Editorial for the Special Issue “Latest Development in 3D Mapping Using Modern Remote Sensing Technologies”
- Mobile Mapping Sensors: Mobile mapping sensors might include passive imaging (i.e., electro-optical (EO) imaging), active LiDAR/depth, and/or direct georeferencing (e.g., Integrated Global Navigation Satellite Systems/Inertial Navigation Systems (GNSS/INS)) sensors. Both passive and active remote sensing technologies are considered. More specifically, articles [4,9] deal with imaging sensors, while those in [3,6,7,8,10] focus on LiDAR. Articles [1,2,5] deal with both imaging and LiDAR/depth sensors. Regarding georeferencing technologies, articles [3,5,6,7] deal with onboard GNSS/INS units, while articles [1,2] do not assume the presence of such sensors onboard the utilized platform.
- Mobile Mapping Platform: Mapping platforms can be spaceborne, airborne (either manned or unmanned), or terrestrial (e.g., manned vehicles, unmanned vehicles, portable, or tripod-mounted). Article [1] deals with image and point cloud data acquired by a tripod-mounted platform. Articles [2,5] deal with indoor point cloud data that can be acquired by a variety of platforms. Articles [3,4,6,7,8,10] deal with image and LiDAR data acquired by wheeled vehicles. Article [9] deals with indoor/outdoor imaging platforms for the derivation of point cloud data.
- Type of Geospatial Data Used: The geospatial data utilized in the different processing strategies are based on imaging, ranging, and/or georeferencing sensors. Moreover, either point/pixel or semantic data are involved. Articles [2,4,7,8,9,10] rely on semantically derived features/constraints in the processing of mobile mapping data. The remaining articles (i.e., [1,3,5,6]) are based on geometric features derived from either imaging or LiDAR geospatial data.
- Processing Strategy: Both geometric/morphological and learning-based strategies are addressed in this Special Issue. Articles [1,2,5,6,10] mainly deal with geometric/morphological data processing strategies, while articles [4,7,8] deal with learning-based strategies. Articles [3,9], on the other hand, deal with both geometric/morphological and learning strategies.
- Intended Environment and Application Domain: Different environments/application domains are addressed by the research papers. For example, article [1] deals with the estimation of the volume of stockpiles within indoor environments. Articles [2,5] deal with the 3D modeling of indoor environments, while articles [3,4,6,7,8,10] deal with the modeling of transportation corridors and their surrounding environment. Article [9] deals with the 3D modeling of both indoor and outdoor environments.
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, J.; Hasheminasab, S.M.; Zhou, T.; Manish, R.; Habib, A. An Image-Aided Sparse Point Cloud Registration Strategy for Managing Stockpiles in Dome Storage Facilities. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, R.; Xia, W.; Yan, C. Building Floorplan Reconstruction Based on Integer Linear Programming. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.-T.; Lin, Y.-C.; Habib, A. Generalized LiDAR Intensity Normalization and Its Positive Impact on Geometric and Learning-Based Lane Marking Detection. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Dai, Y.; Su, X.; Wu, W. Efficient Dual-Branch Bottleneck Networks of Semantic Segmentation Based on CCD Camera. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Xu, Z.; Chen, R.; Wang, T.; Wang, C.; Yan, C.; Xu, F. FastFusion: Real-Time Indoor Scene Reconstruction with Fast Sensor Motion. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalenjuk, S.; Lienhart, W. A Method for Efficient Quality Control and Enhancement of Mobile Laser Scanning Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Y.; Weinacker, H.; Koch, B. Towards Urban Scene Semantic Segmentation with Deep Learning from LiDAR Point Clouds: A Case Study in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, S.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Wu, M. LiDAR Odometry and Mapping Based on Semantic Information for Outdoor Environment. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stathopoulou, E.K.; Battisti, R.; Cernea, D.; Remondino, F.; Georgopoulos, A. Semantically Derived Geometric Constraints for MVS Reconstruction of Textureless Areas. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, H.; Xue, H.; Xie, G. MapCleaner: Efficiently Removing Moving Objects from Point Cloud Maps in Autonomous Driving Scenarios. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Habib, A.F. Editorial for the Special Issue “Latest Development in 3D Mapping Using Modern Remote Sensing Technologies”. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041109
Habib AF. Editorial for the Special Issue “Latest Development in 3D Mapping Using Modern Remote Sensing Technologies”. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(4):1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041109
Chicago/Turabian StyleHabib, Ayman F. 2023. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Latest Development in 3D Mapping Using Modern Remote Sensing Technologies”" Remote Sensing 15, no. 4: 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041109
APA StyleHabib, A. F. (2023). Editorial for the Special Issue “Latest Development in 3D Mapping Using Modern Remote Sensing Technologies”. Remote Sensing, 15(4), 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041109