Next Article in Journal
Enhancing CO2 Conversion to CO over Plasma-Deposited Composites Based on Mixed Co and Fe Oxides
Next Article in Special Issue
Trans Influence of Boryl Ligands in CO2 Hydrogenation on Ruthenium Complexes: Theoretical Prediction of Highly Active Catalysts for CO2 Reduction
Previous Article in Journal
Alcohol Oxidation Assisted by Molybdenum Hydrazonato Catalysts Employing Hydroperoxide Oxidants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in CO2 Adsorption Affinity Related to Ni Doping in FeS Surfaces: A DFT-D3 Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrochemical Incorporation of Carbon Dioxide into Fluorotoluene Derivatives under Mild Conditions

Departament de Química, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(8), 880; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11080880
Submission received: 25 June 2021 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 22 July 2021

Abstract

:
One of the main challenges to combat climate change is to eliminate or reuse Carbon dioxide (CO2), the largest contributor to the greenhouse gases that cause global warming. It is also important to synthesize compounds through greener technologies in order to obtain more environmentally friendly solutions. This study describes the electrocarboxylation process of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene using different working electrodes (glassy carbon, silver and copper) and electrolytes (polar aprotic solvent and ionic liquid). Carboxylated compounds were obtained in the same way in both electrolytic medias with more than 80% conversion rates, high yields, good selectivity, and moderate efficiencies using silver and copper as cathodes in organic electrolytes and ionic liquids.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Atmospheric CO2 is the main source of carbon for life on Earth. However, even though carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere is a trace gas compared to nitrogen (78.1%) and oxygen (20.9%), due to anthropogenic activity (fossil fuel combustion and deforestation) its atmospheric concentration has increased by about 43% since the beginning of industrialization [1]. Together with other anthropogenic gases, such as methane, CO2 is one of the greenhouse gases (GHG), and the largest contributor to global warming [2]. Renewable (or green) energy is a term that describes energy generated from environmentally friendly primary energy sources. Their production method does not emit by-products that can have a negative impact on the environment. Renewable energies include wind, hydroelectric, geothermal, tidal, solar, and biomass energies [3]. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) strategies involve several processes and materials used to sequester CO2 and store it underground long-term, e.g., in gas fields or reservoirs. Examples of strategies for CO2 capture and storage based on chemical systems are the use of aqueous amines, the most used of which are methanolamine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA), which are known to have a high affinity for CO2 [4]. Another common method is the use of MOFs [5] (with high potential but with less soft conditions), microalgae [6], bacteria, and ionic liquids [7].
CO2 is an abundant, low-cost, and non-flammable source of carbon, making it a C1 skeleton for building bigger molecules. Thanks to these properties, CO2 can act as a reagent, and is a very interesting component both for designing capture and utilization strategies (CCU) for obtaining chemical products and for its direct use as a solvent (supercritical CO2). Therefore, CO2 can be used in processes where it is converted into chemicals and fuels [8]. This can be achieved through carboxylation reactions in which the CO2 molecule is used as a precursor for organic compounds such as carbonates, acrylates, and polymers; or reduction reactions in which C=O bonds are broken to produce chemical compounds such as methane, methanol, syngas, urea, and formic acid [4,9,10,11].
The electrochemical reduction of CO2, in both protic and aprotic solvents, begins with the formation of the radical anion CO2. This radical anion is highly reactive and evolves in different ways depending on the working conditions. The main drawback associated with the direct electrochemical reduction of CO2 is that it occurs at very high reduction potentials. For example, CO2 is reduced beyond −2.2 V vs. SCE in aprotic solvents [12]. For this reason, different catalytic pathways for reducing CO2 have been established, concluding that radical anions of aromatic esters and nitriles are very selective catalysts that can produce high yields of oxalate in the electrochemical reduction of CO2, lowering the potential in which it occurs [12,13].
Another pathway in which CO2 can be electrochemically valorized within highly applied potentials is the electrocarboxylation process. This reaction consists in the utilization of CO2 as a reagent and carbon source for its incorporation in organic molecules, giving carboxylic acids or esters with one carbon elongation (Scheme 1). In this case, the reagent to be functionalized by incorporating CO2 is electrochemically activated instead of the gas. In general, this process is carried out at potentials that are less negative than CO2, allowing the in-situ generation of organic anions (R), which can potentially nucleophilically attack carbon dioxide leading to corresponding carboxylation processes.
There are different reports which described electrocarboxylation processed with a lot of different substrates [14,15]. One of the most studied and mature strategy to synthesize carboxylated compounds are the electrochemical carboxylations of organic halides, where Gennaro et al. showed that the use of silver as a working electrode improves the process because of the electrocatalytic properties of silver for C-halogen bond cleavage [16,17,18,19] or unsaturated compounds such as ketones [20], alcohols, or thioethers [21].
This pathway is an expanding track due to the associated working conditions (temperature and atmospheric pressure), which are more favorable and have a multitude of potential applications. However, the main disadvantage of performing electrochemical reactions is that protic or aprotic solvents are used, which are well-known hazardous substances, and supporting electrolytes are also used in high concentrations. Hence, an attractive alternative is the use of more sustainable solvents, such as ionic liquids. These are defined as fluids formed basically by ions, with low fusion points (less than 100 °C), and that have unique properties, such as viscosity, density, solubility, and hydrophobicity, which can be modified in function of the needs required. Moreover, in the second generation of ionic liquids are the room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs), which are liquids at working conditions [22]. Hence, using electrochemistry and RTILs together is an alternative for creating greener electrochemical routes, substituting traditional organic solvents employed with other solvents that are safer and more environmentally friendly [23,24,25].
This alternative route for synthesizing carboxylic acids could be employed with trifluoromethylated compounds [26,27]. These are an important group in the fluoro-alkyles group, and its carboxylic acid derivative has associated interest because it is a biologically active compound. In this regard, Savéant et al. [28] studied the reductive mechanism and reactivity of C–F bonds in trifluoromethylarenes, where the reduction leads to defluorinated products in a mechanism involving the formation of mono- and difluorinated species (Scheme 2). This reaction involves the elimination of a fluoride anion (F) from a radical anion that is rapidly protonated. The difference between fluorine, bromine, and chlorine species is the greater strength of the carbon–fluorine bond.
The standard potential for the formation of the radical anion species increases from the mono- di- and trifluorinated species, so that the reduction of the three carbon-fluorine bonds requires six electrons. According to the reduction mechanism proposed above, the generation of different organic anions from the reduction and breaking of the C-F bond makes it possible to design a priori an electrocarboxylation product route based on the electrochemical activation of fluorinated reagents under mild conditions (Scheme 3).
Thus, an attractive alternative to conventional electrochemical solvents for carrying out these processes would be the use of ionic liquids. This strategy, which would synergistically combine electrochemistry, CO2 valorization, and green solvents, which has not been studies for this kind of reagents, would make it possible to obtain carboxylic acids from α,α,α-trifluorotoluene, 1 (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

The electrochemical behavior of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene (1) was studied in different solvents and electrodes under an inert atmosphere in order to establish the optimal experimental conditions for the optimal electrochemical capture of CO2.

2.1. Electrochemical Reduction of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene under an Inert Atmosphere

2.1.1. Electrochemical Reduction Mechanism of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene in a Polar Aprotic Solvent

Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) were recorded at different scan rates (from 0.10 a 1.0 V s−1) using glassy carbon, GC (green line), silver, Ag (red line), and copper, Cu (black line) as working electrodes under a N2 atmosphere for a 10 mL solution of 1 in N,N’-dimethylformamide (DMF) using 0.10 M of tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBA PF6), Figure 2a. The same general trend was observed in all cases. Several subsequent irreversible multi-electron waves (~6 electrons) are shown, whose electrochemical parameters are summarized in Table 1. The use of silver and copper as a cathode seems to introduce a small electrocatalytic effect for the reduction processes performed in an aprotic organic electrolyte [29], due to the interaction between metal cathodes and reduction products obtained after electrochemical reduction and/or the intermediates.
A controlled potential electrolysis at a potential value of ca. 0.1 V more negative than the Epc (after the first reduction wave) was performed under an inert atmosphere using either carbon graphite (instead of glassy carbon), silver, or copper cathodes. The analysis of the sample after the electrolysis showed that the analogues of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene, 2, 3, and 4 lose fluoride atoms and are hydrogenated: . Table 2 summarizes conversion rates obtained, which are determined by 1H NMR and GC chromatography of the electrochemical crude reactions, and the Faraday efficiency of the process (reagent converted into product in function of the charge consumed). The yield of isolated products is ca. 5% less than the conversion rate values. This result is then compared to the observed quantity of product measured through another analytical method. It is possible to see that the use of Ag and Cu instead of carbon considerably increases the efficiency of the electrochemical reaction from 50% to 80%. Besides, the electrochemical processes were monitored by cyclic voltammetry (Figure 2b).
The electrochemical reduction mechanism of 1 in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6 under inert atmosphere was fully disclosed by the combined use of the electrochemical techniques mentioned above (cyclic voltammetry and controlled potential electrolysis experiments). Hence, it is possible to propose that 1 followed the electron transfer, chemical reaction, electron transfer (ECE) mechanism. Hence, in a first electrochemical step (E) the radical anion, 1, was generated. A first order chemical reaction (C) coupled to this first electron transfer led to the loss of fluoride anion and the obtention of a fluorobenzylic radical through a C–F bond cleavage reaction. Finally, the radical was reduced to an anion at the electrode surface (E), which later protonated by reacting with the solvent or the supporting electrolyte cation (Scheme 4). This was repeated to obtain fluoromethylbenzene, 3, and toluene, 4, as reported in the literature by Savéant and coworkers. [28] The chemical stability of the electrochemically generated a fluorobenzylic anion, which acts as a nucleophile leading, and opens the door to incorporating CO2 via the nucleophile–electrophile reaction through the electrochemical reduction of 1 under CO2 atmosphere.

2.1.2. Electrochemical Reduction Mechanism of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene in Ionic Liquid

Once the electrochemical behavior of 1 had been analyzed in an electrolytic media based on organic electrolytes, it was changed to a greener electrolyte. The ionic liquid selected to perform the electrochemical study was BMPyr TFSI because of its hydrophobicity, which helps in the extraction and recycling process. Moreover, it has an associated broad electrochemical window in which it is possible to see the electrochemical processes. Figure 3 shows the cyclic voltammetry response of a solution of 1 in the IL with the three working electrodes in an inert atmosphere. Different subsequent reduction irreversible multi-electron waves (~6 electrons) are observed between the cathodic potentials Epc = −2.8 V and Epc = −2.95 V (vs. SCE). Therefore, the same general electrochemical trend was observed when DMF was replaced by BMPyr TFSI under N2 atmosphere.
The electrochemical parameters for the electrochemical reduction of 1 are summarized in Table 3, which shows how the electron transfer is faster using the ionic liquid compared with the polar aprotic solvent (α value ca. 0.4 vs. ca. 0.2). It seems the solvation of 1, which is strongly related with the polarity of the electrolyte, favors the electron transfer process, being faster in IL than in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6. As a result, the ionic liquid can act as a (co)-catalyst making the electrochemical parameters, α and ΔEp, higher and lower in IL compared with organic electrolyte, respectively.
The number of electrons was obtained by functionalizing the intensity current and normalizing with a pattern of 9-fluorenone and titanocene (well-known cathodic redox probes) in the same experimental conditions.
With these data it is possible to propose the same ECE mechanism proposed above (Scheme 4) as the electrochemical mechanism for 1 in BMPyr TFSI, where compound 1 is reduced and loses its fluorine atoms in order to obtain products 2, 3, and 4.

2.2. Electrochemical Study of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene in a Saturated CO2 Atmosphere

Before studying the electrochemical behavior of 1 in CO2 saturated solutions, it is necessary to perform an electrochemical study of CO2 with the three cathodic materials and in both electrolytes. For this reason, we prepared different CO2 solutions in DMF and IL. The concentration of CO2 in solution was determined using a thermal mass flowmeter, gravimetric methods, as well as by comparison with well-known redox probes such as 9-fluorenone and titanocene.

2.2.1. CO2 Electrochemical Reduction Mechanism in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6 and BMPyr TFSI

Figure 4 shows the CO2 cyclic voltammetry in both electrolytic medias using three working electrodes. Using a carbon working electrode, it is not possible to see an electrochemical response of CO2 reduction, only a slight rise in the intensity current (Figure 4a,b). On the contrary, when using silver (Figure 4c,d) and copper (Figure 4e,f) as working electrodes there is a new peak related to the direct reduction of CO2 on their surface.
Table 4 summarizes the electrochemical parameters of the electron transfer obtained in both electrolytic medias, showing a slow irreversible electron transfer in both cases. It is important to highlight how that the nature of the cathode as well as the electrolyte shifted the reduction peak potential values, making the process energetically more favorable. The combined use of silver and copper cathodes and ILs, as catalyst and cocatalyst, allows to make lower the potential in which CO2 is reduced [23,24,25]. Note that the CO2 cathodic peak potential diminishes in 138 mV (with Cu) and 588 mV (with Ag) when the organic electrolyte (DMF/0.1M TBA PF6) is replaced by the ionic liquid (BMPyr TFSI). This can be explained by considering that the IL is a pure ion solvent, which means that the concentration of the counter-cation is considerably higher in IL than in DMF solution where “only” a 0.1 M concentration of tetrabutylammonium cation is present, so the formed product (1) would be strongly solvated in IL being the reduction potential value of the process less negative.

2.2.2. Electrocarboxylation of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6 and BMPyr TFSI

After electrochemically characterizing CO2 in both electrolytic medias with three working electrodes, a cyclic voltammetry study of 1 was performed in a saturated CO2 atmosphere. Figure 5 shows how new electron waves appear depending on the working material employed. Using a carbon working electrode, the same behavior as in the inert atmosphere is observed: only an irreversible, slow multielectron wave, with a slight rise in the current intensity (Figure 5a,b). However, when silver or copper are used as working electrodes, new reduction peaks appear at Epc ~ −2.6 V (vs. SCE) in DMF/0.1 M TBA PF6, which overlaps the wave related to the compound 1 reduction (Figure 5c,e). In the case of the BMPyr TFSI ionic liquid, a new peak appears at Epc ~ −2.0 V (vs. SCE) with silver (Figure 5d) as was reported in [30] and at Epc ~ −2.5 V (vs. SCE) with copper (Figure 5f), which overlaps with the wave related to compound 1 reduction.
These new peaks correspond with CO2 reduction on the surface of Ag and Cu, as was observed above, since both electrodes catalyze the direct reduction of CO2 on their surface. On the other hand, compound 1 has the same electrochemical behavior as in inert atmosphere, so it is possible to perform the electrocarboxylation reactions through the anions obtained in the ECE mechanism proposed for α,α,α-trifluorotoluene.
So, exhaustive control potential electrolysis (0.1 V more negative than the potential of the cathodic peak) was performed with solution 1 in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6 and BMPyr TFSI ionic liquid, using silver and copper because higher yields were obtained in an inert atmosphere. Next, the electrolysis methyl iodide (CH3I) was added to improve the extraction process and obtain the carboxylated compounds. The electrocarboxylation processes and products obtained are summarized in Table 5.
In solutions of DMF, the main product is 5 with both working electrodes, obtaining yields ca. 74–89% and efficiencies ca. 31–37% for the electrocarboxylation process. However, although after the first C-F cleavage the majority of the product of the electrocarboxylation process is obtained, the obtention of D1 and D2 (in the case of Ag), and 3 in the case of Cu, indicates that the electrocarboxylation process competes either with the hydrogenation and dimerization processes in Cu and Ag, respectively. The use of ionic liquids, BMPyr TFSI, as electrolyte favors the electrocarboxylation reaction being quantitative to the electrocarboxylation reaction when Ag or Cu are used as cathodes. This fact can be explained by taking in to account the greater stability of the fluorobenzylic anion as well as the higher concentration of CO2 under CO2 saturated atmosphere in the IL [25,30]. Finally, it is important to highlight that the use of Cu as a cathode increases the efficiency of the electrocarboxylation reaction, whereas the use of silver makes it totally selective.
Finally, with the combined use of the data obtained after cyclic voltammetry and control potential electrolysis, an ECE mechanism could be proposed followed by an electrocarboxylation process as a synthetic route for obtaining carboxylated fluorinated compounds through, α,α,α-trifluorotoluene in both organic and BMPyr TFSI electrolytes (Scheme 5).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen (N2) gases were purchased from Carburos Metálicos S.A. (Cornellà de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain), with a purity of 99.9999%. All of the commercially available reagents, α,α,α-trifluorotoluene, iodomethane (MeI), N,N’-dimethylformamide (DMF), and tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBA PF6) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain) with maximum purity and used as received. 1-butyl−1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulphonyl)imide (BMPyr TFSI) was acquired from Solvionic (Toulouse, France) and was dried with activated molecular sieves for 24 h to guarantee that the amount of water was always less than 100 ppm.

3.2. Electrochemical Experiments

A three-electrode electrochemical system in a one-compartment conical cell was used for the set-up of cyclic voltammetry (CV) and controlled potential electrolysis. The electrochemical details of those techniques have been previously described [13,19,21,22,23,24,25]. When either organic electrolytes and ionic liquids are used, the current values obtained were first normalized by the concentration and the scan rate (Ip/cv1/2) aiming the direct comparison between the cyclic voltammograms in the different cathodes (glassy carbon, silver and copper). For the electrolysis experiments, the disc working electrodes were replaced by a graphite carbon bar and silver or copper foils. Compounds were electrolyzed at a negative potential of 0.10 V more negative than the Epc potential value under nitrogen- or carbon dioxide-saturated solutions. When the reaction was completed, a methylation agent, methyl iodide (MeI or CH3I), was added to improve the extraction process and obtain the carboxylated compounds. The mixture was extracted in two different ways depending on the electrolyte media: when it is performed in DMF solutions, the mixture was extracted with water/ether mixtures (2:1). The organic layer was dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated to yield a residue. However, when IL is employed, the products of the electrolyzed solution were extracted with ether, making it possible to recover almost 80% of the ILs at the end of the process, after purification [25]. The organic layer was lastly washed with water and dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated to yield a residue. In some cases, the products were isolated using column chromatography. All residues or products obtained were dissolved in deuterated chloroform CDCl3 and characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR), gas chromatography (GC), and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) and compared with their respective pure commercially-available analogues.
1H-NMR and 19F-NMR measurements were performed in a Bruker DPX250 (250 MHz) with a Quattro Nucleus Probe (QNP) (Billerica, MA, USA). Proton Chemical shifts were reported in ppm (δ) (CDCl3, δ = 7.26). The J values are reported in Hz. Fluor Chemical shifts were reported in ppm (δ) (CDCl3). GC-MS analysis were performed using an Agilent Technologies 6850 GC instrument with a 5975C detector Hewlett Packard (Santa Clara, CA, USA).
PhCF3 (1): 1H RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.75–7.30 (m, 5H). 19F RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): −63.3 (s, 3F).
PhCF2H (2): 1H RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.48–7.30 (m, 5H); 6.64 (t, J = 56,5 Hz, 1H). 19F RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): −111.1 (s, 2F).
PhCFH2 (3): 1H RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.55–7.25 (m, 5H) 5.37 (d, J = 47.8 Hz, 2H).
PhCH3 (4): GC-MS (70 eV): m/z (%): 92.0 (78) [M+]; 91.0 (100) [M+ − H]; 65.0 (12) [M+ − C2H3]; 39.0 (11). 1H RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.33–7.10 (m, 5H); 2.34 (s, 3H).
PhCF2COOMe (5): GC-MS (70 eV): m/z (%): 186.0 (9) [M+]; 127.0 (100) [M+ − C2H3O2]; 77.0 (10) [M+ − C3H3O2F2]; 59.0 (4) [M+ − C7H5F2]. 1H RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.65–7.40 (m, 5H); 3.87 (s, 3H). 19F RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): −104.2 (s, 2F).
PhCF(COOMe)2 (6): 1H RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.45–7.25 (m, 5H); 3,80 (s, 6H). 19F RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): −152.5 (s, 1F).
PhCHFCOOMe (7): GC-MS (70 eV): m/z (%): 168.0 (25) [M+]; 109.0 (100) [M+ − C2H3O2]; 89.0 (5) [M+ − C2H4O2F]; 83.0 (11); 77.0 (3) [M+ − C3H4O2F]; 59.0 (7) [M+ − C7H6F]. 1H RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.65 – 7.40 (m, 5H); 5.82 (d, J = 47.9 Hz, 1H); 3.87 (s, 3H). 19F RMN (CDCl3) δ (ppm): −180.2 (d, 1F).
PhCH2CH2Ph (D1): GC-MS (70 eV): m/z (%): 182.1 (25) [M+]; 146.0 (17); 117.0 (8); 104.0 (8); 91.0 (100) [M+ − C7H7]; 73.0 (9); 65.0 (14); 43.0 (14).
PhCHFCH2Ph (D2): (70 eV): m/z (%): 200.1 (60) [M+]; 172.1 (17); 117.0 (20); 109.0 (100) [M+ − C7H7]; 91.0 (66) [M+ − C7H6F]; 82.0 (75); 65.0 (16); 54.0 (17); 41.0 (16).

3.3. Determination of the CO2 Concentration in Solution

A thermal mass flow meter (EL-FLOW® Mass Flow Meter/Controller, (Bronkhorst Hi-Tec, Ruurlo, Netherlands) was used to control CO2 concentrations in the solution. Secondary methods have been also used for verifying the CO2 concentration values. Hence, Titanocene (E0 = −1.07 V vs. SCE) was used as a one-electron redox probe in organic electrolytes, whereas a gravimetric methodology was used as also used for validating CO2 concentrations in ionic liquids.

4. Conclusions

This manuscript describes a new “environmentally-friendly” electrochemical approach for producing highly valuable compounds using CO2 as a building block in ILs through the electrochemical carboxylation of trifluoromethyl aromatic derivatives. The electrochemical reduction mechanism of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene (ECE) was determined with three different working electrodes: carbon, silver, and copper; and in two different electrolyte media: DMF/0.1M TBA PF6 and BMPyr TFSI ionic liquid. It was shown that the obtention of an anionic aromatic species after C-F cleavage could be used as a nucleophile in an electrochemical carboxylation process. Therefore, CO2 was characterized prior in both electrolytes with all the above-mentioned cathodic materials through cyclic voltammetry. Next, a “green electrochemical” was design in organic electrolytes and ILs. α,α,α-Trifluorotoluene (PhCF3) was carboxylated through a control potential electrolysis in saturated CO2 solutions. We obtained quantitative electrocarboxylation yields and good efficiencies when Cu or Ag cathodes were employed in ILs. Finally, the use of Ag and ILs allow to design a fully quantitative and selective electrochemical carboxylation reaction for obtaining PhCF2COOMe from PhCF3COOMe in mild conditions.

Author Contributions

G.G. conceived and designed the experiments; S.M. and J.B. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. S.M. and G.G. wrote the paper. Funding Acquisition, G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by MINECO/FEDER (project CTQ2015-65439-R) and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2019-106171RB-I00) of Spain.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain for financial support though the project CTQ 2015-65439-R and PID2019-106171RB-I00. S.M. is grateful to the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona for pre-doctoral PIF fellowships.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bekun, F.V.; Alola, A.A.; Sarkodie, S.A. Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 657, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Şen, Z. Global warming threat on water resources and environment: A review. Environ. Earth Sci. 2009, 57, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gielen, D.; Boshell, F.; Saygin, D.; Bazilian, M.D.; Wagner, N.; Gorini, R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019, 24, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Godin, J.; Liu, W.; Ren, S.; Xu, C.C. Advances in recovery and utilization of carbon dioxide: A brief review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ikreedeegh, R.R.; Tahir, M. A critical review in recent developments of metal-organic-frameworks (MOFs) with band engineering alteration for photocatalytic CO2 reduction to solar fuels. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 43, 101381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Babin, A.; Vaneeckhaute, C.; Iliuta, M.C. Potential and challenges of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage as a carbon-negative energy source: A review. Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 146, 105968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bara, J.E.; Camper, D.E.; Gin, D.; Noble, R.D. Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids and Composite Materials: Platform Technologies for CO2 Capture. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Atsbha, T.A.; Yoon, T.; Seongho, P.; Lee, C.-J. A review on the catalytic conversion of CO2 using H2 for synthesis of CO, methanol, and hydrocarbons. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 44, 101413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Da Cruz, T.T.; Balestieri, J.A.P.; de Silva, J.M.T.; Vilanova, M.R.; Oliveira, O.J.; Ávila, I. Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage/utilization: From current state to future research directions and opportunities. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2021, 108, 103309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saravanan, A.; Kumar, P.S.; Vo, D.V.N.; Jeevanantham, S.; Bhuvaneswari, V.; Anantha Narayanan, V.; Yaashikaa, P.R.; Swetha, S.; Reshma, B. A Comprehensive Review on Different Approaches for CO2 Utilization and Conversion Pathways. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 236, 116515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, D.-G.; He, L.-N. Introduction to CO2 utilisation. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 3499–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gennaro, A.; Isse, A.A.; Savéant, J.M.; Severin, M.G.; Vianello, E. Homogeneous Electron Transfer Catalysis of the Electro-chemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Do Aromatic Anion Radicals React in an Outer-Sphere Manner? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7190–7196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mena, S.; Guirado, G. Electrochemical Tuning of CO2 Reactivity in Ionic Liquids Using Different Cathodes: From Oxalate to Carboxylation Products. C 2020, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Matthessen, R.; Fransaer, J.; Binnemans, K.; De Vos, D.E. Electrocarboxylation: Towards sustainable and efficient synthesis of valuable carboxylic acids. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 2484–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Senboku, H.; Katayama, A. Electrochemical carboxylation with carbon dioxide. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2017, 3, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Isse, A.A.; Ferlin, M.G.; Gennaro, A. Homogeneous electron transfer catalysis in the electrochemical carboxylation of arylethyl chlorides. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2003, 541, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Isse, A.A.; Falciola, L.; Mussini, P.R.; Gennaro, A. Relevance of electron transfer mechanism in electrocatalysis: The reduction of organic halides at silver electrodes. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1, 344–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Isse, A.A.; Durante, C.; Gennaro, A. One-pot synthesis of benzoic acid by electrocatalytic reduction of bromobenzene in the presence of CO2. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 810–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reche, I.; Mena, S.; Gallardo, I.; Guirado, G. Electrocarboxylation of halobenzonitriles: An environmentally friendly synthesis of phthalate derivatives. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 320, 134576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Isse, A.A.; Galia, A.; Belfiore, C.; Silvestri, G.; Gennaro, A. Electrochemical reduction and carboxylation of halobenzophenones. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 526, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mena, S.; Loault, C.; Mesa, V.; Gallardo, I.; Guirado, G. Electrochemical reduction of 4-nitrobenzyl phenyl thioether for activation and capture of CO2. ChemElectroChem 2021, 21, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tan, X.; Sun, X.; Han, B. Ionic Liquid-Based electrolytes for CO2 electroreduction and CO2 electroorganic transformation. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mena, S.; Gallardo, I.; Guirado, G. Electrocatalytic Processes for the Valorization of CO2: Synthesis of Cyanobenzoic Acid Using Eco-Friendly Strategies. Catalysts 2019, 9, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Mena, S.; Sanchez, J.; Guirado, G. Electrocarboxylation of 1-chloro-(4-isobutylphenyl)ethane with a silver cathode in ionic liquids: An environmentally benign and efficient way to synthesize Ibuprofen. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 15115–15123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mena, S.; Santiago, S.; Gallardo, I.; Guirado, G. Sustainable and efficient electrosynthesis of naproxen using carbon dioxide and ionic liquids. Chemosphere 2020, 245, 125557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Strategies for nucleophilic, electrophilic, and radical trifluoromethylations. J. Fluor. Chem. 2007, 128, 975–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoo, W.J.; Kondo, J.; Rodríguez-Santamaría, J.A.; Nguyen, T.V.Q.; Kobayashi, S. Efficient Synthesis of α-Trifluoromethyl Carboxylic Acids and Esters through Fluorocarboxylation of Gem-Difluoroalkenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 6772–6775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Andrieux, C.P.; Combellas, C.; Kanoufi, F.; Savéant, J.M.; Thiébault, A. Dynamics of Bond Breaking in Ion Radicals. Mech-anisms and Reactivity in the Reductive Cleavage of Carbon-Fluorine Bonds of Fluoromethylarenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9527–9540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Isse, A.A.; Gottardello, S.; Durante, C.; Gennaro, A. Dissociative electron transfer to organic chlorides: Electrocatalysis at metal cathodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 2409–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reche, I.; Gallardo, I.; Guirado, G. Cyclic voltammetry using silver as cathode material: A simple method for determining electro and chemical features and solubility values of CO2 in ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 2339–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Electrochemical carboxylation process.
Scheme 1. Electrochemical carboxylation process.
Catalysts 11 00880 sch001
Scheme 2. Electrochemical reduction mechanism of trifluoromethylarene compounds proposed mechanism by Savéant et al. Reprinted with permission form reference [28]. Copyright © 1997, American Chemical Society.
Scheme 2. Electrochemical reduction mechanism of trifluoromethylarene compounds proposed mechanism by Savéant et al. Reprinted with permission form reference [28]. Copyright © 1997, American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 11 00880 sch002
Scheme 3. Proposed route for the electrochemical valorization of CO2 through its electrochemical incorporation in α,α,α-trifluorotoluene with an electrocarboxylation process.
Scheme 3. Proposed route for the electrochemical valorization of CO2 through its electrochemical incorporation in α,α,α-trifluorotoluene with an electrocarboxylation process.
Catalysts 11 00880 sch003
Figure 1. Chart of structures. Compound 1 is the reactant, whereas compounds 2-7 and D1-D2 are products obtained after controlled potential electrolysis under nitrogen or carbon dioxide atmosphere.
Figure 1. Chart of structures. Compound 1 is the reactant, whereas compounds 2-7 and D1-D2 are products obtained after controlled potential electrolysis under nitrogen or carbon dioxide atmosphere.
Catalysts 11 00880 g001
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of a 5–25 mM solution of 1 in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6. Scan rate: 0.3 V·s−1. Pt: counter electrode (CE), saturated calomel electrode (SCE): reference electrode (RE). working electrode (WE). (a) Glassy carbon (GC, green line), Ag (red line), Cu (black line). (b) Electrolysis monitorization through CV using with GC as a WE.
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of a 5–25 mM solution of 1 in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6. Scan rate: 0.3 V·s−1. Pt: counter electrode (CE), saturated calomel electrode (SCE): reference electrode (RE). working electrode (WE). (a) Glassy carbon (GC, green line), Ag (red line), Cu (black line). (b) Electrolysis monitorization through CV using with GC as a WE.
Catalysts 11 00880 g002
Scheme 4. Proposed mechanism for the electrochemical reduction of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene.
Scheme 4. Proposed mechanism for the electrochemical reduction of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene.
Catalysts 11 00880 sch004
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry of 24 mM of 1 in BMPyr TFSI with WE GC (green line), Ag (red line), Cu (black line), CE Pt and RE SCE. Scan rate: 0.3 V·s−1.
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry of 24 mM of 1 in BMPyr TFSI with WE GC (green line), Ag (red line), Cu (black line), CE Pt and RE SCE. Scan rate: 0.3 V·s−1.
Catalysts 11 00880 g003
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammetry of CO2 saturated solutions of DMF/0.1 M TBA PF6 with WE: (a) GC (c) WE Ag and (e) WE Cu. Cyclic voltammograms of CO2 saturated solutions of BMPyr TFSI with WE: (b) GC (d) Ag (f) Cu. Scan rate: 0.5 V·s−1.
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammetry of CO2 saturated solutions of DMF/0.1 M TBA PF6 with WE: (a) GC (c) WE Ag and (e) WE Cu. Cyclic voltammograms of CO2 saturated solutions of BMPyr TFSI with WE: (b) GC (d) Ag (f) Cu. Scan rate: 0.5 V·s−1.
Catalysts 11 00880 g004
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammetry of solutions of 10–25 mM of 1 and 0.1–0.4M [CO2] in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6 using as WE (a) GC, (c) Ag and (e) Cu. Cyclic voltammograms in BMPyr TFSI with WE (b) GC, (d) Ag and (f) Cu. Scan rate: 0.5 V·s1.
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammetry of solutions of 10–25 mM of 1 and 0.1–0.4M [CO2] in DMF/0.1M TBA PF6 using as WE (a) GC, (c) Ag and (e) Cu. Cyclic voltammograms in BMPyr TFSI with WE (b) GC, (d) Ag and (f) Cu. Scan rate: 0.5 V·s1.
Catalysts 11 00880 g005
Scheme 5. Proposed mechanism for the electrochemical activation of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene followed by electrochemical carboxylation.
Scheme 5. Proposed mechanism for the electrochemical activation of α,α,α-trifluorotoluene followed by electrochemical carboxylation.
Catalysts 11 00880 sch005
Table 1. Electrochemical parameters for a solution of 5.5–15 mM of 1 in DMF/0.1 M TBA PF6, for WE GC (d = 1 mm), Ag (d = 3 mm) and Cu (d = 3 mm).
Table 1. Electrochemical parameters for a solution of 5.5–15 mM of 1 in DMF/0.1 M TBA PF6, for WE GC (d = 1 mm), Ag (d = 3 mm) and Cu (d = 3 mm).
WEv (V/s)Epc (V vs. SCE)ΔEp (mV) aα
GC0.1−2.721950.25
0.3−2.752000.24
0.5−2.762090.23
0.7−2.731970.24
1.0−2.762030.24
Ag0.1−2.702350.21
0.3−2.712410.20
0.5−2.752410.20
0.7−2.782460.20
1.0−2.782530.19
Cu0.1−2.682080.23
0.3−2.692140.22
0.5−2.692180.22
0.7−2.702220.22
1.0−2.722310.21
a ΔEp (mV) = (Epc − Ep1/2)·1000.
Table 2. Product distribution after control potential electrolysis of 1 in DMF/0.1 M TBA PF6 with carbon graphite, silver, and copper cathodes.
Table 2. Product distribution after control potential electrolysis of 1 in DMF/0.1 M TBA PF6 with carbon graphite, silver, and copper cathodes.
CathodeEapplied
(V vs. SCE)
C·mol−1Products ObtainedConversion Rates aEfficiency
C−2.94.727450%
326
Ag−2.94.025080%
350
4Traces
Cu−2.93.71Traces80%
252
348
a Abundance of specie i /Abundance of all species (through 1H RMN and 19F RMN).
Table 3. Electrochemical parameters for a solution of 24 mM of 1 in BMPyr TFSI, using as a working electrodes (WE): GC (d = 1 mm), Ag (d = 3 mm) and Cu (d = 3 mm).
Table 3. Electrochemical parameters for a solution of 24 mM of 1 in BMPyr TFSI, using as a working electrodes (WE): GC (d = 1 mm), Ag (d = 3 mm) and Cu (d = 3 mm).
WEv (V/s)Epc (V vs. SCE)ΔEp (mV) aαnº Electrons b
GC0.1−2.861100.447.74
0.3−2.871090.446.55
0.5−2.891020.476.53
0.7−2.911200.406.15
1−2.921260.385.95
113 ± 90.436.6 ± 0.7
Ag0.1−2.86990.497.66
0.3−2.87960.507.03
0.5−2.88990.496.36
0.7−2.891070.456.02
1−2.901130.435.80
103 ± 70.476.6 ± 0.8
Cu0.1−2.791030.477.24
0.3−2.801020.477.04
0.5−2.831230.396.83
0.7−2.831240.396.04
1−2.851360.356.08
118 ± 140.416.6 ± 0.6
a ΔEp (mV) = (Epc − Ep1/2)·1000. b The number of electrons was obtained by functionalizing the intensity current and normalizing with a pattern of 9-fluorenone and titanocene (well-known cathodic redox probes) in the same experimental conditions. The bold data is the average of the numbers in the column, which are above them.
Table 4. Electrochemical parameters for solutions of CO2 in both electrolytic medias, with the use of GC, Ag, and Cu cathodes).
Table 4. Electrochemical parameters for solutions of CO2 in both electrolytic medias, with the use of GC, Ag, and Cu cathodes).
CathodeEpc (V) vs. SCEΔEp (mV) aα b[CO2] (mM)
DMF/0.1M TBA PF6
GC----
Ag−2.6382440.20118
Cu−2.6761920.25118
BuMePyr TFSI
GC----
Ag−2.0501440.33454
Cu−2.5383750.13454
a ΔEp (mV) = (Epc − Ep1/2). b ΔEp (mV) = 47.7/α.
Table 5. Products obtained after the electrochemical carboxylation of 1 in both electrolytic medias with three different cathode materials.
Table 5. Products obtained after the electrochemical carboxylation of 1 in both electrolytic medias with three different cathode materials.
DMF/0.1M TBA PF6
CathodeEapplied
(V)
C·mol−1Defluorinated Products
(Yield%) a
Carboxylated Products
(Yield%) a
Efficiency
Electrocarboxylation
Ag−2.86.2D1 (6%)5 (82%)31%
D2 (5%)7 (7%)
Cu−2.84.23 (26%)5 (70%)37%
6 (4%)
BuMePyr TFSI
CathodeEapplied
(V)
C·mol−1Carboxylated ProductsYield aEfficiency
Electrocarboxylation
Ag−2.96.05100%33%
Cu−2.96.0531%56%
769%
a Abundance if species i/Abundance of all species (through CG/MS).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mena, S.; Bernad, J.; Guirado, G. Electrochemical Incorporation of Carbon Dioxide into Fluorotoluene Derivatives under Mild Conditions. Catalysts 2021, 11, 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11080880

AMA Style

Mena S, Bernad J, Guirado G. Electrochemical Incorporation of Carbon Dioxide into Fluorotoluene Derivatives under Mild Conditions. Catalysts. 2021; 11(8):880. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11080880

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mena, Silvia, Jesus Bernad, and Gonzalo Guirado. 2021. "Electrochemical Incorporation of Carbon Dioxide into Fluorotoluene Derivatives under Mild Conditions" Catalysts 11, no. 8: 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11080880

APA Style

Mena, S., Bernad, J., & Guirado, G. (2021). Electrochemical Incorporation of Carbon Dioxide into Fluorotoluene Derivatives under Mild Conditions. Catalysts, 11(8), 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11080880

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop