Next Article in Journal
Reconstructing a Fine Resolution Landscape of Annual Gross Primary Product (1895–2013) with Tree-Ring Indices
Previous Article in Journal
Hyperspectral Image Transects during Transient Events in Rivers (HITTER): Framework Development and Application to a Tracer Experiment on the Missouri River, USA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Construction of Aerosol Model and Atmospheric Correction in the Coastal Area of Shandong Peninsula
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

An Editorial for the Special Issue “Aerosol and Atmospheric Correction”

1
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
2
School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
3
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3745; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193745
Submission received: 30 September 2024 / Accepted: 1 October 2024 / Published: 9 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aerosol and Atmospheric Correction)
Aerosol is an important atmospheric component that severely influences the global climate and air quality of our planet [1,2,3,4]. In quantitative remote sensing, aerosol is also a key factor in atmospheric correction of remote sensing data to obtain accurate surface information [5,6,7]. The radiation signal received by the sensor is surface–atmosphere coupled, including the signal of path radiance, surface reflection, and surface–atmosphere interaction, a phenomenon which impedes quantitative information acquisition from both surface and atmospheric aspects. Accurate aerosol estimation and atmospheric correction are needed to solve this problem.
In this Special Issue, the studies cover several important topics, mainly involving aerosol retrieval, aerosol emission and regional transfer, and atmospheric correction. The goal of this Special Issue is to discuss the accurate retrieval and estimation of aerosols to help with precise atmospheric correction and facilitate various corresponding scientific studies focusing on the development of new technologies, instruments, and methods.
Aerosol product quality limits their data applications. Some advancements are made in this Special Issue that improve aerosol detection and retrieval accuracy. Focusing on the characteristics of Coherent Doppler Wind Lidar (CDWL), a novel method for the calibration and quantitative assessment of aerosol properties is proposed [8]. The result is verified through comparison with synchronous Rayleigh–Mie–Raman Lidar (RMRL) data, resulting in good agreement, proving the ability of CDWL to retrieve aerosol properties accurately. Meanwhile, exploring aerosol retrieval of single-angle and multi-band polarization instruments containing short-wave infrared bands, surface and atmosphere decoupling without prior information about the surface is conducted based on optimal estimation theory [9]. The method can avoid the inversion error caused by the untimely updating of the surface reflectance database and the error in spatiotemporal matching. After being applied to the Particulate Observing Scanning Polarimeter (POSP) and validated by AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) measurements, the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm under different geographical regions and pollution conditions is verified. Another independent article thoroughly examines MODIS aerosol retrieval accuracies under different land cover types, aerosol types, and observation geometries based on AERONET measurements involving three different algorithms, namely Dark Target (DT), Deep Blue (DB), and Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC), each with unique characteristics [10]. This Special Issue also contains studies aimed toward the identification of specific aerosol types. A novel MERSI haze mask (MHAM) algorithm to directly categorize haze pixels in addition to cloudy and clear ones has been designed based on the Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer II (MERSI-II) on board the FY-3D satellite [11]. The algorithm can illustrate the boundary of the haze region with high reliability, remaining consistent with the true color image. Determining the threshold value for background aerosol optical depth (BAOD) is crucial for identifying aerosol types. A statistical method to select the best BAOD threshold value using VIIRS DB AOD products is proposed in this Special Issue [12]. The VIIRS aerosol type classification scheme was further updated using the BAOD threshold. The results indicate that the updated scheme can reliably detect changes in aerosol types under low aerosol loading conditions.
Using aerosol products, further scientific studies of atmospheric aerosol are conducted and included in this Special Issue. The seasonal characteristics and long-term variations in aerosol optical parameters in Hong Kong are analyzed using AERONET data and satellite-based observations based on the extreme-point symmetric mode decomposition (ESMD) model [13]. The interactions between aerosol loading and meteorological factors are also discussed. Another study uses Cloud–Aerosol LiDAR with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aerosol products to identify the global long-range aerosol transport pathways (the trans-Atlantic, the trans-Pacific, and the trans-Arabian Sea) [14]. Two significant paths within the range of the trans-Pacific transport pathway (aerosols from the Taklimakan Desert and aerosols from the North China Plain) are analyzed in detail. A three-stage conceptual model is further built, providing a straightforward and evident approach to exploring long-range aerosol transport pathways. To investigate frequently occurring severe haze pollution in northeast China, the vertical characteristics of aerosols and the causes of aerosol pollution throughout the year are analyzed using multisource data of ground-based LiDAR and Cloud–Aerosol LiDAR Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSOs) [15]. The contribution of dust, smoke, and firework aerosols are analyzed, and recommendations for pollution control policies are provided.
The effect of aerosols on atmospheric correction is also discussed. For Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) estimation, Bottom-of-Atmosphere (BOA) VNIR/SWIR reflectance retrieved from Top-Of-Atmosphere (TOA) radiance using atmospheric correction methods is needed. A thorough sensitivity study of SOC estimation in relation to aerosol optical depth and water vapor is conducted based on Earth Observing-1 Hyperion Hyperspectral data [16]. The research suggests using the FLAASH AC method to provide BOA reflectance values before SOC mapping. Another study focuses on improving the accuracy of remote sensing reflectance products in the nearshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula [17]. To achieve that goal, a monthly aerosol model based on aerosol data collected from the Mu Ping site in the coastal area of the Shandong Peninsula is developed to replace the standard model.
In summary, this Special Issue collects a series of representative studies in the research field of aerosol and atmospheric correction, mainly focusing on the improvement in aerosol identification and retrieval methods; atmospheric aerosol formation, transfer, and spatiotemporal variation; and the effect of aerosols on atmospheric correction and quantitative remote sensing. These advancements will help to continuously improve our understanding of atmospheric aerosol and the accuracy of quantitative remote sensing research. Despite the significant progress achieved, further related studies are still needed for the scientific community, policy makers, and the public to reduce evaluation uncertainty and combat the challenges faced in our society.

Author Contributions

This Editorial was prepared by S.S. and reviewed by X.G. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Future Talent Project of AIRCAS (grant number E4Z103010F), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 42005104), and China Scholarship Council (grant number CSC 202204910187).

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors would like to thank the authors who contributed to this Special Issue and the reviewers who helped to improve the quality of this Special Issue by providing constructive feedback to the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kaufman, Y.J.; Tanré, D.; Boucher, O. A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system. Nature 2002, 419, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stevens, B. Rethinking the lower bound on aerosol radiative forcing. J. Clim. 2015, 28, 4794–4819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, J.; Li, Z.; Lyapustin, A.; Wang, J.; Dubovik, O.; Schwartz, J.; Sun, L.; Li, C.; Liu, S.; Zhu, T. First close insight into global daily gapless 1 km PM2.5 pollution, variability, and health impact. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Johnston, F.; Henderson, S.; Chen, Y.; Randerson, J.T.; Marlier, M.; Defries, R.; Kinney, P.; Bowman, D.M.J.S.; Brauer, M. Estimated Global Mortality Attributable to Smoke from Landscape Fires. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mobley, C.D.; Werdell, J.; Franz, B.A.; Ahmad, Z.; Bailey, S.W. Atmospheric Correction for Satellite Ocean Color Radiometry; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
  6. Zhao, D.; Feng, L.; He, X. Global Gridded Aerosol Models Established for Atmospheric Correction over Inland and Nearshore Coastal Waters. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2023, 128, e2023JD038815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mannschatz, T.; Pflug, B.; Borg, E.; Feger, K.H.; Dietrich, P. Uncertainties of LAI estimation from satellite imaging due to atmospheric correction. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 153, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, M.; Xia, H.; Su, L.; Han, H.; Wang, X.; Yuan, J. The Detection of Desert Aerosol Incorporating Coherent Doppler Wind Lidar and Rayleigh–Mie–Raman Lidar. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fan, Y.; Sun, X.; Ti, R.; Huang, H.; Liu, X.; Yu, H. Aerosol Retrieval Study from a Particulate Observing Scanning Polarimeter Onboard Gao-Fen 5B without Prior Surface Knowledge, Based on the Optimal Estimation Method. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, J.; Liu, J.; Jiao, D.; Zha, Y.; Cao, S. Evaluation of MODIS DT, DB, and MAIAC Aerosol Products over Different Land Cover Types in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Si, Y.; Chen, L.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, L.; Wang, F.; Xu, N.; Zhang, X. A Novel Algorithm of Haze Identification Based on FY3D/MERSI-II Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Q.-X.; Huang, C.-L.; Dong, S.-K.; Lin, K.-F. Satellite-Based Background Aerosol Optical Depth Determination via Global Statistical Analysis of Multiple Lognormal Distribution. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, X.; Nichol, J.; Lee, K.H.; Li, J.; Wong, M.S. Analysis of Long-Term Aerosol Optical Properties Combining AERONET Sunphotometer and Satellite-Based Observations in Hong Kong. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Lyu, B.; Zhang, J.; Han, Y.; Bai, Y.; Guo, Z. The Identification and Analysis of Long-Range Aerosol Transport Pathways with Layered Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization Datasets from 2006 to 2016. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Duanmu, L.; Chen, W.; Guo, L.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, H.; Fu, J.; Song, G.; Xia, Z. Vertical Profiles of Aerosols Induced by Dust, Smoke, and Fireworks in the Cold Region of Northeast China. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mruthyunjaya, P.; Shetty, A.; Umesh, P.; Gomez, C. Impact of Atmospheric Correction Methods Parametrization on Soil Organic Carbon Estimation Based on Hyperion Hyperspectral Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shan, K.; Ma, C.; Lv, J.; Zhao, D.; Song, Q. Construction of Aerosol Model and Atmospheric Correction in the Coastal Area of Shandong Peninsula. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, S.; Gu, X.; Wei, J. An Editorial for the Special Issue “Aerosol and Atmospheric Correction”. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3745. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193745

AMA Style

Shi S, Gu X, Wei J. An Editorial for the Special Issue “Aerosol and Atmospheric Correction”. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(19):3745. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Shuaiyi, Xingfa Gu, and Jing Wei. 2024. "An Editorial for the Special Issue “Aerosol and Atmospheric Correction”" Remote Sensing 16, no. 19: 3745. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193745

APA Style

Shi, S., Gu, X., & Wei, J. (2024). An Editorial for the Special Issue “Aerosol and Atmospheric Correction”. Remote Sensing, 16(19), 3745. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop