Next Article in Journal
Two Novel Dermaseptin-Like Antimicrobial Peptides with Anticancer Activities from the Skin Secretion of Pachymedusa dacnicolor
Previous Article in Journal
Docking Simulation of the Binding Interactions of Saxitoxin Analogs Produced by the Marine Dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum to the Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Nav1.4
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 8
Issue 5
10.3390/toxins8050143
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Draft Genome Sequence of the Yersinia entomophaga Entomopathogenic Type Strain MH96T

by
Mark R. H. Hurst
1,*,
Amy Beattie
1,
Eric Altermann
2,3,
Roger M. Moraga
4,
Lincoln A. Harper
1,
Joanne Calder
1 and
Aurelie Laugraud
5
1
AgResearch, Farm Systems & Environment, Lincoln Research Centre, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
2
AgResearch Limited, Rumen Microbiology, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand
3
Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand
4
AgResearch Limited, Bioinformatics & Statistics, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand
5
AgResearch Limited, Bioinformatics & Statistics, Lincoln Research Centre, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2016, 8(5), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050143
Submission received: 24 March 2016 / Revised: 21 April 2016 / Accepted: 26 April 2016 / Published: 11 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Toxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Here we report the draft genome of Yersinia entomophaga type strain MH96T. The genome shows 93.8% nucleotide sequence identity to that of Yersinia nurmii type strain APN3a-cT, and comprises a single chromosome of approximately 4,275,531 bp. In silico analysis identified that, in addition to the previously documented Y. entomophaga Yen-TC gene cluster, the genome encodes a diverse array of toxins, including two type III secretion systems, and five rhs-associated gene clusters. As well as these multicomponent systems, several orthologs of known insect toxins, such as VIP2 toxin and the binary toxin PirAB, and distant orthologs of some mammalian toxins, including repeats-in-toxin, a cytolethal distending toxin, hemolysin-like genes and an adenylate cyclase were identified. The genome also contains a large number of hypothetical proteins and orthologs of known effector proteins, such as LopT, as well as genes encoding a wide range of proteolytic determinants, including metalloproteases and pathogen fitness determinants, such as genes involved in iron metabolism. The bioinformatic data derived from the current in silico analysis, along with previous information on the pathobiology of Y. entomophaga against its insect hosts, suggests that a number of these virulence systems are required for survival in the hemocoel and incapacitation of the insect host.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Yersinia is a genus of Gram-negative facultative anaerobes belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, of the gamma subdivision of Proteobacteria [1]. The Yersiniae have undergone extensive diversification during the course of their evolution, with pathogenic Yersinia species such as Y. pestis, the causative agent of bubonic plague [2], and Y. ruckeri, which causes enteric redmouth disease in salmonid fish [3], along with nonpathogenic species, such as Y. aldovae [4], being identified. Recent phylogenetic analysis has shown that Y. entomophaga MH96T is isogenic to Y. nurmii type strain APN3a-cT [5], which was isolated in Finland from packages of broiler meat cuts packaged under a modified atmosphere [6]. These strains, along with Y. ruckeri, form a discrete clade away from other Yersinia species [7,8]. The placing of Y. ruckeri within the genus Yersinia is still a matter of conjecture [9,10].
Y. entomophaga was originally isolated from the cadaver of a New Zealand grass grub, Costelytra zealandica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Y. entomophaga is consistently pathogenic by per os challenge to this host, as well as a wide range of lepidopteran, coleopteran, and orthopteran species, with death of the insect typically occurring within 2–5 days of ingestion [11,12]. Aside from hemocytes, there are no obvious sites of Y. entomophaga colonization in the insect [12,13]. At 37 °C, aggregates of Y. entomophaga were observed both in the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larval hemocoel and in vitro in Luria-Bertani broth. Electron microscopy of these in vitro cell aggregates revealed the presence of polar fimbriae [13].
The main virulence determinant of Y. entomophaga is an insect-active toxin complex (TC) derivative termed the Yen-TC, the genes encoding which are located on a pathogenicity island designated PAIYe96 [14]. The Yen-TC is comprised of seven subunit proteins: two TC-A-like proteins (YenA1 and YenA2) and two chitinases (Chi1 and Chi2), which combine to form a pentameric cage into which the TC-B-like protein (YenB) and one of the two Rhs elements (TC-C-like proteins YenC1 and YenC2) bind to form the insect-active Yen-TC [15]. Rhs proteins are composed of a conserved N-terminal region and a divergent C-terminal “tip” region of 100–200 amino acids [16] that can encode the toxin effector component [17,18,19]. The Yen-TC causes loss of gut epithelial integrity, allowing the bacterium to gain entry to the insect hemocoelic cavity [13,20].
Once ingested, Y. entomophaga is likely to be confronted by a wide range of proteolytic gut enzymes, the endogenous microbial community, and physiological variables such as pH, ionic strength, and redox potential of the gut [21]. The epithelial and hemocoelic hemocytes of the insect gut produce large amounts of anti-microbial compounds and reactive oxygen species (ROS), which incapacitate invading pathogens [21,22]. Iron is a key element required by microbes and higher organisms. It is highly insoluble at a neutral pH, making the near neutral environment of the insect hemocoelic fluid [23] unsuitable for microorganisms [24,25]. In iron-limiting conditions, many pathogens produce siderophores, which are used to capture and sequester iron from the environment and eukaryotic intracellular protein iron storage molecules such as ferritin and transferrin [24].
The 4-day intra-hemocoelically-injected median lethal dose of either Y. entomophaga or its Yen-TC deletion derivative Y. entomophaga ΔTC towards G. mellonella is approximately three cells [13]. This low dose is similar to the number of Photorhabdus cells required to cause lethality. Once released into the hemocoelic cavity, the nematode-vectored Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus species produce a range of toxins active in the hemoceol and antimicrobial compounds [26,27]. These include several TC orthologs [28], called the Photorhabdus insect-related binary toxins (PirAB), which are active when injected into the hemocoelic cavity of G. mellonella [29,30], and the apoptotic P. luminescens-derived Mcf (makes caterpillars floppy) protein [31,32]. In addition to these insect-active toxins, P. luminescens and Xenorhabdus nematophila secrete hydroxystilbene and benzylideneacetone, respectively, which limit the growth of competing microorganisms and inhibit phenol oxidase produced by phagocytic hemocytes of the insect [27,33,34].
The low number of Y. entomophaga cells required to cause an effect post-hemocoelic injection leads us to suggest that, similar to Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus species, Y. entomophaga encodes and produces a wide range of factors that suppress the host immune system, and possibly limit the growth of the endemic microbial community [13]. To help elucidate the possible underlying mechanisms, a draft Y. entomophaga genome was assembled, allowing the in silico-based identification of possible virulence determinants.

2. Results

2.1. Yersinia entomophaga Genome Summary

The draft Yersinia entomophaga genome sequence comprises one scaffold consisting of six contigs joined by PCR. The contig boundaries are indicated in Figure 1. Three gaps remain at approximately 1,413,485, 1,811,615, and 2,801,405 (gb|CP010029), and these DNA regions coincide with phage elements.
The Y. entomophaga draft genome sequence comprises 4,275,531 bp, with a G+C content of 48.58%, with seven 16S rRNA ribosomal-associated regions. Analysis of the functional categories and genome-wide distribution of all unique genes with assigned clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) revealed a total of 4225 proteins. In total, 325 hypothetical proteins and 703 proteins not represented in the COG database, comprising 24.2% of the Y. entomophaga genome, were identified (Table 1).
In silico analysis revealed 93.8% DNA sequence identity between the Y. entomophaga genome and the draft genome sequence of Y. nurmii type strain APN3a-cT(gb|CIP110231). No region with significant DNA identity to the Y. entomophaga PAIYe96 Yen-TC virulence-associated region was identified in the Y. nurmii APN3a-cT genome sequence. Alignment of the Y. entomophaga ORFeome with the Yersinia species Y. ruckeri 29473 and Y. enterocolitica 8081 identified several genomic regions greater than 10 kb in size that were either unique or had an atypical G+C content compared with the rest of the Y. entomophaga genome sequence (Figure 1). Two regions of DNA, designated Region 1 and Region 2, were identified in the genome (Figure 2, Table S1). These regions encode a range of putative virulence factors and gene clusters involved in cell adhesin and in iron acquisition, which are outlined in detail below.

2.2. Putative Virulence Clusters

Documented and putative Y. entomophaga-encoded toxins are listed in Table 2.

2.3. Rhs and Type VI-Associated Regions

Including the YenC1 and YenC2 subcomponents of the Yen-TC (Rhs-associated Region 1), the Y. entomophaga genome harbors five gene clusters encoding a Rhs element (Figure 3). Encoded within Rhs-associated Region 2 is a third YenC ortholog (PL78_18780; Figure 3), which shows high N-terminal amino acid similarity to each of the Yen-TC subcomponents (YenC1 and YenC2), and to TccC3 from Vibrio parahemolyticus, where the putative C-terminus effector is similar (Table S2). Located 5′ of PL78_18780 is PL78_18790, an ortholog of the Escherichia coli inhibitor of vertebrate lysozyme protein (Ivy) [35], a lysozyme that targets the peptidoglycan moiety of bacterial cell walls [36]. A region of DNA flanked by IS elements was identified 3′ of the Rhs element (PL78_18780). The DNA internal to these IS elements encodes several hypothetical proteins and a Y. entomophaga ortholog (PL78_18760) of the Yersinia pekkanenii and P. luminescens LopT type III secretion system (T3SS) effector proteins (Figure 3; Table S2).
Rhs-associated Region 3 contains a large gene cluster comprising loci with similarity to several type VI secretion system (T6SS) inner membrane protein (Imp) components, IcmF (PL78_00970), and a VgR locus (PL78_00980) (Table S2; Figure 3). A subset of these genes within Rhs-associated Region 3 share a similar gene order to the P. luminescens pmt genomic island, which encodes an E. coli macrophage toxin-like (mt-like) protein [37]. Though no mt-like protein was identified in the Y. entomophaga genome, several similarly oriented loci, some with partial homology to the Rhs core domain were identified 3ʹ of the Rhs element (PL78_00990) (Table S2). The N terminus of PL78_01005 showed partial identity to the Rhs core domain region, while its C terminus shares identity with the nuclease domain of the HNH/EndoVII superfamily (Table S2). Another locus (PL78_00995) showed amino acid similarity to the Spt4 eukaryotic transcription elongation factor domain (Figure 3; Table S2). BlastX analysis identified the regions in between loci (PL78_00995-PL78_01045) located 3′ of the Rhs element (PL78_00990) had non-functional translated similarity to the RhsA core region (Figure 3). Of interest, an 18,893-bp region (176,282–192,175 bp, Y. entomophaga genome sequence gb|CP010029), located within Rhs-associated Region 3, shares approximately 70%–72% DNA identity with the S. fonticola strain DSM 4576 genome sequence (gb|CP011254.1).
Rhs-associated Region 4 encodes an ortholog (PL78_12135) of the Yersinia pseudotuberculosis RhsA wapA_1 protein (Table S2). Downstream of this ortholog is PL78_12130, which shares amino acid similarity with the T3SS effector protein from Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum NCPPB 4379 [38]. Similar to Rhs-associated Region 3, Rhs-associated Region 4 encodes an ortholog of the IcmF-T6SS-associated protein (PL78_12105) (Figure 3; Table S2).
Rhs-associated Region 5 encodes the largest Rhs element (PL78_15070), consisting of 1,584 amino acids with high similarity to type IV secretion system protein RhsA from Pseudomonas fluorescens (Table S2). Several loci with protein orthologs in Chromobacterium violaceum and P. luminescens were identified downstream of PL78_15070 (Table S2). A NusG-type regulator with amino acid similarity to the Serratia entomophila amb2 locus [39] was identified upstream of Rhs PL78_15070 (Table S2). However, in silico analysis did not identify a region corresponding to the operon polarity suppressor (5′-GGCGGTAGNNT-3′), to which the NusG regulator binds, within 15 kb of Y. entomophaga PL78_15075. Of note, the G+C content of Rhs Region 5 (G+C, 41.1%) was significantly divergent to that of the Y. entomophaga genome as a whole (G+C, 48.6%) (Figure 1), and had no significant nucleotide identity to DNA sequences deposited in the databases.

2.4. Type II and III Secretion Systems

T3SS complexes enable bacteria to dock directly with host cells and actively deliver toxin effectors into the target cell [40,41]. The Y. entomophaga genome encodes two T3SSs, designated T3SSYE1 and T3SSYE2 (Table S3, Figure 4A). The gene components of T3SSYE1 have significant amino acid similarity to the components of the S. fonticola strain DSM 4576 T3SS (Table S3), while the T3SSYE2 proteins showed the greatest similarity to T3SS orthologs of Y. ruckeri (Table S3). Based on amino acid similarity and relative ORF positions in comparison with other published T3SSs, T3SSYE1 and T3SSYE2 resemble the Inv-Mxi-Spa gene order of Salmonella typhimurium SPI-1 [42] and the gene order of the Y. enterocolitica 8081 and A127/90 Yersinia secretion apparatus (Ysa) present in biotype IB strains of Y. enterocolitica [42], respectively. PL78_18075, encoding an intestinal cellular attachment intimin protein [43], was located upstream of T3SSYE1 and in the same orientation. Similar to the Y. enterocolitica Ysa T3SS [42,44], the orientation of the ORFs encoding T3SSYE2 are divergent. The AraC-type regulator gene and the genes encoding InvG (PL78_14540) and the acyl carrier (PL78_14620) are similarly oriented, while the genes upstream of AraC (PL78_14535), in the region from prgH (PL78_14530) to orgB (PL78_14505), are oriented in the opposing direction (Figure 4A). Both T3SSYE1 and T3SSYE2 encode the invasin InvA, which, in other T3SSs, promotes transit of the pathogen across the host cell [41,43]. In silico analysis did not identify any loci with amino acid similarity to documented toxin orthologs within or in close proximity of either T3SSYE1 or T3SSYE2 (Figure 4A).
The type II secretion system (T2SS) is an alternate delivery system enabling the transport of folded macromolecules such as toxins. T2SS’s comprise a composite of proteins that span both the inner and outer bacterial cell membranes [45,46]. We identified a single T2SS gene cluster in Y. entomophaga, which comprised 11 loci (PL78_08930–PL78_08980) with similarity to the T2SS of several related species, including Y. ruckeri (Figure 4B; Table S3). We noted that the DNA encoding the T2SS is of an atypically low G+C content (35%).

2.5. Accessory Virulence Determinants

In silico analysis of the Y. entomophaga sequence identified the presence of several other virulence determinants with orthologs in both insect and mammalian pathogens. The Y. entomophaga loci PL78_09590 and PL78_09595 share high amino acid similarity with the P. luminescens PirA and PirB binary toxins [29], respectively (Figure 2B; Table S1).
The largest Y. entomophaga locus, PL78_16910, encodes a 4660-amino acid repeats-in-toxin (RTX) protein (Figure 5). Similar to other rtx gene clusters, which are relatively conserved at the amino acid level and in regards to gene order [47], loci involved in RTX transport were located both 5′ and 3′ of PL78_16910 (Figure 5; Table S4).
The Y. entomophaga loci PL78_18440 and PL78_18445 are orthologs of CdtA and CdtB, respectively, which are subcomponents of the cytolethal distending toxin (Cdt) (Table S4). Typically, Cdts are encoded by three co-located genes, cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC, the CdtB component of which is the active toxin [46,47]. Interestingly, no CdtC ortholog was identified in Y. entomophaga. Although all mammalian Cdt orthologs contain an N-terminal signal peptide [48,49], only the Y. entomophaga CdtB contains a N-terminal signal peptide.
The C-terminal region of PL78_16145 showed partial amino acid similarity to the ADP ribosyltransferase domain of the VIP2 superfamily (Table S4) derived from the Bacillus cereus vegetative insecticidal protein VIP2 [50,51]. The binary VIP toxin is typically composed of two toxins, VIP1 and VIP2, and the VIP1 multimer enables the delivery of the VIP2 ADP-ribosylase to the target cell cytoplasm [52]. No VIP1 ortholog was identified in the Y. entomophaga genome.
PL78_08395 was also identified as a putative toxin. It showed amino acid identity to an adenylate cyclase domain, with orthologs in several different bacterial genera (Figure 5, Table S4). This included a distant ortholog with less than 35% amino acid identity over 197 amino acid residues to the domain region of Bacillus anthracis adenylate cyclase [53]; in this instance, the N- and C-terminal regions of the non-domain regions were dissimilar (Table S4). We also note that, unlike B. anthracis, no corresponding protective antigen transport module [53] was identified in the Y. entomophaga genome.

2.6. Iron Acquisition

Several iron-associated systems, including siderophores, heme-binding proteins, and their cognate receptors and regulators, were identified in the Y. entomophaga genome. Although heme- and iron-associated regions are distributed throughout the Y. entomophaga genome, these gene clusters are more prevalent in the vicinity of putative virulence components (Figure 2). We specifically noted loci involved in iron siderophore synthesis and transport within Region 1, which were located between the Yen-TC-encoding gene cluster and the later-outlined proteolytic serralysins (Figure 2A). Located within this region as well are the loci PL78_03845 and PL78_03850 (Figure 2A), which are orthologs of the Y. ruckeri population-dependent quorum sensing LuxR transcriptional regulator and the N-acyl homoserine lactone synthase, respectively (Table S1). We also identified genes involved in iron transport and enterobactin synthesis within Region 2, along with the cognate ferrichrysobactin receptor (PL78_09745). These genes were in proximity to pirAB (Figure 2B; Table 1). A single ferric uptake regulator (Fur) (PL78_01300), which represses specific genes in the presence of iron [24], was also identified in a non-descript region of the genome.

2.7. Proteolytic Enzymes

The production of pathogen-derived proteases, chitinases, esterases, and lipases can degrade microbial and host proteins and lyse host cells, liberating iron and other compounds. A Y. entomophaga operon containing three loci (PL78_03960, PL78_03965, PL78_03970), each encoding a serralysin metalloprotease with at least 68% amino acid sequence similarity to each other, was identified within Region 1 (Figure 2; Table S1). Amino acid alignment of the Y. entomophaga serralysin gene cluster with those from closely related species identified slight amino acid divergence across the entire amino acid sequence, although each contained the Zn-endopeptidase metal-binding motif (HexxHxxGxxH). The Y. entomophaga ORF PL78_03965 is truncated by 17 N-terminal amino acid residues (Figure 6). An alkaline protease inhibitor (PL78_03980) was located 3′ of the Y. entomophaga serralysin gene cluster (Figure 2A), while hemolysin transporter HlyD (PL78_03990) was located downstream of PL78_03980. In addition to degradative enzymes (Table S4), the Y. entomophaga genome encodes two hemolysin genes (PL78_04365, PL78_11060) with a high level of amino acid similarity to hemolysins from Y. ruckeri (Table S4). A thermolabile hemolysin (PL78_09600) with identity to a lipase/hydrolase domain, and PL78_18430, which also has amino acid identity to the esterase/lipase domain, were located 3′ of the pirAB orthologs and 5′ of CdtA, respectively (Figure 2B; Figure 5).
Aside from the previously documented Yen-TC Chi1 and Chi2 proteins [14,17], a third predicted chitinase, PL78_11910, was also identified (Figure 1; Table S4). Two Y. entomophaga chitin-binding loci (PL78_05310, PL78_08295) with orthologs in Y. intermedia and Y. ruckeri, respectively, were also identified. The first, PL78_05310, is positioned upstream of PL78_05315 and PL78_05320, the respective orthologs of which (srfA and srfB) are found in the S. typhimurium pathogenicity island SPI-2. Transcription of srfA and srfB is upregulated in epithelial and macrophage cells [54]. The loci PL78_05315 and PL78_05320 are positioned 5′ of an undefined virulence-associated locus (PL78_10835) (Figure 5; Table S4). The second chitin-binding locus, PL78_08295, was located downstream of components of a fimbrial pilus cluster comprising three loci PL78_08270, PL78_08275, and PL78_08280, (Figure 5; Table S4).

2.8. Cell Adhesins

A prerequisite of virulence is a close association between the pathogen and the host cell. Some cell wall components, such as fimbriae or pili, form appendages that can aid in adherence to the host cell and enhance virulence. In silico analysis of the Y. entomophaga genome identified several fimbrial gene clusters and sub-component fimbrial gene clusters (Tables S1, S4 and S5). The most interesting of these comprised four fimbrial orthologs (PL78_17285-PL78_17300) that, along with chaperones and regulators, are predicted to be components of a putative fimbrial island cluster spanning 16,470 bp, flanked by two tRNA Asn 138-bp repeats (Figure 7, Table S5). Although the G+C composition (49.2%) of this region was similar to that of Y. entomophaga as a whole, the region shared the highest level of DNA identity (~72%) with Y. intermedia strain Y228 (gb|CP009801.1). This region was designated fimbrial-associated island FAIYE96. Similar to iron clusters, many of these fimbrial gene clusters are co-located with virulence-associated genes (Figure 2), with several fimbrial ushers and chaperones positioned upstream of the pirAB genes (Figure 2B; Table S1).
Components of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) gene cluster, PL78_00685-PL78_00780 (Figure 7), in the Y. entomophaga genome were most similar in amino acid identity and gene order to the Y. ruckeri LPS clusters (Table S5). Of note, the cellulose-encoding gene cluster, also with high amino acid identity to Y. ruckeri, was located within 15-kb of Rhs-associated Region 4, co-located with a large number of peptide transport proteins (Figure 1 and Figure 7; Table S2).

2.9. Host Defense and Microbial Competition Systems

The Y. entomophaga genome encodes several loci that are likely to assist in the survival of the bacterium in the insect host. The genome encodes a colicin V protein (PL78_16525), two non-ribosomal peptide synthases (PL78_04165 and PL78_15615) that are likely to direct the production of microbial- and or host-active metabolites (Table S6). A second Ivy locus (PL78_15610) is located 5′ of PL78_15615. A number of ROS defense loci were also identified (Table S6), including superoxide dismutases (Sod) loci: an iron binding SodB (PL78_05910), a manganese-binding SodA (PL78_12235), and a copper/zinc binding Sod (PL78_14360). Each of these proteins has the capacity to catalyze the conversion of superoxide radicals to molecular oxygen.

3. Discussion

Bioinformatic analysis of the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence identified a wide range of toxin-encoding regions, as well as gene clusters involved in iron capture and transport. Although the assessed ORFeome identity indicates that Y. entomophaga is more closely related to Y. ruckeri and Y. enterocolitica (Tables S1–S6), the main virulence determinants of these species, such as the Afp18 [55] and YadA or Yop effector orthologs [56,57], were not identified in the Y. entomophaga draft genome sequence. With respect to known entomopathogenic toxins, in silico analysis of the Y. entomophaga genome did not identify orthologs of the Pseudomonas entomophila pore-forming toxin monolysin [58], the P. luminescens Mcf [31], or Afp/PVC proteins [59], the X. nematophila XaxA and XaxB binary toxins [60], or the Xenorhabdus Txp40 toxin [61]. Nor were any Bacillus thuringiensis toxin [50] orthologs identified. In contrast to P. luminescens and Xenorhabdus species, the Y. entomophaga genome encodes a single TC cluster, which may reflect the broad host range of the Yen-TC [14].
Of note, the Y. entomophaga genome encodes orthologs of the Photorhabdus hemocoelically-active PirAB binary toxin [30], based on the high amino acid sequence similarity, the Y. entomophaga PirAB orthologues are also likely to be hemocoelically active. An RTX-family ortholog was also identified in Y. entomophaga, members of which typically disrupt the host cell membrane, enhancing the capacity of the pathogen to colonize the host [47]. Based on the conserved function of RTX proteins, we predict a similar function for the Y. entomophaga RTX protein.

3.1. Multi-Component Toxin Delivery Systems

The Y. entomophaga genome encodes several multi-component toxin delivery systems. Unlike P. luminescens, which contains a single T3SS (29), Y. entomophaga encodes two T3SSs. Y. entomophaga T3SSYE1 has a gene order similar to that of S. typhimurium T3SS SPI1, which is required for entry into intestinal epithelial cells. Once internalized, the effectors from the second S. typhimurium T3SS, SPI2, are released. This leads to the formation of a specialized Salmonella-containing vacuole where the bacterium can reside and replicate [62]. We note that the Y. entomophaga T3SSYE1 is associated with an intimin protein, which in other systems facilitates the attachment of the pathogen to the intestinal epithelial cells [43]. In this respect, we note that the closest Y. entomophaga initimin BlastP orthologs were in non-Yersinia species, including insect-associated bacteria such as Xenorhabdus bovienii and Sodalis praecaptivus (Table S3). The Y. enterocolitica Ysa system (T3SS), which has a gene order resembling that of T3SSYE2, is implicated in the initial colonization of the animal intestinal ileum [63] and has been found essential for the intracellular replication of Y. enterocolitica in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells, with the authors suggesting that Y. enterocolitica has an insect host [44]. In instances where T3SSs have been identified in entomopathogenic bacteria, including P. luminescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, they are active against hemocytes [64]. In this context, we note that Y. entomophaga has previously been observed within insect hemocytes [13].
In addition to the T3SSs, five gene clusters containing Rhs elements were identified, which, based on in silico analysis, are likely to play a significant role in virulence. The most prominent of these is Rhs-associated Region 3, which encodes components of a T6SS and several loci PL78_00995, PL78_01005, and PL78_01040 with similarity to different DNA-associating proteins, suggesting that these proteins are likely to interact with host cell DNA and a requirement for their delivery to a target cell. Although there are several prokaryotic orthologs in the current databases (Table S2), a protein with a Spt4 domain has not been previously documented in prokaryotic systems [65]. We surmise that, if internalized, PL78_00995 could affect eukaryotic cell viability through transcriptional activation. Of interest was the presence of DNA between each loci located 3′ of PL78_00990 that had translated similarity to the Rhs core domain region; a phenomenon that may suggest to the possible gene acquisition by PL78_00990. Rhs-associated Region 4 also encodes component orthologs of T6SS and a putative T3SS effector proteins. The region may therefore represent a Y. entomophaga variant of a T6SS (Figure 3). The two remaining Rhs-associated regions (2 and 5) encode Rhs elements as well as a LopT toxin ortholog (66) and a known regulator of virulence (Amb2) [39], respectively. Based on the presence of these proteins in other documented systems, these Rhs-associated regions are also likely to have a role in virulence in Y. entomophaga.
In silico analysis showed that many of the putative Y. entomophaga toxins, such as CdtB (PL78_18445), VIP2 (PL78_16145), Rhs (PL78_18780), LopT (PL78_18760), and the adenylate cyclase toxin (PL78_08395), are not accompanied by their associated transport module. It is plausible that some of these putative toxin effectors are co-opted by existing transport modules, such as the T3SSs or T6SS’s, enabling their delivery. The P. luminescens LopT effector, which in Spodoptera littoralis and Locusta migratoria is activated at sites of cellular defense to prevent phagocytosis, complements the Y. pseudotuberculosis T3SS, allowing its delivery into mammalian cells [66]. The Rhs TC-C-like component (PL78_18780) may also complement the YenC1 or YenC2 subcomponents. Alternatively, these putative Y. entomophaga toxins may be released directly into the eukaryotic cell cytosol by a yet to be determined mechanism. This could include the Y. entomophaga T2SS, whose role in other systems has yet to be fully elucidated, but has been implicated in the secretion of cell surface-located toxins and adhesins [45,67].

3.2. Co-Location of Cell Adhesins or Lytic Enzymes with Virulence Determinants

In silico analysis identified several cellular attachment systems, including pili, LPS, fimbrial clusters, and components thereof, which are likely to form a vestigial adhesin appendage. Although we have previously noted polar fimbriae on bacterial aggregates grown at 37 °C [13], the function of these systems in regards to virulence has yet to be elucidated. In silico analysis revealed that many of the Y. entomophaga fimbrial genes and degradative enzymes, including chitinases, hemolysins, lipases, and proteases, are co-located with iron-associated siderophores and virulence-encoding gene clusters specifically in Regions 1 and 2 (Figure 2 and Figure 5). It has previously been noted that chitinases not only hydrolyze chitin, but also have binding affinity for mammalian and invertebrate LacdiNAc and LacNAc glycans, and are proposed to enhance binding of the pathogen to the host cell surface [68]. In addition to fimbriae, the proximity of some of these proteolytic enzymes to toxin clusters, specifically pirAB and cdtAB, with no detected transport system may be indicative of a secondary role, such as aiding the binding of the pathogen or toxin to a host cell.
Host cell lysis by proteolytic enzymes or toxins results in the release of iron. We noted that three serralysin metalloprotease loci were co-located with a Y. entomophaga gene cluster involved in iron siderophore biosynthesis and transport in Region 2 (Figure 2B). Intra-hemocoelic injection of the P. luminescens serralysin (PrtS) causes melaninization of G. mellonella and D. melanogaster larvae [69]. A serralysin (Ser) from Serratia marcescens induces hemolymph bleeding in the silkworm Bombyx mori, possibly through the degradation of host-derived factors required for coagulation [70]. Massaoud et al. [71] determined that serralysins from different Xenorhabdus species with a high degree of amino acid similarity differ in their relative proteolytic efficiency in the presence of different chelation factors. This data would account for the presence of three co-located Y. entomophaga serralysin loci, each of which may be tailored to a specific host system. Based in the aforementioned scenarios the co-location of putative toxin, adhesion or lytic enzymes within Region 1 and Region 2 may reflect a subtle interplay between the proteins throughout the virulence process.
Several host defense systems identified in the current study, including Ivy, ROS defense systems, siderophores, and antimicrobial factors, have been documented in other systems [26,27]. Although the role of these components, along with a number of non-ribosomal peptide synthases, free radical sequestering systems, and LPS and cellulose gene clusters, has yet to be elucidated, orthologs in other systems [26,27,72] indicate that they are likely to play a significant role in survival of the bacterium post-ingestion or following entry into the insect hemocoelic cavity and/or the eukaryotic cell.
In recent years, it has become apparent that many plant- and insect-active toxins have distant mammalian orthologs, with both plant and invertebrate pathogens proposed as the progenitors of mammalian pathogens [73,74,75,76,77]. Bioinformatic analysis of the Y. entomophaga genome did not identify any orthologs of known Y. pestis or Y. pseudotuberculosis virulence determinants. Those orthologs of known mammalian toxins that were identified, including hemolysin and adenylate cyclase toxin, had either low amino acid similarity or represented a sub-component of a composite toxin cluster. In this context, the ability of a toxin to traverse the mammalian mucosal intestinal lining or cross the chitinous insect intestinal tract relies on different delivery vehicles, which, when docked, enable the transfer of conserved effector toxin molecules that typically act to cause a similar subcellular effect [78,79]. In this respect, we note that specific effector molecules, such as the cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (Cnf1) domain of the Yen-TC YenC1 C-terminus, thought to be transported by the YenA and YenB components [17], are vectored by alternate transport modules, such as the Photorhadus virulence cassette [80]. However, E. coli-derived Cnf harbors its own amino terminal receptor-targeting domain [81].
In silico analysis of the Y. entomophaga draft genome sequence confirmed that the bacterium encodes a diverse range of putative effector toxins and proteolytic enzymes, which along with complex export machinery and iron-sequestering factors, reflects a finely tuned pathogen capable of incapacitating a wide range of insect species. The wide variety of toxins produced by P. luminescens and Xenorhabdus species, and encoded by Y. entomophaga, is likely to reflect the broad and non-discriminant nature of their associated nematode [26,82] and, in the case of Y. entomophaga, the broad host range of the Yen-TC. For these bacteria, the associated nematode or the Yen-TC mediate the entry of the pathogen into the hemocoelic cavity, from where infection can occur. The Y. entomophaga genome also encodes a large number of hypothetical proteins, the functions of which have yet to be defined. To gain greater insight into the full functional potential of the genome, a range of in vitro and in vivo transcriptomic and proteomic studies will need to be undertaken.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Genomic DNA Isolation

Genomic DNA was prepared using a Bioline Isolate II Genomic DNA kit (BIO-52066), mini-spin column isolation. The yield and purity of the DNA was determined for 5-μL samples by electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel and by spectrophotometry on a NanoDrop 1000 apparatus (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.2. Genome Sequencing

Genome sequencing was undertaken at the University of Liverpool Centre for Genomic Research, Liverpool, United Kingdom. Eight kilobase paired-end libraries were generated using the Roche “Paired End Rapid Library Preparation Method Manual, 20 kb and 8 kb Span, April 2012” according to manufacturers instructions. Each library was quantified using Qubit and the size distribution assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. The resultant libraries were further quantified by qPCR using a Roche LightCycler 480 and Kapa 454 library quantification kit. Medium volume emPCRs were performed for each library with 0.6 copies per bead of input material and recovery levels of beads confirmed using a Beckman Coulter Counter. Beads from emPCR reactions for each library were pooled and sequencing performed on half a picotiter plate according to manufacturers instructions using xlr70 (Titanium) chemistry. The genome sequencing gaps were closed in-house using PCR-based amplicon sequencing. PCR primer sets were manually designed or designed using Primer3 version 0.4.0 (Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA) [83].

4.3. Genome Assembly

For assembly, a combination of illumina single-end and Roche 454 pair-end data was used. Illumina data was trimmed for quality using SolexaQA version 2 software (Massey University, New Zealand, 2010), using DynamicTrim [84], with parameter p = 0.05, then normalized down to 30× coverage using the khmer digital normalization package [85], and the combined data was assembled using Newbler GS De Novo Assembler version 2.7 [86], run in homozygous mode, with overlap identity of 95%, an identity score of 1, and a difference score of −3. All contigs shorter than 1 kb were discarded as low coverage misassemblies after comparing them to the rest of the resulting assembly. This resulted in 6 paired-end contigs (Figure 1) as a single scaffold-containing 11 gaps. For gap closing, a collection of primers designed around the estimated gap positions and lengths was produced, and sequences were generated using Sanger sequencing. The scaffolded assembly, as well as Sanger reads, were imported into Geneious 7 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand, 2013) [87], and assembled using the Medium Sensitivity/Fast parameters. The draft Y. entomophaga MH96 genome sequence is deposited in Genbank, as accession number: gb|CP010029; BioProject: PRJNA267025 and BioSample: SAMN03177402.

4.4. Genome Annotation

The genome was automatically annotated using the NCBI pipeline [88]. The COG categories were found using the standalone COG software [89]. Tables S1–S6 were manually curated.

4.5. Genome Atlas and Genome–Genome DNA Identity Comparison

The assembled draft genome was annotated using an updated version of the GAMOLA software suite [90] and results then processed for graphical presentation. The circle was created using GeneWiz browser 0.91 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/gwBrowser/) [91] and in-house developed software (version 2.3, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2015). Circles 6–8, Blast similarities, were created using the NCBI non-redundant amino-acid Blast database, a custom Y. enterocolitica 8081, and a custom Y. ruckeri ATCC 29473 Blast database. Deduced amino acid sequences of the Y. entomophaga ORFeome were compared against the respective database using gapped BlastP (Version 2.2.24, NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2010) [92]. The draft Y. entomophaga MH96 genome sequence was compared by Latz (Version 1.02.00, Miller Lab, Penn state University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2010) [93] against the Y. nurmii type strain APN3a-c whole genome shotgun sequencing project (NZ_CPYD00000000).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/8/5/143/s1, Table S1: Yersinia entomophaga unique Regions 1 and 2, Table S2: Yersinia entomophaga Rhs-associated regions 2–5, Table S3: Yersinia entomophaga Type 2 and 3-associated regions, Table S4: Yersinia entomophaga accessory virulence determinants: Repeats in Toxin cluster, CdtAB, VIP2, adenylate cyclase, chitinase, and chitin binding protein-associated regions and putative hemolysins, Table S5: Yersinia entomophaga cell adhesins, fimbriae, Lipopolysaccharide, and cellulose encoding clusters, Table S6: Yersinia entomophaga countermeasures: ColicinV, Sod, and non-ribosomal peptide synthetase.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand (grant number C10X1310).

Author Contributions

Roger M. Moraga assembled the genome sequence, Aurelie Laugraud undertook genome annotation, Amy Beattie, Lincoln A. Harper and Joanne Calder closed sequencing gaps. Eric Altermann compiled genome atlas and Figure 1. Mark R. H. Hurst took the lead on writing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Woese, C.R.; Fox, G.E. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 74, 5088–5090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Perry, R.D.; Fetherston, J.D. Yersinia pestis—Etiologic agent of plague. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1997, 10, 35–66. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Ewing, W.H.A.; Ross, A.J.; Brenner, D.J.; Fanning, G.R. Yersinia ruckeri sp. nov., the redmouth (RM) bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1978, 28, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sulakvelidze, A. Yersiniae other than Y. enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis, and Y. pestis: The ignored species. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2, 497–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reuter, S.; Connor, T.; Barquist, L.; Walker, D.; Feltwell, T.; Harris, S.; Fookes, M.; Hall, M.; Petty, N.; Fuchs, T.; et al. Parallel independent evolution of pathogenicity within the genus Yersinia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6768–6773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Murros-Kontiainen, A.; Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Korkeala, H.; Johansson, P.; Rahkila, R.; Björkroth, J. Yersinia nurmii sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 61, 2368–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Souza, R.A.; Imori, P.F.; Falcão, J.P. Multilocus sequence analysis and 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveal that Yersinia frederiksenii genospecies 2 is Yersinia massiliensis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 3124–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. McNally, A.; Thomson, N.R.; Reuter, S.; Wren, B.W. Add, stir and reduce: Yersinia spp. as model bacteria for pathogen evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fernández, L.; Méndez, J.; Guijarro, J.A. Molecular virulence mechanisms of the fish pathogen Yersinia ruckeri. Vet. Microbiol. 2007, 125, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bottone, E.J.; Bercovier, H.; Mollaret, H.H. Genus. XLI. Yersinia. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; Garrity, G.M., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA; 2005; Volume 2, pp. 838–848. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hurst, M.R.H.; Becher, S.A.; Young, S.D.; Nelson, T.L.; Glare, T.R. Yersinia entomophaga sp. nov. isolated from the New Zealand grass grub Costelytra zealandica. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 61, 844–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hurst, M.R.; van Koten, C.; Jackson, T.A. Pathology of Yersinia entomophaga MH96 towards Costelytra zealandica (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae) larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 115, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hurst, M.R.H.; Beattie, A.; Jones, S.; Hsu, P.-C.; Calder, J.; van Koten, C. Galleria mellonella mortality as a result of Yersinia entomophaga infection is temperature-dependent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 6404–6414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hurst, M.R.H.; Jones, S.A.; Tan, B.; Harper, L.A.; Glare, T.R. The main virulence determinant of Yersinia entomophaga MH96 is a broad-host-range toxin complex active against insects. J. Bact. 2011, 193, 1966–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Landsberg, M.J.; Jones, S.A.; Rothnagel, R.; Busby, J.N.; Marshall, S.D.G.; Simpson, R.M.; Lott, J.S.; Hankamer, B.; Hurst, M.R.H. 3D structure of the Yersinia entomophaga toxin complex and implications for insecticidal activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 108, 20544–20549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hill, C.W.; Sandt, C.H.; Vlazny, D.A. Rhs elements of Escherichia coli: A family of genetic composites each encoding a large mosaic protein. Mol. Microbiol. 1994, 12, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Busby, J.N.; Landsberg, M.J.; Simpson, R.; Jones, S.A.; Hankamer, B.; Hurst, M.R.; Lott, J.S. Structural analysis of chi1 chitinase from Yen-Tc: The multisubunit insecticidal ABC toxin complex of yersinia entomophaga. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 3, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Koskiniemi, S.; Lamoureux, J.G.; Nikolakakis, K.C.; de Roodenbeke, C.T.; Kaplan, M.D.; Low, D.A.; Hayes, C.S. Rhs proteins from diverse bacteria mediate intercellular competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7032–7037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Koskiniemi, S.; Garza-Sánchez, F.; Sandegren, L.; Webb, J.S.; Braaten, B.A.; Poole, S.J.; Andersson, D.I.; Hayes, C.S.; Low, D.A. Selection of orphan Rhs toxin expression in evolved Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Marshall, S.D.G.; Hares, M.C.; Jones, S.A.; Harper, L.A.; James, V.R.; Harland, D.P.; Jackson, T.A.; Hurst, M.R.H. Histolopathological effects of the Yen-Tc toxin complex from Yersina entomophaga MH96 (Enterobacteriaceae) on the midgut of Costelytra zealandica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larvae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 4835–4847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Engel, P.; Moran, N.A. The gut microbiota of insects-diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 699–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vallet-Gely, I.; Lemaitre, B.; Boccard, F. Bacterial strategies to overcome insect defences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chapman, R.F. The Insects: Structure and Function, 5th ed.; Simpson, S.J., Douglas, A.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ratledge, C.; Dover, L.G. Iron metabolism in pathogenic bacteria. Rev. Microbiol. 2000, 54, 881–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Skaar, E.P. The battle for iron between bacterial pathogens and their vertebrate hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Waterfield, N.R.; Ciche, T.; Clarke, D. Photorhabdus and a host of hosts. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 557–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nielsen-LeRoux, C.; Gaudriault, S.; Ramarao, N.; Lereclus, D.; Givaudan, A. How the insect pathogen bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis and Xenorhabdus/Photorhabdus occupy their hosts. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bowen, D.; Rocheleau, T.A.; Blackburn, M.; Andreev, O.; Golubeva, E.; Bhartia, R.; ffrench-Constant, R.H. Insecticidal toxins from the bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Science 1998, 280, 2129–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Duchaud, E.; Rusniok, C.; Frangeul, L.; Buchrieser, C.; Givaudan, A.; Taourit, S.; Bocs, S.; Boursaux-Eude, C.; Chandler, M.; Charles, J.-F.; et al. The genome sequence of the entomopathogenic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 1307–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Waterfield, N.; Kamita, S.G.; Hammock, B.D.; Ffrench-Constant, R. The Photorhabdus Pir toxins are similar to a developmentally regulated insect protein but show no juvenile hormone esterase activity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 245, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Daborn, P.J.; Waterfield, N.R.; Silva, C.P.; Au, C.P.; Sharma, S.; ffrench-Constant, R.H. A single Photorhabdus gene, makes caterpillars floppy (mcf), allows Escherichia coli to persist within and kill insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 88, 10742–10747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dowling, A.J.; Daborn, P.J.; Waterfield, N.R.; Wang, P.; Streuli, C.H.; ffrench-Constant, R.H. The insecticidal toxin Makes caterpillars floppy (Mcf) promotes apoptosis in mammalian cells. Cell Microbiol. 2004, 6, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Joyce, S.A.; Brachmann, A.O.; Glazer, I.; Lango, L.; Schwär, G.; Clarke, D.J.; Bode, H.B. Bacterial biosynthesis of a multipotent stilbene. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008, 47, 1942–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Song, C.J.; Seo, S.; Shrestha, S.; Kim, Y. Bacterial metabolites of an entomopathogenic bacterium, Xenorhabdus nematophila, inhibit a catalytic activity of phenoloxidase of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 21, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Abergel, C.; Monchois, V.; Byrne, D.; Chenivesse, S.; Lembo, F.; Lazzaroni, J.C.; Claverie, J.M. Structure and evolution of the Ivy protein family, unexpected lysozyme inhibitors in Gram-negative bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6394–6399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Deckers, D.; Masschalck, B.; Aertsen, A.; Callewaert, L.; van Tiggelen, C.G.; Atanassova, M.; Michiels, C.W. Periplasmic lysozyme inhibitor contributes to lysozyme resistance in Escherichia coli. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61, 1229–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Waterfield, N.R.; Daborn, P.J.; ffrench-Constant, R.H. Genomic islands in Photorhabdus. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wasukira, A.; Tayebwa, J.; Thwaites, R.; Paszkiewicz, K.; Aritua, V.; Kubiriba, J.; Smith, J.; Grant, M.; Studholme, D.J. Genome-wide sequencing reveals two major sub-lineages in the genetically monomorphic pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. Musacearum. Genes. 2012, 3, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Hurst, M.R.; Beard, S.S.; Jackson, T.A.; Jones, S.M. Isolation and characterization of the Serratia entomophila antifeeding prophage. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 270, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tseng, T.-T.; Tyler, B.M.; Setubal, J.C. Protein secretion systems in bacterial-host associations, and their description in the Gene Ontology. BMC. Microbiol. 2009, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dean, P. Functional domains and motifs of bacterial type III effector proteins and their roles in infection. FEMS. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 1100–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Foultier, B.; Troisfontaines, P.; Müller, S.; Opperdoes, F.R.; Cornelis, G.R. Characterization of the ysa pathogenicity locus in the chromosome of Yersinia enterocolitica and phylogeny analysis of type III secretion systems. J. Mol. Evol. 2002, 55, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Leo, J.C.; Skurnik, M. Adhesins of human pathogens from the genus Yersinia. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2011, 715, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Walker, K.A.; Miller, V.L. Regulation of the Ysa type III secretion system of Yersinia enterocolitica by YsaE/SycB and YsrS/YsrR. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 4056–4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Costa, T.R.; Felisberto-Rodrigues, C.; Meir, A.; Prevost, M.S.; Redzej, A.; Trokter, M.; Waksman, G. Secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria: Structural and mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 343–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Korotkov, K.V.; Sandkvist, M.; Hol, W.G. The type II secretion system: Biogenesis, molecular architecture and mechanism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 336–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lally, E.T.; Hill, R.B.; Kieba, I.R.; Korostoff, J. The interaction between RTX toxins and target cells. Trends Microbiol. 1999, 7, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ge, Z.; Schauer, D.B.; Fox, J.G. In vivo virulence properties of bacterial cytolethal-distending toxin. Cell. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 1599–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Guerra, L.; Cortes-Bratti, X.; Guidi, R.; Frisan, T. The biology of the cytolethal distending toxins. Toxins 2011, 3, 172–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Palma, L.; Muñoz, D.; Berry, C.; Murillo, J.; Caballero, P. Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: An overview of their biocidal activity. Toxins 2014, 6, 3296–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Warren, G.W. Vegetative insecticidal proteins: Novel proteins for control of corn pests. In Advances in Insect Control: The Role of Transgenic Plants; Carozzi, N.B., Koziel, M.G., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 1997; pp. 109–121. [Google Scholar]
  52. Han, S.; Craig, J.A.; Putnam, C.D.; Carozzi, N.B.; Tainer, J.A. Evolution and mechanism from structures of an ADP-ribosylating toxin and NAD complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 1999, 6, 932–936. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tang, W.-J.; Guo, Q. The adenylyl cyclase activity of anthrax edema factor. Mol. Aspects Med. 2009, 30, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Worley, M.J.; Ching, K.H.; Heffron, F. Salmonella SsrB activates a global regulon of horizontally acquired genes. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 36, 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jank, T.; Eckerle, S.; Steinemann, M.; Trillhaase, C.; Schimpl, M.; Wiese, S.; van Aalten, D.M.; Driever, W.; Aktories, K. Tyrosine glycosylation of Rho by Yersinia toxin impairs blastomere cell behaviour in zebrafish embryos. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dhar, M.S.; Virdi, J.S. Strategies used by Yersinia enterocolitica to evade killing by the host: Thinking beyond Yops. Microbes Infect. 2014, 16, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mühlenkamp, M.; Oberhettinger, P.; Leo, J.C.; Linke, D.; Schütz, M.S. Yersinia adhesin A (YadA)-beauty & beast. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 305, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Opota, O.; Vallet-Gély, I.; Vincentelli, R.; Kellenberger, C.; Iacovache, I.; Gonzalez, M.R.; Roussel, A.; van der Goot, F.-G.; Lemaitre, B. Monalysin, a novel β-pore-forming toxin from the Drosophila pathogen Pseudomonas entomophila, contributes to host intestinal damage and lethality. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hurst, M.R.H.; Glare, T.R.; Jackson, T.A. Cloning Serratia entomophila anti-feeding genes—A putative defective prophage active against the grass grub Costelytra zealandica. J. Bact. 2004, 186, 5116–5128. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vigneux, F.F.; Zumbihl, R.; Jubelin, G.; Ribeiro, C.; Poncet, J.; Baghdiguian, S.; Givaudan, A.; Brehélin, M. The xaxAB Genes encoding a new apoptotic toxin from the insect pathogen Xenorhabdus nematophila are present in plant and human pathogens. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 9571–9580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Brown, S.E.; Cao, A.T.; Dobson, P.; Hines, E.R.; Akhurst, R.J.; East, P.D. Txp40, a ubiquitous insecticidal toxin protein from Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1653–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Coburn, B.; Sekirov, I.; Finlay, B.B. Type III secretion systems and disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Matsumoto, H.; Young, G.M. Proteomic and functional analysis of the suite of Ysp proteins exported by the Ysa type III secretion system of Yersinia enterocolitica Biovar 1B. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 689–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Fauvarque, M.O.; Bergeret, E.; Chabert, J.; Daucheux, D.; Satre, M.; Attree, I. Role and activation of type III secretion system genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced Drosophila killing. Microb. Pathog. 2002, 32, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wenzel, S.; Martins, B.M.; Rösch, P.; Wöhrl, B.M. Crystal structure of the human transcription elongation factor DSIF hSpt4 subunit in complex with the hSpt5 dimerization interface. Biochem. J. 2009, 425, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Brugirard-Ricaud, K.; Duchaud, E.; Givaudan, A.; Girard, P.A.; Kunst, F.; Boemare, N.; Brehélin, M.; Zumbihl, R. Site-specific antiphagocytic function of the Photorhabdus luminescens type III secretion system during insect colonization. Cell Microbiol. 2005, 7, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nivaskumar, M.; Francetic, O. Type II secretion system: A magic beanstalk or a protein escalator. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 1568–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Frederiksen, R.F.; Yoshimura, Y.; Storgaard, B.G.; Paspaliari, D.K.; Petersen, B.O.; Chen, K.; Larsen, T.; Duus, J.O.; Ingmer, H.; Bovin, N.V.; et al. A diverse range of bacterial and eukaryotic chitinases hydrolyzes the LacNAc (Galβ1-4GlcNAc) and LacdiNAc (GalNAcβ1-4GlcNAc) motifs found on vertebrate and insect cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 5354–5366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Held, K.G.; LaRock, C.N.; D’Argenio, D.A.; Berg, C.A.; Collins, C.M. Metalloprotease secreted by the insect pathogen Photorhabdus luminescens induces melanization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7622–7628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ishii, K.; Adachi, T.; Hara, T.; Hamamoto, H.; Sekimizu, K. Identification of a Serratia marcescens virulence factor that promotes hemolymph bleeding in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 117, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Massaoud, M.K.; Marokházi, J.; Venekei, I. Enzymatic characterization of a serralysin-like metalloprotease from the entomopathogen bacterium, Xenorhabdus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Prot. Proteom. 2011, 1814, 1333–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Białas, N.; Kasperkiewicz, K.; Radziejewska-Lebrecht, J.; Skurnik, N. Bacterial cell surface structures in Yersinia enterocolitica. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2012, 60, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mahajan-Miklos, S.; Rahme, L.G.; Ausubel, F.M. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms of bacterial virulence using non-mammalian hosts. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 37, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Rahme, L.G.; Stevens, E.J.; Wolfort, S.F.; Shao, J.; Tompkins, R.G.; Ausubel, F.M. Common virulence factors for bacterial pathogenicity in plants and animals. Science 1995, 268, 1899–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Rahme, L.G.; Ausubel, F.M.; Cao, H.; Drenkard, E.; Goumnerov, B.C.; Lau, G.W.; Mahajan-Miklos, S.; Plotnikova, J.; Tan, M.W.; Tsongalis, J.; et al. Plants and animals share functionally common bacterial virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 8815–8821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Waterfield, N.R.; Wren, B.W.; Ffrench-Constant, R.H. Invertebrates as a source of emerging human pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 833–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Heermann, R.; Fuchs, T.M. Comparative analysis of the Photorhabdus luminescens and the Yersinia enterocolitica genomes: Uncovering candidate genes involved in insect pathogenicity. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Aktories, K.; Schwan, C.; Papatheodorou, P.; Lang, A.E. Bidirectional attack on the actin cytoskeleton. Bacterial protein toxins causing polymerization or depolymerization of actin. Toxicon 2012, 60, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Schiavo, G.; van der Goot, F.G. The bacterial toxin toolkit. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 2, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Yang, G.; Dowling, A.J.; Gerike, U.; Ffrench-Constant, R.H.; Waterfield, N.R. Photorhabdus virulence cassettes confer injectable insecticidal activity against the wax moth. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 2254–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Lemichez, E.; Flatau, G.; Bruzzone, M.; Boquet, P.; Gauthier, M. Molecular localization of the Escherichia coli cytotoxic necrotizing factor CNF1 cell-binding and catalytic domains. Mol. Microbiol. 1997, 24, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Owuama, C.I. Entomopathogenic symbiotic bacteria, Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus of nematodes. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cox, M.P.; Peterson, D.A.; Biggs, P.J. SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Crusoe, M.R.; Alameldin, H.F.; Awad, S.; Boucher, E.; Caldwell, A.; Cartwright, R.; Charbonneau, A.; Constantinides, B.; Edvenson, G.; Fay, S.; et al. The khmer software package: Enabling efficient nucleotide sequence analysis. F1000Res. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Margulies, M.; Egholm, M.; Altman, W.E.; Attiya, S.; Bader, J.S.; Bemben, L.A.; Berka, J.; Braverman, M.S.; Chen, Y.-J.; Chen, Z.; et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 2005, 437, 376–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 228, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Angiuoli, S.V.; Gussman, A.; Klimke, W.; Cochrane, G.; Field, D.; Garrity, G.; Kodira, C.D.; Kyrpides, N.; Madupu, R.; Markowitz, V.; et al. Toward an online repository of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for (meta)genomic annotation. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2008, 12, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kristensen, D.M.; Kannan, L.; Coleman, M.K.; Wolf, Y.I.; Sorokin, A.; Koonin, E.V.; Mushegian, A. A low-polynomial algorithm for assembling clusters of orthologous groups from intergenomic symmetric best matches. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1481–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Altermann, E.; Klaenhammer, T.R. GAMOLA: A new local solution for sequence annotation and analyzing draft and finished prokaryotic genomes. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2003, 7, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Pedersen, A.G.; Jensen, L.J.; Brunak, S.; Staerfeldt, H.H.; Ussery, D.W. A DNA structural atlas for Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 299, 907–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Harris, R.S. Improved Pairwise Alignment of Genomic DNA. Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
Toxins 08 00143 g001 1024
Figure 1. Genome Atlas diagram of the Y. entomophaga genome compared with those of Y. enterocolitica 8081 and Y. ruckeri ATCC 29473. The image represents a circular view of the complete genome sequence. Innermost circle 1: GC-Skew. Circle 2: COG classification: 1. information storage and processing; 2. cellular processes and signaling; 3. metabolism; 4. poorly characterized; and 5. ORFs with uncharacterized COGs or no COG assignment. Circle 3: Prediction of membrane-bound and cell surface proteins. White: no transmembrane helices (TMH) were identified. Black: ORFs with at least one TMH. Red: ORFs predicted to encompass a signal peptide sequence. Blue: ORFs predicted to incorporate both TMH and a signal peptide sequence. Circle 4: ORF orientation. ORFs in the sense orientation (ORF+) are shown in blue; ORFs oriented in the anti-sense direction (ORF−) are in red. Circle 5: G+C content deviation. Deviations from the average G+C content are shown in either green (low G+C spike) or orange (high G+C spike). Circles 6–8: BlastP comparison of the Y. entomophaga ORFeome with custom Y. enterocolitica 8081, Y. ruckeri ATCC 29473 Blast databases. Regions in blue represent unique proteins in Y. entomophaga, while highly conserved features are shown in red. The degree of color saturation corresponds with the level of similarity. Circle 9: Order of the numbered contigs comprising the draft genome. Contig names are shown in red, refer to Section 4.3 for contig information. Regions and ORFs of specific interest are shown at their respective genome location, bars are drawn to scale.
Figure 1. Genome Atlas diagram of the Y. entomophaga genome compared with those of Y. enterocolitica 8081 and Y. ruckeri ATCC 29473. The image represents a circular view of the complete genome sequence. Innermost circle 1: GC-Skew. Circle 2: COG classification: 1. information storage and processing; 2. cellular processes and signaling; 3. metabolism; 4. poorly characterized; and 5. ORFs with uncharacterized COGs or no COG assignment. Circle 3: Prediction of membrane-bound and cell surface proteins. White: no transmembrane helices (TMH) were identified. Black: ORFs with at least one TMH. Red: ORFs predicted to encompass a signal peptide sequence. Blue: ORFs predicted to incorporate both TMH and a signal peptide sequence. Circle 4: ORF orientation. ORFs in the sense orientation (ORF+) are shown in blue; ORFs oriented in the anti-sense direction (ORF−) are in red. Circle 5: G+C content deviation. Deviations from the average G+C content are shown in either green (low G+C spike) or orange (high G+C spike). Circles 6–8: BlastP comparison of the Y. entomophaga ORFeome with custom Y. enterocolitica 8081, Y. ruckeri ATCC 29473 Blast databases. Regions in blue represent unique proteins in Y. entomophaga, while highly conserved features are shown in red. The degree of color saturation corresponds with the level of similarity. Circle 9: Order of the numbered contigs comprising the draft genome. Contig names are shown in red, refer to Section 4.3 for contig information. Regions and ORFs of specific interest are shown at their respective genome location, bars are drawn to scale.
Toxins 08 00143 g001
Toxins 08 00143 g002 1024
Figure 2. Schematic of virulence-associated Regions 1 (A) and 2 (B), which encode a range of toxin components, iron acquisition systems, and adhesin-encoding genes. The positions of Regions 1 and 2 relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1. Arrows denote: speckled: putative virulence determinant; grey fill: characterized ortholog; horizontal waves: proteolytic/substrate binding protein; no fill: hypothetical protein; checkered: regulator protein; cross-hatched: fimbrial/pili-associated protein. Selected loci are labeled, refer to Table 1 for locus annotation.
Figure 2. Schematic of virulence-associated Regions 1 (A) and 2 (B), which encode a range of toxin components, iron acquisition systems, and adhesin-encoding genes. The positions of Regions 1 and 2 relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1. Arrows denote: speckled: putative virulence determinant; grey fill: characterized ortholog; horizontal waves: proteolytic/substrate binding protein; no fill: hypothetical protein; checkered: regulator protein; cross-hatched: fimbrial/pili-associated protein. Selected loci are labeled, refer to Table 1 for locus annotation.
Toxins 08 00143 g002
Toxins 08 00143 g003 1024
Figure 3. Schematic of Y. entomophaga Rhs-associated regions Rhs2–Rhs5. The positions of Rhs-associated regions relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1. Arrows denote: speckled: putative virulence determinant; black fill: IS or transposon element; forward diagonal: Rhs element; grey fill: characterized ortholog; no fill: hypothetical protein; checkered: regulator. Dashed horizontal line denotes region of ~70% DNA identity of the Rhs-associated Region 3 to the S. fonticola strain DSM 4576 genome sequence (gb|CP011254.1). Box foward diagonals located within Rhs-associated Region 3, denotes BlastX non functional translated Rhs similarty. tRNA loci are indicated, selected loci are labeled, refer to Table S2 for locus annotation.
Figure 3. Schematic of Y. entomophaga Rhs-associated regions Rhs2–Rhs5. The positions of Rhs-associated regions relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1. Arrows denote: speckled: putative virulence determinant; black fill: IS or transposon element; forward diagonal: Rhs element; grey fill: characterized ortholog; no fill: hypothetical protein; checkered: regulator. Dashed horizontal line denotes region of ~70% DNA identity of the Rhs-associated Region 3 to the S. fonticola strain DSM 4576 genome sequence (gb|CP011254.1). Box foward diagonals located within Rhs-associated Region 3, denotes BlastX non functional translated Rhs similarty. tRNA loci are indicated, selected loci are labeled, refer to Table S2 for locus annotation.
Toxins 08 00143 g003
Toxins 08 00143 g004 1024
Figure 4. Schematic of the Y. entomophaga type II (T2SS) and III (T3SS) secretion systems. (A) the Y. entomophaga T3SSs T3SSYE1 and T3SSYE2. Orthologs shared between T3SSYE1 and T3SSYE2 are similarly shaded. (B) Y. entomophaga type II (T2SS). Arrows denote: black fill: IS or transposon element; grey fill: characterized ortholog; no fill: hypothetical protein; checkered: regulator protein; verticle dashes: cellular transport protein. tRNA loci are indicated, selected loci are labeled, refer to Table S3, for locus annotation. The positions of these protein secretion regions relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 4. Schematic of the Y. entomophaga type II (T2SS) and III (T3SS) secretion systems. (A) the Y. entomophaga T3SSs T3SSYE1 and T3SSYE2. Orthologs shared between T3SSYE1 and T3SSYE2 are similarly shaded. (B) Y. entomophaga type II (T2SS). Arrows denote: black fill: IS or transposon element; grey fill: characterized ortholog; no fill: hypothetical protein; checkered: regulator protein; verticle dashes: cellular transport protein. tRNA loci are indicated, selected loci are labeled, refer to Table S3, for locus annotation. The positions of these protein secretion regions relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1.
Toxins 08 00143 g004
Toxins 08 00143 g005 1024
Figure 5. Schematic of putative Y. entomophaga accessory virulence determinants. The positions of these virulence determinants relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1. Arrows denote: speckled: putative virulence determinant; grey fill: characterized ortholog; no fill: hypothetical protein; checkered: regulator protein; cross-hatched: fimbrial/pili-associated protein; horizontal waves: proteolytic/substrate binding protein; verticle dashes: cellular transport protein. Selected loci are labeled, refer to Table S4 for locus annotation.
Figure 5. Schematic of putative Y. entomophaga accessory virulence determinants. The positions of these virulence determinants relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1. Arrows denote: speckled: putative virulence determinant; grey fill: characterized ortholog; no fill: hypothetical protein; checkered: regulator protein; cross-hatched: fimbrial/pili-associated protein; horizontal waves: proteolytic/substrate binding protein; verticle dashes: cellular transport protein. Selected loci are labeled, refer to Table S4 for locus annotation.
Toxins 08 00143 g005
Toxins 08 00143 g006 1024
Figure 6. Amino acid sequence alignment of the Y. entomophaga serralysins PL78_03960; PL78_03965; PL78_03970. The Zn-endopeptidase metal-binding motif (HexxHxxGxxH) is indicated. Refer to Figure 2A for relative position of the serralysin-associated gene cluster within Region 1.
Figure 6. Amino acid sequence alignment of the Y. entomophaga serralysins PL78_03960; PL78_03965; PL78_03970. The Zn-endopeptidase metal-binding motif (HexxHxxGxxH) is indicated. Refer to Figure 2A for relative position of the serralysin-associated gene cluster within Region 1.
Toxins 08 00143 g006
Toxins 08 00143 g007 1024
Figure 7. Schematic of selected Y. entomophaga cell surface appendage-encoding genes. Fimbrial-associated island (FAIYE96)-, cellulose gene cluster (CEL)-, and the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-encoding regions. The positions of these regions relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1. Arrows denote: checkered: regulator; cross-hatched: fimbrial/pili-associated protein; verticle dashes: cellular transport; grey fill: characterized ortholog; no fill: hypothetical protein; tRNA loci are indicated, selected loci are labeled, refer to Table S5 for locus annotation.
Figure 7. Schematic of selected Y. entomophaga cell surface appendage-encoding genes. Fimbrial-associated island (FAIYE96)-, cellulose gene cluster (CEL)-, and the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-encoding regions. The positions of these regions relative to the draft Y. entomophaga genome sequence are shown in Figure 1. Arrows denote: checkered: regulator; cross-hatched: fimbrial/pili-associated protein; verticle dashes: cellular transport; grey fill: characterized ortholog; no fill: hypothetical protein; tRNA loci are indicated, selected loci are labeled, refer to Table S5 for locus annotation.
Toxins 08 00143 g007
Table
Table 1. Functional categories of Yersinia entomophaga clusters of orthologous groups (COGs).
Table 1. Functional categories of Yersinia entomophaga clusters of orthologous groups (COGs).
CodeValue% of TotalCOG Category
A20.05RNA processing and modification
B00.0Chromatin structure and dynamics
C1974.7Energy production and conversion
D320.7Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
E3247.6Amino acid transport and metabolism
F882.1Nucleotide transport and metabolism
G2385.6Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
H1573.7Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I912.2Lipid transport and metabolism
J1804.2Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis
K2505.9Transcription
L1613.8Replication, recombination, and repair
M2084.9Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N1052.5Cell motility
O1293Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
P2395.7Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q711.7Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism
R3598.5General function prediction only
S3257.7Function unknown
T1934.5Signal transduction mechanisms
U1303.1Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
V431Defense mechanisms
-70316.6Not in COGs
Total4225--
Table
Table 2. Known and putative Y. entomophaga toxin components.
Table 2. Known and putative Y. entomophaga toxin components.
Putative Toxin or Toxin Encoding Gene ClusterLocus (Putative Virulence-Associated Region) 1Predicted Function
Rhs1 (Yen-TC)PL78_03740-03770orally active toxin complex
Rhs2 (LopT)PL78_18780 (PL78_18715-18790)Hemoceolic active toxin
Rhs3 (Spt4)PL78_00990 (PL78_00895-01045)T6SS, hemoceolic active toxin
Rhs4 (T3SS, T6SS)PL78_12135 (PL78_12045-12170)Hemoceolic active toxin
Rhs5PL78_15070 (PL78_15035-15075) Effector island
YenT (Yst)PL78_03785Heat-stable enterotoxin
PirABPL78_09590-09595Hemoceolic active toxin
CdtABPL78_18444-18445Hemoceolic active toxin
RTXPL78_16910Repeats in toxin
adenylate cyclasePL78_08395Hemoceolic active toxin
Vip2PL78_16145Hemoceolic active toxin
LopTPL78_18760T3SS effector, hemoceolic active toxin
T3SS1PL78_18075-18225Type three secretion system
T3SS2PL78_14485-14620Type three secretion system
1 Refer to Tables S1–S5 for locus annotation.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hurst, M.R.H.; Beattie, A.; Altermann, E.; Moraga, R.M.; Harper, L.A.; Calder, J.; Laugraud, A. The Draft Genome Sequence of the Yersinia entomophaga Entomopathogenic Type Strain MH96T. Toxins 2016, 8, 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050143

AMA Style

Hurst MRH, Beattie A, Altermann E, Moraga RM, Harper LA, Calder J, Laugraud A. The Draft Genome Sequence of the Yersinia entomophaga Entomopathogenic Type Strain MH96T. Toxins. 2016; 8(5):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hurst, Mark R. H., Amy Beattie, Eric Altermann, Roger M. Moraga, Lincoln A. Harper, Joanne Calder, and Aurelie Laugraud. 2016. "The Draft Genome Sequence of the Yersinia entomophaga Entomopathogenic Type Strain MH96T" Toxins 8, no. 5: 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050143

APA Style

Hurst, M. R. H., Beattie, A., Altermann, E., Moraga, R. M., Harper, L. A., Calder, J., & Laugraud, A. (2016). The Draft Genome Sequence of the Yersinia entomophaga Entomopathogenic Type Strain MH96T. Toxins, 8(5), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop