Next Article in Journal
PVL-Cartographer: Panoramic Vision-Aided LiDAR Cartographer-Based SLAM for Maverick Mobile Mapping System
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Evaluation of High-Resolution Satellite Precipitation Products over the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau Using the New Ground Observation Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of 3D Laser Scanning Technology Using Laser Radar System to Error Analysis in the Curtain Wall Construction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Special Issue “Radar Techniques for Structures Characterization and Monitoring”

1
COMEGI, Faculty of Engineering and Technologies, University of Lusíada Norte, 4760-108 Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal
2
Advanced Infrastructure Design Inc., 1 Crossroads Drive, Hamilton, NJ 08691, USA
3
Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Parthenope”, 80143 Napoli, Italy
4
School of Mechanical Engineering and Electronic Information, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(13), 3382; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133382
Submission received: 8 May 2023 / Accepted: 26 June 2023 / Published: 3 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radar Techniques for Structures Characterization and Monitoring)
This Special Issue focuses on the potential of radar-based remote techniques for characterizing and monitoring natural and building structures. This collection concerns ground-penetrating radar (GPR) since it is one of the most versatile geophysical remote-sensing techniques that can be applied virtually in any built technique or material. But it also expands to include other techniques such as laser-based scanning and insight into new developments in the field of radar processing. Ten research papers were published in this Special Issue, comprising nine articles [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] and one technical note [10].
The first contribution examines the problem of rebar assessment in reinforced concrete structures with GPR. A common problem in some cases is the processing and interpretation of radargrams due to the complexity of the radar images, as the signal is reflected based on the dielectric constant of subsurface media/layers. To tackle this problem, Yue et al. [1] and Wang et al. [2] improved the detectability of rebars using various artificial neural network models to facilitate and automate signal detection, classification, and processing. The second contribution from Wang et al. [3] tackles the difficulty in assessing the thickness of concrete elements (in this case, a tunnel lining) when only one side is available, and the rebar prevents the detection of the opposite side due to the high dielectric constant of the metal media which is considered infinity. The study aims to identify the rebar signals to improve the assessment of the entire depth of the structural element.
GPR is also used in monitoring cracks in road pavements, as elucidated by Guo et al. [4]. Their study includes the use of numerical modeling to improve the characteristics of field data and enhance the data interpretation for a better understanding of radar images.
Two research papers from Zhang et al. [5] and Wang et al. [6] focus on the detection of water content and wet surfaces for use in agricultural settings. The authors of [5] use innovative data processing techniques to improve the assessment of water content in the soil. On the other hand, the authors of [6] show laboratory experiments and numerical simulations to show wet underground objects and surfaces produce a distinct signal within GPR data that allows for a better interpretation of the presence of water.
The paper from Gilmutdinov et al. [7] deals with the detection of wall-layered geometry with GPR. The authors use an innovative method paired with artificial neural network models to improve the accuracy of GPR measurements.
The studies from Zhang et al. [8] and Wang et al. [9] all deal with new developments and improvements in radar signals to reduce clutter and improve the interpretation of field data.
Finally, the paper from Wang et al. [10] illustrates a remote sensing technique using a 3D laser scanner to acquire building geometrical information and compare it with the original design drawings, update the design drawings, and obtain as-built measurements. The study considers the case of the installation of a curtain wall. As-built geometrical data were acquired and compared to design data and used to obtain correct measurements for the effective curtain wall.
In conclusion, the publications in this Special Issue highlight some of the novel developments and advances in the GPR field related to the automatization of data analyses, processing, and decluttering and other fields that can use remote-sensing techniques to provide important insights into the built (and natural) environments.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to all aspects of this editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The guest editors would like to thank all authors who contributed to this Special Issue for sharing their scientific findings. They would also like to thank the reviewers for their valuable work and comments to improve the quality of papers published within this Special Issue, the academic editors, and the Remote Sensing editorial team for all the support in the process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yue, Y.; Liu, H.; Meng, X.; Li, Y.; Du, Y. Generation of High-Precision Ground Penetrating Radar Images Using Improved Least Square Generative Adversarial Networks. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.; Qin, H.; Miao, F. A Multi-Path Encoder Network for GPR Data Inversion to Improve Defect Detection in Reinforced Concrete. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Y.; Qin, H.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yang, D.; Qu, C.; Geng, T. RCE-GAN: A Rebar Clutter Elimination Network to Improve Tunnel Lining Void Detection from GPR Images. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guo, S.; Xu, Z.; Li, X.; Zhu, P. Detection and Characterization of Cracks in Highway Pavement with the Amplitude Variation of GPR Diffracted Waves: Insights from Forward Modeling and Field Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Ling, T.; Fu, G.; Guo, Y. Experimental Research on Evaluation of Soil Water Content Using Ground Penetrating Radar and Wavelet Packet-Based Energy Analysis. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 5047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, R.; Yin, T.; Zhou, E.; Qi, B. What Indicative Information of a Subsurface Wetted Body Can Be Detected by a Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR)? A Laboratory Study and Numerical Simulation. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gilmutdinov, I.; Schlögel, I.; Hinterleitner, A.; Wonka, P.; Wimmer, M. Assessment of Material Layers in Building Walls Using GeoRadar. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Luo, T.; Huang, T.; Tang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Luo, D. Radar Signal Intrapulse Modulation Recognition Based on a Denoising-Guided Disentangled Network. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Zhu, S.; Lan, L.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Z. Range-Ambiguous Clutter Suppression via FDA MIMO Planar Array Radar with Compressed Sensing. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.; Yi, T.; Liang, X.; Ueda, T. Application of 3D Laser Scanning Technology Using Laser Radar System to Error Analysis in the Curtain Wall Construction. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandes, F.; Rasol, M.; Schirinzi, G.; Zhou, F. Editorial for the Special Issue “Radar Techniques for Structures Characterization and Monitoring”. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3382. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133382

AMA Style

Fernandes F, Rasol M, Schirinzi G, Zhou F. Editorial for the Special Issue “Radar Techniques for Structures Characterization and Monitoring”. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(13):3382. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandes, Francisco, Mezgeen Rasol, Gilda Schirinzi, and Feng Zhou. 2023. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Radar Techniques for Structures Characterization and Monitoring”" Remote Sensing 15, no. 13: 3382. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133382

APA Style

Fernandes, F., Rasol, M., Schirinzi, G., & Zhou, F. (2023). Editorial for the Special Issue “Radar Techniques for Structures Characterization and Monitoring”. Remote Sensing, 15(13), 3382. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133382

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop