 March 2021 | Business plan | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
X | 18 March 2021 | Monitoring systems and networks | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
X | 22 March 2021 | Capacity Building Pathways | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
X | 25 March 2021 | Meeting with the Municipality of Cesano Maderno and the Municipality of Varedo | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
X | 30 March 2021 | Meeting with the Municipality of Meda | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
X | 30 March 2021 | Meeting with Groane Park | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
X | 1 April 2021 | Meeting with the Municipality of Bovisio Masciago | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
X | X | X | X | X | 7 April 2021 | Presentation of the progress of the Climate Transition Strategy by the territory to the CTS | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
X | X | X | X | X | 12 April 2021 | Presentation of the draft Climate Transition Strategy and in-depth analysis of Action 1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
X | X | X | X | X | 15 April 2021 | First draft of STC presentation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
X | X | X | X | X | 5 May 2021 | CTS opinion return meeting | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
X | X | X | X | X | 17 May 2021 | Final STC presentation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
References
- Allen, M.R.; Babiker, M.; Chen, Y.; de Coninck, H.; Connors, S.; van Diemen, R.; Dube, O.P.; Ebi, K.L.; Engelbrecht, F.; Ferrat, M.; et al. Summary for Policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5 °C; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare (MATTM). Strategia Nazionale di Adattamento ai Cambiamenti Climatici—SNACC; MATTM: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence, V. The Resilient City. Urban Rural. Sociol. 2007, 82, 57–65. [Google Scholar]
- Patel, R.; Nosal, L. Defining the Resilient City; United Nations University Centre for Policy Research (UNU-CPR): New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Musco, F.; Maragno, D.; Magni, F.; Innocenti, A.; Negretto, V. Padova Resiliente; CORILA: Venice, Italy, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Mercalli, L. L’urgenza del Problema Ecologico: Uno Sguardo Dalla Scienza; Qiqajon: Biella, Italy, 2016; pp. 99–120. [Google Scholar]
- MacKinnon, D. Resilient City; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brugmann, J. Financing the resilient city. Environ. Urban. 2012, 24, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leichenko, R. Climate change and urban resilience. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2011, 3, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magni, F.; Musco, F.; Litt, G.; Carraretto, G. The Mainstreaming of NBS in the SECAP of San Donà di Piave: The LIFE Master Adapt Methodology. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Measham, T.G.; Preston, B.L.; Smith, T.F.; Brooke, C.; Gorddard, R.; Withycombe, G.; Morrison, C. Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2011, 16, 889–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reckien, D.; Salvia, M.; Heidrich, O.; Church, J.M.; Pietrapertosa, F.; De Gregorio-Hurtado, S.; D’Alonzo, V.; Foley, A.; Simoes, S.G.; Lorencová, E.K.; et al. How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 191, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arras, F.; Baruzzi, V.F.; Carraretto, G.; Santos, T.F.; Giordano, F.; Lapi, M.; Litt, G.; Luise, D.; Magni, F.; Marras, S.; et al. DELIVERABLE AZIONE C3—Linee Guida per il Mainstreaming nei Gruppi di Comuni”—LIFE15 CCA/IT/000061 MASTER ADAPT—“MainSTreaming Experiences at Regional and Local Level for Adaptation to Climate Change; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- F2C—Fondazione Cariplo per il Clima. Available online: https://www.fondazionecariplo.it/it/progetti/ambiente/f2c-fondazione-cariplo-per-il-clima.html (accessed on 26 May 2021).
- Jabareen, J. Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities 2013, 31, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNFCCC—United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Compendium on Methods and Tools to Evaluate Impacts of, and Vulnerability and Adaptation to, Climate Change; UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Magni, F. Climate Proof Planning: L’adattamento in Italia tra Sperimentazioni e Innovazioni; Franco Angeli: Milan, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bockel, L.; Smit, B. How to Mainstream Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation into Agriculture Policies? FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Vitale, C.; Meijerink, S. Understanding inter-municipal conflict and cooperation on flood risk policies for the metropolitan city of Milan. Water Altern. 2021, 14, 597–618. [Google Scholar]
- LIFE MASTER ADAPT Project. Available online: https://masteradapt.eu (accessed on 3 October 2020).
- LIFE METRO ADAPT Project. Available online: https://www.lifemetroadapt.eu/en/ (accessed on 13 December 2021).
- LIFE VENETO ADAPT Project. Available online: https://www.venetoadapt.it/en/ (accessed on 3 November 2021).
- Contratto di Fiume Seveso. Available online: https://www.contrattidifiume.it/it/azioni/seveso/ (accessed on 27 February 2021).
- Carta per L’azione dei Comuni del Bacino Idrico del Fiume Seveso verso L’adattamento Locale ai Cambiamenti Climatici. Available online: https://masteradapt.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Carta-del-Seveso_firmata.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2020).
- Musco, F.; Maragno, D.; Litt, G.; Businaro, G. Common goods and climate proof cities: The LUCI approach. Boll. Del Cent. Calza Bini 2020, 20, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arras, F.; Baruzzi, V.F.; Carraretto, G.; Santos, T.F.; Giordano, F.; Lapi, M.; Litt, G.; Luise, D.; Magni, F.; Marras, S.; et al. Linee Guida per L’implementazione del Mainstreaming Nelle Città Metropolitane”—LIFE15 CCA/IT/000061 MASTER ADAPT—“MAinSTreaming Experiences at Regional and Local Level for Adaptation to Climate Change; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Action | Title | Indicators | Quantification of Results Expected (Minimum Requirement) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Review of urban planning instruments | Mainstreamed planning instruments | 4 |
Adaptation and mitigation measures | - | ||
Definition of area targets for monitoring | - | ||
2 | Replacement of the paving of the cemetery area | Increase in the de-waterproofed area | 7500 m2 |
Subtraction of volume to surface runoff | 5200 m3/year | ||
Improvement of runoff coefficient | From 0.9 to 0.6 | ||
3 | Redevelopment of the market area | Increase in the de-waterproofed area | 1000 m2 |
Subtraction of volume to surface runoff | 700 m3/year | ||
Improvement of the runoff coefficient | From 0.9 to 0.6 | ||
Increase in planting | 30 | ||
CO2 absorbed | 210 kg/year | ||
4 | De-waterproofing and implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SuDS) | Increase in the de-waterproofed area | 1500 m2 |
Subtraction of volume to surface runoff | 1000 m3/year | ||
Improvement of the runoff coefficient | From 0.9 to 0.6 | ||
Increase in planting | 14 | ||
CO2 absorbed | 100 kg/year | ||
5 | Improvement of the sewerage system through SUDs | Increase in the de-waterproofed area | 700 m2 |
Subtraction of volume to surface runoff | 490 m3/year | ||
Improvement of the runoff coefficient | From 0.9 to 0.6 | ||
6 | Redevelopment of a section of the Cisnara stream | Improvement of the flood lamination capacity | 2000 m3 |
Increase in re-naturalized wetlands | 1500 m2 | ||
Increase in rehabilitated area with new forest | 2800 m2 | ||
Increase in planting | 375 trees, 188 shrubs | ||
CO2 absorbed | 2800 kg/year | ||
7 | Hydraulic forestry intervention on the Serenza stream | Improvement of the safety of the banks of the stream and the bridge-gallery | Qualitative estimates |
Naturalistic upgrading of the banks | 12 m | ||
8 | Hydraulic forestry intervention on the Valletta stream | Naturalistic upgrading of the banks | 300 m |
CO2 absorbed | 3750 kg/year | ||
9 | Conservation and enhancement of moorland habitats | Improvement of heathland habitats | 3.5 ha |
Improvement of the forest | 8 ha | ||
10 | Forest improvement and containment of exotic species | Improvement of forest structure | 4.6 ha 530 removals of non-native plants |
11 | Renaturalization of the Biulè tank | Increase in re-naturalized wetlands | 3600 m2 |
12 | Cycle-pedestrian track with SuDS | Implementation of a new cycle-pedestrian track | 1.5 km |
Subtraction of volume to surface runoff and/or sewerage system | 2600 m3/year | ||
Improvement of runoff coefficient | From 0.9 to 0.6 | ||
Increase in cycling users | Qualitative estimates | ||
Traffic reduction and air quality improvement | Qualitative estimates | ||
13 | Cycle-pedestrian track with SuDS | Implementation of a new cycle-pedestrian track | 180 m |
Subtraction of volume to surface runoff | 2600 m3/year | ||
Improvement of runoff coefficient | From 0.9 to 0.6 | ||
Increase in cycling users | Qualitative estimates | ||
Traffic reduction and air quality improvement | Qualitative estimates | ||
14 | Support on request for funding | Report on the availability of calls for funding at the national and European level | 1 |
Implementation of a monthly newsletter on European design issues | 1 | ||
Implementation of a project proposal on funding calls at European level | 1 | ||
Implementation of a project proposal on regional/national funding calls | 1 | ||
15 | Monitoring systems and networks | Development of the open data communication system | - |
Updating of the climate profiling | 3 cameras 2 meteo-climatic stations | ||
Use of the information and its processing to support forecasting, intervention, prevention, planning, awareness-raising, and communication strategies | - | ||
16 | Capacity building | Increase in the quantity and quality of PA technician involvement | 60 technicians |
17 | Communication: climate counter | Achievement of users for the activities of the counter | 10,000 |
18 | Communication: awareness-raising and activation of citizenship and enterprises | Information communication to inhabitants | 90,000 |
Achievement of people actively involved in awareness-raising and participation initiatives | 1500 | ||
Achievement of Municipal Civil Protection groups involved | 7 | ||
Activation of project-specific social channels | 2 projects | ||
Implementation of project-specific website | 1 project | ||
Promotion of initiatives through social channels and existing partner websites | 15 social channels and websites | ||
19 | Communication: institutional networking | Activation of collaborations with actors outside the partnership | 10 |
Implementation of networking events attended by partners | 5 | ||
20 | Communication: partners networking | Increase in the capacity for inter-municipal interaction and between public and nonprofit partner organizations | - |
Increase in the efficiency of decision-making processes within the partnership | - |
Municipalities and/or Park Authority | Planning Tool | Guidelines to Be Included in the Plans |
---|---|---|
Bovisio Masciago | Local Government Plan | Promote planning that minimizes and compensates the waterproof surface In the survey framework, reference should also be made to a study of territorial vulnerability arising from climate change |
Green Regulation | Integrate the Green Regulation with the definition of the most suitable species for climate change Consider climate change in urban green area design criteria | |
Cesano Maderno | Green Regulation | Consider climate change in urban green area design criteria and consider measures to renationalize urban green areas Promote sustainable urban drainage measures and ensure the protection of remaining natural areas within the urban area Integrate the definition of the species best suited to climate change |
Meda | Building Regulation | Provide for greater adaptability and mitigation in new interventions and restructuring Define a Building Reduction Index to increase the response to heatwaves and urban floods |
Rules Plan | Encourage action to adapt to climate change in the urban environment. Contribute to the reduction in hydraulic risk and de-waterproofing | |
Varedo | Building Regulation | Integrate the definition of the species best suited to climate change |
Rules Plan | Promote urban regeneration by encouraging adaptation to climate change in the urban environment Contribute to the reduction in hydraulic risk and de-waterproofing | |
Green Regulation | Increase the capacity for territorial cohesion by laying down specific rules to provide for greater capacity for adaptation and mitigation in new interventions and restructuring Define a Building Reduction Index to increase the response to heatwaves and urban floods | |
Groane Park | Forest Steering Plan | Provide for the preparation of the Plan for the Park’s municipalities in the province of Milan Activate a technical discussion table with the province in order to obtain the data of the draft plan under preparation |
Forest Management Plan | Provide for the revision of expired plans, with updated mass and species data and management proposals | |
Agricultural sector plan | Revision and updating of the Plan with extension to the extension part of the Park Update of the census of agricultural activities |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Litt, G.; Ferraioli, E.; Magni, F.; Lucertini, G.; Musco, F. Inter-Municipal Methodology for Climate Transition Strategies: The First Case in Italy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052529
Litt G, Ferraioli E, Magni F, Lucertini G, Musco F. Inter-Municipal Methodology for Climate Transition Strategies: The First Case in Italy. Sustainability. 2022; 14(5):2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052529
Chicago/Turabian StyleLitt, Giovanni, Elena Ferraioli, Filippo Magni, Giulia Lucertini, and Francesco Musco. 2022. "Inter-Municipal Methodology for Climate Transition Strategies: The First Case in Italy" Sustainability 14, no. 5: 2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052529
APA StyleLitt, G., Ferraioli, E., Magni, F., Lucertini, G., & Musco, F. (2022). Inter-Municipal Methodology for Climate Transition Strategies: The First Case in Italy. Sustainability, 14(5), 2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052529