Next Article in Journal
Design and Simulation of a Ring Transducer Array for Ultrasound Retinal Stimulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Pressure Sensor Based Wearable Pulse Detection Device for Radial Pulse Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Manufacturing Imperfections on the Performance of Metalenses and a Manufacturing-Tolerant Design Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Side Profile on Acoustic Streaming by Oscillating Microstructures in Channel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Smart Manufacturing Processes of Low-Tortuous Structures for High-Rate Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices

1
Industry Academia Innovation School, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
2
International College of Semiconductor Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(9), 1534; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091534
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micro and Smart Devices and Systems, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
To maximize the performance of energy storage systems more effectively, modern batteries/supercapacitors not only require high energy density but also need to be fully recharged within a short time or capable of high-power discharge for electric vehicles and power applications. Thus, how to improve the rate capability of batteries or supercapacitors is a very important direction of research and engineering. Making low-tortuous structures is an efficient means to boost power density without replacing materials or sacrificing energy density. In recent years, numerous manufacturing methods have been developed to prepare low-tortuous configurations for fast ion transportation, leading to impressive high-rate electrochemical performance. This review paper summarizes several smart manufacturing processes for making well-aligned 3D microstructures for batteries and supercapacitors. These techniques can also be adopted in other advanced fields that require sophisticated structural control to achieve superior properties.

1. Introduction

Living in the era of electric vehicles (EVs), millions of scientists, engineers, and technicians have been relentlessly improving EV battery performance. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) stand out among all energy storage systems for EVs because of their high energy density and great cycle life. Additionally, fast charging and discharging capabilities are critical for EVs to have a similar driving mode as that of gasoline cars [1,2,3,4,5]. Short recharge time is necessary for long-distance traveling or EV owners who do not have a private garage/parking lot equipped with a battery charger. The Vehicle Technologies Office of USDOE has announced that their program aims to reduce the EV charge time to 15 min or less [6]. Large output power is also important to have a good acceleration on a highway or when carrying heavy loads. Tesla’s superchargers can offer a very fast charge rate of 120–145 kW, shortening the recharge time to approximately 30 min [3]. Nevertheless, the threshold for recharge speed comes from the battery but not the charger.
When a LIB is charging, lithium ions are extracted from the cathode, migrating through the winding routes formed in the interstitial space between electrode particles. Then, lithium ions swim in the electrolyte and reach the anode surface, while the ions again have to move through tortuous channels to complete the charge transfer reactions (Figure 1a). In order to enhance the rate capability of electrochemical energy storage devices, without replacing their electrochemistry and materials, reducing the tortuosity of the electrode (Figure 1b) is an inevitable means during battery cell manufacturing. With a rational design of the electrode structure, ions can follow the shortest path to penetrate the electrode, thereby achieving fast kinetics of electrochemical reactions. Additionally, this concept may also be employed in advanced solid-state battery systems to improve their power density [7,8,9].
Figure 1c shows how tortuosity (τ) is defined, which is calculated using the square value of ion diffusion length (L′) divided by the shortest distance of the imagined ion diffusion (L) without considering the interference from obstacles [10]:
τ = ( L L ) 2
The effective diffusivity of ions in an electrode with pores can be expressed as [10,11]:
D e f f = D ( ε τ )
where ε is the porosity of the electrode and D is the diffusion coefficient of ions in the electrochemical system. This equation clearly suggests that higher porosity and lower tortuosity will promote fast ion diffusion, enabling excellent extreme fast charging (XFC) capability for an energy storage system. In fact, the tortuosity can be expressed as a function or porosity, according to the Bruggeman relationship [12]:
τ = ε 1 α
where α is the constant called the Bruggeman exponent, which depends upon the morphology, porosity, material, and particle size distribution of the components in the electrode. The major tool to determine the tortuosity of the electrode is electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) [11,13,14,15]. Some researchers have applied 2D/3D microstructure and tomographic image processing methods to give an estimate of tortuosity [10,16,17].
In this review, smart manufacturing technologies used to fabricate low-tortuous electrodes are introduced and categorized. Their correlated high-rate performance data, especially fast charging features, are also presented. For a scalable production, the processing complexity and cost-effectiveness of selected tools are taken into account when judging the practicality of the manufacturing methods and their capability to be commercialized. In the following sections, different manufacturing methods of making low-tortuous electrodes are introduced and compared in terms of electrochemical performance and commercial practicality.

2. Template-Directed Manufacturing for Low-Tortuous Structures

2.1. Anodic Aluminium Oxide Templated Methods

Using a porous template with a vertically aligned channel structure is a facile means to make low-tortuous electrodes with great power density. Porous-type anodic aluminum oxides (AAOs), made from the anodization of aluminum in acidic electrolytes, have been widely studied and utilized in energy applications [18,19,20]. AAO-derived low-tortuous electrodes possess a neatly arranged three-dimensional porous structure, which can direct ions to flow through the shortest path, thereby resulting in excellent rate capability in batteries and supercapacitors [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Figure 2 gives an example of a Si nanomesh anode for LIBs, fabricated by using AAO as the template to sequentially deposit a silver buffer layer and silicon via sputtering, followed by the coating of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) supporting the polymer layer for the electrode transfer step [32]. AAO, silver, and PMMA were all removed to complete the low-tortuous electrode manufacturing. The as-prepared Si nanomesh electrode possesses well-aligned holes ~70 nm in diameter with a density of ~96 holes μm−2, showing a much better rate performance than that of the planar Si nanofilm electrode [32]. The advantages of using AAO as a hard template to make porous electrodes are the (1) highly oriented channel structure, (2) low-cost template material, and (3) easy removal of template for streamlining processing. However, some delicate structural designs require the vacuum deposition of active and buffer materials, which raises the manufacturing cost and, therefore, reduces their scalability.

2.2. Bio-Derived Templated Methods

To make the templated production process more sustainable and eco-friendlier, plenty of approaches utilizing bio-derived templates have been reported. Woods [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], plant fibers [42,43], butterfly wings [44,45], and crab shells [46] were adopted as bio-templates to build low-tortuous structures for smooth ion transportation. Hu et al. developed a multiscale aligned garnet framework enabled by the wood template along with a poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) polymer electrolyte impregnated into the mesopores, showing a high ionic conductivity (1.8 × 10−4 S cm−1) [33]. Figure 3a shows the process flowchart of the wood template preparation. First, the wood was cut perpendicular to the longitudinal direction, followed by mechanical pressing to densify the pore structure shown in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images in Figure 3a. The fibrous nanostructure is highly aligned and can absorb abundant precursors due to the hydrophilicity of wood cellulose and capillary force induced by the orderly aligned pores [33]. The wood template can be removed after a simple pyrolysis treatment. Figure 3b shows the structure of low-tortuous and mesoporous wood-derived carbon as an anode for Na-ion batteries. The anisotropic pores have two sizes (10–15 μm from cellulose fibers and 100–200 μm from vessels) [47,48] with a wall thickness of 1–2 μm and a channel width of 10–15 μm, which enable an ultra-thick wood-derived carbon anode (850 μm) with large mass loading (55 mg cm−2) to deliver a high areal capacity of 13.6 mAh cm−2 [34]. The vertically aligned porous structure can facilitate Na-ion transport, so a much thicker electrode can be designed to achieve higher areal energy density. Crab shells can also serve as a functional template to make nanostructured battery electrodes. Cui et al. used animal shells from various crab species to create the hollow nanochannel structure with an inner diameter of 40–70 nm for the accommodation of silicon anode or sulfur cathode materials [46]. Both bio-templated electrodes demonstrated good rate capability at up to 1C and stable cyclability [46]. Butterfly wings can be used to generate 3D carbon frameworks as well for supplying channels to better access electrolytes, increase redox-active sites, and provide conductive pathways for electrons and ions in the electrode [44]. The butterfly wing-derived carbon can be adopted as both the cathode-supporting substrate and the anode active material, delivering a high energy density of 42.9 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 800 W kg−1 in supercapacitors, indicating its superior high-rate performance from the 3D hierarchical porous structure [44]. Bio-templates have several benefits such as low-cost, environmentally friendly, adjustable morphologies, and facile separation, but the supply of biomaterials must be sustainably consistent to guarantee the production quality.

2.3. Bubble Templated Methods

Other than hard templates, gaseous bubbles can be implemented to make 3D foams for energy storage applications. Dynamic hydrogen bubble template (DHBT) electrodeposition is one example of using bubbles to make the metallic porous structure as the electrode support [49,50,51]. The as-prepared Ni foam scaffold can be used as the 3D current collector to enhance electrical and ionic conductivity. Another approach is introducing NH4HCO3 as a foaming agent to generate NH3 and CO2 gases during the drying step of electrode preparation [52]. This oriented porous electrode structure can promote both the rate performance (≈7 times higher capacity at 5C) and mass loading (≈50% higher with a similar specific capacity), outperforming those of the conventional electrode [52]. Another group utilized NaHCO3, which also produces CO2 gas but requires washing to remove the byproduct NaOH, to form interconnected pores in the electrode [53]. The 3D porous network enabled the LiFePO4 cathode to have excellent rate performance, showing 35% capacity retention at 60C (charge/discharge within 1 min) [53]. Due to the high mobility of bubbles, obtaining well-aligned low-tortuous structures could be challenging.

2.4. Templated Phase Inversion Methods

The template method can also be combined with the phase inversion approach to make well-aligned structures for energy storage devices. Yu et al. covered a stainless-steel mesh on the electrode slurry when executing N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP)-based tape casting (Figure 4a) [54], and the electrode coating layer instantly solidified after water was poured on top of the slurry. The water molecules can substitute the solvent molecules to generate pores with a polymer-poor phase [55,56]. This method successfully creates not only open and aligned microchannels but also thick electrodes with high areal loading (up to 100 mg cm−2), resulting in both high power density and high energy density [54]. Additionally, the solid-state electrolyte system can also apply the templated phase inversion method to build 3D vertically aligned microchannels for the enhancement of ion transport. Figure 4b shows the synthetic process of the low-tortuous perovskite Li0.34La0.51TiO3 (LLTO) solid-state electrolyte [57]. Nylon mesh was implemented as the template with a similar phase inversion reaction between water and NMP to form a dense skin layer, and the top-down growth continued until the formation of the bottom layer was completed [57]. The LLTO electrolyte with 3D microchannels showed significantly lower interfacial resistance than that of planar LLTO (reduced from 853 to 133 Ω cm2) due to the shorter diffusion distance in the interdigitated structure built by the low-tortuous LLTO electrolyte and LFP cathode, demonstrating that the unique structure can support efficient and fast ion transport in the cell [57]. Other related examples including the carbon-sulfur composite cathodes [58], all-ceramic lithium-ion batteries [59], nitrogen-doped carbon electrodes for supercapacitors, and cathode support of solid oxide electrolysis cells [60] all show superior performance under high current rates by adopting the templated phase inversion method.

