Next Article in Journal
Identification of Crucial Residues in α-Conotoxin EI Inhibiting Muscle Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Next Article in Special Issue
Decontamination of Mycotoxin-Contaminated Feedstuffs and Compound Feed
Previous Article in Journal
Biological Stoichiometry Regulates Toxin Production in Microcystis aeruginosa (UTEX 2385)
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Activity of Neem (Azadirachta indica) Oil on Growth and Ochratoxin A Production by Aspergillus carbonarius Isolates
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/toxins11100602
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Calcination Enhances the Aflatoxin and Zearalenone Binding Efficiency of a Tunisian Clay

by
Roua Rejeb
1,2,*,
Gunther Antonissen
2,3,
Marthe De Boevre
4,
Christ’l Detavernier
4,
Mario Van de Velde
4,
Sarah De Saeger
4,
Richard Ducatelle
2,
Madiha Hadj Ayed
1 and
Achraf Ghorbal
5
1
Université de Sousse, Institut Supérieur Agronomique de Chott-Mariem, LR18AG01, ISA-CM-BP, 47, Sousse 4042, Tunisia
2
Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of veterinary medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
3
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
4
Department of Bioanalysis, Centre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
5
Research Laboratory LR18ES33, National Engineering School of Gabes, University of Gabes, Avenue Omar Ibn El Khattab, Gabes 6029, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2019, 11(10), 602; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11100602
Submission received: 3 September 2019 / Revised: 7 October 2019 / Accepted: 14 October 2019 / Published: 16 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycotoxin Contamination Management Tools and Efficient Strategies in Feed Industry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Clays are known to have promising adsorbing characteristics, and are used as feed additives to overcome the negative effects of mycotoxicosis in livestock farming. Modification of clay minerals by heat treatment, also called calcination, can alter their adsorption characteristics. Little information, however, is available on the effect of calcination with respect to mycotoxin binding. The purpose of this study was to characterize a Tunisian clay before and after calcination (at 550 °C), and to investigate the effectiveness of the thermal treatment of this clay on its aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), G1 (AFG1), B2 (AFB2), G2 (AFG2), and zearalenone (ZEN) adsorption capacity. Firstly, the purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC) were characterized with X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-IR), cation exchange capacity (CEC), specific surface area (SBET), and point of zero charge (pHPZC) measurements. Secondly, an in vitro model that simulated the pH conditions of the monogastric gastrointestinal tract was used to evaluate the binding efficiency of the tested clays when artificially mixed with aflatoxins and zearalenone. The tested clay consisted mainly of smectite and illite. Purified and calcined clay had similar chemical compositions. After heat treatment, however, some changes in the mineralogical and textural properties were observed. The calcination decreased the cation exchange capacity and the specific surface, whereas the pore size was increased. Both purified and calcined clay had a binding efficacy of over 90% for AFB1 under simulated poultry GI tract conditions. Heat treatment of the clay increased the adsorption of AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2 related to the increase in pore size of the clay by the calcination process. ZEN adsorption also increased by calcination, albeit to a more stable level at pH 3 rather than at pH 7. In conclusion, calcination of clay minerals enhanced the adsorption of aflatoxins and mostly of AFG1 and AFG2 at neutral pH of the gastrointestinal tract, and thus are associated with protection against the toxic effects of aflatoxins.
Keywords:
aflatoxins; zearalenone; clay; purified; calcined; adsorption; pH
Key Contribution: In vitro binding capacity of purified and calcined clay was determined for AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2 and ZEN in the pH of the poults gastrointestinal tract. The calcined clay has successfully improved the binding efficiency of AFB2, AFG1, AFG2 and ZEN.

1. Introduction

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by toxigenic fungi growing on a wide range of agricultural products [1]. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations stated that nearly 25% of the cereal products is contaminated with mycotoxins [2].
Aflatoxins (AFs) are considered as the most important mycotoxins in food and feed because of their carcinogenicity (IARC monograph class I) and their high prevalence, especially in Southern regions [3,4]. AFs are a group of heterocyclic metabolites that are mainly produced by members of the genus Aspergillus, contaminating agricultural commodities. Aspergillus fungi are both found in the field as storage pathogens, therefore the AFs’ content is omnipresent, but with a tendency to increase during storage [5,6]. AFs cause serious health problems, economic losses, and deleterious effects on performance in a variety of farm animals including pigs, poultry, and cattle [7]. More specifically in poultry, AFs reduce the growth rate, decrease egg production, induce changes in organ weight, and increase the risk of disease [4]. In young chicks, AFs reduce immune competence and cause liver damage [8,9,10]. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is the most potent of the aflatoxins, followed by AFG1, AFB2, and AFG2 [11]. AFB1 comprise a greater potency associated with the cyclopentenone ring of the B series, when compared with the six-membered lactone ring of the G series [12].
Zearalenone (ZEN) is a phenolic resorcyclic acid lactone mycotoxin produced by Fusarium fungi growing on cereal grains and derived products worldwide. Fusarium mycotoxins are primarily produced before harvest, on the field. ZEN is a potent estrogenic metabolite as it has the ability to bind to estrogen receptors and induces estrogenic alterations including uterine enlargement, swelling of the vulva and mammary glands, and pseudopregnancy [13,14].
To offset the negative effects of mycotoxins on animal health, a wide range of mycotoxin decontamination strategies has been reported in the literature [15,16,17]. Adding mycotoxin binders to the feed is probably the most common post-harvest mitigation approach [18,19,20]. Binders decrease the absorption of mycotoxins from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract into the blood circulation and target organs by adsorbing them on their surface [21], forming a binder-toxin complex which is eliminated through the fecal material [22]. Inclusion of mycotoxin binders improves the average daily gain and the average daily feed intake in pigs and reduced the injurious effect of AFs on body weight, feed conversion ratio (FCR), serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and urea concentration in broiler chickens [8,23]. However, it should be noted that adding a high dose of clay in the feed might cause nutrient deficiency by adsorbing micronutrients, vitamins and organic compounds, while also having negative effects on the bioavailability of minerals and trace elements [15,24]. In addition, the risk of the contamination of raw clays with metals and dioxins has to be considered [25]. Among mycotoxin binders, clay minerals are the largest group. Several aluminosilicate clays such as hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS), bentonite, montmorillonite, smectite, and zeolite have good binding efficiency to mycotoxins [26,27]. These clays mostly bind small mycotoxins, such as AFs and ochratoxin A, but have less binding affinity for the larger molecules of certain Fusarium toxins. ZEN can be adsorbed by only a limited number of binders with a large variation in binding capacity [28]. Effectiveness of binding also depends on the type, and the dosage of the binders. A Brazilian study showed that about 64% of the products on the market were ineffective in binding AFs [29,30].
Clays are used in their natural state or treated through various processes such as calcination, acid activation, pillaring, organic modification with polymers, or cation and anion exchange. These modified clays can be more effective in binding some mycotoxins than the untreated clay [31,32,33,34]. Calcination is a process in which clay minerals are heated to different temperatures [33]. It removes the water located in intra-crystalline tunnels, which changes the pore structure and surface proprieties [35,36]. Consequently, heat treatment has an impact on the specific surface area of clay, which is responsible for the adsorption capacity [37]. Calcined clays have been used in numerous studies as adsorbents to eliminate heavy metals and cationic dyes [38,39].
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, only one study investigated the effect of calcination on mycotoxin binding [40]. In this paper it was reported that the adsorption of AFB1 was reduced after calcination of a bentonite clay. It is questionable whether this observation can be extrapolated to other types of clay and other mycotoxins. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to analyze the physical characteristics and to evaluate the binding of different mycotoxins before and after calcination of a montmorillonite type of clay from Tunisia.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Characterization

XRF analyses revealed that purified native clay (CP) and its calcined form (CC) were mainly composed of silicon dioxide (SiO2), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), calcium oxide (CaO) and iron oxide (Fe2O3) (Table 1). In addition, the occurrence of magnesium oxide in both samples can be due to the presence of smectite, and also to a small amount of dolomite, which is confirmed by the results of XRD and FTIR-IR [41].

2.2. Infrared Spectroscopy Characterization (FTIR-ATR)

The FTIR patterns of the CP (Figure 1) exhibits several characteristic bands corresponding to the stretching vibrations of the surface hydroxyl groups (Si–Si–OH, or Al–Al–OH) at 3695 cm−1 which indicates the presence of kaolinite [40,41,42,43,44]. The spectrum shows a characteristic band of montmorillonite at 3620 cm−1 [43]. The band at 1432 cm−1 corresponds to carbonate [calcite (Ca CO3) or dolomite (Ca, Mg (CO3)2)] [44,45,46]. The band at 711 cm−1 corresponds to calcite [44,45]. The band at 518 cm−1 is due to Si–O–Al (octahedral) bending vibration [46,47]. Vibration at 1635 cm−1 was attributed to the bending of adsorbed water. The band of deformation near to 873 cm−1 indicates that the clay is octahedral [48], while the band near 910 cm−1 corresponds to an Al-O-H deformation characteristic of dioctahedral smectite [49].
After calcination, the water OH-bending (1635 cm−1) mode totally disappeared. This is a consequence of dehydroxylation and dehydration by the thermal treatment.

2.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD characterization as presented in Figure 2 showed that CP and CC consisted mainly of calcic smectite, as demonstrated by the main peak near 14.10 Å and the additional peaks at 4.48 Å and 2.56 Å [50]. The XRD patterns confirmed the presence of kaolinite by the basal spacing at 7.16 Å, 3.84 Å, and 3.57 Å [45,50,51]. The characteristic reflection of dolomite was observed at 2.89 Å [45], while that of calcite was observed at 3.03 Å and 1.90 Å [45,50,52]. Both clays were also characterized by the presence of quartz, indicated by several peaks at 4.25 Å, 3.34 Å, 2.28 Å, 2.09 Å, and 1.87 Å [47,48,53,54]. Following calcination, the characteristic peaks of kaolinite at 7.16 Å and 3.57 Å disappeared, while a new peak appeared at 9.91 Å.

2.4. Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC)

The thermal treatment resulted in a decreased CEC (9.28 Cmol(+) (kg−1) for CC) and a reduction in Ca, Mg and Na after calcination (Table 2).

2.5. BET Surface Analysis

Brauner-Emmett-Teller (BET) N2 adsorption/desorption analysis showed a surface area of CP 64.06 m2/g. Thermal treatment resulted in a decreased surface area: 44.42 m2/g for CC (Table 3) and an increase in pore size from 57.03 Å for CP to 66.72 Å for CC.

2.6. Point of Zero Charge (PZC)

As can be seen in Figure 3, the pHPZC of CP was 9.94, while it was 10.03 for the CC.

2.7. Mycotoxin Binding Efficiency

At pH of 3, CC and CP were able to bind 100% of AFB1. However, compared to CP, CC had a higher (p < 0.05) adsorption capacity for AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2 (Table 4). Moreover, CP was not able to bind ZEN at pH 3, while the calcinated clay did adsorb ZEN (p < 0.05). Table 5 contains the results of mycotoxin adsorption of the CP and CC at pH 7. The adsorption of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2 at pH 7 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) for CC compared to CP. As almost no ZEN was bound to CP, the adsorption of ZEN at pH 7 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) for the CC (41 ± 12%) than the CP (1 ± 1%).
Based on these in vitro adsorption data, the in vitro binding efficiency of AFs and ZEN of the purified and calcined clay was predicted (Figure 4). The results show that both clays exhibited a strong in vitro binding affinity to AFs. Heat treatment of the clay improved the binding efficiency of ZEN (29 ± 18%) compared to the CP (0 ± 0%). The binding efficiency of AFB1 was 94 ± 3% and 99 ± 0% for the CP and CC, respectively. The effectiveness of CP and CC in binding AFB2 was 86 ± 9% and 99 ± 1%, respectively. The in vitro binding efficiency of AFG1 and AFG2 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) for the CC than the CP. AFG1 binding efficiency was 59 ± 18% for CP and 98 ± 2% for CC (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the binding efficiency of AFG2 was 15 ± 38% for the CP and 96 ± 2% for the CC. These results demonstrate that the thermal treatment of the clay enhances the binding efficiency of AFG1 and AFG2.

3. Discussion

Several reports have shown that adding phyllosilicate clay supplements to animal feed represents one of the most powerful prevention strategies for aflatoxicosis in livestock [21,55,56,57]. Heat treatment may alter the adsorbing properties of the clays, however, this has not been investigated much with respect to mycotoxins so far.
Our results show that the chemical composition of the studied clay was not affected after heat treatment. Similar results were found in another study with a different type of clay [40]. Indeed, there is no change in bentonite composition before and after calcination. The chemical composition of the studied clay is a typical composition of south-eastern Tunisian clays [45]. CP and CC were also characterized by a high calcium oxide content and a low percentage of sodium oxide which are in accordance with previous work [48].
Disappearance of the characteristic peaks of kaolinite following calcination, as observed by XRD, is probably due to the dehydroxylation of the kaolinite structure, leading to the collapse of clay mineral structure [40,50,58]. Aluminosilicate minerals are characterized by a CEC varying from 10 (meq/100 g) for kaolinite minerals to 100 (meq/100 g) for illite and smectite minerals [59]. The tested clay showed a low value of CEC which can be due to the poor crystallinity of smectite and to the presence of kaolinite, illite, and some impurities (calcite, quartz, dolomite, etc.). The decrease in CEC is due to the dehydration and dehydroxylation of smectite which results in a collapse of the interlayer [53,60]. This result is in agreement with previous reports [34,61] stating that the thermal treatment reduces the cation exchange capacity of clays. The surface area is an important property for clay adsorption capacity. Previous work reported that the surface area decreases with increasing temperatures of thermal treatment [33,46,54]. Calcination of clay at 560 °C causes an agglomeration of the particles leading to a 15% decrease in the surface area and an increase in the pore size [62]. According to the literature [35], the increase in the diameter of pores is due to a reduction of the basal spacing through dehydration of the interlayer spaces which is a consequence of a first collapse of smectite layers. Similar research observed that calcination of clay affects the interlayer space [63,64]. The pHPZC is an important characteristic of minerals and usually used to define the state of the surface of a dispersed solid phase at the solid-electrolyte solution surface and may indicate the ionization of functional groups and their possible interaction with the mycotoxin molecules [65]. In addition, low-charge montmorillonites or other low-charge smectites would be more effective feed additives than higher-charge clays [34]. The surface is negative at pH>pHPZC, positive at pH<pHPZC and neutral at pH=pHPZC [66]. The obtained results for pHPZC in our study indicated that the surface of the studied clays is positive at pH3 and pH7 and are moderately higher than the pHPZC reported in the literature for Tunisian smectitec clays (8.2) [67]. The use of adsorbents mixed with food and feed is one of the prominent post-harvest approaches to protect against mycotoxins toxicity, which are supposed to bind efficiently mycotoxins in the gastrointestinal tract. In the current study, we evaluate the binding capacity of AFs and ZEN of purified and calcined clay. The in vitro ZEN and AFs adsorption is assessed at pH 3 and pH 7 which are representative for the GI tract of the monogastric animals. Similar models were successfully applied in previous in vitro experiments [21,59,68]. Regarding adsorption and desorption of ZEN, the adsorption of ZEN by clay is usually lower than aflatoxins [21]. This could be because of the low polarity of ZEN compared to AFs [19]. Furthermore, ZEN has a more spherical molecular geometry than the planar structure of AFs [18]. Moreover, in a recent study [21], it was reported that ZEN is significantly less adsorbed in alkaline than in acid and neutral conditions. De Mil et al. [18] suggested that the pH may influence the phenolic hydroxyl group of ZEN or the ionization-state of the functional groups of the mycotoxin binders, and thereby alter the adsorption by the ionic interactions.
Our findings confirmed a better adsorption capacity for ZEN for the calcined clay than the purified native clay. It has been reported that modified clays have been developed to improve ZEN adsorption, which provide sufficient space between the layers to react with mycotoxin with a relatively less polarity with the appropriate electrical charging [69,70,71,72]. These modified surface properties lead to greater hydrophobicity by exchanging the structural load balance cations with high molecular weight quaternary amines [27]. Feng et al. [73] have concluded that the modified clays have led to low desorption rates, with higher ZEN adsorption than the non-modified clay. The increase in adsorption capacity of AFs and ZEN with calcined clay in our study might be related to the increase in pore size (Table 3), and the decrease in CEC (Table 2) of clay after heat treatment at 550 °C. Chen et al. [35] reported that calcination of palygorskite at high temperatures improves dye adsorption efficiency, which is basically associated with a larger size and a wider size distribution of pores. In addition to the pore size, CEC play an important role in the adsorption phenomenon [18]. Exchangeable cations neutralize the interlayer charges in phyllosilicates, and are involved in the binding of AFB1 [7,74]. Deng et al. [75] suggested that layer charge density and the type of exchange cations have a distinct influence on the adsorption of AF. Recent research [43] demonstrated that heating of bentonite improves the clays’ adsorption affinity and capacity of AFB1, which is mainly because of the reduction of cation exchange capacity. Furthermore, AFB1 is a polar mycotoxin and contains ß-carbonyl, which is involved in the adsorption process [55]. According to Prapapanpong et al. [21], the adsorption process involves the exchange of electrons of the metallic cation on the surface of the adsorbent, especially the positive charge of calcium ions on each layer of clay. A hypothesis proposed by Jaynes et al. [76] discussed the possibility that aflatoxins can be captured at multiple locations on hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS) surfaces, as well as between HSCAS inter-layers.

4. Conclusions

In this study, calcination improved the adsorption efficacy of the clay for AFB2, AFG1, AFG2, and ZEN. The adsorption-desorption rate showed that the pH condition in the GI tract might influence ZEN adsorption rate. The authors conclude that this specific clay has the potential to be used as a mycotoxin binder in poultry and probably for other animal species.
Unraveling the exact binding-mechanism, including the verification of the kinetics of mycotoxin binders has to this day remained largely uninvestigated. However, these data are of crucial importance to further ameliorate mycotoxin binders’ efficacies, and to aim for a wider adaption of these mitigation strategies in both animals and humans.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Chemical Products and Reagents

Methanol (LC-MS/MS grade) and glacial acetic acid (LC-MS/MS grade were procured from Biosolve B.V. (Valkenswaard, The Netherlands). Acetic acid and ammonium acetate (analytical grade) were supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). A Milli-Q® SP Reagent water apparatus (Millipore; Brussels, Belgium) was used for water purification. For the mycotoxin standards, AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2 and ZEN were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Bornem, Belgium). Disinfectol® (denaturated ethanol + 5% ether) was supplied by Chem-Lab (Belgium). Mycotoxin standards were dissolved in methanol (1 mg/mL), and were storable for a minimum of 1 year at −18 °C. Other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade.

5.2. Source and Preparation of Clay

The raw clay sample was collected from Jebel Aïdoudi (El Hamma, Gabes) in the southern part of Tunisia. To purify the clay, the sample was ground and wet-sieved with an electromagnetic sieve shaker (Matest S.p.A., Triviolo, Italy) in order to eliminate all the impurities. Next, they were dried in an oven (Memmert GmbH + Co.KG, Schwabach, Germany) at 105 °C. The obtained clay was subsequently washed with distilled water until separation of the liquid/solid phases became difficult, and were dried again in an oven at 105 °C. The thermally-treated clay was obtained by a calcination process of the purified clay in a muffle furnace (Sirio Dentel Srl, Meldola, Italy) at 550 °C for 5h. Subsequently, purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC) samples were ground and sieved into fine powder (≈100 µm).

5.3. Physico-Chemical Characterization of Clays

5.3.1. X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)

The chemical composition of the minerals present in the two clays was performed using the XRF spectrometer model Thermo OASIS 9900 (Thermo Fisher Scientific (Schweiz) AG, Bâle, Suisse). It was performed in order to know the elemental oxides that are present in the clays.

5.3.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD was performed to identify the mineral composition of clays and the crystal line phases. It was conducted by an X-ray diffractometer « PANALYTICAL X’PERT PROMPD » using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) with the voltage of 45 kV, 40 mA. Then the basal spacing of samples was determined from Bragg’s law (n λ= 2 d sin θ), where ‘n’ is the path difference between the reflected waves, equal to an integral number of wavelengths (λ), ‘λ’ the wavelength (nm), ‘d’ the interlayer spacing (nm), and ‘θ’ the diffraction angle (°).

5.3.3. Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR)

FTIR-IR helps in the identification of various forms of the minerals present in the clay. The vibrational spectra were performed with FTIR with a Spectrum Two PerkinElmer spectrometer, in the attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode, with a highly sensitive Deuterated Triglycine Sulfate (DTGS) detector. The samples were scanned 10 times in the range of 500–4000 cm−1, with a 2 cm−1 spectral resolution.

5.3.4. Point of Zero Charge (PZC)

The Chemistry surface characterization was performed according to the solid addition method described by Noridine et al. [77] with slight modifications. A series of 50 mL of 0.01 mol/mL of NaCl (0.1 M) solutions were poured in beakers. The pH was adjusted in the range of 2–12 with 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH solutions. Then, 0.2 g of clay was soaked in each solution under agitation at room temperature, and the final pH was measured after 24 h. The pHPZC is the point in the curve when the pHinitial (pHi) verses pHfinal (pHf) intersects the line (pHi = pHf).

5.3.5. Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC)

CEC of clays was conducted using the barium chloride method [78]. Briefly, samples between 1 g and 5 g, depending on their probable CEC, were weighed into 50 mL centrifuge tubes. Then, 30 mL of 0.1 M BaCl2 was added, and the tubes were shaken slowly on a reciprocal shaker for 2 h. The samples were then centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant solution were filtered through Whatman 42 filter paper. The solution was collected in polyethylene bottles for analysis.

5.3.6. BET Surface Analysis

The textural properties of the clays (specific surface area, porosity) were determined by nitrogen adsorption using the multipoint Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) method (ASAP 2020 Micromeritics Instruments, Norcross, GA, USA). The specific surface area was measured at 77 K and the pore size distribution was calculated in the radius range from 2000 to 100,000 nm by the BJH method using the adsorption isotherm.

5.4. Mycotoxin Adsorption

In vitro evaluation of the adsorption capacity of both clays for AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2, and ZEN was adopted from Di Mavungu et al. [79] with slight modifications. To determine the effect of pH on the mycotoxin binding capacity within the pH range of the gastrointestinal tract of poults, tests were performed at pH 3 and 7. In brief, 50 mg of clay sample was shaken and incubated for 3 h in 10 mL citrate buffer (pH 3) or phosphate buffer (pH 7) together with AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2 at a concentration of 5 ng/mL, or with ZEN at a concentration of 25 ng/mL.
The mycotoxins were determined by LC-MS/MS using previously described methods [80]. A Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled to a Quattro Premier XE mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a Z-spray electrospray ionization (ESI) interface was used for the determination and quantification of mycotoxins. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Symmetry C18 column (5 µm, 150 × 2.1 mm i.d.) with a Sentry guard column (3.5 µm, 10 × 2.1 mm i.d.) both supplied by Waters (Zellik, Belgium). The column was kept at room temperature. A mobile phase consisting of eluents A [water/methanol/acetic acid (94/5/1, v/v/v) containing 5 mM ammonium acetate] and B [methanol/water/ acetic acid (97/2/1, v/v/v) containing 5 mM ammonium acetate] was used at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1. A gradient elution was applied as follows: 0–7 min, 95% A/5% B –35% A/65% B; 7–11 min, 35% A/65% B–25% A/75% B; 11–13 min, 25% A/75% B–0% A/ 100% B; 13–15 min, 0% A/100% B; 15–16 min, 0% A/ 100% B–40% A/60% B; 16–22min, 40% A/60% B–60% A/40% B; 22–23 min, 60% A/40% B–95% A/5% B; 23–25 min 95% A/5% B. The injection volume was 20 µL.

5.5. Calculation of Mycotoxin Adsorption Rate (%)

The percentage of adsorption rate was calculated according to the following equation:
% binding capacity= 100 × (Ci − Cf)/Ci
where
Ci is the initial concentration of mycotoxin
Cf is the concentration of unbound mycotoxin after incubation period

5.6. Calculation of the Binding Efficiency

The binding efficiency of the clays was determined according to the obtained results of the adsorption and desorption rate ((1) and (2))
% Desorption = ((% Adsorption pH3 − % Adsorption pH7)/% Adsorption pH3) × 100
with
% binding efficiency = % Adsorption − % Desorption

5.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the statistical software SPSS version 24 (IBM, New York, NY, USA) and results are presented as means ± SD. All analyses were performed in triplicate, and the significance of the means value was performed with the student’s t-test after determination of normality. Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Author Contributions

R.R. perform the extraction, preparation, and characterization of clays, contribute in the mycotoxin binding experiment and was involved in all aspect of this study. G.A. secured, premise and set the mycotoxin binding experiment and reviewed the paper. M.D.B. and S.D.S. reviewed data of the mycotoxin binding experiment and reviewed the paper. M.V.d.V. performed the experiment of the mycotoxin binding capacity. C.D. collected the data of the mycotoxin binding experiment. R.D. supervised editing and reviewed the entire work. M.H.A. who proposed the initial idea of studying the characteristics of the Tunisian clays and their efficiency in poultry feeds, helped in performing the characterization of clays and reviewed the paper. A.G. supervised the preparation and a part of the characterization of clays.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to Professor Maher Radaoui and Sana Ncib who helped us in doing the BET and DRX analyses of clays. We would like to thank Imen Yehmed for doing the XRF analyses of clays. The authors acknowledge the support of MYTOX-SOUTH (https://mytoxsouth.org).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bryden, W.L. Mycotoxins in the food chain: Human health implications. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 16 (Suppl. 1), 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jard, G.; Liboz, T.; Mathieu, F.; Guyonvarch, A.; Lebrihi, A. Review of mycotoxin reduction in food and feed: From prevention in the field to detoxification by adsorption or transformation. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2011, 28, 1590–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Peng, W.X.; Marchal, J.L.M.; Van der Poel, A.F.B. Strategies to prevent and reduce mycotoxins for compound feed manufacturing. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 237, 129–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rawal, S.; Kim, J.E.; Coulombe, R., Jr. Research in Veterinary Science Aflatoxin B 1 in poultry: Toxicology, metabolism and prevention. Res. Vet. Sci. 2010, 89, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wacoo, A.P.; Wendiro, D.; Vuzi, P.C.; Hawumba, J.F. Methods for Detection of Aflatoxins in Agricultural Food Crops. J. Appl. Chem. 2014, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Scheidegger, K.A.; Payne, G.A. Unlocking the Secrets Behind Secondary Metabolism: A Review of Aspergillus flavus from Pathogenicity to Functional Genomics. J. Toxicol. Toxin Rev. 2003, 22, 423–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phillips, T.D.; Williams, J.; Huebner, H.; Ankrah, N.; Jolly, P.; Johnson, N.; Taylor, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, J. Reducing human exposure to aflatoxin through the use of clay: A review. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2008, 25, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhatti, S.A.; Khan, M.; Kashif, M.; Saqib, M. Aflatoxicosis and Ochratoxicosis in Broiler Chicks and their Amelioration with Locally Available Bentonite Clay. Pak. Vet. J. 2016, 36, 68–72. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khanian, M.; Allameh, A. Alleviation of aflatoxin-related oxidative damage to liver and improvement of growth performance in broiler chickens consumed Lactobacillus plantarum 299v for entire growth period. Toxicon 2018, 158, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, Q.; Li, Y.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wei, H.; Ji, C.; Zhang, J. Molecular Mechanisms of Lipoic Acid Protection against Aflatoxin B 1 -Induced Liver Oxidative Damage and Inflammatory Responses in Broilers. Toxins 2015, 7, 5435–5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wogan, G.N. Chemical Nature and Biological Effects of the Aflatoxins. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1966, 30, 460–470. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dutton, F. Cellular Interactions and Metabolism of Aflatoxin: An Update. Pharmacol. Ther. 1995, 65, 163–192. [Google Scholar]
  13. Antonissen, G.; Martel, A.; Pasmans, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Verbrugghe, E.; Vandenbroucke, V.; Li, S.; Haesebrouck, F.; Van Immerseel, F.; Croubels, S. The impact of Fusarium Mycotoxins on human and animal host susceptibility to infectious diseases. Toxins 2014, 6, 430–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tamura, M.; Mochizuki, N.; Nagatomi, Y.; Harayama, K.; Toriba, A.; Hayakawa, K. A method for simultaneous determination of 20 fusarium toxins in cereals by high-resolution liquid chromatography-orbitrap mass spectrometry with a pentafluorophenyl column. Toxins 2015, 7, 1664–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kolosova, A.; Stroka, J. Substances for reduction of the contamination of feed by mycotoxins: A review. World Mycotoxin J. 2011, 4, 225–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aiko, V.; Mehta, A. Occurrence, detection and detoxification of mycotoxins. J. Biosci. 2015, 40, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kabak, B.; Dobson, A.D.W.; Var, I. Strategies to prevent mycotoxin contamination of food and animal feed: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 593–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Mil, T.; Devreese, M.; Bagane, M.; Van Ranst, E.; Eeckhout, M.; De Backer, P.; Croubels, S. Characterization of 27 Mycotoxin Binders and the Relation with in Vitro Zearalenone Adsorption at a Single Concentration. Toxins 2015, 7, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huwig, A.; Freimund, S.; Käppeli, O.; Dutler, H. Mycotoxin detoxication of animal feed by different adsorbents. Toxicol. Lett. 2001, 122, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bocarov-Stancic, A.; Adamovic, M.; Salma, N.; Bodroza-Solarov, M.; Vuckovic, J.; Pantic, V. In vitro efficacy of mycotoxins adsorption by natural mineral adsorbents. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2011, 27, 1241–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prapapanpong, J.; Udomkusonsri, P.; Mahavorasirikul, W.; Choochuay, S.; Tansakul, N. In Vitro Studies on Gastrointestinal Monogastric and Avian Models to Evaluate the Binding Efficacy of Mycotoxin adsorbents by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2019, 6, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mutua, F.; Lindahl, J.; Grace, D. Availability and use of mycotoxin binders in selected urban and Peri-urban areas of Kenya. Food Secur. 2019, 11, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Clarke, L.C.; Sweeney, T.; Curley, E.; Duffy, S.K.; Vigors, S.; Rajauria, G.; O’Doherty, J.V. Mycotoxin binder increases growth performance, nutrient digestibility and digestive health of finisher pigs offered wheat based diets grown under different agronomical conditions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 240, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barrientos-velázquez, A.L.; Arteaga, S.; Dixon, J.B.; Deng, Y. The effects of pH, pepsin, exchange cation, and vitamins on a fl atoxin adsorption on smectite in simulated gastric fl uids. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 120, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jouany, J.P. Methods for preventing, decontaminating and minimizing the toxicity of mycotoxins in feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 137, 342–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kang’Ethe, E.K.; Sirma, A.J.; Murithi, G.; Mburugu-Mosoti, C.K.; Ouko, E.O.; Korhonen, H.J.; Nduhiu, G.J.; Mungatu, J.K.; Joutsjoki, V.; Lindfors, E.; et al. Occurrence of mycotoxins in food, feed, and milk in two counties from different agro-ecological zones and with historical outbreak of aflatoxins and fumonisins poisonings in Kenya. Food Qual. Saf. 2017, 1, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Papaioannou, D.; Katsoulos, P.D.; Panousis, N.; Karatzias, H. The role of natural and synthetic zeolites as feed additives on the prevention and/or the treatment of certain farm animal diseases: A review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2005, 84, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Avantaggiato, G.; Solfrizzo, M.; Visconti, A. Recent advances on the use of adsorbent materials for detoxification of Fusarium mycotoxins. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mallmann, C.A.; Dilkin, P. Brazilian mycotoxin experiences. Int. Pig Top. 2002, 27, 28–30. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zaviezo, D. Brazilian experiences with mycotoxins. Int. Poult. Prod. 2009, 17, 2–3. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cheknane, B.; Bouras, O.; Baudu, M.; Basly, J.P.; Cherguielaine, A. Granular inorgano-organo pillared clays (GIOCs): Preparation by wet granulation, characterization and application to the removal of a Basic dye (BY28) from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 158, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sassi, H.; Lafaye, G.; Ben Amor, H.; Gannouni, A.; Jeday, M.R. Wastewater treatment by catalytic wet air oxidation process over Al-Fe pillared clays synthesized using microwave irradiation. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tlili, A.; Saidi, R.; Fourati, A.; Ammar, N.; Jamoussi, F. Mineralogical study and properties of natural and flux calcined porcelanite from Gafsa-Metlaoui basin compared to diatomaceous filtration aids. Appl. Clay Sci. 2012, 62, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jaynes, W.F.; Zartman, R.E. Aflatoxin Toxicity Reduction in Feed by Enhanced Binding to Surface-Modified Clay Additives. Toxin 2011, 3, 551–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, H.; Zhao, J.; Zhong, A.; Jin, Y. Removal capacity and adsorption mechanism of heat-treated palygorskite clay for methylene blue. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 174, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kuang, W.; Facey, G.A.; Detellier, C. Dehydration and rehydration of palygorskite and the influence of water on the nanopores. Clays Clay Miner. 2004, 52, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, W.; Chen, H.; Wang, A. Adsorption characteristics of Cd(II) from aqueous solution onto activated palygorskite. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 55, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, T.; Liu, H.; Li, J.; Chen, D.; Chang, D.; Kong, D.; Frost, R.L. Effect of thermal treatment on adsorption-desorption of ammonia and sulfur dioxide on palygorskite: Change of surface acid-alkali properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 166, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vieira, M.G.A.; Neto, A.F.A.; Gimenes, M.L.; da Silva, M.G.C. Removal of nickel on Bofe bentonite calcined clay in porous bed. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 176, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nones, J.; Nones, J.; Gracher, H.; Poli, A.; Gonçalves, A.; Cabral, N. Thermal treatment of bentonite reduces aflatoxin b1 adsorption and affects stem cell death. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 55, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Felhi, M.; Tlili, A.; Gaied, M.E.; Montacer, M. Mineralogical study of kaolinitic clays from Sidi El Bader in the far north of Tunisia. Appl. Clay Sci. 2008, 39, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hajjaji, M.; Kacim, S.; Alami, A.; El Bouadili, A.; El Mountassir, M. Chemical and mineralogical characterization of a clay taken from the Moroccan Meseta and a study of the interaction between its fine fraction and methylene blue. Appl. Clay Sci. 2001, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gan, F.; Hang, X.; Huang, Q.; Deng, Y. Assessing and modifying China bentonites for aflatoxin adsorption. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 168, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sdiri, A.; Higashi, T.; Hatta, T. Mineralogical and spectroscopic characterization, and potential environmental use of limestone from the Abiod formation, Tunisia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61, 1275–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sdiri, A.; Higashi, T.; Hatta, T.; Jamoussi, F.; Tase, N. Evaluating the adsorptive capacity of montmorillonitic and calcareous clays on the removal of several heavy metals in aqueous systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chaari, I.; Fakhfakh, E.; Chakroun, S.; Bouzid, J.; Boujelben, N. Lead removal from aqueous solutions by a Tunisian smectitic clay. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 156, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Temuujin, J.; Jadambaa, T.; Burmaa, G.; Erdenechimeg, S.; Amarsanaa, J. Characterisation of acid activated montmorillonite clay from Tuulant (Mongolia). Ceram. Int. 2004, 30, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bouguerra, S.; Neji Mahmoud Trabelsi, M.H.F. Activation d’une argile smectite Tunisienne à l’acide sulfurique: Catalytique de l’acide adsorbé par l’argile. J. De La Société Chim. De Tunis. 2009, 11, 191–203. [Google Scholar]
  49. Madejová, J. FTIR techniques in clay mineral studies. Vib. Spectrosc. 2003, 31, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gannouni, A.; Amari, A.; Bellagi, A. Activation acide de quelques argiles du sud tunisien: II. Préparation de terres décolorantes pour huiles minérales usagées. J. Société Chim. Tunis. 2011, 13, 157–171. [Google Scholar]
  51. Khalfa, L.; Cervera, M.L.; Souissi-Najjar, S.; Bagane, M. Removal of Fe(III) from synthetic wastewater into raw and modified clay: Experiments and models fitting. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Eloussaief, M.; Hamza, W.; Kallel, N.; Benzina, M. Wastewaters Decontamination: Mechanisms of Pb ( II), Zn (II), and Cd (II) Competitive Adsorption on Tunisian Smectite in Single and Multi-Solute Systems. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2012, 32, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Önal, M. Swelling and cation exchange capacity relationship for the samples obtained from a bentonite by acid activations and heat treatments. Appl. Clay Sci. 2007, 37, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bojemueller, E.; Nennemann, A.; Lagaly, G. Enhanced pesticide adsorption by thermally modified bentonites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2001, 18, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Phillips, T.D. Dietary Clay in the Chemoprevention of Aflatoxin-Induced Disease. Toxicol. Sci. 1999, 52, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Valchev, I.; Marutsova, V.; Zarkov, I.; Ganchev, A.; Nikolov, Y. Effects of aflatoxin B 1 alone or co-administered with mycotox NG on performance and humoral immunity of Turkey broilers. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 2017, 20, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhatti, S.A.; Khan, M.Z.; Kashif, M.; Saqib, M.; Khan, A. Protective role of bentonite against aflatoxin B1- and ochratoxin A-induced immunotoxicity in broilers. J. Immunotoxicol. 2017, 14, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Danner, T.; Norden, G.; Justnes, H. Characterisation of calcined raw clays suitable as supplementary cementitious materials. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 162, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ayo, E.M.; Matemu, A.; Laswai, G.H.; Kimanya, M.E. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Capacity of Local Tanzanian Crude Clay and Ash-Based Materials in Binding Aflatoxins in Solution. Toxins 2018, 10, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gu, B.X.; Wang, L.M.; Minc, L.D.; Ewing, R.C. Temperature effects on the radiation stability and ion exchange capacity of smectites. J. Nucl. Mater. 2001, 297, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gurgel, M. Cu (II) Adsorption on Modified Bentonitic Clays: Different Isotherm Behaviors in Static and Dynamic Systems. Mater. Res. 2012, 15, 114–124. [Google Scholar]
  62. He, C.; Makovicky, E.; Osbæck, B. Thermal stability and pozzolanic activity of raw and calcined mixed-layer mica/smectite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2000, 17, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cótica, L.F.; Freitas, V.F.; Santos, I.A.; Barabach, M.; Anaissi, F.J.; Miyahara, R.Y.; Sarvezuk, P.W.C. Cobalt-modified Brazilian bentonites: Preparation, characterisation, and thermal stability. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 51, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, L.; Dong, J.; Lee, R. Preparation of α-alumina-supported mesoporous bentonite membranes for reverse osmosis desalination of aqueous solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 273, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Daković, A.; Kragović, M.; Rottinghaus, G.E.; Sekulić, Ž.; Milićević, S.; Milonjić, S.K.; Zarić, S. Influence of natural zeolitic tuff and organozeolites surface charge on sorption of ionizable fumonisin B1. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 76, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gulicovski, J.J.; Čerović, L.S.; Milonjić, S.K. Point of zero charge and isoelectric point of alumina. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2008, 23, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Arfaouia, S.; Hamdia, N.; Frini-Srasrab, N.; Srasra, E. Determination of point of zero charge of PILCS with single and mixed oxide pillars prepared from Tunisian-smectite. Geochem. Int. 2012, 50, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Daković, A.; Tomašević-Čanović, M.; Dondur, V.; Rottinghaus, G.E.; Medaković, V.; Zarić, S. Adsorption of mycotoxins by organozeolites. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2005, 46, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sabater-vilar, M.; Malekinejad, H.; Selman, M.H.J.; Fink-gremmels, J. In vitro assessment of adsorbents aiming to prevent deoxynivalenol and zearalenone mycotoxicoses. Mycopathologia 2007, 163, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Denli, M.; Blandon, J.C.; Guynot, M.E.; Salado, S.; Pérez, J.F. Efficacy of activated diatomaceous clay in reducing the toxicity of zearalenone in rats and piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jiang, S.Z.; Yang, Z.B.; Yang, W.R.; Wang, S.J.; Liu, F.X.; Johnston, L.A.; Chi, F.; Wang, Y. Effect of purified zearalenone with or without modified montmorillonite on nutrient availability, genital organs and serum hormones in post-weaning piglets. Livest. Sci. 2012, 144, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, Y.; Gao, R.; Liu, M.; Yan, C.; Shan, A. Adsorption of modified halloysite nanotubes in vitro and the protective effect in rats exposed to zearalenone. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2014, 68, 320–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Feng, J.; Shan, M.; Du, H.; Han, X.; Xu, Z. In vitro adsorption of zearalenone by cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide-modified montmorillonite nanocomposites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 113, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Deng, Y.; Velázquez, A.L.B.; Billes, F.; Dixon, J.B. Bonding mechanisms between aflatoxin B1 and smectite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Deng, Y.; Liu, L.; Velá Zquez, A.L.B.; Dixon, J.B. The determinative role of the exchange cation and layer-charge density of smectite on aflatoxin adsorption. Clays Clay Miner. 2012, 60, 374–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jaynes, W.F.; Zartman, R.E.; Hudnall, W.H. Aflatoxin B1 adsorption by clays from water and corn meal. Appl. Clay Sci. 2007, 36, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nordine, N.; El Bahri, Z.; Sehil, H.; Fertout, R.I.; Rais, Z.; Bengharez, Z. Lead removal kinetics from synthetic effluents using Algerian pine, beech and fir sawdust’s: Optimization and adsorption mechanism. Appl. Water Sci. 2016, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hendershot, W.H.; Duquette, M. A Simple Barium Chloride Method for Determining Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchangeable Cations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1986, 50, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. di Mavungu, J.D.; Monbaliu, S.; Scippo, M.L.; Maghuin-Rogister, G.; Schneider, Y.J.; Larondelle, Y.; Callebaut, A.; Robbens, J.; van Peteghem, C.; de Saeger, S. LC-MS/MS multi-analyte method for mycotoxin determination in food supplements. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2009, 26, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Monbaliu, S.; Van Poucke, C.; Van Peteghem, C.; Van Poucke, K.; Heungens, K.; De Saeger, S. Development of a multi-mycotoxin liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for sweet pepper analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 11 00602 g001 550
Figure 1. Infrared spectra of purified clay (CP) and calcinated clay (CC).
Figure 1. Infrared spectra of purified clay (CP) and calcinated clay (CC).
Toxins 11 00602 g001
Toxins 11 00602 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffractograms of purified and calcined clay (S: smectite, I: illite, K: kaolinite, Q: quartz, C: calcite, D: dolomite), CP: purified clay, CC: calcined clay.
Figure 2. X-ray diffractograms of purified and calcined clay (S: smectite, I: illite, K: kaolinite, Q: quartz, C: calcite, D: dolomite), CP: purified clay, CC: calcined clay.
Toxins 11 00602 g002
Toxins 11 00602 g003 550
Figure 3. Determination of point of zero charge of purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC).
Figure 3. Determination of point of zero charge of purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC).
Toxins 11 00602 g003
Toxins 11 00602 g004 550
Figure 4. In vitro binding efficiency (%) of AFB1 (5 ng/mL), AFB2 (5 ng/mL), AFG1 (5 ng/mL), AFG2 (5 ng/mL) and ZEN (25 ng/mL) of purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC). Data are represented as mean values ± SD. Means of CC indicated with * are significantly different compared to CP (p < 0.05)
Figure 4. In vitro binding efficiency (%) of AFB1 (5 ng/mL), AFB2 (5 ng/mL), AFG1 (5 ng/mL), AFG2 (5 ng/mL) and ZEN (25 ng/mL) of purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC). Data are represented as mean values ± SD. Means of CC indicated with * are significantly different compared to CP (p < 0.05)
Toxins 11 00602 g004
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of clays.
Table 1. Chemical composition of clays.
Oxide Composition of the Clays (%)
CPCC
SiO242.0443.62
Al2O314.6015.67
CaO13.3413.78
Fe2O311.039.69
K2O1.121.17
MgO1.741.78
Na2O0.180.18
SO30.180.16
CP: purified clay, CC: calcined clay.
Table
Table 2. Cation exchange capacity of purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC).
Table 2. Cation exchange capacity of purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC).
Clay SamplesCa (mg/L)K (mg/L)Mg (mg/L)Na (mg/L)CEC (Cmol(+)(kg−1))
CP126.1814.124.4417.9412.266
CC88.5625.561911.549.287
CP: purified clay, CC: calcined clay, CEC: cation exchange capacity.
Table
Table 3. Textural characteristic of clay minerals.
Table 3. Textural characteristic of clay minerals.
Clay SamplesSBET (m2/g)Pore Volume (cm3/g)Pore Size (Å)
CP64.060.0557.03
CC44.420.0566.72
SBET: BET Surface Area, CP: purified clay, CC: calcined clay.
Table
Table 4. In vitro adsorption of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2 and ZEN by purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC) at pH 3. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Means of CC indicated with * are significantly different compared to CP (p < 0.05). (NS: not significantly different).
Table 4. In vitro adsorption of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2 and ZEN by purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC) at pH 3. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Means of CC indicated with * are significantly different compared to CP (p < 0.05). (NS: not significantly different).
Binding Capacity (%)
MycotoxinsCPCCp-Value
AFB1100 ± 0100 ± 0NS
AFB288 ± 1100 ± 0 *<0.001
AFG196 ± 1100 ± 0 *<0.001
AFG276 ± 299 ± 1 *<0.001
ZEN0±075 ± 3 *<0.001
Table
Table 5. In vitro adsorption of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2 and ZEN by purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC) at pH 7. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Means of CC indicated with * are significantly different compared to CP (p < 0.05).
Table 5. In vitro adsorption of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2 and ZEN by purified clay (CP) and calcined clay (CC) at pH 7. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Means of CC indicated with * are significantly different compared to CP (p < 0.05).
Binding Capacity (%)
MycotoxinsCPCCp-Value
AFB194 ± 399 ± 0 *0.031
AFB286 ± 899 ± 1 *0.048
AFG160 ± 1798 ± 2 *0.019
AFG230 ± 2996 ± 2 *0.017
ZEN1 ± 141 ± 12 *0.026

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rejeb, R.; Antonissen, G.; De Boevre, M.; Detavernier, C.; Van de Velde, M.; De Saeger, S.; Ducatelle, R.; Hadj Ayed, M.; Ghorbal, A. Calcination Enhances the Aflatoxin and Zearalenone Binding Efficiency of a Tunisian Clay. Toxins 2019, 11, 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11100602

AMA Style

Rejeb R, Antonissen G, De Boevre M, Detavernier C, Van de Velde M, De Saeger S, Ducatelle R, Hadj Ayed M, Ghorbal A. Calcination Enhances the Aflatoxin and Zearalenone Binding Efficiency of a Tunisian Clay. Toxins. 2019; 11(10):602. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11100602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rejeb, Roua, Gunther Antonissen, Marthe De Boevre, Christ’l Detavernier, Mario Van de Velde, Sarah De Saeger, Richard Ducatelle, Madiha Hadj Ayed, and Achraf Ghorbal. 2019. "Calcination Enhances the Aflatoxin and Zearalenone Binding Efficiency of a Tunisian Clay" Toxins 11, no. 10: 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11100602

APA Style

Rejeb, R., Antonissen, G., De Boevre, M., Detavernier, C., Van de Velde, M., De Saeger, S., Ducatelle, R., Hadj Ayed, M., & Ghorbal, A. (2019). Calcination Enhances the Aflatoxin and Zearalenone Binding Efficiency of a Tunisian Clay. Toxins, 11(10), 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11100602

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop