Next Article in Journal
Efficacy and Safety of Cemiplimab for the Management of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Drug Safety Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Dependent and Independent Mechanisms Underlying Chemoresistance of Hypoxic Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/cancers16091731
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phenotype Transformation of PitNETs

by
Zhenwei Li
,
Yinzi Wu
,
Guannan He
,
Renzhi Wang
and
Xinjie Bao
*
Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2024, 16(9), 1731; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091731
Submission received: 15 March 2024 / Revised: 24 April 2024 / Accepted: 26 April 2024 / Published: 29 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Research of Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors are derived from the clonal expansion of a single anterior pituitary cell and are thought to retain their secretory patterns alongside their growth. However, cases of phenotype transformation in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors have been reported continuously. These tumors represented various transformation during the course and the phenomenon is rare and unexpected. We reviewed cases with phenotype transformation and defined the phenomenon. We also determined the clinical characteristics of these cases and the treatment of them. The possible mechanisms beneath this rare biological behavior were discussed in detail. Surgeons need diagnose and predict these tumors more accurately to reserve the precious specimens.

Abstract

Phenotype transformation in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors is a little-known and unpredictable clinical phenomenon. Previous studies have not clearly defined and systematically concluded on the causes of this rare phenomenon. Additionally, the mechanisms of phenotype transformation are not well known. We reviewed cases reported in the literature with the aim of defining phenotype transformation in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. We present an overview of the wide spectrum of phenotype transformation and its clinical features. We also discuss findings on the potential mechanism of this rare transformation, which may be related to PC1/3, the bioactivity of secretory hormones, gene mutations and the plasticity of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Clinicians should be aware of this rare phenomenon and more studies on the underlying mechanisms are required.

1. Introduction

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are neoplasms that originate from neuroendocrine cells in the adenohypophysis [1]. They are the second most common intracranial tumors, accounting for 15–20% of them [1]. For most PitNETs, trans-sphenoidal surgical resection is the first-line treatment option. In the case of non-feasibility or failure of surgery because of invasive/recurrent lesions, multimodal therapy is considered, including temozolomide, dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs, other medical therapy, radiation therapy, and even palliative bilateral adrenalectomy [2,3,4]. More therapies, including immunotherapeutic strategies to affect the tumor micro-environment for instance, are also being developed [5]. The various types of PitNETs are determined by the hypersecreted hormones and clinical features of the tumors. Somatotroph tumors secrete growth hormone and cause acromegaly, lactotroph tumors secrete prolactin and induce hyperprolactinemia, thyrotroph tumors produce excess thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and lead to mild central hyperthyroidism, corticotroph tumors secrete adrenocorticotrophic hormone and cause Cushing’s disease (CD) and a small number of gonadotroph tumors secrete intact follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or luteinizing hormone (LH) and may cause sexual dysfunction and hypogonadism. Some types of PitNETs even express multiple hormones [6]. Additionally, some PitNETs, called silent PitNETs (22% to 54% in different series), express pituitary hormones or their transcription factors measured with immunohistochemistry (IHC) but without clinical symptoms [7]. The 5th Edition of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors (2022) proposes that PitNETs be classified on the basis of hormones, transcription factors and other biomarkers, as determined by IHC findings [6].
Previous studies indicate that most PitNETs are initiated by the expansion of a single cell [8] and they maintain the same secretory pattern during the whole course of disease, unlike some malignancies that exhibit heterogeneity [9]. However, some silent corticotroph tumors were observed to change to CD [10], indicating a switch between different phenotypes. The phenotype switching of PitNETs has also gradually been reported in other types of PitNETs. This phenotype transformation is relatively rare and lacks a widely agreed name and definition; furthermore, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we review PitNETs that exhibit phenotype transformation and discuss the possible mechanisms.

2. Definition

The transformation of phenotype in PitNETs is rarely reported and the definition is vague. Terms such as “transformation”, “changing phenotype”, “metamorphosis” and “modification” have been used to describe this rare biological behavior [7,11,12,13,14,15]. The diagnosis of PitNETs is based on the IHC staining of hormones and transcription factors, the pattern of secretary pituitary hormones and clinical symptoms [6]. Broadly speaking, any change in the four dimensions between two phases can be called a transformation of phenotype in PitNETs (Figure 1) [13,15,16,17].
As shown in Figure 1, we can describe the state of a PitNET using the pointers on a “clock”. With a simple clock face, we can represent the expression condition of a PitNET. The transformation is represented by the difference between the length, direction and number of pointers. The depth of color on the clock face represents the expression condition of each hormone. We used gradually deepening colors to represent progressively functional hormone expression (from totally silent to functional) [18]. In other words the length of a pointer stands for whether the hormones are silent or functional at the current stage. For example, a short pointer represents one type of silent PitNETs, a long pointer represents a functional PitNET with clinical syndromes and multiple pointers denote a PitNET that secretes multiple hormones. We have listed some types of transformations reported (models 1–4), and will discuss their possible mechanisms. Model 1 is the most common transformation type, where an SCA [IHC-ACTH(+), serum ACTH(−)] transforms to CD; model 2 represents a clinically SCA [serum ACTH(+) without CD symptoms] transformed to CD. Models 3 and 4 are both associated with the co-expression of multiple hormones. Model 3 denotes the transformation of SCA to PitNET with the co-expression of ACTH and FSH/LH measured by IHC but without clinical syndromes; model 4 means a somatotroph tumor switch to a mammosomatotroph tumor. Of note, there are many cases which cannot be classified using these models due to their wide spectrums of phenotype transformation.

3. Literature Review

We searched published case reports on PitNETs that exhibited phenotype transformation using the PubMed database. The keywords included ([PitNETs] OR [pituitary adenoma]) AND ([change] OR [transformation] OR [metamorphosis] OR [reversal]) (Figure 2). Notably, some cases may have been missed in the literature search because there is no clear term to define the transformation. We included case reports published in English describing human PitNET phenotype transformation using the keywords listed above. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) there was no clear shift in PitNET phenotype; (2) the report did not include at least one IHC staining result for evidence of the phenotype shift; (3) detailed clinical data were not described; and (4) reports were published in languages other than English. Finally, we included 27 cases from 21 articles that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

4. Clinical Characteristic

The prevalence of the rare transformation was not well-estimated due to the absence of a clear definition and large retrospective reviews. An operation series reviewed 1023 patients with PitNETs from a single center; 65 patients (6.4%) exhibited recurrence and 5 (7.7%) had tumors that changed phenotype [13]. The clinical data of the 27 included patients are summarized in Table 1 [7,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The 27 patients included 8 males and 19 females (M:F, 1:2.38). The average age at first diagnosis of PitNET was 43.5 ± 14.2 years, ranging from 17 to 77 years. The interval from the initial diagnosis of PitNETs to the transformation ranged from 1 to 20 years, with an average of 6.25 ± 4.19 years. The transformation often occurred following recurrence of the tumor after surgery. However, in three cases, phenotype switching emerged during surveillance or medicine treatment (cases 12, 15 and 24). The treatments or events before the transformation were surgery (88.9%), radiotherapy (33.3%) or pituitary apoplexies with clinical symptoms (7.4%), which might promote the transformation of PitNETs as in some malignant tumors [13].
The spectrum of the transformation of PitNET phenotype is wide. The transformation of clinical syndromes can be classified into three types: functionalization of silent PitNETs (19/26), silence of functional PitNETs (4/26) and switch between different lineages (3/26). The clinical syndromes of patient 28 were not detailed. Among the 19 patients with functionalization of silent PitNETs, 15 tumors transformed to CD (one transformed to pituitary carcinoma); this was the most common phenotype transformation. Of the five patients that initially had a functional PitNET, four cases were ACTH-secreting PitNETs that changed to NFP. Cases with different secretory hormones in two clinical phases were rare: two patients with hyperprolactinemia developed acromegaly and one patient with a silent gonadotroph tumor developed CD. Additionally, nine cases had a phase in which hormones from more than one lineage were co-expressed (model 3 in Figure 1). This phenomenon was mainly observed in PitNETs from the Pit-1 lineage (4/6, 66.6%), and this was also observed in ACTH-secreting tumors. Some studies proposed that the co-expression of other hormones may be from nontumorous cells in the lesion [28]. Data on transcription factors were only reported for case 7.
Information on the treatment and outcome of these patients is also summarized in Table 1. Among the cases with detailed follow-up data, the average follow-up was 4.80 ± 2.98 years. The treatment and outcome of these tumors varied. Multiple types of treatments, including medicine, radiotherapy and surgery, were used for tumor removal and relief of clinical symptoms. Approximately 74.1% patients (20/27) underwent at least one tumor removal surgery and 5 underwent multiple surgeries. Seven patients (25.9%) exhibited tumor recurrence after surgery after phenotype transformation, indicating these cases might be classified as refractory pituitary adenomas. Radiotherapy was considered in 14 patients, in most cases in combination with surgery. Four patients who did not undergo surgery achieved biological remission or stable even shrunk PitNETs after radiotherapy. However, in eight challenging cases, the tumors were out of control after the earlier mentioned treatment. Notably, six cases were severe CD after transformation and four received bilateral adrenalectomy to control severe CD. The PitNET of case 14 recurrent in a short term and resisted multiple treatment, including TMZ. Seven patients presented with hypoadrenalism and required pituitary hormone replacement after surgery; notably, all of the tumors were silent cortitroph adenomas (SCAs) before transformation. A high frequency of post-operative hypopituitarism (35%) in SCA was previously reported [32]. Two patients died from complications of tumor and surgeries; the cause of death was not detailed. For these patients, physicians should maintain a long-term follow-up and multiple therapies in the early stage.
Table 1. The phenotype transformation of the included patients.
Table 1. The phenotype transformation of the included patients.
Case NumberAuthors and Reference Age/Sex Events before
Transformation		Time up to
Transformation (Years)		IHC Staining before the TransformationIHC after the TransformationClinical Diagnosis before
Transformation		Clinical Diagnosis after
Transformation		Treatment after TransformationFollow-Up after Transformation (Years)Outcome and
Adverse Events
1Demarchi, 2022 [19]65/FSurgery,
apoplexy		6ACTH (+)ACTH (−)
OR (strongly +)		NFPCDSurgery, RT, TMZ, ketoconazole, cabergolin7RR, BR
2Brown, 2020 [16]56/MMultiple surgeries, apoplexies111st: FSH/LH (weakly +), 2nd: all hormones (±)3rd, 4th: ACTH (+)NFP NFPMultiple surgeries, RT2Multiple recurrences, lost to follow-up
apoplexies, hypopituitarism
3Guerrero-Pérez, 2020 [9]24/FSurgery1.5ACTH (strongly +)NACDNFPRT 4PR
477/FSurgery5GH strongly (+),
PRL focally (+)		NAAcromegalyNFPRT 3PR,
TSH deficiency
5Rotman, 2019 [22]51/MSurgery,
radiotherapy		14NAACTH (strongly +)CDSilent corticotroph pituitary carcinomaSurgery, RT, TMZ, Bevacizumab8Transformation to pituitary carcinoma, SD
6Jahan, 2019 [21]18/MSurgery3NAACTH/FSH (+)NFPCDSurgery, RT NRNR
7Andino-Ríos, 2018 [20]41/FSurgery3FSH/ LH /SF-1 (+)FSH (strongly +) LH (+)NFPExcess of FSH
Hypergonadism		SurgeryNRNR
8Zoli, 2015 [15]47/FMultiple surgeries7ACTH (10% +)ACTH (80% +)NFP CDSurgery, multiple RT, bilateral adrenalectomy7RR, BR
9 51/MMultiple surgeries1ACTH (90% +)ACTH (80% +)CDNFPMultiple surgeries11Recurrence, SD
hypoadrenalism
10Zoli, 2015 [15]18/FSurgery6ACTH (20% +)ACTH (70% +)NFPCDSurgery2RR, BR
hypocorticism
11 37/FSurgery2ACTH (90% +)ACTH (75% +)Excess ACTH
but normal serum cortisol		CD with an extremely high ACTH concentrationMultiple surgeries6Multiple recurrences, hypoadrenalism, excess of ACTH
12 48/FClinical surveillance2NAACTH (80% +)NFPCDSurgery5RR, transient hypocorticism
13Lee, 2014 [23]53/FMultiple surgeries, radiotherapy6ACTH (+)NANFPCDRT, mitotane and cabergoline0.25SD, BR
14Batisse, 2013 [33]47/Msurgery, radiotherapy9GH (5% +)GH (40% +)NFPAcromegalySurgery, cisplatin, adriblastin, TMZ3Recurrence of a giant adenoma, SD, active acromegaly, bilateral blindness
15Dessimoz, 2011 [17]32/FDopamine agonist10NAGH, PRL (strongly +)HyperprolactinemiaHyperprolactinemia
Acromegaly		Surgery1RR, BR
16Lania, 2010 [24]31/FDopamine agonist, multiple surgeries, multiple radio13PRL (+)PRL (+)
GH (10% +)		HyperprolactinemiaHyperprolactinemia
Acromegaly		Surgeries, RT, lanreotide3.5Recurrence, hyperprolactinemia,
bilateral blindness, death due to complications
17Daems, 2009 [7]41/Msurgery7GH (strongly +), PRL/TSH/α-subunit (diffused +)NANFPAcromegalyOctreotide, pegvisomant11PR, BR
18Daems, 2009 [7]40/Msurgery14α-subunit (10% +), TSH (2–3% +) α-subunit (25% +), TSH (20% +)NFP Hyperthyroid surgeryNRhypothyroid
19Brown, 2007 [25]32/FMultiple surgeries, multiple radio 10All hormones (−)ACTH (− or strongly +)NFPCorticotroph pituitary carcinomaMultiple surgeries7Recurrence, transformation to pituitary carcinoma, death
20Salgado, 2006 [26]49/FSurgery,
radiotherapy, bromocriptine		2All hormones (−)ACTH (>50% +)
PRL/GH (slightly +)		NFPCDRT, ketoconazoleNRNR
21Sano, 2002 [28]49/FMultiple surgeries1ACTH (focally +) ACTH (strongly +)NFPCDSurgery, RTNRCD was not controlled
22Kho, 2002 [27]48/FMultiple surgeries, radiotherapy21st: LH/FSH (+)
2nd: all hormones (−)		NANFPCDBilateral adrenalectomy5SD, CD was not controlled until adrenalectomy
23Tan, 2000 [11]39/FMultiple surgeries61,2: all hormones (−)ACTH/PRL/FSH/GH (+)NFPCDSurgery, RT, ketoconazole, bilateral adrenalectomy4CD was not controlled until adrenalectomy
24Gheri, 1997 [12]47/FClinical surveillance3NAACTH (+)NFP with mild hyperprolactinemiaCDSurgery, RT, ketoconazole, octreotide NRNR
25Felix, 1991 [31]19/MMultiple surgeriesNAACTH (+)2nd, 3rd, 4th: ACTH/FSH/LH/α-subunit (+)NFPNot reportedmultiple surgeries7Multiple recurrence
26Cooper, 1987 [30]60/FSurgery5NAACTH (+)NFPCDRT, aminoglutethimide and metapyrone3BR,
hypocorticism
27Vaughan,1985 [10]55/FMultiple surgeries13all cell ACTH (+)ACTH (partly +)NFPCDsurgery, chemotherapy, bilateral adrenalectomy1SD, CD was controlled until adrenalectomy
NFP: non-functional PitNETs; NA: not applicable; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone; ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone; GH: growth hormone; PRL: prolactin; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; Pit-1: pituitary specific transcription factor 1; SF-1: steroidogenic factor 1; CD: Cushing’s disease; RT: radiotherapy; NR: not reported; RR: radical removal; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; BR: biochemical remission; TMZ: temozolomide.

5. Is It Really Phenotype Transformation?

The transformation of the PitNET phenotype is a rare clinical phenomenon, especially in tumors other than SCAs. This raises the question of whether the functional PitNET after recurrence is the resected tumor. Some reports indicated that the tumor with the transformed phenotype was an independent new PitNET or a tiny and hidden double pituitary adenoma [34]. Although most transformations in PitNETs occur from residual tumors after surgery [15], some PitNETs produce these transformations just in clinical surveillance, and no double PitNETs were reported in these tumors [12,15,17]. Some tumors with a transformed phenotype were found to be monoclonal [24]. This evidence supports the existence of phenotype transformation in PitNETs, although these events are rare. In contrast, the transdifferentiation theory considers that the mixed PitNETs, also called “double pituitary adenomas,” may be derived from the phenotype transformation of one PitNET. In other words, cells of an already formed pituitary adenoma could transdifferentiate into another cell type and constitute a PitNET with different biological behaviors. However, only one of three double pituitary cases expressed the same transcription factors, indicating the two components might derive from a single PitNET lineage. Further studies are needed to support the transdifferentiation theory [34,35].
Some tumors only exhibited IHC staining change in two phases [13,16]. Some cases also showed co-expressed focal staining of multiple hormones. Therefore, these transformations may be attributed to the false positivity of IHC staining, especially in the early stage. Most of the included cases did not report transcription factor expression because of time limitations. The lack of information on transcription factor expression may also increase the risk of misdiagnosis. Therefore, the detection of transcription factors is necessary.
There is also a series of cases in which symptoms caused by functional PitNETs lead to biochemical remission after pituitary apoplexy, especially in acromegaly and CD. These biological events have been described as “spontaneous remission” or “silent reversal” of acromegaly or CD [36,37,38,39,40]. The remission is similar to the silent transformation of functional PitNETs, especially when the apoplexy lacks the typical symptoms. However, it is generally agreed that these events are attributed to the destruction of the tumor by the hemorrhagic infarction. Three possible reasons are as follows: First, while in some cases the reduction of hormones is selective for GH or ACTH, most remission is combined with hypopituitarism. Second, the pathologic finding of PitNETs after apoplexy also exhibits strongly positive IHC staining and does not correspond to the typical silent PitNET. Finally, some cases showed recurrence of acromegaly after remission. Therefore, we do not believe remission after apoplexy is equal to the silent transformation of PitNETs, unless IHC evidence is provided.

6. Potential Mechanisms of Transformation

6.1. The Transformation from SCA to Cushing’s Disease

The functionalization of SCAs is the most common transformation of PitNETs (model 1 and 2, Figure 1), accounting for more than half of this case series, and the further study on this rare behavior also focused on the transformation of SCAs. Therefore, a separate discussion of this type is necessary. As is reported, “SCA” may not mean the complete absence of secretory ACTH in serum. Higher evidence of acquired postoperative in patients with SCA was reported compared with NFPA [41]. One explanation is that the SCAs are functional and depress the ACTH secreted by normal pituitary cells [32]. This might mean the transformation process is continuous and the evidence of transformation is underestimated. Why the SCAs evolve to CD remains unclear, and three possibilities have been hypothesized.

6.1.1. PC1/3

The most attractive and persuasive theory for the mechanism of SCA is from studies on prohormone convertase 1/3 (PC1/3), one of the proopiomelanocortin (POMC) processing enzymes. PC1/3 cleaves POMC, the precursor of ACTH. The absence of PC1/3 may result in the accumulation and secretion of POMC or other ACTH precursors, which show low biological activity [42]. PC1/3 mRNA level is significantly lower in the SCAs than the CD cells and even lower than other non-functional PitNETs [43,44]. Additionally, changes in PC1/3 might explain why the SCA switches to CD. To date, only one study has focused on the transformation of SCAs [45]. In this study, PC1/3 mRNA and protein were analyzed by qRT-PCR and IHC staining in tissue specimens from both phases in three of the patients with tumor transformation from SCA to CD (model 1 in Figure 1). While PC1/3 expression was negative or weak in the three patients in the initial phase of SCA, strong expression was detected in recurrence with CD. The difference between the expression of PC1/3 in the two phases may explain the potential mechanism of the transformation. Why or how PC1/3 changed in the transformation remains unclear. One hypothesis is the transformation is from the accumulation of PC1/3 in the cells. It might be a continuous process spanning a long time before emergence of CD. The concept of “subclinical SCA” mentioned above may support this hypothesis. Holck et al. found that NFPA contains smaller secretory granules than functional tumors and suggested that with sufficient tumor bulk, any defect in packaging or exocytosis of ACTH may be overcome and thus lead to peripheral release of ACTH [46]. However, this cannot explain the transformation from CD-related PitNETs to SCAs. Alternatively, the expression of PC1/3 may be up-regulated for some reason, which is supported by the change in PC1/3 mRNA in the two phases. The mechanism of change in PC1/3 should be studied further.

6.1.2. High-Molecular-Weight ACTH

Another theory about why SCA is silent is that SCAs secrete predominantly high-molecular-weight (HMW) ACTH, which lacks bioactivity and may compete with normal ACTH (1 to 39 amino acids, ACTH 1–39) at the receptor level [47]. As described in a case report, whether HMW ACTH can be tested by the ACTH kit depends on the clinical ACTH kit and the structure of HMW ACTH [32,48,49]. HMW ACTH always results in “clinically” SCAs, which are characterized by a high level of ACTH but normal serum cortisol levels and the absence of CD symptoms (model 2 in Figure 1) [48]. Notably, both CD tumors and SCAs produce HMW ACTH, and the “clinically” SCA produces higher amounts [47]. A high amount of the biologically inactive HMW ACTH may compete with ACTH 1-39 for the ACTH receptor, therefore hiding the effect of excessive ACTH 1–39. However, the binding capacities of HMW ACTH and ACTH 1-39 have not been compared. There is only one report of functionalization in clinically SCA. In the study by Zoli et al., a patient (case 11) exhibited an excess of ACTH during the entire disease course. She did not manifest Cushing’s disease until the ACTH concentration reached 1500 pg/mL (reference range 9–52 pg/mL) when the tumor recurred [15]. This may indicate that the functionalization of clinically SCA eventually occurs when the total ACTH level is high enough. How HMW ACTH is produced in PitNETs is not completely clear. The process of conversion from POMC to ACTH 1–39 involves two steps: cleavage and maturation. PC1/3 and 2 participate in the cleavage of POMC. In ectopic ACTH–producing tumors that produce HMW ACTH, the expression of PC1/3 mRNA is much lower than levels in NFPA and CD-related PitNETs. Moreover, ectopic ACTH–producing tumors produce ACTH 1–39 after transfection of the PC1/3 gene. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate the low expression of PC1/3 results in the impaired cleavage procession [50]. However, the relationship of PC1/3 and HMW ACTH in SCA has not been quantitatively studied. In SCAs that produce HMW ACTH, PC1/3 and PC2 were IHC-positive, while chromogranin A, which functions in the maturation of secretory granules, was negative. This may indicate that a defective maturation process leads to HMM ACTH [48]. More study is required to determine the expression of PC1/3 in HWM ACTH-secreted PitNETs and CD-related PitNETs.

6.1.3. Multiple Hormone Tumors?

The co-expression of other hormones with ACTH in SCA is rare because the tumor is derived from the T-PIT lineage [31]. Notably, in some cases of functionalization in SCA, multiple hormones in the cells were observed (case 5, 12 and 14). Although Tan et al. proposed that these hormones were expressed by normal pituitary cells wrapped in the tumors [11,13,21,51], the tumors should have been diagnosed as multiple hormone tumors in these cases. The hypothesis about these PitNETs will be presented later.

6.2. The Plasticity of Multiple Hormone Tumors

Most PitNETs are derived from clonal expansion of a single anterior pituitary cell and they retain their secretory pattern alongside their growth, which was demonstrated by an X chromosome inactivation study [52]. However, this theory was challenged for a long time. The plasticity of the normal pituitary has been demonstrated by multiple studies. For example, studies have reported a variable decrease in pituitary GH concentrations in the second half of pregnancy, and somatotrophs are recruited to switch from GH to PRL production [53,54]. Additionally, PitNETs originate from and are classified from the various cell types. Therefore, some studies explored the plasticity of PitNETs. Xu et al. obtained pituitary adenoma stem-like cells from two pituitary adenomas (one a GH-secreting tumor, the other a NFPT). These cells formed neurospheres in vitro and generated daughter cells, which showed the capacity to differentiate into three neural lineages under the induction of GHRH, GnRH, PRL-releasing peptide and TRH. The studies proved the plasticity of PitNETs in vitro and may shed light on the transformation of these tumors [55,56,57].
Similar findings were also observed in vivo. Kovacs et al. described a case of acromegaly in which three groups of cells were observed: one secreted GH, another secreted ACTH and the third group secreted both. Immunoelectron microscopy conclusively demonstrated ACTH in the secretory granules of several somatotrophs. The authors speculated the GH-secreting cells transformed into neoplastic ACTH-secreting cells [29].
In the cases of transformation of PitNET phenotype, the proportion of tumors co-expressing other hormones (model 3 and 4 in Figure 1) is unusually high, especially in the Pit-1 lineages (4/6 cases) [7,9,13]. In the studies, the tumors were diagnosed as monohormonal tumors and co-expression was dismissed. From these findings, one hypothesis is possible: these tumors should have been diagnosed as plurihormonal tumors, which are rarely diagnosed and partly or completely silent [6,35]. Some plurihormonal tumors show variable positivity for one or more hormones [58]. Under these conditions, the clinical symptoms, which are often undetectable, can be diverse. For example, the immature PIT1-lineage tumor, previously known as silent subtype 3 adenoma, expresses no hormone or one/multiple pituitary hormones, and approximately 29% of these tumors can exhibit significant hormonal excess [13,59]. Another example is the silent corticogonadotroph adenoma proposed by Cooper et al., which might account for a proportion of SCA; these tumors originate from the common progenitor cell of corticotroph and gonadotroph pituitary cells [60]. These so-called SCA can co-express SF-1 and LH, like in case 2. Additionally, diagnosis of these tumors depends on transcription factor staining and electron microscopy, which can result in misdiagnosis. These immature plurihormonal tumors lack the features of terminally differentiated mature cell phenotypes [61]. They may be more primitive than monohormonal tumors [62]. It can be speculated these multiple hormone tumors are more plastic than terminally differentiated PitNETs and retain the capacity to differentiate or even reverse differentiate into PitNETs of other lineages. For example, cases 15 and 16 may essentially be mammosomatotroph tumors or acidophil stem cell tumors that co-express GH and PRL and these are considered immature in Pit-1 lineage tumors; the two clinical phases are different secretory pattern of these tumors. Future studies could explore this issue by focusing on the biological behavior of plurihormonal tumors. The clinical application of transcription factor staining and electron microscopy may help identify plurihormonal tumors.

6.3. Gene Mutation

Lania et al. found a mutation in the GNAS gene (present in approximately 40% of GH tumors) in the tissue of a patient (case 16) after the PRL-secreting PitNETs secreted GH and caused acromegaly (model 4 in Figure 1) that was absent in the previous surgical specimen. The authors also proved the monoclonality of the tumor through X-inactivation analysis, which excluded the possibility of the double PitNETs [24,63]. Thus, mutation of some oncogenes may be the underlying mechanism of this transformation. More genetic evidence is needed to prove this hypothesis.

7. Conclusions and Prospect

Here, we presented a review of the published cases of PitNETs with phenotype transformation. We summarized the feature of the phenomenon and propose a specific definition of it. It is an unexpected and rare clinical phenomenon and has always been known that SCA causes CD when recurrent. In fact, PitNETs can undergo transformation of various aspects, including expression of hormones and transcription, secreted hormones and the corresponding syndromes. The tumors exhibit a wide spectrum of transformation and the outcomes are also heterogenous. Some exhibit aggressive clinical features and treatment resistance. Multiple therapies may be considered at an earlier time point and a long-period follow up is necessary. The mechanisms of transformation are still unknown. The existing hypothesis seem hard to explain the transformation with the heterogeneous spectrum completely. PC1/3, HWM ACTH and gene mutation may be involved in the mechanisms underlying transformation. Future studies using transcription factor detection and genome sequencing may be useful to explore the underlying mechanism of this rare transformation.
The major limitation of this review is the case size is small. On the one hand, this phenomenon is indeed rare; on the other hand, the non-uniform definition and name may have led us to miss some of the literature. Thus, clinicians need to recognize this rare phenomenon more clearly, and more potential cases are needed to clarify the features and guide clinical decisions. These particular PitNETs are precious material for figuring out the mechanism of secretary regulation and differentiation in PitNETs [45]. Like PC1/3 and erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular receptor 6, we can find or validate more regulation mechanisms through multi-omics analysis, for the tumors have minimal individual differences between the two phases [45,64]. However, in addition to the rarity of it, there is no way to predict the biological behavior so that surgeons can preserve specimens purposefully. A precise prediction model may help solve this problem [65].

Author Contributions

Z.L., Y.W., G.H., R.W. and X.B. contributed to the literature review, manuscript draft preparation, and revision of the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170799).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Day, P.F.; Loto, M.G.; Glerean, M.; Picasso, M.F.; Lovazzano, S.; Giunta, D.H. Incidence and prevalence of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas: Retrospective cohort study in a Health Management Organization in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 60, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Iglesias, P. Aggressive and Metastatic Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Therapeutic Management and Off-Label Drug Use. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 13, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Whyte, E.; Nezu, M.; Chik, C.; Tateno, T. Update on Current Evidence for the Diagnosis and Management of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors. Endocrinol. Metab. 2023, 38, 631–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ghalawinji, A.; Drezet, L.; Chaffanjon, P.; Muller, M.; Sturm, N.; Simiand, A.; Lazard, A.; Gay, E.; Chabre, O.; Cristante, J. Discontinuation of Drug Treatment in Cushing’s Disease Not Cured by Pituitary Surgery. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2024, 109, 1000–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, A.; Fang, C.; Yuan, L.; Shao, A.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, D. Oxidative stress in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: Affecting the tumor microenvironment and becoming a new target for pituitary neuroendocrine tumor therapy. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2023, 29, 2744–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Asa, S.L.; Mete, O.; Perry, A.; Osamura, R.Y. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors. Endocr. Pathol. 2022, 33, 6–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Daems, T.; Verhelst, J.; Michotte, A.; Abrams, P.; De Ridder, D.; Abs, R. Modification of hormonal secretion in clinically silent pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 2009, 12, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Melmed, S. Mechanisms for pituitary tumorigenesis: The plastic pituitary. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 112, 1603–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guerrero-Pérez, F.; Marengo, A.P.; Vidal, N.; Villabona, C. Pituitary Adenomas with Changing Phenotype: A Systematic Review. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2020, 128, 835–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vaughan, N.J.; Laroche, C.M.; Goodman, I.; Davies, M.J.; Jenkins, J.S. Pituitary Cushing’s disease arising from a previously non-functional corticotrophic chromophobe adenoma. Clin. Endocrinol. 1985, 22, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tan, E.U.; Ho, M.S.; Rajasoorya, C.R. Metamorphosis of a non-functioning pituitary adenoma to Cushing’s disease. Pituitary 2000, 3, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gheri, R.G.; Boddi, W.; Ammannati, F.; Olivotto, J.; Nozzoli, C.; Franchi, A.; Bordi, L.; Luisi, M.L.; Mennonna, P. Two-step development of a pituitary adenoma: From hyperprolactinemic syndrome to Cushing’s disease. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 1997, 20, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mindermann, T.; Kovacs, K.; Wilson, C.B. Changes in the immunophenotype of recurrent pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 1994, 35, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Melcescu, E.; Gannon, A.W.; Parent, A.D.; Fratkin, J.F.; Nicholas, W.C.; Koch, C.A.; Galhom, A. Silent or Subclinical Corticotroph Pituitary Macroadenoma Transforming Into Cushing Disease: 11-Year Follow-up. Neurosurgery 2013, 72, E144–E146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zoli, M.; Faustini-Fustini, M.; Mazzatenta, D.; Marucci, G.; De Carlo, E.; Bacci, A.; Pasquini, E.; Lanzino, G.; Frank, G. ACTH adenomas transforming their clinical expression: Report of 5 cases. Neurosurg. Focus 2015, 38, E15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brown, T.V.; Cheesman, K.C.; Post, K.D. Recurrent Pituitary Apoplexy in an Adenoma with Switching Phenotypes. AACE Clin. Case Rep. 2020, 6, e221–e224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dessimoz, C.; Browaeys, P.; Maeder, P.; Lhermitte, B.; Pitteloud, N.; Momjian, S.; Pralong, F.P. Transformation of a microprolactinoma into a mixed growth hormone and prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. Front. Endocrinol. 2011, 2, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Drummond, J.; Roncaroli, F.; Grossman, A.B.; Korbonits, M. Clinical and Pathological Aspects of Silent Pituitary Adenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 2473–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Demarchi, G.; Perrone, S.; Esper Romero, G.; De Bonis, C.; Casasco, J.P.; Sevlever, G.; Berner, S.I.; Cristina, C. Case Report: Progression of a Silent Corticotroph Tumor to an Aggressive Secreting Corticotroph Tumor, Treated by Temozolomide. Changes in the Clinic, the Pathology, and the β-Catenin and α-SMA Expression. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 870172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Andino-Ríos, G.G.; Portocarrero-Ortiz, L.; Rojas-Guerrero, C.; Terrones-Lozano, A.; Ortiz-Plata, A.; Reza-Albarrán, A.A. Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenoma That Changed to a Functional Gonadotropinoma. Case Rep. Endocrinol. 2018, 2018, 5027859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jahan, S.; Hasanat, M.A.; Mahmood, T.; Morshed, S.; Haq, R.; Fariduddin, M. Postoperative expression of Cushing disease in a young male: Metamorphosis of silent corticotroph adenoma? Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. Case Rep. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rotman, L.E.; Vaughan, T.B.; Hackney, J.R.; Riley, K.O. Long-Term Survival after Transformation of an Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Macroadenoma to a Silent Corticotroph Pituitary Carcinoma. World Neurosurg. 2019, 122, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, E.K.; Kim, J.H.; Yu, H.G. Candida albicans endophthalmitis in a patient with a non-functioning pituitary adenoma evolving into Cushing׳s disease: A case report. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2014, 6, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lania, A.G.; Ferrero, S.; Pivonello, R.; Mantovani, G.; Peverelli, E.; Di Sarno, A.; Beck-Peccoz, P.; Spada, A.; Colao, A. Evolution of an aggressive prolactinoma into a growth hormone secreting pituitary tumor coincident with GNAS gene mutation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brown, R.L.; Wollman, R.; Weiss, R.E. Transformation of a pituitary macroadenoma into to a corticotropin-secreting carcinoma over 16 years. Endocr. Pract. 2007, 13, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Salgado, L.R.; Machado, M.C.; Cukiert, A.; Liberman, B.; Kanamura, C.T.; Alves, V.A. Cushing’s disease arising from a clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Endocr. Pathol. 2006, 17, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kho, S.A.; Nieman, L.K.; Gelato, M.C. Cushing’s disease after surgical resection and radiation therapy for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Endocr. Pract. 2002, 8, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sano, T.; Kovacs, K.; Asa, S.L.; Yamada, S.; Sanno, N.; Yokoyama, S.; Takami, H. Pituitary adenoma with “honeycomb Golgi” appearance showing a phenotypic change at recurrence from clinically nonfunctioning to typical Cushing disease. Endocr. Pathol. 2002, 13, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kovacs, K.; Horvath, E.; Stefaneanu, L.; Bilbao, J.; Singer, W.; Muller, P.J.; Thapar, K.; Stone, E. Pituitary adenoma producing growth hormone and adrenocorticotropin: A histological, immunocytochemical, electron microscopic, and in situ hybridization study. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1998, 88, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cooper, M.E.; Murray, R.M.; Kalnins, R.; Woodward, J.; Jerums, G. The development of Cushing’s syndrome from a previously silent pituitary tumour. Aust. N. Z. J. Med. 1987, 17, 249–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Felix, I.; Asa, S.L.; Kovacs, K.; Horvath, E. Changes in hormone production of a recurrent silent corticotroph adenoma of the pituitary: A histologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and tissue culture study. Hum. Pathol. 1991, 22, 719–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ben-Shlomo, A.; Cooper, O. Silent corticotroph adenomas. Pituitary 2018, 21, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Batisse, M.; Raverot, G.; Maqdasy, S.; Durando, X.; Sturm, N.; Montoriol, P.F.; Kemeny, J.L.; Chazal, J.; Trouillas, J.; Tauveron, I. Aggressive silent GH pituitary tumor resistant to multiple treatments, including temozolomide. Cancer Investig. 2013, 31, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Taguchi, A.; Kinoshita, Y.; Tominaga, A.; Amatya, V.J.; Takeshima, Y.; Yamasaki, F. Metachronous Double Pituitary Adenoma with Altered Transcriptional Factor Profile: A Case Report and Literature Review. NMC Case Rep. J. 2021, 8, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Budan, R.M.; Georgescu, C.E. Multiple Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review. Front. Endocrinol. 2016, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fraser, L.A.; Lee, D.; Cooper, P.; Van Uum, S. Remission of acromegaly after pituitary apoplexy: Case report and review of literature. Endocr. Pract. 2009, 15, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zheng, X.Q.; Zhou, X.; Yao, Y.; Deng, K.; You, H.; Duan, L.; Zhu, H.J. Acromegaly complicated with fulminant pituitary apoplexy: Clinical characteristic analysis and review of literature. Endocrine 2023, 81, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ruiz, A.E.; Mazzaferri, E.L.; Skillman, T.G. Silent reversal of acromegaly: Pituitary apoplexy resulting in panhypopituitarism. Ohio State Med. J. 1969, 65, 1017–1020. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Fonseca, L.; Borges Duarte, D.; Freitas, J.; Oliveira, M.J.; Ribeiro, I.; Amaral, C.; Borges, T. Asymptomatic pituitary apoplexy induced by corticotropin-releasing hormone in a 14 year-old girl with Cushing’s disease. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. JPEM 2021, 34, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roerink, S.H.; van Lindert, E.J.; van de Ven, A.C. Spontaneous remission of acromegaly and Cushing’s disease following pituitary apoplexy: Two case reports. Neth. J. Med. 2015, 73, 242–246. [Google Scholar]
  41. Langlois, F.; Lim, D.S.T.; Yedinak, C.G.; Cetas, I.; McCartney, S.; Cetas, J.; Dogan, A.; Fleseriu, M. Predictors of silent corticotroph adenoma recurrence; a large retrospective single center study and systematic literature review. Pituitary 2018, 21, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tateno, T.; Izumiyama, H.; Doi, M.; Akashi, T.; Ohno, K.; Hirata, Y. Defective expression of prohormone convertase 1/3 in silent corticotroph adenoma. Endocr. J. 2007, 54, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tateno, T.; Izumiyama, H.; Doi, M.; Yoshimoto, T.; Shichiri, M.; Inoshita, N.; Oyama, K.; Yamada, S.; Hirata, Y. Differential gene expression in ACTH -secreting and non-functioning pituitary tumors. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2007, 157, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Raverot, G.; Wierinckx, A.; Jouanneau, E.; Auger, C.; Borson-Chazot, F.; Lachuer, J.; Pugeat, M.; Trouillas, J. Clinical, hormonal and molecular characterization of pituitary ACTH adenomas without (silent corticotroph adenomas) and with Cushing’s disease. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2010, 163, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Righi, A.; Faustini-Fustini, M.; Morandi, L.; Monti, V.; Asioli, S.; Mazzatenta, D.; Bacci, A.; Foschini, M.P. The changing faces of corticotroph cell adenomas: The role of prohormone convertase 1/3. Endocrine 2017, 56, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Holck, S.; Wewer, U.M.; Albrechtsen, R. Heterogeneity of secretory granules of silent pituitary adenomas. Mod. Pathol. 1988, 1, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Yamakita, N.; Murai, T.; Oki, Y.; Matsuhisa, T.; Hirata, T.; Ikeda, T.; Kuwayama, A.; Yasuda, K. Adrenal insufficiency after incomplete resection of pituitary macrocorticotropinoma of Cushing’s disease: Role of high molecular weight ACTH. Endocr. J. 2001, 48, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Matsuno, A.; Okazaki, R.; Oki, Y.; Nagashima, T. Secretion of high-molecular-weight adrenocorticotropic hormone from a pituitary adenoma in a patient without Cushing stigmata. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 2004, 101, 874–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Reincke, M.; Allolio, B.; Saeger, W.; Kaulen, D.; Winkelmann, W. A pituitary adenoma secreting high molecular weight adrenocorticotropin without evidence of Cushing’s disease. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987, 65, 1296–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tateno, T.; Kato, M.; Tani, Y.; Yoshimoto, T.; Oki, Y.; Hirata, Y. Processing of high-molecular-weight form adrenocorticotropin in human adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumor cell line (DMS-79) after transfection of prohormone convertase 1/3 gene. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2010, 33, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zheng, G.; Lu, L.; Zhu, H.; You, H.; Feng, M.; Liu, X.; Dai, C.; Yao, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, H.; et al. Clinical, Laboratory, and Treatment Profiles of Silent Corticotroph Adenomas That Have Transformed to the Functional Type: A Case Series With a Literature Review. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 558593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jacoby, L.B.; Hedley-Whyte, E.T.; Pulaski, K.; Seizinger, B.R.; Martuza, R.L. Clonal origin of pituitary adenomas. J. Neurosurg. 1990, 73, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caron, P. Acromegaly and pregnancy. Ann. D’endocrinologie 2011, 72, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Scheithauer, B.W.; Sano, T.; Kovacs, K.T.; Young, W.F., Jr.; Ryan, N.; Randall, R.V. The pituitary gland in pregnancy: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 69 cases. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1990, 65, 461–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Florio, T. Adult pituitary stem cells: From pituitary plasticity to adenoma development. Neuroendocrinology 2011, 94, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, L.; Ye, H.; Wang, X.; Tang, X.; Mao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Z.; Mao, X.O.; Xie, L.; Jin, K.; et al. Evidence of brain tumor stem progenitor-like cells with low proliferative capacity in human benign pituitary adenoma. Cancer Lett. 2014, 349, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, Q.; Yuan, X.; Tunici, P.; Liu, G.; Fan, X.; Xu, M.; Hu, J.; Hwang, J.Y.; Farkas, D.L.; Black, K.L.; et al. Isolation of tumour stem-like cells from benign tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 101, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cho, H.Y.; Cho, S.W.; Kim, S.W.; Shin, C.S.; Park, K.S.; Kim, S.Y. Silent corticotroph adenomas have unique recurrence characteristics compared with other nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Clin. Endocrinol. 2010, 72, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mete, O.; Gomez-Hernandez, K.; Kucharczyk, W.; Ridout, R.; Zadeh, G.; Gentili, F.; Ezzat, S.; Asa, S.L. Silent subtype 3 pituitary adenomas are not always silent and represent poorly differentiated monomorphous plurihormonal Pit-1 lineage adenomas. Mod. Pathol. 2016, 29, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cooper, O.; Ben-Shlomo, A.; Bonert, V.; Bannykh, S.; Mirocha, J.; Melmed, S. Silent corticogonadotroph adenomas: Clinical and cellular characteristics and long-term outcomes. Horm. Cancer 2010, 1, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Asa, S.L.; Mete, O.; Cusimano, M.D.; McCutcheon, I.E.; Perry, A.; Yamada, S.; Nishioka, H.; Casar-Borota, O.; Uccella, S.; La Rosa, S.; et al. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: A model for neuroendocrine tumor classification. Mod. Pathol. 2021, 34, 1634–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tordjman, K.M.; Greenman, Y.; Ram, Z.; Hershkovitz, D.; Aizenstein, O.; Ariel, O.; Asa, S.L. Plurihormonal Pituitary Tumor of Pit-1 and SF-1 Lineages, with Synchronous Collision Corticotroph Tumor: A Possible Stem Cell Phenomenon. Endocr Pathol. 2019, 30, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bogusławska, A.; Korbonits, M. Genetics of Acromegaly and Gigantism. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rubinfeld, H.; Cohen, Z.R.; Bendavid, U.; Fichman-Horn, S.; Levy-Barda, A.; David, C.; Melamed, P.; Shimon, I. Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular receptor B6 is highly expressed in non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors and its expression correlates with tumor size. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2024, 51, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rui, W.; Qiao, N.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Aili, A.; Zhang, Z.; Ye, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yao, Z. Radiomics analysis allows for precise prediction of silent corticotroph adenoma among non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Eur. Radiol. 2022, 32, 1570–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 16 01731 g001
Figure 1. PitNET phenotype clock. The pointers denote the hormone secretory model of the PitNET in a phase. IHC, immunochemistry; GH: growth hormone; PRL: prolactin; Pit-1: pituitary specific transcription factor 1; SF-1: steroidogenic factor 1 T-PIT: T-box family member TBX19; CD: Cushing’s disease.
Figure 1. PitNET phenotype clock. The pointers denote the hormone secretory model of the PitNET in a phase. IHC, immunochemistry; GH: growth hormone; PRL: prolactin; Pit-1: pituitary specific transcription factor 1; SF-1: steroidogenic factor 1 T-PIT: T-box family member TBX19; CD: Cushing’s disease.
Cancers 16 01731 g001
Cancers 16 01731 g002
Figure 2. Search and selection strategy of case reports for this review.
Figure 2. Search and selection strategy of case reports for this review.
Cancers 16 01731 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Wu, Y.; He, G.; Wang, R.; Bao, X. Phenotype Transformation of PitNETs. Cancers 2024, 16, 1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091731

AMA Style

Li Z, Wu Y, He G, Wang R, Bao X. Phenotype Transformation of PitNETs. Cancers. 2024; 16(9):1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhenwei, Yinzi Wu, Guannan He, Renzhi Wang, and Xinjie Bao. 2024. "Phenotype Transformation of PitNETs" Cancers 16, no. 9: 1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091731

APA Style

Li, Z., Wu, Y., He, G., Wang, R., & Bao, X. (2024). Phenotype Transformation of PitNETs. Cancers, 16(9), 1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop