Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Overall Considerations
1.1.1. Climate Change Aspects
1.1.2. Social and Health Aspects
1.1.3. Economic Aspects
1.1.4. Energy Use Aspects
- Fuel producers: They can shift towards low-carbon fuels, such as biofuels, and other renewable energies.
- Car manufacturers: There are opportunities for the manufacturers to improve the fuel efficiency of their vehicles, in line with European standards.
- Vehicle drivers: There are options for vehicle drivers to opt for green mobility based on their travel frequency and distance, as well as on eco-driving practices.
1.2. Contribution and Objectives of the Paper
- 4.
- Discuss various challenges faced by the development of a sustainable transportation system.
- 5.
- Examine how sustainable transportation practices can contribute to limiting GHG emissions and improve sustainability as a whole.
- 6.
- Review and discuss the most efficient and novel research pathways to improve the sustainability of the transportation sector.
2. Methodology
- Phase 1: Identification of research questions
- Phase 2: Search strategy
- Phase 3: Procedure for the selection of the articles
3. Barriers to a Sustainable Transportation Sector
3.1. Governance and Regulatory Barriers
3.2. Technological Barriers
3.3. Financial Barriers
3.4. Organizational Barriers
3.5. Social Barriers
4. Research and Development (R&D) Efforts
4.1. Alternative Fuels
4.2. Innovative Concepts for Sustainable Transportation
4.2.1. Public Transportation
4.2.2. Eco-Driving Practices
4.2.3. Connected Autonomous Vehicles
4.2.4. Transportation Infrastructure
- Infrastructure-based ITS: Uses sensors, cameras, and other devices to collect transportation data such as traffic, weather, and road conditions. These data are then used to improve the efficiency and safety of the transportation system.
- Vehicle-based ITS: Systems on board the vehicle that provide information and services to the driver.
- Cooperative ITS: The combination of infrastructure-based and vehicle-based ITS systems to provide even greater benefits. For example, traffic light timing could be adjusted to reduce congestion using data from traffic sensors. Similarly, cooperative ITSs could use vehicle data to warn other drivers of hazards.
4.2.5. Shared Transportation Systems
5. Policy Implications
- 7.
- Incentives for electric vehicles: Incentivizing electric vehicles (EVs) plays a critical role in encouraging their adoption and accelerating the transition to a more sustainable transportation system. These incentives make EVs more attractive to consumers by helping to offset the higher initial cost of EVs. They include purchase subsidies, tax credits, grants, reduced registration fees, incentives for workplace charging, and support for fleet electrification [146,147,148]. Such incentives can be tailored to the specific needs and circumstances of each region, taking into account factors such as local charging infrastructure, vehicle availability, and the policy framework.
- 8.
- Reinforcement of public transportation: As stated before, public transportation plays a key role in decarbonizing the transportation sector, reducing congestion, and promoting sustainable urban development [104]. The promotion of mass transit is supported by a wide range of policies that include improved funding and investment, integrated and efficient networks, land-use planning, real-time information and technology, and public awareness campaigns [105,112]. Improving public transportation performance requires infrastructure funding, effective planning, policy alignment, and community involvement [149].
- 9.
- Fuel efficiency standards: Fuel efficiency standards for passenger and goods transportation are important steps in achieving global climate change goals and energy savings in transportation [150]. Some practical aspects of fuel efficiency standards and their potential benefits should also be highlighted. These include stimulating technological innovation, delivering cost savings to consumers, enabling market transformation, and promoting international harmonization [151]. As the automotive industry evolves, fuel efficiency standards may need to be regularly updated in line with technological and environmental developments. Meanwhile, regulatory support for electric vehicles and other alternative fuels can complement fuel efficiency standards to achieve broader sustainability goals [152].
- 10.
- Active transportation promotion: The use of active transportation, such as walking and cycling, is one of the most important strategies for reducing emissions, improving public health, and creating more sustainable and livable cities [153]. There are many approaches and policies to promote active travel. These include infrastructure investment, bike sharing and rental programs, the integration of cycling with public transportation, and multimodal integration [154]. However, promoting active travel requires a comprehensive, holistic approach that takes into account urban planning, infrastructure, and public engagement [155]. For example, a project in New Zealand has demonstrated the potential for implementing cycling and walking initiatives to help reduce carbon emissions. This project resulted in a total cost of 13.1 million USD, of which approximately 85% was spent on infrastructure upgrades, such as improving sidewalks and bicycle lanes, and 15% on promotion and awareness, including campaigns to increase cycling and walking [156].
- 11.
- A modal shift for freight: The promotion of a modal shift in freight transportation involves encouraging the movement of goods from the most polluting and least efficient modes, such as road and air freight, to more sustainable and environmentally friendly modes, such as rail, sea, and intermodal transportation [112]. Shifting freight will require multiple actions, including investment in rail infrastructure, the development of intermodal facilities, improving last-mile delivery, incentives for sustainable fleet use, green freight certification programs, and regulatory support for freight efficiency [157,158]. In this context, a comprehensive and coordinated effort by a range of stakeholders, in particular government, transportation providers, urban planners, and consumers, is crucial [159,160]. For example, the German government reported in 2018 the approval of a program to support the modal shift of freight transportation from road to rail, with an annual budget of 350 million EUR until 2023. This program will have an environmental impact by significantly reducing carbon emissions. It also reduces congestion by decreasing medium- and heavy-duty vehicles on the roads [112]. Modal diversification combined with more sustainable transportation solutions can make freight transportation less polluting and supply chains more efficient [161].
- 12.
- Carbon-pricing mechanisms: Carbon pricing aims to reduce GHG emissions by imposing a cost on carbon dioxide and other GHGs emitted into the atmosphere. These costs provide financial incentives for individuals, businesses, and governments to reduce their carbon footprint by reflecting these emissions’ environmental and social impacts [112,162]. The two main approaches to carbon pricing are the carbon tax and the cap-and-trade system. Carbon taxes are direct taxes on the carbon content of conventional fuels, with the aim of making high-carbon fuels less attractive and encouraging consumers and companies to use clean and carbon-free transportation systems [163,164]. By contrast, cap-and-trade or emission trading schemes can be seen as another type of carbon pricing. They set a limit (cap) on the total amount of carbon emissions from vehicles and allow companies to buy and sell allowances within that cap. This provides an incentive for companies to reduce their emissions and encourages the development of cleaner transportation technologies [164,165]. To summarize, carbon-pricing mechanisms may be designed to meet national conditions, emission reduction goals, and economic considerations. Their effectiveness will depend on their design, their enforcement mechanisms, and their alignment with broader climate change and sustainable development strategies [166].
- 13.
- Collaboration and international agreements: International cooperation and agreements are critical to addressing the challenges and opportunities in the transportation sector, particularly environmental and economic issues with global implications. These include climate change agreements and targets, harmonized standards and regulations, technology transfer and sharing, and the development of global supply chains [167]. Such efforts address the interrelated challenges of transportation and its impact on global sustainability. They also enable countries to promote economic growth and environmental awareness by building on common strengths, sharing knowledge, and developing global solutions to complex transportation problems [168].
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Martínez, D.M.; Ebenhack, B.W.; Wagner, T.P. Chapter 7—Transportation sector energy efficiency. In Energy Efficiency; Martínez, D.M., Ebenhack, B.W., Wagner, T.P., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 197–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teske, S.; Niklas, S. Decarbonisation Pathways for Transport. In Achieving the Paris Climate Agreement Goals: Part 2: Science-Based Target Setting for the Finance Industry—Net-Zero Sectoral 1.5 °C Pathways for Real Economy Sectors; Teske, S., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 187–222. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.; Shafique, M.; Xiaowei, L. Literature review on life cycle assessment of transportation alternative fuels. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2023, 32, 103343. [Google Scholar]
- Herold, D.M.; Lee, K.-H. Carbon management in the logistics and transportation sector: An overview and new research directions. Carbon Manag. 2017, 8, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Energy Agency. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2019; IEA: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dambrane, L. The Prevalence of Energy-Related Rebound Effects in the Transportation Sector; University of Stavanger: Stavanger, Norway, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Pamucar, D.; Ecer, F.; Deveci, M. Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 788, 147763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National_Research_Council. Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; p. 394. [Google Scholar]
- Franco, S.; Mandla, V.R. Analysis of road transport energy consumption and emissions: A case study. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2014, 8, 341–355. [Google Scholar]
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Chapter 8—Transport; Cambridge University Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Pilli-Sihvola, K.; Nurmi, V.; Perrels, A.; Harjanne, A.; Bösch, P.; Ciari, F. Innovations in weather services as a crucial building block for climate change adaptation in road transport. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2016, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christodoulou, A.; Demirel, H. Impacts of Climate Change on Transport: A Focus on Airports, Seaports and Inland Waterways; Joint Research Service: Brussels, Belgium, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Aminzadegan, S.; Shahriari, M.; Mehranfar, F.; Abramović, B. Factors affecting the emission of pollutants in different types of transportation: A literature review. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 2508–2529. [Google Scholar]
- Teter, J. Tracking Transport 2022; IEA: Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Shaw, C.; Hales, S.; Howden-Chapman, P.; Edwards, R. Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies in the transport sector. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 427–433. [Google Scholar]
- Van Schalkwyk, M.C.I.; Mindell, J.S. Current issues in the impacts of transport on health. Br. Med. Bull. 2018, 125, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manisalidis, I.; Stavropoulou, E.; Stavropoulos, A.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandarkar, S. Vehicular pollution, their effect on human health and mitigation measures. VE 2013, 1, 3340. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammed, A.A.; Ambak, K.; Mosa, A.M.; Syamsunur, D. A review of traffic accidents and related practices worldwide. Open Transp. J. 2019, 13, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Litman, T. Transportation and public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2013, 34, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodrigue, J.-P.; Comtois, C.; Slack, B. The Geography of Transport Systems; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2016; pp. 1–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Transport Bridging Divides; OECD: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Xue, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Z. The Impacts of Transportation Infrastructure on Sustainable Development: Emerging Trends and Challenges. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forum, I.T. ITF Transport Outlook 2023; OECD: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corlu, C.G.; de la Torre, R.; Serrano-Hernandez, A.; Juan, A.A.; Faulin, J. Optimizing energy consumption in transportation: Literature review, insights, and research opportunities. Energies 2020, 13, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, C.; Wang, L.; Liu, B.; Yuan, Y.-H.; Tsai, S.-B. An Empirical Study for Green Transportation Scheme of Municipal Solid Waste Based on Complex Data Model Analysis. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6614312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Din, A.U.; Ur Rahman, I.; Vega-Muñoz, A.; Elahi, E.; Salazar-Sepúlveda, G.; Contreras-Barraza, N.; Alhrahsheh, R.R. How Sustainable Transportation Can Utilize Climate Change Technologies to Mitigate Climate Change. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajak, S.; Parthiban, P.; Dhanalakshmi, R. Sustainable transportation systems performance evaluation using fuzzy logic. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 71, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyons, G. Getting smart about urban mobility–aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2018, 115, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okoli, C. A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2015, 37, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hempel, S.; Xenakis, L.; Danz, M. Systematic Reviews for Occupational Safety and Health Questions; RAND Corporation: Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 1–88. [Google Scholar]
- Juntunen, M.; Lehenkari, M. A narrative literature review process for an academic business research thesis. Stud. High. Educ. 2021, 46, 330–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Selçuk, A.A. A guide for systematic reviews: PRISMA. Turk. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2019, 57, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lah, O. Decarbonizing the transportation sector: Policy options, synergies, and institutions to deliver on a low-carbon stabilization pathway. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2017, 6, e257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiadou, K.; Gavanas, N.; Pyrgidis, C.; Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M. Identifying and Prioritizing Sustainable Urban Mobility Barriers through a Modified Delphi-AHP Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, K.J.; Pan, S.-Y.; Lee, I.; Kim, H.; You, Z.; Zheng, J.-M.; Chiang, P.-C. Green transportation for sustainability: Review of current barriers, strategies, and innovative technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 326, 129392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okitasari, M.; Katramiz, T. The national development plans after the SDGs: Steering implications of the global goals towards national development planning. Earth Syst. Gov. 2022, 12, 100136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deakin, E. Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Forward, S.; Hylén, B.; Barta, D.; Czermański, E.; Åkerman, J.; Vesela, J.; Isaksson, K.; Dębicka, O.; Brand, R.; Hrebicek, Z. Challenges and Barriers for a Sustainable Transport System-State of the Art Report; Transforum: Cologne, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Acuto, M. City Leadership in Global Governance. Glob. Gov. 2013, 19, 481–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, J. What role for network governance in urban low carbon transitions? J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 50, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwedes, O.; Riedel, V.; Dziekan, K. Project planning vs. strategic planning: Promoting a different perspective for sustainable transport policy in European R&D projects. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2017, 5, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serafeim, G. Social-impact efforts that create real value. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2020, 98, 38–48. [Google Scholar]
- Atalla, G.; Mills, M.; McQueen, J. Six Ways that Governments Can Drive the Green Transition; Ernst & Young: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, J.; Chen, X.; Qiu, R.; Hou, S. Electric vehicle industry sustainable development with a stakeholder engagement system. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Pan, S.-Y.; Kim, H.; Linn, J.H.; Chiang, P.-C. Building green supply chains in eco-industrial parks towards a green economy: Barriers and strategies. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 162, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dincer, I.; Acar, C. A review on clean energy solutions for better sustainability. Int. J. Energy Res. 2015, 39, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadhas, A. Alternative Fuels for Transportation; Taylor & Francis Ltd.: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, N.D.S.A.; Roso, V.R.; Malaquias, A.C.T.; Baeta, J.G.C. Internal combustion engines and biofuels: Examining why this robust combination should not be ignored for future sustainable transportation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 148, 111292. [Google Scholar]
- Pustějovská, K.; Janovská, K.; Jursová, S. Alternative Sources of Energy in Transport: A Review. Processes 2023, 11, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alanazi, F. Electric Vehicles: Benefits, Challenges, and Potential Solutions for Widespread Adaptation. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, S.; Vicente, P.; Passos, A.M.; Costa, P.; Reis, E. Perceptions of the public transport service as a barrier to the adoption of public transport: A qualitative study. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominković, D.F.; Bačeković, I.; Pedersen, A.S.; Krajačić, G. The future of transportation in sustainable energy systems: Opportunities and barriers in a clean energy transition. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1823–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhikari, M.; Ghimire, L.; Kim, Y.; Aryal, P.; Khadka, S. Identification and analysis of barriers against electric vehicle use. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oladimeji, D.; Gupta, K.; Kose, N.A.; Gundogan, K.; Ge, L.; Liang, F. Smart transportation: An overview of technologies and applications. Sensors 2023, 23, 3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berger, G.; Feindt, P.H.; Holden, E.; Rubik, F. Sustainable mobility—Challenges for a complex transition. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2014, 16, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomomi, M.; Arisa, N.; Katsumi, T. Inappropriate driving behavior exhibited by drivers with the tendency of developmental disabilities. Heliyon 2022, 8, e12052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaber, A.; Hamadneh, J.; Csonka, B. The Preferences of Shared Micro-Mobility Users in Urban Areas. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 74458–74472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallo, M.; Marinelli, M. Sustainable mobility: A review of possible actions and policies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandaka, B.P.; Kumar, J. Alternative vehicular fuels for environmental decarbonization: A critical review of challenges in using electricity, hydrogen, and biofuels as a sustainable vehicular fuel. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2023, 14, 100442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvi, B.L.; Subramanian, K.A.; Panwar, N.L. Alternative fuels for transportation vehicles: A technical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 25, 404–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalghatgi, G. Development of Fuel/Engine Systems—The Way Forward to Sustainable Transport. Engineering 2019, 5, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Fulton, L. Future Electric Vehicle Production in the United States and Europe–Will It Be Enough; Institute of Transportation Studies: Davis, CA, SA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Dalena, F.; Senatore, A.; Marino, A.; Gordano, A.; Basile, M.; Basile, A. Methanol production and applications: An overview. In Methanol; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
- Amine, M.; Barakat, Y. Properties of gasoline-ethanol-methanol ternary fuel blend compared with ethanol-gasoline and methanol-gasoline fuel blends. Egypt. J. Pet. 2019, 28, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talupula, N.M.B.; Rao, P.S.; Kumar, B.S.P.; Praveen, C. Alternative fuels for internal combustion engines: Overview of current research. SSRG Int. J. Mech. Eng. 2017, 4, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, O.; Valera, H.; Dulani, D.; Krishnan, U.; Agarwal, A.K. Safety Aspects of Methanol as Fuel. In Methanol; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 117–138. [Google Scholar]
- Mueller, S.; Dennison, G.; Liu, S. An assessment on ethanol-blended gasoline/diesel fuels on cancer risk and mortality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, L. Chapter 11—Ethanol in Automotive Applications. In Ethanol; Basile, A., Iulianelli, A., Dalena, F., Veziroğlu, T.N., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çelebi, Y.; Aydın, H. An overview on the light alcohol fuels in diesel engines. Fuel 2019, 236, 890–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maheswari, P.; Haider, M.B.; Yusuf, M.; Klemeš, J.J.; Bokhari, A.; Beg, M.; Al-Othman, A.; Kumar, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. A review on latest trends in cleaner biodiesel production: Role of feedstock, production methods, and catalysts. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 335, 131588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuah, L.F.; Klemeš, J.J.; Bokhari, A.; Asif, S.; Cheng, Y.W.; Chong, C.C.; Show, P.L. A review of intensification technologies for biodiesel production. Biofuels Biorefining 2022, 2, 87–116. [Google Scholar]
- Aljaafari, A.; Fattah, I.; Jahirul, M.; Gu, Y.; Mahlia, T.; Islam, M.A.; Islam, M.S. Biodiesel Emissions: A State-of-the-Art Review on Health and Environmental Impacts. Energies 2022, 15, 6854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manigandan, S.; Gunasekar, P.; Devipriya, J.; Nithya, S. Emission and injection characteristics of corn biodiesel blends in diesel engine. Fuel 2019, 235, 723–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firoz, S. A review: Advantages and disadvantages of biodiesel. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2017, 4, 530–533. [Google Scholar]
- Basri, S.; Kamarudin, S.K. Direct dimethyl ether fuel cells (DDMEFCs). In Direct Liquid Fuel Cells; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 177–189. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.H.; Lee, C.S. Applicability of dimethyl ether (DME) in a compression ignition engine as an alternative fuel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 86, 848–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, P.; Singh, P.K.; Adhya, T.K.; Pattnaik, R.; Mishra, S. A critical review on prospects and challenges in production of biomethanol from lignocellulose biomass. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021, 12, 1835–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepanenko, D.; Kneba, Z. DME as alternative fuel for compression ignition engines—A review. Combust. Engines 2019, 58, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patten, J.; McWha, T. Dimethyl Ether Fuel Literature Review; Automotive and Surface Transportation; National Research Council Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Putrasari, Y.; Lim, O. Dimethyl ether as the next generation fuel to control nitrogen oxides and particulate matter emissions from internal combustion engines: A review. ACS Omega 2021, 7, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahadori, A. Natural Gas Processing: Technology and Engineering Design; Gulf Professional Publishing: Houston, TX, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Raslavičius, L.; Keršys, A.; Mockus, S.; Keršienė, N.; Starevičius, M. Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) as a medium-term option in the transition to sustainable fuels and transport. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, K. Experimental study on the performance of a liquefied petroleum gas engine according to the air fuel ratio. Fuel 2021, 303, 121330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmani, R. LPG gas leakage detection & control system. Bonfring Int. J. Softw. Eng. Soft Comput. 2016, 6, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M.I.; Yasmin, T.; Shakoor, A. Technical overview of compressed natural gas (CNG) as a transportation fuel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.I.; Yasmin, T.; Khan, N.B. Safety issues associated with the use and operation of natural gas vehicles: Learning from accidents in Pakistan. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2016, 38, 2481–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felseghi, R.-A.; Carcadea, E.; Raboaca, M.S.; Trufin, C.N.; Filote, C. Hydrogen fuel cell technology for the sustainable future of stationary applications. Energies 2019, 12, 4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeedmanesh, A.; Mac Kinnon, M.A.; Brouwer, J. Hydrogen is essential for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 12, 166–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deb, M.; Paul, A.; Debroy, D.; Sastry, G.; Panua, R.S.; Bose, P. An experimental investigation of performance-emission trade off characteristics of a CI engine using hydrogen as dual fuel. Energy 2015, 85, 569–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marnellos, G.E.; Klassen, T. Welcome to Hydrogen—A New International and Interdisciplinary Open Access Journal of Growing Interest in Our Society. Hydrogen 2020, 1, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veres, J.; Ochodek, T.; Kolonicny, J. Safety Aspects of Hydrogen Fuelling Stations. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2022, 91, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
- Capata, R.; Calabria, A. High-Performance Electric/Hybrid Vehicle—Environmental, Economic and Technical Assessments of Electrical Accumulators for Sustainable Mobility. Energies 2022, 15, 2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanguesa, J.A.; Torres-Sanz, V.; Garrido, P.; Martinez, F.J.; Marquez-Barja, J.M. A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 372–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Un-Noor, F.; Padmanaban, S.; Mihet-Popa, L.; Mollah, M.N.; Hossain, E. A Comprehensive Study of Key Electric Vehicle (EV) Components, Technologies, Challenges, Impacts, and Future Direction of Development. Energies 2017, 10, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkins, T.R.; Singh, B.; Majeau-Bettez, G.; Strømman, A.H. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J. Ind. Ecol. 2013, 17, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christensen, P.A.; Anderson, P.A.; Harper, G.D.; Lambert, S.M.; Mrozik, W.; Rajaeifar, M.A.; Wise, M.S.; Heidrich, O. Risk management over the life cycle of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 148, 111240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detter, H. Satisfying transportation needs in fast-growing metropolitan areas: Mobility solutions for mega-cities in developing countries. OPEC Energy Rev. 2015, 39, 418–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamurcu, M.; Eren, T. Electric Bus Selection with Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Green Transportation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Litman, T. Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs: Best Practices Guidebook; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Jelti, F.; Allouhi, A.; Al-Ghamdi, S.G.; Saadani, R.; Jamil, A.; Rahmoune, M. Environmental life cycle assessment of alternative fuels for city buses: A case study in Oujda city, Morocco. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 25308–25319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannan, M.A.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Hussain, A.; Mohamed, A. A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 834–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietrzak, K.; Pietrzak, O. Environmental Effects of Electromobility in a Sustainable Urban Public Transport. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oeschger, G.; Carroll, P.; Caulfield, B. Micromobility and public transport integration: The current state of knowledge. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 89, 102628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Ng, E.C.Y.; Zhou, J.; Surawski, N.; Chan, E.; Hong, G. Eco-driving technology for sustainable road transport: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 596–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fafoutellis, P.; Mantouka, E.G.; Vlahogianni, E.I. Eco-Driving and Its Impacts on Fuel Efficiency: An Overview of Technologies and Data-Driven Methods. Sustainability 2021, 13, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, M.S.; McNabola, A. A critical review and assessment of Eco-Driving policy & technology: Benefits & limitations. Transp. Policy 2014, 35, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
- Grosso, R.; Dougherty, C.; Ooms, A. Connected & Automated Vehicle Working Group Strategic Plan; Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities: Juneau, AK, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Leminen, S.; Rajahonka, M.; Wendelin, R.; Westerlund, M.; Nyström, A.-G. Autonomous vehicle solutions and their digital servitization business models. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 185, 122070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Othman, K. Exploring the implications of autonomous vehicles: A comprehensive review. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2022, 7, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noussan, M.; Hafner, M.; Tagliapietra, S. The Future of Transport between Digitalization and Decarbonization: Trends, Strategies and Effects on Energy Consumption; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Biswas, A.; Wang, H.-C. Autonomous vehicles enabled by the integration of IoT, edge intelligence, 5G, and blockchain. Sensors 2023, 23, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tengilimoglu, O.; Carsten, O.; Wadud, Z. Implications of automated vehicles for physical road environment: A comprehensive review. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2023, 169, 102989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovačić, M.; Mutavdžija, M.; Buntak, K. New paradigm of sustainable urban mobility: Electric and autonomous vehicles—A review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koshimova, M.A. Mechanism of state financial support in modernization of road-transport infrastructure of the country. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 125–127. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, F.; Shah, Z.; Al-Fagih, L. Applications of evolutionary game theory in urban road transport network: A state of the art review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 98, 104791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Streimikiene, D.; Baležentis, T.; Baležentienė, L. Comparative assessment of road transport technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 20, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Jia, Y. Intelligent transportation system for sustainable environment in smart cities. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finogeev, A.; Finogeev, A.; Shevchenko, S. Monitoring of Road Transport Infrastructure for the Intelligent Environment Smart Road. In Proceedings of the Creativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science, Volgograd, Russia, 12–14 September 2017; pp. 655–668. [Google Scholar]
- Taiebat, M.; Xu, M. Synergies of four emerging technologies for accelerated adoption of electric vehicles: Shared mobility, wireless charging, vehicle-to-grid, and vehicle automation. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 230, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taiebat, M.; Stolper, S.; Xu, M. Forecasting the Impact of Connected and Automated Vehicles on Energy Use: A Microeconomic Study of Induced Travel and Energy Rebound. Appl. Energy 2019, 247, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, A. Possibilities and Challenges for the Inclusion of the Electric Vehicle (EV) to Reduce the Carbon Footprint in the Transport Sector: A Review. Energies 2020, 13, 2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatti, A.R.; Salam, Z.; Aziz, M.J.B.A.; Yee, K.P.; Ashique, R.H. Electric vehicles charging using photovoltaic: Status and technological review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robin, C. Shared Mobility Principles for Livable Cities. 2017. Available online: https://www.sharedmobilityprinciples.org/ (accessed on 27 July 2022).
- Shaheen, S.; Cohen, A.; Zohdy, I. Shared Mobility: Current Practices and Guiding Principles; U.S. Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- SAE. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Shared Mobility and Enabling Technologies; SAE International Warrendale: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Turoń, K.; Kubik, A. Open Innovation in the Shared Mobility Market. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guyader, H.; Friman, M.; Olsson, L.E. Shared Mobility: Evolving Practices for Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, C.A.S.; De Salles Hue, N.P.; Berssaneti, F.T.; Quintanilha, J.A. An Overview of Shared Mobility. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, G. Sustainability and Shared Mobility Models. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, H.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, Y. Analysis of the Integration Usage Patterns of Multiple Shared Mobility Modes and Metro System. Transp. Res. Rec. 2021, 2675, 876–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenzie, G. Urban mobility in the sharing economy: A spatiotemporal comparison of shared mobility services. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2020, 79, 101418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourad, A.; Puchinger, J.; Chu, C. A survey of models and algorithms for optimizing shared mobility. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2019, 123, 323–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, J.; Becker, H.; Bösch, P.M.; Axhausen, K.W. Autonomous vehicles: The next jump in accessibilities? Res. Transp. Econ. 2017, 62, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.D.; Kockelman, K.M.; Hanna, J.P. Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2016, 94, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krueger, R.; Rashidi, T.H.; Rose, J.M. Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 69, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thilakshan, T.; Bandara, J. Identification of relevant sustainable transportation links to sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the national context. Education 2019, 10, 341–348. [Google Scholar]
- Taiebat, M.; Brown, A.L.; Safford, H.R.; Qu, S.; Xu, M. A review on energy, environmental, and sustainability implications of connected and automated vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 11449–11465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maheshwari, P.; Khaddar, R.; Kachroo, P.; Paz, A. Dynamic modeling of performance indices for planning of sustainable transportation systems. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2016, 16, 371–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, F. From willingness to action: Do push-pull-mooring factors matter for shifting to green transportation? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 79, 102242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holden, E.; Banister, D.; Gössling, S.; Gilpin, G.; Linnerud, K. Grand Narratives for sustainable mobility: A conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020, 65, 101454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Schmöcker, J.-D.; Bergstad, C.J.; Fujii, S.; Gärling, T. The influence of personality on acceptability of sustainable transport policies. Transportation 2014, 41, 855–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Blas, I.; Mediavilla, M.; Capellán-Pérez, I.; Duce, C. The limits of transport decarbonization under the current growth paradigm. Energy Strategy Rev. 2020, 32, 100543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hainsch, K. Identifying policy areas for the transition of the transportation sector. Energy Policy 2023, 178, 113591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langbroek, J.H.; Franklin, J.P.; Susilo, Y.O. The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy 2016, 94, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardman, S.; Chandan, A.; Tal, G.; Turrentine, T. The effectiveness of financial purchase incentives for battery electric vehicles–A review of the evidence. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 1100–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LaMonaca, S.; Ryan, L. The state of play in electric vehicle charging services–A review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saif, M.A.; Zefreh, M.M.; Torok, A. Public transport accessibility: A literature review. Period. Polytech. Transp. Eng. 2019, 47, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahlia, T.; Tohno, S.; Tezuka, T. International experience on incentive program in support of fuel economy standards and labelling for motor vehicle: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 25, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, S.; Lin, Z.; Wang, C.R.; Davis, S.; Jiang, S.; Hilliard, M.; Hwang, H.-L.; Hao, X.; Yu, R. Improving the effectiveness and equity of fuel economy regulations with sales adjustment factors. Iscience 2022, 25, 104902. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Miao, Q. The impact of the corporate average fuel economy standards on technological changes in automobile fuel efficiency. Resour. Energy Econ. 2021, 63, 101211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, P. Sustainable Transportation Planning: Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Urban Areas. Empir. Quests Manag. Essences 2021, 1, 116–129. [Google Scholar]
- Kłos, M.J.; Sierpiński, G. Building a model of integration of urban sharing and public transport services. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3086. [Google Scholar]
- Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; A review of the current evidence. Environ. Int. 2020, 140, 105661. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Keall, M.; Chapman, R.; Shaw, C.; Abrahamse, W.; Howden-Chapman, P. Are people who already cycle and walk more responsive to an active travel intervention? J. Transp. Health 2018, 10, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaack, L.H.; Vaishnav, P.; Morgan, M.G.; Azevedo, I.L.; Rai, S. Decarbonizing intraregional freight systems with a focus on modal shift. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 083001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Esposito, E.; Shashi. Evaluating environmental sustainability strategies in freight transport and logistics industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 1563–1574. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, J.; Dodson, J.; Hall, P.V. Planning for urban freight transport: An overview. Transp. Rev. 2015, 35, 583–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Pira, M.; Tavasszy, L.A.; de Almeida Correia, G.H.; Ignaccolo, M.; Inturri, G. Opportunities for integration between Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and freight transport: A conceptual model. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 74, 103212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Anbanandam, R. Assessment of environmental and social sustainability performance of the freight transportation industry: An index-based approach. Transp. Policy 2022, 124, 43–60. [Google Scholar]
- Waisman, H.-D.; Guivarch, C.; Lecocq, F. The transportation sector and low-carbon growth pathways: Modelling urban, infrastructure, and spatial determinants of mobility. Clim. Policy 2013, 13, 106–129. [Google Scholar]
- Agnolucci, P.; Fischer, C.; Heine, D.; de Oca, M.M.; Patroni, K.; Pryor, J.; Hallegatte, S. Measuring Total Carbon Pricing; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Yeh, S.; Witcover, J.; Lade, G.E.; Sperling, D. A review of low carbon fuel policies: Principles, program status and future directions. Energy Policy 2016, 97, 220–234. [Google Scholar]
- Zakeri, A.; Dehghanian, F.; Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J. Carbon pricing versus emissions trading: A supply chain planning perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 164, 197–205. [Google Scholar]
- Khurshid, A.; Khan, K.; Chen, Y.; Cifuentes-Faura, J. Do green transport and mitigation technologies drive OECD countries to sustainable path? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2023, 118, 103669. [Google Scholar]
- Eliasson, J.; Proost, S. Is sustainable transport policy sustainable? Transp. Policy 2015, 37, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aloui, A.; Hamani, N.; Derrouiche, R.; Delahoche, L. Systematic literature review on collaborative sustainable transportation: Overview, analysis and perspectives. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2021, 9, 100291. [Google Scholar]
Inclusion | Exclusion |
---|---|
Period: 2013–July 2023 | Duplicates Not including conference proceedings |
Language: English | |
Articles in scientific journals and books |
Technical Concerns | Environmental Concerns | Safety Concerns | |
---|---|---|---|
Methanol (methyl alcohol) | Methanol is mainly derived from natural gas, but also from coal or biomass [65]. The most common use of methanol as a fuel is a blend with gasoline referred to as M85 (85% methanol, 15% gasoline); however, pure methanol, referred to as M100, can also be used [66]. | A key feature that makes methanol vehicles greener than petrol is their improved environmental performance. For example, M85 vehicles are expected to emit 30–50% less harmful ozone-depleting emissions. However, they generally emit about the same amount of CO as petrol cars [67]. | Methanol used as a fuel is considered toxic and highly flammable and leads to adverse effects on human health, including skin and eye irritation and respiratory and central nervous system damage [68]. |
Ethanol (ethyl alcohol) | Ethanol is suitable for automotive fuel. It is produced from sugar as a by-product and can be considered a sustainable fuel due to its use of renewable resources. Ethanol production is based on different production processes, mainly on the energy inputs used during distillation and other processes [62]. | It is considered one of the best ways of reducing tailpipe emissions [69]. It is more volatile than gasoline and therefore evaporates more easily. This can lead to the generation of ground-level ozone and smog [70]. | The risk of catastrophic burns from ethanol explosions causing skin, facial, and nerve damage is a major concern. Both short- and long-term health effects are also possible with ethanol; in particular, short-term signs of inhalation poisoning, headaches, breathing difficulties, and eye irritation have been observed [71]. |
Biodiesel | Biodiesel refers to synthetic diesel fuel developed from renewable feedstocks, like vegetable oils and animal waste. It is compatible with current diesel vehicles requiring only minor modifications [72]. Biodiesel is classified as a fatty acid mono-alkyl ester and is obtained through transesterification processes. However, one of its main limitations is its higher cost compared with conventional diesel [73]. | The use of biodiesel results in higher NOx emissions than conventional diesel, but less carbon emissions and particulate matter (PM) [74]. Biodiesel is, therefore, considered an alternative to petroleum and coal, as it helps to reduce GHG emissions [75]. | The low sensitivity of biodiesel to atmospheric conditions and its high energy content makes it safer than petroleum fuels. However, the higher energy content of all liquid fuels means that there is a risk of ignition when they are stored or transported [76]. |
Dimethyl ether (DME) | DME is also known as methoxymethane, wood ether, and methyl ether. It is a colorless, non-toxic, and highly flammable gas under ambient conditions and can be transported as a liquid under low pressure [77]. It is particularly suitable for replacing conventional fuels in vehicles because it has similar properties to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) [78]. DME can be produced directly from synthesis gas made from natural gas, coal, or biomass. It can also be produced indirectly from methanol via dehydration [79]. | DME is designed as a clean fuel with improved energy performance and a significant reduction in the amount of PM, SOx, HCs, CO, and noise when compared to conventional oil-based fuels [80]. | DME can have some hazardous effects through inhalation, while liquid DME can cause serious skin burn damage [81]. The risk of leakage is high with DME-based fuel in high-pressure storage systems because DME is kept in the liquid phase and adequate flow is maintained in the fuel system [82]. |
Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) | LPG refers to a blend of specific hydrocarbons that are maintained in the liquid phase under ambient temperature and pressure. Primary feedstocks include hydrocarbons typically based on refined products, natural gas processing, and lighter hydrocarbon cracking processes [83]. The storage of LPG is carried out in cylinders, mainly in liquid form, under a pressure of ≈760–1030 kPa. These cylinders are manufactured in different sizes to match different vehicles [84]. | Using LPG as an alternative fuel is one of the cleanest conventional fuels on the market. It generates fewer carbon emissions than petrol and diesel. So, it does help reduce overall CO2 emissions [85]. | The leakage of LPG can be in the form of a gaseous or liquid leak. In case of a liquid leak, it vaporizes immediately and forms a relatively large gas cloud dropping to the ground, given that it has a higher density than air. If there is a risk of contact with an ignition source, the gas may burn or explode [86]. |
Compressed natural gas (CNG) | CNG is produced by the compression of conventional natural gas, which consists mainly of methane. It is stored and distributed under pressure at 2900–3600 psi using, usually, metal cylinders [87]. | CNG is an alternative fuel for vehicles. Compared to other fuels, it has the lowest emissions and contains significantly fewer air pollutants than diesel. This means that CNG consistently leads to savings compared with diesel [87]. | CNG can be used as a safe fuel due to its safety characteristics. The risk of leakage is negligible because it is stored safely in high-quality certified cylinders. In case of a leak, CNG will be released into the atmosphere and will be mixed easily and homogeneously, which affects human health [88]. |
Hydrogen | Hydrogen can be generated from a wide range of primary energies (natural gas, biogas, sewage gas, and others) using different methods, such as electrolysis and natural gas reforming/gasification [89]. The use of hydrogen is considered a future sustainable energy and therefore an innovative and technological development opportunity to achieve energy efficiency [90]. | The combustion of hydrogen is practically free of pollutant emissions, especially when using renewable energy [91]. This makes hydrogen a safe energy source and helps prevent harmful GHG emissions within the overall energy system [92]. | As with all combustible gases, there are two critical safety considerations with hydrogen. First, adequate ventilation is needed to prevent accumulation, reducing the risk of flammable hydrogen gas being released into enclosed spaces in the event of a leak. Second, effective leak detection is important, involving the installation of flammable gas or hydrogen detectors in storage areas [93]. |
Electricity | Unlike internal combustion engines, electric vehicles (EVs) are operated by an electric motor. They are powered by a battery that needs to be recharged when the vehicle is not in use [94]. However, the main issues with EVs are their limited range and refueling concerns, which take considerably longer than conventional vehicles [95,96]. | The environmental impact of EVs over their lifetime is much lower than that of gasoline or diesel vehicles. However, their impact is not negligible. The operation of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) results in zero emissions during the use phase, but may result in the generation of CO2 emissions from the electricity source used to power them [97]. | The most serious safety concerns associated with EVs relate to the risk of batteries exploding and releasing harmful and toxic chemicals if not maintained and operated according to the manufacturer’s standards. Considerable diversity exists in battery design for EVs and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) among manufacturers. Therefore, it is important to be aware of specific information regarding manufacturers and vehicles to ensure safe operation [98]. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jelti, F.; Allouhi, A.; Tabet Aoul, K.A. Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115457
Jelti F, Allouhi A, Tabet Aoul KA. Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review. Sustainability. 2023; 15(21):15457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115457
Chicago/Turabian StyleJelti, Faissal, Amine Allouhi, and Kheira Anissa Tabet Aoul. 2023. "Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review" Sustainability 15, no. 21: 15457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115457
APA StyleJelti, F., Allouhi, A., & Tabet Aoul, K. A. (2023). Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 15(21), 15457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115457