Most Frequently Consumed Red/Processed Meat Dishes and Plant-Based Foods and Their Contribution to the Intake of Energy, Protein, and Nutrients-to-Limit among Canadians
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population and Dietary Data Collection
2.2. Analytical Sample
2.3. Plant-Based Food and Red/Processed Meat Dishes Categories
2.4. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
4. Discussion
Strengths and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Afshin, A.; Sur, P.J.; Fay, K.A.; Cornaby, L.; Ferrara, G.; Salama, J.S.; Mullany, E.C.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abebe, Z. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019, 393, 1958–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saneei, P.; Salehi-Abargouei, A.; Esmaillzadeh, A.; Azadbakht, L. Influence of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014, 24, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, M.; Bihuniak, J.D.; Shook, J.; Kenny, A.; Kerstetter, J.; Huedo-Medina, T.B. The effect of the traditional Mediterranean-style diet on metabolic risk factors: A meta-analysis. Nutrients 2016, 8, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dinu, M.; Pagliai, G.; Casini, A.; Sofi, F. Mediterranean diet and multiple health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Health Canada. Canada’s Food Guide. Available online: https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/ (accessed on 13 July 2021).
- Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Raffoul, A.; Lee, K.M.; Jones, A.C. Top dietary sources of energy, sodium, sugars, and saturated fats among Canadians: Insights from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Physiol. Appl. Nutr. et Metab. 2019, 44, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, A.D.M.; Pereira, R.A.; Yokoo, E.M.; Levy, R.B.; Sichieri, R. Most consumed foods in Brazil: National dietary survey 2008–2009. Rev. Saude Publica 2013, 47, 190s–199s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Lin, X.; Ouyang, Y.Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, G.; Pan, A.; Hu, F.B. Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: Dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 893–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clonan, A.; Wilson, P.; Swift, J.A.; Leibovici, D.G.; Holdsworth, M. Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: Impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Potter, J.D. Red and Processed Meat, and Human and Planetary Health. BMJ. 2017, 357, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Willett, W.; Rockström, J.; Loken, B.; Springmann, M.; Lang, T.; Vermeulen, S.; Garnett, T.; Tilman, D.; DeClerck, F.; Wood, A. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 2019, 393, 447–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westhoek, H.; Lesschen, J.P.; Rood, T.; Wagner, S.; De Marco, A.; Murphy-Bokern, D.; Leip, A.; van Grinsven, H.; Sutton, M.A.; Oenema, O. Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe’s meat and dairy intake. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 26, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Health Canada. Reference Guide to Understanding and Using the Data. Available online: Https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/food-nutrition-surveillance/health-nutrition-surveys/canadian-community-health-survey-cchs/reference-guide-understanding-using-data-2015.html (accessed on 13 July 2021).
- Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey—Nutrition (CCHS). Available online: Https://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&SDDS=5049 (accessed on 13 July 2021).
- Statistics Canada. The Research Data Centres Information and Technical Bulletin-Weighted Estimation and Bootstrap Variance Estimation for Analyzing Survey Data: How to Implement in Selected Software. Available online: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-002-X201400111901 (accessed on 13 July 2021).
- Fitzgerald, M.A.; McCouch, S.R.; Hall, R.D. Not just a grain of rice: The quest for quality. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maclean, J.L.; Dawe, D.C.; Hettel, G.P.; Hardy, B. Rice Almanac: Source Book for the Most Important Economic Activity on Earth; International Rice Research Institute, CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Hoogenkamp, H.; Kumagai, H.; Wanasundara, J. Rice protein and rice protein products. In Sustainable Protein Sources; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 47–65. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, S.; Wilkens, L.R.; Shen, L.; Kolonel, L.N. Dietary sources of five nutrients in ethnic groups represented in the Multiethnic Cohort. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109, 1479–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sharma, S.; Sheehy, T.; Kolonel, L.N. Ethnic differences in grains consumption and their contribution to intake of B-vitamins: Results of the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Nutr. J. 2013, 12, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kang, M.; Shim, J.E.; Kwon, K.; Song, S. Contribution of foods to absolute nutrient intake and between-person variations of nutrient intake in Korean preschoolers. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2019, 13, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleh, A.S.; Wang, P.; Wang, N.; Yang, L.; Xiao, Z. Brown rice versus white rice: Nutritional quality, potential health benefits, development of food products, and preservation technologies. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1070–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davis, C.G.; Lin, B.-H. Factors Affecting US Beef Consumption; US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, S.; Sheehy, T.; Kolonel, L.N. Contribution of meat to vitamin B 12, iron and zinc intakes in five ethnic groups in the USA: Implications for developing food-based dietary guidelines. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2013, 26, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- O’Neil, C.E.; Keast, D.R.; Fulgoni, V.L.; Nicklas, T.A. Food sources of energy and nutrients among adults in the US: NHANES 2003–2006. Nutrients 2012, 4, 2097–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huth, P.J.; Fulgoni, V.L.; Keast, D.R.; Park, K.; Auestad, N. Major food sources of calories, added sugars, and saturated fat and their contribution to essential nutrient intakes in the U.S. diet: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003–2006). Nutr. J. 2013, 12, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pasiakos, S.M.; Agarwal, S.; Lieberman, H.R.; Fulgoni, V.L., III. Sources and Amounts of Animal, Dairy, and Plant Protein Intake of US Adults in 2007–2010. Nutrients 2015, 7, 7058–7069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carvalho, A.M.; Selem, S.S.; Miranda, A.M.; Marchioni, D.M. Excessive red and processed meat intake: Relations with health and environment in Brazil. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 2011–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Escriba-Perez, C.; Baviera-Puig, A.; Buitrago-Vera, J.; Montero-Vicente, L. Consumer profile analysis for different types of meat in Spain. Meat Sci. 2017, 129, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sui, Z.; Raubenheimer, D.; Rangan, A. Consumption patterns of meat, poultry, and fish after disaggregation of mixed dishes: Secondary analysis of the Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2011–12. BMC Nutr. 2017, 3, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hamada, G.S.; Kowalski, L.P.; Nishimoto, I.N.; Rodrigues, J.J.G.; Iriya, K.; Sasazuki, S.; Hanaoka, T.; Tsugane, S. Risk factors for stomach cancer in Brazil (II): A case-control study among Japanese Brazilians in Sao Paulo. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 32, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figg, W.D. How do you want your steak prepared? The impact of meat consumption and preparation on prostate cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2012, 13, 1141–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hermans, K.E.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Loef, C.; Jansen, R.L.; Schouten, L.J. Meat consumption and cancer of unknown primary (CUP) risk: Results from The Netherlands cohort study on diet and cancer. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 4579–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deoula, M.S.; El Kinany, K.; Huybrechts, I.; Gunter, M.J.; Hatime, Z.; Boudouaya, H.A.; Benslimane, A.; Nejjari, C.; El Abkari, M.; Badre, W. Consumption of meat, traditional and modern processed meat and colorectal cancer risk among the Moroccan population: A large-scale case–control study. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 146, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, Y.; de Kok, T.M.; Verbeke, W. Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards processed meat products with natural compounds and a reduced level of nitrite. Meat Sci. 2016, 121, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebastian, R.S.; Wilkinson Enns, C.; Goldman, J.D.; Hoy, M.K.; Moshfegh, A.J. Sandwiches are major contributors of sodium in the diets of American adults: Results from What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2010. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 115, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniel, C.R.; Cross, A.J.; Koebnick, C.; Sinha, R. Trends in meat consumption in the USA. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Colin-Ramirez, E.; Espinosa-Cuevas, Á.; Miranda-Alatriste, P.V.; Tovar-Villegas, V.I.; Arcand, J.; Correa-Rotter, R. Food sources of sodium intake in an adult mexican population: A sub-analysis of the SALMEX study. Nutrients 2017, 9, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ni Mhurchu, C.; Capelin, C.; Dunford, E.K.; Webster, J.L.; Neal, B.C.; Jebb, S.A. Sodium content of processed foods in the United Kingdom: Analysis of 44,000 foods purchased by 21,000 households. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pereira, R.A.; Duffey, K.J.; Sichieri, R.; Popkin, B.M. Sources of excessive saturated fat, trans fat and sugar consumption in Brazil: An analysis of the first Brazilian nationwide individual dietary survey. Public Health Nutr. 2014, 17, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Micha, R.; Michas, G.; Mozaffarian, D. Unprocessed red and processed meats and risk of coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes—An updated review of the evidence. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2012, 14, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mozaffarian, D.; Micha, R.; Wallace, S. Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2010, 7, e1000252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.; Hu, E.A.; Rebholz, C.M. Ultra-processed food intake and mortality in the USA: Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988–1994). Public Health Nutr. 2019, 22, 1777–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Araya, C.; Corvalán, C.; Cediel, G.; Taillie, L.; Reyes, M. Ultra-processed food consumption among chilean preschoolers is associated with diets promoting non-communicable diseases. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vatanparast, H.; Islam, N.; Shafiee, M.; Ramdath, D.D. Increasing Plant-Based Meat Alternatives and Decreasing Red and Processed Meat in the Diet Differentially Affect the Diet Quality and Nutrient Intakes of Canadians. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rank | Red/Processed Meat Dishes | % of Individuals Reporting the Red/Processed Meat Dishes | Plant-Based Foods | % of Individuals Reporting the Plant-Based food |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ground beef or patty, cooked, NS as to regular, lean, or extra lean | 4.6 | Grains, rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked | 15.5 |
2 | Sandwich, ham and cheese, with lettuce and spread | 2.6 | Tomato, red, ripe, canned, whole | 13.4 |
3 | Sandwich, ham, with lettuce and spread | 2.9 | Tomato products, canned, puree, no salt added | 10.1 |
4 | Frankfurter, wiener, or hot dog, with ketchup and/or mustard, on bun | 2 | Peanut butter, smooth type, fat, sugar and salt added | 10.2 |
5 | Frankfurter, wiener, or hot dog, plain, on bun | 1.1 | Soup, canned, cream of asparagus, condensed, milk added | 7.5 |
6 | Spaghetti sauce with beef or meat other than lamb or mutton, homemade-style | 1.7 | Soup, broth, beef, ready-to-serve | 6.6 |
7 | Spaghetti sauce with meat and vegetables, homemade-style | 1.2 | Tomato products, canned, sauce | 5.9 |
8 | Spaghetti sauce with a combination of meats, homemade-style | 1.1 | Soup, broth, chicken, ready-to-serve | 4.8 |
9 | Pork, spareribs, barbecued, with sauce, NS as to fat eaten | 0.8 | Plant-based beverage, almond, enriched, sweetened, vanilla flavored | 2.8 |
10 | Shepherd’s pie, with corn | 0.8 | Nuts, almonds, dried, unblanched, unroasted | 3.3 |
Red/Processed Meat Dishes | Dietary Components and Rank | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy | Protein | SFA | Sugars | Sodium | ||
1 | Ground beef or patty, cooked, NS as to regular, lean, or extra lean | 5 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 9 |
2 | Sandwich, ham and cheese, with lettuce and spread | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
3 | Sandwich, ham, with lettuce and spread | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
4 | Frankfurter, wiener, or hot dog, with ketchup and/or mustard, on bun | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
5 | Frankfurter, wiener, or hot dog, plain, on bun | 6 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 7 |
6 | Spaghetti sauce with beef or meat other than lamb or mutton, homemade-style | 8 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
7 | Spaghetti sauce with meat and vegetables, homemade-style | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 5 |
8 | Spaghetti sauce with combination of meats, homemade-style | 9 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
9 | Pork, spareribs, barbecued, with sauce, NS as to fat eaten | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
10 | Shepherd’s pie, with corn | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
Plant-Based Foods | Dietary Components and Rank | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy | Protein | SFA | Sugars | Sodium | ||
1 | Grains, rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 8 |
2 | Tomato, red, ripe, canned, whole | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
3 | Tomato products, canned, puree, no salt added | 6 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
4 | Peanut butter, smooth type, fat, sugar and salt added | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
5 | Soup, canned, cream of asparagus, condensed, milk added | 3 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
6 | Soup, broth, beef, ready-to-serve | 9 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 1 |
7 | Tomato products, canned, sauce | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
8 | Soup, broth, chicken, ready-to-serve | 10 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 2 |
9 | Plant-based beverage, almond, enriched, sweetened, vanilla flavored | 5 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
10 | Nuts, almonds, dried, unblanched, unroasted | 4 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
% Population (% ±SE) | Dietary Components 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top 5 Red/Processed Meat Dishes | Energy | Protein | SFA | Sugars | Sodium | |
# 1 Ground beef or patty, cooked, NS as to regular, lean, or extra lean | 4.6 ± 0.4 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 74.7 ± 3.57 | 7.9 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0 | 116.2 ± 5.6 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 9.5 ± 0.6 | 0 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | |
# 2 Sandwich, ham and cheese, with lettuce and spread | 2.6 ± 0.2 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 421.5 ± 14.9 | 24.8 ± 0.9 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 1408.5 ± 54.6 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 21.8 ± 0.7 | 31.4 ± 1.1 | 31.0 ± 1.0 | 8.2 ± 0.5 | 41.8 ± 1.3 | |
# 3 Sandwich, ham, with lettuce and spread | 2.9 ± 0.3 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 332.9 ± 18.6 | 19.2 ± 1.0 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 1226.7 ± 59.9 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 17.7 ± 0.8 | 25.2 ± 1.1 | 14.6 ± 1.0 | 7.1 ± 0.5 | 38.0 ± 1.3 | |
# 4 Frankfurter, wiener, or hot dog, with ketchup and/or mustard, on bun | 2.0 ± 0.2 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 351.7 ± 19.2 | 14.0 ± 0.8 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 8.3 ± 0.5 | 1154.5 ± 51.2 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 18.1 ± 0.8 | 20.6 ± 1.1 | 24.0 ± 1.1 | 10.9 ± 0.9 | 36.9 ± 1.3 | |
# 5 Frankfurter, wiener, or hot dog, plain, on bun | 1.1 ± 0.2 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 257.8 ± 15.9 | 10.9 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 844.4 ± 50.8 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 13.7 ± 0.8 | 16.4 ± 1.2 | 22.4 ± 0.2 | 6.5 ± 1.5 | 27.6 ± 1.3 |
% Population (% ±SE) | Dietary Components 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top 5 Plant-Based Foods | Energy | Protein | SFA | Sugars | Sodium | |
# 1 Grains, rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked | 15.5 ± 0.6 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 199.4 ± 5.8 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.04 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 12.1 ± 0.3 | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.04 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.09 ± 0.0 | |
# 2 Tomato, red, ripe, canned, whole | 13.4 ± 0.5 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 7.6 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 54.3 ± 2.2 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (%) | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.5 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.07 | |
# 3 Tomato products, canned, puree, no salt added | 10.1 ± 0.4 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 14.6 ± 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.09 | 10.7 ± 0.5 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 0.7 ± 0.03 | 0.9 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | |
# 4 Peanut butter, smooth type, fat, sugar and salt added | 10.2 ± 0.5 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 168.1 ± 8.5 | 6.2 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 119.8 ± 6.1 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 8.4 ± 0.03 | 8.1 ± 0.3 | 13.3 ± 0.05 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ±0.2 | |
# 5 Soup, canned, cream of asparagus, condensed, milk added | 7.5 ± 0.4 | |||||
Daily intake (mean ± SE) | 45.4 ± 3.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | |
% Contribution per consumer/day (% ±SE) | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.0 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shafiee, M.; Islam, N.; Ramdath, D.D.; Vatanparast, H. Most Frequently Consumed Red/Processed Meat Dishes and Plant-Based Foods and Their Contribution to the Intake of Energy, Protein, and Nutrients-to-Limit among Canadians. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14061257
Shafiee M, Islam N, Ramdath DD, Vatanparast H. Most Frequently Consumed Red/Processed Meat Dishes and Plant-Based Foods and Their Contribution to the Intake of Energy, Protein, and Nutrients-to-Limit among Canadians. Nutrients. 2022; 14(6):1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14061257
Chicago/Turabian StyleShafiee, Mojtaba, Naorin Islam, D. Dan Ramdath, and Hassan Vatanparast. 2022. "Most Frequently Consumed Red/Processed Meat Dishes and Plant-Based Foods and Their Contribution to the Intake of Energy, Protein, and Nutrients-to-Limit among Canadians" Nutrients 14, no. 6: 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14061257
APA StyleShafiee, M., Islam, N., Ramdath, D. D., & Vatanparast, H. (2022). Most Frequently Consumed Red/Processed Meat Dishes and Plant-Based Foods and Their Contribution to the Intake of Energy, Protein, and Nutrients-to-Limit among Canadians. Nutrients, 14(6), 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14061257