The Impact of New Energy Vehicle Product Attributes on Consumer Purchase Intention in the Backdrop of Sustainable Development Goals
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Basis and Research Hypothesis
2.1. Product Attributes and Purchase Intention
- (1)
- Product attributes
- (2)
- Purchase intention
2.2. Product Attributes and Perceived Value
2.3. Perceived Value and Purchase Intention
2.4. Mediating Effect of Perceived Value
2.5. Moderating Effect of Citizens’ Environmental Awareness
3. Study design
3.1. Variable Measurement
- (1)
- Product Attribute (PA)
- (2)
- Perceived Value (PV)
- (3)
- Purchase Intention (PI)
- (4)
- Environmental awareness (EA)
3.2. Questionnaire Structure
3.3. Data Collection
4. Empirical Analysis and Hypothesis Testing
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Structural Equation Modeling and Model Fit Test
4.3. Standardized Path Coefficient Test
4.4. Testing of Mediating Effect
4.5. Testing of Moderating Effect
5. Discussion and Implications
5.1. Discussion of the Results
5.2. Implications
5.3. Limitations and Future Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dusmanescu, D.; Andrei, J.; Popescu, G.H.; Nica, E.; Panait, M. Heuristic Methodology for Estimating the Liquid Biofuel Potential of a Region. Energies 2016, 9, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Voica, M.C. Green Investments—Between Necessity, Fiscal Constraints and Profit. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 22, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Popescu, G.H.; Andrei, J.V.; Nica, E.; Mieilă, M.; Panait, M. Analysis on the impact of investments, energy use and domestic material consumption in changing the romanian economic paradigm. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2019, 25, 59–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shi, L.; Wu, R.; Lin, B. Where Will Go for Electric Vehicles in China after the Government Subsidy Incentives Are Abolished? A Controversial Consumer Perspective. Energy 2023, 262, 125423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Pan, H.; Zheng, W. Assessment of the Incentives on Electric Vehicle Promotion in China. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2017, 101, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yong, J.Y.; Ramachandaramurthy, V.K.; Tan, K.M.; Mithulananthan, N. A Review on the State-of-the-Art Technologies of Electric Vehicle, Its Impacts and Prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 49, 365–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Zhan, W.; Hu, Y. Consumer Purchase Intention of Electric Vehicles in China: The Roles of Perception and Personality. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 204, 1060–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Liang, C.; Ye, F.; Zhao, X. Designing Government Subsidy Schemes to Promote the Electric Vehicle Industry: A System Dynamics Model Perspective. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2023, 167, 103558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okada, T.; Tamaki, T.; Managi, S. Effect of Environmental Awareness on Purchase Intention and Satisfaction Pertaining to Electric Vehicles in Japan. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2019, 67, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, C.; He, Z. Product Attributes in the Domain of Marketing: Review, Application and Prospects. J. Hubei Univ. Econ. 2017, 15, 87–92. [Google Scholar]
- Dhar, R.; Wertenbroch, K. Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. J. Mark. Res. 2000, 37, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyazaki, A.D.; Grewal, D.; Goodstein, R.C. The Effect of Multiple Extrinsic Cues on Quality Perceptions: A Matter of Consistency. J. Consum. Res. 2005, 32, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, Y.; Jing, F.; Che, X. Research on the influence mechanism of attribute preference of durable consumer goods on consumer dynamic satisfaction—Taking automobile as an example. Enterp. Econ. 2017, 36, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, R.J.; Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Contemporary Sociology. 1977, 6, 244. [Google Scholar]
- Han, R.; Tian, Z. Effects of Alternative Promotion Types on Consumers’ Value Perception and Purchase Intentions. J. Manag. Sci. 2005, 18, 85–91. [Google Scholar]
- Dodds, W.B. An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Price, Brand and Store Information on the Subjective Evaluation of Products. Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, L. Study on the Influence of Product Attributes to Purchase Inclination in Family Car. Master’s Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, S.; Hu, Z.; Yao, Q.; Jiao, W. The Effect of Functional Attributes and Brand Personality on Consumers’ Purchase Decision for Family Cars. J. Beijing Inst. Technol. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2014, 16, 76–83+91. [Google Scholar]
- Heffner, R.R.; Kurani, K.S.; Turrentine, T.S. Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2007, 12, 396–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schuitema, G.; Anable, J.; Skippon, S.; Kinnear, N. The Role of Instrumental, Hedonic and Symbolic Attributes in the Intention to Adopt Electric Vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2013, 48, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Liu, D.; Zhang, H. On the Relations Among Brand Characteristic, Consumer Self-Concept and Purchase Intention—A Case Study of Automobile Industry in Taibei. Reform. Strategy 2008, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, M.E. Competitive Advantage; Peking University Press: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodruff, R.B. Customer Value: The next Source for Competitive Advantage. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1997, 25, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, J.N.; Newman, B.I.; Gross, B.L. Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values. J. Bus. Res. 1991, 22, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweeney, J.C.; Soutar, G.N. Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozturk, A.B.; Nusair, K.; Okumus, F.; Hua, N. The Role of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Users’ Continued Usage Intention in a Mobile Hotel Booking Environment. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 57, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, M.; Bonn, M.A.; Moon, S.; Chang, H. (Sean) Home Chef Meal Kits: Product Attributes, Perceived Value and Repurchasing Intentions the Moderating Effects of Household Configuration. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 45, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, D.; Monroe, K.B.; Krishnan, R. The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions. J. Mark. 1998, 62, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodds, W.B.; Monroe, K.B.; Grewal, D. Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. J. Mark. Res. 1991, 28, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X. Research on the influence mechanism of consumer perceived quality on online purchase intention. J. Commer. Econ. 2019, 6, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
- San Consumers’ Perceived Quality, Perceived Value and Perceived Risk Towards Purchase Decision on Automobile. Am. J. Econ. Bus. Adm. 2011, 3, 47–57. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dewanti, R.; Pratiwi, V.I.; Chang, A. The Success of Toto Brand in Grabbing Purchase Intention. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2016, 24, 191–202. [Google Scholar]
- Kato, T. Functional Value vs Emotional Value: A Comparative Study of the Values That Contribute to a Preference for a Corporate Brand. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2021, 1, 100024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadenne, D.; Sharma, B.; Kerr, D.; Smith, T. The Influence of Consumers’ Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes on Energy Saving Behaviours. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 7684–7694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skallerud, K.; Armbrecht, J.; Tuu, H. Intentions to Consume Sustainably Produced Fish: The Moderator Effects of Involvement and Environmental Awareness. Sustainability 2021, 13, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y. The influence of automobile product attributes on consumers’ purchase intention. Master’s Thesis, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, R.; Ding, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Jiang, X.; Sun, W.; Wang, D.; Mou, Y.; Liu, M. The Relationship between Symbolic Meanings and Adoption Intention of Electric Vehicles in China: The Moderating Effects of Consumer Self-Identity and Face Consciousness. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 288, 125116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J. Research on the Influence of Customer Perceived Value on the Purchase Intention of New Energy vehicles. Master’s Thesis, Donghua University, Shanghai, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Carlsson, -K.; Annika, L.; Anna, -L.; Eriksson, B. Residential energy behavior: Does generation matter? Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2005, 29, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Zheng, L. Consumer Community Cognition, Brand Loyalty, and Behaviour Intentions within Online Publishing Communities: An Empirical Study of Epubit in China. Learn. Publ. 2021, 34, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, N. The Influencing Outcomes of Job Engagement: An Interpretation from the Social Exchange Theory. IJPPM 2018, 67, 873–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Zhao, M.; Lin, H.; Yang, L. How Do Consumer Innovation Characteristics and Consumption Value Shape Users’ Willingness to Buy Innovative Car Safety Seats? Sustainability 2022, 15, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.K.; Zhongjun, T.; Sattar, A.; XinHao, Z. Consumer’s Intention to Purchase 5G: Do Environmental Awareness, Environmental Knowledge and Health Consciousness Attitude Matter? Technol. Soc. 2021, 65, 101563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Characteristics | Eigenvalue | Number of Samples | Percentage | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 226 | 53.43% | Annual household income level (RMB) | <250,000 | 97 | 22.93% |
Female | 197 | 46.57% | 250,000–300,000 | 107 | 25.30% | ||
Age | <25 | 71 | 16.78% | 300,000–400,000 | 136 | 32.15% | |
25–35 | 141 | 33.33% | >400,000 | 83 | 19.62% | ||
36–45 | 127 | 30.03% | Occupation | Company staff | 215 | 50.83% | |
46–50 | 53 | 12.53% | Private owners | 55 | 13.00% | ||
Over 50 | 31 | 7.33% | Staff of government agencies/institutions | 78 | 18.44% | ||
Usual place of residence | First-tier cities | 175 | 41.37% | Freelance | 44 | 10.40% | |
Second-tier cities | 142 | 33.57% | Others | 31 | 7.33% | ||
Third- and fourth-tier cities | 69 | 16.31% | Types of new energy vehicles considered or purchased | Pure electric vehicle | 185 | 43.74% | |
Others | 37 | 8.75% | Hybrid electric vehicle | 164 | 38.77% | ||
Education level | High school or below | 84 | 19.86% | Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles | 54 | 12.76% | |
Junior college | 101 | 23.88% | Others | 20 | 4.73% | ||
Undergraduate | 124 | 29.31% | |||||
Master and above | 114 | 26.95% |
Mean | Sd | FA | SA | QV | EV | PV | SV | PI | EA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | 3.544 | 0.510 | 1.000 | |||||||
SA | 3.557 | 0.530 | −0.025 | 1.000 | ||||||
QV | 3.545 | 0.494 | 0.185 *** | 0.106 * | 1.000 | |||||
EV | 3.532 | 0.388 | 0.225 *** | 0.121 ** | 0.061 | 1.000 | ||||
PV | 3.510 | 0.522 | 0.215 *** | 0.091 * | 0.057 | 0.068 | 1.000 | |||
SV | 3.467 | 0.546 | 0.110 ** | 0.153 ** | 0.175 *** | 0.013 | 0.043 | 1.000 | ||
PI | 3.695 | 0.686 | 0.294 *** | 0.217 *** | 0.261 *** | 0.232 *** | 0.258 *** | 0.272 *** | 1.000 | |
EA | 3.566 | 0.584 | 0.090 *** | −0.046 | −0.030 | 0.003 | 0.117 | 0.023 | 0.160 *** | 1.000 |
Variable Name | Dimension | Title Number | Evaluation Content | Cronbach’s α | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product attributes | Functional attributes | FA1 | New energy vehicles require lower fuel consumption. | 0.81 | 0.809 | 0.460 |
FA2 | The battery of new energy vehicles has stronger endurance. | |||||
FA3 | New energy vehicles have sufficient power. | |||||
FA4 | New energy vehicles are safer. | |||||
FA5 | New energy vehicles generate less noise when driving. | |||||
Symbolic attribute | SA1 | Driving a new energy vehicle can show others that I care about the environment. | 0.79 | 0.795 | 0.473 | |
SA2 | Driving a new energy vehicle can show others that I am contributing to reducing carbon emissions. | |||||
SA3 | Driving a new energy vehicle can show others that I enjoy the benefits of technological innovation. | |||||
SA4 | Driving a new energy vehicle can show others that I am at the forefront of innovation. | |||||
Perceived value | Quality value | QV1 | New energy vehicles bear stable quality. | 0.84 | 0.836 | 0.508 |
QV2 | The quality level of new energy vehicles is acceptable. | |||||
QV3 | New energy vehicles are well made. | |||||
QV4 | New energy vehicles generate fewer failures. | |||||
QV5 | New energy vehicles have longer operating life. | |||||
Emotional value | EV1 | Driving a new energy vehicle makes me feel happy. | 0.81 | 0.861 | 0.512 | |
EV2 | Driving a new energy vehicle makes me feel at ease. | |||||
EV3 | Driving a new energy vehicle makes me feel comfortable. | |||||
EV4 | I feel good when I drive a new energy vehicle. | |||||
Price value | PV1 | New energy vehicles reduce fuel consumption and maintenance costs, which is economically reasonable in the long run. | 0.75 | 0.750 | 0.502 | |
PV2 | The country provides certain financial subsidies, which makes me feel that the price is within the acceptable range. | |||||
PV3 | New energy vehicles provide value that matches their price. | |||||
Perceived value | Social value | SV1 | Driving a new energy vehicle can show personality. | 0.83 | 0.825 | 0.486 |
SV2 | Driving a new energy vehicle can leave a good impression on others. | |||||
SV3 | Driving a new energy vehicle can improve other people’s perception of me. | |||||
SV4 | Driving a new energy vehicle gives me social recognition. | |||||
SV5 | Driving a new energy vehicle can make others feel that I am socially responsible. | |||||
Purchase intention | Purchase intention | PI1 | I will consider buying a new energy vehicle. | 0.80 | 0.804 | 0.578 |
PI2 | I am willing to buy a new energy vehicle. | |||||
PI3 | I am happy to recommend others to buy new energy vehicles. | |||||
Citizens’ environmental awareness | Citizens’ environmental awareness | EA1 | I think saving energy is very important for environmental protection. | 0.84 | 0.838 | 0.564 |
EA2 | I think it is important to buy environmentally friendly products for environmental protection. | |||||
EA3 | I will avoid buying products that pollute the environment. | |||||
EA4 | When I have to make a choice between two equivalent products, I will choose the one that is less harmful to the environment. |
Path | Standardized Path Coefficients | S.E. | P | Whether Hypothesis Is Supported |
---|---|---|---|---|
Functional Attributes → Purchase Intention | 0.205 | 0.070 | ** | Yes |
Symbolic Attributes → Purchase Intention | 0.159 | 0.061 | ** | Yes |
Functional Attributes → Quality Value | 0.225 | 0.059 | *** | Yes |
Functional Attributes → Emotional Value | 0.295 | 0.067 | *** | Yes |
Function Attributes → Price Value | 0.305 | 0.067 | *** | Yes |
Functional Attributes → Social Value | 0.145 | 0.057 | * | Yes |
Symbolic Attributes → Quality Value | 0.135 | 0.057 | * | Yes |
Symbolic Attributes → Emotional Value | 0.158 | 0.061 | ** | Yes |
Symbolic Attributes → Price Value | 0.130 | 0.062 | * | Yes |
Symbolic Attributes → Social Value | 0.182 | 0.056 | ** | Yes |
Quality Value → Purchase Intention | 0.221 | 0.069 | *** | Yes |
Emotional Value → Purchase Intention | 0.189 | 0.063 | ** | Yes |
Price Value → Purchase Intention | 0.245 | 0.067 | *** | Yes |
Social Value → Purchase Intention | 0.273 | 0.069 | *** | Yes |
Indirect Effect | Boot.Est | Boot.S.E. | Boot.LLCI | Boot.ULCI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Functional Attribute → Quality Value → Purchase Intention | 0.050 | 0.021 | 0.018 | 0.101 |
Functional Attribute → Emotional Value → Purchase Intention | 0.056 | 0.023 | 0.020 | 0.110 |
Functional Attributes → Price Value → Purchase Intention | 0.075 | 0.026 | 0.033 | 0.139 |
Functional Attribute → Social Value → Purchase Intention | 0.040 | 0.018 | 0.012 | 0.086 |
Symbolic Attribute → Quality Value → Purchase Intention | 0.030 | 0.015 | 0.008 | 0.070 |
Symbolic Attribute → Emotional Value → Purchase Intention | 0.030 | 0.015 | 0.007 | 0.069 |
Symbolic Attribute → Price Value → Purchase Intention | 0.032 | 0.017 | 0.006 | 0.075 |
Symbolic Attribute → Social Value → Purchase Intention | 0.050 | 0.019 | 0.021 | 0.098 |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 2.15 *** | 2.13 *** | (Intercept) | 2.30 *** | 2.29 *** |
Functional Attributes (FA) | 0.32 *** | 0.32 *** | Symbolic Attribute (SA) | 0.25 *** | 0.25 *** |
Environmental Awareness (EA) | 0.11 ** | 0.11 ** | Environmental Awareness (EA) | 0.14 *** | 0.14 *** |
FA × EA | 0.16 * | SA × EA | 0.25 *** | ||
F | 24.38 *** | 17.77 *** | F | 17.16 *** | 15.50 *** |
R2 | 0.10 | 0.11 | R2 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
ΔR2 | 0.01 * | ΔR2 | 0.01 *** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Y.; Tian, Y. The Impact of New Energy Vehicle Product Attributes on Consumer Purchase Intention in the Backdrop of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031989
Wang Y, Tian Y. The Impact of New Energy Vehicle Product Attributes on Consumer Purchase Intention in the Backdrop of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031989
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Yueying, and Ying Tian. 2023. "The Impact of New Energy Vehicle Product Attributes on Consumer Purchase Intention in the Backdrop of Sustainable Development Goals" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031989
APA StyleWang, Y., & Tian, Y. (2023). The Impact of New Energy Vehicle Product Attributes on Consumer Purchase Intention in the Backdrop of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 15(3), 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031989