Next Article in Journal
Phase Angle as Surrogate Marker of Muscle Weakness in Kidney Transplant Candidates Referred to Prehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
Postbiotics as Molecules Targeting Cellular Events of Aging Brain—The Role in Pathogenesis, Prophylaxis and Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 14
10.3390/nu16142246
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Satisfaction Paradoxes in Health Behaviors: Contrasting Patterns across Weight, Physical Activity and Dietary Habits

by
Mohammed A. Muaddi
1,
Anwar M. Makeen
1,
Ibrahim M. Gosadi
1,
Mohammad A. Jareebi
1,
Abdullah A. Alharbi
1,
Ahmed A. Bahri
1,
Majed A. Ryani
1,
Mohamed Salih Mahfouz
1,
Osama Albasheer
1,
Suhaila A. Ali
1,
Abdulmajeed A. Arishi
2,
Fatima A. Alsam
2 and
Ahmad Y. Alqassim
1,*
1
Family and Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
2
Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(14), 2246; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142246
Submission received: 8 June 2024 / Revised: 29 June 2024 / Accepted: 9 July 2024 / Published: 12 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition Methodology & Assessment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Obesity, a poor diet, and inactivity are major health issues among Saudi youth. However, satisfaction with unhealthy lifestyles could impede change. This study assessed lifestyle factors and related satisfaction among Saudi university students. (2) Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 1957 students at Jazan University completed surveys on demographics, physical activity, dietary habits, and 10-point satisfaction scales for weight, activity, and diet. Chi-squared tests and logistic regression were used to analyze the associations between behaviors and satisfaction. (3) Results: Overweight/obesity prevalence was 25.45%, and only 26.67% of the subjects met activity guidelines. Many of them exhibited poor dietary habits. Despite unhealthy behaviors, some expressed high satisfaction, especially regarding their diets. Subjects with a normal BMI had the highest weight satisfaction. Activity satisfaction increased with higher activity levels. Dietary satisfaction was minimally impacted by healthfulness. Males and higher incomes were correlated with greater satisfaction. (4) Conclusions: A concerning paradox exists between unhealthy lifestyles and satisfaction among Saudi university students, particularly regarding their diets. Multicomponent interventions informed by behavior change theories and employing motivational techniques are urgently needed to address this disconnect and facilitate positive behavior change.

1. Introduction

Obesity, a poor diet, and physical inactivity have emerged as major public health challenges among young adults worldwide [1]. Compared to global averages, Saudi Arabia (SA) experiences disproportionately high obesity rates (35% versus 13% worldwide) [2] and obesity-related mortality (18% of deaths versus 8% globally) [3]. This elevated burden is likely fueled by a high prevalence of sedentary lifestyles and poor dietary habits, as noted across various studies of young Saudi adults [4,5,6]. These unhealthy lifestyles significantly increase risks for non-communicable diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer [7]. The resulting morbidity not only compromises people’s quality of life on an individual level but also threatens the health of future populations, healthcare capacity, workforce productivity, and economic progress across SA [8,9].
In this study, satisfaction refers to an individual’s overall contentment and positive assessment of their current lifestyle behaviors, specifically their body weight status, level of physical activity, and dietary habits. A growing body of research highlights concerning rates of obesity, inactivity, and poor diets among university students in SA and neighboring countries [10,11,12,13]. However, associations between health behaviors and related satisfaction remain unclear. Some studies reveal coexistence of obesity and related risks with high levels of satisfaction that can be referred to as a “risk paradox”. In contrast, other evidence indicates that lower satisfaction is related to inactivity or being overweight [14,15,16]. The promotion of nutritional changes is a major challenge compared to increasing exercise, with taste preferences, ingrained habits, and low self-efficacy hampering dietary improvements despite there being various incentives to eat healthier [17,18,19].
Given these conflicting findings and the concept of the “satisfaction paradox”, where individuals exhibit risks like obesity yet report high satisfaction, the current study aimed to elucidate relationships between lifestyle factors and satisfaction levels among Saudi university students. We hypothesized that students exhibiting obesity, physical inactivity, and poor dietary habits would report lower satisfaction compared to students with healthier lifestyles. Recognizing these risks and perceptions will inform tailored interventions to mitigate obesity and chronic disease burdens impacting Saudi youth.
To promote health, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends regular physical activity and consuming a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains while limiting the intake of fat, sugar, and salt [20]. The American Heart Association recommends a minimum of 150 min of moderate exercise per week for optimal health [21]. However, both physical inactivity and poor dietary habits are highly prevalent among young Saudi adults, constituting major public health concerns [10,22]. Studies have found low rates of meeting recommended physical activity guidelines among Saudi adults, with only 15.0–33.2% engaging in 150 min or more of moderate activity per week [23,24]. Regarding diet, frequent fast food consumption, high intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, and low fruit/vegetable intake characterize a typical pattern seen in this population [10]. For instance, only 3.27% of Saudi university students meet the daily fruit/vegetable recommendations [25], while a study of female university students found that 97% of them consume fast food daily [26]. More broadly, results from a nationally representative survey indicate that dietary guideline recommendations are met by only 5.2% and 7.5% of Saudis for fruits and vegetables, respectively [10].
In an effort to address the significant health and societal consequences associated with obesity, the government of SA is enacting a comprehensive set of policies as part of its Vision 2030 initiative, which is aimed at promoting a healthier lifestyle. The Vision 2030 plan prioritizes the promotion of healthy lifestyles and the prevention of obesity as its key objectives. This forward-thinking policy framework aims to foster environments, resources, and messages that encourage increased physical activity and improved dietary behaviors across the Saudi population [27].
While previous studies have documented a high prevalence of sedentary lifestyles, unhealthy eating patterns, and elevated obesity levels among the Saudi adult population, few have examined their own satisfaction regarding these behaviors. This represents a key gap within our knowledge as satisfaction with potentially unhealthy lifestyle choices could constitute a barrier to positive behavior changes [28,29]. Evidence on whether such a disconnect between health behaviors and perceptions exists within Saudi adults is limited.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess physical activity patterns, dietary habits, weight status, and related satisfaction levels among students at Jazan University. Recognizing lifestyle risks and perceptions is vital for mitigating immediate and long-term obesity and chronic disease burdens impacting the well-being and productivity of Saudi youth, with university settings offering a valuable opportunity for health promotion initiatives.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

This work is part of a larger project carried out in May and June 2023 to assess the health needs of Jazan University’s faculty members, administrative staff, and undergraduate students [30,31]. This research employed a cross-sectional study design that was conducted among Jazan University affiliates. Jazan University is a leading higher education institution in southwest Saudi Arabia. The university was established in 2005 and is populated by more than 50,000 students across 23 colleges, with 21 of them offering bachelor’s degree programs and 1 offering diploma programs.

2.2. Population and Sampling Design

This study targeted Jazan University’s undergraduate students aged 18 years and older who were registered for the academic year 2022/2023. The sample size was calculated to be 2291 students based on a sample size formula for estimating a single proportion [32]. The parameters used in the calculation involved a 95% confidence interval, an expected proportion (p) presumed as 50% (representing the proportion generating the largest sample size since this study measured several lifestyle characteristics), and a margin of error (d) set at 2% to reflect the desired precision. Convenience sampling was used to recruit study participants from various university colleges. To ensure representative sampling, we selected a proportional number of students from the chosen colleges.

2.3. Data Collection and Study Tool

The data were gathered through personal interviews conducted by trained medical students using a standardized questionnaire. Recruitment involved identification and direct approach of targeted students on university campus. Students who agreed to participate completed the interview.
The questionnaire captured information on demographics, lifestyle factors, dietary habits, physical activity, tobacco and khat use, nutrition, weight, and height. Assessed variables aligned with Saudi guidelines on the prevention and management of obesity [33]. Self-reported physical activity was evaluated by asking if participants met the recommended 150 min of physical activity per week threshold. Dietary behaviors were assessed through questions on adherence to healthy eating recommendations, specifically, consumption of whole-grain products, fruits and vegetables, low-fat meats, and low-fat products, as well as avoidance of high sugar foods. The students were also asked to rate their overall satisfaction with their lifestyles. Detailed information about the questionnaire, including its validity and reliability, was published elsewhere [31].

2.4. Study Variables and Measures

The main study outcomes were satisfaction levels related to body weight, physical activity, and eating behaviors among university students in Jazan. Independent variables included demographic characteristics, eating behaviors, physical activity, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and khat chewing.
BMI was calculated based on measured height and weight using the standard formula of weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. The BMI was categorized according to World Health Organization (WHO), which suggests that individuals with BMI < 16.0 kg/m2 are underweight, BMI = 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 are normal weight, BMI = 25.0–30.0 kg/m2 are overweight, and BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 are obese [34].
Satisfaction for each domain (weight, activity, diet) was measured on a 10-point scale, with a score of 5 or above defined as satisfaction and below 5 as dissatisfaction.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.2.3). The analysis included both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. Continuous numerical variables with a normal distribution were reported as means and standard deviations (SDs), while variables with skewed distribution were presented as medians and interquartile range (IQR). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess the relationship between eating behavior variables and satisfaction.
Median satisfaction and IQRs were compared across BMI categories, physical activity levels, and adherence to healthy eating recommendations. For binary analyses, a cutoff of 5 was used to categorize satisfaction levels. Participants with scores of 5 or higher were classified as satisfied, while those below 5 were classified as dissatisfied.
Logistic regression analysis was also used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for selected covariates with the outcome variables. Students’ satisfaction with their weight, physical activity levels, and dietary behaviors were examined as outcome variables. A p-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. Additionally, Microsoft Excel was utilized to graph and visualize the satisfaction levels for the different lifestyles studied.
To assess the robustness of the findings and the impact of the chosen satisfaction thresholds on the observed paradox, analyses were conducted using alternative cutoff values (6, 7, and 8) on the 10-point satisfaction scale. The results of the sensitivity analysis using the alternative cutoff values are presented in the Supplementary Materials. Additionally, stratified analyses were performed to examine the consistency of the results across different subgroups, such as gender, age, and socioeconomic status.

3. Results

This cross-sectional study included 1957 Saudi university students with a mean age of 21 years. As shown in Table 1, the sample contained a nearly equal proportion of males and females. Height and weight differed by gender, with greater values being seen among males compared to females, resulting in higher average BMIs. Participants’ places of residence were also evenly split between rural and urban areas. Over half of the participants had relatively low family incomes, were single, and lived in owned housing. Overall, participants’ rates of smoking and khat use were low. Regarding BMI status, over half of the participants were normal weight, while around 25% were overweight/obese. Many participants were insufficiently physically active, with only about 27% meeting the guidelines. Around half of the participants exhibited some healthy eating habits. The proportion who reported engaging in some of the outlined healthy dietary habits ranged from about 26% to 54%.
Table 2 displays the median and IQR of satisfaction levels across BMI categories, physical activity levels, and selected eating behaviors. Satisfaction levels demonstrated a reverse J-shaped pattern across BMI categories, with the highest satisfaction among normal weight and the lowest satisfaction among obese individuals (Figure 1). For physical activity, satisfaction showed a dose–response relationship (Figure 2), with the highest satisfaction reported among participants achieving the recommended 150 min of or more of physical activity per week. Those engaging in less than 150 min of physical activity per week displayed lower satisfaction, while participants reporting no activity had the lowest satisfaction. Minimal differences were observed in satisfaction levels between individuals that adhered to healthy eating behaviors compared to those who did not (Figure 3).
Table 3 shows the distribution of satisfaction levels for body weight, physical activity, and eating behaviors. Satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5. Satisfaction levels varied noticeably across different BMI categories, with the highest dissatisfaction being recorded among obese participants and the highest satisfaction among normal weight participants. For physical activity, individuals engaging in no physical activity predominantly expressed dissatisfaction, while those engaging in 150 min or more of physical activity per week demonstrated higher satisfaction. Minimal differences were observed in satisfaction levels among individuals that practiced healthy eating habits compared to those who did not.
The multivariate analysis reveals the predictors associated with satisfaction levels regarding weight, physical activity, and eating behaviors. As demonstrated in Table 4, factors like older age, male gender, higher income, urban residence, normal BMI, meeting physical activity guidelines, and healthy eating habits were associated with greater satisfaction in one or more domains. Conversely, overweight/obesity tended to predict lower satisfaction.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to assess lifestyle choices and relevant satisfaction among university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. We hypothesized that students exhibiting obesity, physical inactivity, and poor dietary habits would report lower satisfaction levels compared to students with healthier lifestyles. However, the current findings revealed a more complex relationship. The findings provide valuable insights into the high prevalence of obesity, poor dietary habits, and physical inactivity among students. However, they also revealed a paradoxical relationship between dietary habits and perceived satisfaction. Individuals exhibited minimal differences in satisfaction levels regardless of their adherence to healthy eating guidelines. This finding is significantly different comparted to the more expected patterns seen for weight and physical activity satisfaction, where those with suboptimal BMIs or insufficient activity expressed lower satisfaction. The data point to a disconnect between dietary behaviors and perceived satisfaction, whereas satisfaction tended be more closely related with weight status and activity levels. A further exploration of this satisfaction/behavior discrepancy regarding people’s diets is necessary, as it may constitute a barrier to positive nutritional changes among students engaging in objectively unhealthy eating habits yet reporting satisfaction with their habits.
The observed prevalence of overweight/obesity (25.45%), no/low activity (73.33% not meeting guidelines), and the significant proportion of participants exhibiting suboptimal dietary habits aligned with the trends noted in other studies of young adults in Saudi Arabia and neighboring countries [10,11,12,13]. This highlights the profound impacts of nutrition transitions, technological advances reducing activity, and the adoption of Western lifestyles, which are associated with modernization and urbanization in the region [35,36]. The findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive interventions to promote healthy dietary practices, active living, and weight management on university campuses to mitigate the risk of future disease among this vulnerable cohort [37].
Alarmingly, despite engaging in objectively unhealthy behaviors, some participants reported high levels of satisfaction related to their weight, diet, and physical activity. This “satisfaction-behavior paradox” suggests that many students may be in the precontemplation stage and not recognize the problematic nature of their habits [38]. The pronounced dietary paradox indicates that these students lack motivation to improve poor nutritional choices, representing a key barrier to positive change.
While most pronounced for diet, satisfaction/behavior disconnects existed to some degrees across domains. The dose–response relationship between physical activity, obesity, and satisfaction aligns with previous research, showing gratification from measurable improvements [14,15,16]. However, some still expressed satisfaction despite insufficient activity or unhealthy weight, highlighting the complexity of this relationship.
The weaker association of dietary habits with satisfaction highlights the unique challenges of promoting nutritional change, likely stemming from the difficulties of sacrificing tasty food for long-term health [17], ingrained habits [18], and lack of nutritional self-efficacy. Although motivated to eat healthier, many struggle to translate intentions into sustained action [19].
Executing a truly balanced diet requires people to consistently coordinate complex behaviors, which could account for why satisfaction is detached from objective dietary quality. These challenges appear to perpetuate the risk paradox between poor dietary choices and perceived satisfaction to a greater degree compared to activity and weight [39]. Though less pervasive, obstacles like body image perceptions, low fitness awareness, and environmental barriers may also contribute to inflated satisfaction ratings despite certain individuals having an unhealthy weight or being inactive [40].
These insights indicate a need for personalized, stage-based interventions to promote change among students exhibiting risk paradoxes. University initiatives should employ motivational interviewing to raise awareness and resolve the ambivalence regarding unhealthy behaviors. Facilitating incremental shifts, providing resources, and modifying environmental cues can help progress students through precontemplation. Qualitative research could inform motivational strategies tailored to young adults. Comprehensive interventions using personalized messaging and consciousness-raising activities can prompt readiness to change [41,42,43,44]. By meeting students with a gradual, compassionate approach, universities can address gaps and barriers at the precontemplation stage.
However, other studies have reported more predictable associations between healthy dietary practices and higher satisfaction levels [45,46,47], highlighting the complexity of this relationship. The stark contrast between the dietary habits’ paradox and the expected associations for weight and physical activity satisfaction observed in this study of young university students has important implications for health promotion efforts. Individuals that were satisfied with their dietary habits despite displaying poor adherence to nutritional guidelines may lack motivation for positive dietary changes. In less-educated or elderly populations, the paradox may manifest differently or be exacerbated by factors such as lower health literacy, cultural traditions, socioeconomic constraints, and age-related physiological changes [48,49,50]. Addressing this paradox requires multifaceted interventions that enhance people’s nutritional literacy, foster accurate self-evaluation, and empower individuals to make informed dietary choices that are aligned with evidence-based guidelines.
Several sociodemographic and behavioral factors were identified as significant predictors of domain-specific satisfaction levels. Male gender, higher income status, normal weight, meeting activity guidelines, and healthy dietary habits like sufficient fruit/vegetable intake were all associated with greater satisfaction related to weight, diet, and physical activity. These findings aligned with previous studies and can guide targeted interventions that address specific risk profiles [49].
This study highlights the urgent need for comprehensive university health promotion initiatives to counter the escalating obesity and related disease trends compromising young adults’ well-being. The satisfaction/behavior paradox shows that simply providing education, improved resources, and facilities is insufficient. However, this requires participatory interventions tailored to students’ specific readiness to change. Qualitative research is needed to directly assess motivation and habit strength related to the observed risk paradoxes. Multicomponent programs incorporating individual, interpersonal, and environmental levels are also required. By elucidating this complex issue through coordinated initiatives facilitating lifestyle improvements, universities can mitigate both immediate and long-term health consequences threatening this vulnerable cohort. University settings represent an opportune avenue, given their wide reach and formative influence during this critical life stage. Additionally, the controlled university community allows customized interventions to be readily implemented through coordinated efforts.

Strengths and Limitations

This study has several strengths, including a large sample size of university students, the use of a validated questionnaire assessing lifestyles in a culturally relevant manner, a comprehensive assessment of various lifestyle factors, and the use of robust statistical analyses that were used to examine the associations between these factors and satisfaction levels. Additionally, this study explored the influence of sociodemographic factors, providing valuable insights into potential disparities and the need for tailored interventions. However, the cross-sectional nature of this study precludes the establishment of causal relationships between the variables assessed. Furthermore, the use of self-reported data obtained through direct interviews may have introduced response bias, particularly social desirability bias regarding sensitive topics like dietary choices, substance use, income, and physical activity. This could potentially influence the accuracy of the reported lifestyle behaviors and satisfaction levels. Future self-administered anonymous surveys are needed to validate the findings. Other limitations include the generalizability of this single-university sample. Moreover, cultural and environmental factors may vary across different geographical locations and populations, potentially influencing lifestyle choices and perceptions. More nuanced gender analyses will be undertaken as part of our ongoing work in this area.

5. Conclusions

This study reveals high obesity, poor diet, and low activity levels among Saudi university students, representing major public health threats. However, it also uncovers a disconnect between students’ unhealthy lifestyles (especially dietary choices) and elevated satisfaction levels. Minimal dietary satisfaction differences emerged despite participants’ adherence to the guidelines, contrasting with the expected associations between satisfaction and weight/activity status. These findings underscore an urgent need for coordinated university health promotion programs employing motivational interviewing, incremental goal setting, and environmental modifications to raise risk awareness and empower self-efficacy. Implementing such multifaceted initiatives within university settings represents a valuable opportunity, given their wide reach and formative influence during this critical life stage. Additionally, the controlled university community allows for a feasible implementation of customized interventions. Addressing this issue early, before lifestyle patterns become entrenched, can facilitate positive changes, mitigating immediate and lifelong obesity and chronic disease burdens. However, this requires participatory interventions tailored to students’ specific readiness to change. This study suggests that university administrators, health professionals, and policymakers should develop comprehensive health promotion programs for university students. These programs should raise awareness about health risks, motivate change, and provide resources for healthy behaviors. Collaborative partnerships between universities, healthcare providers, and community organizations can ensure sustainability. Future research should examine the temporal relationships between health behaviors, satisfaction levels, and long-term health outcomes. Investing in university students’ well-being can improve population health, productivity, and reduce healthcare costs for future generations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu16142246/s1, Table S1. (With cutoff 8): The distribution of satisfaction level for weight, physical activity, and eating behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia; Table S2. (With cutoff 7): The distribution of satisfaction level for weight, physical activity, and eating behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Table S3. (With cutoff 6): The distribution of satisfaction level for weight, physical activity, and eating behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.M., A.M.M., I.M.G., M.A.J., A.A.A. (Abdullah A. Alharbi), A.A.B., M.A.R., M.S.M., O.A., S.A.A., A.A.A. (Abdulmajeed A. Arishi), F.A.A. and A.Y.A.; methodology, M.A.M., A.M.M., I.M.G., M.A.J., A.A.A. (Abdullah A. Alharbi), A.A.B., M.A.R., M.S.M., O.A., S.A.A. and A.Y.A.; software, M.A.M. and S.A.A.; validation, M.A.M., A.M.M., I.M.G. and S.A.A.; formal analysis, M.A.M. and A.M.M.; investigation, S.A.A.; resources, M.A.M., A.M.M., I.M.G. and S.A.A.; data curation, M.A.M., A.M.M., I.M.G., M.A.J., A.A.A. (Abdullah A. Alharbi), A.A.B., M.A.R., M.S.M., O.A., A.A.A. (Abdulmajeed A. Arishi), F.A.A. and S.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.M., A.M.M., I.M.G., M.A.J., A.A.A. (Abdullah A. Alharbi), A.A.B., M.A.R., M.S.M., O.A., S.A.A. and A.Y.A.; writing—review and editing, M.A.M.; visualization, M.A.M., A.M.M., I.M.G., M.A.J., A.A.A. (Abdullah A. Alharbi), A.A.B., M.A.R., M.S.M., O.A., S.A.A. and A.Y.A.; supervision, M.A.M., S.A.A. and A.Y.A.; project administration, M.A.M., A.M.M., I.M.G. and S.A.A.; literature searches, M.A.M. and A.M.M.; data management, M.A.M. and A.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Standing Committee for Scientific Research of Jazan University (protocol code REC 44/10/630; date of approval 3 May 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their deepest gratitude to all the students who participated in this study by generously sparing their time and sharing personal information about their health behaviors and perceptions. We also wish to acknowledge the diligent efforts of our trained data collection team in carefully conducting the survey administration and data entry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. Key Facts. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  2. DeNicola, E.; Aburizaiza, O.S.; Siddique, A.; Khwaja, H.; Carpenter, D.O. Obesity and public health in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Rev. Environ. Health 2015, 30, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stanaway, J.D.; Afshin, A.; Gakidou, E.; Lim, S.S.; Abate, D.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbasi, N.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1923–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alsulami, S.; Baig, M.; Ahmad, T.; Althagafi, N.; Hazzazi, E.; Alsayed, R.; Alghamdi, M.; Almohammadi, T. Obesity prevalence, physical activity, and dietary practices among adults in Saudi Arabia. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1124051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Daoud, F.; El Bcheraoui, C.; Tuffaha, M.; Al Mazroa, M.A.; Al Saeedi, M.; Nooh, R.M.; Al Rayess, Z.; Al-Raddadi, R.M.; Memish, Z.A.; Basulaiman, M.; et al. The health status of Saudi women: Findings from a national survey. J. Public Health 2016, 38, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garawi, F.; Ploubidis, G.B.; Devries, K.; Al-Hamdan, N.; Uauy, R. Do routinely measured risk factors for obesity explain the sex gap in its prevalence? Observations from Saudi Arabia. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, Y.; Schoufour, J.; Wang, D.D.; Dhana, K.; Pan, A.; Liu, X.; Song, M.; Liu, G.; Shin, H.J.; Sun, Q. Healthy lifestyle and life expectancy free of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2020, 368, l6669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chaker, L.; Falla, A.; van der Lee, S.J.; Muka, T.; Imo, D.; Jaspers, L.; Colpani, V.; Mendis, S.; Chowdhury, R.; Bramer, W.M. The global impact of non-communicable diseases on macro-economic productivity: A systematic review. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 30, 357–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Muka, T.; Imo, D.; Jaspers, L.; Colpani, V.; Chaker, L.; van der Lee, S.J.; Mendis, S.; Chowdhury, R.; Bramer, W.M.; Falla, A. The global impact of non-communicable diseases on healthcare spending and national income: A systematic review. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 30, 251–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Moradi-Lakeh, M.; El Bcheraoui, C.; Afshin, A.; Daoud, F.; AlMazroa, M.A.; Al Saeedi, M.; Basulaiman, M.; Memish, Z.A.; Al Rabeeah, A.A.; Mokdad, A.H. Diet in Saudi Arabia: Findings from a nationally representative survey. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Althumiri, N.A.; Basyouni, M.H.; AlMousa, N.; AlJuwaysim, M.F.; Almubark, R.A.; BinDhim, N.F.; Alkhamaali, Z.; Alqahtani, S.A. Obesity in Saudi Arabia in 2020: Prevalence, Distribution, and Its Current Association with Various Health Conditions. Healthcare 2021, 9, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ministry of Health. World Health Survey—Saudi Arabia 2019 Final Report. 2019. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/Population-Health-Indicators/Documents/World-Health-Survey-Saudi-Arabia.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2024).
  13. Al-Jawaldeh, A.; Abbass, M.M. Unhealthy dietary habits and obesity: The major risk factors beyond non-communicable diseases in the eastern mediterranean region. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 817808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kuk, J.L.; Ardern, C.I.; Church, T.S.; Hebert, J.R.; Sui, X.; Blair, S.N. Ideal weight and weight satisfaction: Association with health practices. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 170, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tyrovolas, S.; Koyanagi, A.; Stickley, A.; Haro, J.M. Weight perception, satisfaction, control, and low energy dietary reporting in the US adult population: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2012. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2016, 116, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Schlomann, A.; Seifert, A.; Rietz, C. Relevance of activity tracking with mobile devices in the relationship between physical activity levels and satisfaction with physical fitness in older adults: Representative survey. JMIR Aging 2019, 2, e12303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vosgerau, J.; Scopelliti, I.; Huh, Y.E. Exerting self-control ≠ sacrificing pleasure. J. Consum. Psychol. 2020, 30, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gardner, B.; Arden, M.A.; Brown, D.; Eves, F.F.; Green, J.; Hamilton, K.; Hankonen, N.; Inauen, J.; Keller, J.; Kwasnicka, D.; et al. Developing habit-based health behaviour change interventions: Twenty-one questions to guide future research. Psychol. Health 2023, 38, 518–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Adriaanse, M.A.; Vinkers, C.D.W.; De Ridder, D.T.D.; Hox, J.J.; De Wit, J.B.F. Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Appetite 2011, 56, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. WHO. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  21. Association, A.H. Recommendations for Physical Activity in Adults. Available online: https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/fitness/fitness-basics/aha-recs-for-physical-activity-in-adults (accessed on 2 May 2024).
  22. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.A.; Riley, L.M.; Bull, F.C. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1· 9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e1077–e1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Awadalla, N.; Aboelyazed, A.; Hassanein, M.; Khalil, S.; Aftab, R.; Gaballa, I.; Mahfouz, A. Assessment of physical inactivity and perceived barriers to physical activity among health college students, south-western Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr. Health J. 2014, 20, 596–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Althumiri, N.A.; BinDhim, N.F.; Alqahtani, S.A. Prevalence of physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors and associations with obesity among Saudi Adults. 2020. Available online: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-40306/v1 (accessed on 2 May 2024).
  25. Alsunni, A.A.; Badar, A. Fruit and vegetable consumption and its determinants among Saudi university students. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2015, 10, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kazi, R.N.A.; El-Kashif, M.M.L.; Ahsan, S.M. Prevalence of salt rich fast food consumption: A focus on physical activity and incidence of hypertension among female students of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 2669–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Vision 2023. The Quality of Life Program. Available online: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/vision-2030/vrp/quality-of-life-program/ (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  28. Sarin, S.; Bantham, A.; Stack, M.E.; Motta, M. Lifestyle Medicine—Reframing the Role of Health and Fitness Professionals. ACSM’s Health Fit. J. 2023, 27, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thwaite, T.L.; Heidke, P.; Williams, S.L.; Vandelanotte, C.; Rebar, A.L.; Khalesi, S. Barriers to healthy lifestyle behaviors in Australian nursing students: A qualitative study. Nurs. Health Sci. 2020, 22, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gosadi, I.M.; Jareebi, M.A. Perceived Healthcare Priorities, Barriers, and Preferences When Selecting Private or Governmental Healthcare Services Among a Sample of University Affiliates from Saudi Arabia. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2024, 18, 931–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gosadi, I.M.; Makeen, A.M.; Jareebi, M.A.; Elmahdy, M.H.; El-Setouhy, M.; Salih, S.M.; Ahmed, A.E.; Abdelmola, A.; Jafar, R.J.; Mutaen, Y.A. Lifestyle Satisfaction Among Jazan University Employees: A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Lifestyle Choices and Influencing Factors. Cureus 2024, 16, e55338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lemeshow, S. Sample Size Determination in Health Studies: A Practical Manual; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Health. Saudi Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of Obesity, 1st ed.; Ministry of Health Portal: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  34. WHO. A Healthy Lifestyle—WHO Recommendations. Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---who-recommendations (accessed on 2 May 2024).
  35. Fox, A.; Feng, W.; Asal, V. What is driving global obesity trends? Globalization or “modernization”? Glob. Health 2019, 15, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Popkin, B.M.; Ng, S.W. The nutrition transition to a stage of high obesity and noncommunicable disease prevalence dominated by ultra-processed foods is not inevitable. Obes. Rev. 2022, 23, e13366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Abdelaal, M.; le Roux, C.W.; Docherty, N.G. Morbidity and mortality associated with obesity. Ann. Transl. Med. 2017, 5, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Okube, O.T.; Kimani, S.T. Effectiveness of Trans-Theoretical Model-Based Health Education Intervention in the Promotion of Lifestyle Changes among Adults with Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024, 10, 23779608241251658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jalilian, H.; Pezeshki, M.Z.; Janati, A.; Najafipour, F.; Imani, A.; Zozani, M.A.; Khodayari Zarnaq, R. Readiness for diet change and its association with diet knowledge and skills, diet decision making and diet barriers in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2019, 13, 2933–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peng, B.; Ng, J.Y.; Ha, A.S. Barriers and facilitators to physical activity for young adult women: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2023, 20, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kelly, M.P.; Barker, M. Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult? Public Health 2016, 136, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Finckenor, M.; Byrd-Bredbenner, C. Nutrition Intervention Group Program based on Preaction-stage–oriented Change Processes of the Transtheoretical Model Promotes Long-term Reduction in Dietary Fat Intake. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2000, 100, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. de Freitas, P.P.; de Menezes, M.C.; Dos Santos, L.C.; Pimenta, A.M.; Ferreira, A.V.M.; Lopes, A.C.S. The transtheoretical model is an effective weight management intervention: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Carlén, K.; Kylberg, E. An intervention of sustainable weight change: Influence of self-help group and expectations. Health Expect. 2021, 24, 1498–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schnettler, B.; Miranda, H.; Lobos, G.; Orellana, L.; Sepúlveda, J.; Denegri, M.; Etchebarne, S.; Mora, M.; Grunert, K.G. Eating habits and subjective well-being. A typology of students in Chilean state universities. Appetite 2015, 89, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lutz, L.J.; Gaffney-Stomberg, E.; Williams, K.W.; McGraw, S.M.; Niro, P.J.; Karl, J.P.; Cable, S.J.; Cropper, T.L.; McClung, J.P. Adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans Is Associated with Psychological Resilience in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2017, 117, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Schnettler, B.; Miranda, H.; Sepúlveda, J.; Denegri, M.; Mora, M.; Lobos, G. Satisfaction with Life and Food-Related Life in Persons of the Mapuche Ethnic Group in Southern Chile: A Comparative Analysis Using Logit and Probit Models. J. Happiness Stud. 2012, 13, 225–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saba, A.; Vassallo, M. The influence of health involvement and satisfaction on healthy food choices among people over 60 years. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2012, 36, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Poggiogalle, E.; Kiesswetter, E.; Romano, M.; Saba, A.; Sinesio, F.; Polito, A.; Moneta, E.; Ciarapica, D.; Migliaccio, S.; Suwalska, A.; et al. Psychosocial and cultural determinants of dietary intake in community-dwelling older adults: A Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity systematic literature review. Nutrition 2021, 85, 111131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, C.L.; Cho, D.; Moore, P.J. How does education lead to healthier behaviours? Testing the mediational roles of perceived control, health literacy and social support. Psychol Health 2018, 33, 1416–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 16 02246 g001
Figure 1. Median satisfaction level of various BMI categories. Error bars represent the interquartile range (IQR); BMI: body mass index; satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Figure 1. Median satisfaction level of various BMI categories. Error bars represent the interquartile range (IQR); BMI: body mass index; satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Nutrients 16 02246 g001
Nutrients 16 02246 g002
Figure 2. Median satisfaction level of various physical activity levels per week. Error bars represent the interquartile range (IQR); satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Figure 2. Median satisfaction level of various physical activity levels per week. Error bars represent the interquartile range (IQR); satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Nutrients 16 02246 g002
Nutrients 16 02246 g003
Figure 3. Median satisfaction level of various dietary habits. Error bars represent the interquartile range (IQR); * p < 0.05. Satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Figure 3. Median satisfaction level of various dietary habits. Error bars represent the interquartile range (IQR); * p < 0.05. Satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Nutrients 16 02246 g003
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported body measurements, and lifestyle behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported body measurements, and lifestyle behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
CharacteristicsMean ± SD
Age (years)21.00 ± 1.70
Height (cm) (Total)164.00 ± 9.30
   Male170.30 ± 6.56
   Female156.40 ± 5.81
Weight (kg) (Total)60.00 ± 16.00
   Male68.73 ± 16.32
   Female51.42 ± 10.36
BMI (kg/m2) a (Total)22.00 ± 4.70
   Male23.60 ± 5.02
   Female21.01 ± 4.01
CharacteristicsFrequency (%)
 Sex
 Male 1008 (51.51)
 Female 949 (48.49)
 Residence
Rural1011 (51.66)
Urban946 (48.34)
 Family income (monthly, SAR)
<50001207 (61.68)
5000–9999258 (13.18)
10,000–14,999236 (12.06)
≥15,000256 (13.08)
 Social status
Single1799 (91.93)
Married144 (7.36)
Divorced/widowed/widower14 (0.72)
 Family housing
Owned apartment444 (22.69)
Owned traditional474 (24.22)
Owned villa763 (38.99)
Rented276 (14.10)
 Smoking behaviors
Never smokers1661 (84.87)
Ex-smokers62 (3.17)
Current smokers100 (5.11)
Passive smokers134 (6.85)
 Khat chewing
Never used it1880 (96.07)
Ex-user50 (2.55)
Current user27 (1.38)
 BMI categories
Underweight410 (20.95)
Normal weight1049 (53.60)
Overweight362 (18.50)
Obese136 (6.95)
 Physical activity (weekly)
No physical activity717 (36.64)
<150 min718 (36.69)
≥150 min522 (26.67)
 Eating behaviors
Consumption of whole-grain products1065 (54.42)
Consuming 5 or more servings of fruits/vegetables (daily)513 (26.21)
Choosing low-fat meats939 (47.98)
Choosing low-fat products671 (34.29)
Avoiding foods high in sugar753 (38.48)
BMI: body mass index; cm: centimeter; kg: kilogram; SAR: Saudi Riyals; SD: standard deviation; a BMI was calculated using the standard formula of weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.
Table 2. Satisfaction levels across BMI categories, physical activity levels, and selected eating behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Table 2. Satisfaction levels across BMI categories, physical activity levels, and selected eating behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
CharacteristicsFrequency (%)Median (IQR)
BMI categories a Weight satisfaction #
   Underweight410 (20.95)6 (4, 9)
   Normal weight1049 (53.60)8 (5, 9)
   Overweight362 (18.50)5 (3, 7)
   Obese136 (6,95)2 (1, 4.25)
Physical activity (weekly) Physical activity satisfaction #
   No physical activity717 (36.64)3 (1, 4)
   <150 min718 (36.69)6 (5, 7)
   ≥150 min522 (26.67)8 (6, 10)
Eating behaviors Eating behaviors’ satisfaction #
Consumption of whole-grain products
   Yes1065 (54.42)6 (4, 8)
   No892 (45.58)5 (4, 8)
Consuming 5 or more servings of fruits/vegetables (daily)
   Yes513 (26.21)6 (5, 8)
   No1444 (73.79)5 (4, 7)
Choosing low-fat meats
   Yes938 (47.93)6 (5, 8)
   No1019 (52.07)5 (4, 7)
Choosing low-fat products
   Yes671 (34.29)6 (5, 8)
   No1286 (65.71)5 (4, 7)
Avoiding foods high in sugar
   Yes753 (38.48)6 (5, 8)
   No1204 (61.52)5 (4, 7)
BMI: body mass index; IQR, interquartile range. a BMI was calculated using the standard formula of weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. # Satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Table 3. The distribution of satisfaction level for weight, physical activity, and eating behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Table 3. The distribution of satisfaction level for weight, physical activity, and eating behaviors among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
CharacteristicsDissatisfied #
n (%)		Satisfied
n (%)
BMI categories a
   Underweight174 (42.44)236 (57.56)
   Normal weight268 (25.55)781 (74.45)
   Overweight198 (54.70)164 (45.30)
   Obese112 (82.35)24 (17.65)
Physical activity (weekly)
   No physical activity631 (88.01)86 (11,99)
   <150 min321 (44.71)397 (55.29)
   ≥150 min118 (22.61)404 (77.39)
Eating behaviors
Consumption of whole-grain products
   Yes489 (45.92)576 (54.08)
   No470 (52.69)422 (47.31)
Consuming 5 or more servings of fruits/vegetables (daily)
   Yes200 (38.99)313 (61.01)
   No795 (52.6)685 (47.4)
Choosing low-fat meats
   Yes384 (40.94)554 (59.06)
   No575 (56.43)444 (43.57)
Choosing low-fat products
   Yes258 (38.45)413 (61.55)
   No701 (54.51)585 (45.49)
Avoiding foods high in sugar
   Yes303 (40.24)450 (59.76)
   No656 (54.49)548 (45.51)
BMI: body mass index; n: sample size. a BMI was calculated using the standard formula of weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. # Satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Table 4. Logistic regression examining predictors of body weight satisfaction, physical activity satisfaction, and eating behaviors satisfaction among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Table 4. Logistic regression examining predictors of body weight satisfaction, physical activity satisfaction, and eating behaviors satisfaction among 1957 university students in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
CharacteristicsWeight Satisfaction #Physical Activity Satisfaction #Eating Behaviors Satisfaction #
PredictorsOR95% CIpOR95% CIpOR95% CIp
Age1.010.95–1.080.7301.091.02–1.160.0141.010.95–1.080.678
Sex [reference: female]
Male1.341.03–1.740.0321.200.90–1.610.2202.251.74–2.92<0.001
Social status [reference: single]
Married1.170.78–1.760.4520.810.52–1.260.3471.130.76–1.680.543
Family income (monthly, SAR) [reference: <5000]
5000–99990.570.41–0.800.0010.770.53–1.120.1701.010.73–1.390.975
10,000–14,9990.900.63–1.270.5410.670.45–0.980.0411.120.79–1.570.520
15,000 and more1.160.83–1.640.3840.900.62–1.300.5681.431.02–1.990.036
Residence [reference: rural]
Urban1.271.03–1.570.0261.190.95–1.500.1341.030.84–1.260.808
Smoking [reference: never smoked]
Current smokers0.800.49–1.320.3741.040.59–1.830.8940.690.43–1.120.137
Ex-smokers0.590.33–1.050.0700.560.29–1.070.0790.530.29–0.940.030
Passive smokers0.760.51–1.150.1890.870.56–1.360.5390.830.56–1.220.343
BMI category a [reference: normal weight]
Underweight0.350.24–0.51<0.0011.010.68–1.520.9431.030.72–1.470.863
Overweight0.420.28–0.64<0.0010.590.37–0.940.0260.550.37–0.830.004
Obese0.170.07–0.39<0.0010.410.16–1.000.0520.330.15–0.720.006
Physical activity (weekly) [reference: no physical activity]
<150 min1.230.98–1.550.0788.546.49–11.35<0.0011.641.31–2.06<0.001
≥150 min1.561.20–2.040.00122.6116.56–31.21<0.0012.021.57–2.60<0.001
Eating Behaviors:
Consumption of whole grain products1.150.94–1.410.1751.040.83–1.290.7551.361.12–1.660.002
Consuming 5 or more servings of fruits/vegetables (daily)1.010.81–1.280.9061.331.04–1.710.0241.581.27–1.98<0.001
Choosing low-fat meats1.050.86–1.290.6101.180.95–1.480.1401.611.32–1.95<0.001
Choosing low-fat products1.230.99–1.520.0661.361.08–1.710.0101.671.36–2.06<0.001
Avoiding food high in sugar1.110.90–1.370.3261.301.04–1.630.0241.581.29–1.93<0.001
R20.1520.3260.140
BMI: body mass index; SAR: Saudi Riyals. a BMI was calculated using the standard formula of weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. # Satisfaction was defined by a score of 5 or higher on a 10-point scale, while dissatisfaction was a score below 5.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muaddi, M.A.; Makeen, A.M.; Gosadi, I.M.; Jareebi, M.A.; Alharbi, A.A.; Bahri, A.A.; Ryani, M.A.; Mahfouz, M.S.; Albasheer, O.; Ali, S.A.; et al. Satisfaction Paradoxes in Health Behaviors: Contrasting Patterns across Weight, Physical Activity and Dietary Habits. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142246

AMA Style

Muaddi MA, Makeen AM, Gosadi IM, Jareebi MA, Alharbi AA, Bahri AA, Ryani MA, Mahfouz MS, Albasheer O, Ali SA, et al. Satisfaction Paradoxes in Health Behaviors: Contrasting Patterns across Weight, Physical Activity and Dietary Habits. Nutrients. 2024; 16(14):2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muaddi, Mohammed A., Anwar M. Makeen, Ibrahim M. Gosadi, Mohammad A. Jareebi, Abdullah A. Alharbi, Ahmed A. Bahri, Majed A. Ryani, Mohamed Salih Mahfouz, Osama Albasheer, Suhaila A. Ali, and et al. 2024. "Satisfaction Paradoxes in Health Behaviors: Contrasting Patterns across Weight, Physical Activity and Dietary Habits" Nutrients 16, no. 14: 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142246

APA Style

Muaddi, M. A., Makeen, A. M., Gosadi, I. M., Jareebi, M. A., Alharbi, A. A., Bahri, A. A., Ryani, M. A., Mahfouz, M. S., Albasheer, O., Ali, S. A., Arishi, A. A., Alsam, F. A., & Alqassim, A. Y. (2024). Satisfaction Paradoxes in Health Behaviors: Contrasting Patterns across Weight, Physical Activity and Dietary Habits. Nutrients, 16(14), 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop