Dietary Protein Intake and Determinants in Māori and Non-Māori Octogenarians. Te Puāwaitanga o Ngā Tapuwae Kia Ora Tonu: Life and Living in Advanced Age: A Cohort Study in New Zealand
1
College of Health, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand
2
School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand
3
James Henare Māori Research Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(7), 2079; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072079
Submission received: 11 June 2020
/
Revised: 8 July 2020
/
Accepted: 9 July 2020
/
Published: 14 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting of the Nutrition Society of New Zealand: Beyond Nutrition—kei tua i te kaitōtika)
Abstract
:Protein intake, food sources and distribution are important in preventing age-related loss of muscle mass and strength. The prevalence and determinants of low protein intake, food sources and mealtime distribution were examined in 214 Māori and 360 non-Māori of advanced age using two 24 h multiple pass recalls. The contribution of food groups to protein intake was assessed. Low protein intake was defined as ≤0.75 g/kg for women and ≤0.86 g/kg for men. A logistic regression model was built to explore predictors of low protein intake. A third of both women (30.9%) and men (33.3%) had a low protein intake. The main food group sources were beef/veal, fish/seafood, milk, bread though they differed by gender and ethnicity. For women and men respectively protein intake (g/meal) was lowest at breakfast (10.1 and 13.0), followed by lunch (14.5 and 17.8) and dinner (23.3 and 34.2). Being a woman (p = 0.003) and having depressive symptoms (p = 0.029) were associated with consuming less protein. In adjusted models the odds of adequate protein intake were higher in participants with their own teeth or partial dentures (p = 0.036). Findings highlight the prevalence of low protein intake, uneven mealtime protein distribution and importance of dentition for adequate protein intake among adults in advanced age.
1. Introduction
By 2051, the 85 years and over age group are expected to make up almost a quarter of the 65+ population [1]. The very old experience more co-morbidities and disabilities as they get older and can potentially place a high burden on health care costs and services [2]. We previously determined half (49%) of Māori and 38% of non-Māori octogenarians were at high risk of malnutrition [3].
Those who are malnourished may have an inadequate protein intake which could contribute to possessing lower muscle mass and strength [4]. Older adults have a lower rate of anabolism and are more likely to have poorer immune functions compared to younger adults, so their protein intake need is higher for their weight and physical activity [5]. Adequate protein intake is important for optimal muscle synthesis where protein intake below the estimated average requirements (EAR) of 0.75 g/kg/day for women and 0.86 g/kg/day for men using the New Zealand Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) [6] can lead to decreased physical function and can contribute to sarcopenia.
Protein can be obtained from both plant and animal sources; though they differ greatly in protein quality, rate of digestion and biological value, which affects the rate of skeletal muscle protein synthesis [7]. For example, animal sources such as meat, eggs and seafood have almost all the essential amino acids, higher biological value and can be digested quicker than plant sources such as vegetables and grains [8]. In the very old, bread and milk are the main source of protein in women and beef/veal, fish and seafood and bread in men [9].
The distribution of protein intake may also influence the maintenance of lean muscle mass. A key strategy for increasing the rate of protein synthesis is to evenly spread protein throughout the day, by aiming to have between 25 to 30 g of protein in each main meal [10]. In the Newcastle 85+ study of adults in advanced age, it was observed that protein intake was skewed towards the end of the day. Protein intake was lowest in the morning especially at breakfast whereas, the largest amount of protein was consumed during the evening meal [11].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the intake, food sources, distribution, and adequacy of protein among Māori and non-Māori participants in Te Puāwaitanga o Ngā Tapuwae Kia Ora Tonu; Life and Living in Advanced Age: A Cohort Study in New Zealand.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Life and Living in Advanced Age: A Cohort Study in New Zealand (LiLACS NZ)
We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the baseline and follow-up assessment of Life and Living in Advanced Age, A Cohort Study in New Zealand (LiLACS NZ), a longitudinal study of the very old in New Zealand [12]. Eligibility criteria were Māori aged 80 to 90 years and non-Māori aged 85 years living within the Bay of Plenty and Lakes District Health Board regions (excluding Taupo region). Younger Māori participants were recruited as the gap in life expectancy between Māori and non-Māori was 8.2 years for men and 8.8 years for women [13]. The details of the recruitment process are described elsewhere [14].
At baseline in 2010, 671 participants completed a comprehensive questionnaire, conducted by trained interviewers and a health assessment by a trained nurse [12]. Participants’ age, demographic, and health characteristics were established. Rates of participation varied across questionnaires and assessments.
A 12-month follow-up visit was undertaken in 2011 and included a physical assessment including weight, body mass index (BMI), fat mass and muscle mass as well as grip strength and level of physical activity. A detailed dietary assessment using the 24 h multiple pass recall (24 h MPR) on two separate days of the week was offered as part of that stage of the study.
2.2. Socio-Economic, Health and Physical Factors
At baseline, we established whether the participants had practical help available. Participants responded either yes/no to: “When you need some extra help, can you count on anyone to help with daily tasks like grocery shopping, cooking, house cleaning, telephoning, give you a ride?” Current living arrangement was categorized as living alone (yes/no). The NZ Deprivation (NZDep) index obtained from the Ministry of Health was used as an indication of sociodemographic deprivation. The index was constructed from geo-coded addresses and included eight dimensions of material and social deprivation reflecting lack of income, employment, communication, transport, educational qualifications, home ownership and living space [15]. During follow-up participants responded yes/no to whether they received a pension only income.
Health factors were established at baseline. Oral health was established by whether the participants wore dentures, had trouble with biting and chewing or had swallowing problems. Depression was assessed by the 15-item Geriatric Depression Screening Scale (GDS-15) [16], a reliable and valid self-rating depression screening scale developed specifically for older people [17]. A higher score indicates more depressive symptoms, with a cut-off of 5 or more considered to indicate significant depressive symptoms [18,19]. The twelve question version 2 of the Short Form health score (SF-12) [20] was used to provide a view of health related quality of life (QoL) of the participants based on their perceived experience, knowledge and awareness of their personal, physical, mental and emotional status. The scale presents two summary scores: Physical and mental health related QoL. The maximum score is 100; any score lower than 40 is indicative of perception of poor health and above 60 is indicative of reasonable and better health [20].
At follow-up the participants height was measured with a SECA 213 free-standing stadiometer two times unless the variance between both figures were greater than 1 cm then a third attempt was recorded [12]. Weight was estimated using a Tanita digital measuring scale (BC-545, Tanita Corporation) and height and weight were used to calculate BMI using the formula kg/m2. Measurement of fat mass and muscle mass were estimated by bioimpedance using the Tanita scale (Inner Scan Body Composition Monitor, BC-541, Tanita Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Grip strength was estimated using a Takei digital handgrip dynamometer-Grip D. The average value of three readings from the strongest hand was recorded [12]. A Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), validated in community living adults [21] was used to assess physical activity. PASE consists of ten items used to identify leisure, household and occupational related activity and duration of each activity over a one-week period. The total PASE score was derived by multiplying the duration of each activity (h/week) or participation (yes/no) by the empirically derived item weights and summing over all activities. Also, the following information was collected, age and pension only income was ascertained using the question “What are your sources of income?” The answers were categorized into either yes/no.
2.3. Dietary Assessment
As part of the follow-up assessment, 214 Māori and 360 non-Māori participants completed a 24 h MPR on two separate days of the week. The validity of the 24 h MPR is detailed elsewhere [22,23]. Interviewers were instructed to record the weight of the food either by reading food labels or estimating the portion size with household utensils. The ‘Photographic Atlas of Food Portion Sizes”, previously applied in the Newcastle 85+ study was adapted for the New Zealand diet and used to assess the portion of foods when an item could not be quantified [24,25]. Nutrient intakes were calculated by coding all foods and drinks recorded by the participants using the New Zealand Food Composition Database (NZFCDB). FOODFiles (2010), an electronic subset of data from the NZFCDB was used as the main source of food composition data and contained information on 2739 foods.
Protein intake was assessed using the NZ NRV’s [25] and estimated average requirements (EAR) in grams per kilogram adjusted for body weight per day, to determine the adequacy in men (0.86 g/kg/day) and women (0.75 g/kg/day). Protein distribution was assessed across breakfast, lunch, and dinner in grams per meal.
All foods from the 24 h MPR were allocated into one of thirty-three food items, used in the New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey (NZANS) (2008/09) that contributed to protein intake [26]. The top fifteen food items that contributed the most protein to the participants’ diet was reported. Supplements were not included.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to check for normality for variables (age, has practical help available, living alone, socio-economic deprivation, pension only income, wears dentures, difficulty biting and chewing, swallowing difficulties, depression, SF-12 physical health, SF-12 mental health, BMI, weight, grip strength, PASE score, fat mass percentage and muscle mass percentage). Categorical data were presented as percentage with corresponding sample size. Normally distributed data were expressed as a mean and standard deviation (±SD); non-Gaussian distributed variables were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). The Mann-Whitney u test and independent t-test were used to determine differences between Māori and non-Māori, men and women for age, SF-12 physical health, SF-12 mental health, BMI, weight, grip strength, PASE score, fat mass percentage, muscle mass percentage, energy, protein (energy %), protein (g/day), protein (g/kg/day), protein distribution (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and chi-square tests were used to test differences for categorical data (practical help available, living alone, socio-economic deprivation, pension only income, wears dentures, difficulty biting and chewing, swallowing difficulties, depression, total protein, acceptable macronutrient distribution range (AMDR), and low and adequate protein based on EAR). Protein from food groups were presented as a mean (±SD) and contribution to protein intake was expressed as a percentage (%) and adjusted for body weight (g/kg/day).
A reduced multivariate regression model was built to predict protein intake in g/kg/day. Age, gender and ethnicity were included in the model and other potential predictors included practical support, depression, living alone, NZDep (score), wears dentures, chewing problems, swallowing difficulties, SF-12 physical and mental health scores, and pension only income. Variables with the highest p-value were removed in the model and p ≤ 0.2 was considered statistically significant enough to warrant inclusion. A logistic regression model was constructed to predict meeting the EAR for adequate protein intake (g/kg/day). The IBM SPSS Statistics 23 program was used to conduct the statistical analysis.
2.5. Ethics Approval
The study was granted an ethics approval by the Northern Regional Ethics Committee of New Zealand in December 2009 (NTX/09/09/088).
3. Results
3.1. Participants Characteristics
At baseline 267 Māori and 414 non-Māori completed all measures. The sociodemographic health and physical characteristics of Māori and non-Māori men and women are illustrated in Table 1. The median age for Māori was 83 years (IQR 81–85), slightly younger than non-Māori with a median age of 86 years (IQR 85–86) (p < 0.001). More women (51% Māori, 65% non-Māori) than men (25% Māori, 36% non-Māori) lived alone (p < 0.001). Also, more women (54% Māori, 54% non-Māori) had full mouth dentures compared to men (42% Māori, 40% non-Māori) (p = 0.011). Rates of participation varied across the assessments both at baseline and at 12 months follow-up.
3.2. Dietary Assessment 24 h Multiple Pass Recall (MPR)
At 12 months follow up 224 Māori and 370 non-Māori completed all interview measures. There were 214 (96%) Māori and 360 (97%) non-Māori participants that completed the 2 × 24 h MPR dietary assessment and were weighed. Table 2 shows the energy, protein intake, distribution and requirements for Māori and non-Māori men and women. Women (1466 kcal/day (IQR 1219–1755)) were more likely to consume less total energy than men (1875 kcal/day (IQR 1537–2247)) (p < 0.001). Protein intake per day per kilogram of body weight was also significantly lower for women (58.6 g/day), (0.9 g/kg/day) compared to men (74.6 g/day), (1.0 g/kg/day) (p ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, women were more likely to consume less protein (g/meal) than men; at breakfast (10.1 g, 13.0 g), lunch (14.5 g, 17.8 g) and dinner (23.3 g, 34.2 g) (p < 0.001), respectively. Protein intake was greatest during the evening meal. On average women and men consumed 15.5% and 15.8% of their energy from protein, respectively (p = 0.003). Most participants met the EAR for protein intake for both women (69%) and men (67%). Māori (66% women, 72% men) were more likely to meet the AMDR for protein than non-Māori (56% women, 56% men) (p = 0.003).
3.3. Top Food Group Contributors to Protein Intake
As reported previously [8], % contribution from food groups to protein intake is shown in Table 3 and Table 4. Food groups are ranked from high to low by adequate protein intake (g/kg/day). Consumption of adequate and inadequate protein (g/kg/day) and protein intake (%) of the top 15 food groups based on EAR for women and men are shown. Overall, the largest contributors of adequate protein intake, for Māori and non-Māori were beef/veal, bread, and milk.
3.4. Determinants of Protein Intake (g/kg/day)
Controlling for age and ethnicity, a reduced multivariate regression model was built to predict determinants of protein intake (Table 5). For Māori and non-Māori participants being a woman (p = 0.003) and having depressive symptoms (p = 0.029) was associated with consuming less protein.
3.5. Logistic Regression Model to Predict Meeting the EAR for Protein (g/kg/day)
Table 6 shows a logistic regression model to predict meeting the EAR for protein in grams per kilogram per day for women (≤0.75 g/kg/day) and men (≤0.86 g/kg/day), after controlling for age and ethnicity. Māori and non-Māori participants with no dentures (their own teeth) or partial dentures were more likely to meet the EAR (p = 0.036).
Protein intake was not associated with health related QoL or socio-economic deprivation in either analysis.
4. Discussion
4.1. Protein Intake and Adequacy
Overall, we found the median protein intakes were 0.9 g/kg/day for women and 1.0 g/kg/day for men. A third of participants (30.9% of women, 33.3% of men), did not meet the EAR for older adults ≥70 years in Australia and New Zealand (≤0.75 g/kg/day women, ≤0.86 g/kg/day men) [6]. Protein intakes were similar to findings among adults (85 years) in the Newcastle 85+ study where the median protein intake was 0.96 g/kg/day women and 1.04 g/kg/day for men [11].
In Canada, among participants aged from 67 to 84 years in the NuAge study, the mean protein intake for men was 1.05 g/kg/day and 1.04 g/kg/day for women) [27] and among Dutch community dwelling older adults (mean age 77 years) men and women were observed to consume on average 1.07 g/kg/day and 1.05 g/kg/day of protein respectively; 10% of all participants did not meet the RDA (>0.8 g/kg/day) [28].
The optimal level of protein intake remains to be determined especially for those in advanced age. Australian and New Zealand recommendations for protein intake are aggregated for adults over 70 years and based on data derived from nitrogen balance studies in young adult men [6]. The EAR for adults >70 years was increased by 25% over that of young adults [29] without robust data on which to base that estimate. An international study group for optimal dietary protein intake in older people (PROT-AGE) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) suggest protein requirements need to be increased to 1.0–1.2 g/kg/day for healthy adults over 65 years to overcome anabolic resistance, sarcopenia and reduce the loss of muscle mass [6,30].
Using a reduced regression model adjusted for age and ethnicity we found being a woman (p = 0.003) and the presence of depressive symptoms (p = 0.029) predicted a lower protein intake adjusted for body weight. Conversely in the Newcastle 85+ study being a woman was associated with adequate protein intake (≥0.8 g/kg/day) in adjusted models [11].
There are a few studies which suggest that protein intake is higher in men compared to women adjusted for body weight. Among Brazilian older adults aged 60 to 104 years, a higher average protein intake (1.18 g/kg/day) was observed in men compared to women (1.01 g/kg/day) [31]. Similarly, among free-living Japanese older adults (≥70 years) women consumed significantly less protein (1.5 g/kg/day) than men (1.8 g/kg/day) [32]. Older women are reported to consume lower quality protein across the day and eat less meat or meat products as a result of being more health conscious than men [33]. Among older women who lived alone in the UK, an exploratory study found that the need to cook high protein foods, their often perishable nature and high cost were barriers to consuming these foods [34] and this may be a contributing factor in the current study as more women lived alone than men.
Our findings observed that the presence of depressive symptoms was associated with consuming less protein as had been observed among older men (>70 years) in South Korea; those with an inadequate protein intake were almost nine times more likely to be at risk of having depression [35]. It has also been observed that depressive symptoms were significantly increased among those who consumed a low protein diet (<0.8 g/kg/day) among older Italians with type 2 diabetes and chronic renal disease [36]. Depression has an impact on appetite and overall food intake [37] and in the baseline assessment of LiLACS NZ we found depressive symptoms were associated with high nutrition risk for non-Māori [3].
Using a logistic regression model controlled for age and ethnicity we found the oral health of the participants predicted meeting the EAR for protein for both women (≥0.75 g/kg/day) and men (≥0.86 g/kg/day). Participants with their own teeth or partial dentures were more likely to have an adequate protein intake than those with full dentures (p = 0.036). Edentulism was more common in women (54%) than men (41%) which may partially account for the lower protein intake (g/kg/day) observed among women. In New Zealand removing all teeth at a young age was common practice during the early to mid-twentieth century and at this time New Zealand had the highest rate of edentulous people in a developed country [38]. Inadequate access to dentists and lack of income for on-going dental care led to an ‘edentulism epidemic’ with individuals often being between the ages of 15 to 40 years at the time of extraction [38]. In the Newcastle 85+ study, it was observed that a higher protein intake (RDA > 0.8 g/kg/day) was significantly associated with a higher tooth count [11] which confirms the importance of oral health for eating foods which provide an adequate protein intake. Similarly, among individuals aged 74 years in Japan, those with ≥21 versus <20 teeth had a significantly higher intake of total protein and animal protein [39] and in Bulgaria individuals aged 47 to 89 years with less teeth also had a significantly lower intake of protein and animal protein (meats) [40].
Older adults with no teeth or ill-fitting dentures are known to have more difficulties in chewing hard textured foods such as meat [41] and denture wearers have a decreased bite force and experience pain compared to those with natural teeth [42] all of which may compromise protein intake. Our study adds to the body of evidence that the oral health status of adults in advanced age is generally deficient, and surveillance and improvement of oral health in older people should be a key priority.
4.2. Protein Distribution
We observed a skewed protein distribution (g/meal), with the highest intake at dinner and the least at breakfast. This may reflect the typical New Zealand eating pattern where protein is eaten mostly at the dinner meal. In the Newcastle 85+ study, 22% of the protein intake occurred in the morning, most (35%) during the “lunch” period followed by 21% over the “dinner” period [11]. The latter observation may have led to earlier satiety in the day resulting in a lower protein intake at dinner [43]. In the Netherlands, protein intake has also been observed to be lowest at breakfast (9.9 g), and highest at both lunch (28.0 g) and dinner (27.0 g) among community dwelling older adults (75 to 97 years) [28]. Likewise, older men and women (67 to 82 years) had a lower protein intake at breakfast (16 g, 11 g) and similar intakes across lunch (28 g, 26 g) and dinner (32 g, 26.5 g), respectively in the NuAge study [44]. Similarly, among German community dwelling older adults (75 to 85 years) the least amount of protein was consumed at breakfast (16.5g), with slightly more at lunch (24.2 g) and dinner (21.9 g) [45]. As protein intakes of 25 to 30 g spread evenly across breakfast, lunch and dinner have been suggested to stimulate muscle protein synthesis [4,46] and lead to increased muscle mass retention [44], our findings suggest that a food-based approach for increasing protein intake needs to include increased protein at the breakfast meal.
4.3. Protein Sources
For participants with an adequate protein intake (>EAR), beef/veal, bread and milk were the top three sources of protein and sources differed between sex and ethnic groups. In those with a low protein intake (≤EAR) bread was the main source followed by milk and beef/veal for Māori women and non-Māori men and women. This differed for Māori men where beef/veal was the main source followed by bread and fish and seafood. For Māori, fish and seafood (kāimoana) are traditional kai (foods) and hold a strong importance in Māori well-being [47] especially where the marae (meeting house) is closer to the sea [48]. However, due to the shortage of kāimoana as a result of pollution, Māori predominantly consume a Western diet that includes food such as bread and milk that are lower in protein content as reflected in the Māori octogenarians in this study.
Our findings are consistent with the NZANS survey (2008/09) which observed the largest food contributors of protein were bread (14.3%, 14.2%), followed by milk (10.8%, 11.5%) and beef/veal (10.1%, 9.3%) in both men and women aged over 70 years, respectively [26].
4.4. Strengths and Limitations
Our study is the first to report the determinants of protein intake among Māori and non-Māori octogenarians in New Zealand using a repeat 24 h multiple pass recall which provides the best available method in this age group [22]. Māori participants were younger, with a higher BMI, than non-Māori and culturally different food sources of protein were evident. Mis-reporting and under-reporting may have occurred. However, protein rich foods are usually not understated compared to food items with a negative health image (e.g., cakes, sweets, confectionery) [49]. Detailed comparisons between studies may be hindered by different dietary assessment methods and participants characteristics such as geographic location, age, body composition as well as health and nutritional status.
5. Conclusions
This study found a third of the participants did not meet the EAR for adequate protein intake. We observed an uneven mealtime protein distribution pattern, and the food group contributors to protein intake differed by gender and ethnicity. Depression was associated with protein intake, and the odds of consuming an adequate protein intake were higher in participants with their own teeth or partial dentures (adjusted models). Our findings highlight the prevalence and determinants of low protein intake among Māori and non-Māori of advanced age which may help to inform preventative interventions to improve the nutritional health of the oldest old.
Author Contributions
A.R. analyzed the data, performed statistical analysis and wrote the paper; S.A.M. performed and assisted in data analysis; C.W., M.M.-L. and N.K. are part of the LiLACS NZ team that designed and conducted the study and critically reviewed the paper, commented, and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand programme grant (HRC 09/068B; main funding body) and Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga (the New Zealand National Centre for Research Excellence for Māori; funded Māori engagement and project management).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the organizations contracted to conduct the LiLACS NZ study in the communities of origin: Western Bay of Plenty PHO, Ngā Matāpuna Oranga Kaupapa Māori PHO, Rotorua Area Primary Health Services, Te Korowai Aroha Trust and Te Runanga o Ngati Pikiao, Te Rūnunga o Ngati Awa Research and Archives Trust, Te Rūnunga o Ngati Iripuaia and Te Whānau a Apanui Community Health Centre. The authors tank all participants and their whānau for participation. We thank the Rōpu Kaitiaki: Hone and Florence Kameta, Betty McPherson, Paea Smith, Leiana Reynolds and Waiora Port for their guidance.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Statistics, N.Z. Age and Sex by Ethnic Group (Grouped Total Responses), for Census usually Resident Population Counts 2006, 2013 and 2018 Censuses (RC, TA, SA2, DHB). Available online: http://nzdotstat.stats.govt.nz/wbos/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TABLECODE8277 (accessed on 10 December 2019).
- Ministry of Health. Older people’s Health Data and Stats. Available online: https://www.health.govt.nz/nz-health-statistics/health-statistics-and-data-sets/older-peoples-health-data-and-stats (accessed on 22 October 2019).
- Wham, C.A.; Teh, R.; Moyes, S.; Dyall, L.; Kepa, M.; Hayman, K.; Kerse, N. Health and social factors associated with nutrition risk: Results from life and living in advanced age: A cohort study in New Zealand (LILACS NZ). J. Nutr. Health Aging 2015, 19, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paddon-Jones, D.; Rasmussen, B.B. Dietary protein recommendations and the prevention of sarcopenia: Protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2009, 12, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bauer, J.; Biolo, G.; Cederholm, T.; Cesari, M.; Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Morley, J.E.; Phillips, S.; Sieber, C.; Stehle, P.; Teta, D.; et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: A position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2013, 14, 542–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NHMRC (National Health and Medical Research Council). Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand: Including Recommended Dietary Intakes; Commonwealth of. Australia: Canberra, Australia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, S.M.; Tang, J.E.; Moore, D.R. The role of milk and soy based protein in support of muscle protein synthesis and muscle protein accretion in young and elderly persons. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2009, 28, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tome, D. Criteria and markers for protein quality assessment—A review. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, S222–S229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wham, C.; Teh, R.; Moyes, S.A.; Rolleston, A.; Muru-Lanning, M.; Hayman, K.; Adamson, A.; Kerse, N. Macronutrient intake in advanced age: Te puāwaitanga o ngā tapuwae kia ora tonu, life and living in advanced age: A cohort study in new zealand (LiLACS NZ). Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 116, 1103–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mamerow, M.M.; Mettler, J.A.; English, K.L.; Casperson, S.L.; Arentson-Lantz, E.; Sheffield-Moore, M.; Layman, D.K.; Paddon-Jones, D. Dietary protein distribution positively influences 24-h muscle protein synthesis in healthy adults. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mendonça, N.; Granic, A.; Mathers, J.C.; Hill, T.R.; Siervo, M.; Adamson, A.J.; Jagger, C. Prevalence and determinants of low protein intake in very old adults: Insights from the Newcastle 85+ Study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 2713–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hayman, K.J.; Kerse, N.; Dyall, L.; Kepa, M.; Teh, R.; Wham, C.; Clair, V.W.; Wiles, J.; Keeling, S.; Connolly, M.J.; et al. Life and living in advanced age: A cohort study in New Zealand-Te Puāwaitanga o Nga Tapuwae Kia Ora Tonu, LiLACS NZ: Study protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2012, 12, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- The Social Report 2008. Available online: http://socialreport.msd.govt.nz/2008/index.html (accessed on 15 January 2020).
- Dyall, L.; Kepa, M.; Hayman, K.; Teh, R.; Moyes, S.; Broad, J.B.; Kerse, N. Engagement and recruitment of Māori and non-Māori people of advanced age to LiLACS NZ. Australian and New Zealand. J. Public Health 2013, 37, 124–131. [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson, J.; Salmond, C.; Crampton, P. NZDep, 2013 Index of Deprivation; Department of Public Health, University of Otago: Wellington, New Zealand, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Montorio, I.; Izal, M. The Geriatric Depression Scale: A Review of Its Development and Utility. Int. Psychogeriatr. 1996, 8, 103–112. [PubMed]
- Yesavage, J.; Sheikh, J. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Recent Evidence and Development of a Shorter Version. Clin. Gerontol. 1986, 5, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, O.P.; Almeida, S.A. Short versions of the geriatric depression scale: A study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 1999, 14, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conradsson, M.; Rosendahl, E.; Littbrand, H.; Gustafson, Y.; Olofsson, B.; Lövheim, H. Usefulness of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version among very old people with and without cognitive impairment. Aging Ment. Health 2013, 17, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fleishman, J.A.; Selim, A.J.; Kazis, L. Deriving SF-12v2 physical and mental health summary scores: A comparison of different scoring algorithms. Qual. Life Res. 2000, 19, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Washburn, R.A.; McAuley, E.; Katula, J.; Mihalko, S.L.; Boileau, R.A. The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): Evidence for validity. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1999, 52, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamson, A.J.; Collerton, J.; Davies, K.; Foster, E.; Jagger, C.; Stamp, E.; Mathers, J.C.; Kirkwood, T. Nutrition in advanced age: Dietary assessment in the Newcastle 85+ study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nelson, M.; Dick, K.; Holmes, B.; Thomas, R.; Dowler, E.A. Low Income Diet. Methods Study; Food Standards Agency: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, M.; Atkinson, M.; Meyer, J. A Photographic Atlas of Food Portions Sizes; MAFF Publications: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, F.; Morritz, W.; McGuiness, P.; Hackett, A.F. A study of the use of a photographic food atlas to estimate served and self-served portion sizes. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 1997, 10, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parnell, W.; Wilson, N.; Thomson, C.; Mackay, S.; Stefanogiannis, N. A Focus on Nutrition: Key Findings of the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey; Ministry of Health: Wellington, New Zealand, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Farsijani, S.; Payette, H.; Morais, J.A.; Shatenstein, B.; Gaudreau, P.; Chevalier, S. Even mealtime distribution of protein intake is associated with greater muscle strength, but not with 3-y physical function decline, in free-living older adults: The Quebec longitudinal study on Nutrition as a Determinant of Successful Aging (NuAge study). Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 106, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tieland, M.; Borgonjen-van den Berg, K.J.; van Loon, L.J.; de Groot, L.C. Dietary protein intake in community-dwelling, frail, and institutionalized elderly people: Scope for improvement. Eur. J. Nutr. 2012, 51, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, W.W.; Trappe, T.A.; Wolfe, R.R.; Evans, W.J. The recommended dietary allowance for protein may not be adequate for older people to maintain skeletal muscle. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M373–M380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Deutz, N.E.; Bauer, J.M.; Barazzoni, R.; Biolo, G.; Boirie, Y.; Bosy-Westphal, A.; Cederholm, T.; Cruz-Jentoft, A.; Krznariç, Z.; Nair, K.S.; et al. Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: Recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 33, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gaspareto, N.; Previdelli, A.N.; Aquino, R.D. Factors associated with protein consumption in elderly. Nutr. J. 2017, 30, 805–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Watanabe, R.; Hanamori, K.; Kadoya, H.; Nishimuta, M.; Miyazaki, H. Nutritional intakes in community-dwelling older Japanese adults: High intakes of energy and protein based on high consumption of fish, vegetables and fruits provide sufficient micronutrients. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2004, 50, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chernoff, R. Protein and older adults. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2004, 23, 627S–630S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Best, R.L.; Appleton, K.M. The consumption of protein-rich foods in older adults: An. exploratory focus group study. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2013, 45, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, Y.H.; Choi-Kwon, S.; Park, K.A.; Suh, M.; Jung, Y.S. Nutrient deficiencies and depression in older adults according to sex: A cross sectional study. Nurs. Health Sci. 2017, 19, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ciarambino, T.; Castellino, P.; Paolisso, G.; Coppola, L.; Ferrara, N.; Signoriello, G.; Giordano, M. Long term effects of low protein diet on depressive symptoms and quality of life in elderly Type 2 diabetic patients. Clin. Nephrol. 2012, 78, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ávila-Funes, J.A.; Gray-Donald, K.; Payette, H. Association of nutritional risk and depressive symptoms with physical performance in the elderly: The Quebec longitudinal study of nutrition as a determinant of successful aging (NuAge). J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2008, 27, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sussex, P.V.; Thomson, W.M.; Fitzgerald, R.P. Understanding the ‘epidemic’ of complete tooth loss among older New Zealanders. Gerodontology 2010, 27, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshihara, A.; Watanabe, R.; Nishimuta, M.; Hanada, N.; Miyazaki, H. The relationship between dietary intake and the number of teeth in elderly Japanese subjects. Gerodontology 2005, 22, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pancheva, R.; Konstantinova, D.; Dimova-Gabrovska, M. Nutrition in subjects with complete dentures: Energy and macronutrient intake. J. IMAB–Annu. Proc. Sci. Pap. 2018, 24, 2104–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hutton, B.; Feine, J.; Morais, J. Is there an association between edentulism and nutritional state? J.-Can. Dent. Assoc. 2002, 68, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Polzer, I.; Schimmel, M.; Müller, F.; Biffar, R. Edentulism as part of the general health problems of elderly adults. Int. Dent. J. 2010, 60, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- de Castro, J.M. When, how much and what foods are eaten are related to total daily food intake. J. Nutr. 2009, 102, 1228–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Farsijani, S.; Morais, J.A.; Payette, H.; Gaudreau, P.; Shatenstein, B.; Gray-Donald, K.; Chevalier, S. Relation between mealtime distribution of protein intake and lean mass loss in free-living older adults of the NuAge study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gingrich, A.; Spiegel, A.; Kob, R.; Schoene, D.; Skurk, T.; Hauner, H.; Sieber, C.C.; Volkert, D.; Kiesswetter, E. Amount, distribution, and quality of protein intake are not associated with muscle mass, strength, and power in healthy older adults without functional limitations—An enable study. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Volpi, E.; Campbell, W.W.; Dwyer, J.T.; Johnson, M.A.; Jensen, G.L.; Morley, J.E.; Wolfe, R.R. Is the optimal level of protein intake for older adults greater than the recommended dietary allowance? J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2013, 68, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cambie, R.C.; Ferguson, L.R. Potential functional foods in the traditional Maori diet. Mutat. Res./Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2003, 523, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rush, E.C.; Hsi, E.; Ferguson, L.R.; Williams, M.H.; Simmons, D. Traditional foods reported by a Māori community in 2004. MAI Rev. 2010, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Macdiarmid, J.; Blundell, J. Assessing dietary intake: Who, what and why of under-reporting. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1998, 11, 231–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1.
Sociodemographic, health and physical characteristics of Māori and non-Māori men and women.
Table 1.
Sociodemographic, health and physical characteristics of Māori and non-Māori men and women.
| Māori | Non-Māori | p-Value ¥ | p-Value ◊ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | Men | Total Māori | Women | Men | Total Non-Māori | (Ethnic Group) | (Sex) | |
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Number | 124 (57.9) | 90 (42.1) | 214 (37.3) | 189 (52.5) | 171 (47.5) | 360 (62.7) | ||
| Age (years) (Median, IQR) | 84 (81–86) | 82 (81–85) | 83 (81–85) | 86 (85–86) | 86 (85–86) | 86 (85–86) | p < 0.001* | 0.452 |
| Has practical help available | ||||||||
| No Yes | 7 (6.6) 99 (93.4) | 3 (4) 72 (96) | 10 (5.5) 171 (94.5) | 21 (11.5) 162 (88.5) | 16 (9.5) 152 (90.5) | 37 (10.5) 314 (89.5) | 0.053 | 0.449 |
| Living alone | ||||||||
| No Yes | 52 (49.1) 54 (50.9) | 56 (74.7) 19 (25.3) | 108 (59.7) 73 (40.3) | 64 (35) 119 (65) | 106 (63.9) 60 (36.1) | 170 (48.7) 179 (51.3) | 0.017 | p < 0.001* |
| Socio-economic deprivation (NZDep score) | ||||||||
| 1–4 (least) 5–7 8–10 (most) | 18 (14.5) 24 (19.4) 82 (66.1) | 13 (14.4) 26 (28.9) 51 (56.7) | 31 (14.5) 50 (23.4) 133 (62.1) | 36 (19) 77 (40.7) 76 (40.2) | 50 (29.2) 70 (40.9) 51 (29.8) | 86 (23.9) 147 (40.8) 127 (35.3) | p < 0.001* | 0.016 |
| Pension only income | ||||||||
| No Yes | 54 (57.4) 40 (42.6) | 34 (51.5) 32 (48.5) | 88 (55.0) 72 (45.0) | 118 (69.4) 52 (30.6) | 112 (74.7) 38 (25.3) | 230 (71.9) 90 (28.1) | p < 0.001* | 0.574 |
| Wears dentures | ||||||||
| No dentures Partial Full mouth | 18 (18.9) 26 (27.4) 51 (53.7) | 17 (26.6) 20 (31.3) 27 (42.2) | 35 (22.0) 46 (28.9) 78 (49.1) | 32 (18.9) 45 (26.6) 92 (54.4) | 37 (24.5) 54 (35.8) 60 (39.7) | 69 (21.6) 99 (30.9) 152 (47.5) | 0.903 | 0.011 |
| Difficulty biting and chewing | ||||||||
| Never, rarely Sometimes, often, always | 76 (80) 19 (20) | 52 (81.3) 12 (18.8) | 128 (80.5) 31 (19.5) | 137 (80.6) 33 (19.4) | 127 (84.7) 23 (15.3) | 264 (82.5) 56 (17.5) | 0.593 | 0.356 |
| Swallowing difficulties | ||||||||
| Never, rarely Sometimes, often, always | 76 (80.9) 18 (19.1) | 53 (91.4) 5 (8.6) | 129 (84.9) 23 (15.1) | 135 (88.8) 17 (11.2) | 136 (90.1) 15 (9.9) | 271 (89.4) 32 (10.6) | 0.158 | 0.129 |
| Depression (GDS-15) | ||||||||
| 0–4 (Not depressed) 5–15 (Depressed) | 87 (82.1) 19 (17.9) | 51 (68) 24 (32) | 138 (76.2) 43 (23.8) | 149 (81.9) 33 (18.1) | 146 (86.9) 22 (13.1) | 295 (84.3) 55 (15.7) | 0.024 | 0.796 |
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | |||
| SF-12 Physical health | 45.2 (37.0, 52.5) | 46.8 (32.3, 52.4) | 45.6 (35.4, 52.5) | 43.0 (30.3, 51.4) | 46.7 (38.1, 52.3) | 44.8 (34.8, 52.1) | 0.548 | 0.093 |
| SF-12 Mental health | 55.3 (47.7, 59.0) | 54.5 (45.6, 58.9) | 54.7 (47.1, 59.0) | 57.1 (51.6, 60.7) | 56.3 (51.7, 59.2) | 56.7 (51.7, 60.1) | 0.024 | 0.325 |
| Anthropometry-Physical assessment | ||||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.7 (24.0, 31.6) | 28.0 (25.5, 32.1) | 28.5 (24.7, 31.8) | 26.5 (23.7, 30.2) | 26.2 (24.1, 28.5) | 26.3 (24.0, 29.3) | p < 0.001* | 0.992 |
| Weight (kg) | 66.9 (58.8, 79.9) | 77.9 (68.7, 87.6) | 71.9 (63.4, 84.5) | 63.8 (57.4, 72.1) | 75.1 (70.0, 82.2) | 70.9 (61.9, 78.4) | 0.024 | p < 0.001* |
| Grip strength (kg) | 20.0 (17.4, 23.0) | 29.9 (25.1, 35.0) | 22.6 (18.3. 28.7) | 18.4 (15.1, 21.3) | 30.4 (25.6, 33.9) | 22.6 (17.5, 30.0) | 0.866 | P < 0.001* |
| PASE score | 77 (34, 124) | 96 (51, 144) | 83 (47, 138) | 70 (36, 112) | 86 (39, 127) | 75 (36, 119) | 0.109 | 0.012 |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||
| Fat mass (%) | 37.6 (±7.3) | 29.5 (±10.1) | 34.4 (±9.4) | 37.9 (±6.1) | 28.0 (±6.1) | 33.0 (±7.9) | 0.100 | 0.806 |
| Muscle mass (%) | 59.0 (±7.0) | 67.7 (±7.4) | 62.5 (±8.3) | 58.4 (±7.6) | 68.4 (±5.8) | 63.3 (±8.4) | 0.612 | 0.233 |
Variables are from Waves 1 or 2 questionnaires. Number (percentage, %). Median (25th–75th percentiles). Mean (±SD). ¥: Differences between Māori and non-Māori participants (Mann-Whitney u Test. Chi-square Test, Independent samples t-test). ◊: Differences between men and women (Mann-Whitney u Test, Chi-square Test, Independent samples t-test) * p-value < 0.001 considered significant.
Table 2.
Energy, protein intake, distribution and requirements for Māori and non-Māori men and women.
Table 2.
Energy, protein intake, distribution and requirements for Māori and non-Māori men and women.
| Women | Men | p-Value ¥ | p-Value ◊ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maori | Non-Māori | Total | Maori | Non-Māori | Total | (Ethnic Group) | (Sex) | |
| (n, %) | 124 (39.6%) | 189 (60.4%) | 313 (54.5%) | 90 (34.5%) | 171 (65.5%) | 261 (45.5%) | ||
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | |||
| Energy (kcal) | 1433 (1147, 1724) | 1499 (1267, 1793) | 1466 (1219, 1755) | 1747 (1444, 2164) | 1890 (1604, 2295) | 1875 (1537, 2247) | 0.001 | p < 0.001* |
| Protein (% energy) | 16.2 (13.8, 19.8) | 15.3 (13.4, 17.7) | 15.5 (13.6, 18.1) | 16.3 (14.6, 18.7) | 15.5 (13.3, 17.8) | 15.8 (13.6, 17.9) | 0.003 | 0.709 |
| Total protein AMDR (% energy) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| ≤14% 15% and above | 42 (33.9) 82 (66.1) | 84 (44.4) 105 (55.6) | 126 (40.3) 187 (59.7) | 26 (28.9) 64 (71.1) | 76 (44.4) 95 (55.6) | 102 (39.1) 159 (60.9) | 0.003 | 0.774 |
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | |||
| Protein (g) | 55.4 (46.2, 72.3) | 59.8 (48.0, 68.7) | 58.6 (47.0, 70.8) | 72.9 (53.4, 93.5) | 75.5 (61.9, 88.0) | 74.6 (59.6, 89.7) | 0.270 | p < 0.001* |
| Protein (g/kg) | 0.86 (0.64–1.11) | 0.90 (0.73–1.12) | 0.87 (0.68–1.12) | 0.97 (0.73–1.35) | 0.97 (0.84–1.18) | 0.97 (0.78–1.21) | 0.176 | 0.001 |
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Protein distribution (g/meal) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||
| Breakfast | 9.7 (7.2, 14.4) | 10.4 (7.0, 13.3) | 10.1 (7.1, 13.7) | 11.9 (8.7, 17.9) | 13.1 (10.2, 17.9) | 13.0 (9.4, 17.9) | 0.324 | p < 0.001* |
| Lunch | 14.6 (9.3, 23.4) | 14.4 (10.4, 20.9) | 14.5 (10.0, 21.6) | 16.8 (10.7, 24.5) | 18.3 (12.9, 25.1) | 17.8 (12.2, 25.0) | 0.381 | p < 0.001* |
| Dinner | 23.3 (13.7, 30.3) | 23.2 (14.3, 32.6) | 23.3 (14.2, 31.4) | 35.2 (20.1, 54.1) | 33.5 (21.9, 45.6) | 34.2 (21.0, 46.4) | 0.873 | p < 0.001* |
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| ¹ EAR Low Protein | ||||||||
| Women ≤ 0.75 g/kg Men ≤ 0.86 g/kg | 42 (36.2) - | 50 (27.5) - | 92 (30.9) - | - 36 (42.9) | - 48 (28.6) | - 84 (33.3) | 0.015 | |
| ¹ EAR Adequate Protein | ||||||||
| Women > 0.75 g/kg Men > 0.86 g/kg | 74 (63.8) - | 132 (72.5) - | 206 (69.1) - | - 48 (57.1) | - 120 (71.4) | - 168 (66.7) | 0.037 | |
Variables are from Wave 2 questionnaire. Median (25th–75th percentile). Number (n) (percentage, %). ¹ Low protein and Adequate protein based on Estimated Average Requirements (EAR), for over 70 years old Women 0.75 g/kg/day, Men 0.86 g/kg/day. Differences between Māori and non- Māori participants (Mann-Whitney u-Test, Chi-square Test, Independent samples t-test). Differences between men and women (Mann-Whitney u-Test, Chi-square Test, Independent samples t-test). * p-value < 0.001 considered significant. ¥: Differences between Māori and non-Māori participants (Mann-Whitney u Test. Chi-square Test, Independent samples t-test). ◊: Differences between men and women (Mann-Whitney u Test, Chi-square Test, Independent samples t-test).
Table 3.
Top 15 food group intake for Māori and non-Māori women low and adequate protein intake based on the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR).
Table 3.
Top 15 food group intake for Māori and non-Māori women low and adequate protein intake based on the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR).
| Māori Women | Non-Māori Women | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contribution to Protein Intake (%) | Protein Intake (g/kg/day) | Contribution to Protein Intake (%) | Protein Intake (g/kg/day) | ||||||
| Food Groups | Low protein (≤0.74 g/kg/day) | Adequate protein (>0.75 g/kg/day) | Low protein (≤0.74 g/kg/day) | Adequate protein (>0.75 g/kg/day) | Food Groups | Low protein (≤0.74 g/kg/day) | Adequate protein (>0.75 g/kg/day) | Low protein (≤0.74 g/kg/day) | Adequate protein (>0.75 g/kg/day) |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| Beef, veal | 7.3 (±12.5) | 12.9 (±15.9) | 0.07 (±0.13) | 0.13 (±0.16) | Milk | 12.7 (±12.4) | 12.2 (±8.3) | 0.13 (±0.12) | 0.12 (±0.08) |
| Milk | 10.1 (±7.9) | 11.0 (±8.0) | 0.10 (±0.08) | 0.11 (±0.08) | Bread | 13.5 (±9.2) | 11.3 (±6.8) | 0.14 (±0.09) | 0.11 (±0.07) |
| Bread | 17.4 (±7.6) | 10.5 (±6.7) | 0.17 (±0.08) | 0.11 (±0.07) | Beef, veal | 9.4 (±11.6) | 10.0 (±12.4) | 0.09 (±0.12) | 0.10 (±0.12) |
| Fish, seafood | 6.7 (±17.0) | 9.3 (±12.5) | 0.07 (±0.17) | 0.09 (±0.13) | Poultry | 6.0 (±10.9) | 6.6 (±11.8) | 0.06 (±0.11) | 0.07 (±0.12) |
| Pork | 4.9 (±8.2) | 9.0 (±15.5) | 0.05 (±0.08) | 0.09 (±0.16) | Fish, seafood | 3.5 (±10.7) | 5.5 (±11.7) | 0.03 (±0.11) | 0.06 (±0.12) |
| Poultry | 5.8 (±9.7) | 7.5 (±12.3) | 0.06 (±0.10) | 0.08 (±0.12) | Pork | 3.0 (±6.2) | 5.0 (±8.1) | 0.03 (±0.06) | 0.05 (±0.08) |
| Cereals | 4.9 (±5.0) | 4.6 (±3.4) | 0.05 (±0.05) | 0.05 (±0.03) | Cheese | 4.3 (±7.8) | 5.0 (±6.0) | 0.04 (±0.08) | 0.05 (±0.06) |
| Egg, egg dishes | 3.7 (±7.0) | 3.8 (±5.6) | 0.04 (±0.07) | 0.04 (±0.06) | Cereals | 4.0 (±4.0) | 5.0 (±4.6) | 0.04 (±0.04) | 0.05 (±0.05) |
| Vegetables | 4.5 (±3.2) | 3.7 (±2.2) | 0.05 (±0.03) | 0.04 (±0.02) | Vegetables | 4.8 (±3.1) | 4.8 (±3.3) | 0.05 (±0.03) | 0.05 (±0.03) |
| Cheese | 3.3 (±7.9) | 3.6 (±5.9) | 0.03 (±0.08) | 0.04 (±0.06) | Egg, egg dishes | 3.2 (±5.9) | 3.9 (±5.8) | 0.03 (±0.06) | 0.04 (±0.06) |
| Potato, kumara, taro | 2.5 (±2.4) | 3.0 (±1.9) | 0.03 (±0.02) | 0.03 (±0.02) | Mutton (Sheep, lamb) | 0.0 (±0.0) | 3.6 (±9.6) | 0.00 (±0.00) | 0.04 (±0.10) |
| Mutton (Sheep, lamb) | 1.5 (±4.8) | 2.6 (±9.2) | 0.02 (±0.05) | 0.03 (±0.09) | Fruit | 3.3 (±2.9) | 2.8 (±2.1) | 0.03 (±0.03) | 0.03 (±0.02) |
| Fruit | 3.0 (±2.7) | 2.0 (±2.0) | 0.03 (±0.03) | 0.02 (±0.02) | Sausage, processed meats | 2.7 (±7.3) | 2.3 (±5.6) | 0.03 (±0.07) | 0.02 (±0.06) |
| Sausage, processed meats | 3.0 (±7.0) | 1.7 (±4.7) | 0.03 (±0.07) | 0.02 (±0.05) | Cakes | 3.1 (±4.3) | 2.3 (±3.3) | 0.03 (±0.04) | 0.02 (±0.03) |
| Non-alcoholic beverages | 2.3 (±1.7) | 1.7 (±1.4) | 0.02 (±0.02) | 0.02 (±0.01) | Potato | 3.1 (±2.5) | 2.3 (±1.8) | 0.03 (±0.02) | 0.02 (±0.02) |
Table 4.
Top 15 food group intake for Māori and non-Māori men low and adequate protein intake based on the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR).
Table 4.
Top 15 food group intake for Māori and non-Māori men low and adequate protein intake based on the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR).
| Māori Men | Non-Māori Men | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contribution to Protein Intake (%) | Protein Intake (g/kg/day) | Contribution to Protein Intake (%) | Protein Intake (g/kg/day) | ||||||
| Food Groups | Low protein (≤0.85 g/kg/day) | Adequate protein (>0.86 g/kg/day) | Low protein (≤0.85 g/kg/day) | Adequate protein (>0.86 g/kg/day) | Food Groups | Low protein (≤0.85 g/kg/day) | Adequate protein (>0.86 g/kg/day) | Low protein (≤0.85 g/kg/day) | Adequate protein (>0.86 g/kg/day) |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| Fish, seafood | 10.9 (±17.0) | 11.2 (±17.5) | 0.11 (±0.17) | 0.11 (±0.18) | Beef, veal | 11.1 (±13.3) | 13.9 (±16.3) | 0.11 (±0.13) | 0.14 (±0.16) |
| Poultry | 6.6 (±10.7) | 10.4 (±16.9) | 0.07 (±0.11) | 0.10 (±0.17) | Bread | 13.8 (±8.3) | 11.0 (±6.2) | 0.14 (±0.08) | 0.11 (±0.06) |
| Beef, veal | 12.0 (±18.2) | 9.5 (±13.7) | 0.12 (±0.18) | 0.10 (±0.14) | Milk | 12.6 (±8.9) | 10.0 (±7.0) | 0.13 (±0.09) | 0.10 (±0.07) |
| Pork | 6.8 (±11.0) | 9.0 (±15.5) | 0.07 (±0.11) | 0.09 (±0.16) | Poultry | 2.7 (±6.8) | 9.8 (±14.9) | 0.03 (±0.07) | 0.10 (±0.15) |
| Bread | 11.7 (±8.5) | 8.8 (±5.7) | 0.12 (±0.08) | 0.09 (±0.06) | Fish, seafood | 4.6 (±8.2) | 8.0 (±11.8) | 0.05 (±0.08) | 0.08 (±0.12) |
| Milk | 9.8 (±7.4) | 7.5 (±5.8) | 0.10 (±0.07) | 0.07 (±0.06) | Cereals | 6.4 (±4.3) | 5.4 (±3.6) | 0.06 (±0.04) | 0.05 (±0.04) |
| Mutton (Sheep, lamb) | 0.2 (±0.7) | 5.9 (±14.7) | 0.00 (±0.01) | 0.06 (±0.15) | Pork | 5.2 (±8.1) | 4.3 (±8.9) | 0.05 (±0.08) | 0.04 (±0.09) |
| Cereals | 5.5 (±4.2) | 4.5 (±3.7) | 0.06 (±0.04) | 0.04 (±0.04) | Cheese | 3.3 (±5.3) | 4.1 (±5.3) | 0.03 (±0.05) | 0.04 (±0.05) |
| Egg, egg dishes | 3.0 (±6.4) | 4.1 (±5.1) | 0.03 (±0.06) | 0.04 (±0.05) | Vegetables | 3.9 (±4.1) | 3.8 (±2.5) | 0.04 (±0.04) | 0.04 (±0.02) |
| Sausage, processed meats | 3.6 (±9.9) | 3.3 (±8.2) | 0.04 (±0.10) | 0.03 (±0.08) | Egg, egg dishes | 4.1 (±7.0) | 3.2 (±4.7) | 0.04 (±0.07) | 0.03 (±0.05) |
| Vegetables | 3.5 (±2.4) | 3.3 (±2.6) | 0.03 (±0.02) | 0.03 (±0.03) | Potato | 3.6 (±2.5) | 3.0 (±1.9) | 0.04 (±0.02) | 0.03 (±0.02) |
| Potato | 3.5 (±3.3) | 3.0 (±1.8) | 0.03 (±0.03) | 0.03 (±0.02) | Mutton (Sheep, lamb) | 1.0 (±4.5) | 2.8 (±8.0) | 0.01 (±0.04) | 0.03 (±0.08) |
| Cheese | 2.5 (±4.4) | 2.1 (±4.1) | 0.02 (±0.04) | 0.02 (±0.04) | Cakes | 1.9 (±3.6) | 2.4 (±3.2) | 0.02 (±0.04) | 0.02 (±0.03) |
| Cakes | 2.6 (±4.1) | 1.9 (±2.8) | 0.03 (±0.04) | 0.02 (±0.03) | Pies, pasties | 3.4 (±8.2) | 2.2 (±5.2) | 0.03 (±0.08) | 0.02 (±0.05) |
| Non-alcoholic beverages | 1.8 (±1.1) | 1.8 (±2.3) | 0.02 (±0.01) | 0.02 (±0.02) | Sausage, processed meats | 2.7 (±6.9) | 2.0 (±5.3) | 0.03 (±0.07) | 0.02 (±0.05) |
Table 5.
Reduced multivariate regression model predicts protein intake in grams per kilogram per day.
Table 5.
Reduced multivariate regression model predicts protein intake in grams per kilogram per day.
| Effect | Gender | Estimate | Standard Error | p > (t) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.7720 | 0.8056 | 0.0283 | |
| Age (Years) | −0.01198 | 0.009609 | 0.2131 | |
| Gender | Men | 0.09068 | 0.03057 | 0.0032 |
| Women | 0 | - | - | |
| Ethnicity | Non-Māori | 0.01965 | 0.03926 | 0.6169 |
| Māori | 0 | - | - | |
| Depression | No | 0.09467 | 0.04314 | 0.0287 |
| Yes | 0 | - | - | |
| SF-12 Physical Health Score | 0.001965 | 0.001450 | 0.1761 |
Reduced multivariate regression model was built to predict protein intake in g/kg/day. All variables not significant to p-value of <0.2 were removed except for age and ethnicity. Depression and being a woman were predicted to contribute to having lower protein intake in g/kg/day.
Table 6.
Logistic regression model to predict meeting the EAR for protein in grams per kilogram per day.
Table 6.
Logistic regression model to predict meeting the EAR for protein in grams per kilogram per day.
| Odds Ratio Estimates | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | Point Estimate | 95% Wald Confidence Limits | p-Value | ||
| Age | (one year greater) | 1.079 | 0.943 | 1.234 | 0.2697 |
| Gender | Men vs Women | 0.759 | 0.484 | 1.191 | 0.2307 |
| Ethnicity | Non-Māori vs Māori | 1.360 | 0.764 | 2.418 | 0.2958 |
| Practical support available | No vs. Yes | 1.245 | 0.552 | 2.808 | 0.5972 |
| Depression | No vs. Yes | 1.415 | 0.726 | 2.756 | 0.3078 |
| Living alone | No vs. Yes | 0.958 | 0.610 | 1.502 | 0.8505 |
| NZ Deprivation score | 1–4 vs. 8–10 | 0.855 | 0.485 | 1.510 | 0.3806 |
| 5–7 vs. 8–10 | 1.261 | 0.768 | 2.071 | ||
| Wear dentures | No vs. Full | 1.335 | 0.763 | 2.336 | 0.0362 |
| Partial vs. Full | 1.948 | 1.170 | 3.244 | ||
| Swallowing problems | Never vs. Often or always | 0.835 | 0.245 | 2.855 | 0.8244 |
| Rarely vs. Often or always | 0.924 | 0.208 | 4.101 | ||
| Sometimes vs. Often or always | 0.615 | 0.155 | 2.435 | ||
| Chewing problems | Never vs. Often or always | 1.835 | 0.684 | 4.927 | 0.5193 |
| Rarely vs. Often or always | 2.724 | 0.677 | 10.965 | ||
| Sometimes vs. Often or always | 1.599 | 0.528 | 4.842 | ||
| SF-12 Physical Health Score | (one point greater) | 1.009 | 0.988 | 1.032 | 0.4004 |
| SF-12 Mental Health Score | (one point greater) | 1.003 | 0.975 | 1.031 | 0.8527 |
| Pension only income | No vs. Yes | 1.066 | 0.679 | 1.673 | 0.7818 |
Logistic regression model meeting protein intake based on Estimated Average Requirements (EAR) in g/kg/day. p-value of <0.2 was significant.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ram, A.; Kerse, N.; Moyes, S.A.; Muru-Lanning, M.; Wham, C. Dietary Protein Intake and Determinants in Māori and Non-Māori Octogenarians. Te Puāwaitanga o Ngā Tapuwae Kia Ora Tonu: Life and Living in Advanced Age: A Cohort Study in New Zealand. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072079
AMA Style
Ram A, Kerse N, Moyes SA, Muru-Lanning M, Wham C. Dietary Protein Intake and Determinants in Māori and Non-Māori Octogenarians. Te Puāwaitanga o Ngā Tapuwae Kia Ora Tonu: Life and Living in Advanced Age: A Cohort Study in New Zealand. Nutrients. 2020; 12(7):2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072079
Chicago/Turabian StyleRam, Anishka, Ngaire Kerse, Simon A. Moyes, Marama Muru-Lanning, and Carol Wham. 2020. "Dietary Protein Intake and Determinants in Māori and Non-Māori Octogenarians. Te Puāwaitanga o Ngā Tapuwae Kia Ora Tonu: Life and Living in Advanced Age: A Cohort Study in New Zealand" Nutrients 12, no. 7: 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072079
APA StyleRam, A., Kerse, N., Moyes, S. A., Muru-Lanning, M., & Wham, C. (2020). Dietary Protein Intake and Determinants in Māori and Non-Māori Octogenarians. Te Puāwaitanga o Ngā Tapuwae Kia Ora Tonu: Life and Living in Advanced Age: A Cohort Study in New Zealand. Nutrients, 12(7), 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072079
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
