1. Introduction
Thyroid carcinoma is the most common endocrine malignancy, with an estimated 43,700 new cases and 2120 deaths occurring due to the disease in the USA in 2023 [
1]. The incidence of thyroid cancer has increased more than three-fold over the past three decades [
2]. Furthermore, the incidence of thyroid cancer in women remains about 3–4-fold that in men, with a delayed peak incidence of about 1–2 decades seen in men [
1,
3].
Most primary thyroid tumors originate from thyroid follicular cells and develop into epithelial tumors. These cancers develop three main pathological types of carcinoma: papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC), and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) [
4,
5]. PTC constitutes 85–90% of all thyroid cancer cases; it is categorized as a differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and shows indolent tumor growth. FTC is also characterized as a DTC, and accounts for 5–10% of thyroid cancer cases. ATC comprises less than 2% of thyroid cancers, but it is completely undifferentiated, aggressive, difficult to manage, and typically arises in the older population, compared to PTC or FTC [
6]. The management of these various types of tumor depends on the age of the patients, the tumor size, extra thyroidal invasion, distant metastasis, vascular invasion, and the tumor variant [
6,
7].
Studies into the molecular pathogenesis of thyroid cancer have revealed that the disease is initiated by genetic alterations and epigenetic perturbations in driver oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Mutations in BRAF, rat sarcoma (RAS), and PTEN genes, and translocations in RET (rearranged during transfection)/PTC and paired box 8 (PAX8)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARG) are commonly seen to drive tumorigenesis in the thyroid [
8,
9,
10]. Other genes that are altered in thyroid cancers include TP53, IDH1, CTNNB1, and NDUFA13. TP53 encodes the tumor suppressor p53, and its perturbation is observed in 80% of ATC cases [
11]. ATC has river mutations similar to PTC, such as BRAF, but also contains additional alterations, including TERT, TP53, NRAS, CDK4, APC, MED12, ERBB2, DIVER1, AR1D1A, and MEN1 [
12]. Furthermore, the genomic profiling of ATC indicates a higher genome-wide tumor mutational burden compared to other thyroid cancer subtypes [
12].
Sex differences have been identified in the oncogenic mutational process of thyroid cancer. Pan-cancer analysis demonstrated that TERT promoter mutations were observed in 64% of male and only 11% of female papillary thyroid cancer samples, and this was associated with increased overall genome-wide mutational burden [
13].
Sex bias is prevalent in thyroid disorders, with higher prevalence in women in the reproductive age group, with various factors being speculated as reasons for this phenomenon. As ATC occurs in the older population, there is no evident sex bias [
6]. However, in PTC, there is general female predominance, with incidence dependent on age, which is suggestive of a hormonal component [
14]. Some studies suggest a link between estrogen and increased inflammation and proliferation in human thyroid cancer cells [
15,
16], while another study reported increased metastasis via estrogen receptor (ER) α and β activation in thyroid cancer cells [
17]. The level of ER expression differs in normal thyroid tissue compared with tumor tissue and among different histotypes of thyroid tumors [
18]. Well-differentiated thyroid cancers are more often ER-positive and have a higher degree of ER expression compared with undifferentiated or anaplastic cancers [
19,
20].
Limited but conflicting data are available regarding the expression of androgen receptors (ARs) and their role in thyroid cells. Our lab previously demonstrated the presence of ARs both in normal and tumor thyroid tissues, with variable degrees of expression [
21]. Papillary and follicular cancer cell lines undergoing testosterone stimulation in vitro were reported to display up-regulation of ARs and proliferation [
22]. The same study group also found a varying pattern of testosterone levels and AR status in the thyroid tissues of men and women, quite possibly hinting at the gender-specific incidence of thyroid tumors [
23,
24]. Studies on DTC tissues showed that ERα positivity, ERβ negativity, and AR expression were associated with a more aggressive phenotype [
25].
There is an increasing body of data regarding the anti-proliferative effects of AR stimulation in breast, ovarian, endometrial, and prostate cancers and cell culture models, and the complex role of androgens, including the extensive capacity for crosstalk between steroid receptors [
21,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34,
35]. We have recently shown that ARs are involved in a regulatory, anti-proliferative pathway in PTC cells, halting cell cycle progression at the G1/S checkpoint [
21]. Mirochnik et al. were the first to link the anti-tumor activity of ARs with cellular senescence in vitro and in vivo in AR-transfected PC3 prostate cancer cells [
32]. Cellular senescence is described as largely stable, irreversible cell cycle arrest, usually triggered by a multitude of intrinsic and extrinsic stresses, including physical, chemical, and biological stressors [
36,
37,
38]. The role of senescence in halting proliferation and increasing tumor clearance by the immune system via the secretion of inflammatory factors has only recently been investigated, and has picked up scientific momentum, as this knowledge opens new avenues to possible senescence-associated cancer therapies [
39].
Previous work from our laboratory suggested that androgens and AR activation played an anti-proliferative and regulatory role in a cell culture model of PTC [
21]. We now describe further investigations into the mechanism of AR-driven senescence caused by persistent stimulation of the androgen receptor, and its effect on cell mobility and invasiveness, and characterize the senescence-associated secretory profile of AR-induced senescent cells.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. In-Silico Methods of Prediction of AR Expression Using TCGA and Wanderer
The web tool Wanderer allows for real time access and visualization of gene profiles obtained from the TCGA Research Network (
http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) (accessed on 15 September 2015) [
40]. Wanderer was accessed at
http://www.maplab.cat/wanderer, accessed on 15 September 2015. The data set of PTC samples and data type ‘Illumina HiSeq RNAseq’ were selected from the dropdown menu of the web tool. The gene name, AR, was then entered as the targeted query. Graphical displays of AR mRNA downregulation in PTC tumors, compared to normal tissue, were obtained.
2.2. Cell Lines and Cell Culture
The ATC thyroid cancer cell line, 8505C, was purchased from DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany). 8505C contains the BRAF V600E mutation, as well as a C:G-to-G:C transversion at the first base of p53 codon 248 and an allelic deletion of the gene [
41]. K1 (GLAG-66) was obtained from Dr. Rebecca Schweppe at the University of Colorado Cancer Center (UCCC). K1 contains the BRAF V600E mutation, the PI3K mutation (Glu542Lys), and the p53 silent mutation (Arg213Arg) [
42].
Cells 8505C and K1 were maintained in complete medium defined as RPMI 1640 (Corning Cell Gro. CAT#10-040-CV, Manassas, VA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Atlanta Biological CAT# S11150, Norcross, GA, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine (Corning Cell Gro, Manasas, VA, USA), and a penicillin (10,000 IU/mL)–streptomycin (10,000 µg/mL) mixture (Corning Cell Gro, Manasas, VA, USA) at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The cells were grown to 90% confluence in T-25 (Falcon, Cat #353108, Corning, NY, USA) or T-75 (Thermo Scientific, Cat #156499, Waltham, MA, USA) flasks, and then, passaged.
The cells were cultured by removing the medium and washing once in 2 or 4 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS without calcium or magnesium; Corning Cell Gro. CAT# 21-040-CV, Manassas, VA, USA). Then, the cells were incubated with 0.5 mL or 2 mL 0.25% trypsin (Corning Cell Gro, Manasas, VA, USA, 25-053-CI) at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 3–5 min. The cells were then disrupted from the surface by tapping the flask. The action of the trypsin was stopped by adding 2 or 4 mL complete medium to the flasks. The cells were centrifuged and resuspended in PBS. For subculturing, the cells were then plated at a dilution of 1:6. Otherwise, the cells were harvested as indicated for each experiment described below. To freeze the cells, they were stored at −80 °C in freezing medium composed of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma CAT # D5879, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 90% FBS.
We have previously described the generation of AR-transfected cell lines 84E7, K1-lentiAR, and 8505C-lentiAR [
21,
43]. Briefly, 84E7 cells were derived through the transfection of 8505C cells with pcDNA3.1 containing the androgen receptor, followed by selection and clonal isolation [
21]. K1-lentiAR and 8505C-lentiAR were generated via transfection with lentiviral constructs containing the AR, followed by population selection [
43].
2.3. Treatment Media
For all experiments, the cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium without phenol red (Corning Cell Gro, Cat#17-105-CV, Manassas, VA, USA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum unless otherwise noted, 2 mM L-glutamine, and a penicillin (10,000 IU/mL)–streptomycin (10,000 µg/mL) mixture at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For the DHT treatment medium, the final concentration of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT; Sigma CAT# A8330-1G, St. Louis, MO, USA) used was 10 nM. Since DHT was dissolved in ethanol (EtOH; Fisher Scientific #64-17-5, Waltham, MA, USA), an equal volume of EtOH was added to the control medium.
2.4. Proliferation Assay
Twenty-five thousand to thirty thousand cells were plated in 6-well plates in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS and allowed to adhere overnight. The cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS the following day, and medium was changed every 48 h. The cells were counted every 24 h from 0–8 days using the trypan blue exclusion assay. Following washing once in PBS, the cells were harvested as described above and resuspended in PBS, and trypan blue solution added (Corning, Cat #25-900-CI). The cells that did not uptake up dye were counted as viable cells, while the presence or absence of cells that did take up dye was noted. Counts were averaged and the experiment repeated 2 more times. The experiments were graphed, and growth curves were generated using Microsoft Excel. The growth curves were used to determine the growth rates for the 3 replicated experiments and averaged.
2.5. Cell Morphology Assay and Cellular Size Determination
Twenty-five thousand to thirty thousand cells were plated in 6-well plates in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS and allowed to adhere overnight. The cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS the following day and medium was changed every 48 h. The cells were visualized every 24 h from 0–8 days using a light microscope at 10×–20× to observe the morphological changes. For cellular size determination, cells were visualized at 6 days using a light microscope at 20× magnification, and 5 random measurements of the cell width and length were carried out using the length function of the Axiovision Rel 4.8 program on an Axiovert 200 M microscope (Carl Zeiss Imaging Inc., Thornwood, NY, USA).
2.6. Apoptosis Assay Using Immunofluorescent Cytology
Fifteen thousand cells were plated in 6-well plates (Falcon, Cat #353046, Corning, NY, USA) containing sterilized 22 mm × 22 mm coverslips (Fisher Scientific, Cat #12-542-B, Waltham, MA, USA) in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS, and allowed to adhere overnight at 37 °C. The cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS the following day, and the medium was changed every 48 h for 6 days. A separate set of cells were treated with 10 mg/mL cycloheximide for 1 h prior to the assay. They were then removed, and the cells washed with ice-cold PBS. The cells were then incubated with Annexin V-FITC and 20 µg/mL propidium iodide in 1× binding buffer, for 10 min, in the dark, at room temperature, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ApoDETECTTM Annexin V-FITC kit, Cat #: 33-1200, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). After incubation, cells were washed once with the 1× binding buffer provided, and 100 µL of 2.5 µg/mL of Hoechst 33,342 solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat #62249, Waltham, MA, USA) was added to each coverslip to stain the nuclei of live cells, for 10 min, at room temperature, in the dark. After incubation, the Hoechst stain was removed, cells washed once with the 1× binding buffer, and the coverslips were mounted on glass slides (Fisher Scientific, Cat #12-544-3) using SlowFade Diamond Antifade mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat #S36963). The coverslips were sealed at the edges using a nail polish, and images were acquired within 5 min of mounting to preserve the integrity of the live cells. Images were taken using the Axiovision Rel 4.8 program under 100× oil immersion magnification on the Axiovert 200 M microscope (Carl Zeiss Micro Imaging Inc., Thornwood, NY, USA). For images, obtained at 20× and 40× magnification, cells were scanned using a Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA), and NIS-Elements Advanced Research software was used. Quantification was performed using Fiji Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
2.7. Senescence-Associated Beta-Galactosidase (SAβG) Determination Assay
Twenty-five thousand to thirty thousand cells were plated in six 6-well plates in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS and allowed to adhere overnight. The cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 0.1–100 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS the following day, and the medium was changed every 48 h for 0–6 days. Every 24 h, one plate was stained for beta-galactosidase using the senescence β-galactosidase staining kit from Cell Signaling (Cat #9860, Danvers, MA, USA). In brief, wells were washed once with PBS, followed by the addition of 1 mL of fixative solution (2% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde) per well to fix the cells for 10–15 min at room temperature. The wells were then rinsed twice with PBS. One milliliter of beta-galactosidase staining solution (staining solution, solutions A and B, 20 mg/mL X-gal stock solution) was then added per well. The plates were then sealed with parafilm to avoid evaporation and crystallization of the staining solution. The plates were incubated at 37 °C in a dry incubator for 40 h. The staining solution was then removed from the wells, and the wells washed once with PBS. The cells were then overlaid with 70% glycerol for visualization of blue color under a light microscope at 20×, and stored at 4 °C. The number of blue-stained cells were counted from 5 random fields of view in the control and DHT treated wells, and the percentage of senescence was calculated. Bar graphs were generated using Excel to represent the percentage of senescence following various DHT exposure times.
2.8. Laser Scanning Cytometry for Cell and Nuclear Size
Five thousand to ten thousand 84E7 cells were plated overnight in 2-well chamber slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 154453, Waltham, MA, USA) in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS at 37 °C. The following day, the cells were treated with 0.1% ETOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS, at 37 °C. The cells were harvested on days 2, 5, and 7, by removing the medium, washing once with cold PBS, and adding cold 70% ethanol for 30 min to 2 h, at −20 °C. The chambers were removed from the slide and stored at −20 °C in 70% ethanol. Prior to scanning, the slides were washed once in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. Cell nuclei were stained with 1 µg/mL 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) for 15 min, and cells were washed once in PBS, followed by mounting using a SlowFade Diamond Antifade mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat #S36963, Waltham, MA, USA). Random sections of each slide were scanned, and nuclear fluorescence was measured via LSC (iCysR; CompuCyte, Westwood, MA, USA) utilizing standard filter settings; fluorescence was excited using a violet (405 nm, for DAPI) laser. The intensities of maximum pixels and integrated fluorescence were measured and recorded for each cell in the scanned sections. Enlarged nuclei had a lower DAPI maximum pixels. Histograms were obtained, and cells represented gates based on the nuclear area. The ratio of maximum pixels to nuclear area were calculated for EtOH- and DHT-treated cells and normalized and compared to the ratios of EtOH-treated cells for respective days of laser scanning.
2.9. Flow Cytometry Measurements of Total RNA Content, Protein Content, ROS, and Protein Markers of Senescence
Seventy-five thousand 84E7 cells were plated in T-75 flasks in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS and allowed to adhere overnight. The cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS the following day, and the medium was changed every 48 h. On days 1, 3, and 6, cells were harvested as described above. The cells were then resuspended in ice cold PBS for washing and pelleted again. The cells were resuspended in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS for counting, and adjusted to 106 cells/mL.
For RNA content determination, 0.4 mL acid detergent solution (0.1% Triton-X-100; 0.08 M HCl; and 0.15 M NaCl) [Fisher Scientific Cat # BP151-100, Waltham, MA, USA; Fisher Scientific Cat #A144-500, Waltham, MA, USA; Fisher Scientific Cat # 764-14-5, Waltham, MA, USA] was added to 0.2 mL of cell suspension. Fifteen seconds later, 1.2 mL of acridine orange (AO) staining solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)containing 20 µM AO, at pH 6.0, was added. Cellular fluorescence was measured using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), with excitation at 488 nm and an argon ion laser and measuring green (530 ± 20 nm) and red (>620 nm) fluorescence. Green cell fluorescence is proportional to cellular DNA content, whereas red luminescence correlates with RNA content. Histograms were obtained and gating was performed. The gating strategy was to restrict cells with higher RNA content into separate gates in each treatment type. The values for each replicate were analyzed as a ratio of DHT over EtOH values. Bar graphs were generated using the same method to exhibit changes in RNA content following various DHT exposure times.
For protein measurement, cells were resuspended in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS for counting, and adjusted to 106 cells/mL in cold 70% ethanol to fix them. We added 1% sulforhodamine B dye (SRB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to the cell suspension and allowed it to incubate for 20 min at room temperature in the dark. After incubation, the cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, and 400 µL of 1 µg/mL 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) solution was added to the cell suspension to stain the DNA. The intensity of cellular fluorescence was measured using a MoFlo XDP (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) high-speed flow cytometer/sorter. DAPI fluorescence was excited using a UV laser (355 nm), and SRB using an argon ion (488 nm) laser. Our analysis of forward light scatter via flow cytometry provides information on cell size, cell cycle, and protein content. All experiments were repeated at least three times, and the representative data are presented. The values for each replicate were analyzed as a ratio of DHT to EtOH values. Bar graphs were generated using the same method to represent changes in total protein content following various DHT exposure times.
For ROS measurements, the cells were resuspended in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS for counting, and 106 cells were incubated for 60 min with 10 µM 2′,7′-dihydrodichlorofluorescein-diacetate (H2DCF-DA; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) dye, which is a cell-permeant non-fluorescent dye, at 37 °C. This dye, upon cleavage of the acetate moiety by the intracellular esterases and oxidation by ROS and peroxides within the cells, is converted to a strongly fluorescent derivative, DCF, and thus, reveals the ROS abundance.
For protein marker flow cytometry analysis, the cells were resuspended in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS for counting, and adjusted to 106/mL. They were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Affymetrix, Cat# 19943, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 15 min on ice, washed once with ice-cold PBS, and resuspended in cold 70% ethanol for 2 h at −20 °C. Fixed cells were washed again with PBS and incubated overnight with primary antibodies diluted 1:100 in 1% BSA solution at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used were p21 (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 2947T, Danvers, MA, USA), p27 (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 3686S, Danvers, MA, USA), and p16 (Proteintech Group Inc., Cat# 10883-1-AP, Rosemont, IL, USA). Post incubation, the primary antibodies were washed off with PBS, and the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies (1:100) conjugated to Alexa-fluor 488 or 633 (Molecular Probes, Cat# A11008 and A21071, respectively, Eugene, OR, USA), in the dark, for 45 min, at room temperature. Post-incubation, the secondary antibodies were washed off with cold PBS, and 400 µL of DAPI solution was added to the cells and allowed to stain the nuclei for 10 min. The intensity of cellular fluorescence was measured using a MoFlo XDP (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) high-speed flow cytometer/sorter. DAPI fluorescence was excited using the UV laser (355 nm), and SRB using the argon ion (488 nm) laser. Our analysis of forward light scatter via flow cytometry provides information on protein expression and cell cycle. All experiments were repeated at least three times, and the representative data are presented. The values for each replicate were analyzed as a ratio of DHT to EtOH values. Bar graphs were generated using the same method to exhibit changes in senescence markers following various DHT exposure times.
2.10. Immunofluorescence Staining
Fifteen thousand cells were plated in 6-well plates containing sterilized 22 mm × 22 mm coverslips (Fisher Scientific, Cat #12-542-B, Waltham, MA, USA) in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS, and allowed to adhere overnight. The following day, the cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS, and medium was changed every 48 h. The cells were treated for 0–6 days. The medium was removed, and the cells washed twice with PBS. The cells were then fixed with ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 5–10 min, and then, washed again two times with PBS to remove the fixative. For intracellular proteins, the cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-X (FisherBiotech, Cat# BP151-100, Wembley, Australia) for 10 min at room temperature, and washed once with PBS. The cells were then blocked in 0.1% Triton-X, 10% goat serum, and 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, Cat #A-9418, Lot #77H0702, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were then incubated for two hours at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody Ars (Cell Signaling Technology (CST), Cat# 3202, Danvers, MA, USA), p21 (CST, Cat# 2947T, Danvers, MA, USA), p27 (CST, Cat# 3686S, Danvers, MA, USA), and p16 (Proteintech Group Inc., Cat# 10883-1-AP, Rosemont, IL, USA), diluted 1:100 or in accordance with manufacturer’s recommended dilution factor, in 1% BSA solution. The cells were also probed for phalloidin (CST, Cat#13054, Danvers, MA, USA), caspase-8 (Bioss Inc., Cat# bs-0052R, Woburn, MA, USA), LC3A/B (CST, Cat# 12741, Danvers, MA, USA), and Ki67 (CST, Cat# 9449, Danvers, MA, USA). The wells were then washed twice with PBS and incubated with the respective secondary antibody conjugated to either Alexa-fluor 488 or 633 (Molecular Probes, Cat# A11008 and A21071, respectively, Eugene, OR, USA), diluted 1:100 in a 1% BSA solution, for 45 min, at room temperature, in the dark. The cells were then washed once with PBS and incubated with 1 µg/mL 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) solution for 10 min, in the dark, at room temperature. The cells were washed once with PBS, and the coverslip was carefully removed from the wells and mounted on premium microscope glass slides (Fisher Scientific, Cat #22-178-277, Waltham, MA, USA) with SlowFade Diamond Antifade mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat #S36963, Waltham, MA, USA). Isotypic IgG was used as a control to define background fluorescence. Images were taken using the Axiovision Rel 4.8 program under 100× oil immersion magnification on the Axiovert 200 M microscope (Carl Zeiss Micro Imaging Inc., Thornwood, NY, USA). For images obtained with 20× and 40× magnification, cells were scanned using a Nikon Eclipse Ti fluorescence inverted microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA), and NIS-Elements Advanced Research software was used. Quantification was performed using Fiji Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
2.11. Western Blotting
84E7 cells were plated at 900,000 cells/T-25 flasks for 1 day of DHT treatment, 300,000 cells/T-75 flask for 3 days of DHT treatment, or 75,000 cells/T-75 flask for 5–6 days of DHT treatment, and were allowed to adhere to the flasks overnight in phenol-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with L-glutamine, penicillin–streptomycin, and 5% FBS. The cells were treated for 1, 3, or 5 days the following day with DHT at a final concentration of 10 nM in medium. Another set of flasks received an identical volume of EtOH as the DHT flasks, serving as a vehicle control. The cells were harvested as described above, washed twice in ice-cold PBS, and pelleted again. The cells were lysed with RIPA Buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4 [Sigma Cat# T3253 St. Louis, MO, USA] 150 mM NaCl, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate [Fisher Scientific Cat# 302-95-4, Waltham, MA, USA], 0.1% SDS [Fisher Scientific Cat# BP166-500, Waltham, MA, USA], 0.5% NP-40 [ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 85124, Waltham, MA, USA], and 1 μM Pefebloc [Sigma, Cat# 11429868001, St. Louis, MO, USA]) supplemented with protease inhibitors by incubating them on ice for 45–60 min and vortexing them every 10 min. The lysate was passed 5 times through a 23-gauge needle to shear the DNA and, centrifuged at 20,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube, and the protein concentrations were analyzed by adding Bradford Reagent (Bio-Rad, Cat #500-0006, Hercules, CA, USA) to detect protein reads at 595 nm following the Bio-Rad procedure (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Serial dilutions of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA; Sigma, Cat #A-9418, Lot #77H0702, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used for a standard curve to determine the amount of protein in the samples. A total of 5–10 μg of protein per lane was loaded in all experiments, unless otherwise noted. All SDS-PAGE analyses were performed under reducing conditions (with β-mercaptoethanol) [Sigma Cat# M6250, St. Louis, MO, USA], using 50 V to run the proteins into the stacking gel (4%) and 100 V to run them through the separating gel (10–15%). Protein was transferred from the gel to the PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billeriac, MA, USA) at 220 mA for 2 h at 4 °C. The membranes were cut and incubated in a blocking solution of 5% dry milk reconstituted in TBST (200 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20 [Fisher Scientific, Cat# BP337-500, Waltham, MA, USA]) on a shaker for 1 h at room temperature, or overnight at 4 °C (for phosphorylated proteins). The primary monoclonal antibodies used were p21 (CST, Cat# 2947T, Danvers, MA, USA), p27 (CST, Cat# 3686S, Danvers, MA, USA), and alpha tubulin (CST, Cat# 2125S, Danvers, MA, USA). The antibodies were diluted 1:1000 in 3% milk reconstituted in TBST, and incubated with the membrane on a shaker overnight at 4 °C. After incubation with primary antibodies, all membranes were washed 3 times, and then, secondary antibodies were added. All secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibodies (Abcam, Cat# 7171, Cambridge, UK) diluted to 1:5000 or 1:10,000 in 3% milk with TBST and incubated with the membrane for 2 h at room temperature or overnight, at 4 °C, on a shaker. The membranes were then washed three times with 1× TBST, followed by HRP detection, which was performed using a Super Signal Western blot kit (Pierce; Thermo Scientific, Cat# 32109, Waltham, MA, USA). An autoradiography film was exposed to blots for 2 s to 10 min. Densitometry was used to analyze the band intensity using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). All expressions were normalized to beta-tubulin expression, and fold changes were determined relative to the vehicle-treated control for all proteins, except where noted.
2.12. Conditioned Medium Generation for Inflammation Array
Seventy-five thousand 84E7 cells were plated in T-75 flasks in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS and allowed to adhere overnight at 37 °C. The cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS the following day, and the medium was changed every 48 h. The cells were treated for 6 days, and the treatment medium was replaced with EtOH/DHT medium on the 6th day, after washing the cells twice with warmed PBS. The cells were allowed to culture in treatment-free medium for 24 h for conditioned medium generation. Twenty-four hours later, the medium was removed and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min to remove any cells or debris, and was immediately aliquoted and used or stored at −20 °C.
2.13. Human Inflammation Array
The RayBiotech Human Inflammation Array Q1 kit (RayBiotech Inc., Cat #QAH-INF-1-1, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA) was used to quantify the levels of 20 inflammatory chemokines and cytokines in the conditioned medium obtained from 84E7 cells treated for 6 days with 0.1% EtOH, or 10 nM DHT, in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS. The array was performed on each sample as per the manufacturer’s instructions, with a control of conditioned medium generated from 84E7 cultured for 6 days without any treatment. In brief, the glass slide arrays were blocked with blocking solution for 30 min, and 100 μL of conditioned medium/standard cytokines was added to the wells on the slide and allowed to incubate for 2 h at room temperature. The samples were decanted, and the slides washed 5 times for 5 min in wash buffer I, and then, twice with wash buffer II with gentle rocking. This was followed by incubation with primary biotinylated antibody solution for 2 h at room temperature. Washes were repeated as described before, and the slides incubated with Cy3 equivalent dye-conjugated streptavidin antibody solution for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were washed again and dried in a centrifuge. Signals were visualized through the use of a laser scanner equipped with a Cy3 wavelength (green channel) such as Axon 4000B. Data extraction was performed using GAL files that were specific to each array, along with the microarray analysis software found on the RayBiotech website. Q-analyzer software (RayBiotech Inc., Cat #QAH-INF-1-SW, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA) was used to compute the concentrations of chemokines and cytokines in the conditioned medium.
2.14. Human MMP Array
The RayBiotech Human MMP Array Q1 kit (RayBiotech Inc., Cat #QAH-MMP-1-1, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA) was used to quantitate the levels of 7 MMPs and 3 TIMPs in the conditioned medium obtained from 84E7 cells, treated for 6 days with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS. The array was performed on each sample as per the manufacturer’s instructions, with a control of conditioned medium generated from 84E7 cultured for 6 days without any treatment. In brief, the glass slide arrays were blocked with blocking solution for 30 min, and 100 μL of conditioned medium/standard cytokines was added to the wells on the slide and allowed to incubate for 2 h at room temperature. The samples were decanted, and the slides washed 5 times for 5 min in wash buffer I, and then. twice with wash buffer II with gentle rocking. This was followed by incubation with primary biotinylated antibody solution for 2 h at room temperature. Washes were repeated as described above, and the slides incubated with Cy3 equivalent dye-conjugated streptavidin antibody solution for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were washed again and dried in a centrifuge. The signals were visualized using a laser scanner equipped with a Cy3 wavelength (green channel) such as Axon 4000B. Data extraction was performed using GAL files that were specific to each array, along with the microarray analysis software found on the RayBiotech website. Q-analyzer software (RayBiotech Inc., Cat #QAH-MMP-1-SW, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA) was used to compute the concentrations of the MMPs and TIMPs in the conditioned medium.
2.15. Transwell Migration Assay
Corning Biocoat Control Inserts (Corning, Cat #354578, Manassas, VA, USA) with 8 µm pore membrane filters were used for migration assay as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Seventy-five thousand 84E7 cells were plated in T-75 flasks in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS and allowed to adhere overnight at 37 °C. The cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS the following day, and medium was changed every 48 h. On day 6, cells were harvested as described above. The cells were then resuspended in ice-cold PBS for washing and pelleted again. The cells were resuspended in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 1% FBS for counting, and adjusted to 15,000 cells in 0.5 mL of 1% FBS medium with either 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT. These cells were added to migration chambers, which were rehydrated for 2 h at 37 °C with serum-free, phenol-free RPMI medium, and 750 µL of the growth medium containing 5% FBS was loaded into the bottom chambers. After 12 h of incubation in a humidified tissue culture incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2, the non-migrating cells were removed from the upper surface of the membrane of the chambers by gently scrubbing using a wet cotton-tipped swab. The cells on the lower surface of the membrane were then fixed in methanol (Fisher Scientific, Cat# 67-56-1, Waltham, MA, USA) for 2 min and dried. The cells were then stained in 1% toluidine blue and 1% borax solution for 3 min, followed by washing in distilled water. The inserts were then allowed to air-dry and counted at 10× magnification. The cells in five random fields were counted per chamber and averaged to determine the cells per field of view for each well.
2.16. Transwell Invasion Assay
Seventy-five thousand 84E7 cells were plated in T-75 flasks in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS and allowed to adhere overnight at 37 °C. The cells were treated with 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 5% FBS the following day, and the medium was changed every 48 h. On day 6, the cells were harvested as described above. The cells were then resuspended in ice-cold PBS for washing and pelleted again. The cells were resuspended in phenol-free RPMI supplemented with 1% FBS for counting and adjusted to 15,000 cells in 0.5 mL of 1% FBS medium, with either 0.1% EtOH or 10 nM DHT. Corning Biocoat Invasion Inserts (Corning, Cat #354480, Manassas, VA, USA) were warmed to room temperature for 30 min and used for the invasion assay as per the manufacturer’s protocol. The chambers were rehydrated in serum-free phenol-free RPMI medium at 37 °C for 2 h. The cell suspension was added to the invasion chambers, and 750 µL of the growth medium containing 5% FBS was loaded into the bottom chambers. After 12 h of incubation in a humidified tissue culture incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2, the non-invading cells were removed from the upper surface of the membrane of the chambers by gently scrubbing using a wet cotton-tipped swab. The cells on the lower surface of the membrane were then fixed in methanol for 2 min and dried. The cells were then stained in 1% toluidine blue and 1% borax solution for 3 min, followed by washing in distilled water. The inserts were then allowed to air-dry and counted at 10× magnification. The cells in five random fields were counted per chamber and averaged to determine the cells per field of view for each well. To control for the effect that increased migration has on the invasion assay, the Invasion Migration Index was used to more correctly assess the effect of DHT on invasion potential.
2.17. Statistical Analysis
The experiments presented here represent three biological replicates (unless stated otherwise). Statistical significance was determined using a paired Student’s t-test in Microsoft Excel, with a probability (‘p’ value) ≤ 0.05 leading us to reject the null hypothesis. The asterisks denoting p-values signify the following: * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.005, *** p-value < 0.0005, and **** p-value < 0.00001.
4. Discussion
Sex disparity has been previously documented in various human malignancies, including thyroid cancer [
52]. The American Cancer Society indicates that the female-to-male thyroid cancer incidence ratio is 3–4 to 1 [
1]. Despite significant advancements in the illumination of the molecular pathways underlying thyroid cancer development and progression, the influence of sex on the pathological characteristics and outcomes of PTC is largely understudied [
53,
54,
55]. Body weight, body mass index, diabetes, reproductive and menstrual status, environmental and dietary factors, and tumor sex hormone receptor expression are some of the hypotheses that have been investigated for sex differences in PTC initiation and progression; however, limited experimental evidence demonstrates the mechanism responsible for the phenomenon of sex disparity [
52]. ATC, seen in older individuals, does not have a sex disparity such as that of PTC, supporting the idea of a hormonal component of the disease [
6].
While the tumor-modulating roles of sex hormones have been extensively investigated in breast and prostate cancers [
56,
57], their roles in the regulation of gene expression and cancer pathology are now emerging in non-endocrine-related cancers, such as colorectal, liver, bladder, and head and neck cancers, and endocrine-related cancers, such as endometrial and ovarian tumors [
58,
59,
60,
61,
62,
63]. The effects of estrogen, mediated by its alpha and beta receptors, have long been found to play a proliferative role in thyroid and breast cancers [
64]. Studies of papillary thyroid tumors have suggested a dramatic increase in cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion in thyroid cancer cell lines treated with estrogen, in comparison with treatment with testosterone [
20,
65,
66].
An androgen receptor (AR) is a nuclear receptor found in the cytoplasm, and is an androgen-activated transcription factor that translocates into the nucleus upon binding to testosterone or dihydrotestosterone. It regulates gene expression programs that are particularly important for the male phenotype. Like other steroidal pathways, AR signaling does not function in isolation, but rather, in conjunction with multiple signaling pathways. The proliferative effects of androgens are well-documented in various malignancies. Karla Kohan-Ivani et al. reported that androgens may induce a direct decrease in the levels of p21 protein, driving proliferation in epithelial ovarian cancer [
67]; meanwhile, Pietri et al. present a rationale for using AR antagonists for AR-targeting treatment as a new therapy for triple-negative breast cancer, where AR signaling drives tumor progression [
68,
69].
AR modulates cellular proliferation and metastasis in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer cells, and hence, is a major drug target to manage the disease [
70]. An investigation of AR gene expression’s impact on clinical features and the progression of PTC demonstrated an association with high cancer risk and extrathyroidal extension in PTC [
71]. Although there have been some reports of the anti-proliferative effects of androgens in prostate cancer cells and mesenchymal cells [
72,
73], research into this role of ARs in other cancers has been very limited.
In our study, we present data that indicate that ARs exhibit decreased expression in PTC. Further, we describe an anti-proliferative facet of the androgen receptor in the thyroid cancer cell lines 8505C and K1, which we engineered to express a functional AR gene to render it androgen-responsive (84E7, 8505C-lentiAR, and K1-lentiAR). Prolonged activation of the receptor, achieved through the addition of 10 nM dihydrotestosterone in culture medium over a period of up to 6 days, resulted in significant reductions in the cellular numbers of all three cell lines. This effect was determined to be DHT- concentration-dependent, AR-specific, and was accompanied by a reduction in proliferation potential, as observed by the decrease in Ki67 in 84E7 cells. Autophagy and apoptosis were not the causes of decreased proliferation. 84E7 cells treated with DHT also showed a distinct cellular morphology when compared to the control (EtOH) cells. They were significantly larger, highly granular, and vacuolarized, suggesting a senescence-mediated process. Along with the loss of proliferation potential, the AR activation of all three AR-expressing cell lines induced senescent cells, which exhibited an accumulation of beta-galactosidase in the cytoplasm. Significant increases in nuclear area, RNA and protein content, and reactive oxygen species were observed in 84E7. An upregulation of senescence protein markers p16, p21, and p27 was also observed in 84E7 cells. Thus, one mechanism by which androgen/AR signaling causes senescence is prolonged cell cycle arrest, which the cells are unable to escape from. The association of the androgen/AR complex with the senescence program was first made in androgen-responsive prostate cancer cells [
32,
74] and human dermal papilla cells [
75]. However, there were few reports that demonstrated the association of AR antagonists [
76] and androgen depletion in prostate cancer [
77] with senescence. Our study is the first to demonstrate the induction of a senescence program in androgen-responsive thyroid cancer cells with prolonged activation of ARs by DHT. The possibility of the induction of AR expression and activation as a therapeutic approach may be an exciting avenue for study.
Senescence is generally accompanied by inflammatory cytokine production by the senescent cells, which signal the host immune cells to eliminate damaged cells. Upon profiling the senescent cell secretome of our cells, we found that AR-induced senescent cells secreted significantly lower levels of inflammatory cytokines than control cells, suggesting that AR-dependent senescence incurs an anti-inflammatory SASP, which reduces tumor-promoting chemokines. Conditioned medium derived from senescent cells induced paracrine senescence in naïve 84E7 cells, indicating the potential of SASPs to induce a senescent phenotype in neighboring, untreated cells. These data also suggest that AR activation in thyroid cancer cells favors a more anti-inflammatory environment, allowing us to understand why men have a lower incidence of inflammatory diseases and cancers of the thyroid gland compared to women [
1].
Inflammation is a well-established risk factor for many malignancies, and there are sex differences in thyroid inflammation that begin around puberty [
78]. Thyroid inflammation due to autoimmune disorders is more common in women, and several studies have demonstrated that women with these disorders have an increased risk of thyroid cancer [
79,
80]. With that, investigations into the role of sex hormones in inflammation and the role of AR activation have uncovered mechanisms, including the inhibition of NFKB activation, and the suppression of T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and natural killer cells, and hence, a reduction in inflammatory cytokine production [
81,
82,
83,
84].
Interestingly, migration was found to be upregulated six-fold with continuous AR activation in 84E7 cells, but no significant change in the invasion potential of these cells was observed. Our data indicate that the lack of increased invasive potential of DHT-treated cells can be attributed to a decline in the levels of MMP-3, MMP-10, and TIMP-4, while a moderate increase is observed in MMP-1, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2. The data also account for the observation of the high lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer in men, as cells with high migratory and low invasive properties can easily gain access to the lymph nodes; this is because of the presence of a discontinuous, leaky basement membrane of the lymphatic system [
85].
The concept of pro-senescence therapy has been gaining momentum recently as a novel therapeutic approach to control tumor cells. It is now becoming more evident that cellular senescence is one of the primary and most potent physiological anti-neoplastic responses initiated by the cells to counteract oncogenic drivers, and can be cleared, in vivo, via a robust innate immune response [
86]. Senescence has been shown to affect numerous pathways in various cancers, including p53, MAPK, NFKB, and mTOR, consequently inhibiting proliferation and altering inflammatory processes [
87,
88,
89]. While the AR induction of cellular senescence can be interpreted as a tumor-suppressive phenomenon, the clearance of senescent cells may be desirable, as these cells have the potential to survive indefinitely. In clinical settings, the presence of chemotherapy-induced senescent (CIS) cells is correlated with chronic inflammation, incomplete tumor clearance, and disease relapse [
51]. The selective elimination of senescent cells has become imperative and challenging, as they do not show susceptibility to non-specific genotoxic chemotherapies. Studies are now focusing on therapeutically exploiting the hypercatabolic nature of CIS with synthetic lethal metabolic targeting, or inhibiting lysosomal ATPases [
45]. It is imperative to determine if DHT-induced senescence has clinical implications in tumor treatment therapy and whether these cells could be selectively eliminated in vitro by senolytic drugs that inhibit lysosomal ATPases. There are three main strategies for the utilization of senolytic drugs, including (1) selectively killing pro-tumorigenic senescent cells, (2) promoting the secretion of beneficial SASP factors, and (3) inhibiting the secretion of pro-tumorigenic SASP factors [
88,
89]. Future directions include investigating the senolytic effects of macrolides on our AR-induced senescent cells. Senescent cells could also be targeted for senoptosis by inhibiting survival pathways and anti-apoptotic mechanisms.
Engaging immune cells and promoting their function, while also engaging pro-senescence therapy and responses, may prove to be beneficial for the clearance of senescent cells, as well as rapid reductions in tumor burden. Adoptive cell transfer therapies involving the administration of activated and expanded tumor-reactive T cells may prove to be a useful strategy to promote immune cell function in patients undergoing pro-senescence therapies. In co-culture systems and in vivo, senescent cells could be targeted for clearance by T cell targeting, NK cells, antibodies, and antibody-mediated drug delivery [
50]. Thus, a combination of immune-modulatory agents with pro-senescence agents, apoptosis inducers, and SASP modulators should be considered when evaluating pro-senescence modalities as a tool for effective cancer management. Further, we have observed that AR activation decreases the expression of PDL-1 in 84E7 and K1-lentiAR cells, rendering cells more susceptible to immune destruction by T cells [
43].
The effective and optimized use of senescence for therapy would require the sensitive detection and quantification of senescence in vivo, and the recruitment of effector immune cells to the tumor microenvironment. IHC analysis on tissue biopsy samples may be performed to detect and quantify SAβG, the upregulation of markers such as p16, p21, and p27. In vivo imaging of SaβG-positive tumors using the novel fluorescent galactosidase conjugate DDAOG (7-hydroxy-9H-(1,3-cichloro-9,9-dimethylacridin-2-one galactosidase) can be utilized [
86]. The measurement of the expression of ARs in tumor tissue and serum levels of circulating active testosterone could potentiate the development of personalized hormonal therapy for the management of thyroid cancer in patients. In clinical settings, based on AR expression status in the thyroid tumor, a pro-senescence approach could be taken in combination with traditional treatments of radioiodine ablation, TSH suppression, thyroid hormone replacement therapy, and BRAF inhibitors, in order to reduce tumor mass before lobectomy or thyroidectomy. This may be particularly useful for patients with metastatic PTC, radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer, or undifferentiated ATC. In the initial stages, the induction of AR-driven senescence in tumor cells may reduce tumor growth itself, followed by the cumulative effect of promoting cells towards apoptosis en route to senescence due to the combination of senescence therapy with radiotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic protocols.
A desirable feature of pro-senescent therapies against cancer is the possibility of a subsequent complementary treatment to completely eliminate the senescent cells [
39]. In this regard, it has been found that senescent cells sustain high levels of proteo-toxicity, and require high lysosomal activity [
45]. Senescent cells are particularly sensitive to chemical inhibitors of lysosomal ATPases, and this property serves as an Achilles heel in senescent cells [
45]. Understanding the crosstalk between senescence and regeneration will provide us with better knowledge to design effective pro-senescent or anti-senescent therapies [
45].
The current understanding of the genomic and non-genomic activities of ARs is incomplete. The lack of standardized AR measurement methods and the small number of patients tested for AR expression limits our knowledge of AR expression in various disease states. One way to detect AR activity would be to detect the expression of androgen-responsive genes, such as FKBP5 or RHOB (which we found in our in vitro model system to be responsive to AR-activation) [
21]. One could also supplement this information by detecting circulating free androgen in patients and drawing a direct correlation between the levels of active androgen and the expression of AR gene readout proteins. Several studies have documented the association between AR splice variants and prostate cancer progression, including a group that published findings of AR splice variants binding to constitutively open chromatin to promote abiraterone resistance in prostate cancer [
90]. While there is a paucity of such studies on thyroid cancer, it would be worthwhile to investigate any AR splice variant that leads the tumorigenesis of PTC and ATC.
Contributing to these limitations, there are contrasting reports documenting increased and decreased expression of ARs in thyroid cancer. Our study, and the field, would benefit from determining AR protein expression in a large cohort of PTC and ATC patients using the IHC of TC patient samples and normal, matched thyroid tissue, with stratification performed based on TNM staging, BRAFV600E mutation, and inflammation status.
It would be useful to validate the increased transcript levels of inflammatory molecules at the protein level. Further, a comparison of our data with an independent RNA/protein database of TC patients would support their potential role in the etiology of TC. Bisulfite sequencing may be performed to detect and validate the methylation of ARs in the thyroid cancer cell lines that have silenced androgen receptors. While androgen-dependent prostate cancer is managed via resection and androgen manipulation, there is a scarcity of studies on testosterone manipulation in other cancer models [
91]. The importance of senescence has been underappreciated, and the use of senescence induction for therapeutics remains underexploited. We investigated the convergence of AR signaling with senescence pathways in a thyroid cancer model. Cellular metabolism, mitochondrial function, mitophagy, and miRNA are known to be altered in senescent cells. Exploration into the modulation of crosstalk between androgen/AR complex and these signaling pathways through androgen manipulation in thyroid cancer merits future research. Furthermore, expanding this work into animal models for an in vivo validation of the anti-proliferative and pro-senescent role of ARs would provide extensive depth of knowledge on the role of this nuclear receptor. Although there is still a lot to learn from in vitro and in vivo modeling of senescence, the use of AR-targeted pro-senescence therapy with conventional cancer therapies might minimize toxicity and enhance clinical outcomes and quality of life for cancer patients.
It is tempting to speculate that the manipulation of androgens and androgen receptors may be utilized for therapeutic intervention for thyroid cancer. Further, the use of senolytic drugs, in conjunction with androgen-induced senescence, is an extension of our data. Future directions include investigating the effect of senolytic drugs on androgens/androgen receptor-induced senescent cells.