Next Article in Journal
A Bibliometrics Analysis Related to the Built Environment and Walking
Previous Article in Journal
The Power of Responsibility: Unlocking the Potential of CSR in Hospitality’s Fight against Food Waste
Previous Article in Special Issue
Socioeconomic Importance of the Small-Scale Mud Crab Fishing (Scylla Serrata, Forskall 1775) in the Bons Sinais Estuary—Mozambique
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Anthropogenic Activities on Sardinella maderensis (Lowe, 1838) Fisheries in Coastal Communities of Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria

1
Africa Centre of Excellence in Coastal Resilience, Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Biological Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast P.O. Box 5007, Ghana
2
Department of Marine Sciences, University of Lagos, Akoka 101017, Nigeria
3
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Ikorodu 101233, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 2848; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072848
Submission received: 28 November 2023 / Revised: 20 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 29 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fisheries Management and Sustainability)

Abstract

:
Small-scale fisheries are significant sources of nutrition and livelihood globally. However, increasing anthropogenic activities in coastal areas of developing countries have threatened the sustainability of artisanal fisheries and species. Fisheries of Sardinella maderensis, towards the global stock of which Nigeria contributes 9% and which is a significant livelihood source in the coastal communities of Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, faces sustainability threats. This research investigated the effects of anthropogenic activities on S. maderensis fisheries in the coastal areas of Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria. The study adopted a mixed-method approach involving qualitative and quantitative research methods. These included species identification, water quality analysis, land-use change analysis, field surveys, focus group discussions, and interviews. Genetic analysis of the fish samples from the study area revealed that the species had a mean of 98% similarity to S. maderensis. While major urban and industrial land use has increased by 175% in the last four decades, the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of S. maderensis declined monthly to 0.0072 kg/H between 2003 and 2019. Linear regression indicated that anthropogenic variables explained approximately 39.58% of the variation in the CPUE (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.40). Water samples showed that heavy metal levels were above international limits, with high total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) pollution in all stations (27.56 mg/L–3985.40 mg/L). Physiochemical analysis of water samples indicated TDS levels higher than the acceptable limits (mean = 24,971.1 mg/L) and inadequate chlorophyll-a levels (mean = 0.01 µg/L). Hence, urgent strategies are required to mitigate anthropogenic threats through inclusive coastal management policies supporting resilient artisanal fisheries.

1. Introduction

Fisheries support about 600 million people’s livelihoods and supply 214 million tons of fish and 17% of animal protein consumption among the world’s population [1,2]. Globally, fish, among other aquatic foods, are high-demand products, reaching a production value of USD 424 billion in 2020 and substantially contributing to many countries’ gross domestic products (GDPs), alleviating poverty and fostering nutritional security [2]. In Nigeria, fish is a vital source of protein, and fisheries constitute a significant sector of the economy, contributing approximately 5.40% of the country’s GDP [3]. A country report by the FAO [4] states that small-scale fisheries dominate fish production in Nigeria by contributing over 80% of Nigeria’s total domestic fish production. Small-scale fisheries are prominent along the Nigerian coast, especially along the Ibeju-Lekki coastline, which extends for about 75 km of the total 180 km of the Lagos state coastline, contributing the highest percentage of fish caught with respect to other coastal sections [5]. The fisheries are multi-species fisheries with a dominance of Sardinella spp. and Caranx spp. [6,7,8]. Despite high catches of these species that have attracted local artisanal fishers and foreign nationals, there is limited knowledge of the effect of anthropogenic factors on the abundance indices of the Sardinella spp. on the Lagos coastline, which have some of the highest economic values to the fisherfolk [7].
Sardinella maderensis (Lowe, 1838) is commonly known as Madeiran sardinella or flat Sardinella and is locally called Sawa. It is a schooling pelagic fish from the Clupeidae family [9]. It has an elongated body with a variable depth, black or blue/green colouring, and silvery flanks. Its size is usually 20–25 cm, and it inhabits the near-surface of coastal waters, shoaling at the surface or the bottom, down to 50 m. It feeds on various small planktonic invertebrates, fish larvae, and phytoplankton. S. maderensis is presently found in 43 countries worldwide, with Africa dominating the global fish catch. Using a ten-year average (2008–2017), Nigeria is the third highest contributor of S. maderensis, being responsible for 9% of the species’ global catch [10]. S. maderensis dominates small-scale marine fisheries and is the main species captured in Nigeria’s coastal waters, providing livelihood sources, nutrition, and income for several poor coastal communities in Nigeria [4]. S. maderensis is one of Nigeria’s most abundant and economically valuable coastal pelagic species [11,12]. It accounts for 69% of the fish caught by artisanal fishers in the Ibeju-Lekki locality [7].
In the last few decades, anthropogenic activities have increased along the Nigerian coastline due to rapid population growth linked to industrialisation [13,14]. This growth has resulted in significant human pressures on marine ecosystems and biological stocks [15]. Massive industrial activities and urban developments have threatened the pelagic fish populations due to the degradation of coastal habitats in which S. maderensis is endemic [12,16]. Moreover, industrial developments associated with the Lekki Free Trade Zone, including dredging and land reclamation for the construction of the seaport and the petrochemical refinery, have destroyed mangroves and coastal habitats crucial to S. maderensis [15]. Polluting effluents such as petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals from industries threaten water quality, causing a decline in ecosystem services and environmental sustainability [17,18,19]. In addition, inefficient fishing standards and illegal and unregulated fishing have negatively impacted the fisheries’ sustainability, leading to significant changes in species composition and decreased catches [20,21]. Altogether, escalating anthropogenic pressures threaten the sustainability of small-scale fisheries and the livelihoods of Ibeju-Lekki communities.
A few studies have investigated the effects of anthropogenic activities on fisheries, emphasising the impacts on the broader coastal fisheries in Nigeria [22,23]. However, there is limited knowledge on how increasing anthropogenic activities affect S. maderensis fisheries and the livelihoods of fisherfolk in the coastal communities of Ibeju-Lekki. Filling the knowledge gap respecting the effects of anthropogenic activities on S. maderensis fisheries in Ibeju-lekki is imperative for building fishers’ resilience and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1, 2, and 14. Moreover, findings from the study will provide empirical evidence on how anthropogenic activities affect S. maderensis fisheries and fishers’ livelihoods in Nigeria. The outcome will inform policy interventions to mitigate pollution, habitat degradation, and over-exploitation, promoting resilience in small-scale fisheries that will sustain livelihoods and conserve biodiversity in Nigeria.
In its objectives, the study sought to confirm the identity of the Sardinella species exploited in Ibeju-Lekki fisheries using genetic and morphological techniques; analyse the land use and land cover changes over time using geospatial analysis; and assess water pollution levels and habitat degradation through water quality analysis. Anthropogenic factors were correlated with S. maderensis abundance to examine what relationships exist. The fisherfolks’ perceptions of anthropogenic impact and vulnerability were elucidated, and strategies for mitigating anthropogenic threats and promoting resilient small-scale fisheries were recommended for adoption.

2. Literature Review

Globally, small-scale fisheries employ millions of fishers and are significant sources of nutrition, food security, and livelihood, catering for many people [24]. However, increasing anthropogenic pressures threaten the sustainability of many small-scale fisheries [25,26]. Major anthropogenic threats include pollution and habitat degradation from coastal developments and overfishing [27,28,29]. These human activities pose severe sustainability threats to small pelagic species, which support food security in West Africa [30]. These stresses damage breeding grounds, reduce productivity, and threaten important species like S. maderensis [31,32].
S. maderensis is a dominant species in Nigerian small-scale fisheries [4]; however, the species is rated by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as “vulnerable” [12]. According to Akintola and Fakoya [14], the availability of the Clupeids family, to which Sardinella spp. belong, has diminished over the last decade due to habitat destruction and overfishing. Furthermore, the existing literature on the spatiotemporal dynamics, demographic parameters, and abundance indices of S. maderensis have focused on other West African coasts, excluding Nigeria. These include areas of the Ivory Coast [33], Cameroon [34], Benin [35], Liberia [36], and Ghana [37]. Being a vulnerable species, understanding anthropogenic impacts on S. maderensis is crucial to its sustainable management and conservation efforts; hence, correct species identification and insight into its genetic diversity are essential for its adaptability and resilience to human-induced and environmental changes [38,39,40]. Moreover, measuring the anthropogenic effects on S. maderensis species has been constrained by limited stock assessments and species identification, which provide pivotal knowledge for fisheries management [41,42,43]. Despite calls by the Food and Agricultural Organization [44] for species-specific research on the S. maderensis species in Nigeria, this has remained elusive; therefore, this study undertakes species identification as a precursor to investigating anthropogenic threats to S. maderensis fisheries.
Lagos’s extensive coastal area has undergone rapid transformation due to urbanisation, industrialisation, and population growth, creating complex environmental problems due to unpredictability and scale diversity [45]. The increasing demand for fish for human consumption has steadily increased the fishing efforts of small-scale fisheries in recent years [46]. While these escalating pressures threaten the sustainability of small-scale fisheries, only a few studies have elucidated localised risks and impacts, including the effects of anthropogenic pressures on the S. maderensis fisheries in Nigeria [8,14,47,48]. Hence, explicating localised threats will inform policies for the sustainability of the S. maderensis fisheries and fishers’ livelihoods in Lagos’s coastal waters.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Description of the Study Area

The study area is Ibeju-Lekki, a municipality (local government area) in Lagos State, Nigeria, as shown in Figure 1. Lagos State lies between latitude 6°20′ N to 6°40′ N and longitude 2°45′ E to 4°20′ E. The Lagos coastline stretches 180 km across the Atlantic Ocean, constituting 22.5% of Nigeria’s 853 km coastline. Although Lagos is spatially the smallest state in Nigeria, it is the most densely populated, occupying a landmass of 3577 sq. km., of which about 786.94 sq. km. (22%) consists of lagoons and creeks [49,50]. Ibeju-Lekki, a leading fishing area in Lagos State, covers approximately 75 km of the Lagos coastline [6,7]. About 80 coastal and lagoon communities exist in Ibeju-Lekki, with small-scale fisheries being a significant source of livelihood [8,51].

3.2. Field Surveys

Field surveys were conducted to elicit responses from 30 coastal communities where S. maderensis fishing occurs in Ibeju-Lekki. Interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and observations were primary data collection methods used to derive perceptions of the targeted population of 1879 S. maderensis fishers in Ibeju-Lekki coastal communities (Table 1). Systematic random sampling was used to select 360 fishers proportionately across the 30 communities for interviews, while seven focus group discussions (FGDs) involving 6 to 10 fishers were conducted based on the principle of saturation [51]. Data collection instruments included a structured interview schedule and an FDG guide. Structured schedules contained variables on socio-demographics and fisherfolk’s perceptions of vulnerabilities and effects of anthropogenic activities on their livelihoods. A test to validate the instrument returned a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.823, indicating the instrument’s reliability. FGDs were used to obtain qualitative and more explicit responses to questions.

3.3. Fish Species Identification

Fish samples were collected from five out of the seven major landing sites shown in Figure 2, namely, Orimedu, Lekki, Magbon-Segun, Lepiya, and Folu, monthly between January 2021 and March 2022 and identified through morphological examinations conducted at the Marine Research Laboratory of the Department of Marine Sciences, University of Lagos, Nigeria. Biometric features of the fish species were examined, and identifications were completed using guidelines [52,53]. Key morphometric and meristic characteristics were examined to identify the Sardinella spp. species collected. Twelve (12) fish samples were used for the genetic analysis based on standards employed by Ward et al. [54], Ivanova et al. [55], and Kim et al. [56]. DNA was extracted from the fish fin tissues, and the cytochrome oxidase gene was sequenced using published primers [57]. The genetic analysis was performed by DNA extraction of the genomic DNA and PCR amplification using a synthesised primer for forward and backward reactions. The extracted fragments were sequenced using the Nimagen BrilliantDyeTM Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit V3.1. An ABI350xl Genetic Analyzer was used to analyse the purified fragments. The ab1 files generated were edited using BioEditSequence Alignment Editor version 7.2.5, and a BLAST search in NCBI was conducted to obtain the results.

3.4. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change Analysis

Landsat imageries were acquired from the United States Geological Surveys/Earth Resources and Observation Science (USGS/EROS) website and processed to determine the land use/land cover changes in Ibeju-Lekki coastal areas over about 36 years. As shown in Table 2, the satellite imageries used in this research include Landsat TM (Thematic Mapper) for 1984, which is the base year, Landsat ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus) for 2002, and Landsat OLI_TIRS (Operational Land Imager and Thermal Infrared Sensors) for 2020. The research adopted three (3) temporal periods based on Landsat imageries available to conduct a 36-year multi-temporal land-use change analysis from multi-spectral remote sense data for available periods (1984, 2002, and 2020). The spatiotemporal analysis provides concrete evidence to corroborate field data on environmental changes obtained from the field surveys in Ibeju-Lekki coastal areas.
False-colour RGB composite raster imageries (Bands 4,5,1 for Landsat 7 and Bands 5,6,1 for Landsat 8) were derived using ArcGIS Software version 10.3. A subset of the composite imageries limited to the AOI (area of interest—a 2 km buffer along the coastline) was extracted using a clip geoprocessing tool in ArcGIS (Figure 3). The RGB composite imageries were classified utilising the ISODATA unsupervised algorithm [58]. Imageries were synchronised with Google Earth, and ground truthing was performed to validate the classification. Change detection statistics were generated from land-use/land-cover change maps in TERRSET Software version 18.31.

3.5. Water Quality Analyses

The water quality monitoring was performed bi-monthly at six major fish landing sites from February 2021 to January 2022 to allow for a yearly observational study of seasonal variations. Samples were collected using standard methods to analyse physical and chemical parameters like salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, and heavy metals [59]. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) were estimated through solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography [60]. The study used a solid-phase extraction (SPE) column separation method to remove organic and polar species from the water samples. The samples were eluted, evaporated, and reconstituted. The extracts were analysed for TPHs using a gas chromatograph fortified with a flame ionisation detector. Heavy metal analysis involved adding nitric acid to water samples, heating, cooling, filtering, and determining metal contents using the PG 990 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer.

3.6. Trends Analysis of S. maderensis Abundance

Monthly landing records for 2003 to 2019 were obtained for artisanal fisheries in Ibeju-Lekki from the Lagos State Agricultural Development Agency (LSADA) and the Federal Department of Fisheries (FDF) Nigerian repositories. Monthly landing records for S. maderensis fish catches in Ibeju-Lekki were obtained from LSADA and FDF records to calculate the monthly total catch, total efforts, and average catch per unit effort (CPUE). According to Arizi et al. [61] and Stobart et al. [62], catch per unit effort (CPUE) measures species abundance in fisheries. CPUE can be estimated by the quantity of the fish catch (weight) per unit of effort expended (time), which is proportional to the stock size [63]. Given an average of 7 h per trip, according to LSADA and the field survey, the CPUE was calculated using the formula:
Average   CPUE = Total   Catch   in   weight   or   numbers Total   Efforts   in   hours
Hence, having estimated the CPUE, monthly data compiled from 2003 to 2019 were used to generate a trend analysis of the CPUE of S. maderensis with a view to determining its implications for S. maderensis fisheries management and conservation efforts in Ibeju-Lekki. Trend analysis has been widely used to evaluate fish stock and fishing practices [64]. Also, to augment the observations on S. maderensis fisheries, fishers’ local ecological knowledge (LEK) was used to understand anthropogenic factors responsible for the trend.

3.7. Percieved Anthropogenic Effects on S. maderensis Abundance

Collective perceptions held by fishers, also known as local ecological knowledge (LEK), offer crucial insights into trends in fish populations and anthropogenic impacts on small-scale fisheries, including fisheries management [65,66,67]. LEK, which adopts systematic and in-depth interviews of fishers, has been used to leverage the assessment of fish abundance in several studies [66,68,69], thereby giving room for inclusive fishery management [67,70,71]. Fishers’ perceptions were obtained from interviews and analysed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive and inferential statistics were utilised to analyse fishers’ perceptions of anthropogenic factors affecting S. maderensis fisheries and vulnerability. The dependent variable, CPUE, which represents S. maderensis abundance, and independent variables, such as fishing effort (V_FISH_EFFORT), land use effect (V_LANDUSE), amenity needs (V_AMENITY), and access to markets (V_MKT), were derived from observed variables, as shown in Table 3. Fish abundance (CPUE) was predicted by the perceived anthropogenic factors that were statistically significant using the linear regression model.

4. Results

4.1. Fish Species Identification

The morphometrics-based identification system involving external or phenotypic features, including body shape, fin rays, and meristic counts, to identify the fish species revealed that the Sardinella spp. species exploited in Ibeju-Lekki are mainly S. maderensis (Figure 4). The fish showed features described by Whitehead [9] and Gourene and Teguels [72]. They had elongated bodies with a belly fairly sharply keeled, 18–23 dorsal soft rays and 17–23 anal soft rays, 70–166 lower gill rakers, and upper pectoral fin rays that were white on the outer side, and the membrane was black [9,52,72,73].
Genetic analysis using DNA barcoding also unambiguously confirmed the identity of the fish species in the study area as S. maderensis. The results of the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 22 December 2022)) reflect similarities between the search and the NCBI database’s biological sequences. The results derived from the analysis using the fish primer [54] indicated that all the samples were S. maderensis, with a mean percentage of 98.21% similarity to S. maderensis reference sequences in GenBank (Table 4). Hence, the results of the genetic analysis also confirmed that the fish samples were S. maderensis.

4.2. Land Use and Land Cover Change

Land-use change analysis of classified Landsat imageries of the AOI in Ibeju-Lekki revealed extensive changes in the coastal area over the past 36 years. Mangrove forests and cultivated lands declined by approximately 14% and 62%, respectively, between 1984 and 2020, while minor urban development increased by 48%, and land used for major urban/industrial development showed a tremendous increase of about 175% (Table 5).
The analysis in Table 5 indicates dynamic urban growth along the Ibeju-Lekki coastline, which also corroborates the claim by fishers that industrial developments, the Lekki Seaport, and the petrochemical refinery have significantly destroyed coastal habitats and displaced artisanal fishers in Ibeju-Lekki. Also, other urban land uses, such as residential, commercial, recreational, and institutional uses, are major anthropogenic activities that have taken over the fishing fields and disrupted artisanal fishing in the study area, as seen in the 1984 to 2020 land-cover change maps (Figure 5a–c).

4.3. Water Quality Analyses

The water quality results for the study period revealed that physical and chemical parameters like temperature, pH, salinity, dissolved oxygen, nitrate (NO3), and phosphate (PO4) levels were within tolerable ranges for fish survival, as shown in Table 6. However, the total dissolved solids (TDSs) and biological oxygen demand (BOD) exceeded the recommended levels, which indicated organic pollution from anthropogenic activities [74]. Additionally, the inadequate quantities of chlorophyll-a indicated insufficient food organisms for fish.
The results of the heavy metal analysis in Table 7 revealed that, though levels found in the study area were above the international standard limits set by the USEPA (1980–2016), the levels of lead, cadmium, iron, manganese, and nickel were within the national limits set by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA) in Nigeria [77]. However, chromium levels exceeded the national and international thresholds among the measured heavy metals in Ibeju-Lekki waters. Also, the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis showed that the TPH levels were generally high across all six stations (27.56 mg/L–3985.40 mg/L) when compared to the 10 mg/L permissible limit for coastal waters in Nigeria, indicating hydrocarbon pollution in all the sampled stations throughout the year. Overall, the findings of this study confirmed that coastal waters in Ibeju-Lekki are subject to pollution from industrial effluents and other anthropogenic activities.

4.4. Trends in S. maderensis Abundance

A trend analysis of CPUE (catch per unit effort) showed a consistent decline in the catches of the S. maderensis species in Ibeju-Lekki between 2003 and 2019, as shown in Figure 6. The trend line formula is displayed as:
y = 0.0072 x + 313.52
where y is the average CPUE and x represents time. The slope of the trend line defines the rate of change, which is −0.0072. The negative value of the slope is an indication that there has been a consistent, gradual decline in CPUE between 2003 and 2019. It also suggests a decline in the efficiency of catching S. maderensis over time, with the CPUE decreasing by an average of 0.0072 kg/H.
The decline in S. maderensis CPUE shown in Figure 6 suggests behavioural changes in the species, environmental degradation, ecological disturbance, or anthropogenic factors affecting the species and significantly increased fishing efforts [39,87,88]. The graph also shows that the value of R2 is 0.3886, which indicates that 38.86% of the variations in the CPUE are explained by the time trend, which reveals a moderate correlation between time and CPUE. Continuing this trend is unsustainable for the S. maderensis fisheries in Ibeju-Lekki.

4.5. Anthropogenic Factors Predicting S. maderensis Abundance

Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine anthropogenic factors that predict S. maderensis abundance based on fishers’ perceptions and experiences. Four independent variables (fishing effort, needed amenities, land use effects, and access to markets) were statistically significant, predicting 40% of the variability in the CPUE (catch per unit effort) of S. maderensis, representing abundance.
The results of the linear regression model were significant, as shown in Table 8, as approximately 39.58% (p < 0.001) of the variance in CPUE is explainable by V_FISH_EFFORT, V_AMENITY, V_LANDUSE, and V_MKT.
The regression model indicated that S. maderensis fish abundance (CPUE) is significantly predicted by fishing effort (V_FISH_EFFORT), needed amenities (V_AMENITY), land use (V_LANDUSE), and access to markets (V_MKT). Fishing efforts (V_FISH_EFFORT) significantly predicted CPUE negatively, B = −7.45 (p < 0.001). This indicates that every unit of fishing effort will decrease CPUE by 7.45 units. Excessive fishing efforts can negatively affect S. maderensis fisheries, leading to low yields. The effects of overfishing are corroborated in the literature [89,90,91]. Needed amenities (V_AMENITY) significantly predicted CPUE, B = −3.23, (p < 0.001), implying that as needs increase by one unit, CPUE decreases by 3.23 units. This means that reducing the needs of fishers by providing good roads, schools, telecommunications, etc., will increase the CPUE. The effect of land use changes (V_LANDUSE) negatively predicts CPUE, B = −0.85, (p = 0.002). On average, the effect of one unit of land use change in coastal communities significantly reduces fish abundance by 0.85 units. Conversely, access to markets (V_MKT) significantly enhances abundance (CPUE), B = 41.48 (p < 0.001). Access to markets will increase the CPUE by 41.48 units. The linear regression identified four significant predictors of S. maderensis abundance: fishing effort, needed amenities, land use effects, and access to markets, which collectively explain 40% of the variability in the CPUE, an indicator of fish abundance.
According to the survey results, most fishers attributed the decline in S. maderensis catches to encroachment and loss of fishing grounds due to industrial activities like the petrochemical refinery; critical transportation infrastructures, such as the Lekki Deep Sea Port; and other major urban land uses and anthropogenic activities in Ibeju-Lekki (Figure 7). In addition, 95% of the fishers claimed that their livelihoods and S. maderensis fisheries are affected mainly by the refinery’s development and other industrial land uses. Meanwhile, 57.5% of the fishers contended that the construction of the Lekki Deep Sea Port has led to a decline in the S. madenresis fisheries. Other land use activities like residential, commercial, and recreational developments have a shallow effect on the Sardinella spp. fisheries, as these activities affect less than 3% of the fishers, as shown in Figure 8.
In summary, the survey and analyses underscore the significant effects of land use change from once major fishing communities to major urban and industrial development, highlighting the vulnerability of coastal fishing communities. Fishers’ perceptions also provide valuable insights into the anthropogenic impacts on the S. madenresis fisheries and the need for sustainable coastal management strategies.

5. Discussion

This study provides empirical evidence on how growing anthropogenic pressures driven by industrialisation affect the S. maderensis fisheries, which coastal communities depend on for their nutrition and livelihoods. The massive land reclamation for constructing the Lekki Deep Sea Port and the petrochemical refinery has extensively damaged the coastal ecosystems in Ibeju-Lekki over time. Effluents from industrial and port activities also significantly pollute the coastal waters, increasing the anthropogenic pressures that threaten small-scale fisheries’ sustainability. While these massive developments seem to have economic advantages, they have inadvertently contributed to the decline of the S. maderensis fisheries, which are depended upon for nutrition and livelihoods in Ibeju-Lekki. However, several studies have emphasised balancing economic development, environmental conservation, and fisheries sustainability [92,93,94,95,96,97].
The land-use change analysis of Ibeju-Lekki reveals extensive change to urban/industrial development in the past 36 years, leading to the loss of mangrove and coastal forested areas. The findings of this study align with previous research conducted in other tropical regions, which emphasises the negative impacts of unsustainable coastal development on the resilience of fishing communities [98,99,100]. Mangroves, seagrass beds, and other coastal habitats are crucial as nursery grounds and provide ecological support for S. maderensis fisheries [101,102]. Previous studies show a correlation between declines in fish populations and habitat loss and degradation [103,104,105,106]. Consequently, the loss of habitats from anthropogenic activities like dredging, sand filling, construction, and industrial effluents destroys the ecological resources that sustain the S. maderensis fisheries in Ibeju-Lekki. Mitigating these adverse impacts requires spatial planning with integrated ecological knowledge and the enforcement of strict environmental management policies to protect fisheries and marine life [107].
Furthermore, the need for stringent environmental policies cannot be overemphasised, as industrial pollution creates a toxic ecosystem for fish survival. The physical and chemical parameter analysis results in Table 6 showed that water temperature, pH, salinity, dissolved oxygen, nitrate (NO3), and phosphate (PO4) levels were still within the ranges tolerable by S. maderensis [75,108]. However, the total dissolved solids (TDSs) values ranged between 11,500 mg/L and 30,000 mg/L and were higher than the acceptable limit of 2000 mg/L set by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency. These high TDSs values may affect gill and kidney functions and impact the survival and size of the fish. Mahboob et al. [109] recorded higher values of TDSs in their study of the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia, which was also characterised by prevalent anthropogenic activities similar to those found in Ibeju-Lekki, such as sand dredging, landfilling, and oil spills. The biological oxygen demand (BOD) values occasionally fell within an acceptable range but sometimes exceeded the lethal limit, with values as high as 11 mg/L. Hynes [74] states that BOD values higher than 8 mg/L point to severe pollution. The chlorophyll-a levels observed in Table 6 are inadequate, indicating insufficient phytoplankton abundance, potentially adversely affecting the S. maderensis populations due to their planktivorous feeding habits. Abdellaoui et al. [110] observed in their studies that changes in chlorophyll-a have a significant impact on sardine abundance, linking minimal chlorophyll-a levels to the gradual decline in yields of sardines in Al Hoceima, South Alboran Sea. Marine phytoplankton are essential not only as food to some fish species but also because they form the foundation of the marine food web [111,112].
The heavy metal analysis results indicate the effects of industrial pollution from the petrochemical refinery and deep sea port activities. These heavy metal analysis results can be used as baseline values for water quality in Ibeju-Lekki coastal waters because many industries have just started functioning within the last few years. Table 7 reveals that the lead, cadmium, iron, manganese and nickel levels, were within the national limits set by the FEPA in Nigeria but above the international standard limits. Also, the value for chromium in mg/L was above both the local and international standard limits. Previous studies attributed heavy metal pollution to anthropogenic activities in coastal waters [113,114]. For example, lead pollution could be due to oil spills, motorboats, and untreated wastes [114]; other sources include higher concentrations of metals from corrosion in marine construction, landfilling, and construction residuals [109]. The TPH values in the waters of the Ibeju-Lekki communities exceeded the limits of the FEPA standards, which could be attributed to oil spillage in the water [115]. These levels could lead to severe biological and economic impacts on the marine environment, which calls for an urgent regulatory intervention.
The decline in S. maderensis CPUE shown in the trend analysis (Figure 6) indicates a declining fish stock and a relatively low fish abundance over time. While a declining trend in CPUE is a common concern in fisheries management, it is often attributed to overfishing or ecosystem degradation [39,116]. However, the R2 = 0.3886 shows that about 61% of the variation in the CPUE is not explained by the time variable alone, suggesting other possible factors like environmental changes, economic or social policy changes, and unsustainable fishing practices. The research also indicates that without a significant shift in fisheries management and conservation practices, the trend may likely continue, aggravating the challenges faced by the marine ecosystem and fishing communities [117].
The fishers’ perceptions discussed in Section 4.5 reveal that four anthropogenic factors significantly predict S. maderensis abundance. The regression analysis in Table 8 shows that these four independent variables—fishing effort, needed amenities, land use effect, and access to markets—were statistically significant, accounting for 40% of the variability in CPUE, representing fish abundance. This indicates a relatively strong relationship between these anthropogenic factors and rates of catching fish. This finding is consistent with previous findings on the influence of anthropogenic factors on fish stocks, which has been well documented in fisheries science [118,119,120,121,122,123,124]. Also, aligning findings from fishers’ perceptions with the literature indicated that LEK is crucial in understanding non-biological stressors predicting fish abundance [67,68,71,125].
Fishers in Ibeju-Lekki considered fishing efforts to have a negative relationship with fish abundance. Table 8 shows that CPUE decreases by 7.45 units for every unit increase in the fishing effort variable (V_FISH_EFFORT). This result corroborates the literature on the effect of overfishing on fish abundance [39,117,126]. This result requires that fishing efforts be managed to avoid overexploitation and ensure the sustainability of the S. maderensis fisheries. Previous studies suggested that controlled fishing practices and fisheries management systems, grounded on rights-based principles that co-opt fishers in the management process, could help mitigate overfishing and empower fishing communities effectively [39,127].
Furthermore, this research corroborates previous studies asserting that land use and habitat alterations can significantly impact marine ecosystems and fish abundance [118,119,128]. The results in Table 8 show that the land-use effect variable (V_LANDUSE) is a significant predictor of fish abundance, with a negative coefficient of −0.85 (p = 0.002), indicating that the ongoing massive coastal developments like the petrochemical refinery, the deep sea port, and other significant urban developments have a negative impact on the S. maderensis fisheries. The results underscore the need for sustainable marine spatial planning (MSP).
In addition, the government and stakeholders should augment MSP by providing needed amenities and market access. On the one hand, needed amenities (V_AMENITY) negatively predicts CPUE with a regression coefficient (B) value of −3.23 (p < 0.001), indicating that for every unit of deficiency of needed amenities, the CPUE decreases by 3.23 units, implying that providing needed amenities in fishing communities will enhance the fishing efficiency and fish abundance. On the other hand, access to markets (V_MKT) is the only positive predictor of CPUE, with a B value of 41.48 (p < 0.001), indicating that fish abundance is strongly influenced by better access to markets. The results also reinforce the importance of amenities and market access as drivers of small-scale fisheries. This study also resonates with studies by Bene et al. [129,130] on the role of socioeconomic drivers in sustaining small-scale fisheries.
The findings generally emphasise the necessity of adopting a comprehensive and inclusive strategy for coastal development that safeguards the fundamental natural resources that sustain the local population’s livelihoods [131]. Presently, existing development plans and policies for Ibeju-Lekki emphasise top-down development strategies prioritising industrial enterprises, aiming to achieve economic benefits. However, these policies overlook the socio-ecological impacts on marginalised small-scale fisheries [132]. Nevertheless, neglecting these consequences undermines long-term sustainability. Hence, an ecosystems-based approach in fisheries management and an integrated marine spatial planning strategy for land and water use are needed to conserve vital fish habitats [133,134]. Implementing rigorous water quality monitoring and strict enforcement of effluent standards is crucial for mitigating industrial pollution, and controlling detrimental activities such as unregulated sand dredging, which harms resilience, is also necessary. Additionally, the implementation of fisheries management systems based on rights-based principles has the potential to mitigate overfishing and empower fishing communities effectively [135]. In general, mitigating anthropogenic threats necessitates the implementation of multi-level governance approaches that effectively balance economic development, ecological sustainability, and social equity [136].
This investigation provides a framework for research approaches to assess anthropogenic threats in small-scale fisheries in developing countries. In summary, this research highlights the importance of addressing human-induced challenges such as pollution and habitat loss to ensure the sustainability of small-scale fisheries, which play a vital role in providing employment, food security, and nutrition in rapidly developing coastal regions.

6. Conclusions

This research investigated the effects of anthropogenic activities on small-scale fisheries, which play a crucial role in supporting the livelihoods of economically disadvantaged populations in the coastal regions of Nigeria. The study highlights threats posed by pollution, extensive habitat loss, and degradation due to rapid urbanisation and industrialisation over the past few decades in Ibeju-Lekki, leading to the depletion of mangrove ecosystems, which are crucial breeding grounds for fish like S. maderensis. The findings underscore the urgent need for inclusive fisheries management and sustainable coastal development strategies to safeguard these vital ecosystems and dependent fishing communities to foster the resilience and conservation of the S. maderensis fish species. High levels of hydrocarbon pollution and heavy metals from industrial effluents create a toxic marine environment detrimental to the productivity and survival of small pelagic species like S. maderensis. The significant decline in fish abundance over the past two decades, coupled with the fishers’ perceptions, indicates the adverse impact of habitat loss through land use change, overfishing, lack of needed amenities, and the need for economic opportunities for fishing communities that support local livelihoods and food security.
This study contributes to the growing body of evidence calling for a sustainable and inclusive approach to coastal and marine resource management, especially in the Global South and the need for MSP, stricter pollution control, habitat restoration, and biodiversity conservation. The study combines qualitative and quantitative approaches with ecosystems-based management strategies to understand the multifaceted impacts of anthropogenic activities on small-scale fisheries. Also, the study addresses the existing data gap respecting S. maderensis fisheries in the coastal regions of Nigeria, which have been previously identified by the FAO [44], thereby giving critical insights into the pros and cons of sustainable fisheries management in similar contexts. Applying genetic and morphological techniques to identify the Sardinella spp. species exploited in the region enhanced the accuracy of our research findings. It also provided a better scientific understanding of the current status of the Sardinella spp. stock in Ibeju-Lekki coastal waters. In addition, the research methods and findings provide a foundation for future studies in the fisheries sustainability domain, where incorporating scientific evidence and the LEK of fishing communities into ecosystems-based management strategies can contribute to small-scale fisheries in the coastal region, thereby attaining SDG 14.
Future investigations should broaden the spatial and temporal scope by employing ecosystem modes to unearth the complexities regarding small-scale fisheries dynamics and anthropogenic impacts for more insights into strategies for mitigation and adaptation. We suggest an inclusive multi-stakeholder approach to fisheries management involving the state, fishing communities, non-governmental organisations, and the private sector. Policies should prioritise the protection of habitat and marine resources, pollution control, regulation of fishing efforts, amenities provision, market development, and economic incentives for fishing communities. This research has shed light on anthropogenic impacts affecting small-scale S. maderensis fisheries in the coastal area of Nigeria. Implementing the recommendations will require concerted efforts that align with SDG 14. Incorporating empirical evidence and local ecological knowledge into the ecosystems-based management of fisheries will birth resilient small-scale S. maderensis fisheries supporting sustainable livelihoods, nutritional well-being, and biodiversity conservation in rapidly developing coastal areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, T.A.; methodology, T.A.; software, T.A. and S.D.; validation, D.A., I.O. and O.S.; formal analysis, T.A. and S.D.; investigation, T.A.; resources, D.A., I.O. and O.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.A.; writing—review and editing, T.A. and S.D.; supervision, D.A., I.O. and O.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and APC were funded by the Africa Centre of Excellence in Coastal Resilience (ACECoR), University of Cape Coast, with support from the World Bank and the Government of Ghana. The World Bank ACE grant number is credit number 6389-G.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was reviewed a reviewed as part of the first author’s PhD thesis nd approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Cape Coast, with the reference number UCCIRB/CANS/2020/09, and the Health Research Ethics Committee of the College of Medicine of the University of Lagos (HRECMUL), Lagos, Nigeria, with the reference number CMUL/HREC/10/20/784.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this research are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the World Bank Africa Centre of Excellence in Coastal Resilience (ACECoR); the University of Cape Coast, Ghana; the Association of African Universities; and the Government of Ghana for funding this research and the Ibeju-Lekki fishers in the study area who voluntarily took part in the survey interviews.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Blasiak, R.; Wabnitz, C.C.C. Aligning Fisheries Aid with International Development Targets and Goals. Mar. Policy 2018, 88, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. FAO. World Fisheries and Aquaculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022; ISBN 9789251072257. [Google Scholar]
  3. Olaoye, O.J.; Ojebiyi, W.G. Marine Fisheries in Nigeria: A Review. In Marine Ecology—Biotic and Abiotic Interactions; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 155–173. [Google Scholar]
  4. FAO. FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture: Fishery and Aquaculture Profiles—The Federal Republic of Nigeria; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. Adeosun, A. Draft of Socio-Economic/SIA Baseline Report for the Proposed Pipeline Route for The Dangote Fertilizer Plant Project; Ibeju-Lekki Local Government Area of Lagos State: Lagos, Nigeria, 2017.
  6. Anetekhai, M.A.; Whenu, O.O.; Osodein, O.A.; Fasasi, A.O. Beach Seine Fisheries in Badagry, Lagos State, South West, Nigeria. Braz. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 5, 815–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jim-Saiki, L.O.; Aihaji, T.A.; Giwa, J.E.; Oyerinde, M.; Adedeji, A.K. Factors Constraining Artisanal Fish Production in the Fishing Communities of Ibeju-Lekki Local Government Area of Lagos State Abstract. Int. J. Innov. Res. Dev. 2014, 3, 97–101. [Google Scholar]
  8. Omenai, J.; Ayodele, D. The Vulnerability of Eti-Osa and Ibeju-Lekki Coastal Communities in Lagos State Nigeria to Climate Change Hazards. Res. Hum. Soc. Sci. 2014, 4, 132–143. [Google Scholar]
  9. Whitehead, P.J.P. FAO Species Catalogue. Vol. 7. Clupeoid Fishes of the World (Suborder Clupeoidei). An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of the Herrings, Sardines, Pilchards, Sprats, Shads, Anchovies and Wolf-Herrings. FAO Fish. Synop. 1985, 125, 1–303. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAO. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics 2017; Food and Agriculture Organisation: Rome, Italy, 2019; ISBN 9789251316696. [Google Scholar]
  11. Solarin, B.; Kusemiju, K.; Akande, G. Species Composition and Abundance of Finfish and Shellfish Resources of the Coastal and Brackish Water Areas of Nigeria; Ibeju-Lekki Local Government: Lagos, Nigeria, 2008.
  12. Tous, P.; Sidibe, A.; Mbye, E.; De Morais, L.; Camara, K.; Munroe, T.; Adeofe, T.; Camara, Y.H.; Djiman, R.; Sagna, A.; et al.  Sardinella maderensis. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Adeleke, M.L.; Al-Kenawy, D.; Nasr-Allah, A.M.; Murphy, S.; El-Naggar, G.O.; Dickson, M. Fish Farmers’ Perceptions, Impacts and Adaptation on/of/to Climate Change in Africa (the Case of Egypt and Nigeria). In Theory and Practice of Climate Adaptation; Alves, F., Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Eds.; Springer: Cairo, Egypt, 2018; pp. 269–295. ISBN 9783319728742. [Google Scholar]
  14. Akintola, S.L.; Fakoya, K.A. Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Traditional Post-Harvest Practice and the Quest for Food and Nutritional Security in Nigeria. Agric. Food Secur. 2017, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Akiode, O.S.; Falayi, E.O.; Amoo, I.A. Anthropogenic-Induced Changes in Vegetation Trends in Lekki Conservation Centre Wetland Area, Lagos State Nigeria. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ. 2011, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  16. Adeshokan, O. “What Will Be Left of Us?” Lagos Fishermen Lament the Oil Refinery. Guardian 2019, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones, D.L.; Rowe, E.C. Land Reclamation and Remediation, Principles and Practice. Ref. Modul. Life Sci. Encycl. Appl. Plant Sci. 2017, 3, 304–310. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bali, A.S.; Sidhu, G.P.; Kumar, V. Chapter 29—Plant Enzymes in Metabolism of Organic Pollutants. In Handbook of Bioremediation: Physiological, Molecular and Biotechnological Interventions; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 465–474. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hiralal, S.; Sagar, A.; Ashish, B.; Akanksha, J. Targeted Genetic Modification Technologies: Potential Benefits of Their Future Use in Phytoremediation. In Phytoremediation: Biotechnological Strategies for Promoting Invigorating Environs; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 203–226. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chikelu, G.C. Regulating IUU Fishing in Nigeria: A Step towards Discovering the Untapped Potentials of Fisheries in Nigeria. Master’s Thesis, World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abiodun, S. Illegal Fishing (IUU) Activities in Nigeria Territorial Waters and Its Economic Impacts. Int. J. Res. Publ. Rev. 2021, 2, 728–735. [Google Scholar]
  22. Oluwatobi, A.O.J. Impacts of Climate Change on the Coastal Areas of Nigeria. J. Geogr. Reg. Plan. 2017, 10, 533–541. [Google Scholar]
  23. Udoh, J.P.; Ukpong, I.G. An Assessment of Anthropogenic Drivers of Ecosystem Change in the Calabar River Catchment, Cross River State, Nigeria. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2013, 15, 885–903. [Google Scholar]
  24. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture—Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals; Food and Agriculture Organisation: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jouffray, J.; Blasiak, R.; Norstrom, A.; Osterblom, H.; Nystrom, M. The Blue Acceleration: The Trajectory of Human Expansion into the Ocean. One Earth 2020, 2, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chuenpagdee, R.; Salas, S.; Barragán-Paladines, M.J. Big Questions About Sustainability and Viability in Small-Scale Fisheries. In Viability and Sustainability of Small-Scale Fisheries in Latin America and The Caribbean; Salas, S., Barragán-Paladines, M.J., Chuenpagdee, R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cisneros-Montemayor, A.M.; Sanjurjo, E.; Munro, G.R.; Hernández-Trejo, V.; Rashid Sumaila, U. Strategies and Rationale for Fishery Subsidy Reform. Mar. Policy 2016, 69, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Halpern, B.S.; Walbridge, S.; Selkoe, K.A.; Kappel, C.V.; Micheli, F.; D’Agrosa, C.; Bruno, J.F.; Casey, K.S.; Ebert, C.; Fox, H.E.; et al. A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems. Science 2008, 319, 948–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zamora-Ledezma, C.; Negrete-Bolagay, D.; Figueroa, F.; Zamora-Ledezma, E.; Ni, M.; Alexis, F.; Guerrero, V.H. Heavy Metal Water Pollution: A Fresh Look about Hazards, Novel and Conventional Remediation Methods. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Belhabib, D.; Sumaila, U.R.; Pauly, D. Feeding the Poor: Contribution of West African Fisheries Toemployment and Food Security. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2015, 111, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheung, W.W.L.; Watson, R.; Pauly, D. Signature of Ocean Warming in Global Fisheries Catch. Nature 2013, 497, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lotze, H.K.; Tittensor, D.P.; Bryndum-Buchholz, A.; Eddy, T.D.; Cheung, W.W.L.; Galbraith, E.D.; Barange, M.; Barrier, N.; Bianchi, D.; Blanchard, J.L.; et al. Global Ensemble Projections Reveal Trophic Amplification of Ocean Biomass Declines with Climate Change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 12907–12912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mendelssohn, R.; Philippe, C. Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of a Coastal Pelagic Species, Sardinella Maderensis off the Ivory Coast. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1989, 46, 1686–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gabche, C.E.; Hockey, H.U.P. Growth, Mortality and Reproduction of Sardinella Maderensis (Lowe, 1841) in the Artisanal Fisheries off Kribi, Cameroon. Fish. Res. 1995, 24, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sossoukpe, E.; Djidohokpin, G.; Fiogbe, E.D. Demographic Parameters and Exploitation Rate of Sardinella Maderensis (Pisces: Lowe 1838) in the Nearshore Waters of Benin (West Africa) and Their Implication for Management and Conservation. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2016, 4, 165–171. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wehye, A.S.; Amponsah, S.K.K.; Jueseah, A.S. Growth, Mortality and Exploitation of Sardinella Maderensis (Lowe, 1838) in the Liberian Coastal Waters. Fish. Aquac. J. 2017, 8, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Amponsah, S.K.K.; Ofori-Danson, P.K.; Nunoo, F.K.E.; Ameyaw, G.A. Estimates of Population Parameters for Sardinella Maderensis (Lowe, 1838) in the Coastal Waters of Ghana. Greener J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 9, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pauly, D.; Christensen, V.V.; Dalsgaard, J.; Froese, R.; Torres, F.J. Fishing down Marine Food Webs. Science 1998, 279, 860–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Worm, B.; Hilborn, R.; Baum, J.K.; Branch, T.A.; Collie, J.S.; Costello, C.; Fogarty, M.J.; Fulton, E.A.; Hutchings, J.A.; Jennings, S.; et al. Rebuilding Global Fisheries. Science 2009, 325, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roberts, C.M.; McClean, C.J.; Veron, J.E.N.; Hawkins, J.P.; Allen, G.R.; McAllister, D.E.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Schueler, F.W.; Spalding, M.; Wells, F.; et al. Marine Biodiversity Hotspots and Conservation Priorities for Tropical Reefs. Science 2002, 295, 1280–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Begg, G.A.; Friedland, K.D.; Pearce, J.B. Stock Identification and Its Role in Stock Assessment and Fisheries Management: An Overview. Fish. Res. 1999, 43, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zemlak, T.S.; Ward, R.D.; Connell, A.D.; Holmes, B.H.; Hebert, P.D.N. DNA Barcoding Reveals Overlooked Marine Fishes. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 9, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fujita, R. The Assessment and Management of Data Limited Fisheries: Future Directions. Mar. Policy 2021, 133, 104730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. FAO. Report of the FAO/CECAF Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish; CECAF/ECAF SERIES; FAO: Accra, Ghana, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  45. Iyalomhe, F.; Rizzi, J.; Torresan, S.; Gallina, V.; Critto, A.; Marcomini, A. Inventory of GIS-Based Decision Support Systems Addressing Climate Change Impacts on Coastal Waters and Related Inland Watersheds. In Climate Change—Realities, Impacts Over Ice Cap, Sea Level and Risks; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Balde, B.S.; Sow, F.N.; Ba, K.; Ekau, W.; Kantoussan, J.; Fall, M.; Diouf, M. Variability of Key Biological Parameters of Round Sardinella Sardinella Aurita and the Effects of Environmental Changes To Cite This Version: HAL Id: Hal-02749018 Archimer Variability of Key Biological Parameters of Round Sardinella Sardinella Aurita An. J. Fish Biol. 2020, 94, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ayodele, O.S.; Adelodun, A.A.; Oluwagbohunmi, A. Trace Metal Concentration in Common Fishes from the Lagos Lagoon, Southwestern Nigeria. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2023, 60, 102844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Iyiola, A.O.; Akinrinade, A.J.; Ajayi, F.O. Effects of Water Pollution on Biodiversity Along the Coastal Regions. In Biodiversity in Africa: Potentials, Threats and Conservation; Chibueze Izah, S., Ed.; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2022; pp. 345–367. ISBN 978-981-19-3326-4. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jinadu, O.O. Small-Scale Fisheries In Lagos State, Nigeria: Economic Sustainable Yield Determination. In Microbehavior and Macroresults, Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute ofFisheries Economics and Trade, Corvallis, OR, USA, 10–14 July 2000; InternationalInstitute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET): Corvallis, OR, USA, 2000; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  50. Dekolo, S.; Oduwaye, A. Managing the Lagos Megacity and Its Geospacial Imperative. In Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Munich, Germany, 5–7 October 2011; Volume XXXVIII, pp. 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hennink, M.; Kaiser, B.; Weber, M. What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research. Qual. Health Res. 2019, 29, 1483–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Froese, R.; Pauly, D. FishBase, Worldwide Electronic Publication; ScienceOpen: Lexington, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  53. FAO. Food and Agricultural Organization. Field Guide to Commercial Marine Resources of the Gulf of Guinea; FAO/Unnited Nations: Rome, Italy, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ward, R.D.; Zemlak, T.S.; Innes, B.H.; Last, P.R.; Hebert, P.D.N. DNA Barcoding Australia’s Fish Species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360, 1847–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ivanova, N.V.; Zemlak, T.S.; Hanner, R.H.; Hebert, P.D.N. Universal Primer Cocktails for Fish DNA Barcoding. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007, 7, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, M.S.; Kim, J.; Kang, T.W.; Jeong, U.; Kim, K.R.; Bang, I.C. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Sardinella Zunasi (Clupeiformes: Clupeidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B Resour. 2021, 6, 1178–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Takyi, E. Population Genetic Structure of Sardinella Aurita and Sardinella Madurensis in the Eastern Central Atlantic Region (Cecaf) in West Africa. Master’s Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jensen, J.R. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective; Prentice-Hall Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  59. APHA (American Public Health Association—Apha). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; APHA: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  60. UNEP/IOC Guidelines on Survey and Monitoring of Marine Litter; UNEP: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
  61. Arizi, E.K.; Collie, J.S.; Castro, K.; Humphries, A.T. Fishing Characteristics and Catch Composition of the Sardinella Fishery in Ghana Indicate Urgent Management Is Needed. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2022, 52, 102348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Stobart, B.; Alvarez-Barastegui, D.; Goñi, R. Effect of Habitat Patchiness on the Catch Rates of a Mediterranean Coastal Bottom Long-Line Fishery. Fish. Res. 2012, 129–130, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Thompson, W.L.; White, G.C.; Gowan, C. Fish. In Monitoring Vertebrate Populations; Thompson, W.L., White, G.C., Gowan, C.B.T.-M.V.P., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1998; pp. 191–232. ISBN 978-0-12-688960-4. [Google Scholar]
  64. Harley, S.J.; Ransom, A.M.; Alistair, D. Is Catch-per-Unit-Effort Proportional to Abundance. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2001, 58, 1760–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. McGoodwin, J.R. Understanding the Cultures of Fishing Communities: A Key to Fisheries Management and Food Security; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  66. Farr, E.R.; Stoll, J.S.; Beitl, C.M. Effects of Fisheries Management on Local Ecological Knowledge. Ecol. Soc. 2018, 23, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Berkström, C.; Papadopoulos, M.; Jiddawi, N.S.; Nordlund, L.M. Fishers’ Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) on Connectivity and Seascape Management. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 00130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. de Morais Cardoso da Silva, L.; Machado, I.C.; dos Santos Tutui, S.L.; Tomás, A.R.G. Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) Concerning Snook Fishers on Estuarine Waters: Insights into Scientific Knowledge and Fisheries Management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 186, 105088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Garmendia, V.; Subida, M.D.; Aguilar, A.; Fernández, M. The Use of Fishers’ Knowledge to Assess Benthic Resource Abundance across Management Regimes in Chilean Artisanal Fisheries. Mar. Policy 2021, 127, 104425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Boubekri, I.; Mazurek, H.; Djebar, A.B.; Amara, R. Social-Ecological Dimensions of Marine Protected Areas and Coastal Fishing: How Fishermen’s Local Ecological Knowledge Can Inform Fisheries Management at the Future “Taza” MPA (Algeria, SW Mediterranean). Ocean Coast. Manag. 2022, 221, 106121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Silas, M.O.; Semba, M.L.; Mgeleka, S.S.; Van Well, L.; Linderholm, H.W.; Gullström, M. Using Fishers’ Local Ecological Knowledge for Management of Small-Scale Fisheries in Data-Poor Regions: Comparing Seasonal Interview and Field Observation Records in East Africa. Fish. Res. 2023, 264, 106721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gourène, G.; Teugels, G.G. Clupeidae. In The fresh and Brackish Water Fishes of West Africa; Paugy, D., Lévêque, C., Teugels, G., Eds.; Coll. faune et flore tropicales 40; Institut de Recherche de Développement, Muséum National D’histoire Naturelle, Paris, France and Musée Royal de l’Afrique Central, Tervuren, Belgium: Paris, France, 2003; pp. 125–142. [Google Scholar]
  73. Fischer, W.; Bianchi, G.; Scott, W.B. (Eds.) FAO Species Identification Sheets for Fishery Purposes. Eastern Central Atlantic; Fishing Areas 34, 47 (in Part); Canada Funds-in-Trust: Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, by Arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1981; Volumes 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ngah, A.S.; Braide, S.; Dike, C.C. Physico-Chemistry of Elechi Creek in the Upper Bonny Estuary, Rivers State, Nigeria. J. Geosci. Environ. Prot. 2017, 5, 181–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. FAO. Major Exploited Fish Species. In Marine FIishery Resources of Nigeria: A Review of Exploited Fish Stocks; Food and Agriculture Organisation: Rome, Italy, 2021; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  76. USEPA. United States Office of Water Environmental Protection Regulations and Standards Agency Criteria and Standards Division. Water Ambient Water Quality Criteria for EPA 440/5-84-027 Lead—1984; USEPA: Wahington, DC, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  77. FEPA. Guidelines and Standards for Environmental Pollution Control in Nigeria; Federal Environmental Projection Agency: Abuja, Nigeria, 2003.
  78. USEPA. Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories, Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis, 3rd ed.; United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 823-B-00-007, Office of Water (4305): Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  79. Hynes, H.B.N. The Biology of Polluted Waters; Liverpool University Press: Liverpool, UK, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  80. Camargo, J.A.; Alonso, A.; Salamanca, A. Nitrate Toxicity to Aquatic Animals: A Review with New Data for Freshwater Invertebrates. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 1255–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed.; American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA; American Water Works Association (AWWA): Washington, DC, USA; Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF): Washington, DC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  82. Antoine, D.; Andre, J.M.; More, A. Oceanic Primary Production 2. Estimation of Global Scale from Satellite (Coastal Zone Color Scanner) Chlorophyll. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1996, 10, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. USEPA. Fact Sheet: Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria Update for Cadmium EPA-822-F-16-003; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; Volume 304.
  84. USEPA. Water Quality Standards Criteria Summaries: A Compilation of State/Federal Criteria-Iron; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1988.
  85. USEPA. United States. Environmental Protection Agency 1995 Full View More Editions PB95-187266REB PC A22/MF A04 Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System: Supplementary Information… Zinc, Selenium, Nickel, Mercury (Metal) Great Lak; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
  86. USEPA. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chromium; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1980.
  87. Myers, R.A.; Worm, B. Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities. Nature 2003, 423, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hutchings, J.A. Collapse and Recovery of Marine Fishes. Nature 2000, 406, 882–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sheaves, M.; Brookes, J.D.; Coles, R.; Freckelton, M.L.; Groves, P.; Johnston, R.D.; Winberg, P.C. Repair and Revitalisation of Australia’s Tropical Estuaries and Coastal Wetlands: Opportunities and Constraints for the Reinstatement of Lost Function and Productivity. Mar. Policy 2014, 47, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Waltham, N.J.; Sheaves, M. Expanding Coastal Urban and Industrial Seascape in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: Critical Need for Coordinated Planning and Policy. Mar. Policy 2015, 57, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. de Mitcheson, Y.S.; Linardich, C.; Barreiros, J.P.; Ralph, G.M.; Aguilar-Perera, A.; Afonso, P.; Erisman, B.E.; Pollard, D.A.; Fennessy, S.T.; Bertoncini, Á.A.; et al. Valuable but Vulnerable: Over-Fishing and under-Management Continue to Threaten Groupers so What Now? Mar. Policy 2020, 116, 103909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Neumann, B.; Ott, K.; Kenchington, R. Strong Sustainability in Coastal Areas: A Conceptual Interpretation of SDG 14. Sustain. Sci. 2017, 12, 1019–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Donkor, F.K.; Mearns, K. Conserving Coastal and Marine Areas for Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Constraints. In Life Below Water; Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 230–241. ISBN 978-3-319-98536-7. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ayyam, V.; Palanivel, S.; Chandrakasan, S. Balancing Development and Environmental Impact in the Coastal Regions. In Coastal Ecosystems of the Tropics—Adaptive Management; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 579–595. ISBN 978-981-13-8926-9. [Google Scholar]
  95. Wei, C.; Padgham, M.; Barona, P.C.; Blaschke, T. Scale-Free Relationships between Social and Landscape Factors in Urban Systems. Sustainability 2017, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ma, J.; Wu, Z.; Guo, M.; Hu, Q. Dynamic Relationship between Marine Fisheries Economic Development, Environmental Protection and Fisheries Technological Progress—A Case of Coastal Provinces in China. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2024, 247, 106885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bi, M.; Wei, G.; Zhang, Z. The Impact of Economics and Urbanization on Marine Fisheries Sustainability in Atlantic Coastal Africa. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2023, 239, 106596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Murshed-E-Jahan, K.; Pemsl, D. The Impact of Integrated Aquaculture-Agriculture on Small-Scale Farm Sustainability and Farmers’ Livelihoods: Experience from Bangladesh. Agric. Syst. 2011, 104, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sievanen, L. How Do Small-Scale Fishers Adapt to Environmental Variability? Lessons from Baja California, Sur, Mexico. Marit. Stud. 2014, 13, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Andrews, N.; Bennett, N.J.; Le Billon, P.; Green, S.J.; Cisneros-Montemayor, A.M.; Amongin, S.; Gray, N.J.; Sumaila, U.R. Oil, Fisheries and Coastal Communities: A Review of Impacts on the Environment, Livelihoods, Space and Governance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 75, 102009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nordlund, L.M.; Unsworth, R.K.F.; Gullström, M.; Cullen-Unsworth, L.C. Global Significance of Seagrass Fishery Activity. Fish Fish. 2018, 19, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Unsworth, R.K.F.; Nordlund, L.M.; Cullen-Unsworth, L.C. Seagrass Meadows Support Global Fisheries Production. Conserv. Lett. 2019, 12, e12566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Huang, J.; Huang, L.; Wu, Z.; Mo, Y.; Zou, Q.; Wu, N.; Chen, Z. Correlation of Fish Assemblages with Habitat and Environmental Variables in a Headwater Stream Section of Lijiang River, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yan, H.F.; Kyne, P.M.; Jabado, R.W.; Leeney, R.H.; Davidson, L.N.K.; Derrick, D.H.; Finucci, B.; Freckleton, R.P.; Fordham, S.V.; Dulvy, N.K. Overfishing and Habitat Loss Drive Range Contraction of Iconic Marine Fishes to near Extinction. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabb6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. van der Lee, A.S.; Koops, M.A. Are Small Fishes More Sensitive to Habitat Loss? A Generic Size-Based Model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2016, 73, 716–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Meulenbroek, P.; Stranzl, S.; Oueda, A.; Sendzimir, J.; Mano, K.; Kabore, I.; Ouedraogo, R.; Melcher, A. Fish Communities, Habitat Use, and Human Pressures in the Upper Volta Basin, Burkina Faso, West Africa. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Shahidul Islam, M.; Tanaka, M. Impacts of Pollution on Coastal and Marine Ecosystems Including Coastal and Marine Fisheries and Approach for Management: A Review and Synthesis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 48, 624–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Froese, R.; Pauly, D. Sardinella maderensis (Lowe, 1838). FishBase Publ. World Wide Web Electron. 2021, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  109. Mahboob, S.; Ahmed, Z.; Farooq Khan, M.; Virik, P.; Al-Mulhm, N.; Baabbad, A.A.A. Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution in Seawater and Sediments in the Arabian Gulf, near Dammam, Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ.—Sci. 2022, 34, 101677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Abdellaoui, B.; Berraho, A.; Falcini, F.; Santoleri, J.R.; Sammartino, M.; Pisano, A.; Mh, I.; Hilm, K. Assessing the Impact of Temperature and Chlorophyll Variations on the Fluctuations of Sardine Abundance in Al-Hoceima (South Alboran Sea). J. Mar. Sci. Res. Dev. 2017, 7, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Dutkiewicz, S.; Hickman, A.E.; Jahn, O.; Henson, S.; Beaulieu, C.; Monier, E. Ocean Colour Signature of Climate Change. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Fingas, M. Remote Sensing for Marine Management, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; ISBN 9780128050521. [Google Scholar]
  113. Alharbi, T.; El-Sorogy, A. Assessment of Metal Contamination in Coastal Sediments of Al-Khobar Area, Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2017, 129, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mansour, A.; Nawar, A.; Madkour, H. Metal Pollution in Marine Sediments of Selected Harbours and Industrial Areas along the Red Sea Coast of Egypt. Ann. Naturhist Mus. Wien Ser. 2011, A113, 225–244. [Google Scholar]
  115. Daniel, I.; Nna, P. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Concentration in Surface Water of Cross River Estuary, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Asian J. Environ. Ecol. 2016, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Solomon, S.G.; Ayuba, V.O.; Tahir, M.A.; Okomoda, V.T. Catch per Unit Effort and Some Water Quality Parameters of Lake Kalgwai Jigawa State, Nigeria. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Pauly, D.; Zeller, D. Catch Reconstructions Reveal That Global Marine Fisheries Catches Are Higher than Reported and Declining. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Liu, H.; Brosse, S.; Qu, X.; Xia, W.; Li, X.; Chen, Y. Land Use Outweighs Other Stressors in Declining Fish Biodiversity in Lakes of Eastern China during the 1980s-2010s. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 152, 110390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Giacomazzo, M.; Bertolo, A.; Brodeur, P.; Massicotte, P.; Goyette, J.-O.; Magnan, P. Linking Fisheries to Land Use: How Anthropogenic Inputs from the Watershed Shape Fish Habitat Quality. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 135377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Warren, C.; Steenbergen, D.J. Fisheries Decline, Local Livelihoods and Conflicted Governance: An Indonesian Case. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2021, 202, 105498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Standal, D.; Hersoug, B. Illegal Fishing: A Challenge to Fisheries Management in Norway. Mar. Policy 2023, 155, 105750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Macusi, E.D.; Liguez, C.G.O.; Macusi, E.S.; Liguez, A.K.O.; Digal, L.N. Factors That Influence Small-Scale Fishers’ Readiness to Exit a Declining Fishery in Davao Gulf, Philippines. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2022, 230, 106378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Duque, G.; Gamboa-García, D.E.; Molina, A.; Cogua, P. Effect of Water Quality Variation on Fish Assemblages in an Anthropogenically Impacted Tropical Estuary, Colombian Pacific. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 25740–25753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pereira, D.V.; Arantes, C.C.; Sousa, K.N.S.; de Freitas, C.E. Relationships between Fishery Catch Rates and Land Cover along a Longitudinal Gradient in Floodplains of the Amazon River. Fish. Res. 2023, 258, 106521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Parker, D.C.; Berger, T.; Manson, S.M.; Mcconnell, W.J.; Brown, D.G.; Goodchild, M.F.; Gotts, N.M.; Gumerman, G.J.; Hoffmann, M.J.; Huigen, M.G.; et al. Agent-Based Models Of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change. In Proceedings of the International Workshop, Irvine, CA, USA, 4–7 October 2001; Volume 145. [Google Scholar]
  126. Chapman, P.M. Assessing and Managing Stressors in a Changing Marine Environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 124, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Makwinja, R.; Mengistou, S.; Kaunda, E.; Alemiew, T.; Phiri, T.B.; Kosamu, I.B.M.; Kaonga, C.C. Modeling of Lake Malombe Annual Fish Landings and Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE). Forecasting 2021, 3, 39–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kao, Y.-C.; Rogers, M.W.; Bunnell, D.B.; Cowx, I.G.; Qian, S.S.; Anneville, O.; Beard, T.D.; Brinker, A.; Britton, J.R.; Chura-Cruz, R.; et al. Effects of Climate and Land-Use Changes on Fish Catches across Lakes at a Global Scale. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Bene, C. Small-Scale Fisheries: Assessing Their Contribution to Rural Livelihoods in Developing Countries; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  130. Béné, C.; Friend, R.M. Poverty in Small-Scale Fisheries: Old Issue, New Analysis. Prog. Dev. Stud. 2011, 11, 119–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bavinck, M.; Jentoft, S.; Scholtens, J. Fisheries as Social Struggle: A Reinvigorated Social Science Research Agenda. Mar. Policy 2018, 94, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Purcell, S.W.; Pomeroy, R.S. Driving Small-Scale Fisheries in Developing Countries. Front. Mar. Sci. 2015, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Patrick, W.S.; Link, J.S. Myths That Continue to Impede Progress in Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management. Fisheries 2015, 40, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Pikitch, E.K.; Santora, C.; Babcock, E.A.; Bakun, A.; Bonfil, R.; Conover, D.O.; Dayton, P.; Doukakis, P.; Fluharty, D.; Heneman, B.; et al. Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management. Science 2004, 305, 346–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Gelcich, S.; Hughes, T.P.; Olsson, P.; Folke, C.; Defeo, O.; Fernández, M.; Foale, S.; Gunderson, L.H.; Rodríguez-Sickert, C.; Scheffer, M.; et al. Navigating Transformations in Governance of Chilean Marine Coastal Resources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16794–16799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Jentoft, S.; Chuenpagdee, R. Assessing Governability of Small-Scale Fisheries. In Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries: Global Reflections; Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 17–35. ISBN 978-3-319-17034-3. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The geographical setting of the study area: (a) map of Africa showing Nigeria; (b) map of Nigeria showing Lagos State; (c) map of Lagos State showing Ibeju-Lekki.
Figure 1. The geographical setting of the study area: (a) map of Africa showing Nigeria; (b) map of Nigeria showing Lagos State; (c) map of Lagos State showing Ibeju-Lekki.
Sustainability 16 02848 g001
Figure 2. Map Ibeju-Lekki showing S. maderensis fishing communities and sampling stations.
Figure 2. Map Ibeju-Lekki showing S. maderensis fishing communities and sampling stations.
Sustainability 16 02848 g002
Figure 3. The 1984 false-colour RGB composites of Ibeju-Lekki (AOI in rectangle).
Figure 3. The 1984 false-colour RGB composites of Ibeju-Lekki (AOI in rectangle).
Sustainability 16 02848 g003
Figure 4. S. maderensis specimen.
Figure 4. S. maderensis specimen.
Sustainability 16 02848 g004
Figure 5. The land-use/land-cover change maps of the study area for 1984, 2002, and 2020: (a) 1984 land-use/land-cover classification map; (b) 2002 land-use/land-cover classification map; (c) 2020 land-use/land-cover classification map.
Figure 5. The land-use/land-cover change maps of the study area for 1984, 2002, and 2020: (a) 1984 land-use/land-cover classification map; (b) 2002 land-use/land-cover classification map; (c) 2020 land-use/land-cover classification map.
Sustainability 16 02848 g005
Figure 6. Trend analysis of S. maderensis abundance.
Figure 6. Trend analysis of S. maderensis abundance.
Sustainability 16 02848 g006
Figure 7. Reasons for the decrease in the catches of S. maderensis.
Figure 7. Reasons for the decrease in the catches of S. maderensis.
Sustainability 16 02848 g007
Figure 8. Anthropogenic factors (urban land use) affecting Sardinella spp. fisheries in Ibeju-Lekki.
Figure 8. Anthropogenic factors (urban land use) affecting Sardinella spp. fisheries in Ibeju-Lekki.
Sustainability 16 02848 g008
Table 1. List of fishing communities, S. maderensis fisher populations, and sample sizes.
Table 1. List of fishing communities, S. maderensis fisher populations, and sample sizes.
OIDName of CommunityX_CoordY_CoordNo. of FishersRespondents
1Mopo Onibeju570649.904710203.215267
2Mosirikogo576039.373710332.186202
3Iwerekun580971.087710695.66225
4Igando Orudu588118.119711854.276204
5Debojo/Idado590680.321712122.65102
6Badore/Eleko592815.844711999.13161
7Magbon Alade598409.745711667.94229052
8Orimedu600708.216711570.32831557
9Orofun602640.31711634.803409
10Akodo603698.202711494.40418534
11Tiye605610.807711111.619326
12Imobido606933.329710870.107121
13Idaso609293.271710589.953406
14Idotun/Magbon Segun613545.895709805.322408
15Okunraye616821.825709262.975205
16Olomowewe617879.415709326.165306
17Origanrigan618917.048709206.33153
18Oshoroko620422.918708904.5152
19Lekki621501.646708601.792607
20Apakin624818.66707978.634407
21Ita-Marun625958.063707859.14410019
22Oriyanrin627240.777707333.3127415
23Otolu628868.325707255.648015
24Okegelu630435.325706974.5314014
25Lepia630924.571706528.2966013
26Ikegun631900.825706611.888204
27Folu632633.442706491.58320040
28OkunIse634138.993706413.7724210
29AkodoIse634932.844706212.301156
30Imedu636683.217705850.448100
Total 1879360
Table 2. Spatial data and sources.
Table 2. Spatial data and sources.
Acquisition DateSatellite Number Sensor TypeWRS Path/RowUTM Zone DatumSpatial Resolution (M)Source and Year
4 January 2020Landsat 8OLI_TIRS191/5531 NWGS8430USGS, 2020
28 December 2002Landsat 7ETM+191/5531 NWGS8430USGS, 2006
18 December 1984Landsat 5TM191/5531 NWGS8430USGS, 1984
Table 3. Variable description.
Table 3. Variable description.
Variable DescriptionValuesMeasurement
V49Hours of fishing trip{1–6 h, 7–12 h} …Ordinal
V53aMarket/individual consumers{No, Yes}Nominal
V53bMarket/companies{No, Yes}Nominal
V53cMarket/middle women{No, Yes}Nominal
V54Average weight/quantity of each catch{1–100 kg, 101–200 kg} …Nominal
V61aLand use effect/industrial dev.{No, Yes}Nominal
V61bLand use effect/residential dev.{No, Yes}Nominal
V61cLand use effect/recreational dev. {No, Yes}Nominal
V61dLand use effect/commercial dev.{No, Yes}Nominal
V61eLand use effect/transportation dev.{No, Yes}Nominal
V62aScale of effect/industrial dev.{None, Least effect} …Ordinal
V62bScale of effect/residential dev.{None, Least effect} …Ordinal
V62cScale of effect/recreational dev. {None, Least effect} …Ordinal
V62dScale of effect/commercial dev.{None, Least effect} …Ordinal
V62eScale of effect/transportation dev. {None, Least effect} …Ordinal
V67aNeeded amenities/good roads{Not needed, Least needed} …Ordinal
V67bNeeded amenities/hospitals{Not needed, Least needed} …Ordinal
V67cNeeded amenities/electricity{Not needed, Least needed} …Ordinal
V67dNeeded amenities/schools{Not needed, Least needed} …Ordinal
V67eNeeded amenities/telecom. facilities{Not needed, Least needed} …Ordinal
V67fNeeded amenities/pipe-borne water{Not needed, Least needed} …Ordinal
V67gNeeded amenities/financial incentives{Not needed, Least needed} …Ordinal
V67hNeeded amenities/extension services{Not needed, Least needed} …Ordinal
V61_LUEPerceived land use anthrop. effect{SUM: V61a, …, V61e}Scale
V62_LUSScale of land-use anthrop. effect{SUM: V62a, …, V62e}Scale
V_LANDUSEPerceived land use effects{PRODUCT: V61_LUE, V62_LUS}Scale
V_CATCHTRIPCatch per trip (kg){V54)Scale
V_FISH_EFFORTFishing effort (hours){V49}Scale
CPUECatch per unit effort (kg/h){V54/V49}Scale
V53_MKTAccess to market{SUM: V53a, V53b, V53c}Scale
V_AMENITYAmenities (needed){SUM: V67a, …, V67h}Scale
Table 4. Genetic species identification results.
Table 4. Genetic species identification results.
S/NName of SamplePercentage IDGenBank Accession No.BLAST Prediction
1.OR199.84MT272815.1S. maderensis
2.OR299.69MT272814.1S. maderensis
3.OR393.91MT272807.1S. maderensis
4OR498.89AP009143.1S. maderensis
5.OR599.21AP009143.1S. maderensis
6.OR699.01AP009143.1S. maderensis
7.LE189.38MT272815.1S. maderensis
8.LE2100.0MT272815.1S. maderensis
9.LE399.31MT272816.1S. maderensis
10.LE499.62MT272816.1S. maderensis
11.LE599.83MT272811.1S. maderensis
12.LE699.83MT272816.1S. maderensis
Table 5. Land-use change statistics (1984–2020).
Table 5. Land-use change statistics (1984–2020).
Categories1984
(Sq. Km)
%2002
(Sq. Km)
%2020
(Sq. Km)
%1984–2020 Change (Sq. Km)Change %
Water Bodies268.37945.07268.74045.13267.04644.84−1.333−0.5
Forested Areas136.71322.96187.48131.48118.08919.83−18.624−13.62
Cultivated Lands102.22217.1635.2675.9238.9136.53−63.309−61.93
Minor Urban56.3559.4654.4829.1583.90314.0927.54948.88
Major Urban31.8685.3549.5688.3287.58514.7155.717174.84
Total595.538100595.538100595.538100
Table 6. Water quality analysis results for Ibeju-Lekki coastal water.
Table 6. Water quality analysis results for Ibeju-Lekki coastal water.
Physicochemical ParametersMinMaxMeanPermissible LimitsRemark
Water Temp. (°C)232725.3924 °C [75]Within required range
pH7.328.067.886.5–8.5 [76]; 9.0 [77]Within required range
Salinity (ppt)24.8632.1729.37Tolerates low salinities [9,12]Within required range
TDS (mg/L)11,50030,00024,971.12000 mg/L [77]Higher than acceptable level
DO (mg/L)4.815.87.974.8 mg/L [78]Within acceptable limit
BOD (mg/L)0.4113.373–6 mg/L—tolerable; 8 mg/L—lethal [79]Within range/sometimes above the lethal limit
NO3 (mg/L)0.012.110.3120 mg/L [77,80] 10 mg/L [78,81]Within acceptable limit
PO4 (mg/L)0.010.70.155 mg/L [77]Within acceptable limit
Chlorophyll-a (µg/L)00.040.010.1–8 µg/L [82]Not up to the required level
Table 7. Heavy metal concentrations in water at Ibeju-Lekki.
Table 7. Heavy metal concentrations in water at Ibeju-Lekki.
Heavy MetalsMinMaxMean
± SD
Permissible Limits
(USEPA)
Permissible Limits
(FEPA, 2003)
Remarks
Lead (Pb)0.000.930.20 ± 0.170.14 [76]<1.00Within acceptable limits nationally but above the international limit
Cadmium (Cd)0.000.200.06 ± 0.060.03 [83]<1.00
Iron (Fe)0.313.162.62 ± 0.511.00 [84]-
Manganese (Mn)0.070.380.19 ± 0.110.10 [84]5.00
Nickel (Ni)0.210.930.64 ± 0.190.07 [85]<1.00
Chromium (Cr)0.007.001.73 ± 2.090.18 [86]<1.00Above acceptable limits
Table 8. Linear regression of perceived anthropogenic predictors of S. maderensis abundance.
Table 8. Linear regression of perceived anthropogenic predictors of S. maderensis abundance.
VariableBSE95.00% CIβtp
(Intercept)140.9925.79[90.28, 191.71]0.005.47<0.001
V_FISH_EFFORT−7.450.64[−8.72, −6.18]−0.54−11.58<0.001
V_AMENITY−3.230.55[−4.32, −2.15]−0.27−5.85<0.001
V_LANDUSE−0.850.27[−1.39, −0.32]−0.15−3.160.002
V_MKT41.488.12[25.51, 57.45]0.225.11<0.001
Note. Results: F(4,355) = 58.14, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.40. Unstandardised regression equation: CPUE   = 140.99 7.45 × V _ FISH _ EFFORT   3.23 × V _ AMENITY   0.85 × V _ LANDUSE   + 41.48 × V 53 _ MKT .
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adewale, T.; Aheto, D.; Okyere, I.; Soyinka, O.; Dekolo, S. Effects of Anthropogenic Activities on Sardinella maderensis (Lowe, 1838) Fisheries in Coastal Communities of Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072848

AMA Style

Adewale T, Aheto D, Okyere I, Soyinka O, Dekolo S. Effects of Anthropogenic Activities on Sardinella maderensis (Lowe, 1838) Fisheries in Coastal Communities of Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria. Sustainability. 2024; 16(7):2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adewale, Temitope, Denis Aheto, Isaac Okyere, Olufemi Soyinka, and Samuel Dekolo. 2024. "Effects of Anthropogenic Activities on Sardinella maderensis (Lowe, 1838) Fisheries in Coastal Communities of Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria" Sustainability 16, no. 7: 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072848

APA Style

Adewale, T., Aheto, D., Okyere, I., Soyinka, O., & Dekolo, S. (2024). Effects of Anthropogenic Activities on Sardinella maderensis (Lowe, 1838) Fisheries in Coastal Communities of Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria. Sustainability, 16(7), 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop