Research on the Impact of New Energy Vehicle Companies’ Marketing Strategies on Consumers’ Purchase Intention
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Related Works
3. Research Design
3.1. Questionnaire Design
- (1)
- Consumer
- (2)
- Cost
- (3)
- Communicate
- (4)
- Convenience
3.2. Questionnaire Basic Information
4. Results
4.1. Demographic Analysis
4.2. Questionnaire Analysis
4.2.1. Questionnaire Reliability Analysis
4.2.2. Questionnaire Results Analysis
4.2.3. Structural Equation Modeling
4.2.4. Factor Analysis
Factor 1: Basic Car Needs
Factor 2: New Energy Needs
Factor 3: Consumer Subjective Perception
Interaction between Factors
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Grondys, K. Implementation of the Sharing Economy in the B2B Sector. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eccles, R.G.; Ioannou, I.; Serafeim, G. The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Manag. Sci. 2014, 60, 2835–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ketprapakorn, N.; Kantabutra, S. Sustainable Social Enterprise Model: Relationships and Consequences. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, M.Y.-P.; Lin, K.-H.; Peng, D.L.; Chen, P. Linking Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: The Drivers of Sustainability in High-Tech Firms. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bharadwaj, A.S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Mis Q. 2000, 24, 169–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crick, J.M.; Crick, D. Coopetition and COVID-19: Collaborative business-to-business marketing strategies in a pandemic crisis. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 88, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pansari, A.; Kumar, V. Customer engagement: The construct, antecedents, and consequences. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2017, 45, 294–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parmar, B.L.; Freeman, R.E.; Harrison, J.S.; Wicks, A.C.; Purnell, L.; de Colle, S. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2010, 4, 403–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Li, M.; Gu, Y.; Yang, J. What Is Affecting the Popularity of New Energy Vehicles? A Systematic Review Based on the Public Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, J.-C.; Yang, C. Key Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase of Electric Vehicles. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abeydeera, L.H.U.W.; Mesthrige, J.W.; Samarasinghalage, T.I. Global Research on Carbon Emissions: A Scientometric Review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Wu, M.; Tian, X.; Zheng, G.; Du, Q.; Wu, T. China’s Provincial Vehicle Ownership Forecast and Analysis of the Causes Influencing the Trend. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denstadli, J.M.; Julsrud, T.E. Moving Towards Electrification of Workers’ Transportation: Identifying Key Motives for the Adoption of Electric Vans. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Bai, X. Incentive policies from 2006 to 2016 and new energy vehicle adoption in 2010-2020 in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 70, 24–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, K.; Hao, Y.; Fan, J.-L.; Wei, Y.-M. The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: The evidence from China. Energy Policy 2013, 61, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapustin, N.O.; Grushevenko, D.A. Long-term electric vehicles outlook and their potential impact on electric grid. Energy Policy 2020, 137, 111103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krupa, J.S.; Rizzo, D.M.; Eppstein, M.J.; Lanute, D.B.; Gaalema, D.E.; Lakkaraju, K.; Warrender, C.E. Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A-Policy Pract. 2014, 64, 14–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gould, J.; Golob, T.F. Clean air forever? A longitudinal analysis of opinions about air pollution and electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D-Transp. Environ. 1998, 3, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, H.; Liu, D.; Sovacool, B.K.; Wang, Y.; Ma, S.; Li, R.Y.M. Who buys New Energy Vehicles in China? Assessing social-psychological predictors of purchasing awareness, intention, and policy. Transp. Res. Part F-Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018, 58, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, S.-f.; Zhao, D.; Luo, R.-j. Evolutionary game analysis on local governments and manufacturers’ behavioral strategies: Impact of phasing out subsidies for new energy vehicles. Energy 2019, 189, 116064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhao, C.; Yin, J.; Zhang, B. Purchasing intentions of Chinese citizens on new energy vehicles: How should one respond to current preferential policy? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 1000–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.; Xu, M.; Li, R.; Yu, L. Research on Group Choice Behavior in Green Travel Based on Planned Behavior Theory and Complex Network. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potoglou, D.; Kanaroglou, P.S. Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D-Transp. Environ. 2007, 12, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helveston, J.P.; Liu, Y.; Feit, E.M.; Fuchs, E.; Klampfl, E.; Michalek, J.J. Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the US and China. Transp. Res. Part A-Policy Pract. 2015, 73, 96–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lane, B.; Potter, S. The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: Exploring the consumer attitude-action gap. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 1085–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carley, S.; Krause, R.M.; Lane, B.W.; Graham, J.D. Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transp. Res. Part D-Transp. Environ. 2013, 18, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahn, M.E. Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2007, 54, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axsen, J.; Kurani, K.S. Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric-What do car buyers want? Energy Policy 2013, 61, 532–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lauterborn, B. New marketing litany: Four Ps passé: C-words take over. Advert. Age 1990, 61. [Google Scholar]
Cronbach’s α Coefficient | Standardized Cronbach’s α Coefficient | Terms | Samples |
---|---|---|---|
0.982 | 0.985 | 17 | 5 |
Question | Mean after Deleting the Term | Variance after Deleting the Term | The Correlation between Deleted Items and the Population after Deleting the Items | Cronbach’s α after Deleting the Term |
---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 792.4 | 57,507.3 | 0.716 | 0.983 |
Q2 | 792.4 | 59,284.3 | 0.89 | 0.981 |
Q3 | 792.4 | 57,454.3 | 0.959 | 0.98 |
Q4 | 792.4 | 61,281.8 | 0.534 | 0.984 |
Q5 | 792.4 | 57,704.3 | 0.909 | 0.98 |
Q6 | 792.4 | 57,042.8 | 0.862 | 0.981 |
Q7 | 792.4 | 58,634.8 | 0.916 | 0.98 |
Q8 | 792.4 | 57,666.8 | 0.893 | 0.98 |
Q9 | 792.4 | 56,472.3 | 0.953 | 0.98 |
Q10 | 792.4 | 59,785.3 | 0.893 | 0.981 |
Q11 | 792.4 | 59,158.3 | 0.909 | 0.98 |
Q12 | 792.4 | 58,490.8 | 0.987 | 0.98 |
Q13 | 792.4 | 54,014.8 | 0.944 | 0.981 |
Q14 | 792.4 | 59,458.3 | 0.818 | 0.981 |
Q15 | 792.4 | 60,679.3 | 0.926 | 0.981 |
Q16 | 792.4 | 57,139.8 | 0.947 | 0.98 |
Q17 | 790.4 | 57,618.3 | 0.99 | 0.979 |
Factor | Question | Non-Standard Load Factors | Standardized Load Factors | z | S.E. | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Q1 | 1 | 0.925 | - | - | - |
Q4 | 0.647 | 0.855 | 3.047 | 0.212 | 0.002 ** | |
Q8 | 0.86 | 0.992 | 5.193 | 0.166 | 0.000 *** | |
Q10 | 0.63 | 0.997 | 5.319 | 0.118 | 0.000 *** | |
Q15 | 0.486 | 0.943 | 4.12 | 0.118 | 0.000 *** | |
Factor 2 | Q17 | 1 | 0.976 | - | - | - |
Q12 | 0.909 | 0.997 | 9.475 | 0.096 | 0.000 *** | |
Q3 | 1.038 | 0.963 | 6.279 | 0.165 | 0.000 *** | |
Q11 | 0.849 | 0.952 | 5.73 | 0.148 | 0.000 *** | |
Q2 | 0.777 | 0.873 | 3.706 | 0.21 | 0.000 *** | |
Factor 3 | Q5 | 1 | 0.993 | - | - | - |
Q6 | 1.116 | 0.972 | 8.245 | 0.135 | 0.000 *** | |
Q7 | 0.847 | 0.962 | 7.197 | 0.118 | 0.000 *** | |
Q9 | 1.044 | 0.933 | 5.491 | 0.19 | 0.000 *** | |
Q13 | 1.285 | 0.889 | 4.211 | 0.305 | 0.000 *** | |
Q14 | 0.811 | 0.942 | 5.913 | 0.137 | 0.000 *** | |
Q16 | 1.028 | 0.987 | 11.029 | 0.093 | 0.000 *** |
Factor (Latent Variable) | → | Analysis Term (Manifest Variable) | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | Standard Error | Z | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | → | Factor 2 | 0.665 | 0.859 | 0.226 | 2.94 | 0.003 ** |
Factor 1 | → | Factor 3 | −0.338 | −0.401 | 0.206 | −1.636 | 0.10 * |
Factor 2 | → | Factor 3 | 1.41 | 1.295 | 0.292 | 4.83 | 0.000 *** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wei, S.; Xu, H.; Zheng, S.; Chen, J. Research on the Impact of New Energy Vehicle Companies’ Marketing Strategies on Consumers’ Purchase Intention. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104119
Wei S, Xu H, Zheng S, Chen J. Research on the Impact of New Energy Vehicle Companies’ Marketing Strategies on Consumers’ Purchase Intention. Sustainability. 2024; 16(10):4119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104119
Chicago/Turabian StyleWei, Shuo, Hejun Xu, Sijing Zheng, and Junxi Chen. 2024. "Research on the Impact of New Energy Vehicle Companies’ Marketing Strategies on Consumers’ Purchase Intention" Sustainability 16, no. 10: 4119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104119
APA StyleWei, S., Xu, H., Zheng, S., & Chen, J. (2024). Research on the Impact of New Energy Vehicle Companies’ Marketing Strategies on Consumers’ Purchase Intention. Sustainability, 16(10), 4119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104119