3. Low-Tortuous Structural Design via Cooling or Heating

3.1. Directional Freezing Methods

Freeze drying with controlled cooling is a famous method of introducing a low-tortuous structure into electrodes. The electrode components or precursors are first dispersed in the aqueous solution, followed by the freezing from the bottom of the solution to grow ice crystals along with the temperature gradient vertically. The unfrozen solid substances are separated by the ice columns during continuous freezing, resulting in the well-aligned channels surrounded by the electrode material/substrate. Figure 5a,b display ice-templated carbon aerogels made via the unidirectional freezing as the anode for Na-ion and K-ion batteries [61]. Figure 5c,d show the microstructure of the long and vertically aligned tubular channels formed by the removal of the ice template in the aerogel before and after carbonization, indicating that smooth and fast ion transport can be guaranteed. The honeycomb structure observed from the top view (Figure 5e) indicates that there are abundant connected electron pathways between the microchannels to ensure low electrical resistance during the electrochemical reactions. The as-made carbonaceous electrode achieved high energy densities of ≈220 and ≈118 Wh kg−1 and high rate performances of 206 and 148 mAh g−1 at 2C for Na-ion and K-ion batteries, respectively [61]. In fact, the freezing rate plays an important role to control the dimension of channel/pore formation, and both channel wall thickness and pore spacing are decreased with increasing freezing speed, leading to a higher tortuosity [62]. The directional freezing methods of building low-tortuous structures can also be applied to various material systems for high-rate batteries such as intercalation and conversion cathodes [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74], scaffolds for sulfur cathodes [75,76], intercalation and conversion anodes [71,72,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85], metallic lithium anode hosts [75,86], solid-state electrolytes [87,88,89,90,91], supercapacitor electrodes [39,92], and Al-ion batteries [93], showing their all-around applications.

3.2. Evaporation-Induced Methods

Opposite to the freezing methods, applying heat to the electrode may also facilitate the formation of the low-tortuous structure. Yu et al. developed a vertically aligned nanosheets (VANS) electrode that can promote directional and fast ion transport, illustrated in Figure 6a,b [94]. The evaporation-induced procedure includes slurry preparation with mixed solvents, rapid evaporation, and nanosheet rotation to obtain vertical alignment shown in Figure 6c [94]. The control of the evaporation process is key to the success of electrode orientational ordering, requiring a downward gravity force and upward evaporation flow force to offer sufficient torque for the rotation of nanosheets [94]. As a result, the electrode structure maintains upright alignment due to the fast removal of solvents, leaving no relaxation time for the nanosheets to lie horizontally again. Another study implemented evaporation-induced self-assembly to synthesize mesoporous titanium dioxide/carbon composite electrodes [95]. Multiple polymers were selected to form a suitable block copolymer paired with the titania precursor, and the internal repulsion of specific polymer blocks led to microphase separation during the evaporation process, where oriented mesopores were generated [95]. The prepared electrode can enable high areal mass loading, high bulk density, and high volumetric capacity, originated from the electrode structure with ordered pores.

4. Magnetic/Electric/Shear-Field-Assisted Manufacturing for Low-Tortuous Electrodes

4.1. Magnetic-Field-Assisted Methods

Applying magnetic force during electrode preparation is an effective means to realize highly oriented electrode structures. Either the electrode material or the decorative coating material needs to be magnetically responsive (paramagnetic or ferromagnetic) to fulfill the processing requirement. Cobalt-based cathode materials [96,97], iron oxides [98,99,100,101], cobalt oxides [102], ferrofluids [103,104], multiwalled carbon nanotubes [105], and nickel-based alloys [106] have been successfully used to produce low-tortuous electrodes. Figure 7a demonstrates that the LiCoO2 cathode suspension with magnetized nylon rods can align along with the magnetic field direction and can then be sintered after thermal treatment. The nylon rods decorated by the ferrofluid exhibit great alignment under the magnetic field (Figure 7b). The magnetic emulsion droplets have a similar magnetic alignment effect, which can serve as a sacrificial phase that generates straight and vertical channels after pyrolysis (Figure 7c,d). The modified LiCoO2 electrode with the same porosity as that of the conventional electrode can deliver a three times higher areal capacity and a high-rate capacity at 2C, indicating an effective approach without sacrificing the battery energy density [103]. An ultrahigh areal capacity (up to ≈14 mAh cm−2) for both the graphitic anode and LiCoO2 cathode adopting the same strategy has also been reported from the same group [101].

4.2. Electric-Field-Assisted Methods

The electric field is another source of non-contact force to align the materials for low-tortuous structures. Figure 8 gives an example of combining electrophoresis and freeze drying to make a low-tortuous structure with hollow channels [107]. The electrophoresis deposition guides the graphene oxide nanosheets through the colloid to the electrode under the electric field, and the graphene oxide nanosheets can orient vertically on top of the electrode. With the following freezing process, the pores can be further expanded and secured. The vertically aligned reduced graphene can deliver a high specific capacitance (78% of that at 2 mV s−1) at a high scan rate of 500 mV s−1 in an electrochemical capacitor [107]. The authors claimed that this method can be adopted to any colloid with a negative surface charge for the film electrode preparation with a controllable thickness and pore size [107]. An earlier study also reported that sulfur-graphene composite nanosheets can self-assemble into perpendicular nanowalls driven by the electric field [108]. A good high-rate capacity (over 400 mAh g−1 at 8C) can be obtained in the highly oriented nanowall electrode in Li-S cells [108].

4.3. Shear-Field-Assisted Methods

Other than the non-contact force induced by the magnetic field or electric field, the shear force can also be applied to obtain low-tortuous structures. Yang et al. employed the mechanical shear field to directionally orientate the 2D MXene (Ti3C2Tx) material for better ion transport, shown in Figure 9a [109]. By applying an external shear force, the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets can be vertically aligned even with a much greater thickness because the higher-order discotic lamellar phase formed under the assistance of a surfactant (Figure 9b) can turn perpendicularly to the shear direction (Figure 9c) [109,110,111,112]. The non-ionic surfactant used in this study (hexaethylene glycol monododecyl ether) can enhance the stacking symmetry when multiple MXene sheets integrate into liquid crystals. As a result, the areal capacitances of the vertically aligned Mxene films in supercapacitors with either a thinner or a thicker configuration (the mass loading ranging from 2.80 to 6.16 mg cm−2) are similar while operating at a high cycling rate (ranging from 1000 to 2000 mV s−1) [109]. The shear-field-assisted alignment of the liquid crystal mesophase of nanomaterials can be further utilized in other applications such as filtration, fuel cells, catalysis, and photovoltaics for superior performance [109].

5. Low-Tortuous Electrodes Enabled by Advanced Printing

5.1. Additive Manufacturing Methods

Additive manufacturing techniques, also known as 3D printing, are advanced manufacturing methods overwhelmingly adopted in multiple fields in the last decade. Large-scale customization, food, vehicles, buildings, weapons, and aerospace applications are the mainstream development directions due to the efficiency and customizable features of 3D printing. Using 3D printing to make battery components has also drawn much attention in recent years, especially in making well-aligned structures. Many electrochemical energy storage systems such as Li-ion batteries [113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125], Li-S/Se batteries [126,127,128,129,130,131,132], metallic lithium batteries [133,134,135,136,137], solid-state electrolytes [138], Na-ion batteries [139,140], Na-ion capacitors [141], Na-oxygen batteries [142], Ni-Fe batteries [143], Zn-ion batteries [139,144,145], and Zn-air batteries [146] have boosted their rate capability by using 3D-printed structural designs. Figure 10a illustrates how to make a freestanding electrode via 3D printing technology [113]. A viscous ink including all the necessary electrode ingredients is prepared, followed by 3D printing under a computer-controlled system to build a specific patterned structure. The electrode may need appropriate drying and/or calcination processes afterward to complete the process. Figure 10b,c demonstrate a few different patterns that can be achieved in 3D-printed electrodes. Figure 10d displays the microstructures of electrodes with various low-tortuous structures, which can facilitate high-rate battery performance. It was found that the electrode with a 3D line structure can give the highest capacity and the best cycle stability than those with the grid or ring structure, probably because of the relatively simple and consistent channel structure of the 3D line pattern [113]. The ultrathick 3D-printed electrode (8 layers; 1500 μm) gave excellent electrochemical performance, delivering a high areal capacity of 7.5 mAh cm−2 and a high energy density of 69.41 J cm−2 at a power density of 2.99 mW cm−2 [113].

5.2. Stamping Methods

Stamping is an old-fashioned way to print repeated patterns on the substrate, which can also be used to make electrodes with special designs, particularly interdigitated structures. The interdigitated electrode design has several merits, including no separators required, reduction in ion transport resistance, and capability of being integrated into circuits and micro devices [147,148,149]. In this case, stamping is an efficient means to quickly reproduce micro-electrodes for energy storage devices. Figure 11a–d show the stamping process to fabricate interdigitated electrodes for micro-supercapacitors [150]. The stamp shapes can be facilely designed by computer-aided 3D models, followed by 3D printing using a polylactic acid filament. One study used MXene slurry as the electrode ink, and the electrode can be stamped onto the substrate with unique patterns [150]. After filling the gel electrolyte (PVA/H2SO4) and wiring silver contacts, an interdigitated solid-state micro-supercapacitor can output an areal capacitance of 50 mF cm−2 at 800 µA cm−2 [150]. The stamping methods have also been applied to prepare micro-battery electrodes with Zn//MnO2 [151] or self-assembled viruses [152], and graphene-based micro-supercapacitor electrodes [153]. A similar concept is utilized in a flexible node-type electrode realized by adding an imprinting step during electrode manufacturing [154]. The only difference is that the grid pattern is made by a post-roll-pressing procedure with a mesh template [154]. The post-patterned electrode also showed better adhesion on metal current collectors, measured by the test displayed in Figure 11e,f, resulting in stable electrochemical performance after 3000 flexing cycles [154].

6. Top-down Manufacturing Process for Low-Tortuous Electrodes

6.1. Laser Drilling Methods

The laser has been used as a mature cutting tool for precise miniature machining on a wide variety of substrates, and the cutting focus could be 25 microns or under with high accuracy [155]. Therefore, the laser can be used to drill low-tortuous holes into electrodes to improve their high-rate capability. Figure 12a–i compare the surface morphology of the LFP electrode with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and carbon nanofibers (CNFs) (CM-LFP), the same electrode but with laser-drilled holes (Laser-CM-LFP), and the LFP electrode prepared with the traditional slurry casting process (Con-LFP) [156]. Thicker electrodes with low-tortuous holes can be fabricated with high areal capacities (3.02 and 5.33 mAh cm−2 from areal loadings of 20.0 and 40.0 mg cm−2, respectively), but still possess great cycle stability [156]. Figure 12j,k show the distribution of lithium-ion flux and current, respectively, indicating fast ion pathways in the drilled hole and concentrated current density around the edge of the hole to promote fast kinetics of electrochemical reactions [156]. The authors also pointed out that the larger the opening of the laser-drilled hole, the lower the ionic resistance that could be obtained [156]. Nevertheless, too large a pore size might degrade the mechanical property of the electrode. Many energy storage devices including Li-ion batteries [157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166], solid-state batteries [167], supercapacitors [168], and redox flow batteries [169,170] can also take advantage of laser drilling to enhance their electrochemical performance. One unique approach using a laser to create micrometer-sized through-holes is for the prelithiation of a graphite anode in the configuration of a laminated lithium-ion battery [171]. In this design, the lithium ions supplied from the additional lithium metal foil can easily penetrate multiple electrode/separator stacks in the laminated cell, shortening the prelithiation process that can be integrated into the formation cycles of the full cell [171].

6.2. Etching Methods

Etching is a classic method to remove materials from the substrate by using corrosive, caustic, or abrasive substances, mostly utilized for printing in ancient times. In modern times, etching has been widely used in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, and many different etching technologies have been developed [172,173,174,175]. Battery scientists have also adopted etching techniques including inductively coupled plasma/reactive ion etching (ICP/RIE) [176,177,178,179,180,181,182], catalytic etching [183], and wet etching [184,185,186] to make different 3D electrode structures for better high-rate performance. Dry etching is a powerful process that can accurately remove unwanted materials with exact quantity and shape with the assistance of patterning and photolithography (Figure 13). The array patterns can be obtained by photolithography (Figure 13a), combining with metal deposition and lift-off (Figure 13b) or with pre-oxidation, acid etching, and photoresist removal processes (Figure 13c) [181]. The low-tortuous silicon electrode forms in vertical arrays after ICP/RIE etching and mask removal (Figure 13e,f), and a high aspect ratio of up to 22 is achievable [181]. Another etching-enabled low-tortuous design is that Duan et al. developed a hierarchically porous holey-graphene framework structure by a simple wet-etching process using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), promoting high-rate capability even at a rate as high as 10C [186]. The 3D porous electrode structure facilitates rapid ion transport by offering internally straight channels in the holey-graphene composite material [186]. The cost-ineffectiveness of dry etching and the poor structural uniformity caused by wet etching are potential limiting factors for etching processes to be employed in energy storage applications.

6.3. Cutting Methods

Cutting or chopping is another method to accomplish top-down manufacturing of low-tortuous electrodes. Fu et al. designed a fiber-aligned thick (FAT) electrode by simply rolling up the electrode with a fibrous substrate followed by cutting into a spiral structure perpendicular to the axial direction (Figure 14a) [187]. The FAT electrode not only has a high areal capacity, controlled by the cutting thickness, but also possesses through-thickness electrode alignment and ample electrolyte channels, facilitating both high energy density and high power density [187]. The fabricated 1 mm thick electrode is made with high areal loading of 128 mg cm−2, which can still deliver a high capacity of 155 mAh g−1 under 0.5 mA cm2 [187]. Other groups also adopted a similar strategy to cut electrode rolls into low-tortuous electrodes for the applications in lithium-oxygen batteries [188] and metallic lithium anodes [189]. Unlike winding, graphene nanosheet composites can form a thick horizontally aligned monolith after vacuum filtration and compression, which can be cut and rotated to create vertically aligned channels as low-tortuous electrodes as well [190]. To cut stacked electrodes perpendicular to the alignment direction may require special tools and crafts to obtain electrodes with a consistent thickness.

7. Summary and Outlook

In the past decade, a tremendous number of smart manufacturing methods have been developed to make low-tortuous electrodes and solid-state electrolytes. Most of them share the same features including high power density, high energy density, high areal loading, and highly efficient active material utilization. Figure 15 summarizes the most popular processes to produce low-tortuous structures. Templating is a classic manufacturing technique that uses a sacrificial framework to form the structure with the same 3D morphology, which gives excellent product uniformity and structural controllability. Freeze drying is a mature drying process implemented when heating is unfavorable to the material. The frozen solvent (usually ice) can grow directionally along with the cooling gradient, leading to vertical channels after the ice crystals are removed during sublimation. Magnetic-field-assisted low-tortuous structure formation is a quite creative approach, which employs the nature of the magnetic moment induced by the applied magnetic field, offering the necessary torque for good alignment. Three-dimensional printing is an emerging technology disrupting various industries. Scientists and engineers make use of the additive manufacturing to produce electrodes with several special state-of-the-art structures for different kinds of applications, including a highly oriented electrode to improve high-rate performance. Laser drilling can precisely control the shape, density, size, and depth of the holes on electrodes, resulting in the design flexibility of making porous electrodes or substrates.
This review article briefly introduces various smart manufacturing methods for low-tortuous structures, which could be implemented in other advanced applications in addition to electrochemical energy storage devices. Manufacturing cost has always been the most fundamental determinant of mass production and commercialization. The cost of the template material and the process of template removal must be low enough for large-scale operation. Bio-derived templates may encounter difficulties with varying quality from different batches of organic matters, although the sustainability of biologic materials is still undoubtedly attractive. Freeze drying seems to be a cost-effective method to build a low-tortuous structure, but the dimension and morphology of each ice crystal column might not be identical, requiring in-depth research to enhance uniformity. Magnetic-field-assisted vertically aligned structure formation needs magnetic substances, which increases the inactive material loading and reduces the versatility of this method. Three-dimensional printing should be further improved by minimizing the size of printed products (i.e., added resolution), so the electrode design will not be limited. Laser drilling is a promising non-contact manufacturing technique due to its high precision and speed. However, the power consumption and facility cost of laser devices could be high but is yet to be confirmed for the production cost-effectiveness before scaling up. To sum up, there are plenty of approaches to construct hierarchical low-tortuous electrodes, but the structural uniformity, low material and processing cost, and device performance targets must be met simultaneously using the same manufacturing technology to achieve the ultimate goal for high-rate energy storage systems.

Author Contributions

C.-Y.K. and Y.-S.S. drafted this review paper together and participated in content discussion and editing of the draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan (110-2113-M-A49-027-MY2) and by the Ministry of Education (MOE) of Taiwan under the Yushan Young Scholar Program and the Higher Education SPROUT Project (111W20281) of National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.

Data Availability Statement

All collected data are presented in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cano, Z.P.; Banham, D.; Ye, S.; Hintennach, A.; Lu, J.; Fowler, M.; Chen, Z. Batteries and Fuel Cells for Emerging Electric Vehicle Markets. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kwade, A.; Haselrieder, W.; Leithoff, R.; Modlinger, A.; Dietrich, F.; Droeder, K. Current Status and Challenges for Automotive Battery Production Technologies. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Cui, Y. Challenges and Opportunities towards Fast-Charging Battery Materials. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schmuch, R.; Wagner, R.; Hörpel, G.; Placke, T.; Winter, M. Performance and Cost of Materials for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Automotive Batteries. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garcia-Valle, R.; Peças Lopes, J.A. (Eds.) Electric Vehicle Integration into Modern Power Networks; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-1-4614-0133-9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Batteries, Charging, and Electric Vehicles; Vehicle Technologies Office: Lower Hutt, New Zealand. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/batteries-charging-and-electric-vehicles (accessed on 20 August 2022).
  7. Ye, L.; Li, X. A Dynamic Stability Design Strategy for Lithium Metal Solid State Batteries. Nature 2021, 593, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dixit, M.B.; Vishugopi, B.S.; Zaman, W.; Kenesei, P.; Park, J.-S.; Almer, J.; Mukherjee, P.P.; Hatzell, K.B. Polymorphism of Garnet Solid Electrolytes and Its Implications for Grain-Level Chemo-Mechanics. Nat. Mater. 2022; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tao, B.; Ren, C.; Li, H.; Liu, B.; Jia, X.; Dong, X.; Zhang, S.; Chang, H. Thio-/LISICON and LGPS-Type Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2203551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ebner, M.; Wood, V. Tool for Tortuosity Estimation in Lithium Ion Battery Porous Electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A3064–A3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thorat, I.V.; Stephenson, D.E.; Zacharias, N.A.; Zaghib, K.; Harb, J.N.; Wheeler, D.R. Quantifying Tortuosity in Porous Li-Ion Battery Materials. J. Power Sources 2009, 188, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bruggeman, D.A.G. Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen. Ann. Phys. 1935, 416, 636–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pouraghajan, F.; Knight, H.; Wray, M.; Mazzeo, B.; Subbaraman, R.; Christensen, J.; Wheeler, D. Quantifying Tortuosity of Porous Li-Ion Battery Electrodes: Comparing Polarization-Interrupt and Blocking-Electrolyte Methods. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Landesfeind, J.; Hattendorff, J.; Ehrl, A.; Wall, W.A.; Gasteiger, H.A. Tortuosity Determination of Battery Electrodes and Separators by Impedance Spectroscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, A1373–A1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Landesfeind, J.; Ebner, M.; Eldiven, A.; Wood, V.; Gasteiger, H.A. Tortuosity of Battery Electrodes: Validation of Impedance-Derived Values and Critical Comparison with 3D Tomography. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A469–A476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen-Wiegart, Y.K.; DeMike, R.; Erdonmez, C.; Thornton, K.; Barnett, S.A.; Wang, J. Tortuosity Characterization of 3D Microstructure at Nano-Scale for Energy Storage and Conversion Materials. J. Power Sources 2014, 249, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hutzenlaub, T.; Asthana, A.; Becker, J.; Wheeler, D.R.; Zengerle, R.; Thiele, S. FIB/SEM-Based Calculation of Tortuosity in a Porous LiCoO2 Cathode for a Li-Ion Battery. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 27, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, Q.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yang, D.; Meng, G.; Sun, S. Rational Design of Novel Nanostructured Arrays Based on Porous AAO Templates for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion. Nano Energy 2019, 55, 234–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wen, L.; Wang, Z.; Mi, Y.; Xu, R.; Yu, S.-H.; Lei, Y. Designing Heterogeneous 1D Nanostructure Arrays Based on AAO Templates for Energy Applications. Small 2015, 11, 3408–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, W.; Park, S.-J. Porous Anodic Aluminum Oxide: Anodization and Templated Synthesis of Functional Nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7487–7556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, W.; Wei, Z.; Xiao, J.; Leung, S.-F.; Lin, Q.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Three-Dimensional Metal/Oxide Nanocone Arrays for High-Performance Electrochemical Pseudocapacitors. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 3626–3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, C.; Gillette, E.I.; Chen, X.; Pearse, A.J.; Kozen, A.C.; Schroeder, M.A.; Gregorczyk, K.E.; Lee, S.B.; Rubloff, G.W. An All-in-One Nanopore Battery Array. Nature Nanotech 2014, 9, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grote, F.; Lei, Y. A Complete Three-Dimensionally Nanostructured Asymmetric Supercapacitor with High Operating Voltage Window Based on PPy and MnO2. Nano Energy 2014, 10, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cho, J.-H.; Picraux, S.T. Enhanced Lithium Ion Battery Cycling of Silicon Nanowire Anodes by Template Growth to Eliminate Silicon Underlayer Islands. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5740–5747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, G.; Wang, D.-W.; Li, F.; Hou, P.-X.; Yin, L.; Liu, C.; Lu, G.Q.; Gentle, I.R.; Cheng, H.-M. A Flexible Nanostructured Sulphur–Carbon Nanotube Cathode with High Rate Performance for Li-S Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8901–8906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Reddy, A.L.M.; Shaijumon, M.M.; Gowda, S.R.; Ajayan, P.M. Multisegmented Au-MnO2/Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Coaxial Arrays for High-Power Supercapacitor Applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 658–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, R.; Duay, J.; Lane, T.; Bok Lee, S. Synthesis and Characterization of RuO2/Poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) Composite Nanotubes for Supercapacitors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 4309–4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, K.; Wei, M.; Morris, M.A.; Zhou, H.; Holmes, J.D. Mesoporous Titania Nanotubes: Their Preparation and Application as Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 3016–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hassoun, J.; Panero, S.; Simon, P.; Taberna, P.L.; Scrosati, B. High-Rate, Long-Life Ni–Sn Nanostructured Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1632–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Taberna, P.L.; Mitra, S.; Poizot, P.; Simon, P.; Tarascon, J.-M. High Rate Capabilities Fe3O4-Based Cu Nano-Architectured Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Battery Applications. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Reddy, A.L.M.; Shaijumon, M.M.; Gowda, S.R.; Ajayan, P.M. Coaxial MnO2/Carbon Nanotube Array Electrodes for High-Performance Lithium Batteries. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1002–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cho, S.; Jang, H.Y.; Jung, I.; Liu, L.; Park, S. Synthesis of Embossing Si Nanomesh and Its Application as an Anode for Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2017, 362, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dai, J.; Fu, K.; Gong, Y.; Song, J.; Chen, C.; Yao, Y.; Pastel, G.; Zhang, L.; Wachsman, E.; Hu, L. Flexible Solid-State Electrolyte with Aligned Nanostructures Derived from Wood. ACS Mater. Lett. 2019, 1, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shen, F.; Luo, W.; Dai, J.; Yao, Y.; Zhu, M.; Hitz, E.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Sprenkle, V.L.; Li, X.; et al. Ultra-Thick, Low-Tortuosity, and Mesoporous Wood Carbon Anode for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y. Enabling High-Areal-Capacity Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Designing Anisotropic and Low-Tortuosity Porous Architectures. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4801–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, G.; Zhang, M.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Huo, L.; Gao, S. Poplar Branch Bio-Template Synthesis of Mesoporous Hollow Co3O4 Hierarchical Architecture as an Anode for Long-Life Lithium Ion Batteries. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 29033–29040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.; Luo, W.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Song, J.; Dai, J.; Hitz, E.M.; Xu, S.; Yang, C.; et al. High-Capacity, Low-Tortuosity, and Channel-Guided Lithium Metal Anode. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3584–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, G.; Wang, G.-Y.; Zhang, X.-F.; Deng, Z.-P.; Huo, L.-H.; Gao, S. Biotemplate Synthesis of Mesoporous α-Fe2O3 Hierarchical Structure with Assisted Pseudocapacitive as an Anode for Long-Life Lithium Ion Batteries. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 3772–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, L.-L.; Lu, Y.-Y.; Xiao, Z.-J.; Zhang, T.-W.; Zhou, F.; Ma, T.; Ni, Y.; Yao, H.-B.; Yu, S.-H.; Cui, Y. Wood-Inspired High-Performance Ultrathick Bulk Battery Electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Song, J.; Luo, W.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Pastel, G.; Xie, J.; et al. Highly Conductive, Lightweight, Low-Tortuosity Carbon Frameworks as Ultrathick 3D Current Collectors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Han, L.; Wang, J.; Mu, X.; Liao, C.; Cai, W.; Zhao, Z.; Kan, Y.; Xing, W.; Hu, Y. Anisotropic, Low-Tortuosity and Ultra-Thick Red P@C-Wood Electrodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 14642–14650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gan, Y.; Xu, F.; Luo, J.; Yuan, H.; Jin, C.; Zhang, L.; Fang, C.; Sheng, O.; Huang, H.; Xia, Y.; et al. One-Pot Biotemplate Synthesis of FeS 2 Decorated Sulfur-Doped Carbon Fiber as High Capacity Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 209, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, Y.; Xiang, K.; Zhu, Y.; Xiao, L.; Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Chen, H. Bio-Template Fabrication of Nitrogen-Doped Li3V2(PO4)3/Carbon Composites from Cattail Fibers and Their High-Rate Performance in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 782, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xue, Y.; Guo, X.; Wu, M.; Chen, J.; Duan, M.; Shi, J.; Zhang, J.; Cao, F.; Liu, Y.; Kong, Q. Zephyranthes-like Co2NiSe4 Arrays Grown on 3D Porous Carbon Frame-Work as Electrodes for Advanced Supercapacitors and Sodium-Ion Batteries. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 3598–3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xia, Y.; Sun, B.; Wei, Y.; Tao, B.; Zhao, Y. Simple Sol-Gel Method Synthesis of 3-Dimension Li4Ti5O12-TiO2 Nanostructures Using Butterfly Wings as Biotemplates for High Rate Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 705, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yao, H.; Zheng, G.; Li, W.; McDowell, M.T.; Seh, Z.; Liu, N.; Lu, Z.; Cui, Y. Crab Shells as Sustainable Templates from Nature for Nanostructured Battery Electrodes. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3385–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nilsson, T.; Rowell, R. Historical wood—Structure and properties. J. Cult. Herit. 2012, 13, S5–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Boatright, S.W.J.; Garrett, G.G. The Effect of Microstructure and Stress State on the Fracture Behaviour of Wood. J. Mater. Sci. 1983, 18, 2181–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yan, X.; Tong, X.; Wang, J.; Gong, C.; Zhang, M.; Liang, L. Construction of Three-Dimensional Porous Nano-Ni/NiO Nanoflake Composite Film for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Mater. Lett. 2013, 106, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Siwek, K.I.; Eugénio, S.; Silva, T.M.; Montemor, M.F. Electrochemical Performance of MnOx·nH2O@Ni Composite Foam Electrodes for Energy Storage in KOH Media. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 281, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Siwek, K.I.; Eugénio, S.; Silva, T.M.; Fatima Montemor, M. Electrodeposited Manganese Oxide on Tailored 3D Bimetallic Nanofoams for Energy Storage Applications. Energy Technol. 2019, 7, 1801139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xiong, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Song, L.; Li, M.; Yang, H.; Huang, Z.; Li, D.; Zhou, H. Scalable Manufacture of High-Performance Battery Electrodes Enabled by a Template-Free Method. Small Methods 2021, 5, 2100280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Singh, D.P.; Mulder, F.M.; Abdelkader, A.M.; Wagemaker, M. Facile Micro Templating LiFePO4 Electrodes for High Performance Li-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, J.; Ju, Z.; Zhang, X.; Quilty, C.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Bock, D.C.; Marschilok, A.C.; Takeuchi, E.S.; Yu, G. Ultrahigh-Capacity and Scalable Architected Battery Electrodes via Tortuosity Modulation. ACS Nano. 2021, 15, 19109–19118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shao, X.; Dong, D.; Parkinson, G.; Li, C.-Z. Microstructure Control of Oxygen Permeation Membranes with Templated Microchannels. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shao, X.; Dong, D.; Parkinson, G.; Li, C.-Z. A Microchanneled Ceramic Membrane for Highly Efficient Oxygen Separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 9641–9644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiang, Z.; Xie, H.; Wang, S.; Song, X.; Yao, X.; Wang, H. Perovskite Membranes with Vertically Aligned Microchannels for All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Choudhury, S.; Fischer, D.; Formanek, P.; Stamm, M.; Ionov, L. Phase Inversion Strategy to Fabricate Porous Carbon for Li-S Batteries via Block Copolymer Self-Assembly. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1701116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ji, S.; Wang, X.; Li, K.; Huan, Y.; Ma, G.; Su, Y.; Wei, T. 3D Vertically Aligned Microchannel Three-Layer All Ceramic Lithium Ion Battery for High-Rate and Long-Cycle Electrochemical Energy Storage. Small 2022, 18, 2107442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dong, D.; Shao, X.; Hu, X.; Chen, K.; Xie, K.; Yu, L.; Ye, Z.; Yang, P.; Parkinson, G.; Li, C.-Z. Improved Gas Diffusion within Microchanneled Cathode Supports of SOECs for Steam Electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 19829–19835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, J.; Xu, Z.; Eloi, J.; Titirici, M.; Eichhorn, S.J. Ice-Templated, Sustainable Carbon Aerogels with Hierarchically Tailored Channels for Sodium- and Potassium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2110862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Delattre, B.; Amin, R.; Sander, J.; De Coninck, J.; Tomsia, A.P.; Chiang, Y.-M. Impact of Pore Tortuosity on Electrode Kinetics in Lithium Battery Electrodes: Study in Directionally Freeze-Cast LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (NCA). J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A388–A395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Huang, S.; Lu, Y.; Wang, T.Q.; Gu, C.D.; Wang, X.L.; Tu, J.P. Polyacrylamide-Assisted Freeze Drying Synthesis of Hierarchical Plate-Arrayed LiV3O8 for High-Rate Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2013, 235, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cheng, J.; Gu, G.; Guan, Q.; Razal, J.M.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, B. Synthesis of a Porous Sheet-like V2O5 –CNT Nanocomposite Using an Ice-Templating ‘Bricks-and-Mortar’ Assembly Approach as a High-Capacity, Long Cyclelife Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 2729–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hu, Y.; Luo, B.; Ye, D.; Zhu, X.; Lyu, M.; Wang, L. An Innovative Freeze-Dried Reduced Graphene Oxide Supported SnS 2 Cathode Active Material for Aluminum-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, X.; Hui, Z.; King, S.; Wang, L.; Ju, Z.; Wu, J.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Marschilok, A.C.; West, A.C.; Takeuchi, E.S.; et al. Tunable Porous Electrode Architectures for Enhanced Li-Ion Storage Kinetics in Thick Electrodes. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 5896–5904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, S.; Xiong, R.; Han, Z.; He, R.; Li, S.; Zhou, H.; Yu, C.; Cheng, S.; Xie, J. Unveiling Low-Tortuous Effect on Electrochemical Performance toward Ultrathick LiFePO4 Electrode with 100 mg cm−2 Area Loading. J. Power Sources 2021, 515, 230588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, C.; Dontigny, M.; Zaghib, K.; Grant, P.S. Low-Tortuosity and Graded Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes by Ice Templating. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 21421–21431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhao, Z.; Sun, M.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Dongfang, N.; Ruan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, P.; Dong, L.; et al. Sandwich, Vertical-Channeled Thick Electrodes with High Rate and Cycle Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1809196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Huang, C.; Grant, P.S. Coral-like Directional Porosity Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes by Ice Templating. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 14689–14699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, X.; Ling, S.; Zeng, L.; He, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C. Directional Freezing Assisted 3D Printing to Solve a Flexible Battery Dilemma: Ultrahigh Energy/Power Density and Uncompromised Mechanical Compliance. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2200233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kang, S.; Hong, S.Y.; Kim, N.; Oh, J.; Park, M.; Chung, K.Y.; Lee, S.-S.; Lee, J.; Son, J.G. Stretchable Lithium-Ion Battery Based on Re-Entrant Micro-Honeycomb Electrodes and Cross-Linked Gel Electrolyte. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 3660–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ju, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lutz, D.M.; Fang, Z.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Takeuchi, E.S.; Marschilok, A.C.; Yu, G. Understanding Thickness-Dependent Transport Kinetics in Nanosheet-Based Battery Electrodes. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 1684–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhou, C.-C.; Su, Z.; Gao, X.-L.; Cao, R.; Yang, S.-C.; Liu, X.-H. Ultra-High-Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries Enabled by Aligned Structured Thick Electrode Design. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, N.; Zhang, X.; Ju, Z.; Yu, X.; Wang, Y.; Du, Y.; Bai, Z.; Dou, S.; Yu, G. Thickness-Independent Scalable High-Performance Li-S Batteries with High Areal Sulfur Loading via Electron-Enriched Carbon Framework. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Han, Z.; Li, S.; Xiong, R.; Jiang, Z.; Sun, M.; Hu, W.; Peng, L.; He, R.; Zhou, H.; Yu, C.; et al. Low Tortuosity and Reinforced Concrete Type Ultra-Thick Electrode for Practical Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2108669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bhattacharya, P.; Kota, M.; Suh, D.H.; Roh, K.C.; Park, H.S. Biomimetic Spider-Web-Like Composites for Enhanced Rate Capability and Cycle Life of Lithium Ion Battery Anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, Y.; Kong, D.; Shi, W.; Liu, B.; Sim, G.J.; Ge, Q.; Yang, H.Y. Ice Templated Free-Standing Hierarchically WS2/CNT-RGO Aerogel for High-Performance Rechargeable Lithium and Sodium Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1601057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pei, L.; Jin, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Liang, J.; Chen, J. Ice-Templated Preparation and Sodium Storage of Ultrasmall SnO2 Nanoparticles Embedded in Three-Dimensional Graphene. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Amin, R.; Delattre, B.; Tomsia, A.P.; Chiang, Y.-M. Electrochemical Characterization of High Energy Density Graphite Electrodes Made by Freeze-Casting. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 4976–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ghadkolai, M.A.; Creager, S.; Nanda, J.; Bordia, R.K. Freeze Tape Cast Thick Mo Doped Li4Ti5O12 Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, A2603–A2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dang, D.; Wang, Y.; Gao, S.; Cheng, Y.-T. Freeze-Dried Low-Tortuous Graphite Electrodes with Enhanced Capacity Utilization and Rate Capability. Carbon 2020, 159, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, X.; Ju, Z.; Housel, L.M.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Singh, G.; Sadique, N.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Takeuchi, E.S.; Marschilok, A.C.; et al. Promoting Transport Kinetics in Li-Ion Battery with Aligned Porous Electrode Architectures. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 8255–8261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Dou, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, F. Nitrogen and Oxygen Co-Doped Porous Carbon Nanosheets as High-Rate and Long-Lifetime Anode Materials for High-Performance Li-Ion Capacitors. Carbon 2019, 151, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Roberts, A.D.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, H. Hierarchical Porous Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Monoliths via Ice-Templating: High Capacity and High-Rate Performance as Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17787–17796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, Q.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Z.; Wang, F.; Liu, W.; Zuo, J.; Gu, X.; Yao, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Vertically Aligned MXene Nanosheet Arrays for High-Rate Lithium Metal Anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2200072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, X.; Zhai, H.; Qie, B.; Cheng, Q.; Li, A.; Borovilas, J.; Xu, B.; Shi, C.; Jin, T.; Liao, X.; et al. Rechargeable Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries with Vertically Aligned Ceramic Nanoparticle/Polymer Composite Electrolyte. Nano Energy 2019, 60, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zha, W.; Li, W.; Ruan, Y.; Wang, J.; Wen, Z. In Situ Fabricated Ceramic/Polymer Hybrid Electrolyte with Vertically Aligned Structure for Solid-State Lithium Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 36, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shen, H.; Yi, E.; Amores, M.; Cheng, L.; Tamura, N.; Parkinson, D.Y.; Chen, G.; Chen, K.; Doeff, M. Oriented Porous LLZO 3D Structures Obtained by Freeze Casting for Battery Applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 20861–20870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huang, C.; Leung, C.L.A.; Leung, P.; Grant, P.S. A Solid-State Battery Cathode with a Polymer Composite Electrolyte and Low Tortuosity Microstructure by Directional Freezing and Polymerization. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2002387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nie, L.; Chen, S.; Zhang, C.; Dong, L.; He, Y.; Gao, T.; Yu, J.; Liu, W. Integration of a Low-Tortuous Electrode and an in-Situ-Polymerized Electrolyte for All-Solid-State Lithium-Metal Batteries. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022, 3, 100851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lee, K.H.; Lee, Y.-W.; Lee, S.W.; Ha, J.S.; Lee, S.-S.; Son, J.G. Ice-Templated Self-Assembly of VOPO4–Graphene Nanocomposites for Vertically Porous 3D Supercapacitor Electrodes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Diem, A.M.; Bill, J.; Burghard, Z. Creasing Highly Porous V2O5 Scaffolds for High Energy Density Aluminum-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 4033–4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhu, Y.; Ju, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lutz, D.M.; Housel, L.M.; Zhou, Y.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Takeuchi, E.S.; Marschilok, A.C.; Yu, G. Evaporation-Induced Vertical Alignment Enabling Directional Ion Transport in a 2D-Nanosheet-Based Battery Electrode. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Dörr, T.S.; Fleischmann, S.; Zeiger, M.; Grobelsek, I.; de Oliveira, P.W.; Presser, V. Ordered Mesoporous Titania/Carbon Hybrid Monoliths for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes with High Areal and Volumetric Capacity. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 6358–6363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Gao, D.; Yang, J.; Zhang, D.; Chang, C. An Effective Strategy to Enhance the Electrochemical Performance of LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2: Optimizing a Li Diffusion Pathway via Magnetic Alignment of Single-Crystal Cathode Material under an Ordinary 0.4-T Magnetic Field. Ceram. Int. 2022, S0272884222024671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kim, C.; Yang, Y.; Lopez, D.H. Crystal Alignment Technology of Electrode Material for Enhancing Electrochemical Performance in Lithium Ion Battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 040502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Huang, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhu, T.; Gao, X.; Lv, X.; Ling, M.; Wan, Z.; Xia, Y. Ferromagnetic 1D-Fe3O4@C Microrods Boost Polysulfide Anchoring for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 3921–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wu, J.; Ju, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Marschilok, A.C.; Takeuchi, E.S.; Yu, G. Low-Tortuosity Thick Electrodes with Active Materials Gradient Design for Enhanced Energy Storage. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 4805–4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Billaud, J.; Bouville, F.; Magrini, T.; Villevieille, C.; Studart, A.R. Magnetically Aligned Graphite Electrodes for High-Rate Performance Li-Ion Batteries. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, L.; Erb, R.M.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Chiang, Y. Fabrication of Low-Tortuosity Ultrahigh-Area-Capacity Battery Electrodes through Magnetic Alignment of Emulsion-Based Slurries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ma, J.; Qiao, Y.; Huang, M.; Shang, H.; Zhou, H.; Li, T.; Liu, W.; Qu, M.; Zhang, H.; Peng, G. Low Tortuosity Thick Cathode Design in High Loading Lithium Sulfur Batteries Enabled by Magnetic Hollow Carbon Fibers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 542, 148664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sander, J.S.; Erb, R.M.; Li, L.; Gurijala, A.; Chiang, Y.-M. High-Performance Battery Electrodes via Magnetic Templating. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, L.; Zeng, M.; Wu, D.; Yan, X. Magnetic Field Regulating the Graphite Electrode for Excellent Lithium-Ion Batteries Performance. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 6152–6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tripathi, B.; Kumar, P.; Katiyar, R.K.; Katiyar, R.S. Aligned MWNT Channels in Free Standing Polymer Nanocomposite as an Electrode for Li-Ion Battery. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 173902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liu, L.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Lv, Q.; Hou, L.; Fautrelle, Y.; Ren, Z.; Cao, G.; Lu, X.; Li, X. Strong Magnetic-Field-Engineered Porous Template for Fabricating Hierarchical Porous Ni–Co–Zn–P Nanoplate Arrays as Battery-Type Electrodes of Advanced All-Solid-State Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 2782–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Mochizuki, D.; Tanaka, R.; Makino, S.; Ayato, Y.; Sugimoto, W. Vertically Aligned Reduced Graphite Oxide Nanosheet Film and Its Application in a High-Speed Charge/Discharge Electrochemical Capacitor. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Li, B.; Li, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, B.; Yang, S. Vertically Aligned Sulfur–Graphene Nanowalls on Substrates for Ultrafast Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3073–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xia, Y.; Mathis, T.S.; Zhao, M.-Q.; Anasori, B.; Dang, A.; Zhou, Z.; Cho, H.; Gogotsi, Y.; Yang, S. Thickness-Independent Capacitance of Vertically Aligned Liquid-Crystalline MXenes. Nature 2018, 557, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Safinya, C.R.; Sirota, E.B.; Bruinsma, R.F.; Jeppesen, C.; Plano, R.J.; Wenzel, L.J. Structure of Membrane Surfactant and Liquid Crystalline Smectic Lamellar Phases Under Flow. Science 1993, 261, 588–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bruinsma, R.F.; Safinya, C.R. Landau Theory of the Nematic–Smectic-A Phase Transition under Shear Flow. Phys. Rev. A 1991, 43, 5377–5404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bruinsma, R.; Rabin, Y. Shear-Flow Enhancement and Suppression of Fluctuations in Smectic Liquid Crystals. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 45, 994–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Gao, X.; Wang, C.; Li, W.; Holness, F.B.; Zheng, M.; Li, R.; Price, A.D.; Sun, X.; et al. Toward High Areal Energy and Power Density Electrode for Li-Ion Batteries via Optimized 3D Printing Approach. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 39794–39801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ragones, H.; Menkin, S.; Kamir, Y.; Gladkikh, A.; Mukra, T.; Kosa, G.; Golodnitsky, D. Towards Smart Free Form-Factor 3D Printable Batteries. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2018, 2, 1542–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Liu, C.; Zhao, N.; Xu, K.; Li, Y.; Mwizerwa, J.P.; Shen, J.; Chen, Z. High Performance LiFePO4 and SiO@C/Graphite Interdigitated Full Lithium-Ion Battery Fabricated via Low Temperature Direct Write 3D Printing. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 29, 101098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sun, C.; Liu, S.; Shi, X.; Lai, C.; Liang, J.; Chen, Y. 3D Printing Nanocomposite Gel-Based Thick Electrode Enabling Both High Areal Capacity and Rate Performance for Lithium-Ion Battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, F.; Wu, K.; Xu, X.; Wu, W.; Hu, X.; Yu, K.; Liang, C. 3D Printing of Graphite Electrode for Lithium-Ion Battery with High Areal Capacity. Energy Technol. 2021, 9, 2100628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hu, J.; Jiang, Y.; Cui, S.; Duan, Y.; Liu, T.; Guo, H.; Lin, L.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, J.; Amine, K.; et al. 3D-Printed Cathodes of LiMn1−xFexPO4 Nanocrystals Achieve Both Ultrahigh Rate and High Capacity for Advanced Lithium-Ion Battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Li, J.; Leu, M.C.; Panat, R.; Park, J. A Hybrid Three-Dimensionally Structured Electrode for Lithium-Ion Batteries via 3D Printing. Mater. Des. 2017, 119, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Tian, X.; Wang, T.; Ma, H.; Tang, K.; Hou, S.; Jin, H.; Cao, G. A Universal Strategy towards 3D Printable Nanomaterial Inks for Superior Cellular High-Loading Battery Electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 16086–16092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, J.; Liang, X.; Liou, F.; Park, J. Macro-/Micro-Controlled 3D Lithium-Ion Batteries via Additive Manufacturing and Electric Field Processing. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Cohen, E.; Menkin, S.; Lifshits, M.; Kamir, Y.; Gladkich, A.; Kosa, G.; Golodnitsky, D. Novel Rechargeable 3D-Microbatteries on 3D-Printed-Polymer Substrates: Feasibility Study. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 265, 690–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Liu, C.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, K.; Zhao, N.; Lao, C.; Shen, J.; Chen, Z. Novel 3D Grid Porous Li4Ti5O12 Thick Electrodes Fabricated by 3D Printing for High Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Adv. Ceram 2022, 11, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Fang, D.; Li, T. 3D-Printed Highly Deformable Electrodes for Flexible Lithium Ion Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 33, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Gupta, V.; Alam, F.; Verma, P.; Kannan, A.M.; Kumar, S. Additive Manufacturing Enabled, Microarchitected, Hierarchically Porous Polylactic-Acid/Lithium Iron Phosphate/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite Electrodes for High Performance Li-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2021, 494, 229625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cai, J.; Fan, Z.; Jin, J.; Shi, Z.; Dou, S.; Sun, J.; Liu, Z. Expediting the Electrochemical Kinetics of 3D-Printed Sulfur Cathodes for Li–S Batteries with High Rate Capability and Areal Capacity. Nano Energy 2020, 75, 104970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gao, X.; Sun, Q.; Yang, X.; Liang, J.; Koo, A.; Li, W.; Liang, J.; Wang, J.; Li, R.; Holness, F.B.; et al. Toward a Remarkable Li-S Battery via 3D Printing. Nano Energy 2019, 56, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Shen, K.; Mei, H.; Li, B.; Ding, J.; Yang, S. 3D Printing Sulfur Copolymer-Graphene Architectures for Li-S Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Gao, X.; Yang, X.; Sun, Q.; Luo, J.; Liang, J.; Li, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Li, M.; Li, R.; et al. Converting a Thick Electrode into Vertically Aligned “Thin Electrodes” by 3D-Printing for Designing Thickness Independent Li-S Cathode. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cai, J.; Jin, J.; Fan, Z.; Li, C.; Shi, Z.; Sun, J.; Liu, Z. 3D Printing of a V8C7–VO2 Bifunctional Scaffold as an Effective Polysulfide Immobilizer and Lithium Stabilizer for Li–S Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2005967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Shen, C.; Wang, T.; Xu, X.; Tian, X. 3D Printed Cellular Cathodes with Hierarchical Pores and High Mass Loading for Li–SeS2 Battery. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 349, 136331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chen, C.; Jiang, J.; He, W.; Lei, W.; Hao, Q.; Zhang, X. 3D Printed High-Loading Lithium-Sulfur Battery Toward Wearable Energy Storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1909469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Lyu, Z.; Lim, G.J.H.; Guo, R.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; He, Z.; Adams, S.; Chen, W.; Ding, J.; et al. 3D-Printed Electrodes for Lithium Metal Batteries with High Areal Capacity and High-Rate Capability. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chen, C.; Li, S.; Notten, P.H.L.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, Q.; Zhang, X.; Lei, W. 3D Printed Lithium-Metal Full Batteries Based on a High-Performance Three-Dimensional Anode Current Collector. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 24785–24794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Cao, D.; Xing, Y.; Tantratian, K.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, L.; et al. 3D Printed High-Performance Lithium Metal Microbatteries Enabled by Nanocellulose. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1807313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Gao, X.; Yang, X.; Adair, K.; Li, X.; Liang, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, R.; Sham, T.; Sun, X. 3D Vertically Aligned Li Metal Anodes with Ultrahigh Cycling Currents and Capacities of 10 mA cm−2/20 mAh cm−2 Realized by Selective Nucleation within Microchannel Walls. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gao, X.; Yang, X.; Adair, K.; Liang, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, R.; Sham, T.; Sun, X. Fast Charging All Solid-State Lithium Batteries Enabled by Rational Design of Dual Vertically-Aligned Electrodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2005357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. He, Y.; Chen, S.; Nie, L.; Sun, Z.; Wu, X.; Liu, W. Stereolithography Three-Dimensional Printing Solid Polymer Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 7136–7143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Ji, D.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, W.; Ding, J. 3D Printed High-Performance Sodium Ion and Zinc Ion Full Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 900, 163394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Katsuyama, Y.; Kudo, A.; Kobayashi, H.; Han, J.; Chen, M.; Honma, I.; Kaner, R.B. A 3D-Printed, Freestanding Carbon Lattice for Sodium Ion Batteries. Small 2022, 18, 2202277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Fan, Z.; Wei, C.; Yu, L.; Xia, Z.; Cai, J.; Tian, Z.; Zou, G.; Dou, S.X.; Sun, J. 3D Printing of Porous Nitrogen-Doped Ti3C2 MXene Scaffolds for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Hybrid Capacitors. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Lin, X.; Wang, J.; Gao, X.; Wang, S.; Sun, Q.; Luo, J.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, C.; et al. 3D Printing of Free-Standing “O2 Breathable” Air Electrodes for High-Capacity and Long-Life Na–O2 Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 3018–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kong, D.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhang, B.; Lim, Y.V.; Sim, G.J.; Valdivia y Alvarado, P.; Ge, Q.; Yang, H.Y. 3D Printed Compressible Quasi-Solid-State Nickel–Iron Battery. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 9675–9686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ma, H.; Tian, X.; Wang, T.; Tang, K.; Liu, Z.; Hou, S.; Jin, H.; Cao, G. Tailoring Pore Structures of 3D Printed Cellular High-Loading Cathodes for Advanced Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Batteries. Small 2021, 17, 2100746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhang, G.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Duan, H. 3D-Printed Multi-Channel Metal Lattices Enabling Localized Electric-Field Redistribution for Dendrite-Free Aqueous Zn Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhang, J.; Li, X.L.; Fan, S.; Huang, S.; Yan, D.; Liu, L.; Valdivia y Alvarado, P.; Yang, H.Y. 3D-Printed Functional Electrodes towards Zn-Air Batteries. Mater. Today Energy 2020, 16, 100407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sun, K.; Wei, T.-S.; Ahn, B.Y.; Seo, J.Y.; Dillon, S.J.; Lewis, J.A. 3D Printing of Interdigitated Li-Ion Microbattery Architectures. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4539–4543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Pikul, J.H.; Gang Zhang, H.; Cho, J.; Braun, P.V.; King, W.P. High-Power Lithium Ion Microbatteries from Interdigitated Three-Dimensional Bicontinuous Nanoporous Electrodes. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Liu, N.; Gao, Y. Recent Progress in Micro-Supercapacitors with In-Plane Interdigital Electrode Architecture. Small 2017, 13, 1701989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhang, C.J.; Kremer, M.P.; Seral-Ascaso, A.; Park, S.-H.; McEvoy, N.; Anasori, B.; Gogotsi, Y.; Nicolosi, V. Stamping of Flexible, Coplanar Micro-Supercapacitors Using MXene Inks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, H.; Guo, R.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Du, C.; Wang, X.; Zheng, Z. 2D Metal Patterns Transformed from 3D Printed Stamps for Flexible Zn//MnO2 in-Plane Micro-Batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Nam, K.T.; Wartena, R.; Yoo, P.J.; Liau, F.W.; Lee, Y.J.; Chiang, Y.-M.; Hammond, P.T.; Belcher, A.M. Stamped Microbattery Electrodes Based on Self-Assembled M13 Viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17227–17231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Esfahani, M.Z.; Khosravi, M. Stamp-Assisted Flexible Graphene-Based Micro-Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2020, 462, 228166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Park, M.; Cha, H.; Lee, Y.; Hong, J.; Kim, S.Y.; Cho, J. Postpatterned Electrodes for Flexible Node-Type Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1605773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Pfleging, W. A Review of Laser Electrode Processing for Development and Manufacturing of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nanophotonics 2018, 7, 549–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wu, S.; Zheng, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, N.; Cheng, W.; Fu, B.; Chen, H.; Liu, H.; Duan, H. High-Capacity, Low-Tortuosity LiFePO4-Based Composite Cathode Enabled by Self-Supporting Structure Combined with Laser Drilling Technology. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Tsuda, T.; Ando, N.; Matsubara, K.; Tanabe, T.; Itagaki, K.; Soma, N.; Nakamura, S.; Hayashi, N.; Gunji, T.; Ohsaka, T.; et al. Improvement of High-Rate Charging/Discharging Performance of a Lithium Ion Battery Composed of Laminated LiFePO4 Cathodes/Graphite Anodes Having Porous Electrode Structures Fabricated with a Pico-Second Pulsed Laser. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 291, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tsuda, T.; Ando, N.; Nakamura, S.; Ishihara, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Soma, N.; Gunji, T.; Tanabe, T.; Ohsaka, T.; Matsumoto, F. Improvement of High-Rate Discharging Performance of LiFePO4 Cathodes by Forming Micrometer-Sized through-Holed Electrode Structures with a Pico-Second Pulsed Laser. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 296, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Tsuda, T.; Ando, N.; Utaka, T.; Kojima, K.; Nakamura, S.; Hayashi, N.; Soma, N.; Gunji, T.; Tanabe, T.; Ohsaka, T.; et al. Improvement of High-Rate Performance of LiFePO4 Cathode with through-Holed LiFePO4/Activated Carbon Hybrid Electrode Structure Fabricated with a Pico-Second Pulsed Laser. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 298, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Xu, C.; Li, Q.; Wang, Q.; Kou, X.; Fang, H.-T.; Yang, L. Femtosecond Laser Drilled Micro-Hole Arrays in Thick and Dense 2D Nanomaterial Electrodes toward High Volumetric Capacity and Rate Performance. J. Power Sources 2021, 492, 229638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Park, J.; Hyeon, S.; Jeong, S.; Kim, H.-J. Performance Enhancement of Li-Ion Battery by Laser Structuring of Thick Electrode with Low Porosity. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 70, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Smyrek, P.; Pröll, J.; Seifert, H.J.; Pfleging, W. Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy of Laser-Structured Li(NiMnCo)O2 Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, A19–A26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Chen, K.-H.; Namkoong, M.J.; Goel, V.; Yang, C.; Kazemiabnavi, S.; Mortuza, S.M.; Kazyak, E.; Mazumder, J.; Thornton, K.; Sakamoto, J.; et al. Efficient Fast-Charging of Lithium-Ion Batteries Enabled by Laser-Patterned Three-Dimensional Graphite Anode Architectures. J. Power Sources 2020, 471, 228475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Kohler, R.; Proell, J.; Bruns, M.; Ulrich, S.; Seifert, H.J.; Pfleging, W. Conical Surface Structures on Model Thin-Film Electrodes and Tape-Cast Electrode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Appl. Phys. A 2013, 112, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kohler, R.; Smyrek, P.; Ulrich, S.; Bruns, M.; Trouillet, V.; Pfleging, W. Patterning and Annealing of Nanocrystalline LiCoO2 Thin Films. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2010, 12, 547–552. [Google Scholar]
  166. Kim, J.S.; Pfleging, W.; Kohler, R.; Seifert, H.J.; Kim, T.Y.; Byun, D.; Jung, H.-G.; Choi, W.; Lee, J.K. Three-Dimensional Silicon/Carbon Core–Shell Electrode as an Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 279, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Watanabe, T.; Gunji, T.; Suzuki, K.; Ando, N.; Nakamura, S.; Hayashi, N.; Soma, N.; Matsumoto, F. Application of a Holed Cathode and Anode Prepared with a Picosecond Pulsed Laser for Lithium Ion Batteries (1)~ Performance of Holed Cathodes with Solid-State Electrolytes. ECS Trans. 2020, 97, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Yoo, J.; Byun, S.; Lee, C.-W.; Yoo, C.-Y.; Yu, J. Precisely Geometry Controlled Microsupercapacitors for Ultrahigh Areal Capacitance, Volumetric Capacitance, and Energy Density. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 3979–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Daugherty, M.C.; Hsieh, C.-T.; Aaron, D.S.; Ashraf Gandomi, Y.; Li, J.; Zheng, Y.; Pfleging, W. Enabling High Rate Capability, Low Internal Resistance, and Excellent Cyclability for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries Utilizing Ultrafast Laser-Structured Graphite Felt. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 344, 136171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mayrhuber, I.; Dennison, C.R.; Kalra, V.; Kumbur, E.C. Laser-Perforated Carbon Paper Electrodes for Improved Mass-Transport in High Power Density Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 260, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Watanabe, T.; Tsuda, T.; Ando, N.; Nakamura, S.; Hayashi, N.; Soma, N.; Gunji, T.; Ohsaka, T.; Matsumoto, F. An Improved Pre-Lithiation of Graphite Anodes Using through-Holed Cathode and Anode Electrodes in a Laminated Lithium Ion Battery. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 324, 134848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Abe, H.; Yoneda, M.; Fujiwara, N. Developments of Plasma Etching Technology for Fabricating Semiconductor Devices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 47, 1435–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Zhuang, D.; Edgar, J.H. Wet Etching of GaN, AlN, and SiC: A Review. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2005, 48, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kanarik, K.J.; Lill, T.; Hudson, E.A.; Sriraman, S.; Tan, S.; Marks, J.; Vahedi, V.; Gottscho, R.A. Overview of Atomic Layer Etching in the Semiconductor Industry. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2015, 33, 020802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wu, B.; Kumar, A.; Pamarthy, S. High Aspect Ratio Silicon Etch: A Review. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 051101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Yue, C.; Yu, Y.; Yin, J.; Wong, T.; Zang, Y.; Li, J.; Kang, J. Fabrication of 3D Hexagonal Bottle-like Si–SnO2 Core–Shell Nanorod Arrays as Anode Material in on Chip Micro-Lithium-Ion-Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 7896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Choi, S.; Kim, T.-H.; Lee, J.-I.; Kim, J.; Song, H.-K.; Park, S. General Approach for High-Power Li-Ion Batteries: Multiscale Lithographic Patterning of Electrodes. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 3483–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Ashby, D.S.; Choi, C.S.; Edwards, M.A.; Talin, A.A.; White, H.S.; Dunn, B.S. High-Performance Solid-State Lithium-Ion Battery with Mixed 2D and 3D Electrodes. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 8402–8409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Mills, E.; Cannarella, J.; Zhang, Q.; Bhadra, S.; Arnold, C.B.; Chou, S.Y. Silicon Nanopillar Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Nanoimprint Lithography with Flexible Molds. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Processing Meas. Phenom. 2014, 32, 06FG10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Pearse, A.; Schmitt, T.; Sahadeo, E.; Stewart, D.M.; Kozen, A.; Gerasopoulos, K.; Talin, A.A.; Lee, S.B.; Rubloff, G.W.; Gregorczyk, K.E. Three-Dimensional Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries Fabricated by Conformal Vapor-Phase Chemistry. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4286–4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Refino, A.D.; Yulianto, N.; Syamsu, I.; Nugroho, A.P.; Hawari, N.H.; Syring, A.; Kartini, E.; Iskandar, F.; Voss, T.; Sumboja, A.; et al. Versatilely Tuned Vertical Silicon Nanowire Arrays by Cryogenic Reactive Ion Etching as a Lithium-Ion Battery Anode. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Maeng, J.; Kim, Y.-J.; Meng, C.; Irazoqui, P.P. Three-Dimensional Microcavity Array Electrodes for High-Capacitance All-Solid-State Flexible Microsupercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 13458–13465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Abbas, S.; Lee, H.; Hwang, J.; Mehmood, A.; Shin, H.-J.; Mehboob, S.; Lee, J.-Y.; Ha, H.Y. A Novel Approach for Forming Carbon Nanorods on the Surface of Carbon Felt Electrode by Catalytic Etching for High-Performance Vanadium Redox Flow Battery. Carbon 2018, 128, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Chen, H.; Shen, Z.; Pan, Z.; Kou, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Gu, Q.; Guan, C.; Wang, J. Hierarchical Micro-Nano Sheet Arrays of Nickel–Cobalt Double Hydroxides for High-Rate Ni–Zn Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1802002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Chen, C.; Dong, Y.; Li, S.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, L.; Yuan, H. Rapid Synthesis of Three-Dimensional Network Structure CuO as Binder-Free Anode for High-Rate Sodium Ion Battery. J. Power Sources 2016, 320, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Sun, H.; Mei, L.; Liang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Lee, C.; Fei, H.; Ding, M.; Lau, J.; Li, M.; Wang, C.; et al. Three-Dimensional Holey-Graphene/Niobia Composite Architectures for Ultrahigh-Rate Energy Storage. Science 2017, 356, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Shi, B.; Shang, Y.; Pei, Y.; Pei, S.; Wang, L.; Heider, D.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Zheng, C.; Yang, B.; Yarlagadda, S.; et al. Low Tortuous, Highly Conductive, and High-Areal-Capacity Battery Electrodes Enabled by Through-Thickness Aligned Carbon Fiber Framework. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 5504–5512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Huang, Z.; Deng, Z.; Shen, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, W.; Xie, M.; Li, Y.; Huang, Y. A Li–O2 Battery Cathode with Vertical Mass/Charge Transfer Pathways. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 3000–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Liang, Z.; Yan, K.; Zhou, G.; Pei, A.; Zhao, J.; Sun, Y.; Xie, J.; Li, Y.; Shi, F.; Liu, Y.; et al. Composite Lithium Electrode with Mesoscale Skeleton via Simple Mechanical Deformation. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Xu, C.; Kou, X.; Liu, D.; Fang, H.-T. Vertically Aligned Architecture in the Dense and Thick TiO2-Graphene Nanosheet Electrode towards High Volumetric and Areal Capacities. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 370, 137770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic drawing illustrating lithium-ion diffusion in (a) the high-tortuous electrode and (b) the low-tortuous electrode. (c) Sketch of the length (L′) of a tortuous path in a porous electrode with a certain thickness (L).
Figure 1. Schematic drawing illustrating lithium-ion diffusion in (a) the high-tortuous electrode and (b) the low-tortuous electrode. (c) Sketch of the length (L′) of a tortuous path in a porous electrode with a certain thickness (L).
Micromachines 13 01534 g001
Figure 2. AAO-directed low-tortuous Si nanomesh electrode. Reproduced with permission from ref. [32]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Figure 2. AAO-directed low-tortuous Si nanomesh electrode. Reproduced with permission from ref. [32]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Micromachines 13 01534 g002
Figure 3. (a) Wood-derived aligned template structure for solid-state electrolytes. Reproduced with permission from ref. [33]. Copyright 2019, ACS Publications. (b) SEM images of carbonized wood slabs. Reproduced with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH. (c) Crab shell porous structures. Reproduced with permission from ref. [46]. Copyright 2013, ACS Publications. (d) Butterfly wing-derived carbon framework for supercapacitors and Na-ion batteries. Reproduced with permission from ref. [44]. Copyright 2021, Springer.
Figure 3. (a) Wood-derived aligned template structure for solid-state electrolytes. Reproduced with permission from ref. [33]. Copyright 2019, ACS Publications. (b) SEM images of carbonized wood slabs. Reproduced with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH. (c) Crab shell porous structures. Reproduced with permission from ref. [46]. Copyright 2013, ACS Publications. (d) Butterfly wing-derived carbon framework for supercapacitors and Na-ion batteries. Reproduced with permission from ref. [44]. Copyright 2021, Springer.
Micromachines 13 01534 g003
Figure 4. (a) A bilayer LFP electrode fabricated by the templated phase inversion method. Reproduced with permission from ref. [54]. Copyright 2021, ACS Publications. (b) LLTO solid electrolyte with vertically aligned microchannels made by the templated phase inversion method. Reproduced with permission from ref. [57]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 4. (a) A bilayer LFP electrode fabricated by the templated phase inversion method. Reproduced with permission from ref. [54]. Copyright 2021, ACS Publications. (b) LLTO solid electrolyte with vertically aligned microchannels made by the templated phase inversion method. Reproduced with permission from ref. [57]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Micromachines 13 01534 g004
Figure 5. (a) Vertically aligned carbon aerogels synthesized by freeze drying. (b) The ultralight aligned cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)/polyethylene oxide (PEO) aerogels. (c) SEM images of cross-sectional and top view (inset) of the CNC/PEO aerogels. (d) Longitudinal view and (e) top view of the vertically aligned carbon aerogels. Reproduced with permission from ref. [61]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 5. (a) Vertically aligned carbon aerogels synthesized by freeze drying. (b) The ultralight aligned cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)/polyethylene oxide (PEO) aerogels. (c) SEM images of cross-sectional and top view (inset) of the CNC/PEO aerogels. (d) Longitudinal view and (e) top view of the vertically aligned carbon aerogels. Reproduced with permission from ref. [61]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH.
Micromachines 13 01534 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of the (a) conventional electrode and (b) VANS electrode with vertical alignment. (c) The evaporation-induced method of making vertically aligned electrodes. Reproduced with permission from ref. [94]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 6. Comparison of the (a) conventional electrode and (b) VANS electrode with vertical alignment. (c) The evaporation-induced method of making vertically aligned electrodes. Reproduced with permission from ref. [94]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH.
Micromachines 13 01534 g006
Figure 7. (a) Magnetic-field-assisted low-tortuous electrode structure using magnetized nylon rods and (b) magnetized nylon rods in water before and after applying the magnetic field (scale bar, 500 µm). (c) Magnetic-field-assisted low-tortuous electrode structure using magnetic emulsion droplets and (d) magnetic emulsion droplets before and after applying the magnetic field (scale bar, 75 µm). Reproduced with permission from ref. [103]. Copyright 2016, Springer Nature.
Figure 7. (a) Magnetic-field-assisted low-tortuous electrode structure using magnetized nylon rods and (b) magnetized nylon rods in water before and after applying the magnetic field (scale bar, 500 µm). (c) Magnetic-field-assisted low-tortuous electrode structure using magnetic emulsion droplets and (d) magnetic emulsion droplets before and after applying the magnetic field (scale bar, 75 µm). Reproduced with permission from ref. [103]. Copyright 2016, Springer Nature.
Micromachines 13 01534 g007
Figure 8. Vertically aligned film fabricated by electrophoresis and freeze drying for electrochemical capacitors. Reproduced with permission from ref. [107]. Copyright 2019, ACS Publications.
Figure 8. Vertically aligned film fabricated by electrophoresis and freeze drying for electrochemical capacitors. Reproduced with permission from ref. [107]. Copyright 2019, ACS Publications.
Micromachines 13 01534 g008
Figure 9. (a) Ion pathways in horizontally and vertically aligned MXene films. (b) The laminated structure of the MXene and surfactant with the hydrophilic (in red) and hydrophobic part (in green). (c) The shear-force-assisted vertically aligned MXene-based lamellar structure. Reproduced with permission from ref. [109]. Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.
Figure 9. (a) Ion pathways in horizontally and vertically aligned MXene films. (b) The laminated structure of the MXene and surfactant with the hydrophilic (in red) and hydrophobic part (in green). (c) The shear-force-assisted vertically aligned MXene-based lamellar structure. Reproduced with permission from ref. [109]. Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.
Micromachines 13 01534 g009
Figure 10. (a) Fabrication procedures of 3D-printed LFP electrodes. (b) Images of 3D-printed LFP electrodes with various patterns (scale bars: 7 mm). (c) Three types of patterns for 3D-printed electrodes. (d) Microstructure images of 3D-printed electrodes with grid, ring, and line structures. Reproduced with permission from ref. [113]. Copyright 2018, ACS Publications.
Figure 10. (a) Fabrication procedures of 3D-printed LFP electrodes. (b) Images of 3D-printed LFP electrodes with various patterns (scale bars: 7 mm). (c) Three types of patterns for 3D-printed electrodes. (d) Microstructure images of 3D-printed electrodes with grid, ring, and line structures. Reproduced with permission from ref. [113]. Copyright 2018, ACS Publications.
Micromachines 13 01534 g010
Figure 11. (a) Stamps manufactured by 3D printing. (b) Electrode inks of MXene for stamping. (c) Various electrode patterns made by stamping. (d) Micro-supercapacitors fabricated by stamping. Reproduced with permission from ref. [150]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH. 180° peel test for (e) nonpatterned and (f) post-patterned electrodes. Reproduced with permission from ref. [154]. Copyright 2017, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 11. (a) Stamps manufactured by 3D printing. (b) Electrode inks of MXene for stamping. (c) Various electrode patterns made by stamping. (d) Micro-supercapacitors fabricated by stamping. Reproduced with permission from ref. [150]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH. 180° peel test for (e) nonpatterned and (f) post-patterned electrodes. Reproduced with permission from ref. [154]. Copyright 2017, Wiley-VCH.
Micromachines 13 01534 g011
Figure 12. 3D reconstruction images and SEM images of (ac) CM-LFP (LFP cathode with CNFs and MWCNTs), (df) Laser-CM-LFP (laser-drilled CM-LFP cathode), and (gi) Con-LFP (conventional LFP cathode). (j) Li-ion flux distribution, and (k) current distribution with laser-drilled holes in the electrode. Reproduced with permission from ref. [156]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Figure 12. 3D reconstruction images and SEM images of (ac) CM-LFP (LFP cathode with CNFs and MWCNTs), (df) Laser-CM-LFP (laser-drilled CM-LFP cathode), and (gi) Con-LFP (conventional LFP cathode). (j) Li-ion flux distribution, and (k) current distribution with laser-drilled holes in the electrode. Reproduced with permission from ref. [156]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Micromachines 13 01534 g012
Figure 13. Different fabrication procedures of the vertical silicon (Si) nanowire array electrode using (a) photoresist, (b) chromium (Cr), and (c) silicon dioxide (SiO2) as patterning masks along with photolithography and multiple processing techniques. (d) The circular patterns made by photoresist, Cr, and SiO2 masks. (e) ICP/RIE process to etch silicon for the low-tortuous array structure. (f) SEM image of the vertical Si nanowire arrays. Reproduced with permission from ref. [181]. Copyright 2021, Springer Nature.
Figure 13. Different fabrication procedures of the vertical silicon (Si) nanowire array electrode using (a) photoresist, (b) chromium (Cr), and (c) silicon dioxide (SiO2) as patterning masks along with photolithography and multiple processing techniques. (d) The circular patterns made by photoresist, Cr, and SiO2 masks. (e) ICP/RIE process to etch silicon for the low-tortuous array structure. (f) SEM image of the vertical Si nanowire arrays. Reproduced with permission from ref. [181]. Copyright 2021, Springer Nature.
Micromachines 13 01534 g013
Figure 14. (a) Fabrication process of the FAT electrode. (b) Design concept of the FAT electrode. Reproduced with permission from ref. [187]. Copyright 2020, ACS Publications.
Figure 14. (a) Fabrication process of the FAT electrode. (b) Design concept of the FAT electrode. Reproduced with permission from ref. [187]. Copyright 2020, ACS Publications.
Micromachines 13 01534 g014
Figure 15. The mainstream processes of low-tortuous electrode manufacturing.
Figure 15. The mainstream processes of low-tortuous electrode manufacturing.
Micromachines 13 01534 g015
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, C.-Y.; Su, Y.-S. Smart Manufacturing Processes of Low-Tortuous Structures for High-Rate Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091534

AMA Style

Kang C-Y, Su Y-S. Smart Manufacturing Processes of Low-Tortuous Structures for High-Rate Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices. Micromachines. 2022; 13(9):1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091534

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Chun-Yang, and Yu-Sheng Su. 2022. "Smart Manufacturing Processes of Low-Tortuous Structures for High-Rate Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices" Micromachines 13, no. 9: 1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091534

APA Style

Kang, C. -Y., & Su, Y. -S. (2022). Smart Manufacturing Processes of Low-Tortuous Structures for High-Rate Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices. Micromachines, 13(9), 1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091534

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop