Next Article in Journal
A Survey on SAR and Optical Satellite Image Registration
Next Article in Special Issue
A Three-Dimensional Block Adjustment Method for Spaceborne InSAR Based on the Range-Doppler-Phase Model
Previous Article in Journal
BiTSRS: A Bi-Decoder Transformer Segmentor for High-Spatial-Resolution Remote Sensing Images
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extension of Scattering Power Decomposition to Dual-Polarization Data for Tropical Forest Monitoring
 
 
Technical Note
Peer-Review Record

Construction of a Database of Pi-SAR2 Observation Data by Calibration and Scattering Power Decomposition Using the ABCI

Remote Sens. 2023, 15(3), 849; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030849
by Yuya Arima 1,*, Toshifumi Moriyama 2, Yoshio Yamaguchi 3, Ryosuke Nakamura 1, Chiaki Tsutsumi 1 and Shoichiro Kojima 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(3), 849; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030849
Submission received: 20 December 2022 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SAR, Interferometry and Polarimetry Applications in Geoscience)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The authors would like to thank you for your time and effort to review this manuscript.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript presents the processing details on elevation correction, polarimetric calibration, scattering power decomposition and orthorectification of Pi-SAR2 airborne polarimetric SAR data, together with the implementation using the AI Bridging Cloud Infrastructure. The description is very clear, especially some important equations are provided, which makes the manuscript more instructive.

I recommend this manuscript for publication after correction of some spelling mistakes.

 Some spelling mistakes are: 

1) Line 62, “. It is separate files for each of the observed polarizations”. Line 64, “There are separate files for each 64”. I assume that these two sentences tell one same thing.

2) Line 65 & 66, grand range should be ground range. Please check the full text for other possible occurrences of this wrong spelling.

Author Response

The authors would like to thank you for your time and effort to review this manuscript.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Find the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The authors would like to thank you for your time and effort to review this manuscript.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The clarification report provided by the authors is sufficient and the corresponding changes in the paper are also satisfactory. I do not have any further comments on the paper. I suggest publishing the paper as it is.

Back to TopTop