How Does Digital Transformation Moderate Green Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Competitive Advantage in Sustainable Hotels?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework and Development of Hypothesis
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.1.1. The Relationship between Green Culture and Job Satisfaction
2.1.2. The Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Competitive Advantage
2.1.3. The Role of Digital Transformation and Job Satisfaction on Competitive Advantage
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Instrument
- (1)
- What are the features of your company’s green culture, and how does it reflect business processes?
- (2)
- How do you evaluate the factors that reflect job satisfaction in your company?
- (3)
- Can you describe your company’s digital transformation process and what is happening in the process?
- (4)
- How do you evaluate your company in terms of competitiveness, and in what areas does your company provide competitive advantage?
3.2. Research Area, Sampling, and Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
Evaluation of Survey Data with Structural Equation Modeling
4. Findings
4.1. Demographic Profile
4.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for the Structural Model
4.3. Hypothesis Tests
5. Text Mining Analysis of Interview Data
- Yellow cluster: This cluster, which includes the words “job”, “satisfaction”, and “working”, expresses the importance given by managers in hotel businesses to employee satisfaction and improvement of working conditions. For example, manager 8 stated that periodic surveys and improvements regarding job satisfaction and its sub-elements are carried out, and employees’ competencies are increased and their motivation is increased through continuous webinars and training. Manager 9 stated that job satisfaction in the organization is achieved through an inclusive work environment, training and development opportunities, health and well-being programs, reward systems, and open communication.
- Orange cluster: this cluster contains the words “motivation”, “employee”, and “increase”, which means that managers in hotel businesses use various strategies to motivate their employees, and this is aimed at increasing the workforce. In this context, manager 4’s statement that they managed to keep the motivation of the employees at a high level with effective leadership in their institution and that fair, open communication and a democratic working environment are among these motivation factors can be given as an example. The managers interviewed frequently touched on this issue.
- Red cluster: This cluster, which includes the words “culture”, “green”, and “nature”, refers to the importance given by hotel businesses to environmentally friendly practices and sustainability. For example, manager 7 emphasized that, within the scope of the green culture organization in their hotel, they occasionally provide training to employees on energy efficiency and savings management, and that they also take care to take part in social responsibility projects related to the environment.
- Blue cluster: This cluster, which includes the words “digital”, “process”, and “tools”, refers to the importance given by hotel business managers to digitalization and the integration of these processes into business operations. In fact, manager 10 stated that they expanded digital processes by reducing unnecessary paper printing waste, contributing to nature, and using more renewable resources, and that this provided very clear savings. They even think that they saved money directly for the company and indirectly for nature.
- Green cluster: This cluster, which includes the words “competitive”, “advantage”, and superior”, refers to the strategies of businesses to achieve competitive advantage and the effectiveness of these strategies. In this context, manager 10’s response “Our hotel creates a competitive advantage in terms of price and quality with its worldwide recognition, social network and correct strategies. When people trust a company, it shows that this company is of quality in that competitive area.” and manager 13’s statement “We gain competitive advantage in the environmental dimension and with the key to digital transformation. Prioritizing environmentally friendly products and customer coverage makes us stand out” can be given as examples.
6. Discussion
Limitations and Future Research
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tahir, R.; Athar, M.R.; Faisal, F.; Shahani, N.U.N.; Solangi, B. Green Organizational Culture: A Review of Literature and Future Research Agenda. ACDMHR 2019, 1, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, A.; Rasheed, F.; Waseem, M.; Tabash, M.I. Green Human Resource Management and Environmental Performance: The Role of Green Supply Chain Management Practices. Benchmarking Int. J. 2021, 29, 2881–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Jin, H.; Hua, Y.; Kong, C.; Lin, L. Green Research Based on Cultural Three-Hierarchy Theory. J. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 4, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, T.H.; Gallagher, V.C.; Lawong, D. The Greening of Organizational Culture: Revisited Fifteen Years Later. Am. J. Bus. 2016, 31, 206–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aggarwal, P.; Agarwala, T. Green Organizational Culture: An Exploration of Dimensions. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2021, 097215092110498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozak, A.M. Otel İşletmelerinde İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi ve Örnek Olaylar, 7th ed.; Detay Yayıncılık: Ankara, Turkey, 2019; ISBN 978-975-8326-07-5. [Google Scholar]
- Ravasi, D.; Schultz, M. Responding to Organizational Identity Threats: Exploring the Role of Organizational Culture. Acad. Manag. J. 2006, 49, 433–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akıncı Vural, Z.B. Kurum Kültürü ve Örgütsel İletişim; İletişim: Yayınları, İstanbul, 2005; ISBN 975-05-0124-1. [Google Scholar]
- Schein, E.H. Organizational Culture and Leadership; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-0-470-18586-5. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, C.L.; Lin, T.-C. The Role of Organizational Culture in the Knowledge Management Process. J. Knowl. Manag. 2015, 19, 433–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norton, T.A.; Zacher, H.; Ashkanasy, N.M. Pro-Environmental Organizational Culture and Climate. In The Psychology of Green Organizations; Robertson, J.L., Barling, J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015; ISBN 978-0-19-999748-0. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, C.H. Proactive and Reactive Corporate Social Responsibility: Antecedent and Consequence. Manag. Decis. 2015, 53, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, L.C.; Crane, A. The Greening of Organizational Culture: Management Views on the Depth, Degree and Diffusion of Change. J. Organ. Change Manag. 2002, 15, 214–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Locke, E. What Is Job Satisfaction? Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1969, 4, 309–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, T. The Emergence of Job Satisfaction in Organizational Behavior: A Historical Overview of the Dawn of Job Attitude Research. J. Manag. Hist. 2006, 12, 262–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dar, W.A.; Najar, I.A. Job Satisfaction of plus Two Male Lecturers of District Budgam with Respect to Their Marital Status. Int. J. Multidiscip. Educ. Res. 2017, 5, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
- Shahriari, M.; Tajmir Riahi, M.; Azizan, O.; Rasti-Barzoki, M. The Effect of Green Organizational Culture on Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2023, 33, 180–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poggi, A. Job Satisfaction, Working Conditions and Aspirations. J. Econ. Psychol. 2010, 31, 936–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakotić, D.; Babić, T. Relationship between Working Conditions and Job Satisfaction: The Case of Croatian Shipbuilding Company. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2013, 4, 206–213. [Google Scholar]
- Duserick, F.; Huang, W. Job Satisfaction as a Competitive Advantage: A Longitudinal Study. Compet. Forum 2013, 11, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
- Asiedu, E. Supportive Organisational Culture and Employee Job Satisfaction: A Critical Source of Competitive Advantage. A Case Study in a Selected Banking Company in Oxford City-UK. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Manag. 2015, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eiadat, Y.; Kelly, A.; Roche, F.; Eyadat, H. Green and Competitive? An Empirical Test of the Mediating Role of Environmental Innovation Strategy. J. World Bus. 2008, 43, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürlek, M.; Tuna, M. Reinforcing Competitive Advantage through Green Organizational Culture and Green Innovation. Serv. Ind. J. 2018, 38, 467–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, M.E.; van der Linde, C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995, 9, 97–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S. Green Organizational Identity: Sources and Consequence. Manag. Decis. 2011, 49, 384–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Broekhuizen, T.; Bart, Y.; Bhattacharya, A.; Qi Dong, J.; Fabian, N.; Haenlein, M. Digital Transformation: A Multidisciplinary Reflection and Research Agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hecklau, F.; Galeitzke, M.; Flachs, S.; Kohl, H. Holistic Approach for Human Resource Management in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 2016, 54, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehadeh, M.; Almohtaseb, A.; Aldehayyat, J.; Abu-AlSondos, I.A. Digital Transformation and Competitive Advantage in the Service Sector: A Moderated-Mediation Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, C. Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation? Sustainability 2022, 14, 7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lerman, L.V.; Benitez, G.B.; Müller, J.M.; de Sousa, P.R.; Frank, A.G. Smart Green Supply Chain Management: A Configurational Approach to Enhance Green Performance through Digital Transformation. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2022, 27, 147–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, H.; Wang, F.; Song, G.; Liu, L. Digital Transformation on Enterprise Green Innovation: Effect and Transmission Mechanism. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sui, B.; Yao, L. The Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate Financialization: The Mediating Effect of Green Technology Innovation. Innov. Green Dev. 2023, 2, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J. Manag. 1991, 17, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.H. How Organizational Green Culture Influences Green Performance and Competitive Advantage: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 30, 666–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, S.L. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 986–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, S.L.; Dowell, G. Invited Editorial: A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1464–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, P.M.; McMahan, G.C. Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management. J. Manag. 1992, 18, 295–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newbert, S. Value, Rareness, Competitive Advantage, and Performance: A Conceptual-Level Empirical Investigation of the Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 2008, 29, 745–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iaffaldano, M.; Muchinsky, P. Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. A Meta-Analysis. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 97, 251–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Judge, T.; Thoresen, C.; Bono, J.; Patton, G. The Job Satisfaction–Job Performance Relationship. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 127, 376–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, K.Z.; Li, J.J.; Zhou, N.; Su, C. Market Orientation, Job Satisfaction, Product Quality, and Firm Performance: Evidence from China. Strateg. Manag. J. 2008, 29, 985–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolli, T.; Pusterla, F. Decomposing the Effects of Digitalization on Workers’ Job Satisfaction. Int. Rev. Econ. 2022, 69, 263–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Defriza, R.; Lubis, A.R.; Madjid, I. Does Job Satisfaction Mediate the Effects of Competition, Organizational Culture, and Work Motivation on Staff Performance? East Afr. Sch. J. Econ. Bus. Manag. Vol 2019, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Gazi, M.A.I.; Islam, M.A.; Shaturaev, J.; Dhar, B.K. Effects of Job Satisfaction on Job Performance of Sugar Industrial Workers: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleischer, J.; Wanckel, C. Job Satisfaction and the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector: The Mediating Role of Job Autonomy. Rev. Public Pers. Adm. 2023, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, L.; Omrani, N. An Assessment of Trends in Technology Use, Innovative Work Practices and Employees’ Attitudes in Europe. Appl. Econ. 2015, 47, 623–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazurenko, O.; O’Connor, S.J. The Impact of Physician Job Satisfaction on the Sustained Competitive. J. Manag. Policy Pract. 2012, 13, 23–40. [Google Scholar]
- Lam, L.; Nguyen, P.; Le, N.; Tran, K. The Relation among Organizational Culture, Knowledge Management, and Innovation Capability: Its Implication for Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, J.; Khan, S.M. Green Knowledge Management and Organizational Green Culture: An Interaction for Organizational Green Innovation and Green Performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 2022, 27, 1852–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeşiltaş, M.; Gürlek, M.; Kenar, G. Organizational Green Culture and Green Employee Behavior: Differences between Green and Non-Green Hotels. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 343, 131051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, C.; Abbas, J.; Álvarez-Otero, S.; Khan, H.; Cai, C. Interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Green Culture and Their Role in Employees’ Responsible Behavior towards the Environment and Society. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 366, 132878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Köşker, Z.; Gürer, A. Sürdürülebilirlik Çerçevesinde Yeşil Örgüt Kültürü. JEBPIR 2020, 6, 88–109. [Google Scholar]
- Faisal, S. Green Human Resource Management—A Synthesis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subramanian, N.; Suresh, M. Green Organizational Culture in Manufacturing SMEs: An Analysis of Causal Relationships. Int. J. Manpow. 2023, 44, 789–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turan, A. Çevreci Davranış ve Örgüt Kültürü. İn İşletmelerde Sürdürülebilirlik Dinamikleri; Beta: İstanbul, Turkey, 2017; pp. 93–125. ISBN 9786254366499. [Google Scholar]
- Denison, D.; Mishra, A.K. Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 1995, 6, 204–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Machado, J.J.; Martínez-Ávila, M. Environmental Performance and Green Culture: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation. An Application to the Automotive Industry. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çelik, B.; Çavuşoğlu, S. Örgüt Kültürünün İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi. JOEEP 2022, 7, 120–140. [Google Scholar]
- Kiliç, F. Jenerik Stratejilerin Kurum Kültürü Üzerindeki Rolü: Farklılaşma Stratejisi, Kurum Kültürünü Besler mi, Zedeler mi? JOSMR 2021, 4, 103–122. [Google Scholar]
- Issa Gazi, M.A.; Islam, M.A.; Sobhani, F.A.; Dhar, B.K. Does Job Satisfaction Differ at Different Levels of Employees? Measurement of Job Satisfaction among the Levels of Sugar Industrial Employees. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- İşcan, Ö.; Timuroglu, M. Örgüt Kültürünün İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi ve Bir Uygulama/The Effect of Organizational Culture on Job Satisfaction. Atatürk Üniv. İktisadi İdari Bilim. Derg. 2007, 21, 119–135. [Google Scholar]
- Mesfin, D.; Woldie, M.; Adamu, A.; Bekele, F. Perceived Organizational Culture and Its Relationship with Job Satisfaction in Primary Hospitals of Jimma Zone and Jimma Town Administration, Correlational Study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020, 20, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sparrow, P.; Schuler, R.S.; Jackson, S.E. Convergence or Divergence: Human Resource Practices and Policies for Competitive Advantage Worldwide. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 1994, 5, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kretschmer, T.; Khashabi, P. Digital Transformation and Organization Design: An Integrated Approach. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2020, 62, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leão, P.; da Silva, M.M. Impacts of Digital Transformation on Firms’ Competitive Advantages: A Systematic Literature Review. Strateg. Change 2021, 30, 421–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, A.H.; Khahro, S.H.; Memon, N.A.; Memon, Z.A.; Mustafa, A. Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance in the Construction Industry of Pakistan. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Green, Green, It’s Green: A Triad Model of Technology, Culture, and Innovation for Corporate Sustainability. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Judge, T.; Locke, E.; Durham, C.; Kluger, A. Dispositional Effects on Job and Life Satisfaction: The Role of Core Evaluations. J. Appl. Psychol. 1998, 83, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Judge, T.A.; Klinger, R. Job Satisfaction: Subjective Well-Being at Work. In The Science of Subjective Well-Being; Eid, M., Larsen, R., Eds.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 393–413. [Google Scholar]
- Keser, A.; Bilir, K.B.Ö. İş Tatmini Ölçeğinin Türkçe Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik Çalişmasi. Kırklareli Üniv. Sos. Bilim. Derg. 2019, 3, 229–239. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.H.; Yang, C.Y.; Ren, J. Research on the Relationship between Novelty-Centered Business Model Innovation and Competitive Advantages of Sports Tourism—Based on the Empirical Analysis of Guizhou Province, China. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 2020, 13, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masoud, R.; Basahel, S. The Effects of Digital Transformation on Firm Performance: The Role of Customer Experience and IT Innovation. Digital 2023, 3, 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demir, C.; Çevirgen, A. Turizm ve Çevre Yönetimi, 1st ed.; 1.Baskı.; Nobel Yayınevi: Ankara, Turkey, 2006; ISBN 978-975-591-845-7. [Google Scholar]
- Păvăluc, C.; Anichiti, A.; Niţă, V.; Ionela, G. Analysing the Relationship between Tourism Development and Sustainability by Looking at the Impact on the Environment. A Study on the European Union Countries. CES Work. Pap. 2020, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Turizm Tesisleri. Available online: https://yigm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-9579/turizm-tesisleri.html (accessed on 19 February 2024).
- T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. Available online: https://ktb.gov.tr/genel/searchhotel.aspx?lang=tr&certificateType=4 (accessed on 19 February 2024).
- Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-273-71686-0. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, B.; Eva, N.; Zarea, F.; Newman, A.; Lee, A.; Obschonka, M. Addressing Common Method Variance and Endogeneity in Vocational Behavior Research: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. J. Vocat. Behav. 2020, 121, 103472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill Companies: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approachs, 3rd ed.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-1-4625-4903-0. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, B.; Babin, B.; Anderson, R. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürbüz, S.; Şahin, F. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz, 5th ed.; Seçkin Yayıncılık: Ankara, Turkey, 2018; ISBN 978-975-02-5127-6. [Google Scholar]
- Grave, E.; Bojanowski, P.; Gupta, P.; Joulin, A.; Mikolov, T. Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languages. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1802.06893. [Google Scholar]
- Čmelo, I.; Voršilák, M.; Svozil, D. Profiling and Analysis of Chemical Compounds Using Pointwise Mutual Information. J. Cheminform. 2021, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kharrazi, A.; Fath, B.D. Measuring Global Oil Trade Dependencies: An Application of the Point-Wise Mutual Information Method. Energy Policy 2016, 88, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozgeldi, M.; Orki, M.T. Şirket Satin Alma Sonrasinda Örgütsel Kültürün İş Tatminine Etkisi: Birey-Örgüt Uyumunun Ara Değişken Rolü. RJBM 2018, 5, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiziltan, Z.; Fidan, Y. Örgüt Kültürü, Yetenek Yönetimi ve İş Tatmini Arasindaki İlişki. UİİİD 2023, 49–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuşluvan, S.; Kuşluvan, Z. Turizm İşletmelerinde İşgören Devri: Anlami, Türleri ve Nedenleri. SOİD 2004, 28–37. [Google Scholar]
- Şengül, A. Turizm Işletmelerinde Işgören Devir Hızının Nedenleri ve Işaret Ettiği Ipuçları. Master’s Thesis, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Balıkesir, Turkey, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Edmans, A. The Link Between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, with Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2012, 26, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jibril, I.A.; Yeşiltaş, M. Employee Satisfaction, Talent Management Practices and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Northern Cyprus Hotel Industry. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belias, D.; Koustelios, A. Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction: A Review. Int. Rev. Manag. Mark. 2014, 4, 132–149. [Google Scholar]
- Mahmood, R.; Ahamed, M. Impact of Organizational Culture on Job Satisfaction: A Study on Banglalion Communication Ltd, Bangladesh. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2015, 7, 160–174. [Google Scholar]
- Asmui, M.U.; Mokhtar, N.; Musa, N.; Hussin, A. The Implementation of Organizational Green Culture in Higher Educational Institution. In Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2014); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 321–330. ISBN 978-981-10-1456-7. [Google Scholar]
- Azizan, O.; Riahi, M.T.; Shahriari, M.; Rasti-Barzoki, M. The Effect of Green Culture and Identity on Organizational Commitment. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2023, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalagat, R. Job Performance, Job Satisfaction and Motivation: A Critical Review of Their Relationship. Int. J. Manag. Econ. 2016, 5, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
- Schleicher, D.; Watt, J.; Greguras, G. Reexamining the Job Satisfaction-Performance Relationship: The Complexity of Attitudes. J. Appl. Psychol. 2004, 89, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ref. | Research | Participants | Research Method | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|
[21] | Researching supportive organizational culture and employee job satisfaction as a critical source of competitive advantage in a banking company | Conducted with 70 employees of a selected banking company in Oxford. | Survey Method | Frequency Analysis |
[42] | Decomposing the effects of digitalization on workers’ job satisfaction. | It was conducted with 3089 respondents, including part-time students and graduates of vocational education and training colleges. | Obtained from the online survey conducted as part of the ODEC Salary Survey | OLS Regression Analysis |
[43] | Does Job Satisfaction Mediate the Effects of Competition, Organizational Culture, and Work Motivation on Staff Performance | It was conducted with 113 employees of the Nation and Political Unity Agency in Indonesia. | Survey Method | Structural Equation Modeling |
[44] | The Impact of Job Satisfaction on The Job Performance of Workers In The Sugar Industry: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh | It was conducted with 300 respondents from five sugar factories in the sugar industry. | Survey Method | SPSS Regression Analysis |
[45] | Job satisfaction and the digital transformation of the public sector: The mediating role of job autonomy | 679 civil servants below the most senior employees (general managers). | Survey Method | Factor Analysis |
[46] | An assessment of trends in technology use, innovative work practices and employees’ attitudes in Europe | Data were obtained from EWCS. The sample was restricted to the Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Norway) and the U.K. In the 2005, the number of participant was 9640; in the 2010, it was 14,152. | Binary Data | Analysis of change in sample and within groups |
[47] | The impact of physician job satisfaction on the sustained competitive advantage of health care organizations | Literature Review | ||
[28] | Digital transformation and competitive advantage in the service sector: A moderated-mediation model | 371 employees working in service companies operating in Jordan. | Survey Method | Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test |
[48] | The Relation among Organizational Culture, Knowledge Management, and Innovation Capability: Its Implication for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity | 182 information technology firms operating in Vietnam. | Survey Study | Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Analysis |
[49] | Green Knowledge Management and Organizational GC: An Interaction for Organizational Green Innovation and Green Performance | 402 administrative and non-administrative employees of manufacturing and service firms. | Survey Study | Structural Equation Modeling |
Factors–Items | Std Loading | t-Value | R2 | C R | A V E | CA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC (GC) | ||||||
Involvement Culture (IC) | 0.929 | 0.815 | 0.928 | |||
GC-IC1 | 0.886 | 29.65 * | 0.78 | |||
GC-IC2 | 0.921 | 32.62 * | 0.84 | |||
GC-IC3 | 0.902 | 0.81 | ||||
Consistency Culture (CC) | 0.937 | 0.832 | 0.937 | |||
GC-CC1 | 0.944 | 35.28 * | 0.89 | |||
GC-CC2 | 0.894 | 30.52 * | 0.79 | |||
GC-CC3 | 0.899 | 0.80 | ||||
Adaptability Culture (AC) | 0.893 | 0.740 | 0.884 | |||
GC-AC1 | 0.930 | 18.24 * | 0.86 | |||
GC-AC2 | 0.952 | 18.56 * | 0.90 | |||
GC-AC3 | 0.670 | 0.45 | ||||
Mission Culture (MC) | 0.935 | 0.828 | 0.934 | |||
GC-MC1 | 0.927 | 33.21 * | 0.85 | |||
GC-MC2 | 0.906 | 31.27 * | 0.82 | |||
GC-MC3 | 0.898 | 0.80 | ||||
Job Satisfaction (JS) | 0.877 | 0.708 | 0.866 | |||
JS1 | 0.884 | 26.91 * | 0.78 | |||
JS2 | 0.684 | 17.84 * | 0.46 | |||
JS4 | 0.936 | 0.87 | ||||
Competitive Advantage (CA) | 0.918 | 0.652 | 0.919 | |||
CA1 | 0.773 | 0.59 | ||||
CA2 | 0.796 | 18.56 * | 0.63 | |||
CA3 | 0.814 | 19.04 * | 0.66 | |||
CA4 | 0.837 | 19.71 * | 0.70 | |||
CA5 | 0.802 | 17.16 * | 0.64 | |||
CA6 | 0.824 | 19.27 * | 0.67 | |||
Digital Transformation (DT) | 0.937 | 0.715 | 0.941 | |||
DT1 | 0.802 | 0.64 | ||||
DT2 | 0.890 | 22.96 * | 0.79 | |||
DT3 | 0.910 | 23.78 * | 0.82 | |||
DT4 | 0.900 | 23.56 * | 0.81 | |||
DT5 | 0.826 | 20.78 * | 0.68 | |||
DT6 | 0.733 | 17.76 * | 0.53 |
Factor | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. IC | 0.902 a | ||||||
2. CC | 0.875 | 0.912 a | |||||
3. AC | 0.769 | 0.850 | 0.860 a | ||||
4. MC | 0.769 | 0.850 | 0.481 | 0.909 a | |||
5. JS | 0.446 | 0.436 | 0.563 | 0.481 | 0.841 a | ||
6. CA | 0.501 | 0.531 | 0.483 | 0.563 | 0.615 | 0.807 a | |
7. DT | 0.556 | 0.602 | 0.680 | 0.680 | 0.561 | 0.660 | 0.845 a |
CA | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | Confidence Interval | ||||||
H3 | Min. | Max. | |||||
JS (X) | 0.15 * | 0.197 | 0.284 | ||||
DT (W) | 0.74 * | 0.533 | 0.953 | ||||
X.W (Interaction) | 0.05 ** | 0.004 | 0.103 | ||||
R2 | 0.60 | ||||||
DT | β | S.E. | t | LLCI | ULCI | ||
Low: | 0.20 * | 0.04 | 4.42 | 0.114 | 0.297 | ||
Middle: | 0.25 * | 0.03 | 7.37 | 0.184 | 0.317 | ||
High: | 0.29 * | 0.03 | 9.29 | 0.233 | 0.358 |
Collocation | Score | |
---|---|---|
1 | artificial intelligence | 8.502 |
2 | many years | 8.017 |
3 | environmentally friendly | 7.765 |
4 | social responsibility | 7.409 |
5 | competitive advantage | 7.365 |
6 | superior service | 7.239 |
7 | every department | 7.017 |
8 | energy efficiency | 6.824 |
9 | aim increase | 6.765 |
10 | digital transformation | 6.737 |
11 | natural resources | 6.737 |
12 | human resources | 6.737 |
13 | business processes | 6.695 |
14 | job satisfaction | 6.432 |
15 | organizational culture | 6.424 |
16 | green organizational | 6.332 |
17 | digital tools | 6.322 |
18 | corporate culture | 5.769 |
19 | service quality | 5.747 |
20 | energy resources | 5.322 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Degirmen, G.C.; Ozbey, D.O.; Sardagı, E.; Tekin, I.C.; Koc, D.; Erdogan, P.; Koc, F.; Arık, E. How Does Digital Transformation Moderate Green Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Competitive Advantage in Sustainable Hotels? Sustainability 2024, 16, 8072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188072
Degirmen GC, Ozbey DO, Sardagı E, Tekin IC, Koc D, Erdogan P, Koc F, Arık E. How Does Digital Transformation Moderate Green Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Competitive Advantage in Sustainable Hotels? Sustainability. 2024; 16(18):8072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188072
Chicago/Turabian StyleDegirmen, Gul Coskun, Derya Ozilhan Ozbey, Emine Sardagı, Ilknur Cevik Tekin, Durmus Koc, Pınar Erdogan, Feden Koc, and Emel Arık. 2024. "How Does Digital Transformation Moderate Green Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Competitive Advantage in Sustainable Hotels?" Sustainability 16, no. 18: 8072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188072
APA StyleDegirmen, G. C., Ozbey, D. O., Sardagı, E., Tekin, I. C., Koc, D., Erdogan, P., Koc, F., & Arık, E. (2024). How Does Digital Transformation Moderate Green Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Competitive Advantage in Sustainable Hotels? Sustainability, 16(18), 8072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188072