1. Introduction
AlGaN/GaN high-electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) are used in high-power, high-frequency applications because they possess properties such as high bulk electron mobility in GaN, a large bandgap, low noise, high thermal control capability, and a high breakdown electric field; furthermore, a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas (2-DEG) exists at the heterojunction interface [
1,
2]. To effectively suppress gate leakage, the Schottky gate can be replaced by a metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) structure; this allows for the surface state issue to be mitigated via a surface passivation technique [
3]. Many oxide materials (e.g., SiO
2, Al
2O
3, HfO
2, and La
2O
3) can be used as the gate oxide layer [
4,
5,
6,
7]. Al
2O
3 simultaneously has a wide bandgap and high relative permittivity. These features make it promising for exploitation in gate oxide applications. In general, MOS-HEMT operates in depletion mode (D-mode) because of thick oxide, cap, and barrier layers. These issues can be resolved by reducing the thickness of the gate oxide layer [
8,
9,
10]. However, the on-resistance increased for MOS-HEMTs when the 2-DEG density reduced along the entire channel [
11]. Two methods have been proposed for the fabrication of an enhancement mode (E-mode) operation MOS-HEMT without reducing the 2-DEG density. The two methods are recessed-gate and fluoride-based plasma treatment [
12,
13]. The aforementioned methods basically treat the local area underneath the gate region. Recessed-gate and fluoride-based plasma treatments depend on inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) processes that cannot control the etching depth precisely. To resolve the thick layer problem using an etching-free process and without reducing the 2-DEG density, electrons are only implanted through a corona-discharge plasma (CDP) system. CDP treatment is a well-known process often exploited for microphone fabrication. Electrons are implanted onto a dielectric material, thus giving these devices the name “electret condenser microphone” [
14]. The electrets act as permanent charge sources, thus an electret condenser microphone can produce a signal without needing any external biasing. This method has several advantages—it is a simple process, is vacuum-free, and is suitable for large-area fabrication. High voltage is applied to the plasma generated in the air to accelerate the electrons from the ionized electrode and control the electrons that travel toward the target using a grid potential. Finally, the electrons are implanted inside the film and become the electret. In this work, the performance of AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMTs with a CDP-treated (CDPT) GaN cap and oxide layer was studied.
2. Materials and Methods
The AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT structures were grown onto 6-in silicon substrates using metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. The device layer comprised a 4.2 µm-thick undoped GaN buffer layer, a 150 nm-thick GaN channel layer, a 31 nm-thick Al
0.24Ga
0.76N barrier, and a 1.5 nm-thick GaN cap layer. The mesa isolation was in an ICP-RIE system with BCl
3/Cl
2/Ar. A Ti/Al/Ti/Au (25/125/45/60 nm) metal stack was evaporated onto the source (S) and drain (D) regions. For ohmic contacts, samples were annealed at 850 °C in ambient nitrogen. After the ohmic contact process, a 30 nm Al
2O
3 layer was deposited using atomic layer deposition at 300 °C. For the final step, Ni/Au (150/60 nm) gate metals were deposited using E-beam evaporation. Two types of CDPT samples were prepared in this study; one was the treated GaN cap layer, and the other was the treated Al
2O
3 layer; both were treated at 12 kV for 750 s in air. A schematic view of the fabricated AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT device and the CDPT system are shown in
Figure 1a,b, respectively. The gate length, gate-to-drain, gate-to-source, and source-to-drain distances were L
G = 7 µm, L
GD = 11 µm, L
GS = 2 µm, and L
SD = 20 µm, respectively. Reference samples were fabricated on the same wafer without CDPT. The current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of these samples were measured using an B1505 parameter analyzer (KEYSIGHT Technology, Santa Rosa, CA, USA).
3. Results and Discussion
In order to confirm that the thin films become the electrets, contact angles of the GaN and Al
2O
3 before and after CDPT were measured and are shown in
Figure 2. The contact angle was measured by dropping DI-water on the different surface and determining the angle between the films and the tangent to the drop surface. The contact angles of the GaN, CDP-treated GaN, Al
2O
3, and CDP-treated Al
2O
3 were 59.97°, 18.93°, 43.37°, and 31.99°, respectively, shown in
Figure 2a–d. Obviously, the contact angle can be reduced after CDP treatment. This indicated that the thin films were becoming charged due to the electron implantation.
Figure 3 depicts the output characteristics of AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMTs (a) that were untreated, (b) that had a treated GaN layer, and (c) that had a treated Al
2O
3 layer. A significant saturation drain current enhancement was observed in the MOS-HEMT containing treated GaN; this can be attributed to an increase in the 2-DEG sheet carrier concentration. This enhancement can be demonstrated using a Hall measurement;
Table 1 shows a comparison of the characteristics of the semiconductors of the reference samples and the samples after the corona-discharge plasma treatment. The electron mobility, sheet resistance, and electron concentration were 1550 cm
2 V
−1·s
−1, 549.9 Ω/sq., and 7.34 × 10
12 cm
−2 for the reference samples, and those for the CDPT samples were 1450 cm
2 V
−·s
−1, 425.7 Ω/sq., and 1.007 × 10
13 cm
−2, respectively. The sheet concentration increased from 7.341 × 10
12 to 1.007 × 10
13 cm
−2 for the untreated and treated GaN structures. Nevertheless, the mobility and sheet resistivity were found to be lowered after the corona-discharge plasma treatment.
Figure 4 shows the transfer characteristics and transconductance of AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMTs both with and without CDPT. The threshold voltage (V
th) was extracted by extrapolating the linear part of the transfer curves to zero. The V
th values were −7.19, −8.92, and −4.21 V for the untreated MOS-HEMT, the MOS-HEMT with the treated GaN layer, and the MOS-HEMT with the treated Al
2O
3 layer, respectively. V
th exhibited a negative shift when the treated GaN layer was used in the MOS-HEMT. In the MOS-HEMT that had not been treated, the V
th shifted positively; this was also the case for the MOS-HEMT with the treated Al
2O
3 layer. Although these three devices were operating in depletion mode, their V
th values could be tuned depending on which of the three layers CDPT was used on. The maximum transconductance values (g
m,
max) were 36.08 mS mm
−1 for the untreated MOS-HEMT, 53.36 mS mm
−1 for the MOS-HEMT with the treated GaN layer, and 47.92 mS mm
−1 for the MOS-HEMT with the treated Al
2O
3 layer.
Figure 5 depicts the AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT transfer curves both with and without CDPT at V
DS = 10 V. Off-state leakage currents of 2.9 × 10
−5, 1.3 × 10
−3, and 4.2 × 10
−7 mA/mm were observed for the AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMTs without treatment, with the treated GaN layer, and with the treated Al
2O
3 layer, respectively. The off-state current increased when the device was treated using the GaN layer, and it was suppressed when the device was treated using the Al
2O
3 layer. It is worth mentioning that the three devices exhibited very low leakage currents from the gate to the source; as a result, the influence of the off-state current from the gate current can be ignored. Nevertheless, for the MOS-HEMT with the treated GaN layer, the on–off current (I
ON/I
OFF) ratio decreased from 8.3 × 10
6 to 3.2 × 10
5. By contrast, the MOS-HEMT with the treated Al
2O
3 layer exhibited a significantly better I
ON/I
OFF ratio of 7.3 × 10
8. Moreover, by comparing the subthreshold swing (SS) of the MOS-HEMTs with the untreated and treated GaN layers, the SS was found to increase significantly from 118 mV dec
−1 to 172 mV dec
−1; however, the SS decreased to 78 mV dec
−1 for the MOS-HEMT with the treated Al
2O
3 layer.
A possible mechanism was proposed for the aforementioned phenomena (shown in
Figure 6). For the CDPT-GaN layer, accelerated electrons with high velocity and energy were able to penetrate through the ultra-thin GaN capping layer (1.5 nm) and into the AlGaN barrier layer. These implanted electrons are pushed from the AlGaN layer to the 2-DEG shown in
Figure 6a, which results in the 2-DEG electron sheet concentration increasing. As a result, the channel turns on earlier, which results in the threshold voltage shifting negatively. Moreover, this results in the I
ON and I
OFF values increasing. In this case, it could reduce the I
ON/I
OFF ratio for the CDPT-GaN layer as compared with the MOS-HEMT without CDPT. However, for the CDPT gate Al
2O
3 layer, the accelerated electrons were implanted inside the dielectric and became the electrets. For this gate Al
2O
3 layer with storage charges, it thus caused a dielectric polarization, as shown in
Figure 6b. The dielectric with the electrets had a quasi-permanent dipole polarization and could impart an applied negative voltage. For the MOS-HEMT with the treated Al
2O
3 layer, the electrons in 2-DEG were repelled by the polarization charges. This resulted in a reduction in the carrier density in 2-DEG. It could reduce I
OFF and shift the V
th positively. However, the electrons in the AlGaN barrier layer accumulated at the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction interface owing to the energy barrier. This is demonstrated by the MOS-HEMT with the treated GaN layer having the largest I
DS and the MOS-HEMT with the treated Al
2O
3 layer having the smallest I
DS. Although the V
th shifted positively, the MOS-HEMT with the treated Al
2O
3 layer still presents D-mode operation under the treated parameters (12 KV and 750 s). The magnitude of the accumulated electrons was dependent on the Corona treatment voltage and treatment time. The effect of these parameters on device performance is important and is currently under study.