Next Article in Journal
Impediment of Iron Corrosion by N,N′-Bis[2-hydroxynaphthylidene]amino]oxamide in 3.5% NaCl Solution
Next Article in Special Issue
Sequence Analysis and Preliminary X-ray Crystallographic Analysis of an Acetylesterase (LgEstI) from Lactococcus garvieae
Previous Article in Journal
Kappa Carbide Precipitation in Duplex Fe-Al-Mn-Ni-C Low-Density Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Depth-Dependent Mechanical Behavior of Anisotropic Native and Cross-Linked HheG Enzyme Crystals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Structural and Biochemical Studies of Bacillus subtilis MobB

1
Department of Life Science, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea
2
Macrogen Inc., Seoul 08511, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(10), 1262; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101262
Submission received: 14 September 2021 / Revised: 11 October 2021 / Accepted: 15 October 2021 / Published: 18 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crystallographic Studies of Enzymes (Volume II))

Abstract

:
The biosynthesis of molybdenum cofactor for redox enzymes is carried out by multiple enzymes in bacteria including MobA and MobB. MobA is known to catalyze the attachment of GMP to molybdopterin to form molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide. MobB is a GTP binding protein that enhances the activity of MobA by forming the MobA:MobB complex. However, the mechanism of activity enhancement by MobB is not well understood. The structure of Bacillus subtilis MobB was determined to 2.4 Å resolution and it showed an elongated homodimer with an extended β-sheet. Bound sulfate ions were observed in the Walker A motifs, indicating a possible phosphate-binding site for GTP molecules. The binding assay showed that the affinity between B. subtilis MobA and MobB increased in the presence of GTP, suggesting a possible role of MobB as an enhancer of MobA activity.

1. Introduction

Molybdenum is an essential trace element required in diverse redox reactions in bacteria and eukaryotes [1]. A basic molybdenum cofactor (Moco) is a form in which the molybdenum atom is coordinated to the dithiolate moiety of a tricyclic pterin, called Molybdopterin (MPT) [2]. Moco biosynthesis is carried out by a conserved pathway with multiple steps (Figure 1): first, the formation of cyclic pyranopterin monophosphate from guanosine triphosphate (GTP) [3], followed by the insertion of two sulfur atoms to form MPT [4,5], and then the addition of a molybdenum atom to form molybdenum cofactor (Moco) via MPT-AMP intermediates [6,7,8,9,10]. In many bacteria, additional modifications of Moco occur by the attachment of guanosine monophosphate (GMP) or cytosine monophosphate (CMP) to form MPT guanine dinucleotide (MGD) [11] or MPT cytosine dinucleotide (MCD) [12], respectively. Two MGDs can be ligated to a single molybdenum atom, forming the bis-MGD cofactor, a reaction catalyzed by MobA and MobB proteins [13]. MobA is crucial for this reaction and MobB, a GTP-binding protein with weak intrinsic GTPase activity [14], enhances the function of MobA by forming the MobA:MobB complex as shown by an increased activity of nitrate reductase that requires bis-MGD as a cofactor [11]. B. subtilis MobB consists of 173 amino acids with a molecular weight of 19.5 KDa. Homologous structures of B. subtilis MobB include Geobacillus stearothermophilus (PDB ID: 1XJC), Archaeoglobus fulgid (2F1R), and Escherichia coli MobB (1NP6) with sequence identities of 40.6, 31.1 and 25.2% to B. subtilis MobB, respectively.
Our crystal structure of B. subtilis MobB showed that it formed an elongated homodimer. Each subunit contained a Walker A motif for binding the phosphate group of GTP, where a bound sulfate ion from crystallization solution was observed. It was shown that MobB interacts with MobA in vivo using a bacterial two-hybrid system [15], and the model of the MobA:MobB complex structure suggested that GTP was bound in the MobA:MobB interface [16]. We performed binding assays using B. subtilis MobA and MobB, which showed that these two proteins interacted more strongly in the presence of GTP in agreement with the suggested MobA:MobB complex model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cloning, Expression, and Purification

The mobB gene was amplified from B. subtilis genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers (5′-GCTAGCATGGCCTTGGTCCGTCCTTTC-3′, 5′-GAATTCTTATGCAGATTCCCCCTTCAGC-3′). The purified PCR product was cloned using NheI and EcoRI enzymes into the pET28b vector with an N-terminal His6-tag and thrombin site. The construct was then transformed into BL21(DE3) E. coli strain (Novagen). The cells were cultured in LB media containing 30 µg/mL of kanamycin at 310 K until an OD600 of 0.6. The temperature was lowered to 291 K, followed by induction with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Cell growth continued for 16 h, after which cells were harvested by centrifugation. Cell pellets were then resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and 250 mM NaCl buffer (lysis buffer) and lysed by sonication. The lysate was cleared by centrifugation, after which the supernatant was loaded onto a Ni-sepharose 6 affinity column (GE Healthcare) and eluted by a stepwise gradient of 50–800 mM imidazole in lysis buffer. After the N-terminal His6-tag from the protein was cut by thrombin at 277 K for 16 h, MobB was further purified using a Superdex75 size-exclusion column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with a buffer composed of 20 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 2 mM EDTA. The purity of the protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and the yield was about 2 mg from 1L culture. MobB proteins were concentrated by centrifugal ultrafiltration (Amicon, mol. wt. cutoff = 5 kDa) to 10 mg/mL as measured by Bradford assay (Thermo scientific).

2.2. Crystallization, Data Collection, and Structure Determination

Crystals of B. subtilis MobB were obtained by the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method performed at 293 K by mixing 1 µL of protein with 1 µL of a well solution containing 23% (w/v) polyethyleneglycol (PEG) 3350 and 0.4 M ammonium sulfate. The protein used for crystallization is residues 1-173 of B. subtilis MobB (sequence ID: O31704) with amino acids “GSHMAS” left on the N-terminus from the vector. The crystals were rod-shaped and reached full size after 3 days. Crystals were transferred into a cryoprotectant solution composed of 25% (w/v) PEG 3350, 0.4 M ammonium sulfate, and 20% glycerol and then flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected to 2.4 Å resolution at the PAL beamline 5C (KOREA). Data were processed using HKL-2000 [17] and the initial model was obtained by molecular replacement using the Phaser program [18] of the CCP4 package [19] with G. stearothermophilus MobB structure (1XJC) as a search model. The space group was C2 and the asymmetric unit contained five subunits in which subunit B formed a homodimer with subunit E, and C with D. Subunit A formed a homodimer with its 2-fold crystallographic symmetry-related molecule. The Matthews’ coefficient (Vm) was 2.19 Å3/Da, and the estimated solvent content was 43.8%. The model was refined with the Refmac [20,21] and PHENIX programs [22], and manual model building was performed using Coot software [23]. Data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1. Residues that were poorly observed in the electron density maps were not included in the final model (residues 1–6, 45–59, and 170–173 in A, C, and D subunits; residues 1–5, 45–59, and 173 in the B subunit; and residues 1–6, 45–59 and 172–173 in the E subunit). The Ramachandran plot produced by MolProbity [24] showed that 100% of residues were in the allowed or favored region. The coordinates and structure factors for B. subtilis MobB have been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank with accession code 4OYH.

2.3. MobA Preparation and MobA:MobB Binding Assay

The mobA gene was amplified from B. subtilis genomic DNA by PCR using primers (5′-TACTTCCAATCCAATGCAATGAAGCATATAAA-TGTACTGCT-3′, 5′-TTATCCACTTCCAATGTTATTATCAGTCCCACCTGAAGGAG-3′). The purified PCR product was cloned into a pLIC-Tr3Ta-HA vector containing an N-terminal His6-tag and a TEV protease cleavage site. The construct was then transformed into BL21(DE3) E. coli strain (Novagen). MobA protein was expressed and purified using the same protocol as MobB described above. MobA:MobB binding assay was performed using the BLItz instrument (fortebio) and a Ni-NTA biosensor. BLItz system uses a bio-layer interferometry technology that can detect the change of the thickness of the coating on the biosensor that is proportional to the number of bound molecules [25]. BLItz system measures the association (kon) and dissociation (koff) rate constants to obtain KD value (=kon/koff). All proteins were prepared to 2 mg/mL in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and 250 mM NaCl. MobA contained an N-terminal His6-tag, whereas MobB did not contain a His6-tag. After MobA with a His6-tag was bound to the Ni-NTA sensor, the binding of MobB to MobA was monitored. Binding assays were performed in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and 250 mM NaCl ± 0.5 mM dGTP. Binding assay data were analyzed using BLItz Pro software version 1.1 to calculate KD values.

3. Results and Discussions

The structure of B. subtilis MobB was determined at 2.4 Å resolution and refined to final Rwork (Rfree) values of 21.0% (30.3%). There were 5 subunits (two and a half dimers) in the asymmetric unit, and they had similar structures with RMSD’s of 0.673, 0.991, 1.10, and 0.708 Å, respectively, compared to the A subunit when 148 Cα carbons are superposed. B. subtilis MobB formed a homodimer and each subunit consisted of six α-helices and eight β-strands (Figure 2A). B. subtilis MobB was eluted from the Superdex75 size-exclusion column (GE Healthcare) close to 60 kDa based on the calibration curve, and there were no peaks close to its monomer size (19.5 kDa) (Figure S1, in Supplementary Materials). Although this calculated MW of 60 kDa is closer to the trimeric form of MobB (58.5 kDa), we believe this peak corresponds to an elongated dimer of MobB, as observed in the crystal structure (Figure 2A). Interestingly, eight β-strands of subunit A and eight β-strands of subunit B (denoted with ’) formed a contiguous β-sheet composed of 16 β-strands. β-sheets at the ends (β8-β7-β6-β1 and β1’-β6’-β7’-β8’) were more twisted than the central part (β5-β2-β3’-β4’-β4-β3-β2’-β5’) of this contiguous β-sheet. Two molecules of MobB formed a closely intertwined homodimer with a dimer interface formed mainly by six β-strands (β2-β3’-β4’-β4-β3-β2’) in the center of the structure and α-helices (α2 and α3 from subunit A and α2’ and α3’ from subunit B) on both sides of the sheet (Figure 2A).
Analysis of the dimer interface using the PISA program [26] showed that the buried surface area was 2371 Å2, which is about 21% of the total surface area of each monomer. There were 34 hydrogen bonds and three ionic interactions found in the dimer interface. Interactions from the inter-subunit β-sheet (β2-β3’, β4’-β4, and β3-β2’) contributed 18 hydrogen bonds to the interface. B. subtilis MobB showed similar structures to its homologs with known structures including G. stearothermophilus (PDB ID: 1XJC), A. fulgid (2F1R), and E. coli MobB (1NP6) [16], with RMSD’s of 1.15, 2.39, and 3.32 Å, respectively (Figure S2, in Supplementary Materials). All of them formed a homodimer with a central β-sheet forming the major dimerization interface.
B. subtilis MobB protein contains a phosphate-binding site composed of a conserved Walker A motif (also known as the P-loop) [27] at the N-terminal region (GFQNSGKTT) (Figure 3C). A bound sulfate ion, used in the crystallization solution was observed in this motif in all subunits in the asymmetric unit (Figure 3A). The average B-factor of all sulfate ions is 75.1 Å2 with occupancies set to 1. For comparison, the average B-factors of all protein atoms and water molecules are 54.8 and 69.6 Å2, respectively. Oxygen atoms of the sulfate group were hydrogen-bonded to the amide nitrogen atoms of N20, S21, G22, and K23. The side chains of K23 and T24 also formed hydrogen bonds with the oxygen atoms of the sulfate group. Among these residues, G22, K23, and T24 were completely conserved in the multiple sequence alignments of MobB homologs (Figure 3C). Bound sulfate ions have been observed previously in the Walker A motif of E. coli MobB [16], where it was interacting with the amide groups of G16, G18, K19, and T20 (corresponding to N20, G22, K23, and T24 of B. subtilis MobB) in a similar manner to B. subtilis MobB. Another bound sulfate ion was observed in a nearby region, hydrogen-bonded to the amide groups of F111 and K112 of B. subtilis MobB, (Figure 3B) in all of the five subunits in the asymmetric unit. Although these two residues are identical in E. coli and B. subtilis MobB (Figure 3C, indicated by an asterisk), sulfate ion was not observed at this position in E. coli MobB, probably because the conformations of the amide groups are different from each other. Examination of the electrostatic potential surface of MobB dimer calculated by PyMOL [28] showed that both sulfate binding sites of B. subtilis MobB were predominantly positively charged (Figure 2B). Bound sulfate ions were not observed in the case of other homologs such as A. fulgid and G. stearothermophilus MobB either in the Walker A motif or the second sulfate binding site. This is probably because sulfate ion was not included in the crystallization condition.
MobA catalyzes the transfer of GMP to MPT to form MGD. This reaction is enhanced in the presence of MobB by forming a MobA:MobB complex [11]. We cloned the MobA gene from the B. subtilis genome and measured the binding affinity between MobA and MobB using the BLItz system. The dissociation constant (KD) was 12.2 µM in the presence of 0.5 mM GTP and 27.3 µM in the absence of GTP (Figure 4). The model of MobA:MobB complex suggested that both MobA and MobB bind GTP [16] and the GTP-dependence of MobA:MobB binding affinity seems to support this model. We also observed that MobA precipitated quickly in the absence of MobB and became more stable when mixed with MobB during the purification process, suggesting the formation of a MobA:MobB complex.
In summary, the crystal structure of B. subtilis MobB showed that it formed a tightly bound homodimer with a bound sulfate ion in the Walker A motif. A second sulfate ion was observed in the vicinity of the first sulfate ion, which is unique to B. subtilis MobB. The binding affinity between MobA:MobB was increased in the presence of GTP, supporting the model that GTP is bound by both MobA and MobB during complex formation. We believe our structural and biochemical studies of MobB provide insight into the role of MobB as an enhancer of MobA by binding GTP molecule in the MobA and MobB interface. Future study of MobA:MobB complex structure with bound GTP will provide detailed information to understand the mechanism of MobB function.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cryst11101262/s1, Figure S1: Superdex75 size-exclusion column profile of B. subtilis MobB (blue) and calibration standards (green). The molecular weights of the standard proteins are indicated in kDa; Figure S2: The structure of B. subtilis MobB (green) is superposed to (A) G. stearothermophilus (or-ange), (B) A. fulgid (blue), and (C) E. coli MobB (magenta).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.; data acquisition and analysis, D.K., S.C. and H.K.; writing, D.K. and J.C.; project administration, J.C.; funding acquisition, J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018R1D1A1A09083579).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: [https://www.rcsb.org (PDB ID:4OYH)].

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff members of Pohang Synchrotron Laboratory (PAL) beamline 5C for data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hille, R. The mononuclear molybdenum enzymes. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2757–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rajagopalan, K.V.; Johnson, J.L. The pterin molybdenum cofactors. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 10199–10202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hover, B.M.; Loksztejn, A.; Ribeiro, A.A.; Yokoyama, K. Identification of a Cyclic Nucleotide as a Cryptic Intermediate in Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7019–7032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gutzke, G.; Fischer, B.; Mendel, R.R.; Schwarz, G. Thiocarboxylation of molybdopterin synthase provides evidence for the mechanism of dithiolene formation in metal-binding pterins. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 36268–36274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Rudolph, M.J.; Wuebbens, M.M.; Turque, O.; Rajagopalan, K.V.; Schindelin, H. Structural studies of molybdopterin synthase provide insights into its catalytic mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 14514–14522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Joshi, M.S.; Johnson, J.L.; Rajagopalan, K.V. Molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis in Escherichia coli mod and mog mutants. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 4310–4312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kuper, J.; Winking, J.; Hecht, H.J.; Mendel, R.R.; Schwarz, G. The active site of the molybdenum cofactor biosynthetic protein domain Cnx1G. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 411, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Llamas, A.; Mendel, R.R.; Schwarz, N. Synthesis of adenylated molybdopterinAn essential step for molybdenum insertion. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 55241–55246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Krausze, J.; Hercher, T.W.; Zwerschke, D.; Kirk, M.L.; Blankenfeldt, W.; Mendel, R.R.; Kruse, T. The functional principle of eukaryotic molybdenum insertases. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 1739–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Probst, C.; Yang, J.; Krausze, J.; Hercher, T.W.; Richers, C.P.; Spatzal, T.; Kc, K.; Giles, L.J.; Rees, D.C.; Mendel, R.R.; et al. Mechanism of molybdate insertion into pterin-based molybdenum cofactors. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palmer, T.; Vasishta, A.; Whitty, P.W.; Boxer, D.H. Isolation of Protein Fa, a Product of the Mob Locus Required for Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis in Escherichia-Coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 222, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Neumann, M.; Mittelstadt, G.; Seduk, F.; Iobbi-Nivol, C.; Leimkuhler, S. MocA Is a Specific Cytidylyltransferase Involved in Molybdopterin Cytosine Dinucleotide Biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 21891–21898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Reschke, S.; Sigfridsson, K.G.; Kaufmann, P.; Leidel, N.; Horn, S.; Gast, K.; Schulzke, C.; Haumann, M.; Leimkuhler, S. Identification of a bis-molybdopterin intermediate in molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 29736–29745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Eaves, D.J.; Palmer, T.; Boxer, D.H. The product of the molybdenum cofactor gene mobB of Escherichia coli is a GTP-binding protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 246, 690–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Magalon, A.; Frixon, C.; Pommier, J.; Giordano, G.; Blasco, F. In vivo interactions between gene products involved in the final stages of molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 48199–48204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. McLuskey, K.; Harrison, J.A.; Schuttelkopf, A.W.; Boxer, D.H.; Hunter, W.N. Insight into the role of Escherichia coli MobB in molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis based on the high resolution crystal structure. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 23706–23713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Otwinowski, Z.; Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Method Enzym. 1997, 276, 307–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McCoy, A.J.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; Adams, P.D.; Winn, M.D.; Storoni, L.C.; Read, R.J. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Cryst. 2007, 40, 658–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Winn, M.D.; Ballard, C.C.; Cowtan, K.D.; Dodson, E.J.; Emsley, P.; Evans, P.R.; Keegan, R.M.; Krissinel, E.B.; Leslie, A.G.W.; McCoy, A.; et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Cryst. D 2011, 67, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Murshudov, G.N.; Vagin, A.A.; Dodson, E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Cryst. D 1997, 53, 240–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bailey, S. The Ccp4 SuitePrograms for Protein Crystallography. Acta Cryst. D 1994, 50, 760–763. [Google Scholar]
  22. Adams, P.D.; Afonine, P.V.; Bunkoczi, G.; Chen, V.B.; Davis, I.W.; Echols, N.; Headd, J.J.; Hung, L.W.; Kapral, G.J.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; et al. PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Cryst. D Biol. Cryst. 2010, 66, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Emsley, P.; Cowtan, K. Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Cryst. D 2004, 60, 2126–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Williams, C.J.; Headd, J.J.; Moriarty, N.W.; Prisant, M.G.; Videau, L.L.; Deis, L.N.; Verma, V.; Keedy, D.A.; Hintze, B.J.; Chen, V.B.; et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Concepcion, J.; Witte, K.; Wartchow, C.; Choo, S.; Yao, D.F.; Persson, H.; Wei, J.; Li, P.; Heidecker, B.; Ma, W.L.; et al. Label-Free Detection of Biomolecular Interactions Using BioLayer Interferometry for Kinetic Characterization. Comb. Chem. High. T Scr. 2009, 12, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Krissinel, E.; Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 372, 774–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Walker, J.E.; Saraste, M.; Runswick, M.J.; Gay, N.J. Distantly Related Sequences in the Alpha-Subunits and Beta-Subunits of Atp Synthase, Myosin, Kinases and Other Atp-Requiring Enzymes and a Common Nucleotide Binding Fold. EMBO J. 1982, 1, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. DeLano, W.L.; Lam, J.W. PyMOL: A communications tool for computational models. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. S 2005, 230, U1371–U1372. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Biosynthesis of molybdenum cofactor (Moco) and further modifications to MCD and bis-MGD in bacteria. MobA and MobB catalyze the conversion of Moco to bis-MGD.
Figure 1. Biosynthesis of molybdenum cofactor (Moco) and further modifications to MCD and bis-MGD in bacteria. MobA and MobB catalyze the conversion of Moco to bis-MGD.
Crystals 11 01262 g001
Figure 2. The overall structure of MobB dimer (A) Two subunits of MobB dimer (magenta and green) are drawn in cartoon representation and the secondary structures are labeled. Four bound sulfate ions are drawn in a ball-and-stick model. The Walker A motifs are highlighted in yellow in both subunits. (B) Electrostatic potential surface of MobB dimer as shown in (A) drawn in −75 to 75 KbT/ec. (C) 90° rotated view of (A).
Figure 2. The overall structure of MobB dimer (A) Two subunits of MobB dimer (magenta and green) are drawn in cartoon representation and the secondary structures are labeled. Four bound sulfate ions are drawn in a ball-and-stick model. The Walker A motifs are highlighted in yellow in both subunits. (B) Electrostatic potential surface of MobB dimer as shown in (A) drawn in −75 to 75 KbT/ec. (C) 90° rotated view of (A).
Crystals 11 01262 g002
Figure 3. Sulfate-binding sites in MobB (A) bound sulfate ion in the Walker A motif is drawn in the ball-and-stick model. The hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines with the distances indicated in Å. (B) Sulfate ion in the second binding site. (C) Multiple sequence alignment of MobB homologs. Completely conserved residues are colored red and similar residues in yellow. Residues that are hydrogen-bonded with sulfate ions are marked with an asterisk.
Figure 3. Sulfate-binding sites in MobB (A) bound sulfate ion in the Walker A motif is drawn in the ball-and-stick model. The hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines with the distances indicated in Å. (B) Sulfate ion in the second binding site. (C) Multiple sequence alignment of MobB homologs. Completely conserved residues are colored red and similar residues in yellow. Residues that are hydrogen-bonded with sulfate ions are marked with an asterisk.
Crystals 11 01262 g003
Figure 4. Binding assay between B. subtilis MobA and MobB. The binding affinity was measured using the BLItz system. Response refers to a change in the thickness of the layer on the biosensor. The raw data and calculated KD values in the absence (orange) and presence (green) of GTP are shown.
Figure 4. Binding assay between B. subtilis MobA and MobB. The binding affinity was measured using the BLItz system. Response refers to a change in the thickness of the layer on the biosensor. The raw data and calculated KD values in the absence (orange) and presence (green) of GTP are shown.
Crystals 11 01262 g004
Table 1. Data Collection and Refinement Statistics.
Table 1. Data Collection and Refinement Statistics.
Data Collection
Space GroupC2
Unit Cell parameters (Å, °)a = 225.53, b = 42.11, c = 93.62, β = 100.99
Wavelength (Å)0.97921
Temperature (K)100
Resolution (Å) a50.0–2.40 (2.44–2.40)
No. of observed reflections117,931
No. of unique reflections33,530
Completeness (%)98.8 (99.7)
Rsym b0.109 (0.666)
<I/σ (I)> c9.0 (3.1)
Refinement statistics
No. of Residues746
No. of water molecules218
No. of sulfate ions13
Rcryst (%), Rfree (%) d21.0, 30.3
rmsd bonds (Å)0.014
rmsd angles (°)1.559
Ramachandran plot
Most favored region (%)96.8
Additionally allowed region (%)3.2
a Resolution range of the highest shell is listed in parentheses b Rsym = ∑I—<I>|/∑I, where I is the intensity of an individual reflection and <I> is the average intensity over symmetry equivalents c <I/σ (I)> is the mean reflection intensity/estimated error d Rcryst = ∑ ||F0|–|Fc||/∑|F0|, where Fo and Fc are the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, Rfree is equivalent to Rcryst but calculated for a randomly chosen set of reflections that were omitted from the refinement process.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, D.; Choi, S.; Kim, H.; Choe, J. Structural and Biochemical Studies of Bacillus subtilis MobB. Crystals 2021, 11, 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101262

AMA Style

Kim D, Choi S, Kim H, Choe J. Structural and Biochemical Studies of Bacillus subtilis MobB. Crystals. 2021; 11(10):1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Dajeong, Sarah Choi, Hyunjin Kim, and Jungwoo Choe. 2021. "Structural and Biochemical Studies of Bacillus subtilis MobB" Crystals 11, no. 10: 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101262

APA Style

Kim, D., Choi, S., Kim, H., & Choe, J. (2021). Structural and Biochemical Studies of Bacillus subtilis MobB. Crystals, 11(10), 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop