Next Article in Journal
Effect of Support Pretreatment Temperature on the Performance of an Iron Fischer–Tropsch Catalyst Supported on Silica-Stabilized Alumina
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Low Temperature NO Reduction Performance via MnOx-Fe2O3/Vermiculite Monolithic Honeycomb Catalysts
Previous Article in Journal
One-Pot Combination of Metal- and Bio-Catalysis in Water for the Synthesis of Chiral Molecules
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Performance of Modified Red Mud-Based Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/catal8020076
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 SCR Catalysts: Catalytic Activity, Stability and Interaction among Catalytic Oxides

by
Xuteng Zhao
1,
Lei Mao
1 and
Guojun Dong
1,2,*
1
School of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2
Key Laboratory of Superlight Material and Surface Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2018, 8(2), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8020076
Submission received: 28 January 2018 / Revised: 4 February 2018 / Accepted: 6 February 2018 / Published: 12 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite oxide catalysts with different molar ratios (active components/TiO2 = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6) have been prepared by wet impregnation method and tested in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH3 in a wide temperature range. These catalysts were also characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), in situ Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (in situ FTIR), H2-Temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results show the catalyst with a molar ratio of active components/TiO2 = 0.2 exhibits highest NO conversion value between 150 °C to 400 °C and good resistance to H2O and SO2 at 250 °C with a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) value of 40,000 h−1. Different oxides are well dispersed and interact with each other. NH3 and NO are strongly adsorbed on the catalyst surface and the adsorption of the reactant gas leads to a redox cycle with the valence state change among the surface oxides. The adsorption of SO2 on Mn4+ and Ce4+ results in good H2O and SO2 resistance of the catalyst, but the effect of Mn and Ce are more than superior water and sulfur resistance. The diversity of valence states of the four active components and their high oxidation-reduction performance are the main reasons for the high NO conversion in this system.

1. Introduction

The selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 in the presence of O2 has been widely used to control the emissions of NOx from mobile and stationary sources, such as coal-fired power plants and automobiles [1,2,3,4]. V2O5-WO3/TiO2 is the most used commercial catalyst for SCR of NOx at a relatively high temperature platform of 300 °C to 400 °C [5,6,7]. However, the drawbacks of this catalyst system cannot be ignored. The operating temperature window is narrow and it has low catalytic activity for deNOx at low temperature, for instance. Moreover, the catalytic performance can be seriously deactivated by H2O and SO2 in the emission [8,9,10]. Therefore, a low temperature catalyst with good resistance to SO2 and H2O is urgently needed for the SCR system to improve the situation.
So far, a lot of research has been done. Manganese-containing catalysts have attracted much attention due to their relatively high catalytic activity for the conversion of NOx at low temperature, including Ni-MnOx/TiO2 [6], MnOx-TiO2 [11,12], Cr-MnOx [13], Ce-MnOx [14,15] and Ca-MnOx/TiO2 [10]. Fang et al. [16] have compared the conversion of NO on MnOx/TiO2, MnOx/CNT and nano-flaky MnOx/CNT and found that nano-flaky MnOx/CNTs presents favourable stability, H2O resistance and better NO-SCR activity at a more extensive operating temperature window between 150 °C to 300 °C. However, SO2 leads to the irreversible deactivation of MnOx/TiO2 [9]. In recent years, it has been reported that Ce-based catalysts reveal excellent SCR activity in the presence of SO2 at 300–400 °C [17,18,19]. Yang and co-workers [18] have investigated the effect of SO2 on the SCR reaction over CeO2. The results have indicated that the adsorption of NH3 over CeO2 is obviously promoted with the sulfation of CeO2, resulting in an obvious promotion of the Eley–Rideal mechanism.
In many cases, one or two active components can hardly handle all the situations of the SCR system. In this work, four elements of manganese, cerium, vanadium and tungsten have been used as the active components, with a reduction in the amount of vanadium. Then, a series of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite oxide catalysts with different molar ratios of active components/TiO2 have been prepared by an impregnation method. In addition, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in situ Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) have been measured. The catalyst with a molar ratio of 0.2 exhibits the highest conversion of NO between 150 °C to 400 °C at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 40,000 h−1. This catalyst shows long lifetime and superior resistance to H2O and SO2 at 250 °C. It is remarkable to note that the catalyst is not deactivated at all. Moreover, the analysis results also prove that the oxides on the catalyst surface interact with each other and enhance the redox properties of the oxides and the adsorption of reaction gas, resulting in a redox cycle with the valence state change of the surface oxides. This is probably the main reason for its unique performance.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalytic Behavior

All SCR activity of catalysts have been tested several times and error analysis have been performed, shown in the form of error bars in the figures. Figure 1A shows the SCR performances of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite oxide catalysts with different molar ratios of active components/TiO2 = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6. For comparison, the SCR performances of V2O5/TiO2, WO3/TiO2, MnO2/TiO2, CeO2/TiO2 and TiO2 are given in Figure 1B. Compared with the single-component catalysts, composite catalysts show better catalytic activity. The NO conversion of all single component catalysts is less than 40% before 250 °C, while all Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite catalysts are more than 70% from 150 °C to 350 °C. Among them, the NO conversion of the catalyst with active components/TiO2 = 0.2 molar ratio is even above 90% from 150 °C to 400 °C. Obviously, the addition of various active components can significantly improve the catalytic activity. The similar condition has also been observed through evaluating the SCR performances of two/three-components catalysts (Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials). The catalytic activity of the three-components of MnO2-V2O5-WO3/TiO2 and CeO2-V2O5-WO3/TiO2 is significantly higher than that of reference catalysts. Furthermore, remarkably, the performance of CeO2-V2O5-WO3/TiO2 is better than MnO2-V2O5-WO3/TiO2, especially between 200 to 300 °C. It can be inferred that the effect of MnO2 and CeO2 on the V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst is different. Moreover, with temperature increasing, the SCR activity of the Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with the highest amount of loading decreases obviously, but others remain (shown in Figure 1A). It should also be mentioned that the catalyst with molar ratio of active components/TiO2 = 0.2 has the highest catalytic performance at 150 °C. Thus, the optimal molar ratio (Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 = 0.2) is obtained, and the catalytic performance will drop when the ratio is low or high, especially when it is high. These results may be due to the different dispersion of the active components on the support surface and the strong interaction among them. Further explanation will be elaborated in the following analyses.

2.2. XRD Analysis

The XRD patterns of the Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalysts are shown in Figure 2. The XRD diffractions of the catalyst with the molar ratio of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 = 0.1 are well indexed to anatase TiO2 (JCPDS 21-1272) [20,21], indicating that active components are well dispersed on the surface of support. When the molar ratio reaches 0.2, the active components on the surface of the support begins to aggregate, but no strong diffraction peaks of crystal phase appear. If the molar ratio continues to be increased to 0.6, crystalline phases of all active components appear and TiO2 peaks are diluted. The results are consistent with the SCR performances. Catalytic activity could be improved with the transition of active components from highly dispersed state to slightly aggregated state, yet a large amount of components’ aggregation will also decrease the catalytic activity [22].
XRD patterns of the reference catalysts are shown in Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials. It can be seen that the reference catalysts with a single component only have the diffraction peak of anatase TiO2. Interestingly, weak diffraction peaks of V2O5 and WO3 are observed at approximately 23.2° and 34.3° in the spectrum of V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst and 17.9°, 29.1°, 29.3° and 36.1° in the spectrum of MnO2-V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst, but the peaks of these angles disappear in the cerium containing systems; even the peaks of CeO2 and MnO2 have not appeared with the same molar ratio components added. The addition of Ce can be well dispersed, meanwhile, it can make other active components disperse more uniformly and avoid the large aggregation of active components on the support surface, which can make it easier for all active components to contact the reaction gas and improve the catalytic activity of this catalyst system.

2.3. TEM and HRTEM Analysis

TEM images of the catalyst with a molar ratio of 0.2 are presented in Figure 3. The diameter of the catalyst particle is about 20 nm (Figure 3a,b). It is similar to TiO2 support. The HRTEM micrographs (Figure 3c,d) display better defined contours, exhibiting higher crystalline order (Figure 3e–h). The d-spacing is measured at ca. 0.352 nm, ascribable to the (101) crystal planes of anatase TiO2. The detected spacing from different positions is the same, matching well with the XRD pattern. The result further indicates that active components are well dispersed on the surface. The addition of four active components occupy more positions on the surface of support, resulting in an increase of acidic sites exposed on the surface, which improves the ability of NH3 adsorption; this indirectly corresponds to the in situ FTIR test results of NH3 adsorption characteristic peak occurring at high temperature in the following.
High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) images of the reference catalysts with a molar ratio of 0.6 are presented in Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials. Compared with the former, HRTEM images of the 0.6-ratio catalyst show different diffraction fringes with different distances. Only the spacing of the representative lattice fringes and the corresponding crystal planes are shown and corresponding crystals of active components are detected, indicating that mass aggregation of active components have appeared on the support surface. The results are similar to XRD analysis, and specific information is presented in Supplementary Materials. However, there is no characteristic fringes of TiO2, indicating that TiO2 may be completely covered by the active components.

2.4. Catalyst Stability and H2O/SO2 Resistance

The catalyst with the best SCR performance has been selected for the stability and H2O/SO2 resistance tests. From the above information of activity tests, catalysts begin to remain stable at 250 °C, and the reaction may reach balance at this temperature. So, H2O/SO2 resistance and the 100 h stability test of the catalyst have been performed at 250 °C, as Figure 4 and Figure S4 in the Supplementary Materials present, respectively. It can be seen that the activity of the catalyst remains at about 95.3% during 100 h with small fluctuations, and no decline is observed, which indicates that the catalyst has a longer service life. Furthermore, it is obvious that the SCR activity maintains a very high NO conversion with small fluctuations when 5 vol % H2O, 100 ppm SO2 or both are introduced into the typical reactant gas. The same results have been obtained after repeating the test several times. It has been reported that MnO2, V2O5 and WO3 are easily irreversible deactivated by SO2; only CeO2 shows high activity in the presence of SO2 [6,7,9]. In this research, although MnO2 may still be attacked by SO2, the adulteration of CeO2 is significant to the catalyst for resisting the effect of SO2. The addition of these two elements makes V and W less affected by SO2 in the system. The result also indicates that the Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of active components/TiO2 = 0.2 has strong resistance to H2O and SO2. However, it cannot be assumed that the addition of Mn and Ce is simply attacked instead of V and W because the high NO conversion of the catalyst can still last a long time rather than being deactivated quickly in the presence of SO2 and H2O. There is a stronger interaction among the four active ingredients and the role of each element is crucial. Further investigations on the adsorption of reactive molecules and the effects of SO2 and H2O on the catalyst have been performed by in situ FTIR below.

2.5. In Situ FTIR Analysis

The adsorption, transformation and desorption of the reactant gas on the catalyst’s surface play an important role in the SCR reaction and they influence the reaction process. Under the condition of continuous exposure of typical reactant gas with or without SO2, the in situ FTIR spectra of the catalyst with a molar ratio of 0.2 are shown in Figure 5. Several bands at 975, 1208, 1437, 1596, 1670, 3164, 3260, 3353 and 3395 cm−1 are observed under the condition of continuous exposure of typical reactant gas without SO2 (shown in Figure 5a). The bands at 975 and 1670 cm−1 disappear over 150 °C, pointing to NH4+ species on Brønsted acid sites [23,24]. Then, ν(N−H) and δ(N−H) bands of NH3 adsorbed on Lewis sites at 1208 cm−1 and between 3100 and 3400 cm−1 are observed [25,26]. Additionally, the band at 1437 cm−1 weakens gradually with increasing temperature, but exists even at 400 °C. So, it should be assigned to the adsorption of the nitro specie on the catalyst surface [27]. Moreover, the band at 1596 cm−1 is attributed to the characteristic band of bridged nitrate species and it is not detected when the temperature is higher than 150 °C due to its poor stability. It can be concluded that NH3 and NO are strongly adsorbed on the catalyst surface even when the temperature reaches 400 °C, and the adsorption of NH3 on Lewis acid sites and NO have strong interaction with catalyst surface oxides. The strong interaction on the support surface promotes the strong adsorption of NH3 and the formation of nitrate species. At 400 °C, the activity of the catalyst remains at 90%, indicating that the catalyst still has a SCR reaction at this temperature. The results correspond well to the previous SCR activity test.
When SO2 is introduced into the typical reactant gas, several new bands at 986, 1141, 1213, 1276 and 1363 cm−1 have appeared (Figure 5b). The band at 1141 cm−1 is attributed to the stretching motion of adsorbed sulfate on the surface of the catalyst [1,28]. The bands at 986 and 1213 cm−1 are the shift of 975 and 1208 cm−1, due to their disappearance above 150 °C. However, the band at 1276 cm−1 turns up at 200 °C, which can be assigned to the follow-up shift of 1213 cm−1 [25,29,30]. At the same time, the band at 1363 cm−1 may stem from asymmetric vibration of S–O bands of ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4) and grows in intensity over temperature [9,29]. The results indicate that there is no competitive adsorption between SO2 and NO, and the adsorption of NH3 on the catalyst can be promoted by adsorbed sulfate. Nevertheless, though SO2 is surely adsorbed on the catalyst and sulfates are formed, the catalytic still maintains high activity, which is the same as before. It can be proposed that SO2 is only adsorbed on specific sites on the catalyst and Ce4+ may be one of the specific sites according to a previous report [18].

2.6. H2-TPR Analyses

To investigate the redox performance of the catalysts, H2-TPR and H2-TPR peak-differentiation-imitating of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst profiles have been obtained, as Figure 6 shows. Figure 6A are the H2-TPR curves of the catalysts. V2O5/TiO2 shows a strong reduction peak at 428 °C, corresponding to the vanadia species reduction of V5+→V3+ [31]. WO3/TiO2 shows two reduction peaks at 521 °C and 690 °C, and both of them are assigned to the reduction of W6+→W4+ [32]. MnO2/TiO2 displays a wide reduction peak at 367 °C ascribed to the reduction of MnO2 to Mn2O3 and Mn2O3 to Mn3O4 and a sharp reduction peak at 504 °C corresponds to the reduction of Mn3O4 to MnO [32,33,34]. The weak reduction peak for CeO2/TiO2 at 520 °C is caused by the reduction of low amount surface Ce4+→Ce3+ [7,32,35]. Though the reference catalysts show multiple peaks in the temperature range of 300 °C to 800 °C, only one wide peak appears in the H2-TPR profile of the catalyst with the molar ratio of 0.2 at 521 °C and peak shape is very wide, which is due to the overlapping of multiple peaks, even the possible interaction among oxides on the support surface.
To further investigate the important role of active components in the redox performance and the interaction among them, we have presented the H2-TPR peak-differentiation-imitating of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst in Figure 6B. Hydrogen consumption of single component catalysts and corresponding percent in composite catalysts have been listed in Table 1. Considering that the peak temperature of the WO3 and CeO2 is very close, peaks of the two oxides are unified into one peak here. The reduction peaks of one-component catalysts of V2O5 and MnO2 are larger than those of WO3 and CeO2. However, in the composite catalyst, the single peak of MnO2 and the overlap peak of CeO2 and WO3 are larger than the peak of V2O5, which is different from the redox properties of the four active components in the corresponding single-component catalysts. It can be inferred that the effect of Mn and Ce are more than superior water and sulfur resistance in the catalytic system. The interaction among the four active components enhances the redox properties of the oxides of the two elements. This can also be evidenced by the valence change of elements on the surface of the composite catalyst after H2 reduction in the XPS below. It is well known that WO3 acts as a promoter in traditional V2O5/WO3-TiO2 catalysts and contributes to the electron transfer among different valences of V element, which is also one of the main reasons for the high SCR activity of traditional catalysts; the oxide of Ce has a better ability to store and release oxygen. However, in the composite catalyst system, both the redox properties of Ce and W have been promoted, which shared part of the role of V2O5 with better redox ability in the catalytic activity. Therefore, both Ce and W contribute to the high NO conversion of the composite catalyst. The areas of reduction peaks of all oxides are different from the corresponding peaks of catalysts with a single component, which appeared in the case of the composite catalysts. The absolute amount of the four active components in the composite catalyst is less than that in the corresponding single-component catalysts, thus the hydrogen consumption of the four active components in the composite catalyst decreases. Among them, the reduction peaks of MnO2 and CeO2+WO3 are strong but the reduction peak of V is relatively weak. The reduction of hydrogen consumption of V2O5 should not be attributed to the strong interaction among active components causing inhibition on V2O5 redox properties, but rather to the fact that in the composite catalyst, the amount of V2O5 is less than that in the other three active components. According to XPS test results, there is still a large amount of V2O5 that has been reduced in the composite catalyst. It can be inferred that they all play major roles in the redox reaction.
The results of H2-TPR suggest that active components of the composite catalyst reveal characteristic redox properties, which is different from that of being alone, and the results indicate that the existence of a strong interaction among the active components on the surface of support is conducive to the promotion of reduction performance.

2.7. XPS Analysis

In the case of NO-SCR with NH3 over the composite oxide catalyst, the catalyst will take part in the reaction, which has been reported extensively [13,36,37]. In order to obtain the information about the oxidation states of the active components on the catalyst, V 2p, W 4f, Mn 2p, Ce 3d and O 1s XPS spectra of the catalysts are recorded as shown in Figure 7. According to the literature, two main peaks are attributed to V 2p3/2 and V 2p1/2 in the V 2p XPS spectra [38,39]. However, in this work, only the V 2p3/2 level can be used to distinguish vanadium oxide species in different chemical states, and the peak of V 2p1/2 is very weak and hindered by O 1s satellites. The peaks of the catalysts are separated into three peaks at the binding energies of 515.6, 516.3 and 516.8 eV, assigned to V3+, V4+ and V5+, respectively [40,41,42]. Two main peaks in the W 4f XPS spectra are due to W 4f7/2 and W 4f5/2, and the W 4f7/2 peak was divided into 34.6 (W5+) and 35.2 eV (W6+) and the W 4f5/2 peak is divided into 36.9 (W5+) and 37.7 eV (W6+), respectively [43,44]. Two main peaks assigned to Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2 are observed, and the Mn 2p3/2 peaks are separated into three peaks at the binding energies of 640.3 ± 0.2, 641.3 ± 0.2 and 642.6 ± 0.2 eV, corresponding to Mn2+, Mn3+ and Mn4+, respectively [1,36,45]. The Ce 3d XPS spectra can be fitted into ten peaks: 880.3, 885.9, 898.8 and 903.9 eV assigned to Ce3+ and 882.5, 888.8, 898.4, 901.0, 907.5 and 916.7 eV associated with Ce4+. The O 1s peak is fitted into two sub-bands, one at 529.6 eV and the other at 531.1 eV, which can be attributed to the lattice oxygen O2− and the surface adsorbed oxygen such as O22−, O−, O2− or OH−, respectively [13,46]. Compared with the XPS spectra of V 2p, W 4f and O 1s, Mn 2p and Ce 3d XPS spectra with the low intensity occur in 8 h using the composite catalyst with the molar ratio of 0.2 (shown in Figure 7C,D). The smaller nano-size and relative amount can lower the intensity of XPS spectra [45,47,48,49]. In this case, the low intensity can be attributed to sulfates covered on Mn and Ce species of the catalyst. Thus, the above conjecture that SO2 adsorbed only on specific sites on the catalyst is proved to some extent.
The quantitative analyses of V, W, Mn, Ce and O species on the catalysts from XPS spectra have been listed in Table 2. For comparison, the quantitative analysis of each element after H2 reduction has also been listed in Table 2. H2 for the reduction of the catalyst is complete. The XPS analysis after reduction of H2 shows that in the single-component catalysts, valence of V on the support surface is all converted from +5 to +3, and valence of Mn is also greatly converted from +4 to +2 and +3. Conversely, valence of W and Ce are relatively hard to be reduced, which proves the high redox properties of V and Mn compared to W and Ce as we know. However, the condition of valence change becomes different in the composite catalyst. It is easily determined that the proportion of different valence states of each element on a single active substance is quite different from those on the composite catalysts, which further indicates that the interaction exists among the oxides in the composite catalysts. The reduction of Mn increases, and the reduction of vanadium is only slightly reduced. It is worth noting that higher valence W and Ce are reduced, which is consistent with the result of H2-TPR above. Interestingly, compared to the single-component catalysts, the amount of oxygen adsorbed on the composite catalyst surface decrease. Through the TEM and HRTEM analysis, we know that the addition of four active components occupy more positions on the surface of support, resulting in an increase of acidic sites exposed on the surface, which can explain why the surface adsorption of oxygen decreases. Although there are references supporting that the increase of adsorbed oxygen can promote the SCR catalytic reaction, more importantly, the catalytic reaction involves a large number of electron transfer processes and it is clear that the diversity of valence states of the four active components and their high oxidation-reduction performance are the main reason for the high SCR performance in this system.
After the 100 h test, the concentration of O specie almost remains the same. Low valence state V and W species partly transform into the high valence state while high valence state Mn and Ce species partly convert into the low valence state. However, the change is faint, which corresponds with its superior stability. However, the concentrations of V, Mn, Ce and O species display a novel change compared with the fresh-catalyst after the 8 h H2O and SO2 resistance test. The concentration of Ce4+ decreases, which can be caused by SO2. As a reducing agent, SO2 induces a transformation from Ce4+ to Ce3+ on the surface, resulting in the formation of Ce2(SO4)3 [20]. The decline of Mn2+ concentration may be owing to the sulfation on Mn2+ bound by SO42− [50]. Furthermore, adsorption of H2O and SO2 on the sample can also affect the concentration of adsorbed oxygen, which makes it increase. Moreover, the increasing of V3+ concentration can be due to the enhanced adsorption of NH3 by the sulfation on the catalyst surface. It can be inferred that the addition of manganese and cerium reduced the adverse effects of SO2 on the catalytic activity owing to the result that SO2 molecules are only adsorbed on Ce4+ and Mn2+ species on the composite catalyst.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Catalysts Preparation

All the catalysts were prepared by wet impregnation method. As active components, Mn(CH3COO)2, NH4VO3, (NH4)10W12O41·xH2O (50 wt %) and Ce(NO3)3·6H2O with a molar ratio of 1:0.2:1:1 were completely dissolved in 60 mL citric acid solution (10 wt % C6H8O7·H2O) and TiO2 support powder was subsequently suspended in the obtained solution with the molar ratio of active components/TiO2 = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6, respectively. The obtained mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, then heated to 100 °C with stirring until the excess water was evaporated completely. The obtained solid was further dried at 120 °C for 12 h, and then calcined in air at 500 °C for 3 h. For comparison, V2O5/TiO2, WO3/TiO2, MnO2/TiO2, CeO2/TiO2, V2O5-WO3/TiO2, MnO2-CeO2/TiO2, MnO2-V2O5-WO3/TiO2 and CeO2-V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts with the same percentage content of corresponding active components were also prepared through the similar process.

3.2. NH3-SCR Activity Test

The SCR activity tests were carried out in a fixed-bed quartz reactor (0.3 mL catalyst; 40–60 mesh). The typical reactant gas composition contained: 1500 ppm NO, 1500 ppm NH3, 3% O2, 5 vol % H2O (when added), 100 ppm SO2 (when added) and balance Ar. The total gas flow rate was 200 mL/min and regulated by mass flow controllers (Sevenstar D08 series Flow Readout Boxed, Beijing Sevenstar Electronics Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), corresponding to the gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of about 40,000 h−1. The activity tests were examined at the temperature range of 100–400 °C. The NO outlet concentration was continuously monitored by the ThermoStar Gas Analysis System GSD320 analyzer (Pfeiffer Vacuum GmbH, Berlin, Germany).

3.3. Catalyst Characterization

XRD patterns were obtained using a D/MAX-3A Auto X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation. The X-ray source was operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The diffraction patterns were taken in the 2θ range of 10–90° at a scan speed of 15° min−1 and a resolution of 0.02°. TEM and HRTEM were performed on a FEI Teccai G2S-Twin electron microscope (PHILIPS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
X-ray photoelectron spectra were obtained with K-Alpha spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, America) using Al Kα (1486.7 eV) radiation as the excitation source with a precision of ±0.3 eV. All binding energies were referenced to the C 1s line at 284.6 eV.
H2-TPR were performed on a sp-6801 gas chromatograph analyzer (Shandong Lunan Ruihong Chemical Instrument Co., Ltd., Tengzhou, China) using 0.1 g catalyst. The sample was first pretreated in Ar (30 mL·min−1) at 50 °C for 1h and then heated up to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C·min−1 under 5 vol % H2/Ar. The consumption of H2 was measured by a thermal conductivity detector (TCD, BEIJING BUILDER ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Beijing, China).
In situ FTIR spectra were recorded by a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Nicolet 6700, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, America) equipped with a smart collector and MCT detector cooled by liquid N2, collecting 32 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1. The catalysts were firstly treated at 500 °C in Ar for 1 h, then cooled down to 50 °C. Subsequently, the SCR reactant gas were introduced to the catalyst for 30 min, and then flushed with Ar for 10 min. The spectra were normally collected at temperatures ranging from 50 °C to 400 °C in a continuous NH3 and NO flow. The background spectrum was recorded with the flowing of NH3 and NO and subtracted from the sample spectrum.

4. Conclusions

Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite oxide catalysts with the molar ratio of active components/TiO2 = 0.2, prepared by wet impregnation method, exhibit high NO conversion between 150 °C to 400 °C and good resistance to H2O and SO2 at 250 °C with a GHSV value of 40,000 h−1. Four active components are well dispersed on TiO2 surface and no crystalline phase is formed, but they can aggregate slightly, which is beneficial to the promotion of catalytic activity. NH3 and NO are strongly adsorbed on the catalyst surface even at 400 °C, indicating that the catalyst still has a SCR reaction at this temperature. SO2 is only adsorbed on Mn4+ and Ce4+ in this catalyst system, resulting in the formation of sulfates. However, the effect of Mn and Ce are more than superior water and sulfur resistance in the catalytic system. In addition, the characteristic redox properties of the catalyst are due to the existence of interaction among the active components on the support surface, and the interaction among them also enhances the redox properties of Ce and W oxides. Thus, all active components play major roles in the redox reaction, and the diversity of valence states of the four active components and their high oxidation-reduction performance are the main reason for the high SCR performance in this system.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/8/2/76/s1, Figure S1: SCR activity test of two/three-component catalysts, Figure S2: XRD analysis of reference catalysts, Figure S3: HRTEM images of the composite oxide catalysts, Figure S4: The lifetime of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with 0.2 molar ratio.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the central universities (HEUCF20136910012), Internationl Cooperation Special of The State Ministry of Science and Technology (2015DFR60380) and Advanced Technique Project Funds of The Manufacture and Information Ministry. And we thank Zhijuan Zhao and Xiaoyu Zhang from Analysis and Test Center of Chinese Sciences Academy Institute of Chemistry for their help in XPS.

Author Contributions

Guojun Dong conceived and designed the experiments; Xuteng Zhao performed the experiments; Lei Mao contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Xuteng Zhao and Lei Mao analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Park, E.; Kim, M.; Jung, H.; Chin, S.; Jurng, J. Effect of Sulfur on Mn/Ti Catalysts Prepared Using Chemical Vapor Condensation (CVC) for Low-Temperature NO Reduction. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1518–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Boudali, L.K.; Ghorbel, A.; Grange, P. SCR of NO by NH3 over V2O5 supported sulfated Ti-pillared clay: Reactivity and reducibility of catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 2006, 305, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lónyi, F.; Solt, H.E.; Pászti, Z.; Valyon, J. Mechanism of NO-SCR by methane over Co,H-ZSM-5 and Co,H-mordenite catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 150–151, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Nicosia, D.; Czekaj, I.; Kröcher, O. Chemical deactivation of V2O5/WO3-TiO2 SCR catalysts by additives and impurities from fuels, lubrication oils and urea solution. Appl. Catal. B 2008, 77, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Si, Z.; Weng, D.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Li, G. Structure, acidity and activity of CuOx/WOx-ZrO2 catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. J. Catal. 2010, 271, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thirupathi, B.; Smirniotis, P.G. Nickel-doped Mn/TiO2 as an efficient catalyst for the low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3: Catalytic evaluation and characterizations. J. Catal. 2012, 288, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, L.; Li, J.; Ge, M. Promotional Effect of Ce-doped V2O5-WO3/TiO2 with Low Vanadium Loadings for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 21177–21184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xie, G.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Ge, J.; Huang, Z. Simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx from flue gas using a CuO/Al2O3 catalyst sorbentII. Promotion of SCR activity by SO2 at high temperatures. J. Catal. 2014, 224, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pan, S.; Luo, H.; Li, L.; Wei, Z.; Huang, B. H2O and SO2 deactivation mechanism of MnOx/MWCNTs for low-temperature SCR of NOx with NH3. J. Mol. Catal. A 2013, 377, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tian, Q.; Liu, H.; Yao, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Weng, X. SO2 Poisoning Behaviors of Ca-Mn/TiO2 Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 at Low Temperature. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, J.; Fang, D.; He, F.; Chen, J.; Fu, Z.; Chen, X. Performance and mechanism about MnOx species included in MnOx/TiO2 catalysts for SCR at low temperature. Catal. Commun. 2012, 28, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ettireddy, P.R.; Ettireddy, N.; Boningari, T.; Pardemann, R.; Smirniotis, P.G. Investigation of the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia over Mn/TiO2 catalysts through transient isotopic labeling and in situ FT-IR studies. J. Catal. 2012, 292, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, Z.; Yang, Q.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Tsang, S.C. Cr–MnOx mixed-oxide catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperature. J. Catal. 2010, 276, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Shi, L.; Fang, C.; Li, H.; Gao, R.; Huang, L.; Zhang, J. In situ supported MnO(x)-CeO(x) on carbon nanotubes for the low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, L.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, J.; Cai, S.; Fang, C.; Huang, L.; Li, H.; Gao, R.; Shi, L. Design of meso-TiO2@MnO(x)-CeO(x)/CNTs with a core-shell structure as DeNO(x) catalysts: Promotion of activity, stability and SO2-tolerance. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9821–9829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fang, C.; Zhang, D.; Cai, S.; Zhang, L.; Huang, L.; Li, H.; Maitarad, P.; Shi, L.; Gao, R.; Zhang, J. Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over nanoflaky MnOx on carbon nanotubes in situ prepared via a chemical bath deposition route. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9199–9207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jin, R.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cen, W.; Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Weng, X. The role of cerium in the improved SO2 tolerance for NO reduction with NH3 over Mn-Ce/TiO2 catalyst at low temperature. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 148–149, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, S.; Guo, Y.; Chang, H.; Ma, L.; Peng, Y.; Qu, Z.; Yan, N.; Wang, C.; Li, J. Novel effect of SO2 on the SCR reaction over CeO2: Mechanism and significance. Appl. Catal. B 2013, 136–137, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Fang, C.; Gao, R.; Qian, Y.; Shi, L.; Zhang, J. MnOx–CeOx/CNTs pyridine-thermally prepared via a novel in situ deposition strategy for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 8811–8819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shu, Y.; Aikebaier, T.; Quan, X.; Chen, S.; Yu, H. Selective catalytic reaction of NOx with NH3 over Ce-Fe/TiO2-loaded wire-mesh honeycomb: Resistance to SO2 poisoning. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 150–151, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thirupathi, B.; Smirniotis, P.G. Co-doping a metal (Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ce, and Zr) on Mn/TiO2 catalyst and its effect on the selective reduction of NO with NH3 at low-temperatures. Appl. Catal. B 2011, 110, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, F.; Zhuang, K.; Yang, F.; Yang, L.; Xu, B.; Qiu, J.; Fan, Y. Effect of Dispersion State and Surface Properties of Supported Vanadia on the Activity of V2O5/TiO2, Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO by NH3. Chin. J. Catal. 2012, 33, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhong, Q. Effect of nitrogen doping on oxygen vacancies of titanium dioxide supported vanadium pentoxide for ammonia-SCR reaction at low temperature. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 402, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, Z.; Jiang, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Jin, R. DRIFT Study of Manganese/Titania-Based Catalysts for Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5812–5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Larrubia, M.A.; Ramis, G.; Busca, G. An FT-IR study of the adsorption of urea and ammonia over V2O5-MoO3-TiO2 SCR catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2000, 27, L145–L151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, L.; Li, J.; Ge, M. DRIFT Study on Cerium-Tungsten/Titiania Catalyst for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 9590–9596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mihaylov, M.; Chakarova, K.; Hadjiivanov, K. Formation of carbonyl and nitrosyl complexes on titania-and zirconia-supported nickel: FTIR spectroscopy study. J. Catal. 2004, 228, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, L.; Li, X.; Hao, C.; Raston, C.L. SO2 adsorption and transformation on calcined NiAl hydrotalcite-like compounds surfaces: An in situ FTIR and DFT study. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 117–118, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, F.; Asakura, K.; He, H.; Shan, W.; Shi, X.; Zhang, C. Influence of sulfation on iron titanate catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Appl. Catal. B 2011, 103, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vargas, M.A.L.; Casanova, M.; Trovarelli, A.; Busca, G. An IR study of thermally stable V2O5-WO3-TiO2 SCR catalysts modified with silica and rare-earths (Ce, Tb, Er). Appl. Catal. B 2007, 75, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, W.; Wu, X.; Si, Z.; Weng, D. Influences of impregnation procedure on the SCR activity and alkali resistance of V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 283, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, H.; Li, J.; Yuan, J.; Chen, L.; Dai, Y.; Arandiyan, H.; Xu, J.; Hao, J. Ge, Mn-doped CeO2-WO3 catalysts for NH3-SCR of NOx: Effects of SO2 and H2 regeneration. Catal. Today 2013, 201, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Q.; Yang, H.; Nie, A.; Fan, X.; Zhang, X. Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 over V2O5-MnOX/TiO2-Carbon Nanotube Composites. Catal. Lett. 2011, 141, 1237–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Song, W.; Chen, J.; Li, T.; Feng, Z. Synergetic Promotional Effects Between Cerium Oxides and Manganese Oxides for NH3-Selective Catalyst Reduction Over Ce-Mn/TiO2. Mater. Express 2011, 1, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cen, W.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Weng, X. A theoretic insight into the catalytic activity promotion of CeO2 surfaces by Mn doping. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 5769–5777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wan, Y.; Zhao, W.; Tang, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, H.; Cui, Y.; Gu, J.; Li, Y.; Shi, J. Ni-Mn bi-metal oxide catalysts for the low temperature SCR removal of NO with NH3. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 148–149, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, S.; Wang, C.; Chen, J.; Peng, Y.; Ma, L.; Chang, H.; Chen, L.; Liu, C.; Xu, J.; Li, J.; et al. A novel magnetic Fe-Ti-V spinel catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 in a broad temperature range. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 915–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gao, R.; Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Shi, L.; Maitarad, P.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Cao, W. Enhanced catalytic performance of V2O5-WO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 microspheres for selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nefzi, H.; Sediri, F. Vanadium oxide nanotubes VOx-NTs: Hydrothermal synthesis, characterization, electrical study and dielectric properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2013, 201, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, X.; Bartholomew, C.; Hecker, W.; Baxter, L.L. Effects of sulfate species on V2O5/TiO2 SCR catalysts in coal and biomass-fired systems. Appl. Catal. B 2009, 92, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boningari, T.; Koirala, R.; Smirniotis, P.G. Low-temperature catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 over vanadia-based nanoparticles prepared by flame-assisted spray pyrolysis: Influence of various supports. Appl. Catal. B 2013, 140–141, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, S.; Wang, C.; Ma, L.; Peng, Y.; Qu, Z.; Yan, N.; Chen, J.; Chang, H.; Li, J. Substitution of WO3 in V2O5/WO3-TiO2 by Fe2O3 for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Digregorio, F. Activation and isomerization of hydrocarbons over WO3/ZrO2 catalysts: I. Preparation, characterization, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies. J. Catal. 2004, 225, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nishiguchi, T.; Oka, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Kanai, H.; Utani, K.; Imamura, S. Durability of WO3/ZrO2-CuO/CeO2 catalysts for steam reforming of dimethyl ether. Appl. Catal. A 2006, 301, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, L.; Huang, B.; Su, Y.; Zhou, G.; Wang, K.; Luo, H.; Ye, D. Manganese oxides supported on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3: Catalytic activity and characterization. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 192, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shan, W.; Liu, F.; He, H.; Shi, X.; Zhang, C. A superior Ce-W-Ti mixed oxide catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 115–116, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Luo, Z.; Cen, K. The activity and characterization of CeO2-TiO2 catalysts prepared by the sol-gel method for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174, 734–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, X.; Shi, A.; Duan, Y.; Wang, J.; Shen, M. Catalytic performance and hydrothermal durability of CeO2-V2O5-ZrO2/WO3-TiO2 based NH3-SCR catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 1386–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Q.; Hou, X.; Yang, H.; Ma, Z.; Zheng, J.; Liu, F.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, Z. Promotional effect of CeOX for NO reduction over V2O5/TiO2-carbon nanotube composites. J. Mol. Catal. A 2012, 356, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, S.; Qi, F.; Liao, Y.; Xiong, S.; Lan, Y.; Fu, Y.; Shan, W.; Li, J. Dual Effect of Sulfation on the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 over MnOx/TiO2: Key Factor of NH3 Distribution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 5810–5819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 08 00076 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) activity of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite catalysts with the molar ratio of active components/TiO2 at different values: (a) 0.1; (b) 0.2; (c) 0.3; (d) 0.6. (B) SCR activity of V2O5/TiO2, WO3/TiO2, MnO2/TiO2, CeO2/TiO2 and TiO2. Reaction conditions: [NO] = [NH3] = 1500 ppm, [O2] = 3%, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 40,000 h−1.
Figure 1. (A) Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) activity of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite catalysts with the molar ratio of active components/TiO2 at different values: (a) 0.1; (b) 0.2; (c) 0.3; (d) 0.6. (B) SCR activity of V2O5/TiO2, WO3/TiO2, MnO2/TiO2, CeO2/TiO2 and TiO2. Reaction conditions: [NO] = [NH3] = 1500 ppm, [O2] = 3%, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 40,000 h−1.
Catalysts 08 00076 g001
Catalysts 08 00076 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite oxide catalysts with different molar ratio of active components/TiO2: (a) 0.1; (b) 0.2; (c) 0.3; (d) 0.6.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite oxide catalysts with different molar ratio of active components/TiO2: (a) 0.1; (b) 0.2; (c) 0.3; (d) 0.6.
Catalysts 08 00076 g002
Catalysts 08 00076 g003 550
Figure 3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) images of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2: (a,b) TEM images; (c,d) HRTEM images; (e,f) amplified images of (c); (g,h) amplified images of (d).
Figure 3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) images of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2: (a,b) TEM images; (c,d) HRTEM images; (e,f) amplified images of (c); (g,h) amplified images of (d).
Catalysts 08 00076 g003
Catalysts 08 00076 g004 550
Figure 4. H2O and SO2 resistance of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2 at 250 °C: insert (a–c) H2O and SO2 resistance. Reaction conditions: [NO] = [NH3] = 1500 ppm, [O2] = 3%, [H2O] = 5%, [SO2] = 100 ppm, GHSV = 40,000 h−1.
Figure 4. H2O and SO2 resistance of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2 at 250 °C: insert (a–c) H2O and SO2 resistance. Reaction conditions: [NO] = [NH3] = 1500 ppm, [O2] = 3%, [H2O] = 5%, [SO2] = 100 ppm, GHSV = 40,000 h−1.
Catalysts 08 00076 g004
Catalysts 08 00076 g005 550
Figure 5. In situ Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (in situ FTIR) spectra of the catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2 under the condition of continuous exposure of typical reactant gas with or without SO2: (a) without SO2; (b) with SO2.
Figure 5. In situ Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (in situ FTIR) spectra of the catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2 under the condition of continuous exposure of typical reactant gas with or without SO2: (a) without SO2; (b) with SO2.
Catalysts 08 00076 g005
Catalysts 08 00076 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) H2-Temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) profiles of the catalysts: (a) V2O5/TiO2; (b) WO3/TiO2; (c) MnO2/TiO2; (d) CeO2/TiO2; (e) Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2. (B) H2-TPR peak-differentiation-imitating of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst: (e) Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2; (f) the oxides of V; (g) the oxides of Mn; (h) the oxides of W and Ce.
Figure 6. (A) H2-Temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) profiles of the catalysts: (a) V2O5/TiO2; (b) WO3/TiO2; (c) MnO2/TiO2; (d) CeO2/TiO2; (e) Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2. (B) H2-TPR peak-differentiation-imitating of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst: (e) Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2; (f) the oxides of V; (g) the oxides of Mn; (h) the oxides of W and Ce.
Catalysts 08 00076 g006
Catalysts 08 00076 g007 550
Figure 7. V 2p (A); W 4f (B); Mn 2p (C); Ce 3d (D) and O 1s (E) XPS spectra of the catalysts: (a) V2O5/TiO2; (b) Fresh-catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2; (c) 8 h used-catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2; (d) 100 h used-catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2; (e) WO3/TiO2; (f) MnO2/TiO2; (g) CeO2/TiO2.
Figure 7. V 2p (A); W 4f (B); Mn 2p (C); Ce 3d (D) and O 1s (E) XPS spectra of the catalysts: (a) V2O5/TiO2; (b) Fresh-catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2; (c) 8 h used-catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2; (d) 100 h used-catalyst with molar ratio of 0.2; (e) WO3/TiO2; (f) MnO2/TiO2; (g) CeO2/TiO2.
Catalysts 08 00076 g007
Table
Table 1. Hydrogen consumption of single component catalysts and corresponding percent in composite catalyst.
Table 1. Hydrogen consumption of single component catalysts and corresponding percent in composite catalyst.
Catalysts
V2O5/TiO2WO3/TiO2MnO2/TiO2CeO2/TiO2Composite CatalystPeak of V2O5Peak of MnO2Peak of WO3 + CeO2
Hydrogen consumption (μmol/g)90.2733.01126.2422.8999.019.4443.0940.02
Table
Table 2. The percent of different valence states for V 2p, W 4f, Mn 2p, Ce 3d and O 1s.
Table 2. The percent of different valence states for V 2p, W 4f, Mn 2p, Ce 3d and O 1s.
CatalystsPercent of Valence State, %
V 2pW 4fMn 2pCe 3dO 1s
V3+V4+V5+W5+W6+Mn2+Mn3+Mn4+Ce3+Ce4+Lattice OxygenAdsorbed Oxygen
V2O5/TiO232.427.140.5-------60.040.0
V2O5/TiO2 **10000-------53.546.5
WO3/TiO2---20.779.3-----58.841.2
WO3/TiO2 **---46.853.2-----58.441.6
MnO2/TiO2-----3.952.743.5--68.731.3
MnO2/TiO2 **-----22.36116.7--28.171.9
CeO2/TiO2--------40.359.780.419.6
CeO2/TiO2 **--------46.153.963.536.5
Composite catalyst *7.518.374.228.871.210.834.055.245.354.792.77.3
Composite catalyst **79.93.616.5544635.450.214.460.639.478.921.1
Composite catalyst ***14.115.970.024.275.86.930.862.357.342.780.219.8
Composite catalyst ****7.99.083.110.889.218.338.543.247.352.792.57.5
* Fresh; ** After hydrogen reduction; *** 8 h used for resistance to H2O and SO2; ***** 100 h used for stability test.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Mao, L.; Dong, G. Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 SCR Catalysts: Catalytic Activity, Stability and Interaction among Catalytic Oxides. Catalysts 2018, 8, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8020076

AMA Style

Zhao X, Mao L, Dong G. Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 SCR Catalysts: Catalytic Activity, Stability and Interaction among Catalytic Oxides. Catalysts. 2018; 8(2):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8020076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xuteng, Lei Mao, and Guojun Dong. 2018. "Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 SCR Catalysts: Catalytic Activity, Stability and Interaction among Catalytic Oxides" Catalysts 8, no. 2: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8020076

APA Style

Zhao, X., Mao, L., & Dong, G. (2018). Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 SCR Catalysts: Catalytic Activity, Stability and Interaction among Catalytic Oxides. Catalysts, 8(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8020076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop