Next Article in Journal
An Assessment Methodology about the Effectiveness of Mobility IT Solutions: Application to Six Demo Sites
Next Article in Special Issue
Building Micro-Foundations for Digital Transformation: A Moderated Mediation Model of the Interplay between Digital Literacy and Digital Transformation
Previous Article in Journal
Comparing AlUla and The Red Sea Saudi Arabia’s Giga Projects on Tourism towards a Sustainable Change in Destination Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capability on the Relationship between E-Leadership Qualities and Innovation Management: Insights from Malaysia’s Medical Device Industry
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/su16052119
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Navigating Digital Transformation: Current Trends in Digital Competencies for Open Innovation in Organizations

by
Lorena Espina-Romero
1,*,
Doile Ríos Parra
2,
José Gregorio Noroño-Sánchez
3,
Gloria Rojas-Cangahuala
1,
Luz Emerita Cervera Cajo
4 and
Pedro Alfonso Velásquez-Tapullima
5
1
Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru
2
Centro de Investigaciones Sociales y Económicas, Universidad Popular del Cesar, Valledupar 200002, Colombia
3
Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130001, Colombia
4
Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad César Vallejo, Lima 15314, Peru
5
Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima 15314, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(5), 2119; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052119
Submission received: 26 January 2024 / Revised: 16 February 2024 / Accepted: 1 March 2024 / Published: 4 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Current Practices and Future Directions of Sustainable Digital Transformation)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study explored both the evolution and the integration of digital competencies within the context of open innovation, emphasizing the impact of technological advances across various sectors. The goal was to analyze documents indexed in Scopus from 2017 to 2023 using a quantitative and bibliometric approach. The methodology employed RStudio version 4.3.2 and Microsoft Excel 365 for data analysis, focusing on variables such as documents per year, h-index, total citations, and academic sources. The findings indicated a significant increase in research, highlighting a diversity of approaches, a trend towards international collaboration, and an evolution from basic concepts to complex applications, particularly the integration of digitization with sustainability and innovation. This research underscores the transformation of the business sector through digital competencies in open innovation and suggests further exploration into the effects of the pandemic on digital competencies, the role of artificial intelligence, the digital competencies–sustainable development relationship, and their application across different sectors.

1. Introduction

Research on digital competencies today, especially in the context of open innovation, covers a wide and varied field [1,2,3,4]. This bibliometric study seeks to deeply explore this field, identifying trends, changes, and gaps in existing knowledge [5,6,7,8,9]. Digital competencies, defined as the skills and knowledge required to effectively navigate the digital environment, are critical in today’s era of digital transformation, where technology and open innovation are cornerstones of almost every sector [10,11].
The bibliometric review method is suitable for addressing the research questions posed because of its ability to quantify the impact and trends of research in a specific field [12,13]. This method allows for a thorough analysis of the literature to identify trends, shifts in research focus, and underexplored areas [14,15,16,17]. Despite the growing literature on digital competencies in open innovation, there is a gap in how these competencies have evolved and how they are integrated in different contexts and sectors [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. This gap warrants a detailed and at the same time updated study to serve as a basis for future research. Accordingly, this research poses five specific research questions (RQ1 to RQ5).
RQ1.
What were the trends and changes in digital competencies research from 2017 to 2023 and how do these relate to open innovation in various areas?
RQ2.
What are the trends and impact in the scientific literature on digital competencies in the context of open innovation, according to the number of publications, h-index, and total citations in relevant academic sources?
RQ3.
What are the key trends and impacts of digital competencies on organizations, considering the world’s most cited documents on open innovation?
RQ4.
What are the status and trends in the production of knowledge on digital competencies in the context of open innovation worldwide, considering geographical distribution and academic impact?
RQ5.
What are the future research directions to better understand digital competencies in the context of open innovation?
The main objective was to analyze the documents indexed in Scopus from 2017 to 2023 on the variables that were the subject of this study. This study will contribute a comprehensive analysis of the state of research on digital competencies within the framework of open innovation, highlighting key trends, impacts, and future directions. It will provide a solid foundation for researchers, guiding future research in the field.
This document will be structured as follows: after the introduction, a review of the literature will be conducted. This will be followed by the methodology, which provides a description of the methodological steps. Then, the results will be presented along with their respective analyses, addressing the research questions and interpreting the results. Finally, the conclusions will be presented, which include a synthesis of the findings as well as recommendations for future research and the implications and limitations of the study.

2. Trends in Digital Competencies and Open Innovation: A Review of the Literature

The literature review to support this study builds on several previous studies. An analysis of these studies is provided below, highlighting the main theories, approaches, and methodologies used, as well as the definitions of the variables under study according to the authors.
  • Martínez-Bravo et al. [25] focus on digital competency, defining it as the safe and critical use of ICT for employment, learning, personal development, and participation in society. They also highlight the role of online communities based on the exchange of experiences, information, and knowledge. The study focuses on the virtual community ScolarTIC and reveals that its decentralized knowledge-sharing structure can aid in the development of digital competencies, with an emphasis on security and information.
  • The study by Magni et al. [26] focuses on how digital competencies modify co-creation in higher education. It uses case study analysis, focusing on Little Genius International, an international school in English for digital natives. It emphasizes the importance of digital competencies in understanding student co-creation in higher education.
  • Ibadango-Galeano et al. [27] focus on the competencies acquired by Educational Technology and Innovation teachers in the creation of digital stories within a telecollaboration project. Digital, narrative, creative, and didactic competencies are evaluated, indicating that the experience of creating digital stories is highly successful in teaching practice.
  • Prendes-Espinosa et al. [28] address business and digital competencies as cross-cutting competencies in higher education. A model called EmDigital is developed, encompassing four areas, 15 sub-competencies, and 45 indicators related to digital business competency. This model has implications for assessment and training in higher education.
  • As for Bartoli et al. [29], their study analyzes the impact of digitalization on product marketing with geographical indications (GIs) in agriculture. It highlights the need to enhance digital competencies for the integration of technologies in all business areas and for innovation in the GI market.
  • Nuccio and Mogno [30] in their chapter review the literature on knowledge, skills, and competencies (KSCs) in the knowledge-based economy. The importance of KSCs in various fields is emphasized as well as the need for both creative and digital competencies in the workforce.
  • Arnold et al. [31] focus on virtual collaborative learning–teaching and how immersive technologies develop competencies such as collaboration, virtual communication, and problem solving. The study is based on a formative assessment of skills in the Hotel Academy project and highlights the potential of virtual reality in higher education.
  • Pintarić and Tomasović [32] focus on digital competencies related to open science and propose a framework that includes both generic and professional digital competencies. The need to enhance the digital competencies of future actors in open science is emphasized.
In general, these studies emphasize the importance of digital competencies in contexts such as higher education, teaching, marketing, and open science. However, there are gaps, such as further explorations into digital competencies in open innovation and a lack of focus on specific contexts or regions. These gaps can be addressed in the present study, which will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the literature in this field and identify emerging trends and research areas. Below is a comparative table (Table 1) that highlights why the present study is significant compared to the academic works cited in this section.
This study stands out for its specific focus on digital competencies in the context of open innovation as well as for its temporal approach, explicit relationship with open innovation, and ability to identify trends and future directions. This makes it a valuable contribution to the understanding of a significant research area today.

3. Materials and Methods

In this quantitative study with a bibliometric approach [12], five specific objectives were established to assess the evolution of trends in digital competencies research from 2017 to 2023 and identify key thematic changes and their impact on open innovation. The objectives were as follows:
O1.
Evaluate the evolution of trends in digital competencies research from 2017 to 2023, identifying key thematic changes and their impact on open innovation.
O2.
Evaluate the most relevant academic sources and their impact on the field of digital competencies in the context of open innovation.
O3.
Synthesize key trends and impacts of digital competencies on organizations, based on an analysis of the most globally cited documents related to open innovation.
O4.
Assess the production and impact of research on digital competencies in the context of open innovation worldwide, identifying the main contributing countries in terms of the number of documents and citations as well as the distribution of research by continent and the global gap in knowledge production.
O5.
Explore emerging areas in digital competencies related to open innovation to guide future research and enhance practical application across various sectors.

3.1. Population and Sample

The population for this study consisted of a total of 18,658 publications related to digital competencies and open innovation from the period 2005 to 2023. The selected sample comprised 287 documents limited to the period 2017–2023. “Articles in Press” (Aip) were excluded to ensure data quality in the analysis (Figure 1).

3.2. Data Sources

A search was conducted in the Scopus database [33], using a combination of terms related to digital competencies and open innovation. The terms were as follows: “Digital competences” OR “Digital skills” OR “Digital literacy” OR “Digital competencies” OR “Digital capabilities” OR “Tech skills” OR “Technology literacy” OR “Computer literacy” OR “Information technology skills” OR “E-literacy” OR “Internet skills” AND “Open Innovation” OR “Collaborative Innovation” OR “External Innovation” OR “Crowdsourced Innovation” OR “Participative Innovation” OR “Networked Innovation” OR “Cooperative Innovation” OR “Distributed Innovation” OR “Collective Innovation” OR “Shared Innovation”.

3.3. Variables Analyzed

Various variables of interest were collected and recorded from Scopus. The analyzed variables included the following:
  • Documents per year of publication: Refers to the total number of documents published each year. This variable allows for the analysis of scientific productivity over time [34].
  • h-index: Proposed by Hirsch in 2005, this variable measures the productivity and citational impact of an author’s or journal’s publications. An author has an h-index if h out of their Np articles has at least h citations each [35].
  • Total citations: This is the total sum of times a work by an author, article, or source has been cited. It reflects the impact or influence of the published research [36].
  • Sources (journals or conferences): Refers to the scientific journals or conferences in which the analyzed documents have been published. This variable helps identify knowledge dissemination platforms in a specific field [36].
  • Annual growth rate (%): Measures the percentage of annual growth or decline in scientific production in a specific field. It offers insight into the evolution of the study area [12].
  • Average age of documents: Calculates the average age of the analyzed documents, thus providing insight into the temporal relevance of research in a specific field [37].
  • Average citations per document: This indicator shows the average number of citations received by each document, providing a measure of the average impact of works in a specific field [38].
  • Cited references: Identifies whether bibliographic references are cited in the analyzed documents. This dataset allows for the study of the theoretical and methodological foundations upon which current research is built [39].
  • Author keywords: These are keywords provided by the authors of the documents. These are useful for identifying the main research topics and thematic trends within a field of study [40].
  • Most influential authors, journals, documents, and countries: Identifies authors, journals, documents, and countries with the greatest impact in a field of study, based on measures such as the number of citations and visibility [41].
  • Percentage of international co-authorship: Measures the percentage of documents resulting from international collaborations. This indicator shows global scientific cooperation [42].
These variables were crucial for assessing the quantitative and qualitative aspects of publications in the field of digital competencies and open innovation.

3.4. Methods of Analysis

For the analysis of the data collected in this study, a combination of tools and analytical techniques was employed to address the objectives of this research. Below are the methodologies applied using RStudio and Microsoft Excel 365.

3.4.1. Use of RStudio

RStudio, an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for the R programming language, was utilized as a tool for statistical analysis and data generation to populate the tables. The selection of RStudio was due to its ability to handle large datasets and its flexibility for complex statistical analyses [13]. Figure 2 depicts the state of Bibliographic Metadata Integrity according to the report from this software.
In this study, the following methods were applied using RStudio:
  • Network approach for thematic analysis (Objective 1): A network analysis model was implemented to identify thematic trends over time. This approach involved the creation of nodes for key themes and the evaluation of their interconnectedness based on co-occurrence in the literature. The igraph package in R was used to build and analyze the network, allowing for the identification of thematic clusters and their evolution.
  • Generation of thematic maps and bar charts (Objective 1): Using RStudio’s graphics functionality, thematic maps were created to represent the distribution of themes over the years. Furthermore, for an interpretation of trends over time, bar charts were employed to visualize the number of publications per year.

3.4.2. Use of Microsoft Excel 365

For data organization, analysis, and visualization, Microsoft Excel 365 was employed. Excel was selected for its intuitive interface and data handling capabilities for complementary analyses, such as the below:
  • Analysis of academic sources (Objective 2) and most cited documents (Objective 3): Filters and sorting functions in Excel were applied to classify and analyze academic sources and documents according to their relevance and number of citations. This process enabled the identification of the most significant contributions to the field of study.
  • Assessment of the global distribution of publications (Objective 4): Excel was used to map the geographical distribution of publications and their impact on citations, thus facilitating the visualization of global and regional patterns in research.
  • Identification of emerging trends and creation of a future research agenda (Objective 5): Through the analysis of data generated and visualized in Excel, emerging trends were identified to propose a future research agenda. This analysis was supported by the synthesis of the findings from this study.

3.4.3. Integration of Tools and Techniques

The integration of RStudio and Microsoft Excel allowed for a diverse approach to data analysis. While RStudio facilitated complex analyses, Excel was used for more direct analysis and visualization tasks. This combination ensured both the depth and accessibility of analysis, enabling an exploration of data from multiple angles.

3.5. Limitations

This study faced inherent limitations due to its methodological approach and scope. For instance, selecting a single database, Scopus, and the exclusive use of RStudio may have limited the breadth of the reviewed literature, omitting relevant studies on other platforms. Additionally, by excluding press articles, emerging research may have been overlooked. On the other hand, technological evolution and changes in the dynamics of open innovation can make findings less representative over time. The generalization of the results is also limited by the geographical concentration of the analyzed studies, which may not reflect variations in digital competencies and open innovation in different contexts. External factors, such as governmental policies and global crises, not deeply examined, also play a role in how these competencies and innovations are developed and implemented.

3.6. Ethics and Legal Considerations

We utilized a variety of software, search engines, and translators incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to enhance various aspects of our research: Microsoft Word for grammar and style suggestions, Microsoft Excel for data analysis and visualization suggestions, DeepL for accurate translations, ChatGPT for comparing translations, and Google Search for optimizing information retrieval. However, it is important to note that these resources did not replace data interpretation or scientific conclusions extraction. Ethical and legal principles were respected in the collection and analysis of bibliometric data.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Main Information on the Selected Data

The main information was obtained from the overview generated by RStudio. Figure 3 shows an annual growth of 59.56% from 2017 to 2023, indicating an expansion and interest in the field of digital competencies related to open innovation. With 210 sources and 287 documents, this field exhibits a diverse knowledge base, suggesting interdisciplinary interest and a broad application of digital competencies.
The average age of the documents was 1.33 years, which was relatively low. This suggests that most of the research in this field is recent. An average of 8.672 citations per document was a significant indicator of the relevance and impact of research in this field. With 952 author keywords (DE) and 909 authors, including 31 authors of single-authored documents, a variety of research approaches and interests within the variables under study were demonstrated. The 25.44% international co-authorship highlighted global collaboration in this field, although there is room for increased international collaboration.
Most of the documents were articles (196), followed by conference papers (47), book chapters (27), review documents (14), and books (3). This indicates a preference for publication in journals and conferences, which is common in fields oriented towards applied research.
In summary, this analysis shows that digital competencies in the context of open innovation are growing, with a strong focus on the recent literature and diversity of approaches and contributions, with a trend towards international collaboration, although there is still room for growth in this latter aspect.

4.2. Analysis of Progression in Digital Competencies Research: Key Trends and Thematic Changes from 2017 to 2023 in the Context of Open Innovation

To comply with Objective 1, this section evaluates the evolution of trends in digital competencies research from 2017 to 2023 to identify thematic changes and their impact on open innovation. This section examines the main themes and the quantity of documents produced in the selected period, allowing us to identify how research interests and focus areas in the field of digital competencies have evolved. The themes for each year were obtained using RStudio software version 4.3.2 through the analysis of the Conceptual Structure and its network-focused approach known as the Thematic Map. This approach enabled the identification of trends and relationships among key concepts over the years. Figure 4 shows a significant increase in the number of studies, rising from 6 documents in 2017 to 99 in 2023, indicating an interest in research on the variables under study.
In the years 2017–2018, the themes were centered on aspects such as ‘ecosystems’, ‘accessibility’, ‘design’’, and ‘digital literacies’, suggesting an exploration phase to establish foundations in the field [25,43,44]. In 2019–2020, there was a shift towards more technical topics such as ‘digital technologies’, ‘architectural modeling’, ‘digital economy’, and ‘Building Information Modeling (BIM)’. This reveals a transition towards the application of digital competencies in more specialized areas [45,46,47,48,49].
In 2021, with themes like ‘e-learning’, ‘digital literacies’, and ‘education’, the focus seemed to return to fundamentals, possibly influenced by the pandemic and the need for digital competencies in education [4,28,50]. In 2022, themes such as ‘digital transformation’, ‘COVID-19’, and ‘artificial intelligence’ indicated a response to global challenges, with a focus on advanced technologies [1,51,52]. In 2023, themes like ‘digitization’, ‘innovation’, and ‘sustainable development’ suggested an expansion of the field, integrating digitization with global objectives such as sustainability [53,54,55].
Over the years, research themes have evolved from basic concepts to more complex applications and, finally, to an integration of digitization with topics like sustainability and innovation. The emergence of themes like ‘COVID-19’, ‘artificial intelligence’, and ‘sustainable development’ demonstrates how digital competencies are responding to global trends. Martínez-Bravo et al.’s and Ibadango-Galeano et al.’s studies align with the initial phases and the return to educational fundamentals, highlighting the importance of online communities and the creation of digital stories in teaching [25,27]. In turn, Magni et al. and Prendes-Espinosa et al. consider the transition towards technical applications and the focus on digital competencies in higher education and digital business [26,28]. Additionally, Bartoli et al., Nuccio and Mogno, Arnold et al., and Pintarić and Tomasović align with the integration–expansion phase in 2023, focusing on digitalization for sustainability, innovation, and the importance of digital competencies in fields such as agriculture, the economy, and higher education, among others [29,30,31,32].
In summary, research on digital competencies has evolved to not only address technical and educational aspects but also to respond to global challenges and contribute to open innovation in sectors such as technology, education, and sustainable development.

4.3. Analysis of the Most Relevant Sources

This section evaluates the 10 most relevant academic sources and their impact on the field of digital competencies in the context of open innovation to meet Objective 2. These sources were identified using RStudio. The number of documents, h-index, and total citations (TC) in Table 2 are analyzed.
This study reveals some trends based on the provided data. Each source is analyzed below:
  • Sustainability (Switzerland): This journal led in the number of articles (26) and had a respectable h-index (7), with a total of 146 citations. This suggests that it is a primary source in the field of digital competencies and open innovation, with a significant impact on the academic community [56,57,58].
  • Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity: Despite having only 7 articles, its h-index (4) and total citations (293) were impressive. This indicates that although the number of publications is lower, the influence and quality of the work are very high, reflecting a considerable impact on open innovation research [4,53,54,55,59].
  • Communications in Computer and Information Science: With 6 articles but a low h-index (1) and only 2 citations, it seems that this source is less influential in the field, with a lesser impact on the research community [60,61].
  • Journal of Business Research: This journal had 5 articles with an h-index of 3 and 83 citations. This indicates a notable contribution to the study of digital competencies, being a relevant source of information and analysis in this field [62,63,64,65].
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Similarly, with 5 articles but a lower h-index (2) and 48 citations, this suggests that this source plays an important role, although perhaps not as central as others in digital competencies research [20,66,67,68].
  • ACM International Conference Proceeding Series and Frontiers in Psychology: Both with 4 articles but a low h-index (1) and very few citations (1 and 6, respectively), this could indicate that they are emerging or niche sources in the field of open innovation and digital competencies [69,70,71,72].
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries): With 4 articles, an h-index of 1, and 11 citations, this shows a modest contribution to the field [73,74].
  • Cogent Business and Management and Heliyon: With 3 articles each, an h-index of 2, and total citations of 6 and 7, respectively, these are sources that contribute to the field but with limited impact compared to the main sources [75,76,77,78,79,80].
In summary, this analysis highlights the dominance of journals like “Sustainability” and “Journal of Open Innovation” in digital competencies research within the framework of open innovation. Although there are other sources with significant contributions, these two appear to be the most influential in terms of the number of publications and citations, demonstrating their relevance and authority in the field.

4.4. Analysis of the Most Cited Documents in Digital Competencies and Open Innovation

In this section, the trends and impacts of digital competencies in organizations were summarized according to the analysis of the most cited documents in the framework of open innovation, a crucial issue in the era of digital transformation, to comply with Objective 3. The information included in Table 3 was generated with RStudio.
Analyzing the data from Table 3, several key trends in the most cited global documents stand out.
  • A focus on digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: The study by Priyono et al. [59] was the most cited, highlighting digital transformation in SMEs during the pandemic and emphasizing digital adaptation in times of crisis.
  • Digital competencies and organizational performance: Khin and Ho [81] and Heredia et al. [82] address the relationship between digital technology, digital competencies, and organizational performance. This indicates an interest in how digitalization directly impacts business success.
  • Challenges and opportunities of Industry 4.0: Queiroz et al.’s work on Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities highlights the challenges of digitalization in the industrial sector [83].
  • Gap in digital marketing competencies: Herhausen et al. [84] identify a gap in digital marketing competencies, signaling a critical development area for companies in the digital era.
  • The role of personnel in digital transformation: Cetindamar et al. [85] and El Hilali et al. [45] focus on the role of employees in digital transformation, addressing the topics of digital literacy and sustainability.
  • A microfoundational perspective in the era of digital transformation: Scuotto et al. [62] and Kamberidou [47] explore how SMEs and women entrepreneurs adapt to the digital economy, showing an interest in how individuals and small organizations handle digital transformation.
  • Adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing: Kinkel et al.’s study on the adoption of artificial intelligence in manufacturing reveals an interest in the application of advanced technologies in traditional sectors [86].
Table 3. Most cited documents.
Table 3. Most cited documents.
AuthorTitleTotal Citations
Priyono et al. (2020) [59] “Identifying Digital Transformation Paths in the Business Model of SMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic”238
Khin and Ho (2019) [81] “Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation”234
Queiroz et al. (2019) [83] “Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities: A framework for understanding digitalization challenges and opportunities”143
Herhausen et al. (2020) [84] “The digital marketing capabilities gap”96
Heredia et al. (2022) [82] “How do digital capabilities affect firm performance? The mediating role of technological capabilities in the new normal”70
Cetindamar et al. (2021) [85]“Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance”70
El Hilali (2020) [45] “Reaching sustainability during a digital transformation: a PLS approach”70
Scuotto et al. (2021) [62] “A microfoundational perspective on SMEs’ growth in the digital transformation era”55
Kamberidou (2020) [47]“Distinguished women entrepreneurs in the digital economy and the multitasking whirlpool”55
Kinkel et al. (2022) [86]“Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing—Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies”46
These trends demonstrate an interest in how digital competencies and open innovation are reshaping the business sector, emphasizing digital adaptation, the importance of human capital in digital transformation, and the integration of AI in traditional sectors.

4.5. Analysis of Trends, Impacts, and Geographic Distribution

In this section, the research in the field of study was globally assessed, highlighting the leading countries in production and impact, continental distribution, and global disparities in knowledge generation. To fulfill Objective 4, this research revealed several trends based on the data provided by RStudio, which are visualized in Figure 5. Here is an analysis of these trends:

4.5.1. Key Trends of the Ten Countries with the Highest Number of Documents and Their Total Citations

Indonesia led in the number of papers (29), with a high total of citations (309), suggesting a significant impact on research on the variables under study [87,88,89,90]. Spain followed closely behind with 28 documents, although its total citations were relatively low (80), indicating less influence in the field compared to Indonesia [54,91,92]. China, with 26 papers and 97 total citations, shows a steady engagement in research, albeit with a moderate impact in terms of citations [93,94,95].
Italy and Germany had a similar number of papers (21 and 16, respectively), but Germany had a higher citation total (125 versus Italy’s 121), suggesting a profound influence on the academic community [29,96,97,98]. Mexico and the Russian Federation demonstrate commitment in the field (16 and 15 documents, respectively), but with varying impact, as Mexico had 22 citations and Russia had none [70,99,100,101]. Portugal, the United States, and France round out the list, with France standing out due to a high number of citations (167), despite having fewer documents (10), indicating highly influential research [69,102,103,104,105].

4.5.2. Number of Countries with Documents by Continent

Asia and Europe led in terms of continental participation, with 24 and 34 countries respectively involved in research, representing 46.67% and 65.22% of their countries. America and Africa had moderate participation, with 8 and 7 countries, respectively (17.14% and 12.96% of their countries). Oceania showed the lowest participation with only 2 countries involved, representing 20% of the countries on the continent.

4.5.3. Total Global Countries with and without Documents

There were 75 countries (38.46%) that have contributed documents in this area, indicating a global scope of research. However, there are still a large number of countries (120, or 61.54%) that have not contributed to this area, indicating possible knowledge gaps or a lack of resources for research in these countries [106]. In short, this analysis reveals global participation in research on digital competencies within the context of open innovation, with variations in impact and influence among countries. This information can be crucial for understanding how different regions contribute to and benefit from open innovation in the digital field.

4.6. Future Research Agenda: Digital Competencies in the Context of Open Innovation

To fulfill Objective 5, this document presents a future research agenda focused on exploring emerging areas related to digital competencies within the framework of open innovation. This agenda is based on trends from previous analyses in this study, proposing research questions that address everything from the impact of the pandemic on digital transformation to the evolution of digital competencies in the context of emerging technologies and collaborations between countries (see Table 4).
This agenda provides a comprehensive perspective on the issues that shape the field of digital competencies in the context of open innovation. It is hoped that addressing these questions will not only advance the understanding of these issues but also positively influence the actions of global organizations and governments. Adapting to technological changes and the demand for digital competencies represents a challenge but also an opportunity to foster inclusive and sustainable development in the digital age.

4.7. Synthesis of Research Results (2017–2023)

Below is a summary table of the main results aligned to each of the research questions (RQ1 to RQ5) of the document (Table 5).
This table summarizes how digital competencies are evolving and the importance of digital research to meet future challenges.

5. Conclusions

This research has shown significant growth in the field of digital competencies for open innovation, demonstrating an evolution in the adoption of new technologies and methodologies. The bibliometric analysis applied in this study highlights an expansion of study topics, ranging from the integration of artificial intelligence to the importance of sustainability in open innovation.
The results show an annual increase of 59.56% in scientific production on the variables under study, underscoring the importance of digital competencies in the innovation domain. Emerging themes identified include digital transformation, artificial intelligence, and their impact on sustainability, indicating a shift towards more integrative and sustainable approaches in open innovation. Additionally, influential sources were identified, with journals such as “Sustainability (Switzerland)” and “Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity” being highlighted. The analysis of global research output and impact emphasized the contributions of countries such as Indonesia and Spain while also noting knowledge gaps elsewhere.
The findings suggest that policymakers should consider strategies to foster the development of digital competencies, promote open innovation, and facilitate the integration of new technologies to maintain competitiveness and sustainability in a globally digitized market.
Exploring the impact of the pandemic on digital competencies, the role of artificial intelligence in open innovation, and the relationship between digital competencies and sustainable development is recommended. These areas are relevant for future research that can contribute to an understanding of the evolution of open innovation in the digital era. Additionally, further exploration of knowledge and resource gaps between countries is suggested to promote more inclusive and collaborative research in the field of digital competencies and open innovation.
The findings are essential for researchers, professionals, and policymakers interested in the development of digital competencies and the promotion of open innovation. The results highlight the urgency of a comprehensive approach that integrates technology, sustainability, and global collaboration to address the challenges of digital transformation.
It is important to acknowledge that this study has limitations, such as the use of the Scopus database, which may not have encompassed all relevant research sources. Additionally, specific search criteria could have influenced the results. Furthermore, the bibliometric approach has inherent limitations in its ability to capture research quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.E.-R. and J.G.N.-S.; methodology, D.R.P. and G.R.-C.; software, L.E.C.C.; validation, L.E.-R., P.A.V.-T. and D.R.P.; formal analysis, P.A.V.-T.; investigation, L.E.-R.; resources, D.R.P.; data curation, J.G.N.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.E.-R.; writing—review and editing, J.G.N.-S.; visualization, L.E.-R. and G.R.-C.; supervision, P.A.V.-T. and G.R.-C.; project administration, L.E.C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable. This study has a bibliometric approach and the data used were generated from the Scopus database.

Acknowledgments

We thank the developers of the AI tools that were essential in our study: Microsoft Word and Excel, for improving texts and data analysis; DeepL, for its precise translations; ChatGPT, for facilitating the comparison of text translations; and Google Search, for optimizing information search. Their contribution to our research was applied always respecting ethical and legal principles.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Čirjevskis, A. Exploring Coupled Open Innovation for Digital Servitization in Grocery Retail: From Digital Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2022, 15, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McPhillips, M.; Nikitina, T.; Tegtmeier, S.; Wójcik, M. What Skills for Multi-Partner Open Innovation Projects? Open Innovation Competence Profile in a Cluster Ecosystem Context. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lavrynenko, A.; Shmatko, N.; Meissner, D. Managing skills for open innovation: The case of biotechnology. Manag. Decis. 2018, 56, 1336–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gómez-Galán, J.; Martínez-López, J.Á.; Lázaro-Pérez, C.; García-Cabrero, J.C. Open innovation during web surfing: Topics of interest and rejection by Latin American college students. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alakrash, H.M.; Razak, N.A.; Krish, P. The Application of Digital Platforms in Learning English Language. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 2022, 12, 899–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Espina-Romero, L. Post-pandemic scientific dissemination. Rev. Virtual Univ. Católica Norte 2023, 68, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Espina-Romero, L. Collaboration and interdisciplinarity in scientific research: Fostering synergy to address current challenges. IPSA Sci. Rev. Científica Multidiscip. 2023, 8, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maingi, S.W.; Wachira, H.M. Digital Skills and Tourism Workforce Recovery in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Case of Small and Medium-Sized Tourism Enterprises (Smtes) in Nairobi, Kenya; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paoloni, P.; Dal Mas, F.; Edvinsson, L. New Opportunities in the Time of a Crisis: Perspectives on Virtual Relational Capital Through a CAOS 4.0. In When the Crisis Becomes an Opportunity; SIDREA Series in Accounting and Business Administration; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Part F202; pp. 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Toscano-Jara, J.; Loza-Aguirre, E.; Franco-Crespo, A. Challenges for the Digital Transformation of Ecuador’s Tourism Industry: Perceptions of Leaders in Times of COVID-19; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Semerádová, T.; Weinlich, P.; Švermová, P. Evaluative Framework for Digital Competitiveness. In Achieving Business Competitiveness in a Digital Environment; Contributions to Management Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 27–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zupic, I.; Čater, T. Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organ. Res. Methods 2015, 18, 429–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ober, J.; Kochmańska, A. Remote Learning in Higher Education: Evidence from Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 14479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gerling, C.; Bickel, F.; Haskamp, T.; Uebernickel, F. Collaborate to Innovate: Utilizing Design Patterns Cards for Accelerating the Digital Transformation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Virtual, 3–7 January 2022; Volume 2022, pp. 5335–5344. [Google Scholar]
  16. Depaoli, P.; Za, S.; Scornavacca, E. A model for digital development of SMEs: An interaction-based approach. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2020, 27, 1049–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. van Heerden, D.; Goosen, L. Promoting the Growth of Fourth Industrial Revolution Information Communication Technology Students: The Implications for Open and Distance e-Learning; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhatti, M.A.; Juhari, A.S.; Alyahya, M.; Saat, S.A.M.; Alshiha, A.A.; Aldossary, M. Banking Customer Behavior and Banking Sector Performance: The Role of the Digital Infrastructure. J. Mod. Proj. Manag. 2022, 10, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zurdo, R.P.; Dopacio, C.I.; Paredes, V.R. Social sustainability and employment as a challenge of digital transformation: The new sixth digital sector of the economy. REVESCO Rev. Estud. Coop. 2022, 142, e83719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giacosa, E.; Culasso, F.; Crocco, E. Customer agility in the modern automotive sector: How lead management shapes agile digital companies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 175, 121362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mosupye-Semenya, L. A Conceptual Model for the Digital Inclusion of SMMEs in the Informal Sector in South Africa—The Use of Blockchain Technology to Access Loans. In Emerging Technologies for Developing Countries; Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering LNICST; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 503, pp. 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Joukhadar, G.; Jiang, R.; Harrington, K.; Thorogood, A. Promoting Digital Innovation for Sustainability in the Public Sector. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2023, 53, 240–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Edelmann, N.; Rodriguez Müller, A.P.; Steen, T.; Gerhardter, B.; Holzbauer, T. Sustainable Co-Creation in the Public Sector: A Case Study in the Lower Austrian Federal Government. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Guimarães, Portugal, 4–7 October 2022; pp. 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boufounou, P.; Mavroudi, M.; Toudas, K.; Georgakopoulos, G. Digital Transformation of the Greek Banking Sector in the COVID Era. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martínez-Bravo, M.C.; Sádaba Chalezquer, C.; Serrano-Puche, J. Delevopment of digital competences in online communities: An Analysis of scolartic. Prism. Soc. 2018, 20, 129–159. [Google Scholar]
  26. Magni, D.; Orlando, B.; Del Giudice, M. Exploiting digital skills in higher education: A case study analysis. In IT and the Development of Digital Skills and Competences in Education; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ibadango-Galeano, E.; Vargas-Chagna, L.; Gallegos Varela, M.; Vélez-Meza, M.; Placencia-Enriquez, E. Storytelling Digital: Experience and Technology in Designs of Tele-Collaborative Projects in Higher Education. In Applied Technologies; Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1388, pp. 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Prendes-Espinosa, P.; Solano-Fernández, I.M.; García-Tudela, P.A. Emdigital to promote digital entrepreneurship: The relation with open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bartoli, C.; Bonetti, E.; Mattiacci, A. Marketing geographical indication products in the digital age: A holistic perspective. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 2857–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nuccio, M.; Mogno, S. Knowledge, Skills, and Competences (KSC) in the Knowledge-Based Economy. In Mapping Digital Skills in Cultural and Creative Industries in Italy; Contributions to Management Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arnold, M.; Jung, S.; Fischer, H.; Zaraik, J.; Chevallier, P.; Efstathiou, A.; Boukas, N.; Sourouklis, C. The Use of Virtual Reality Roleplay to Improve Communicative and Digital Skills in a Transnational Collaborative Learning Environment: Implications for Teaching and Learning in Social Work Management Education. In Handbook of Applied Teaching and Learning in Social Work Management Education; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pintarić, N.; Tomasović, Z. Development of Digital Competence Framework for Open Science. In Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), Split/Bol, Croatia, 20–23 June 2023; p. 191291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Burnham, J.F. Scopus database: A review. Biomed. Digit. Libr. 2006, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Glänzel, W.; Schoepflin, U. A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Inf. Process Manag. 1999, 35, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hirsch, J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16569–16572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Garfield, E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 1972, 178, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R. Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization: Definitions and relations. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2000, 51, 1004–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Van Raan, A.F.J. Comparison of the hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics 2006, 67, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moed, H.F. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Callon, M.; Courtial, J.; Turner, W.; Bauin, S. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Soc. Sci. Inf. 1983, 22, 191–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leydesdorff, L.; Milojeviç, S. The Citation Impact of German Sociology Journals: Some Problems with the Use of Scientometric Indicators in Journal and Research Evaluations. Soz. Welt. 2015, 66, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fischbach, K.; Putzke, J.; Schoder, D. Co-authorship networks in electronic markets research. Electron. Mark. 2011, 21, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. León, G.; Leceta, J.M.; Tejero, A. Impact of the EIT in the creation of an open educational ecosystem: UPM experience. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2018, 10, 178–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Oliveira, R.; de Abreu, J.F.; Almeida, A.M. Promoting interactive television (iTV) accessibility: An adapted service for users with visual impairments. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2017, 16, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El Hilali, W.; El Manouar, A.; Janati Idrissi, M.A. Reaching sustainability during a digital transformation: A PLS approach. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2020, 12, 52–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huđek, I.; Širec, K.; Tominc, P. Digital skills in enterprises according to the european digital entrepreneurship sub-indices: Cross-country empirical evidence. Management 2019, 24, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kamberidou, I. “Distinguished” women entrepreneurs in the digital economy and the multitasking whirlpool. J. Innov. Entrep. 2020, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dresel, R.; Henkel, M.; Scheibe, K.; Zimmer, F.; Stock, W.G. A Nationwide Library System and Its Place in Knowledge Society and Smart Nation: The Case of Singapore. Libri 2020, 70, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sousa, M.J.; Cruz, R.; Rocha, Á.; Sousa, M. Innovation Trends for Smart Factories: A Literature Review. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2019, 930, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yuana, R.; Prasetio, E.A.; Syarief, R.; Arkeman, Y.; Suroso, A.I. System dynamic and simulation of business model innovation in digital companies: An open innovation approach. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Anshari, M.; Syafrudin, M.; Fitriyani, N.L. Fourth Industrial Revolution between Knowledge Management and Digital Humanities. Information 2022, 13, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Agarwal, G.K.; Simonsson, J.; Magnusson, M.; Hald, K.S.; Johanson, A. Value-capture in digital servitization. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2022, 33, 986–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gonzalez-Tamayo, L.A.; Maheshwari, G.; Bonomo-Odizzio, A.; Herrera-Avilés, M.; Krauss-Delorme, C. Factors influencing small and medium size enterprises development and digital maturity in Latin America. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alonso, S.L.N.; Jorge-Vázquez, J.; Rodríguez, P.A.; Hernández, B.M.S. Gender gap in the ownership and use of cryptocurrencies: Empirical evidence from Spain. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Arbeláez-Rendón, M.; Giraldo, D.P.; Lotero, L. Influence of digital divide in the entrepreneurial motor of a digital economy: A system dynamics approach. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Treviño-Elizondo, B.L.; García-Reyes, H. An Employee Competency Development Maturity Model for Industry 4.0 Adoption. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Karakose, T.; Kocabas, I.; Yirci, R.; Papadakis, S.; Ozdemir, T.Y.; Demirkol, M. The Development and Evolution of Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Mapping Approach-Based Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sarango-Lapo, C.P.; Mena, J.; Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. Evidence-based educational innovation model linked to digital information competence in the framework of education 4.0. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Priyono, A.; Moin, A.; Putri, V.N.A.O. Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of smes during the covid-19 pandemic. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Evseeva, S.; Evseeva, O.; Rawat, P. Employee Development and Digitalization in BANI World. In Innovations in Digital Economy; Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 1619, pp. 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hellwig, L.; Pawlowski, J.; Schäfer, M. How to Design a Business-Oriented Digitalized Innovation Environment: A Multi-perspective Approach. In Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management; Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 1718, pp. 150–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Scuotto, V.; Nicotra, M.; Del Giudice, M.; Krueger, N.; Gregori, G.L. A microfoundational perspective on SMEs’ growth in the digital transformation era. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 129, 382–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zahoor, N.; Zopiatis, A.; Adomako, S.; Lamprinakos, G. The micro-foundations of digitally transforming SMEs: How digital literacy and technology interact with managerial attributes. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 159, 113755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Siahaan, D.T.; Tan, C.S.L. What Drives the Adaptive Capability of Indonesian SMEs during the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Interplay between Perceived Institutional Environment, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Digital Capability. Asian J. Bus. Res. 2022, 12, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chatterjee, S.; Chaudhuri, R.; Vrontis, D.; Jabeen, F. Digital transformation of organization using AI-CRM: From microfoundational perspective with leadership support. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 153, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kamble, S.; Rana, N.P.; Gupta, S.; Belhadi, A.; Sharma, R.; Kulkarni, P. An effectuation and causation perspective on the role of design thinking practices and digital capabilities in platform-based ventures. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2023, 193, 122646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. de Obesso, M.D.L.M.; Núñez-Canal, M.; Pérez-Rivero, C.A. How do students perceive educators’ digital competence in higher education? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2023, 188, 122284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lu, H.T.; Li, X.; Yuen, K.F. Digital transformation as an enabler of sustainability innovation and performance—Information processing and innovation ambidexterity perspectives. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2023, 196, 122860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Silva, R.P.; Mamede, H.S. The Software Architecture Driving A Successful Digital Transformation within Small and Medium Enterprises. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Science and Systems, Beijing China, 26–28 August 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Santillan-Rosas, I.M.; Heredia-Escorza, Y. Empowering women’s digital literacy with transformative learning: Reducing the gap in the T of STEM. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca Spain, 21–23 October 2020; pp. 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, Y. Analyzing the mechanism of strategic orientation towards digitization and organizational performance settings enduring employee resistance to innovation and performance capabilities. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1006310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ko, D.W.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, H. Loneliness, Implicit-Self and Digital Literacy. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 701856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Schütz, M.; Schindler, A.; Siegel, M.; Nazemi, K. Automatic Fake News Detection with Pre-trained Transformer Models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Virtual, 10–15 January 2021; Volume 12667, pp. 627–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ayinde, L.; Astuti, H.M.; Hussain, S.; Herdiyanti, A. Investigating Factors Influencing Open Government from a Country’s Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information (iConference), Virtual, 13–17 March 2023; Volume 13971, pp. 221–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bui, M.T.; Le, H.L. Digital capability and creative capability to boost firm performance and formulate differentiated CSR-based strategy. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Darmanto, S.; Ekopriyono, A.; Hikmah; Tri Ratnawati, A. Investigating the development of entrepreneurial behavior among nascent digital entrepreneurs. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2023, 10, 2247875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nurlaela Arief, N.; Gustomo, A.; Rahman Roestan, M.; Putri, A.N.A.; Islamiaty, M. Pharma 4.0: Analysis on core competence and digital levelling implementation in pharmaceutical industry in Indonesia. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Opiso, J.; Korutaro Nkundabanyanga, S.; Tumwine, S.; Kigongo Kaawaase, T.; Senyonga, L.; Echegu, S. The digital era of taxation: Analysing the effectiveness of digital tax adoption on petroleum excise duty revenue. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2023, 10, 2272370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Simovic, V.; Domazet, I.; Bugarcic, M.; Safi, M.; Sarhan, H.; Bhagat, R.; Martinovic, A.B. The association of socio-demographic characteristics of university students and the levels of their digital entrepreneurial competences. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wijaya, L.I.; Ardiansyahmiraja, B.; Wicaksono, A.P.; Rianawati, A.; Hadi, F.S.; Silalahi, M.A.R.; Izharuddin, M.; Zunairoh. The impact of IT capability and organizational learning on halal food SMEs’ performance. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2023, 10, 2264562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Khin, S.; Ho, T.C.F. Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2019, 11, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Heredia, J.; Castillo-Vergara, M.; Geldes, C.; Carbajal Gamarra, F.M.; Flores, A.; Heredia, W. How do digital capabilities affect firm performance? The mediating role of technological capabilities in the “new normal”. J. Innov. Knowl. 2022, 7, 100171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Queiroz, M.M.; Pereira, S.C.F.; Telles, R.; Machado, M.C. Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities: A framework for understanding digitalisation challenges and opportunities. Benchmarking 2019, 28, 1761–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Herhausen, D.; Miočević, D.; Morgan, R.; Kleijnen, M. The digital marketing capabilities gap. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 90, 276–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cetindamar Kozanoglu, D.; Abedin, B. Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: Conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2021, 34, 1649–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kinkel, S.; Baumgartner, M.; Cherubini, E. Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing—Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies. Technovation 2022, 110, 102375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pertiwi, W.; Setyawati, S.M.; Anggraeni, A.I. Transformational Leadership, Digital Literacy, Propensity to Trust, and Creativity of MSMEs: Mediating Effects of Knowledge Sharing. J. Behav. Sci. 2023, 18, 69–82. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85174679632&partnerID=40&md5=fb4c4b49b0b330c49204d134e37ef42b (accessed on 29 February 2024).
  88. Pranita, D.; Sarjana, S.; Musthofa, B.M.; Kusumastuti, H.; Rasul, M.S. Blockchain Technology to Enhance Integrated Blue Economy: A Case Study in Strengthening Sustainable Tourism on Smart Islands. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chib, A.; Wardoyo, R.J. Differential OER impacts of formal and informal ICTs: Employability of female migrant workers. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 2018, 19, 94–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Susilawati, E.; Lubis, H.; Kesuma, S.; Pratama, K.; Khaira, I. Exploring Automated Short Essay Scoring (ASES) Technology Based Assessment Model: The Role of Operational Management Strategies to Improve Quality at Universities. Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl. 2022, 5, 244–261. [Google Scholar]
  91. Gijón, C.; Albarrán Lozano, I.; Molina, J.M. Perception of innovation in Spain. Digit. Policy Regul. Gov. 2023, 25, 185–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Marino-Romero, J.A.; Palos-Sanchez, P.R.; Velicia-Martin, F. Improving KIBS performance using digital transformation: Study based on the theory of resources and capabilities. J. Serv. Theory Pract. 2023, 33, 169–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhu, X.; Yu, S.; Yang, S. Leveraging resources to achieve high competitive advantage for digital new ventures: An empirical study in China. Asia Pacific Bus. Rev. 2023, 29, 1079–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wei, Y.; Zheng, Y. Research on the Evolution of Openness of Manufacturing Enterprise-led Industrial Internet Platform: A Case Study Based on Foxconn Fii Cloud Platform. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Project Management (ISPM2022), Beijing, China, 18 June 2022; pp. 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Luo, Y.; Zeng, L. Digital financial capabilities and household entrepreneurship. Econ. Polit. Stud. 2020, 8, 165–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Oggero, N.; Rossi, M.C.; Ughetto, E. Entrepreneurial spirits in women and men. The role of financial literacy and digital skills. Small Bus. Econ. 2020, 55, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rietmann, C. Corporate responsibility and place leadership in rural digitalization: The case of Hidden Champions. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2023, 31, 409–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lifintsev, D.; Wellbrock, W. Cross-cultural communication in the digital age. Estud. Comun. 2019, 1, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Frolova, E.V.; Rogach, O.V.; Medvedeva, N.V. Digitalization of Education Student Assessments and Factors of Its Formation in a Pandemic. Stud. Crit. Soc. Sci. 2023, 254, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Muñoz-Arteaga, J.; Guzmán Mendoza, J.E.; Reyes, H.C.; Mendoza-González, R. Collaborative content production model to reduce digital divide. In Human-Computer Interaction; Communications in Computer and Information; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 1114, pp. 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Samylovskaya, E.; Kudryavtseva, R.E.; Medvedev, D.; Grinyaev, S.; Nordmann, A. Transformation of the personnel training system for oil and gas projects in the Russian Arctic. Resources 2020, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Dabbous, A.; Barakat, K.A.; Kraus, S. The impact of digitalization on entrepreneurial activity and sustainable competitiveness: A panel data analysis. Technol. Soc. 2023, 73, 102224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fernandes, C.; Ferreira, J.J.; Raposo, M.L.; Estevão, C.; Peris-Ortiz, M.; Rueda-Armengot, C. The dynamic capabilities perspective of strategic management: A co-citation analysis. Scientometrics 2017, 112, 529–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lafuente, E.; Vaillant, Y.; Rabetino, R. Digital disruption of optimal co-innovation configurations. Technovation 2023, 125, 102772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Neumeyer, X.; Santos, S.C. Educating the Engineer Entrepreneur of the Future: A Team Competency Perspective. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2023, 70, 684–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Nationsonline. Nations Online. Nations Online Project. Published 2014. Available online: https://nationsonline.org/oneworld/sitemap.htm (accessed on 31 August 2023).
  107. Calzada, I. Postpandemic Technopolitical Democracy: Algorithmic Nations, Data Sovereignty, Digital Rights, and Data Cooperatives. In Contributions to Political Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Erol, G.; Deliormanli, A.; Düşmezkalender, E. A Tourism Accommodation Perspective in a Postpandemic Nature-Based Tourism Development Context. In The Routledge Handbook of Nature Based Tourism Development; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2023; pp. 474–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cramarenco, R.E.; Burcă-Voicu, M.I.; Dabija, D.C. The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on employees’ skills and well-being in global labor markets: A systematic review. Oeconomia Copernic. 2023, 14, 731–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tchelidze, L. Potential and skill requirements of artificial intelligence in digital marketing. Qual.-Access Success 2019, 20, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
  111. Espina-Romero, L.; Sánchez, J.G.N.; Hurtado, H.G.; Conde, H.D.; Castro, Y.S.; Cajo, L.E.C.; Corredoira, J.R. Which Industrial Sectors Are Affected by Artificial Intelligence? A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Perspectives. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dneprovskaya, N.; Chris Kang, S.B.; Shevtsova, I. Evolution of the Competencies to Embrace Digital Technology for Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, 29 April–5 May 2022; p. 179030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Danladi, S.; Prasad, M.S.V.; Modibbo, U.M.; Ahmadi, S.A.; Ghasemi, P. Attaining Sustainable Development Goals through Financial Inclusion: Exploring Collaborative Approaches to Fintech Adoption in Developing Economies. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. He, H.; Bin, S.; Chen, Y. Research on the Blockchain Digital Capability Platform for “No Proof City”. In Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Information Technology (AICIT), Yichang, China, 15–17 September 2023; p. 193581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Aaldering, L.J.; Song, C.H. Of leaders and laggards—Towards digitalization of the process industries. Technovation 2021, 105, 102211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Pierre, S.L.J.; Vergara, R.I.C.; Hellen, L.V. Effects of the use of digital technologies on the performance of firms in a developing country: Are there differences between creative and manufacturing industries? Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag. 2022, 10, 73–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Espina-Romero, L.; Aguirre Franco, S.; Dworaczek Conde, H.; Guerrero-Alcedo, J.; Ríos Parra, D.; Rave Ramírez, J. Soft skills in personnel training: Report of publications in scopus, topics explored and future research agenda. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Espina-Romero, L.; Noroño Sánchez, J.G.; Rojas-Cangahuala, G.; Palacios Garay, J.; Parra, D.R.; Rio Corredoira, J. Digital Leadership in an Ever-Changing World: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Challenges. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. George-Reyes, C.E. Imbrication of computational thinking and digital literacy. Modeling from a systematic review of the literatura. Rev. Esp. Doc. Cient. 2023, 46, e345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. George Reyes, C.E.; Avello-Martínez, R. Digital literacy in education. Systematic review of scientific production in Scopus. Rev. Int. Relac. Públicas 2021, 21, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Poszytek, P.; Hyrcza-Michalska, M.; Brodny, J.; Wawrzała, P.; Gębal, P.; Lisok, J.; Kruszewska, J.; Sigurðardóttir, A.G.; Bugnova, M.; Dobrowolska, M. Theoretical Review of Research to Date on Competences 4.0—What Do We Know about Competences in Industry 4.0? A Status Quo Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Obermayer, N.; Csizmadia, T.; Hargitai, D.M. Influence of Industry 4.0 technologies on corporate operation and performance management from human aspects. Meditari Account. Res. 2022, 30, 1027–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Koehorst, M.M.; van Deursen, A.J.A.M.; van Dijk, J.A.G.M.; de Haan, J. A Systematic Literature Review of Organizational Factors Influencing 21st-Century Skills. SAGE Open. 2021, 11, 21582440211067251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Barrantes, R.; Vargas, E. Inequalities in the Appropriation of Digital Spaces in Metropolitan Areas of Latin America. In Catalyzing Development through ICT Adoption; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Azionya, C.M.; Nhedzi, A. The Digital Divide and Higher Education Challenge with Emergency Online Learning: Analysis of Tweets in the Wake of the Covid-19 Lockdown. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 2021, 22, 164–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Fitz, L.R.G.; Scheeg, M.; Scheeg, J. Amplifying Human Factors in the Inquiry of SMEs’ Needs in Digitalization Collaborations with External Service Providers. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 200, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Bernardes, E.; Legenvre, H. Accessing and Integrating Distant Capabilities in Smart Industry Projects. Adv. Ser. Manag. 2022, 28, 125–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Baran, M.; Baran, M.; Karakoyun, F.; Maskan, A. The Influence of Project-Based STEM (PjbL-STEM) Applications on the Development of 21st-Century Skills. J. Turk. Sci. Educ. 2021, 18, 798–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rachmawati, R.; Sari, A.D.; Sukawan, H.A.R.; Widhyastana, I.M.A.; Ghiffari, R.A. The use of ict-based applications to support the implementation of smart cities during the covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Infrastructures 2021, 6, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zheng, Q.; Gou, J.; Camarinha-Matos, L.M.; Zhang, J.Z.; Zhang, X. Digital capability requirements and improvement strategies: Organizational socialization of AI teammates. Inf. Process. Manag. 2023, 60, 103504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. De Felice, F.; Petrillo, A. An interdisciplinary framework to define strategies for digitalization and sustainability: Proposal of a ‘digicircular’ model. IET Collab. Intell. Manuf. 2021, 3, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 16 02119 g001
Figure 1. PRISMA method—process of sample selection.
Figure 1. PRISMA method—process of sample selection.
Sustainability 16 02119 g001
Sustainability 16 02119 g002
Figure 2. Integrity of bibliographic metadata (source: RStudio).
Figure 2. Integrity of bibliographic metadata (source: RStudio).
Sustainability 16 02119 g002
Sustainability 16 02119 g003
Figure 3. Main information (source: RStudio).
Figure 3. Main information (source: RStudio).
Sustainability 16 02119 g003
Sustainability 16 02119 g004
Figure 4. Evolution of digital competencies: 2017–2023.
Figure 4. Evolution of digital competencies: 2017–2023.
Sustainability 16 02119 g004
Sustainability 16 02119 g005
Figure 5. Global map of research in digital competencies and open innovation.
Figure 5. Global map of research in digital competencies and open innovation.
Sustainability 16 02119 g005
Table 1. Comparative table between studies.
Table 1. Comparative table between studies.
AspectPrevious StudiesPresent Study
ApproachFocus on digital competencies in specific contexts (education, marketing, open science, etc.).Specific focus on digital competencies in the context of open innovation in various fields.
Research QuestionsVarious research questions depending on the focus of each study.Five specific research questions that address the trends, impacts, and current state of digital competencies in relation to open innovation.
Temporal ScopeSeveral years of examined publications, but without a specific time focus.Time-specific focus from 2017 to 2023, allowing for the identification of recent trends.
Relevance of Open InnovationFocus on digital competencies without an explicit link to open innovation.Highlights the relationship between digital competencies and open innovation, addressing how they are related in various areas.
Impact and TrendsFocus on describing digital competencies without an emphasis on impact and trends in the literature.Assesses the impact and trends in the academic literature related to digital competencies in the context of open innovation.
ContributionContribute to knowledge in their specific areas.Provides a comprehensive overview of the state of research on digital competencies in open innovation, identifying key trends and future directions.
UsefulnessUseful for researchers in specific fields (education, marketing, etc.).Useful for researchers interested in understanding the relationship between digital competencies and open innovation in various fields, providing guidance for future activities.
Table 2. Relevant sources.
Table 2. Relevant sources.
Relevant SourcesArticlesh-IndexTC
“Sustainability (Switzerland)”267146
“Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity”74293
“Communications in Computer and Information Science”612
“Journal of Business Research”5383
“Technological Forecasting and Social Change”5248
“ACM International Conference Proceeding Series”411
“Frontiers in Psychology”416
“Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)”4111
“Cogent Business and Management”326
“Heliyon”327
Table 4. Key areas and questions for future research.
Table 4. Key areas and questions for future research.
ApproachResearch Question
Post-pandemic digital transformationHow has the pandemic impacted the acceleration of digital competencies in different sectors and what lessons can we learn? [107,108]
Artificial intelligence and digital competenciesHow is artificial intelligence redesigning digital competencies in the labor market and education? [109,110,111]
Digital competencies for sustainable developmentHow can digital competencies be integrated to promote sustainable development and what roles can they play in the UN Sustainable Development Goals? [112,113]
Emergence of new technologies and educationWhich digital competencies will be considered essential in response to technologies such as augmented reality, robotics, and blockchain? [88,114]
Open innovation and organizational transformationHow can organizations leverage open innovation to implement digital competencies effectively? [56,85]
Emerging trends in digital competenciesWhat new trends in digital competencies have emerged post-2023 and how are they expected to evolve? [8,49]
Digital competencies in various sectorsHow does the effectiveness of digital competencies implementation vary across different industries? [115,116]
Digital competencies and leadershipWhat digital competencies are crucial for leaders looking to drive open innovation and digital transformation? [117,118]
Digital literacy gapsWhat are the most significant gaps in digital literacy between demographic groups and how can they be addressed? [119,120]
Challenges and opportunities of Industry 4.0What are the challenges and opportunities presented by Industry 4.0 and how can companies prepare? [121,122]
Influencing factors in researchWhat factors drive the development of research on digital competencies in different regions? [74,123]
Gaps and inequalities in international researchWhy do some countries show a high volume of publications with a low number of citations and what does this reveal? [124,125]
International collaborations and their impactHow do transnational collaborations influence the production of research in digital competencies? [126,127]
Practical application of researchHow does research in digital competencies translate into effective open innovation practices? [128,129]
Strategies to increase research participationWhat strategies can countries with less research adopt to increase their participation? [130,131]
Table 5. Synthesis of results.
Table 5. Synthesis of results.
Research QuestionMain Results
RQ1—Trends and changes in digital competencies research (2017–2023)Annual growth of 59.56% in research from 2017 to 2023. Evolution of topics from ‘ecosystems’ and ‘digital literacies’ to ‘digital technologies’, ‘digital economy’, and the integration of digitalization with sustainability and innovation.
RQ2—Trends and impact in the scientific literaturePublications and citations in journals such as “Sustainability (Switzerland)” and “Journal of Open Innovation”. Influential articles on digital transformation, digital technology and organizational performance, and Industry 4.0 challenges.
RQ3—Key trends and impacts of digital competencies in organizationsInfluence of digital competencies on digital adaptation during crises (e.g., COVID-19). Role of employees in digital transformation.
RQ4—Status and trends in knowledge productionLeadership of Indonesia and Spain in number of documents. Global distribution shows significant differences in research production and impact.
RQ5—Future research directionsProposed areas: impact of the pandemic on digital competencies, influence of AI on the labor market, and digital competencies for sustainable development.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Espina-Romero, L.; Ríos Parra, D.; Noroño-Sánchez, J.G.; Rojas-Cangahuala, G.; Cervera Cajo, L.E.; Velásquez-Tapullima, P.A. Navigating Digital Transformation: Current Trends in Digital Competencies for Open Innovation in Organizations. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052119

AMA Style

Espina-Romero L, Ríos Parra D, Noroño-Sánchez JG, Rojas-Cangahuala G, Cervera Cajo LE, Velásquez-Tapullima PA. Navigating Digital Transformation: Current Trends in Digital Competencies for Open Innovation in Organizations. Sustainability. 2024; 16(5):2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Espina-Romero, Lorena, Doile Ríos Parra, José Gregorio Noroño-Sánchez, Gloria Rojas-Cangahuala, Luz Emerita Cervera Cajo, and Pedro Alfonso Velásquez-Tapullima. 2024. "Navigating Digital Transformation: Current Trends in Digital Competencies for Open Innovation in Organizations" Sustainability 16, no. 5: 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052119

APA Style

Espina-Romero, L., Ríos Parra, D., Noroño-Sánchez, J. G., Rojas-Cangahuala, G., Cervera Cajo, L. E., & Velásquez-Tapullima, P. A. (2024). Navigating Digital Transformation: Current Trends in Digital Competencies for Open Innovation in Organizations. Sustainability, 16(5), 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop