Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Adhesive Compounds Biochemical Modification on the Mechanical Properties of Adhesive Joints
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical Measurement System and Precision Analysis for Tactile Property Evaluation of Porous Polymeric Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Chitosan Derivatives: Introducing New Functionalities with a Controlled Molecular Architecture for Innovative Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioinspired Fabrication of Polyurethane/Regenerated Silk Fibroin Composite Fibres with Tubuliform Silk-Like Flat Stress–Strain Behaviour
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Compression Properties of Interlayer and Intralayer Carbon/Glass Hybrid Composites

1
College of Textiles, Donghua University, No. 2999, Northern Renmin Rd, Songjiang District, Shanghai 201620, China
2
Key Lab of Textile Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, No. 2999, Northern Renmin Rd, Songjiang District, Shanghai 201620, China
3
Center for Civil Aviation Composites, No. 2999, Northern Renmin Rd, Songjiang District, Shanghai 201620, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2018, 10(4), 343; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10040343
Submission received: 27 February 2018 / Revised: 16 March 2018 / Accepted: 19 March 2018 / Published: 21 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Textile and Textile-Based Materials)

Abstract

:
The compression properties and mechanisms of interlayer and intralayer Carbon/Glass (C/G) hybrid composites were investigated in this work. As revealed from the experimental results, the compression modulus increases linearly with the increase of carbon fiber content, following the rule of mixtures (ROM). The C/G hybrid ratio is regarded as the decisive factor for the compression modulus of hybrid composites. The positive mixing effect exists on compression strength for interlayer and intralayer hybrid composites, whereas the experimental values are above the theoretical calculation values. The compressive strength of interlayer hybrid composites taking on various hybrid structures differs largely at the same mixed ratio, at which the compressive strength of glass fiber sandwiching carbon fiber is higher than that of carbon fiber sandwiching glass fiber. Through comparing interlayer and intralayer hybrid composites, the impact exerted by layer structures on the compressive strength of interlayer hybrid composites is higher than that of intralayer hybrid composites, which leads to more designable characteristics for interlayer hybrid composites. This work makes it possible to optimize the compression strength of interlayer hybrid structures so that it achieves or basically exceeds pure carbon fiber composites.

1. Introduction

Fiber-reinforced composites, by virtue of high specific strength, high modulus, and fatigue resistance, are widely applied in the aerospace, automotive wind power, etc. fields [1]. Carbon fiber composites take on high strength and modulus, whereas the fracture strain is small with insufficient impact resistance [2]. This defect could be a problem for the use of carbon-reinforced structures under compression or flexural loading. Besides this, the high cost of carbon fiber limits the widespread application of carbon fiber composites in the industry [3,4], which is the reason why carbon fiber is only popular in luxury products [5]. The modulus of glass fiber is lower relative to carbon fiber composites, but the breaking elongation is large, which leads to comparatively better impact resistance [6]. It is believed that a combination of carbon and glass fiber can make the best use of their advantages and make up for the deficiencies [7,8]. This type of material made from two or more reinforcements is called a hybrid composite. A mixture of Carbon/Class (C/G) can achieve the purpose of optimizing the fracture strain and modulus of composites [7,9]. So far, study on C/G hybrid composites has mainly focused on short fiber, sandwich, interlayer, and intralayer hybrids, where interlayer and intralayer hybrid structures are the main hybrid forms [10].
Research on the mechanical behaviors of hybrid composites primarily emphasizes the tensile and flexural properties of interlayer hybrid composites, and most of them are performed on various hybrid structures and mixed ratios under a single hybrid form [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The compression behavior of a composite is one of the most critical mechanical properties; however, there are few studies on the compressive properties of hybrid composites, which mainly research the compression behavior of interlayer hybrid composites [23,24]. S.F. Hwang [23] studied the compression properties of interlayer hybrid composites, and revealed that an increase in glass fiber content in hybrid composites can decrease the compressive strength. A similar conclusion can be confirmed by S. Chandra [25], who studied a C/G hybrid composite cylinder. S. Kedar [26] investigated the compression properties of a carbon and glass woven hybrid composite, and the result presented that a decrease in compressive strength of hybrid composites, compared with a carbon/epoxy composite, is not evident. M.H. Ikbal [27] found that the compressive strength of an intralayer hybrid structure is a bit better than that of an interlayer hybrid structure. M.T. Dehkordi [28] investigated the compressive strength of Basalt/Nylon interlayer hybrid composites, and revealed that hybrid structures have no effect on compressive strength; however, S.F. Hwang [24] found the compressive strength of the local symmetrical layer to be lower than that of the global symmetrical layer. Another study indicates that the compressive strain of sandwich hybrid specimens shows a 380% positive hybrid effect with regard to carbon fiber laminates [29].
Reports on the mechanical properties of intralayer C/G hybrid composites are limited; especially, little work has been done on the compression properties of intralayer hybrid. In our work, the interlayer and intralayer hybrid structures were designed systematically and the compression performances of the hybrid composites were investigated using experiments and compared with the values from theoretical calculations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

T620SC-24K-50C carbon fiber supplied by TORAY Inc., ECT469L-2400 glass fiber from CPIC glass fiber Inc., and 2511-1A/BS epoxy resin from SWANCOR Inc. (Shanghai, China), were adopted in this work. Table 1 reports the mechanical parameters of the raw materials and specifications and structures of five unidirectional warp-knitted fabrics (Non-Crimp Fabric, NCF), including a pure carbon fiber fabric, a glass fiber fabric, and three kinds of hybrid fabrics with various C/G ratios, are presented in Table 2 and Figure 1, respectively.

2.2. Hybrid Scheme Design

2.2.1. Interlayer Hybrid Composites

Interlayer hybrid structures consist of four C/G hybrid ratios as 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4. Various hybrid structures are formed at the same ratio through altering the stacking configurations of carbon and glass fiber layers. Interlayer hybrid structures are presented in Table 3.

2.2.2. Intralayer Hybrid Composites

Intralayer hybrid schemes consist of three hybrid fabrics with three mixed ratios. Four layers of a laminate were adopted to reduce the influence of the boundary effect. Various dispersion degrees were attained by the dislocation arrangements of hybrid fabrics at the same mixed ratio. Intralayer schemes are presented in Table 4.

2.3. Compression Tests

The vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding process (VARTM) was adopted to prepare composites, and fiber volume content was maintained at 50%. A compression test in the 0 and 90 degree directions was performed at speed of 1.3 mm/min according to the standard ASTM D6641. The force attenuation rate, considering the difference of speed and mode of carbon and glass fiber under failure, is established at 50% as the testing end parameter.
The specimen width of interlayer hybrid composites was set to 12 mm following ASTM D6641; the width of compression specimens was established at the width of a single cell of the hybrid structures. Carbon fiber and glass fiber should be symmetrically distributed to reduce the impact of asymmetric structures. Sample cutting diagrams are presented in Figure 2.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Compression Performances of Interlayer Hybrid Composites

The compression modulus, compressive fracture strain, compression mechanism and compressive strength of interlayer hybrid composites are presented in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Figure 3 indicates the effect of mixed ratios and stacking sequences on the compressive modulus of interlayer hybrid composites. It was found that an increase in carbon fiber content improves the modulus of interlayer hybrid composites, whereas the impact exerted by various stacking sequences on the compression modulus is not evident at the same mixed ratio.
The results, presented in Figure 4, indicate that the compressive fracture strain of interlayer hybrid composites takes on an evident downward trend as carbon fiber content increases. The stacking sequence has a significant influence on the compressive strain at the same mixed ratio. As accordingly found, the compression fracture strain of an interlayer hybrid composite is comparatively large as glass fiber tends to be in the outer layer and carbon fiber in the inner layer, such as [G–C–C–G], [G–C–G], and [G–G–C–G–G]. Besides, compression fracture strain is small while the carbon fiber is all distributed in the outer layers, such as [C–G–G–C], [C–G–G–G–G], [C–G–G–G], and [C–G–G].
The internal stress states of interlayer hybrid structures under compression with carbon and glass fiber distributed in various layers are presented in Figure 5. Internal carbon fiber is subject to the inward extrusion force from external glass fiber with glass fiber in the outer layer and carbon fiber in the inner layer as presented in Figure 5a. Given this, it is difficult to deform the inner layer. The compressive fracture strain of glass fiber, additionally, is higher than that of carbon fiber, which continues to provide a certain amount of interlayer normal stress and prevents the collapse failure of the carbon layer. Figure 5b presents the structure with carbon fiber in the outer layer and with glass fiber in the inner layer, and the outside carbon layer provides a certain amount of interlayer normal stress to the inner glass fiber layer at the initial phase under compression. Yet the carbon fiber layers fail earlier and the glass fiber layers merely assume the compression force, which makes the strength comparatively low.
As observed in Figure 6 through referencing the foregoing failure mechanisms, there is no indication that the compressive strength of interlayer hybrid composites will increase linearly as carbon fiber content increases, whereas the stacking sequence of carbon and glass fiber greatly impacts compressive strength. Excellent compressive strength can be obtained by optimizing the mixed ratio and stacking sequences, inclusive of glass fiber distribution in the outer layer.
Figure 5. Internal stress diagram with (a) Carbon fiber inside, and (b) Carbon fiber outside under compression.
Figure 5. Internal stress diagram with (a) Carbon fiber inside, and (b) Carbon fiber outside under compression.
Polymers 10 00343 g005
Figure 6. Compression strength of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Figure 6. Compression strength of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Polymers 10 00343 g006
The results on the compression modulus and strength with various mixed ratios and hybrid structures in the 90-degree direction are presented in Figure 7. No evident impact is exerted by mixing ratios and the hybrid structure of C/G hybrid composites on the 90-degree compression modulus and strength. The compression properties of the 90-degree direction are primarily determined by the compression property of the resin given that the fiber is all arranged along the 0-degree direction.

3.2. Compression Performances of Intralayer Hybrid Composites

The compression modulus of intralayer hybrid composites with various mixing ratios and hybrid structures are presented in Figure 8. It was found that the modulus of intralayer hybrid composites increases progressively as the carbon fiber content increases. However, the impact of various layer structures on the modulus of a hybrid composite is not significant at the same C/G mixed ratio.
The compressive strength of hybrid composites with various mixing ratios and hybrid structures is presented in Figure 9. As indicated in the results, the compressive strength of interlayer hybrid composites is below that of both carbon and glass fiber composites. Moreover, alterations in carbon fiber content and hybrid structures at the same hybrid ratio exert no evident impact on the compressive strength.

3.3. Experimental and Theoretical Values of Compressive Strength and Modulus

Carbon fiber within hybrid composites fails firstly due to the low fracture strain, while the compressive loading exceeds the carbon fiber’s maximum strain, and glass fiber still assumes the residual load until it is damaged. Formulas for calculating stress of hybrid composites before and after the fracture of carbon fiber are presented as (1) and (2) [30] following the rule of mixture (ROM).
Before carbon fiber fracture :   σ HY = ( V C E C + V G E G ) ε
After carbon fiber fracture :   σ HY = V G E G ε
where σ HY denotes the compression stress of a hybrid composite (MPa), V C , V G represent the volume content of carbon fiber and glass fiber composite (%), respectively, E C , E G refer to the compression modulus of carbon fiber and glass fiber composite (GPa), respectively, and ε represents the strain of the hybrid composite (%).
Comparisons of compressive stress-strain curves from experimental and theoretical results are shown in Figure 10. The experimental modulus is indicated to be complying well with the theoretical value in the initial phase. Yet as a higher loading is applied, the experimental compressive strength appears to differ apparently from the theoretical curves and present a ladder-type change. Compressive collapse leads to a sample’s failure and the failure process is comparatively slow. After crushing failure, carbon composites with low fracture strain, unlike the rapid failure in the tensile process, still assume a certain force until the sample completely fails.
The mechanical properties of hybrid composites present various hybrid effects, while some structures can enhance their mechanical properties, and some structures may weaken their properties. Accordingly, this work here introduces the ROM to evaluate the hybrid effect. As indicated by the ROM, the mechanical property of a hybrid structure is calculated following the mixed ratio of two materials [19]. The calculation formula for the compression modulus of hybrid composites is presented below:
E R O M = V C E C + V G E G
where E R O M denotes the compression modulus of hybrid composites (GPa).
Figure 11 presents the comparison between the experimental compression modulus and the theoretical values. It was found that the theoretical values comply well with the experimental values.
The experimental and theoretical compression strength of hybrid composites is presented in Figure 12. In theory, the compression strength tends to decrease first and then increase as the content of carbon fiber increases. As indicated in the theoretical analysis, the compression strength of a hybrid structure is minimized for the 1:2 C/G mixed ratio. The experimental compression strength of the interlayer and intralayer hybrid composites is above the theoretical values, which demonstrates a positive hybrid effect, and the compression strength takes on an increasing trend as the carbon fiber content increases. The impact exerted by variations in layer structures of an interlayer hybrid on the compression strength is greater than an intralayer hybrid at the same mixed ratio. The compression strength of the interlayer structure, such as [G–C–C–G] and [G–C–G], is deemed to be basically stronger than or equal to pure carbon fiber composites which makes it possible to achieve higher compressive strength with less carbon fiber content.

4. Conclusions

Compressive properties of hybrid composites were investigated in this work, and failure mechanisms were analyzed.
The following conclusions were made:
  • The compression modulus of interlayer and intralayer hybrid composites is determined by the mixed ratio.
  • Alterations in layer structures merely impact the compressive strength of the interlayer hybrid composites, which mainly manifest as compression strength, fracture strain and strength of an interlayer hybrid composite with glass fiber sandwiching carbon fiber above that of carbon fiber sandwiching glass fiber.
  • There is no evident impact of mixing ratios and hybrid structure of C/G interlayer hybrid composites on compression modulus and strength under the 90-degree compression loading.
  • As indicated through comparing experimental results and theoretical calculation values for interlayer and intralayer hybrid composites, the experimental compressive modulus is consistent with theoretical values calculated via the ROM, while the experimental compressive strength surmounts the theoretical values and exhibits a positive hybrid effect.
  • Moreover, interlayer hybrid composites provide more excellent mechanical properties than intralayer hybrid structures, which make it possible for interlayer hybrid composites to attain higher strength on the premise of using less carbon fiber.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Innovation Funding for Graduates of Donghua University Grant No. CHSF-DH-D-2015010.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was completed through contributions of all authors. Wei Li originated the overall motivation of the work and participated in the discussion the experimental plan and results. Qingtao Wang designed the hybrid fabrics and layup structures and performed the compression experiments. Weili Wu analyzed the data. Qingtao Wang and Weili Wu wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thornton, P.H. Energy Absorption in Composite Structures. J. Compost. Mater. 1979, 13, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oya, N.; Hamada, H. Effects of Reinforcing Fibre Properties on Various Mechanical Behaviors of Unidirectional Carbon/Epoxy Laminates. Sci. Eng. Compost. Mater. 1996, 5, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cramer, D.R.; Taggart, D.F.; Hypercar Inc. Design and Manufacture of an Affordable Advanced-Composite Automotive Body Structure. In Proceedings of the 19th International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition, Busan, Korea, 19–23 October 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Thilagavathi, G.; Pradeep, E.; Kannaian, T.; Sasikala, L. Development of Natural Fiber Nonwovens for Application as Car Interiors for Noise Control. J. Ind. Text. 2010, 39, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.; Chaisombat, K.; He, S.; Wang, C.H. Hybrid Composite Laminates Reinforced with Glass/Carbon Woven Fabrics for Lightweight Load Bearing Structures. Mater. Des. 2012, 36, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Davies, I.J. Flexural Failure of Unidirectional Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites Containing Different Grades of Glass Fibre. Adv. Mater. Res. 2008, 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  7. Manders, P.W.; Bader, M.G. The Strength of Hybrid Glass/Carbon Fibre Composites. J. Mater. Sci. 1981, 16, 2233–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zweben, C. Tensile Strength of Hybrid Composites. J. Mater. Sci. 1977, 12, 1325–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ikbal, M.H.; Wei, L. Effect of Proportion of Carbon Fiber Content and the Dispersion of Two Fiber Types on Tensile and Compressive Properties of Intra-Layer Hybrid Composites. Text. Res. J. 2017, 87, 305–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kretsis, G. A Review of the Tensile, Compressive, Flexural and Shear Properties of Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Plastics. Composites 1987, 18, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hang, Z.Y.; Choi, J.R.; Soo-Jin, P. Thermal Conductivity and Thermo-Physical Properties of Nanodiamond-Attached Exfoliated Hexagonal Boron Nitride/Epoxy Nanocomposites for Microelectronics. Compost. App. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 101, 227–236. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fu, S.Y.; Lauke, B.; Mäder, E.; Yue, C.Y.; Hu, X. Tensile Properties of Short-Glass-Fiber-and Short-Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Compost. App. Sci. Manuf. 2000, 31, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bunsell, A.R.; Harris, B. Hybrid Carbon and Glass Fibre Composites. Composites 1974, 5, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kalnin, I.L. Evaluation of Unidirectional Glass-Graphite Fiber/Epoxy Resin Composites. Compost. Mater. ASTM Int. 1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marom, G.; Fischer, S.; Tuler, F.R.; Wagner, H.D. Hybrid Effects in Composites: Conditions for Positive or Negative Effects Versus Rule-of-Mixtures Behaviour. J. Mater. Sci. 1978, 13, 1419–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Song, D.C.; Davies, I.J. Optimal Design for the Flexural Behaviour of Glass and Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer Hybrid Composites. Mater. Des. 2012, 37, 450–457. [Google Scholar]
  17. Song, D.C.; Ranaweera-Jayawardena, H.A.; Davies, I.J. Flexural Properties of Hybrid Composites Reinforced by S-2 Glass and T700s Carbon Fibres. Compost. Eng. 2012, 43, 573–581. [Google Scholar]
  18. Song, D.C.; Davies, I.J. Flexural and Tensile Strengths of Unidirectional Hybrid Epoxy Composites Reinforced by S-2 Glass and T700s Carbon Fibres. Mater. Des. 2014, 574, 955–966. [Google Scholar]
  19. Song, D.C.; Davies, I.J. Flexural and Tensile Moduli of Unidirectional Hybrid Epoxy Composites Reinforced by S-2 Glass and T700s Carbon Fibres. Mater. Des. 2014, 54, 893–899. [Google Scholar]
  20. Davies, I.J.; Hamada, H. Flexural Properties of a Hybrid Polymer Matrix Composite Containing Carbon and Silicon Carbide Fibres. Adv. Compost. Mater. 2001, 10, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sudarisman; de San Miguel, B.; Davies, I.J. The Effect of Partial Substitution of E-Glass Fibre for Carbon Fibre on the Mechanical Properties of CFRP Composites. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Materials and Metallurgical Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia, 24–25 June 2009; pp. 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  22. Miwa, M.; Horiba, N. Effects of Fibre Length on Tensile Strength of Carbon/Glass Fibre Hybrid Composites. J. Mater. Sci. 1994, 29, 973–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shun-Fa, H.; Ching-Ping, M. Failure of Delaminated Interply Hybrid Composite Plates under Compression. Compost. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1513–1527. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hwang, S.F.; Ching-Ping, M. The Delamination Buckling of Single-Fibre System and Interply Hybrid Composites. Compost. Struct. 1999, 46, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yerramalli, C.S.; Waas, A. Compressive Behavior of Hybrid Composites. In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, USA, 7–10 April 2003; p. 1509. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pandya, K.S.; Veerraju, C.; Naik, N.K. Hybrid Composites Made of Carbon and Glass Woven Fabrics under Quasi-Static Loading. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4094–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ikbal, M.H.; Ahmed, A.; Tao, W.Q.; Shuai, Z.; Wei, L. Hybrid Composites Made of Unidirectional T600s Carbon and E-Glass Fabrics under Quasi-Static Loading. J. Ind. Text. 2017, 46, 1511–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dehkordi, M.T.; Nosraty, H.; Shokrieh, M.M.; Minak, G.; Ghelli, D. The Influence of Hybridization on Impact Damage Behavior and Residual Compression Strength of Intraply Basalt/Nylon Hybrid Composites. Mater. Des. 2013, 43, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, S.B.; Chawla, H. Hybrid Effect of Functionally Graded Hybrid Composites of Glass–Carbon Fibers. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Czél, G.; Jalalvand, M.; Wisnom, M.R. Design and Characterisation of Advanced Pseudo-Ductile Unidirectional Thin-Ply Carbon/Epoxy–Glass/Epoxy Hybrid Composites. Compost. Struct. 2016, 143, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic structures of three types of non-crimp fabrics (NCFs): (a) C–G; (b) C–G–G; (c) C–G–G–G–G.
Figure 1. Schematic structures of three types of non-crimp fabrics (NCFs): (a) C–G; (b) C–G–G; (c) C–G–G–G–G.
Polymers 10 00343 g001
Figure 2. Schematics of sample cutting: (a) [C–G]; (b) [C–G–G]; (c) [C–G–G–G–G].
Figure 2. Schematics of sample cutting: (a) [C–G]; (b) [C–G–G]; (c) [C–G–G–G–G].
Polymers 10 00343 g002
Figure 3. Compression modulus of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Figure 3. Compression modulus of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Polymers 10 00343 g003
Figure 4. Compression fracture strain of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Figure 4. Compression fracture strain of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Polymers 10 00343 g004
Figure 7. 90-degree direction compression modulus and strength of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Figure 7. 90-degree direction compression modulus and strength of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Polymers 10 00343 g007
Figure 8. Compression modulus of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Figure 8. Compression modulus of different stacking sequences with various C/G ratios.
Polymers 10 00343 g008
Figure 9. Compression strength comparison of different stacking sequences on various C/G ratios.
Figure 9. Compression strength comparison of different stacking sequences on various C/G ratios.
Polymers 10 00343 g009
Figure 10. Experimental and theoretical compression stress-strain curves of interlayer and intralayer hybrid composites at various hybrid ratios: (a) C:G=1:4; (b) C:G=1:3; (c) C:G=1:2; (d) C:G=1:1.
Figure 10. Experimental and theoretical compression stress-strain curves of interlayer and intralayer hybrid composites at various hybrid ratios: (a) C:G=1:4; (b) C:G=1:3; (c) C:G=1:2; (d) C:G=1:1.
Polymers 10 00343 g010aPolymers 10 00343 g010b
Figure 11. Interlayer and intralayer compression modulus attained by experiment and rule of mixture (ROM).
Figure 11. Interlayer and intralayer compression modulus attained by experiment and rule of mixture (ROM).
Polymers 10 00343 g011
Figure 12. Interlayer and intralayer compression strength obtained by experiment and ROM.
Figure 12. Interlayer and intralayer compression strength obtained by experiment and ROM.
Polymers 10 00343 g012
Table 1. Constituent materials and selected properties.
Table 1. Constituent materials and selected properties.
MaterialTensile Strength (MPa)Tensile Modulus (GPa)
CPIC ECT469L-2400 Glass Fiber236678.7
TORAY T620SC-24K-50C Carbon Fiber4175234
SWANCOR 2511-1A/BS Epoxy Resin73.53.1
Table 2. Specifications for hybrid fabrics.
Table 2. Specifications for hybrid fabrics.
Fabric TypeAreal Density (g/m2)Ratio of Carnon/Glass (C/G)
Carbon FiberGlass Fiber
Carbon728.301:0
Glass0944.90:1
C–G364.2472.41:1
C–G–G242.8629.91:2
C–G–G–G–G145.7755.91:4
Table 3. Stacking configurations of interlayer hybrid structures.
Table 3. Stacking configurations of interlayer hybrid structures.
C/G Hybrid RatiosStacking Sequences
C:G=1:1 Polymers 10 00343 i001 Polymers 10 00343 i002 Polymers 10 00343 i003 Polymers 10 00343 i004
[G/G/C/C][G/C/C/G][C/G/G/C][G/C/G/C]
C:G=1:2 Polymers 10 00343 i005 Polymers 10 00343 i006
[G/G/C][G/C/G]
C:G=1:3 Polymers 10 00343 i007 Polymers 10 00343 i008
[G/G/G/C][G/G/C/G]
C:G=1:4 Polymers 10 00343 i009 Polymers 10 00343 i010 Polymers 10 00343 i011
[G/G/G/G/C][G/G/G/C/G][G/G/C/G/G]
Table 4. Stacking configurations of intralayer hybrid structures.
Table 4. Stacking configurations of intralayer hybrid structures.
Hybrid FabricStacking Sequences
C–C–G–G
C:G=1:1
Polymers 10 00343 i012 Polymers 10 00343 i013 Polymers 10 00343 i014
[C–C–G–G]-0[C–C–G–G]-1[C–C–G–G]-2
Polymers 10 00343 i015 Polymers 10 00343 i016
[C–C–G–G]-0.5[C–C–G–G]-1.5
C–G–G
C:G=1:2
Polymers 10 00343 i017 Polymers 10 00343 i018 Polymers 10 00343 i019 Polymers 10 00343 i020
[C–G–G]-0[C–G–G]-1[C–G–G]-0.5[C–G–G]-1.5
C–G–G–G–G
C:G=1:4
Polymers 10 00343 i021 Polymers 10 00343 i022 Polymers 10 00343 i023
[C–G–G–G–G]-0[C–G–G–G–G]-1[C–G–G–G–G]-2
Polymers 10 00343 i024 Polymers 10 00343 i025 Polymers 10 00343 i026
[C–G–G–G–G]-0.5[C–G–G–G–G]-1.5[C–G–G–G–G]-2.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Wu, W.; Li, W. Compression Properties of Interlayer and Intralayer Carbon/Glass Hybrid Composites. Polymers 2018, 10, 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10040343

AMA Style

Wang Q, Wu W, Li W. Compression Properties of Interlayer and Intralayer Carbon/Glass Hybrid Composites. Polymers. 2018; 10(4):343. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10040343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qingtao, Weili Wu, and Wei Li. 2018. "Compression Properties of Interlayer and Intralayer Carbon/Glass Hybrid Composites" Polymers 10, no. 4: 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10040343

APA Style

Wang, Q., Wu, W., & Li, W. (2018). Compression Properties of Interlayer and Intralayer Carbon/Glass Hybrid Composites. Polymers, 10(4), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10040343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop