Spatial Difference Studies and Driving Force Analysis of Rural Settlements in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Method
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.3. Methods
2.3.1. Research Methods of Spatial Distribution Characteristics
Average Nearest Neighbor
Voronoi Diagrams
Landscape Pattern Index
Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis
2.3.2. Geodetector
Optimal Parameter-Based Geodetector Model
Driving Factors’ Selection and Processing
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Spatial Distribution Pattern
3.1.1. Cluster Distribution Characteristics
3.1.2. Scale Distribution Characteristics
3.1.3. Morphological Distribution Characteristics
3.2. Driving Factors Analysis
3.2.1. Optimal Parameter Selection
3.2.2. Analysis of Driving Factors
4. Discussion
4.1. Characteristics of Rural Settlements Distributions
4.2. Relationship between the Rural Settlements and Influences
4.3. Policy Suggestions
4.4. Advantages and Limitations
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The rural settlements in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau exhibit the feature of “an extensive dispersion with localized concentrations”. The average nearest neighbor index was 0.16. The coefficient of variation CV was 1950.26%, and Moran’s I of the number of patches (NP) was 0.52, indicating a clear aggregating trai. However, due to geographic bounds the spatial distribution of settlements is extremely dispersed. Instead of forming an obvious distribution area of “core density area—a circular—core expansion group zone”, the spatial distribution is in the shape of dots, strips, and branches along the river valley.
- (2)
- The number and land use scale of rural settlements in the study area decreased from east to west. The rural settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River and Dadu River basin were the most concentrated, and the Xianshuihe River basin also had banded gathering areas, while the rural settlements in the west were sparse and dispersed. Although the morphology of most rural settlements is relatively simple, the spatial difference is also obvious. Most rural settlements build along rivers and roads, which makes the shape of rural settlements more complex. While the morphology of rural settlements is more regular in plateaus and valley areas.
- (3)
- Restricted by the development status of the productivity and industrial structure of the study area, arable land resources have the most significant impact on the spatial difference characteristics of rural settlements. The geohazards affect the safety of the settlement site and the spatial difference between rural settlements. The location and morphology of settlements are greatly affected by natural conditions such as altitude and accumulated temperature, while the scale of settlements is significantly compromised by the distance from highways and scenic spots. The mutually reinforcing role of driving factors is remarkable. In particular, the reinforcing effects of the arable land resources and factors with smaller population and q statistics are often stronger, which further proves the influence of arable land resources on the spatial differences in rural settlements in the study area.
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Beetz, S.; Huning, S.; Plieninger, T. Landscapes of Peripherization in North-Eastern Germany’s Countryside: New Challenges for Planning Theory and Practice. Int. Plan. Stud. 2008, 13, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willemen, L.; Hein, L.; van Mensvoort, M.E.F.; Verburg, P.H. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, G.; Gebhardt, H. Rural development and transformation in the Federal Republic of Germany since the 1950s. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2011, 66, 1644–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kılıc, D.; Yagci, C.; Iscan, F. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach using AHP for rural settlement site selection and eco-village design in Erzincan, Turkey. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2022, 86, 101478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coluzzi, R.; Bianchini, L.; Egidi, G.; Cudlin, P.; Imbrenda, V.; Salvati, L.; Lanfredi, M. Density matters? Settlement expansion and land degradation in Peri-urban and rural districts of Italy. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2022, 92, 106703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, B.; Li, H.B.; Hu, Z.Y.; Wen, Y.L.; Che, J.L. An Evaluation and Optimization of the Spatial Pattern of County Rural Settlements: A Case Study of Changshu City in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Land 2022, 11, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.M.; Geng, H.Z.; Yue, L.Y.; Li, K.S.; Huang, L. Spatial Differentiation Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of Rural Settlements Transformation in the Metropolis: A Case Study of Pudong District, Shanghai. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 755207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, M.Q.; Wei, L.Y.; Ge, D.Z.; Sun, D.Q.; Zhang, Z.F.; Lu, Y.Q. Spatial optimization of rural settlements based on the perspective of appropriateness–domination: A case of Xinyi City. Habitat Int. 2020, 98, 102148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.D.; Liu, J.P.; Xu, N.; Wang, W.; Yang, H. Quantitative study on the evolution trend and driving factors of typical rural spatial morphology in Southern Jiangsu Province, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.L.; Fang, X.Q.; Ye, Y. A Settlement Density Based Allocation Method for Historical Cropland Cover: A Case Study of Jilin Province, China. Land 2022, 11, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Du, G.M.; Zhang, H.N. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors in Northeast China from 2000 to 2020. Land 2022, 11, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.G.; Bai, Z.K.; Sun, Q.; Zhou, W. Rural settlement changes in compound land use areas: Characteristics and reasons of changes in a mixed mining-rural-settlement area in Shanxi Province, China. Habitat Int. 2017, 61, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Liu, M.L. Assessment of decoupling between rural settlement area and rural population in China. Land Use Policy 2014, 39, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; Liu, Y.S.; Long, H.L.; Qiao, L.Y. Spatio-temporal characteristics of rural settlements and land use in the Bohai Rim of China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2015, 25, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; Xu, Q.; Long, H.L. Spatial distribution characteristics and optimized reconstruction analysis of China’s rural settlements during the process of rapid urbanization. J. Rural Stud. 2016, 47, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Sun, H.B.; Chen, B.; Xia, X.H.; Li, P.F. China’s rural human settlements: Qualitative evaluation, quantitative analysis and policy implications. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 105, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Zhang, P.Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Deng, W.; Yang, Z.P.; Xue, J.F.; Du, H.R.; Li, X.M.; Liu, Y. The Research Progress on Typical Areas in China. Prog. Geogr. 2011, 30, 1538–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Q.M. The History and Current Trends of Research on Rural Settlement Geography In China. Acta Geogr. Sin. 1988, 43, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedate, A.; Herrero, L.C.; Sanz, J.Á. Economic valuation of the cultural heritage: Application to four case studies in Spain. J. Cult. Herit. 2004, 5, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.Q.; Zhang, X.L. Retrospect and Expectation of Rural Geography in China. Econ. Geogr. 2005, 25, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, M.J.; Xie, Y.W.; Cao, Q. Spatiotemporal changes in rural settlement land and rural population in the middle basin of the Heihe River, China. Sustainability 2016, 8, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wu, W.L.; Liu, K. Spatial evolution of rural settlement in mountainous areas under the major linear projects. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Y.; Luo, G.J.; Li, Y.B.; Tan, Q.; Zheng, C.; Yu, M.; Liao, J.J.; Li, M. Assessment of Sustainable Development of Rural Settlements in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of the Miaoling Mountains in Southwestern China. Land 2022, 11, 1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Mehmood, M.S.; Liu, S.C.; Gao, Y.M. Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Rural Settlements in Qinba Mountains, Shaanxi Province, China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, M.S.; Wang, C.J.; Tan, Y.X.; Yang, J.; Duan, L.S.; Fang, Y.N.; Li, W.H.; Shu, Y.; Liu, M.L. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of carbon storage in the Western Sichuan Plateau. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiang, M.S.; Yang, J.; Li, W.H.; Song, Y.T.; Wang, C.J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.L.; Tan, Y.X. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Simulation Prediction of Ecosystem Service Function in the Western Sichuan Plateau Based on Land Use Changes. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.Y.; Yue, W.Z.; Fang, B.; Feng, S.R. Scale response characteristics and geographic exploration mechanism of spatial differentiation of ecosystem service values in Dabie Mountain area, central China from 1970 to 2015. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2019, 74, 1904–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Li, H.H. Spatial pattern evolution of rural settlements from 1961 to 2030 in Tongzhou District, China. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 105044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ai, T.H.; Liu, Y.L. A Method of Point Cluster Simplification with Spatial Distribution Properties Preserved. Acta Geod. Cartogr. Sin. 2002, 32, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duyckaerts, C.; Godefroy, G. Voronoi tessellation to study the numerical density and the spatial distribution of neurones. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2000, 20, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, Y.B.; Yu, F.Z.; Li, X.H. Correlation Analysis for Fractal Dimension Between TM Image and Terrain of Broadleaved Forest in Tianmu Mountain. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2011, 31, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.F.; Xu, C.D. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2017, 72, 116–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marconcini, M.; Metz-Marconcini, A.; Üreyen, S.; Palacios-Lopez, D.; Hanke, W. Outlining where humans live, the World Settlement Footprint 2015. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, F.; Xiong, S.W.; Ou, J.G.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Lei, T. Human Settlement Resilience Zoning and Optimizing Strategies for River-Network Cities under Flood Risk Management Objectives: Taking Yueyang City as an Example. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, T.; Li, C.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Y. Fuzzy Assessment of Ecological Security on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau Based on Pressure–State–Response Framework. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Luo, Y.; Li, P.S.; Dong, W.; Yu, S.L.; Gao, X.H. Water-Facing Distribution and Suitability Space for Rural Mountain Settlements Based on Fractal Theory, South-Western China. Land 2021, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, L.N.; Shao, Q.Q.; Ning, J.; Huang, H.B. Ecological changes and the tradeoff and synergy of ecosystem services in western China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2022, 32, 1059–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, K.; Zhang, C.J.; He, L.; Li, Y.X.; Li, X.J. Evaluation of Ecological Environment Vulnerability in the Northwest Plateau Area of Sichuan. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2020, 27, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, D.; Gössling, S.; Hall, C.M. International tourism and climate change. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Clim. Chang. 2012, 3, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, G.J.; Yang, D.G. Distribution of Human Settlements in The Upstream Minjiang River and Their Ecological Characteristics——A Case Study of Lixian County. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2004, 13, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, W.L.; Zhou, W.C.; Li, A.N.; Zhang, B.L. GIS Based Spatial Analysis on Rural Settlement Centralization in The Upper Minjiang River Basin—A Case Study of Maoxian County. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2008, 17, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q.; Shi, Q.M.; Guo, Y.L.; Zhang, Y. The vertical differentiation of the mountain settlement niche in the upper reaches of Minjiang River. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2013, 68, 1559–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, M.; Guo, Y.L.; Li, F.C.; Wang, Q. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Mountainous Settlement Ecological Niche in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2017, 37, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.L.; Zha, X.C. Study on Temporal Variation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Rural Settlements in Mountainous Area in the South of Bashan Mountain–A Case Study of Chengkou County in Chongqing Municipality. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2023, 30, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, G.; Hu, Y.P.; Chen, Y. The safety of the settlement in mountain area with frequent geological disasters—Examples of villages and towns in the Hengduan Mountains. J. Xi’an Univ. Archit. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2014, 46, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, G.J.; Wang, Y.Q. A Preliminary Study on the Interactive Relationship Between Population and Environment in Mountains. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2002, 3, 282–287. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, R.M.; Zha, X.F.; Gu, P.Y. The Landform Formation Process of Alpine-Gorge in Beishan, Wushi County, Southwestern Tianshan. J. Geomech. 2017, 23, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.C. The formation and development of valley cities in western China. Econ. Geogr. 1999, 02, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.J. Changes in quantity, quality, and pattern of farmland in a rapidly developing region of China: A case study of the Ningbo region. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 15, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zang, L.Z.; Araral, E.; Wang, Y.H. Effects of land fragmentation on the governance of the commons: Theory and evidence from 284 villages and 17 provinces in China. Land Use Policy 2019, 82, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Ye, J.A.; Liao, Q.F. Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) for Land Use Classification Using Radar Images. Natl. Remote Sens. Bull. 2004, 8, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Category | Index | Formula |
---|---|---|
Settlement Scale | Patch Area | |
Patch Density | ||
Settlement Morphology and Structure | Average Patch Shape Index | |
Mean Patch Fractal Dimension |
Indicators | Driving Factors | Calculating Methods |
---|---|---|
Landform features | Elevation (X1) | The Zonal Statistics as Table tool in ArcGIS is used to obtain DEM data. |
Slope (X2) | ||
Hydrothermal conditions | Accumulated Temperature (X3) | The Zonal Statistics as Table tool in ArcGIS is used to get data sets. |
Rainfall (X4) | ||
Vegetation cover | NDVI (X5) | The Zonal Statistics as Table tool in ArcGIS is used to get data sets. |
Natural disasters | Distance To Hazard Point (X6) | Euclidean Distance can be calculated in ArcGIS. |
The living standards and amenities of local communities | Distance To Water System (X7) | Euclidean Distance can be calculated in ArcGIS. |
Distance To Roads (X8) | ||
Production resources | Distance To Cropland (X9) | Euclidean Distance can be calculated in ArcGIS. |
Distance To Scenic Spot (X10) | ||
Social economy development | GDP (X11) | The Zonal Statistics as Table tool in ArcGIS is used to get data sets. |
Population (X12) |
Indicators | Value | Zscore |
---|---|---|
ANN | 0.16 | −477.03 |
CV | 1950.26% | - |
Moran’s I | 0.52 | 119.44 |
Driving Factors | Patch Density (PD)-Location | Patch Area (PA)-Scale | Landscape Shape Index (MSI)-Morphology |
---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.2798 | 0.0986 | 0.2018 |
X2 | 0.0135 | 0.0045 | 0.0232 |
X3 | 0.2470 | 0.0766 | 0.2252 |
X4 | 0.0571 | 0.0092 | 0.0178 |
X5 | 0.0114 | 0.0029 | 0.0780 |
X6 | 0.2766 | 0.1574 | 0.3503 |
X7 | 0.0718 | 0.0614 | 0.1454 |
X8 | 0.1297 | 0.1196 | 0.2263 |
X9 | 0.3422 | 0.1781 | 0.4112 |
X10 | 0.1143 | 0.1164 | 0.1541 |
X11 | 0.0704 | 0.0159 | 0.0253 |
X12 | 0.1037 | 0.0331 | 0.0351 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tan, Y.; Xiang, M.; Lu, H.; Duan, L.; Yang, J.; Meng, J.; Li, A.; Deng, L. Spatial Difference Studies and Driving Force Analysis of Rural Settlements in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097074
Tan Y, Xiang M, Lu H, Duan L, Yang J, Meng J, Li A, Deng L. Spatial Difference Studies and Driving Force Analysis of Rural Settlements in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau. Sustainability. 2023; 15(9):7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097074
Chicago/Turabian StyleTan, Yuxiang, Mingshun Xiang, Haixia Lu, Linsen Duan, Jin Yang, Jiake Meng, Ao Li, and Lanlan Deng. 2023. "Spatial Difference Studies and Driving Force Analysis of Rural Settlements in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau" Sustainability 15, no. 9: 7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097074
APA StyleTan, Y., Xiang, M., Lu, H., Duan, L., Yang, J., Meng, J., Li, A., & Deng, L. (2023). Spatial Difference Studies and Driving Force Analysis of Rural Settlements in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau. Sustainability, 15(9), 7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097074