Next Article in Journal
Biodiesel Synthesis from Date Seed Oil Using Camel Dung as a Novel Green Catalyst: An Experimental Investigation
Previous Article in Journal
New Catalysts and Reactors for the Synthesis or Conversion of Methanol
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Methane to Methanol Oxidation over Iron and Copper Sites in Metal–Organic Frameworks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Catalytic Oxidation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide (2nd Edition)

by
Hongxing Dai
1,* and
Junhu Wang
2,*
1
Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2
Center for Advanced Mössbauer Spectroscopy, Mössbauer Effect Data Center, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2024, 14(9), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14090642
Submission received: 8 August 2024 / Accepted: 18 September 2024 / Published: 20 September 2024
The catalytic removal of carbon monoxide and methane produced from human activities is an important method for eliminating these pollutants, and can solve their associated environmental problems. So far, heterogeneous catalysis has been considered one of the most appropriate and sustainable strategies to remove pollutants that are harmful to the atmosphere. This Special Issue within the Section “Environmental Catalysis”, “Advances in Catalytic Oxidation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide (2nd Edition)”, is a collection of seven articles, including three original papers and four review papers, which address the issues of CO oxidation, CH4 combustion, and the partial oxidation of CH4 to oxygenates.
The catalytic oxidation of CO at low temperatures is an important aspect of air purification. Since the discovery of CO oxidation catalyzed by TiO2-supported nanoparticles (NPs) at a temperature far below 0 °C, reported by Haruta et al. in 1987 [1], Au NPs supported on reducible metal oxides [2,3,4,5,6] have gained much attention. Since the catalytic performance of Au NPs significantly depends upon the particle size and the type of support used [7], a large number of preparation methods have been developed to enable the loading of noble metal NPs onto different supports [7,8,9], in which Au works as the CO adsorption site, and O2 is activated in the oxygen vacancies of the reducible metal oxide supports [9,10,11,12].
In contribution 1, Takahashi et al. investigated Au clusters supported on defect-rich Ni-Ti oxides derived from ultrafine layered double hydroxides (LDHs) for CO oxidation at an ambient temperature. The authors found that the rich hydroxyl groups at the edge sites of the LDHs could serve as the anchoring sites for the metal nanoparticles (NPs), and the transformation of the LDHs into mixed metal oxides (MMOs) gave rise to abundant oxygen vacancies favorable for O2 activation during the CO oxidation process, thus exemplifying the high activity rate and good hydrothermal stability of the Au/Ni-Ti MMO/SiO2 catalyst. In contribution 2, Timmer et al. presented an investigation into the active phase of RuO2 in a catalytic CO oxidation reaction, employing operando CO diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and online mass spectrometry (MS). By utilizing the combined techniques of DRIFTS and MS, the authors clarified the active phase of RuO2 supported on rutile TiO2 (RuO2@TiO2) during a CO oxidation reaction, and concluded that the partially reduced RuO2@TiO2 catalyst was the most active during CO oxidation, and this was independent of the reducing or oxidizing condition and whether the starting material was the fully oxidized or partially reduced RuO2@TiO2 catalyst. Qin et al. (contribution 3) studied CO oxidation over Au/SBA-15 modified with TiO2 films grown via atomic layer deposition (ALD), and found a synergy between the Au and TiO2 phases when it related to the bonding and conversion of CO, which could be controllably tuned by varying the synthesis parameters. Simultaneously, the authors also suggested that the ALD of TiO2 films could be an effective way to maximize the Au–TiO2 interface sites, which would be beneficial for the activation of molecular oxygen.
As the main component of natural gas, incomplete methane combustion results in wasted resources and aggravates air pollution. Over the last twenty years, the global warming potential of CH4 has been shown to be at least 72 times higher than that of CO2, inducing a strong greenhouse effect on the atmosphere. CH4 with a regular tetrahedral structure is the most stable hydrocarbon, meaning it is difficult to activate and oxidize under mild conditions. The conventional combustion of natural gas requires high temperatures (>1500 °C) and produces pollutants (e.g., carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides) that must be completely eliminated. As of late, the complete catalytic oxidation of methane (i.e., catalytic methane combustion) has been one of the most promising pathways for removing emitted methane, in which the key issue is the availability of high-performance catalysts. In the past few decades, a large number of catalysts have been developed for the combustion of methane, including transition metal oxides, noble metals, mixed metal oxides (such as perovskites (ABO3), double perovskites (A2BBO6), perovskite-like oxides (A2BO4), and pyrochlore (A2B2O7)), and hexaaluminates. In recent years, several reviews on catalytic methane combustion have been reported in the literature [13,14,15,16,17].
Of the abovementioned catalysts, porous materials are the most promising candidates. For example, Dai and coworkers (contribution 4) summarized the recent progress made in preparation methods and applications of ordered porous oxides. They supported the use of noble metal catalysts for methane combustion, and suggested that their well-ordered and -developed three-dimensional porous structure, large surface area, ultrahigh component dispersion, fast mass transfer, low-temperature reducibility, reactant activation ability, and strong metal–support interaction were accountable for their good catalytic activity, hydrothermal stability, and moisture and sulfur resistance. Additionally, the authors envisioned a future trend in the development of oxide materials for industrial applications. In contribution 5, Wu et al. summarized the development of zeolite-based catalytic materials for the activation of the C–H bonds in CH4 and the mechanisms of complete and selective methane oxidation. In the developed catalysts, a Pd/zeolite material was used for the complete oxidation of methane to CO2 and H2O, while Fe- and Cu-zeolite materials were employed for the partial oxidation of methane to methanol (MTM), formaldehyde, formic acid, etc. The authors also proposed possible perspectives and challenges for zeolite-based catalysts in future research and practical applications.
Direct MTM conversion is an ideal strategy for significantly reducing transportation and storage costs [18]. The partial oxidation of MTM as a liquid fuel and chemical feedstock has been considered one of the most desirable methane conversion pathways. In the past few years, many efforts have been made to explore new catalyst systems and design strategies for direct methanol production from methane under mild conditions with controlled oxidation processes [19,20,21].
Zhao and coworkers (contribution 6) presented an overview of a rational design of catalysts for the direct conversion of methane to methanol based on a descriptor approach, in which they explored the suitable energy, electronic, and structural descriptors to construct and understand the linear scaling relationships between the fundamental physicochemical properties of the catalysts and their catalytic activities in direct MTM conversion. According to the selectivity descriptor, the limitation of the inverse scaling relationship between methane conversion and methanol selectivity was discussed, and how this limitation can be exceeded to achieve the simultaneous enhancement of activity and selectivity. The authors believed that their descriptor-based review article provided theoretical insights into the understanding, optimization, and rational design of efficient catalysts for direct MTM conversion. In contribution 7, Tavani et al. explored MTM oxidation over iron and copper sites in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). They focused on the utilization of diverse spectroscopic techniques to clarify the electronic and structural properties of iron- and copper-embedded MOF catalysts at microscopic levels and their reaction pathways and intermediates, and also discussed the catalytic efficiency and selectivity of these MOF-based materials for the MTM reaction. In the end, the authors provided a perspective on possible directions for future research on advancing the use of MOFs for the MTM reaction.
Hence, this Special Issue allows readers to gain a clear insight into the oxidation of CO and the complete or particle oxidation of methane over the supported transition metal or noble metal catalysts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.D. and J.W.; formal analysis, H.D. and J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, H.D.; writing—review and editing, J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

As Guest Editors of the Special Issue “Advances in Catalytic Oxidation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide (2nd Edition)”, we would like to express our meaningful appreciation to all of the authors for submitting their valuable research that contributed to this edition’s success.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Takahashi, A.; Nakayama, A.; Murayama, T.; Sakaguchi, N.; Shimada, T.; Takagi, S.; Ishida, T. Au Clusters Supported on Defect-Rich Ni-Ti Oxides Derived from Ultrafine Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs) for CO Oxidation at Ambient Temperature. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13081155.
  • Timmer, P.; Glatthaar, L.; Weber, T.; Over, H. Identifying the Active Phase of RuO2 in the Catalytic CO Oxidation Reaction, Employing Operando CO Infrared Spectroscopy and Online Mass Spectrometry. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13081178.
  • Qin, X.D.; Ke, W.; Vazquez, Y.; Lee, I.; Zaera, F. CO Oxidation Catalyzed by Au Dispersed on SBA-15 Modified with TiO2 Films Grown via Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD). Catalysts 2023, 13, 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13071106.
  • Lin, H.X.; Liu, Y.X.; Deng, J.G.; Jing L.; Dai, H.X. Methane Combustion over the Porous Oxides and Supported Noble Metal Catalysts. Catalysts 2023, 13, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020427.
  • Wu, L.; Fan, W.; Wang, X.; Lin, H.; Tao, J.; Liu, Y.; Deng, J.; Jing, L.; Dai, H. Methane Oxidation over the Zeolites-Based Catalysts. Catalysts 2023, 13, 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13030604.
  • Li, Z.; Chen, Y.; Xie, Z.; Song, W.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Z. Rational Design of the Catalysts for the Direct Conversion of Methane to Methanol Based on a Descriptor Approach. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13081226.
  • Tavani, F.; Tofoni, A.; D’Angelo, P. Exploring the Methane to Methanol Oxidation over Iron and Copper Sites in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101338.

References

  1. Haruta, M.; Kobayashi, T.; Sano, H.; Yamada, N. Novel Gold Catalysts for the Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide at a Temperature Far Below 0 °C. Chem. Lett. 1987, 16, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Green, I.X.; Tang, W.; Neurock, M.; Yates, J.T., Jr. Spectroscopic Observation of Dual Catalytic Sites during Oxidation of CO on A Au/TiO2 Catalyst. Science 2011, 333, 736–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, X.Y.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T.; Mou, C.-Y. Catalysis by Gold: New Insights into the Support Effect. Nano Today 2013, 8, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, F.; Evans, J.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Liu, P. CO Oxidation on Gold-Supported Iron Oxides: New Insights into Strong Oxide–Metal Interactions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 16614–16622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Odarchenko, Y.; Martin, D.J.; Arnold, T.; Beale, A.M. CO Oxidation over Supported Gold Nanoparticles as Revealed by Operando Grazing Incidence X-ray Scattering Analysis. Faraday Discuss. 2018, 208, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferraz, C.P.; Navarro-Jaén, S.; Rossi, L.M.; Dumeignil, F.; Ghazzal, M.N.; Wojcieszak, R. Enhancing the Activity of Gold Supported Catalysts by Oxide Coating: Towards Efficient Oxidations. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 8453–8457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ishida, T.; Murayama, T.; Taketoshi, A.; Haruta, M. Importance of Size and Contact Structure of Gold Nanoparticles for the Genesis of Unique Catalytic Processes. Chem. Rev. 2019, 120, 464–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gustafson, J.; Balmes, O.; Zhang, C.; Shipilin, M.; Schaefer, A.; Hagman, B.; Merte, L.R.; Martin, N.M.; Carlsson, P.A.; Jankowski, M.; et al. The Role of Oxides in Catalytic CO Oxidation over Rhodium and Palladium. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4438–4445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ishida, T.; Koga, H.; Okumura, M.; Haruta, M. Advances in Gold Catalysis and Understanding the Catalytic Mechanism. Chem. Rec. 2016, 16, 2278–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fujitani, T.; Nakamura, I. Mechanism and Active Sites of the Oxidation of CO over Au/TiO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10144–10147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Widmann, D.; Behm, R.J. Activation of Molecular Oxygen and the Nature of the Active Oxygen Species for CO Oxidation on Oxide Supported Au Catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, S.H.; Liu, Y.X.; Deng, J.G.; Yang, J.; Zhao, X.T.; Han, Z.; Zhang, K.F.; Lu, Y.; Liu, F.D.; Dai, H.X. Carbon Monoxide Oxidation over rGO-Mediated Gold/Cobalt Oxide Catalysts with Strong Metal–Support Interaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 31467–31476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ciuparu, D.; Lyubovsky, M.R.; Altman, E.; Pfefferle, L.D.; Datye, A. Catalytic Combustion of Methane over Palladium-Based Catalysts. Catal. Rev. 2002, 44, 593–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gélin, P.; Primet, M. Complete Oxidation of Methane at Low Temperature over Noble Metal Based Catalysts: A Review. Appl. Catal. B 2002, 39, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, J.; Guo, Y.B. Nanostructured Perovskite Oxides as Promising Substitutes of Noble Metals Catalysts for Catalytic Combustion of Methane. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bashan, V.; Ust, Y. Perovskite Catalysts for Methane Combustion: Applications, Design, Effects for Reactivity and Partial Oxidation. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 7755–7789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nkinahamira, F.; Yang, R.J.; Zhu, R.S.; Zhang, J.W.; Ren, Z.Y.; Sun, S.L.; Xiong, H.F.; Zeng, Z.Y. Current Progress on Methods and Technologies for Catalytic Methane Activation at Low Temperatures. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2204566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Srivastava, R.K.; Sarangi, P.K.; Bhatia, L.; Singh, A.K.; Shadangi, K.P. Conversion of Methane to Methanol: Technologies and Future Challenges. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2022, 12, 1851–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cui, X.J.; Huang, R.; Deng, D.H. Catalytic Conversion of C1 Molecules under Mild Conditions. EnergyChem 2021, 3, 100050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, T.; Li, Z.; Lin, L.; Chu, S.Q.; Su, Y.; Song, W.Y.; Wang, A.Q.; Weckhuysen, B.M.; Luo, W.H. Highly Selective Oxidation of Methane into Methanol over Cu-Promoted Monomeric Fe/ZSM-5. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 6684–6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, T.; Li, Z.; Jones, W.; Liu, Y.S.; He, Q.; Song, W.Y.; Du, P.F.; Yang, B.; An, H.Y.; Farmer, D.M.; et al. Identifying Key Mononuclear Fe Species for Low-Temperature Methane Oxidation. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 3152–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dai, H.; Wang, J. Advances in Catalytic Oxidation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide (2nd Edition). Catalysts 2024, 14, 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14090642

AMA Style

Dai H, Wang J. Advances in Catalytic Oxidation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide (2nd Edition). Catalysts. 2024; 14(9):642. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14090642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dai, Hongxing, and Junhu Wang. 2024. "Advances in Catalytic Oxidation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide (2nd Edition)" Catalysts 14, no. 9: 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14090642

APA Style

Dai, H., & Wang, J. (2024). Advances in Catalytic Oxidation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide (2nd Edition). Catalysts, 14(9), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14090642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop