Next Article in Journal
Carbon Nanotube-Based Printed All-Organic Microelectrode Arrays for Neural Stimulation and Recording
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial for the Special Issue on Soft Actuators: Design, Fabrication and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling and Reliability Analysis of MEMS Gyroscope Rotor Parameters under Vibrational Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simultaneous Measurement of Local Pulse Wave Velocities in Radial Arteries Using a Soft Sensor Based on the Fiber Bragg Grating Technique
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/mi15050649
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Broadening Bandwidth in a Semi-Active Vibration Absorption System Utilizing Stacked Polyvinyl Chloride Gel Actuators

by
Zhuoyuan Li
1,2,
Chen Liu
3,
Meiping Sheng
4,
Minqing Wang
4,
Hualing Chen
1,2,
Bo Li
1,* and
Peng Xia
5,*
1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
3
Centre for Advanced Robotics (ARQ), Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
4
School of Marine Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
5
Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2024, 15(5), 649; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050649
Submission received: 11 April 2024 / Revised: 10 May 2024 / Accepted: 13 May 2024 / Published: 14 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soft Actuators: Design, Fabrication and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plasticized polyvinyl chloride (PVC) gel is a new soft and smart material, whose potential in electroactive variable stiffness can be used for vibration control in soft robotic systems. In this paper, a new semi-active vibration absorber is developed by stacking PVC gel actuator units. The absorption bandwidth of a single PVC gel absorber covers the range of three natural frequencies (76.5 Hz, 95 Hz, 124 Hz) of a rectangular steel plate in vibration attenuation. The maximum reduction percentage in acceleration amplitude is 63%. With stacked PVC gel actuator units, the absorption bandwidth can be shifted and obviously broadened.

1. Introduction

The research on smart material-based actuators has flourished in recent years, among which PVC gel is one of the most promising, owing to characteristics of softness, large deformation, lightness, variable stiffness, long lifecycle, and low power consumption [1]. In existing research, PVC gel actuators have been applied to many fields, such as wearable medical devices [2,3,4,5], adaptive micro-lenses [6], and polymer brakes [7,8]. In addition, there are a number of studies on the static properties of synthesis [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], fabrication technology [16,17], material modification [14,16], actuation structure modularization [18], and modeling [19,20,21]. All these studies have validated that PVC gel is a new type of smart material with great application prospects.
A century ago [22], a dynamic vibration absorber (DVA) was proposed as an effective element in vibration control [23,24,25,26]. However, traditional DVA generally worked in a relatively narrow frequency range, which limited its application and lowered its stability. To solve the problem, researchers have devoted themselves to developing the functions of wide absorption bandwidth and tunable natural frequency in the next generation of DVA. For instance, different kinds of absorbers based on magnetorheological elastomers (MRs) [27,28,29,30,31,32,33], shape memory alloys (SMAs) [24,34], piezoelectrics (PZTs) [35,36,37], and other mechanical structures [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46] all have relatively wide absorption bandwidths and the ability of shift frequency. Although the new generation of DVAs demonstrates advantages over the original, more effort could be contributed to further improvement.
In this study, a novel absorber is fabricated by stacking PVC gel actuators. As demonstrated in the frequency response curves of the absorber, the reduction in amplitude between its two natural frequencies is barely visible. This feature allows the absorber to work both at and between the two frequencies, broadening the absorption bandwidth of the absorber. One PVC gel absorber can attenuate the vibration of a steel plate at three natural frequencies, simultaneously. In addition, PVC gel’s ability of variable stiffness gives the absorber a frequency-shifting function. The natural frequencies of PVC gel absorber can be regulated by DC voltage when units of PVC gel are stacked. These results indicate that the PVC gel absorber offers the potential for applications of semi-active vibration control. A method of absorber selection is designed for a vibration absorption system based on a PVC gel absorber. This method can guide us to fabricate and combine appropriate PVC gel absorbers during the establishment of an absorption system.

2. Fabrication and Mechanism of PVC Gel Actuator

2.1. Composition and Fabrication of PVC Gels

The main composition of PVC gels is PVC and dibutyl adipate (DBA) plasticizer. DBA is a typical plasticizer. During the process of preparation (see Figure 1), the commercial PVC powder is first mixed in the DBA with a certain weight ratio. Then, the mixture is dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF) solvent by thoroughly stirring for 4 h. Thirdly, the solution is cast in Petri dishes. The thickness is adjusted through solution amount adjustment. Finally, we obtain the PVC gel membranes after the evaporation of the THF at room temperature two days later [7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
The weight ratio of PVC to DBA affects the performance of the PVC gel [11,12]. The stiffness of PVC gel increases while the weight ratio of DBA decreases. In this paper, the PVC gel in the actuator has a weight ratio of PVC to DBA of 1:4 [11,12]. The thickness of PVC gel can be regulated by adjusting the height of the solution in Petri dishes. In addition, the thickness is set at 0.4 mm here.

2.2. Deformation Mechanism of PVC Gel Actuator

A single-layer PVC gel actuator is a sandwich structure that consists of an anode, gel, and a cathode. The fabricated PVC gel membrane is soft, light, and highly transparent. The anode is made from a stainless mesh (0.2 mm thick). The cathode is a copper foil (0.02 mm thick). The gel is 35 mm in length, 35 mm in width, and 0.4 mm thick.
PVC gel responds to an applied electric field by deformation. As sketched in Figure 2, when a DC field is applied, the PVC gel creeps up the anode and moves into the holes in the mesh [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. As a result, the material shrinks in the thickness direction. The elasticity of the gel makes it return to its original shape upon removal of the DC field.

2.3. Structure of a Stacked PVC gel Actuator

To increase the deformation in the thickness direction, the actuator is stacked up. Figure 2c presents a photograph of the stacked PVC gel actuator unit, which has 11 layers of PVC gel membranes. In this paper, four stacked actuator units are chosen randomly as the testing samples. Table 1 shows the parameters of the four samples. The weight of one stacked unit is only 8.8 g.

3. Mechanical and Actuating Characterization of the Stacked PVC Gel Actuator

In this section, we measured the deformation and dynamic properties of actuators in the thickness direction under DC voltage. Three stacked PVC gel actuator units are randomly chosen from a batch of actuator units, which are fabricated at the same time with the same parameters.

3.1. Deformation Measurement

The illustration of test equipment is shown in Figure 3a. In the measurement, the DC voltage was applied first to make the stacked unit reach its new stiffness under this condition. A DC voltage signal is generated by a computer (NI-PXIe 8840, National Instrument, Austin, TX, USA) and sent via a DAQ card (NI-PXIe-6363). The stacked unit shrinks in thickness direction under the high DC voltage amplified by the Trek 610E. Then, a mechanical load is put on the top surface of the unit. The displacement of the top surface in the thickness direction is measured using a laser displacement sensor (LK-G150, Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
It can be observed in Figure 3b that the deformation in the thickness direction is increased with the voltage. Under 800 V DC voltage, the shrinkage of one unit is 1.08 mm, which means the contraction rate of the PVC gel actuator is 12%. The deformation of four stacked units is almost the same.

3.2. The Vertical Stiffness of the Stacked PVC Gel Actuator Units

As shown in Figure 2, the voltage-induced force compresses the stacked unit to become a closely packed structure. We measure the stiffness of the unit to find the dependency of the stiffness on the applied DC voltage.
The DC voltage was applied first to make the actuator reach its new stiffness under this condition, and then, a 100 g mass (F = 0.98 N) is placed on a black plastic sheet that is fixed on the top surface of the PVC gel unit. The displacement ( Δ z ) of the plastic sheet under different DC voltages is measured using a laser displacement sensor (Keyence LK-G150) (see Figure 4a). The vertical stiffness (k) is calculated using Equation (1), and the result is displayed in Figure 4b. The stiffness of the unit is positively correlated with the increase in DC voltage.
k = F Δ z

3.3. The Damping Ratio Test of the Stacked PVC Gel Actuator Units

In this section, we measure the damping ratio of the stacked PVC gel actuator unit to find the dependency of the damping ratio on the applied DC voltage. The schematic diagram of the measure is shown in Figure 5a. A set of step voltage signals are separately applied to the unit (see Figure 5b). The unit vibrates under a step signal, and the amplitude decreases gradually under the damping effect. The damping ratio ζ of the unit is obtained by measuring the logarithmic attenuation rate of the amplitude. The rapid attenuation of amplitude in Figure 5c indicates that the material has large damping. We performed the same measurements five times at each voltage and finally calculated the damping ratio ζ of the stacked PVC gel actuator unit. The damping ratio ζ is calculated using Equation (2). Ai in the equation represents the maximum amplitude in each vibration period. As shown in Figure 5d, the increase in the damping ratio is highly correlated with the increase in the voltage. The damping ratio ζ shows nonlinear characteristics with the increase in the voltage when the voltage is high.
ζ = 1 2 π ⋅ ln A i A i + 1

3.4. Dynamic Response of the PVC Gel Absorber

In this section, the PVC gel absorber consists of a mass block on the top of stacked PVC gel actuator units. Four kinds of absorbers (A1, A2, A3, A4, see Figure 6), which contain different numbers of stacked PVC gel units, were measured separately in this section. The acceleration frequency response under different DC voltages is investigated in this section. Figure 6b exhibits the schematic diagram of test equipment. The PVC gel absorber is placed on the plate, which is fixed on a shaker. The DC voltage signal is generated by a computer (NI-PXIe 8840) and transmitted to the higher voltage amplifier (Trek 610E) throw DAQ card (NI-PXIe-6363). After applying DC voltage, a sweep frequency signal is transmitted from the NI-PXIe 8840 to the shaker to excite the absorber. We record the acceleration of the mass in the vertical direction by the DAQ card.

3.4.1. Characterization of Wide Absorption Bandwidth

Figure 7 plots the acceleration frequency response of absorber A1 under 200 VDC. The sweep frequency signal ranges from 0.1 Hz to 200 Hz, and the sweep time lasts 500 s. The results show that the structure has more natural frequencies, such as 39 Hz, 97 Hz, and 117 Hz. Due to the damping effect of the unit, the reduction in amplitude between the two frequencies is barely visible. This feature indicates that the PVC gel absorber can work both at and between the two natural frequencies, broadening its absorption bandwidth.
The results of other DC voltages demonstrate the same feature. When the DC voltage is 400 V (see Figure 8), the two natural frequencies are 47 Hz and 137 Hz, and the amplitude in this interval [47 Hz, 137 Hz] remains unchanged.
To validate the authenticity of the results that the vibration amplitude in the interval is almost equal to that at the two endpoints, we measure it under a set of different single frequencies under 400 V. From 10 Hz to 200 Hz, the amplitude is measured every 5 Hz, and each frequency is recorded three times. The result in Figure 8b proves the increase in amplitude in the interval.

3.4.2. Alterable Absorption Bandwidth

Subsequently, the sweep frequency vibration response of absorber A1 under different DC voltages is measured in sequence. As sketched in Figure 9, the two natural frequencies vary with DC voltage. The increase in DC voltage brings the same variation to the values of two frequencies.
With the increase in the voltage, the red bar in Figure 10 floats upward and becomes longer. We regard the frequency range between the two natural frequencies as the absorption bandwidth of absorber A1. The results in Figure 10 demonstrate that the bandwidth of the absorber is alterable. The width of the bandwidth correlates positively with the DC voltage. Noticeably, there is an obvious variation in the second natural frequency. It is tuned from 70 Hz to 142 Hz by increasing the VDC.

3.4.3. The Influence of Unit Numbers in the Stacked PVC Gel Actuators

The further study is the relationship between unit number and vibration absorption bandwidth. The results are shown in Figure 10. With the increase in the unit number, the value of two endpoints under the same VDC both decline, and the absorption bandwidth becomes narrow. In other words, the two natural frequencies of the absorber decrease with the increase in the unit number. This feature of the stacked structure has been studied and reported in previous work [11]. It means that fewer PVC gel units are involved in the absorber, and the higher vibration absorption frequency will be achieved.

3.4.4. Selection of PVC Gel Absorber

According to Figure 10, we propose a selection method for PVC gel absorbers during the establishment of the vibration absorption system. When the target frequency range is determined, the method can guide us to select the number of absorbers in the system and the number of PVC gel units in each absorber, as well as the DC voltage applied to each one.
For instance, we choose a structure whose natural frequency is concentrated in the range of 60–100 Hz. As is described in Figure 11, the light blue area is the target frequency range (INVLTarget). The red bars plot the absorption bandwidth of the absorber A1 (INVLA1) under different voltages. When the DC voltage is 0, 100 V, the absorption bandwidth (first two red bars) cannot cover the entire target frequency range. This means that the absorber has no effect at certain frequencies. As for 200–500 VDC, the vibration of the target structure can be dampened by absorber A1 because the absorption bandwidth can totally cover the target frequency range. The design scheme of the absorption system is proposed in Table 2. Similarly, Figure 12 and Table 3 tell us that the absorber A2 can restrain the structure’s vibration when the DC voltage is 400–500 V.
When the target frequency range of the structure is too wide to be covered by one absorber’s absorption bandwidth, the method can instruct us how to establish a vibration absorption system by choosing two or more absorbers. Here, we choose the target frequency range of 35 Hz to 124 Hz (this frequency interval is the target frequency range in Section 4). The absorption bandwidth of absorbers A1, A2, A3, and A4 cannot cover the target frequency range alone. Hence, the absorption bandwidth of A1 and A2 under different DC voltages is chosen to form a set of new absorption intervals (see Table 4). Every interval is a union of the absorption bandwidth of A1 and A2 under different DC voltages.

4. Application of PVC Gels Absorber in Semi-Active Vibration Control

In this section, we established an absorption system guided by the absorber selection method in Section 3.3. The experiment results demonstrate that the chosen absorber can greatly restrain the first four natural frequency resonances of a rectangular thin steel plate with a free boundary. The reliability of the method is verified in experiments.

4.1. A vibrating Plate as a Platform

Because the structure of the steel plate is the most elemental mechanical structure, it is chosen as the object of vibration damping in this paper. The schematic diagram of the measurement is shown in Figure 13a. A stainless steel frame supports the structure. The plate is horizontally lifted from the frame. Free boundary conditions are realized by connecting the frame and the four corners of the plate with elastic cords and nylon wires, which undergo negligible tension. The parameters of the steel plate are 3 mm thick, 600 mm long, and 400 mm wide.
The first four normal modes of the plate are extracted from the modal analysis via ANSYS WORKBENCH (Figure 13b). The frequency response of the plate is measured and shown in Figure 13c. The first four natural frequencies are 35 Hz, 76.5 Hz, 95 Hz, and 124 Hz.
The first four normal modes of the structure are chosen as representatives of the low-frequency response of the plate and, therefore, as targets of semi-active vibration control.

4.2. Semi-Active Vibration Control Strategy

Figure 13d shows the first four mode nodal lines of the plate and the positions of the excitation, absorbers, and acceleration sensor. The exciter is hung by elastic cords. The excitation point is set at point E. This point is not positioned on any nodal line of the first four modes of the plate. The position of the absorber (A1, A2) and acceleration sensor (point S) also avoid the nodal line of the lowest modes of the plate. Please note that no absorber is needed at point A2, except in the final experiment.

4.3. Results and Discussion

In Section 3.3, Figure 11 shows the absorption bandwidth of absorber A1. The bandwidth is presented in Table 5. By comparing the data, we find that the natural frequencies of modes II, III, and IV fall in the interval when the voltage is 300 VDC to 500 VDC. Additionally, the first natural frequency only appears in the interval when the DC voltage is 0 V.
The experiment results are shown in Figure 14. When the DC voltage is 0 V, the interval is [27 Hz, 70 Hz], and only the first natural frequency of the plate is within the interval. The corresponding vibration absorption effect at 35 Hz (mode I) is shown in Figure 14a. The reduction percentage in the amplitude of the first mode is approximately 50%.
Subsequently, the second, third, and fourth mode frequencies of the plate fall within the corresponding frequency intervals, as the DC voltage increases from 300 V to 500 V. The absorption effect at the three frequencies is that the amplitude is reduced by 46% to 63% (see Figure 14b–d). What is noticeable is that one PVC gel absorber can weaken the vibration of a plate at three natural frequencies, simultaneously.
To dampen the first four natural frequencies at the same time, the method of absorber selection in Section 3.3 tells us that a second absorber must be introduced to the vibration absorption system. We have two choices, at least. The first one is an absorber with two PVC gel units under 0–100 VDC; the other one is an absorber with one PVC gel unit under 0 VDC. The two ways are both verified in experiments. We only show the first one here.
At first, the absorption performance of the absorber with two PVC gel units is measured on the plate. The absorber is positioned at point A2, but no absorber is placed at point A1. When 100 VDC is applied to A2, the vibration amplitude of the steel plate at the first natural frequency (35 Hz) is reduced by 57.4% (see Figure 14e).
Then, the two absorbers are both positioned on the steel plate. In the experiment, the absorber with one PVC gel unit under 500 VDC is placed at point A1, and the absorber with two PVC gel units under 100 VDC is placed at A2. Figure 14f describes that the vibration amplitude of the plate is attenuated by about 50% to 63.1% at the first four frequencies.
This new absorber favors a broadened and tunable bandwidth thanks to its adjustable natural frequency and the negligible reduction of the amplitude between two natural frequencies. Because the stacked PVC gel actuator has variable stiffness and a variable damping ratio, the absorber benefits from these two features. The maximum absorption effect is that the amplitude at 124 Hz is reduced by 63% at 124 Hz.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a novel absorber is designed by stacking PVC gel actuator units. The frequency response curves of the absorber demonstrate that it has a relatively wide absorption bandwidth. The vibration absorption experiments of a steel plate exhibit that one PVC gel absorber has an absorption effect on the vibration of three natural frequencies (76.5 Hz, 95 Hz, 124 Hz) concurrently. The max percentage of amplitude reduction is 63%. In addition, the PVC gel’s feature of variable stiffness gives the PVC gel absorber the capability of shift frequency. The absorption bandwidth of the PVC gel absorber can be regulated using DC voltage and the number of PVC gel units. The second natural frequency of the absorber with one PVC gel unit can be enhanced from 70 Hz to 142 Hz. Finally, we propose a method to establish a vibration absorption system. This method guides us to determine the number of absorbers and design each absorber with the proper parameters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C.; Methodology, C.L., M.S. and M.W.; Validation, P.X.; Investigation, Z.L.; Supervision, B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 91648110).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kinji, A.; Hidernori, O. Soft Actuators; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 169–183. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, Y.; Maeda, Y.; Hashimoto, M. Lightweight, Soft Variable Stiffness Gel Spats for Walking Assistance. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2015, 12, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, Y.; Hashimoto, M. Design and prototyping of a novel lightweight walking assist wear using PVC gel soft actuators. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 239, 26–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Y.; Hashimoto, M. PVC Gel Soft Actuator-Based Wearable Assist Wear for Hip Joint Support during Walking. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 125003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bae, J.W.; Shin, E.J.; Jeong, J.; Choi, D.S.; Lee, J.E.; Nam, B.U.; Lin, L.; Kim, S.-Y. High-Performance PVC Gel for Adaptive Micro-Lenses with Variable Focal Length. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shibagaki, M.; Matsuki, T.; Hashimoto, M. Application of a contraction type PVC gel actuator to brakes. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Xi’an, China, 4–7 August 2010. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ali, M.; Hirai, T. Characteristics of the creep-induced bending deformation of a PVC gel actuator by an electric field. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 7681–7688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheng, X. Understanding the electro-stimulated deformation of PVC gel by in situ Raman spectroscopy. Polym. Test. 2017, 65, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hashimoto, M. Development of an Artificial Muscle Using PVC Gel. In Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Denver, CO, USA, 11–17 November 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, Y. Influence of the number of stacked layers on the performance of PVC gel actuators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Besacon, France, 8–11 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Z. Stacked dielectric elastomer actuator (SDEA): Casting process, modeling and active vibration isolation. Smart Mater. Struct. 2018, 27, 075023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ogawa, N. Characteristics evaluation of PVC gel actuators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, MO, USA, 10–15 October 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yamano, M. A contraction type soft actuator using poly vinyl chloride gel. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Bangkok, Thailand, 22–25 February 2009. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirai, T.; Hong, X.; Hirai, K. The effects of adding ionic liquids to plasticized PVC gel actuators. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Xi’an, China, 4–7 August 2010; pp. 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, Y.; Hashimoto, M. Low-voltage planar PVC gel actuator with high performances. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 282C, 482–489. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tokoro, H.; Hashimoto, M. Characteristics of a non-woven PVC gel actuator. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Besacon, France, 8–11 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, Z. 3D Printing of Electrically Responsive PVC Gel Actuators. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 24164–24172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Hashimoto, M. PVC Gel based Artificial Muscles: Characterizations and Actuation Modular Constructions. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 233, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ali, M.; Hirai, T. Relationship between electrode polarization and electrical actuation of dielectric PVC gel actuators. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kinji, A.; Minoru, H. Electrical Properties and Electromechanical Modeling of Plasticized PVC Gel Actuators. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 1246–1256. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shibagaki, M.; Ogawa, N.; Hashimoto, M. Modeling of a contraction type PVC gel actuator. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Tianjin, China, 14–18 December 2010. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hermann, F. Device for Damping Vibrations of Bodies. U.S. Patent US0989958, 18 April 1911. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bekdas, G.; Nigdeli, S.M. Mass ratio factor for optimum tuned mass damper strategies. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2013, 71, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brennan, M.J. Some Recent Developments in Adaptive Tuned Vibration Absorbers/Neutralisers. Shock Vib. 2006, 13, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rubio, L. Optimization of passive vibration absorbers to reduce chatter in boring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2013, 41, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sarkar, S.; Chakraborty, A. Development of semi-active vibration control strategy for horizontal axis wind turbine tower using multiple magneto-rheological tuned liquid column dampers. J. Sound Vib. 2019, 457, 15–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Albanese, A.M.; Cunefare, K.A. Properties of a magnetorheological semi-active vibration absorber. In Proceedings of the Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Damping and Isolation, San Diego, CA, USA, 2–6 March 2003; pp. 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  28. Deng, H.X.; Gong, X.L. Application of magnetorheological elastomer to vibration absorber. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2008, 13, 1938–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, P. Design of the frequency tuning scheme for a semi-active vibration absorber. Mech. Mach. Theory 2019, 140, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hyun, K.K.; Hye, S.K. Stiffness control of magnetorheological gels for adaptive tunable vibration absorber. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 015016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, X. Development of a Semi-Active Electromagnetic Vibration Absorber and Its Experimental Study. J. Vib. Acoust. 2013, 135, 510151–510159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, S. An adaptive tuned vibration absorber based on multilayered mr elastomers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24, 045045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Weber, F. Semi-active vibration absorber based on real-time controlled MR damper. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2014, 46, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mane, P.U.; Kondekar, G.R. Experimental study on vibration control using shape memory alloy based vibration absorber. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 2812–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bein, T. Smart interfaces and semi-active vibration absorber for noise reduction in vehicle structures. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2008, 12, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Casagrande, D.; Gardonio, P.; Zilletti, M. Smart panel with time-varying shunted piezoelectric patch absorbers for broadband vibration control. J. Sound Vib. 2015, 400, 288–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jalili, N.; Iv, D.W.K. Structural vibration control using an active resonator absorber: Modeling and control implementation. Smart Mater. Struct. 2004, 13, 998–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Benacchio, S. Design of a Magnetic Vibration Absorber with Tunable Stiffnesses. Nonlinear Dyn. 2016, 85, 893–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bonello, P.; Brennan, M.J.; Elliott, S.J. Vibration control using an adaptive tuned vibration absorber with a variable curvature stiffness element. Smart Mater. Struct. 2005, 14, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ji, H. A Vibration Absorber Based on Two-dimensional Acoustic Black Holes. J. Sound Vib. 2021, 500, 116024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Su, T.S. Efficient Vibration Control with a Semi-Active Vibration Absorber in a Semiconductor Fab. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 564, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sven, H.; Dirk, M. Adaptive Piezoelectric Absorber for Active Vibration Control. Actuators 2016, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xi, W.; Yang, B.; Hu, Y. Optimal Design and Experimental Study of a Multidynamic Vibration Absorber for Multifrequency Excitation. J. Vib. Acoust. 2017, 139, 031011.1–031011.7. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, X. Coarse-fine adaptive tuned vibration absorber with high frequency resolution. J. Sound Vib. 2016, 383, 46–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X. Nonlinear convergence active vibration absorber for single and multiple frequency vibration control. J. Sound Vib. 2017, 411, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, X.; Yang, B. Transient vibration control using nonlinear convergence active vibration absorber for impulse excitation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 117, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Micromachines 15 00649 g001
Figure 1. Preparation of PVC gel membrane.
Figure 1. Preparation of PVC gel membrane.
Micromachines 15 00649 g001
Micromachines 15 00649 g002
Figure 2. The principle of single-layer PVC gel actuator and the stacked actuator unit.
Figure 2. The principle of single-layer PVC gel actuator and the stacked actuator unit.
Micromachines 15 00649 g002
Micromachines 15 00649 g003
Figure 3. Deformation measurement. (a) Illustration of the equipment. (b) Contraction rate of one stacked PVC gel unit.
Figure 3. Deformation measurement. (a) Illustration of the equipment. (b) Contraction rate of one stacked PVC gel unit.
Micromachines 15 00649 g003
Micromachines 15 00649 g004
Figure 4. Vertical stiffness measurement. (a) Schematic diagram of stiffness equipment. (b) Vertical stiffness of stacked PVC gel unit.
Figure 4. Vertical stiffness measurement. (a) Schematic diagram of stiffness equipment. (b) Vertical stiffness of stacked PVC gel unit.
Micromachines 15 00649 g004
Micromachines 15 00649 g005
Figure 5. Damping ratio measurement. (a) Schematic diagram of damping ratio equipment. (b) Step voltage applied to stacked PVC gel unit. (c) Step response of stacked PVC gel unit. (d) Damping ratio of stacked PVC gel unit.
Figure 5. Damping ratio measurement. (a) Schematic diagram of damping ratio equipment. (b) Step voltage applied to stacked PVC gel unit. (c) Step response of stacked PVC gel unit. (d) Damping ratio of stacked PVC gel unit.
Micromachines 15 00649 g005
Micromachines 15 00649 g006
Figure 6. Dynamic response measurement of the PVC gel absorber. (a) Diagram of the four absorbers. (b) Schematic diagram of the frequency response test equipment.
Figure 6. Dynamic response measurement of the PVC gel absorber. (a) Diagram of the four absorbers. (b) Schematic diagram of the frequency response test equipment.
Micromachines 15 00649 g006
Micromachines 15 00649 g007
Figure 7. Frequency response of absorber A1 under 200 VDC: time domain (gray area), frequency domain (blue curve).
Figure 7. Frequency response of absorber A1 under 200 VDC: time domain (gray area), frequency domain (blue curve).
Micromachines 15 00649 g007
Micromachines 15 00649 g008aMicromachines 15 00649 g008b
Figure 8. Frequency response of absorber A1 under DC voltage 400 V. (a) Frequency response of absorber A1 under 400 VDC: time domain (gray area), frequency domain (blue curve). (b) Single-frequency test under 400 V.
Figure 8. Frequency response of absorber A1 under DC voltage 400 V. (a) Frequency response of absorber A1 under 400 VDC: time domain (gray area), frequency domain (blue curve). (b) Single-frequency test under 400 V.
Micromachines 15 00649 g008aMicromachines 15 00649 g008b
Micromachines 15 00649 g009
Figure 9. Frequency response of absorber A1 under different DC voltages.
Figure 9. Frequency response of absorber A1 under different DC voltages.
Micromachines 15 00649 g009
Micromachines 15 00649 g010
Figure 10. Comparison of vibration absorption bandwidths (absorbers with different numbers of stacked PVC gel actuator units are tested under different VDC).
Figure 10. Comparison of vibration absorption bandwidths (absorbers with different numbers of stacked PVC gel actuator units are tested under different VDC).
Micromachines 15 00649 g010
Micromachines 15 00649 g011
Figure 11. Comparison of target frequency and absorption bandwidth of absorber A1.
Figure 11. Comparison of target frequency and absorption bandwidth of absorber A1.
Micromachines 15 00649 g011
Micromachines 15 00649 g012
Figure 12. Comparison of target frequency and absorption bandwidth of absorber A2.
Figure 12. Comparison of target frequency and absorption bandwidth of absorber A2.
Micromachines 15 00649 g012
Micromachines 15 00649 g013
Figure 13. Steel plate in the experiment. (a) Schematic diagram of the plate with free boundary condition. (b) First four natural modes of the plate. (c) Vibration spectrum diagram of the plate. (d) Diagram of the components’ position in the semi-active vibration control system.
Figure 13. Steel plate in the experiment. (a) Schematic diagram of the plate with free boundary condition. (b) First four natural modes of the plate. (c) Vibration spectrum diagram of the plate. (d) Diagram of the components’ position in the semi-active vibration control system.
Micromachines 15 00649 g013
Micromachines 15 00649 g014
Figure 14. Vibration absorption of the plate. Performance of the absorber, which has one stacked PVC gel unit under (a) 0 VDC; (b) 300 VDC; (c) 400 VDC; and (d) 500 VDC. During these experiments, the absorber is placed at point A1. (e) Performance of the absorber, which has two stacked PVC gel units under 100 VDC. During this experiment, the absorber is placed at point A2. (f) Absorption effect when two absorbers are both placed on the plate.
Figure 14. Vibration absorption of the plate. Performance of the absorber, which has one stacked PVC gel unit under (a) 0 VDC; (b) 300 VDC; (c) 400 VDC; and (d) 500 VDC. During these experiments, the absorber is placed at point A1. (e) Performance of the absorber, which has two stacked PVC gel units under 100 VDC. During this experiment, the absorber is placed at point A2. (f) Absorption effect when two absorbers are both placed on the plate.
Micromachines 15 00649 g014
Table 1. Compositions and conditions of one stacked PVC gel unit.
Table 1. Compositions and conditions of one stacked PVC gel unit.
PVC Gel MembraneAnodeCathode
MaterialPVC:DBA = 1:4Stainless mesh (#60)Copper foil
Size35 × 35 × 0.4 mm32 × 32 × 0.2 mm32 × 32 × 0.02 mm
Number1799
Unit’s height9.2 mmUnit’s weight8.8 g
Table 2. Design scheme of absorption system based on absorber A1.
Table 2. Design scheme of absorption system based on absorber A1.
Target Frequency Range (INVLTarget)DC VoltageAbsorption Bandwidth of Absorber A1 (INVLA1)INVLA1 Covers INVLTarget or Not?
(60 Hz, 100 Hz)0 V(27 Hz, 70 Hz)No
100 V(37 Hz, 90 Hz)No
200 V(39 Hz, 117 Hz)Yes
300 V(43 Hz, 130 Hz)Yes
400 V(47 Hz, 137 Hz)Yes
500 V(51 Hz, 142 Hz)Yes
Table 3. Design scheme of absorption system based on absorber A2.
Table 3. Design scheme of absorption system based on absorber A2.
Target Frequency Range (INVLTarget)DC VoltageAbsorption Bandwidth of Absorber A2 (INVLA2)INVLA2 Covers INVLTarget or Not?
(60 Hz, 100 Hz)0 V(22 Hz, 59 Hz)No
100 V(26 Hz, 67 Hz)No
200 V(33 Hz, 80 Hz)No
300 V(38 Hz, 95 Hz)No
400 V(43 Hz, 110 Hz)Yes
500 V(48 Hz, 118 Hz)Yes
Table 4. Union of the absorption interval of A1 and A2 under different DC voltages.
Table 4. Union of the absorption interval of A1 and A2 under different DC voltages.
DC Voltage Applied to A1/V
0100200300400500
DC voltage applied to A2/V500(27, 118)(37, 118)(39, 118)(43, 130)(48, 137)(48, 142)
400(27, 110)(37, 110)(39, 117)(43, 130)(43, 137)(43, 142)
300(27, 95)(37, 95)(38, 117)(38, 130)(38, 137)(38, 142)
200(27, 80)(33, 90)(33, 117)(33, 130)(33, 137)(33, 142)
100(26, 70)(26, 90)(26, 117)(26, 130)(26, 137)(26, 142)
0(22, 70)(22, 90)(22, 117)(22, 130)(22, 137)(22, 142)
Micromachines 15 00649 i001 The interval which can cover the target frequency range (35–124 Hz)
Table 5. Absorption bandwidth of absorber A1.
Table 5. Absorption bandwidth of absorber A1.
VDC (V)Absorption Bandwidth (Hz)Natural Frequency of the Plate (Hz)
027–7035 (I)76.5 (II)95 (III)124 (IV)
10037–90
20039–117
30043–130
40047–137
50051–142
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Sheng, M.; Wang, M.; Chen, H.; Li, B.; Xia, P. Broadening Bandwidth in a Semi-Active Vibration Absorption System Utilizing Stacked Polyvinyl Chloride Gel Actuators. Micromachines 2024, 15, 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050649

AMA Style

Li Z, Liu C, Sheng M, Wang M, Chen H, Li B, Xia P. Broadening Bandwidth in a Semi-Active Vibration Absorption System Utilizing Stacked Polyvinyl Chloride Gel Actuators. Micromachines. 2024; 15(5):649. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050649

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhuoyuan, Chen Liu, Meiping Sheng, Minqing Wang, Hualing Chen, Bo Li, and Peng Xia. 2024. "Broadening Bandwidth in a Semi-Active Vibration Absorption System Utilizing Stacked Polyvinyl Chloride Gel Actuators" Micromachines 15, no. 5: 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050649

APA Style

Li, Z., Liu, C., Sheng, M., Wang, M., Chen, H., Li, B., & Xia, P. (2024). Broadening Bandwidth in a Semi-Active Vibration Absorption System Utilizing Stacked Polyvinyl Chloride Gel Actuators. Micromachines, 15(5), 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050649

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop