Next Article in Journal
Relationship between Eating Habits, Physical Activity and Tobacco and Alcohol Use in Pregnant Women: Sociodemographic Inequalities
Previous Article in Journal
Maximizing the Estrogenic Potential of Soy Isoflavones through the Gut Microbiome: Implication for Cardiometabolic Health in Postmenopausal Women
Previous Article in Special Issue
Life before and after COVID-19: The ‘New Normal’ Benefits the Regularity of Daily Sleep and Eating Routines among College Students
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/nu14030556
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interaction between Lifestyle Changes and PNPLA3 Genotype in NAFLD Patients during the COVID-19 Lockdown

by
Felice Cinque
1,2,
Annalisa Cespiati
1,2,
Rosa Lombardi
1,2,*,
Andrea Costantino
2,3,
Gabriele Maffi
1,2,
Francesca Alletto
1,2,
Lucia Colavolpe
1,2,
Paolo Francione
1,2,
Giovanna Oberti
1,2,
Erika Fatta
1,
Cristina Bertelli
1,
Giordano Sigon
1,2,
Paola Dongiovanni
1,
Maurizio Vecchi
2,3,
Silvia Fargion
1,2 and
Anna Ludovica Fracanzani
1,2
1
Unit of Internal Medicine and Metabolic Disease, Fondazione Ca’ Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
3
Unit of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Fondazione Ca’ Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(3), 556; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030556
Submission received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 18 January 2022 / Accepted: 25 January 2022 / Published: 27 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exercise and Nutrition in COVID-19)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown dramatically changed people’s lifestyles. Diet, physical activity, and the PNPLA3 gene are known risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Aim: To evaluate changes in metabolic and hepatic disease in NAFLD patients after the COVID-19 lockdown. Three hundred and fifty seven NAFLD patients were enrolled, all previously instructed to follow a Mediterranean diet (MD). Anthropometric, metabolic, and laboratory data were collected before the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy and 6 months apart, along with ultrasound (US) steatosis grading and information about adherence to MD and physical activity (PA). In 188 patients, PNPLA3 genotyping was performed. After the lockdown, 48% of patients gained weight, while 16% had a worsened steatosis grade. Weight gain was associated with poor adherence to MD (p = 0.005), reduced PA (p = 0.03), and increased prevalence of PNPLA3 GG (p = 0.04). At multivariate analysis (corrected for age, sex, MD, PA, and PNPLA3 GG), only PNPLA3 remained independently associated with weight gain (p = 0.04), which was also associated with worsened glycemia (p = 0.002) and transaminases (p = 0.02). During lockdown, due to a dramatic change in lifestyles, half of our cohort of NAFLD patients gained weight, with a worsening of metabolic and hepatologic features. Interestingly, the PNPLA3 GG genotype nullified the effect of lifestyle and emerged as an independent risk factor for weight gain, opening new perspectives in NAFLD patient care.

1. Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined by the presence of fat in more than 5% of hepatocytes in the absence of other causes of liver disease [1]. The term NAFLD encloses a spectrum of different conditions, ranging from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis (NASH) where inflammation coexists, possibly evolving to fibrosis and cirrhosis. Metabolic alterations, mostly type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and obesity [2,3], as well as genetic predisposition, especially polymorphism in the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) gene [4,5,6,7], are risk factors for NAFLD onset and progression towards advanced liver disease.
The first line and most effective treatment for both metabolic syndrome (MeTS) and NAFLD is weight loss, achieved by diet and physical exercise [8,9]. Weight loss, especially if >5–10% from baseline, promotes improvement in hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis [10]. On the other hand, weight gain increases the risk of advanced liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [9,11]. The most recommended diet regimen in patients with NAFLD is the Mediterranean diet (MD) [12,13,14,15,16], characterized by reduced daily intake of carbohydrates (30% of the whole daily caloric intake, preferably whole grain) and high fat consumption (35–45% of the total energy intake), mainly mono-unsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)—coming from olive oil, nuts, and fish—with a low intake of saturated fatty acids (<8% of total daily calories) [17]. Sugary drinks and high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) content foods are forbidden; conversely, increased amounts of fibers found in vegetables, legumes, and whole grains are recommended [18]. A small amount of alcohol consumption, below 30 g/day in men and 20 g/day in women, is permitted [9]. Regarding physical activity (PA), patients with NAFLD are encouraged to perform at least 150 min/week of moderate intensity physical activity over three to five sessions, combining both aerobic and resistance training [19,20,21,22,23].
In December 2019, a viral infection sustained by a novel coronavirus family, named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and called COVID-19, was described in China [24] and subsequently spread across the world, with the World Health Organization (WHO) declaring it a pandemic in March 2020. Because of a high rate of morbidity and mortality, many countries imposed quarantine policies in order to control the spread of the infection [25]. Italy imposed a nation-wide lockdown from March to April 2020.
If, on the one hand, these measures were highly effective in containing the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, on the other hand, they limited outdoor activities and promoted smart working at home, with consequent changes in social and dietary habits [26]. As a consequence of the lockdown, weight gain in the general population [27,28] has been described, as well as deterioration in glycemic control in patients with T2DM [29,30,31].
Given the close association between NAFLD, weight gain, and metabolic alterations, and the lack of data in the literature on the impact of the lockdown on NAFLD patients, the aim of our study was to evaluate changes in hepatic and metabolic features in a cohort of Italian NAFLD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also investigated the impact of the PNPLA3 genotype on the effect of lifestyle changes in the same cohort.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

We performed a retrospective study in a cohort of 357 patients (mean age was 61 ± 12 years, 67% male) with a diagnosis of NAFLD, according to the European Study of Liver Disease (EASL) criteria [9], who were referred to the Metabolic and Liver Disease outpatient clinic of the Fondazione Ca’ Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, in Milan, Italy. Enrolled patients had one medical checkup between June and October 2020, and all previous checkups had been performed no more than 6 months before the COVID-19 lockdown. For all patients, anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical data and assessment of lifestyle were collected at the two visits. Patients with HCC or decompensated cirrhosis were excluded from the study. None of the patients had had a COVID-19 infection that required hospitalization. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. For all patients, informed consent to participate to the study was obtained according to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Assessment of Dietary Habits and Lifestyle

As for our routine clinical practice, assessment of adherence to the MD and PA, along with smoking habits and alcohol consumption, were performed at each follow-up visit, so this information was collected before and after the COVID-19 lockdown. In particular, at all visits, patients’ dietary habits were compared to a balanced MD: patients were considered adherent to the MD if they consumed low carbohydrates (30% of the whole daily calories intake, preferably whole grain) and low saturated fat (<8% of total energy intake), while consuming a high proportion of mono-unsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated acid (30–40% of energy intake), with no consumption of sugary drinks nor high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) content foods. PA was evaluated by asking patients the type and amount of PA they performed. Patients were classified in the aerobic PA group if they performed an aerobic PA of at least 150–300 min of moderate intensity or of 75–150 min a week of vigorous intensity; conversely, they were included in the resistance PA if they performed a series of 8–10 whole-body exercises (exercises involving each major muscle group) at least twice a week for 60 min during each session [32]. Patients performing either aerobic PA or resistance PA were classified as physically active, otherwise they were considered inactive.

2.3. Assessment of Metabolic Comorbidities

Normal weight, overweight, and obesity were defined by the body mass index (BMI) values of <25, 25–29, and ≥30 kg/m2. Patients presenting with in-office blood pressure values ≥140/90 mmHg or who used any antihypertensive drugs [33] were considered hypertensive. Dyslipidemia was defined by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >100 mg/dL and/or triglycerides >150 mg/dL and/or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol <40 mg/dL for men and 50 mg/dL for women and/or use of lipid-lowering drugs [34]. T2DM was diagnosed by the presence of fasting glucose >126 mg/dL in more than two consecutive measurements or a single value >200 mg/dL or a glycated hemoglobin (Hb1Ac) >6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or therapy with any hypoglycemic drugs [35], as well as retrieved by medical history. Blood samples were obtained after a fasting night. The biochemical panel included a glucose-and-lipids profile.

2.4. Assessment of Liver Disease

According to local laboratory cut-offs, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥39 U/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥41 U/L and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) ≥61 UI for men and >36 UI/L for women were considered increased values. The presence and grade of hepatic steatosis was evaluated by ultrasound (US), according to the literature [36,37,38]. The presence and severity of hepatic fibrosis were detected by non-invasive fibrosis score (Fibrosis-4 (FIB4) score). Cut-offs of 1.3 and 2.67 were used to rule-out and rule-in fibrosis, respectively [39]. In a subset of 80 patients, a previous liver biopsy was available.

2.5. Genetic Analysis

Data about the rs738409 C > G (I148M PNPLA3) single nucleotide polymorphism by TaqMan 5′-nuclease assays (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were available in 188 patients.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as means ± SD or medians (interquartile range) for normally and not normally distributed variables, respectively. Categorical variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies (n, %). In order to compare differences between groups, we used the chi-squared test for categorical variables and the unpaired Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon test for continuous ones, according to data distribution. To evaluate changes in metabolic and lifestyle variables before and after lockdown, a paired t-test and the independent sample proportions were used for continuous and categorical variables. A multivariable logistic regression analyses was performed to evaluate factors associated to increased weight after lockdown, adjusted for confounding factors (age, sex, MD, and PA during lock-down and PNPLA3 genotype) and tested, assuming an additive model. A two-tailed p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP 15.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Anthropometric and Lifestyle Characteristics at Pre-Lockdown Visit

Thirty-nine (11%) patients were current smokers, and 23% used to drink small amounts of alcohol (median alcohol intake 12 (6–18) g/day).
Before the lockdown, in the entire cohort, 186 (56%) patients referred to following a balanced MD, while 128 (37%) referred that they performed regular physical activity (35% aerobic PA and 2% resistance PA).

3.2. Metabolic and Hepatic Features at Pre-Lockdown Visit

The mean body weight was 80 ± 14 Kg, with 52% of patients overweight and 30% obese.
The prevalence of hypertension, T2DM (mean glycemia 106 ± 23 mg/dL), and dyslipidemia (mean LDL 102 ± 33 mg/dL, HDL 50 ± 13 mg/dL; median triglycerides 118 (IQR 90-163) mg/dL) were 55%, 23%, and 53%, respectively.
Increased ALT were observed in 24%, AST in 9%, and GGT in 29%. Grading of steatosis at US showed grade 1 in 44%, grade 2 in 41%, and grade 3 in 15% of patients, whereas advanced fibrosis by non-invasive score FIB-4 was diagnosed in 5% of and ruled out in 51% patients. In the subset of patients with an available liver biopsy (n = 80), NASH was present in 70 (87%) cases, of whom mild fibrosis (F1) was present in 27 (38%), significant fibrosis (F2) in 17 (24%), advanced fibrosis (F3) in 12 (17%), and cirrhosis in 2 (3%).

3.3. Changes in Hepatic and Metabolic Features after Lockdown

After the COVID-19 lockdown, 48% of the cohort (171 patients) had an increase in body weight, with a mean weight gain of 3.2 ± 4 Kg (29% of the cohort with weight gain >5% and 4% >10%). Conversely, in 17% of patients, body weight remained stable, whereas 35% of the cohort lost weight, with a mean weight loss of 2.7 ± 2.7 Kg.
Similarly, in 57 (16%) patients, an increase in steatosis US grade was registered at the post-lockdown visit, without any progression of fibrosis by FIB-4 in the whole cohort (data not shown).
Finally, no change in the prevalence of metabolic alterations (T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) was observed before and after lockdown.

3.4. Factors Determining Weight Gain in the Whole Cohort

As shown in Table 1, during lockdown, patients who gained weight had a significantly reduced adherence to a balanced MD (p = 0.005) and performed reduced PA (p = 0.03) compared to those who did not.
Conversely, no difference in age, sex, prevalence of metabolic comorbidities, and smoking and alcohol habits was found.
Similarly, the severity of liver disease at the baseline did not influence weight gain. Interestingly, patients who increased in body weight had the GG PNPLA3 genotype more frequently than patients who did not (24% vs. 12% p = 0.04).
In order to differentiate the impact on the weight gain of lifestyle changes and genetic factors—alone (Table 2, model 1, 2, 3) or in combination (Table 2, model 4, 5)—a multivariate analysis corrected for age and sex was performed. When analyzed alone, both lifestyle changes (adherence to MD, OR 0.52, CI 95% 0.34–0.82 p = 0.004; PA, OR 0.6, CI 95% 0.37–0.95 p = 0.03) and genetic factors (PNPLA3 homozygosity for the G allele, OR 2.4, CI 95% 1.08–5.32, p = 0.03) resulted as independent risk factors for weight gain. Analyzing adherence to MD and PA together (Table 2, model 4), both variables (OR 0.54, CI 95% 0.34–0.87 p = 0.01; OR 0.58, CI 95% 0.35–0.96 p = 0.03) were independently associated with weight gain. When considering the coexistence of the three variables—MD adherence, PA, and PNPLA3GG—(Table 2, model 5) only the PNPLA3 GG genotype (OR 2.391, CI 95% 1.02–5.58; p = 0.04) remained significantly associated with weight gain.
BMI, body mass index. T2DM, type 2 diabetes. US, ultrasound. FIB-4, fibrosis 4 score. NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. MD, Mediterranean diet. PA, physical activity.

3.5. Impact of Lockdown on Lifestyle, Metabolic, and Hepatic Features in the Entire Cohort According to Weight Gain

As shown in Table 3, adherence to MD remained stable and low in the whole cohort before and after lockdown, irrespective of the body weight change. Conversely, a lower adherence to PA was significantly evident in the subset of patients who gained weight (35% vs. 25%, p = 0.02), without any modification in those who did not.
In addition, the prevalence of metabolic alterations (i.e., T2DM, hypertension and dyslipidemia) did not change before and after lockdown, irrespective of weight change.
Conversely, as for biochemical metabolic parameters, significantly higher glycemia levels were registered after lockdown only in patients who gained weight (112 ± 32 vs. 106 ± 25, p = 0.002), without any change in lipids.
On the contrary, no change in all biochemical parameters was observed in patients who maintained a stable weight during the lockdown period.
As for liver disease, a higher prevalence of steatosis grade ≥2 after the lockdown was registered in patients who gained weight (73% vs. 59%, p = 0.002) but not in those who did not (56% vs. 52%, p = 0.21), without any worsening of fibrosis by FIB-4 in both groups. In addition, a higher prevalence of increased transaminases and GGT was observed after the lockdown only among those who gained weight (ALT 30% vs. 21% p = 0.02; GGT 35% vs. 25%, p = 0.01).

3.6. Role of Age

Given the change also in working habits during lockdown and considering the retirement age in Italy, which is approximately 67 years old, we divided our cohort in younger patients (222 subjects < 67 years old, 71% male) and older ones (135 subjects ≥ 67 years old, 62% male).
Differences between groups are described in Supplementary Table S1. In particular, before the lockdown, both groups had similar rates of adherence to MD and PA (56% vs. 54%, p = 1.00 and 38% vs. 35%, p = 0.57, respectively).
Analyzing modifications in lifestyle, metabolic, and hepatic features before and after the lockdown, according to age (i.e., < or >67 ys) and in patients who gained weight compared to those who did not (Supplementary Table S2), both younger and older subjects showed a reduced adherence to MD (patients with age <67 ys: 44% vs. 58%, p = 0.001, patients with age >67 ys: 49% vs. 65%, p = 0.03). Interestingly, younger patients who increased in weight had a significantly reduced PA during lockdown (23% vs. 40%, p = 0.002), while older patients did not show a reduction in PA (32% vs. 28%, p = 0.59).
No change in the prevalence of metabolic comorbidities was registered before and after lockdown, irrespective of age and weight change. Conversely, an increase in glycemia levels (109 ± 32 vs. 103 ± 23, p = 0.04) was observed after lockdown in younger patients who increased in weight but not in those who did not gain weight, while biochemical parameters remained stable in older subjects, irrespectively of weight change.
As for liver disease, hepatic features worsened only in the groups who gained weight. In particular, a higher prevalence of US hepatic steatosis grade ≥2 was observed after the lockdown in older patients (64% vs. 46%, p = 0.007), whereas a higher prevalence of increased liver enzyme was seen in younger patients (increased ALT 38% vs. 25%, p = 0.005, AST 15% vs. 9%, p = 0.05, GGT 38% vs. 28%, p = 0.02). No worsening of fibrosis by FIB-4 was observed across all groups.

4. Discussion

In this retrospective study, we demonstrated the negative impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on NAFLD because of worsening lifestyle habits, which play a key role in the therapy for these patients. In addition, we showed an independent association between the PNPLA3 GG genotype and weight gain.
Almost half of the cohort increased in weight, with up to 29% of patients gaining more than 5% of their basal weight. Worsening of steatosis was detected in 16% of the cohort, while no change in fibrosis was seen, probably because the time that elapsed between the two follow-up visits was too short. Indeed, modification of lifestyle was the main driver of weight gain, since both the reduction in physical activity (significantly reduced after lockdown) and a low adherence to the Mediterranean diet (around 50%) were independent risk factors for it. Worthy of note, the PNPLA3 GG genotype seemed to be the most important determinant of weight gain, and, interestingly, in patients carrying PNPLA3 GG allele, the impact of lifestyle was almost nullified, with the genetic polymorphism being the strongest predictor.
Lifestyle interventions, including a correct MD and regular PA with weight loss, represent the sole approved treatment for NAFLD [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47], being strongly recommended in both European and American guidelines for NAFLD treatment [1,9]. Our results parallel those of other studies in which quarantine measures with consequent reduced PA and poor dietary habits led to an increase in body weight in the general population [27,28], obese patients [48], and diabetic outpatients [49,50]. One study including few patients reported weight gain in NAFLD subjects after lockdown [51], but results were based only on a self-administered questionnaire. Therefore, to our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in a large cohort of ultrasound-proven NAFLD patients, with an extensive evaluation of hepatic and metabolic alterations.
We demonstrated an independent association between the PNPLA3 GG genotype and weight gain, irrespective of unhealthy lifestyle habits. PNPLA3, expressed both in hepatocytes and adipocytes, has a role in lipid droplets storage [52]. PNPLA3 GG allelic expression is known for conferring an augmented risk of development and severity of NALFD [7,53,54] and seems to modify the impact of different therapeutic strategies for NAFLD [55]. In addition, PNPLA3 has been reported [52,56,57,58] to influence the accumulation of fat in adipose tissue and dietary changes—especially increased carbohydrates consumption [59]—may modulate its expression, possibly explaining the role of PNPLA3 in weight gain. Moreover, lower levels of adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory cytokine inversely associated with NAFLD, insulin-resistance, and impairment in glucose and lipid metabolism [60], have been found in both PNPLA3 GG subjects and obese patients, even without NAFLD [61]. Focusing on the impact of the PNPLA3 genotype on lifestyle interventions in NAFLD patients, one study showed that mutated patients were more sensitive to the beneficial effect of lifestyle modification on steatosis reduction, rather than wildtype patients [62]. Another study comparing the effect of a dietary intervention between subjects with PNPLA3 GG genotype and wildtype ones has demonstrated that mutated patients exhibited a greater weight loss and, as a consequence, a greater reduction in liver steatosis compared to not mutated ones [63]. Further studies that aim to confirm the role of PNPLA3 in weight gain and to compare weight change after physical activity in patients after lockdown according to PNPLA3 genotype are warranted.
Despite the fact that the mean weight gain was only 3 kg, a worsening of hepatic steatosis was demonstrated. In addition, high rates of reduced glycemic control and transaminases derangement were observed after lockdown in patients who increased their weight. Indeed, an impairment in glucose control during the COVID-19 pandemic was already reported in diabetic patients, and, similar to our data, it was caused by a change in diet and physical activity [29,30,31,64]. Conversely, no data are available in the literature on the worsening in transaminases after the COVID-19 lockdown, particularly in NAFLD patients. Therefore, it is important to stress that weight control in patients with NAFLD is essential in order to prevent worsening of the liver and metabolic control.
Finally, the present study shows that the lockdown had a different impact on patients’ lifestyle depending on age. In fact, in patients who gained weight, along with reduced adherence to MD of the whole cohort, the impact of reduced physical activity was mainly evident in younger patients (i.e., <67 years) compared to older ones. This could be possibly explained by the dramatic change in daily routines, which prevalently concerned younger patients, more likely to be active workers forced to smart working at home and with reduced chances of performing regular outdoor physical activity.
Our study has some limitations. First of all, the retrospective nature of the study prevents us from drawing a definite causative effect between change in lifestyle during lockdown and the worsening of metabolic and liver control, although similar results in different cohorts of patients have been reported. Moreover, regarding the assessment of lifestyle, no standardized quantitative questionnaires were administrated for the evaluation of dietary habits. However, accurate dietary counseling was provided to all patients, and, most importantly, adherence to MD was assessed at each visit. Finally, the PNPLA3 genetic characterization was available in a subset of patients (188 subjects), and, despite the need for further studies involving a larger cohort to further investigate the impact of PNPLA3 on weight gain, our data seem consistent with literature.

5. Conclusions

We demonstrated for the first time that the COVID-19 lockdown had a dramatic negative impact in the NAFLD population, leading to weight gain and the worsening of steatosis, consequent to a deterioration of healthy lifestyle habits. Most interestingly, a role for PNPLA3 emerged as a key independent risk factor for weight gain, opening new perspectives in the risk stratification and follow-up of NAFLD patients, especially in patients who could not regularly attend the hepatology clinic. Indeed, the COVID-19 pandemic possibly highlighted the need for reconsideration of the modality of assistance to NAFLD patients in the achievement of an appropriate lifestyle. In fact, the European Society for the Study of the Liver (EASL), in its position article on the care of hepatologic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic [65], has also underscored the need to continue to follow standard care of NAFLD outpatients during pandemic emergencies, possibly also using telemedicine, which is emerging as a good strategy to improve patient follow up [66,67].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14030556/s1; Table S1: Lifestyle and metabolic features before lockdown, according to age (< or > 67 years).; Table S2: Differences in lifestyle, metabolic features, and laboratory data before and after the lockdown, according to weight change and age (< or ≥67 years).

Author Contributions

F.C. collected data and prepared the full manuscript. A.C. (Annalisa Cespiati) and R.L. were involved in the analysis and interpretation of data. E.F., P.F., G.O., G.M., F.A., L.C., G.S., and A.C. (Andrea Costantino) were involved in the acquisition of data. C.B. provided ultrasound data and P.D. genetic data. S.F., M.V., R.L., and A.L.F. were involved in the critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fondazione Ca’ Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chalasani, N.; Younossi, Z.; Lavine, J.E.; Diehl, A.M.; Brunt, E.M.; Cusi, K.; Charlton, M.; Sanyal, A.J. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 2012, 55, 2005–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Younossi, Z.M.; Koenig, A.B.; Abdelatif, D.; Fazel, Y.; Henry, L.; Wymer, M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016, 64, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dietrich, P.; Hellerbrand, C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2014, 28, 637–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dongiovanni, P.; Donati, B.; Fares, R.; Lombardi, R.; Mancina, R.M.; Romeo, S.; Valenti, L. PNPLA3 I148M polymorphism and progressive liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 6969–6978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Romeo, S.; Kozlitina, J.; Xing, C.; Pertsemlidis, A.; Cox, D.; Pennacchio, L.A.; Boerwinkle, E.; Cohen, J.C.; Hobbs, H.H. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1461–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Anstee, Q.M.; Day, C.P. The genetics of NAFLD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.L.; Patman, G.L.; Leathart, J.B.; Piguet, A.C.; Burt, A.D.; Dufour, J.F.; Day, C.P.; Daly, A.K.; Reeves, H.L.; Anstee, Q.M. Carriage of the PNPLA3 rs738409 C >G polymorphism confers an increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2014, 61, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Romero-Gómez, M.; Zelber-Sagi, S.; Trenell, M. Treatment of NAFLD with diet, physical activity and exercise. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 829–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, 1388–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vilar-Gomez, E.; Martinez-Perez, Y.; Calzadilla-Bertot, L.; Torres-Gonzalez, A.; Gra-Oramas, B.; Gonzalez-Fabian, L.; Friedman, S.L.; Diago, M.; Romero-Gomez, M. Weight Loss Through Lifestyle Modification Significantly Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 2015, 149, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, Y.; Chang, Y.; Cho, Y.K.; Ahn, J.; Shin, H.; Ryu, S. Obesity and Weight Gain Are Associated with Progression of Fibrosis in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ryan, M.C.; Itsiopoulos, C.; Thodis, T.; Ward, G.; Trost, N.; Hofferberth, S.; O’Dea, K.; Desmond, P.V.; Johnson, N.A.; Wilson, A.M. The Mediterranean diet improves hepatic steatosis and insulin sensitivity in individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Maskarinec, G.; Lim, U.; Jacobs, S.; Monroe, K.R.; Ernst, T.; Buchthal, S.D.; Shepherd, J.A.; Wilkens, L.R.; Le Marchand, L.; Boushey, C.J. Diet Quality in Midadulthood Predicts Visceral Adiposity and Liver Fatness in Older Ages: The Multiethnic Cohort Study. Obesity 2017, 25, 1442–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, J.; Hennein, R.; Liu, C.; Long, M.T.; Hoffmann, U.; Jacques, P.F.; Lichtenstein, A.H.; Hu, F.B.; Levy, D. Improved Diet Quality Associates with Reduction in Liver Fat, Particularly in Individuals with High Genetic Risk Scores for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gepner, Y.; Shelef, I.; Schwarzfuchs, D.; Zelicha, H.; Tene, L.; Yaskolka Meir, A.; Tsaban, G.; Cohen, N.; Bril, N.; Rein, M.; et al. Effect of Distinct Lifestyle Interventions on Mobilization of Fat. Circulation 2018, 137, 1143–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mazzocchi, A.; Leone, L.; Agostoni, C.; Pali-Schöll, I. The Secrets of the Mediterranean Diet. Does [Only] Olive Oil Matter? Nutrients 2019, 11, 2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Godos, J.; Federico, A.; Dallio, M.; Scazzina, F. Mediterranean diet and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Molecular mechanisms of protection. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 68, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ratziu, V.; Bellentani, S.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Day, C.; Marchesini, G. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J. Hepatol. 2010, 53, 372–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Oh, S.; Shida, T.; Yamagishi, K.; Tanaka, K.; So, R.; Tsujimoto, T.; Shoda, J. Moderate to vigorous physical activity volume is an important factor for managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A retrospective study. Hepatology 2015, 61, 1205–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hallsworth, K.; Fattakhova, G.; Hollingsworth, K.G.; Thoma, C.; Moore, S.; Taylor, R.; Day, C.P.; Trenell, M.I. Resistance exercise reduces liver fat and its mediators in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease independent of weight loss. Gut 2011, 60, 1278–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kistler, K.D.; Brunt, E.M.; Clark, J.M.; Diehl, A.M.; Sallis, J.F.; Schwimmer, J.B.; NASH CRN Research Group. Physical activity recommendations, exercise intensity, and histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 106, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kwak, M.S.; Kim, D.; Chung, G.E.; Kim, W.; Kim, Y.J.; Yoon, J.H. Role of physical activity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in terms of visceral obesity and insulin resistance. Liver Int. 2015, 35, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ryu, S.; Chang, Y.; Jung, H.S.; Yun, K.E.; Kwon, M.J.; Choi, Y.; Kim, C.W.; Cho, J.; Suh, B.S.; Cho, Y.K.; et al. Relationship of sitting time and physical activity with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2015, 63, 1229–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nussbaumer-Streit, B.; Mayr, V.; Dobrescu, A.I.; Chapman, A.; Persad, E.; Klerings, I.; Wagner, G.; Siebert, U.; Ledinger, D.; Zachariah, C.; et al. Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: A rapid review. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 9, CD013574. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bogataj Jontez, N.; Novak, K.; Kenig, S.; Petelin, A.; Jenko Pražnikar, Z.; Mohorko, N. The Impact of COVID-19-Related Lockdown on Diet and Serum Markers in Healthy Adults. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Scarmozzino, F.; Visioli, F. COVID-19 and the Subsequent Lockdown Modified Dietary Habits of Almost Half the Population in an Italian Sample. Foods 2020, 9, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zachary, Z.; Brianna, F.; Brianna, L.; Garrett, P.; Jade, W.; Alyssa, D.; Mikayla, K. Self-quarantine and weight gain related risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 14, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Biancalana, E.; Parolini, F.; Mengozzi, A.; Solini, A. Short-term impact of COVID-19 lockdown on metabolic control of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: A single-centre observational study. Acta Diabetol. 2021, 58, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khare, J.; Jindal, S. Observational study on Effect of Lock Down due to COVID 19 on glycemic control in patients with Diabetes: Experience from Central India. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2020, 14, 1571–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanji, Y.; Sawada, S.; Watanabe, T.; Mita, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Murakami, T.; Metoki, H.; Akai, H. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on glycemic control among outpatients with type 2 diabetes in Japan: A hospital-based survey from a country without lockdown. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2021, 176, 108840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Visseren, F.L.J.; Mach, F.; Smulders, Y.M.; Carballo, D.; Koskinas, K.C.; Bäck, M.; Benetos, A.; Biffi, A.; Boavida, J.M.; Capodanno, D.; et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 3227–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Williams, B.; Mancia, G.; Spiering, W.; Rosei, E.A.; Azizi, M.; Burnier, M.; Clement, D.L.; Coca, A.; de Simone, G.; Dominiczak, A.; et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). G. Ital. Cardiol. 2018, 19 (Suppl. S1), 3S–73S. [Google Scholar]
  34. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002, 106, 3143–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care 2014, 11 (Suppl. S1), S14–S80. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hernaez, R.; Lazo, M.; Bonekamp, S.; Kamel, I.; Brancati, F.L.; Guallar, E.; Clark, J.M. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: A meta-analysis. Hepatology 2011, 54, 1082–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dasarathy, S.; Dasarathy, J.; Khiyami, A.; Joseph, R.; Lopez, R.; McCullough, A.J. Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: A prospective study. J. Hepatol. 2009, 51, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ferraioli, G.; Soares Monteiro, L.B. Ultrasound-based techniques for the diagnosis of liver steatosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 6053–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shah, A.G.; Lydecker, A.; Murray, K.; Tetri, B.N.; Contos, M.J.; Sanyal, A.J.; Nash Clinical Research Network. Comparison of noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 7, 1104–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Promrat, K.; Kleiner, D.E.; Niemeier, H.M.; Jackvony, E.; Kearns, M.; Wands, J.R.; Fava, J.L.; Wing, R.R. Randomized controlled trial testing the effects of weight loss on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2010, 51, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Musso, G.; Cassader, M.; Rosina, F.; Gambino, R. Impact of current treatments on liver disease, glucose metabolism and cardiovascular risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 885–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Younossi, Z.M.; Corey, K.E.; Lim, J.K. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Lifestyle Modification Using Diet and Exercise to Achieve Weight Loss in the Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wong, V.W.; Wong, G.L.; Chan, R.S.; Shu, S.S.; Cheung, B.H.; Li, L.S.; Chim, A.M.; Chan, C.K.; Leung, J.K.; Chu, W.C.; et al. Beneficial effects of lifestyle intervention in non-obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 1349–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Keating, S.E.; Hackett, D.A.; George, J.; Johnson, N.A. Exercise and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 2012, 57, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sullivan, S.; Kirk, E.P.; Mittendorfer, B.; Patterson, B.W.; Klein, S. Randomized trial of exercise effect on intrahepatic triglyceride content and lipid kinetics in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2012, 55, 1738–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Berzigotti, A.; Saran, U.; Dufour, J.F. Physical activity and liver diseases. Hepatology 2016, 63, 1026–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, H.J.; He, J.; Pan, L.L.; Ma, Z.M.; Han, C.K.; Chen, C.S.; Chen, Z.; Han, H.W.; Chen, S.; Sun, Q.; et al. Effects of Moderate and Vigorous Exercise on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2016, 176, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pellegrini, M.; Ponzo, V.; Rosato, R.; Scumaci, E.; Goitre, I.; Benso, A.; Belcastro, S.; Crespi, C.; De Michieli, F.; Ghigo, E.; et al. Changes in Weight and Nutritional Habits in Adults with Obesity during the “Lockdown” Period Caused by the COVID-19 Virus Emergency. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ruissen, M.M.; Regeer, H.; Landstra, C.P.; Schroijen, M.; Jazet, I.; Nijhoff, M.F.; Pijl, H.; Ballieux, B.E.P.B.; Dekkers, O.; Huisman, S.D.; et al. Increased stress, weight gain and less exercise in relation to glycemic control in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2021, 9, e002035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Karatas, S.; Yesim, T.; Beysel, S. Impact of lockdown COVID-19 on metabolic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy people. Prim. Care Diabetes 2021, 15, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shanmugam, H.; Di Ciaula, A.; Di Palo, D.M.; Molina-Molina, E.; Garruti, G.; Faienza, M.F.; vanErpecum, K.; Portincasa, P. Multiplying effects of COVID-19 lockdown on metabolic risk and fatty liver. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 51, e13597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wilson, P.A.; Gardner, S.D.; Lambie, N.M.; Commans, S.A.; Crowther, D.J. Characterization of the human patatin-like phospholipase family. J. Lipid Res. 2006, 47, 1940–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Valenti, L.; Al-Serri, A.; Daly, A.K.; Galmozzi, E.; Rametta, R.; Dongiovanni, P.; Nobili, V.; Mozzi, E.; Roviaro, G.; Vanni, E.; et al. Homozygosity for the patatin-like phospholipase-3/adiponutrin I148M polymorphism influences liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010, 51, 1209–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Eslam, M.; Valenti, L.; Romeo, S. Genetics and epigenetics of NAFLD and NASH: Clinical impact. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, J.Z.; Cao, H.X.; Chen, J.N.; Pan, Q. PNPLA3 rs738409 underlies treatment response in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Clin. Cases 2018, 6, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wieser, V.; Adolph, T.E.; Enrich, B.; Moser, P.; Moschen, A.R.; Tilg, H. Weight loss induced by bariatric surgery restores adipose tissue PNPLA3 expression. Liver Int. 2017, 37, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, Y.; He, S.; Li, J.Z.; Seo, Y.K.; Osborne, T.F.; Cohen, J.C.; Hobbs, H.H. A feed-forward loop amplifies nutritional regulation of PNPLA3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 7892–7897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Graham, S.; Wang, X.; Cai, D.; Huang, M.; Pique-Regi, R.; Dong, X.C.; Chen, Y.E.; Willer, C.; et al. Causal relationships between NAFLD, T2D and obesity have implications for disease subphenotyping. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Davis, J.N.; Lê, K.A.; Walker, R.W.; Vikman, S.; Spruijt-Metz, D.; Weigensberg, M.J.; Allayee, H.; Goran, M.I. Increased hepatic fat in overweight Hispanic youth influenced by interaction between genetic variation in PNPLA3 and high dietary carbohydrate and sugar consumption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 1522–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Yanai, H.; Yoshida, H. Beneficial Effects of Adiponectin on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Atherosclerotic Progression: Mechanisms and Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Valenti, L.; Rametta, R.; Ruscica, M.; Dongiovanni, P.; Steffani, L.; Motta, B.M.; Canavesi, E.; Fracanzani, A.L.; Mozzi, E.; Roviaro, G.; et al. The I148M PNPLA3 polymorphism influences serum adiponectin in patients with fatty liver and healthy controls. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012, 12, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Shen, J.; Wong, G.L.; Chan, H.L.; Chan, R.S.; Chan, H.Y.; Chu, W.C.; Cheung, B.H.; Yeung, D.K.; Li, L.S.; Sea, M.M.; et al. PNPLA3 gene polymorphism and response to lifestyle modification in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 30, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Krawczyk, M.; Stachowska, E.; Milkiewicz, P.; Lammert, F.; Milkiewicz, M. Reduction of Caloric Intake Might Override the Prosteatotic Effects of the PNPLA3 p.I148M and TM6SF2 p.E167K Variants in Patients with Fatty Liver: Ultrasound-Based Prospective Study. Digestion 2016, 93, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tewari, A.; Tewari, V.; Tewari, J. Effect of COVID 19 Lockdown on glycemic parameters in people with type 2 diabetes. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2021, 10, 2529–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Boettler, T.; Newsome, P.N.; Mondelli, M.U.; Maticic, M.; Cordero, E.; Cornberg, M.; Berg, T. Care of patients with liver disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: EASL-ESCMID position paper. JHEP Rep. 2020, 2, 100113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Costantino, A.; Bortoluzzi, F.; Giuffrè, M.; Vassallo, R.; Montalbano, L.M.; Monica, F.; Canova, D.; Checchin, D.; Fedeli, P.; Marmo, R.; et al. Correct use of telemedicine in gastroenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the Italian association of hospital gastroenterologists and endoscopists (AIGO). Dig. Liver Dis. 2021, 53, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Saokaew, S.; Kanchanasurakit, S.; Kositamongkol, C.; Chaiyo, K.; Jirapisut, T.; Aomsin, N.; Leewongsakorn, P.; Chaiyakunapruk, N.; Phisalprapa, P. Effects of Telemedicine on Obese Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 723790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Univariate analysis of factors determining weight gain in the entire cohort.
Table 1. Univariate analysis of factors determining weight gain in the entire cohort.
VariableNot Increased Weight
(N = 186)		Increased Weight
(N = 171)		p Value
Baseline Characteristics
Sex, male, n (%)130 (70)108 (63)0.21
Age, ys62 ± 1361 ± 110.29
Current smokers, n (%)20 (11)19 (11)0.75
Light Drinkers, n (%)
Alcohol intake, g/day		48 (26)
12 (6–22.5)		31 (18)
9 (6–12)		0.26
0.08
BMI, kg/m2
➢ Normal weight
➢ Overweight
➢ Obese		28.3 ± 3.9
32 (17)
102 (55)
52 (28)		28.5 ± 4.7
33 (19)
82 (48)
56 (33)		0.77
0.41
Hypertension, n (%)102 (55)94 (55)1.00
T2DM, n (%)41 (22)43 (25)0.62
Dyslipidaemia, n (%)97 (52)92 (54)0.91
US steatosis
➢ 1, n (%)
➢ 2, n (%)
➢ 3, n (%)		 
87 (47)
71 (39)
28 (15)		 
70 (41)
75 (44)
26 (15)		0.37
FIB-4 <1.3, n (%)78 (42)77 (45)0.65
FIB-4 >2.67, n (%)6 (3)8 (5)0.59
Presence of NASH 1, n (%)31 (17)39 (23)0.11
PNPLA3 2
➢ GG, n (%)
➢ CG + CC, n (%)		 
11 (12)
81 (88)		 
23 (24)
73 (76)		0.04
Lifestyle During Lockdown
Balanced MD, n (%)100 (54)72 (42)0.005
Regular PA, n (%)67 (36)43 (25)0.03
Analysis adjusted for sex, age, balanced diet, regular physical activity during lockdown and PNPLA3 genotype. 1 NASH present in 70 patients, out of 80 biopsies available. 2 Data available in 188 patients (of which 92 did not increase weight, while 96 increased weight after lockdown).
Table
Table 2. Multivariate analysis of factors associated to weight gain in the entire cohort.
Table 2. Multivariate analysis of factors associated to weight gain in the entire cohort.
VariableORCI 95%p Value
MODEL 1, Analysis adjusted for age, sex, and diet during lockdown
Age0.990.97–1.010.18
Sex male0.730.45–1.180.19
MD during lockdown0.530.34–0.820.004
MODEL 2, Analysis adjusted for age, sex, and physical activity during lockdown
Age0.990.97–1.010.11
Sex male0.750.47–1.180.21
PA during lockdown0.600.37–0.950.03
MODEL 3, Analysis adjusted for age, sex, and PNPLA3
Age1.010.98–1.020.98
Sex male1.110.58–2.150.75
PNPLA3 GG2.41.08–5.320.03
MODEL 4, Analysis adjusted for age, sex, diet during lockdown, and physical activity during lockdown
Age0.980.97–1.010.10
Sex male0.770.47–1.250.28
MD during lockdown0.540.34–0.870.01
PA during lockdown0.580.35–0.960.03
MODEL 5, Analysis adjusted for age, sex, diet during lockdown, physical activity during lockdown, and PNPLA3
Age1.000.97–1.020.83
Sex male0.860.42–1.760.68
MD during lockdown0.590.31–1.130.11
PA during lockdown0.680.35–1.300.24
PNPLA3 GG2.3911.02–5.580.04
MD, Mediterranean diet. PA, physical activity.
Table
Table 3. Differences in metabolic and hepatic features after lockdown in the entire cohort according to weight gain.
Table 3. Differences in metabolic and hepatic features after lockdown in the entire cohort according to weight gain.
Patients without Increased Weight
N = 186		Patients with Increased Weight
N = 171
VariableBefore LockdownAfter Lockdownp ValueBefore LockdownAfter Lockdownp Value
Lifestyle
MD, n (%)91 (49)100 (54)0.2494 (55)72 (42)0.91
PA, n (%)65 (35)67 (36)0.8860 (35)43 (25)0.02
Metabolic Features
T2DM, n (%)41 (22)41 (22)1.0043 (25)43 (25)1.00
Hypertension, n (%)102 (55)106 (57)0.0894 (55)94 (55)1.00
Dislipidemia, n (%)97 (52)100 (54)0.1692 (54)96 (56)0.05
Glycemia, mg/dL106 ± 22104 ± 210.13106 ± 25112 ± 320.002
HDL cholesterol mg/dL49 ± 1349 ± 130.9451 ± 1451 ± 150.22
LDL cholesterol mg/dL103 ± 97105 ± 350.78100 ± 31104 ± 340.18
Triglycerides mg/dL122 (93–164)121 (94–151)0.07114 (89–160)117 (95–162)0.40
Liver Disease
Increased ALT, n (%)50 (27)41 (22)0.0936 (21)51 (30)0.02
Increased AST, n (%)19 (10)20 (11)1.0015 (9)20 (12)0.16
Increased GGT, n (%)63 (34)58 (31)1.0043 (25)60 (35)0.01
US steatosis
➢ 0–1, n (%)
➢ 2–3, n (%)		 
89 (48)
97 (52)		 
81 (44)
105 (56)		0.21 
70 (41)
101 (59)		 
53 (31)
118 (69)		0.002
FIB-41.31 (0.95–1.73)1.29 (1.01–1.82)0.111.28 (0.89–1.64)1.28 (0.95–1.67)0.13
FIB-4 < 1.3, n (%)78 (42)80 (43)1.0077 (45)79 (46)0.32
FIB-4 > 2.67, n (%)6 (3)9 (5)0.168 (5)8 (5)1.00
MD, Mediterranean diet. PA, physical activity. T2DM, type 2 diabetes. HDL, high-density lipoprotein. LDL, low-density lipoprotein. ALT, alanine aminotransferase. AST, aspartate aminotransferase. GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase. US, ultrasound. FIB-4, fibrosis 4 score.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cinque, F.; Cespiati, A.; Lombardi, R.; Costantino, A.; Maffi, G.; Alletto, F.; Colavolpe, L.; Francione, P.; Oberti, G.; Fatta, E.; et al. Interaction between Lifestyle Changes and PNPLA3 Genotype in NAFLD Patients during the COVID-19 Lockdown. Nutrients 2022, 14, 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030556

AMA Style

Cinque F, Cespiati A, Lombardi R, Costantino A, Maffi G, Alletto F, Colavolpe L, Francione P, Oberti G, Fatta E, et al. Interaction between Lifestyle Changes and PNPLA3 Genotype in NAFLD Patients during the COVID-19 Lockdown. Nutrients. 2022; 14(3):556. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cinque, Felice, Annalisa Cespiati, Rosa Lombardi, Andrea Costantino, Gabriele Maffi, Francesca Alletto, Lucia Colavolpe, Paolo Francione, Giovanna Oberti, Erika Fatta, and et al. 2022. "Interaction between Lifestyle Changes and PNPLA3 Genotype in NAFLD Patients during the COVID-19 Lockdown" Nutrients 14, no. 3: 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030556

APA Style

Cinque, F., Cespiati, A., Lombardi, R., Costantino, A., Maffi, G., Alletto, F., Colavolpe, L., Francione, P., Oberti, G., Fatta, E., Bertelli, C., Sigon, G., Dongiovanni, P., Vecchi, M., Fargion, S., & Fracanzani, A. L. (2022). Interaction between Lifestyle Changes and PNPLA3 Genotype in NAFLD Patients during the COVID-19 Lockdown. Nutrients, 14(3), 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop