Next Article in Journal
Effect of an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet on the Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Waxy and Normal Maize Starch
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Photovoltaic Performance in D-π-A Copolymers Containing Triisopropylsilylethynyl-Substituted Dithienobenzodithiophene by Modulating the Electron-Deficient Units
Previous Article in Journal
Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) Doped with Ammonium Ionic Liquids and Nano-Silicon Dioxide for Polymer Electrolyte Membranes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication and Characterization of Isotropic and Anisotropic Magnetorheological Elastomers, Based on Silicone Rubber and Carbonyl Iron Microparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Konjac Glucomannan/Carrageenan/Nano-silica Films for the Preservation of Postharvest White Mushrooms

Department of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010006
Submission received: 13 December 2018 / Revised: 18 December 2018 / Accepted: 18 December 2018 / Published: 21 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Collection Silicon-Containing Polymeric Materials)

Abstract

:
In this study, the konjac glucomannan (KGM)/carrageenan (KC)/nano-silica film was prepared and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The preservation quality of white mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) packed using the films was also determined. The nano-silica dosage was found to affect the properties of the nanocomposite KGM/KC films. The results indicated that the properties of the films were significantly improved with the addition of nano-silica. The water vapor permeability, water solubility, moisture absorption, and light transmittance of KGM/KC/nano-silica films were significantly affected by the nano-silica dosage. In this study, the optimal nano-silica dosage to incorporate into the film in order to achieve excellent performance was 0.3%. Strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds were also observed between KGM/KC and nano-silica in the KGM/KC/nano-silica film by FTIR. In addition, the KGM/KC/nano-silica film markedly reduced the browning index, delayed the weight loss and softening, and extended the shelf life of mushrooms during storage at 4 °C. The KGM/KC film modified using nano-silica can provide a potential method for improving the preservation quality of white mushrooms during storage.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Food packaging is mostly produced from plastic materials. However, plastic materials are resilient to degradation, which could lead to a severe environmental problem. The use of biopolymers has drawn increasing attention for their application in the prevention of serious environmental problems. Biopolymers, as an important renewable energy resource, can provide raw materials for future industrial development [1,2]. In food packaging, films prepared using biopolymers can control the migration of humidity, O2, CO2, and aromas, and can also carry food ingredients to maintain food quality [3].
Konjac glucomannan (KGM) exhibits excellent biocompatibility, film-forming ability, and biodegradability [4,5], and for this has attracted significant interest as a potential packaging material amongst natural biopolymers. Carrageenans (KC) have 3,6-anhydro-d-galactopyranose residues and a negatively charged sulfate group in the chain. The characteristics of carrageenan provide its gel-forming ability [6]. Blending KGM/KC films is a convenient and effective method which can improve their physicochemical properties. However, KGM/KC films also have many disadvantages, including inferior mechanical properties, low strength, low water resistance, and poor antimicrobial activity; thus, its food preservation efficiency is unsatisfactory.
Nanotechnology is widely applied in the food industry, including in food processing, food packaging, and food evaluation [7,8,9]. As opposed to substances of normal size, nano-sized substances show quanta-size, small-size, surface, and macroscopic quanta-size effects [10]. Nanoparticles can provide the possibility of enhancing mechanical properties and permeability by taking advantage of their peculiar ability to disperse uniformly in the KC/KGM films and generate a hydrogen bond with KGM/KC molecules through surface hydroxyl groups [11]. Several nano-oxide particles, such as nano-silica, nano-TiO2, and nano-ZnO, have been developed as potential materials for nanocomposites [12,13,14]. Nano-silica cannot be digested by the digestive tract and is thus associated with food safety concerns. In addition, nano-silica can be regarded as a food additive [15]. Mixing nano-silica into KGM/KC films may considerably extend the shelf life of food by protecting them from environmental factors (oxygen, light, and bacterial spoilage) [16], restrict enzyme immobilization [17], and inhibit fruit and vegetable decay [18]. Therefore, KGM/KC/nano-silica composite films, a type of biomaterial, can be applied in fruit storage. We found that nano-silica could enhance the preservation properties of KGM/KC coatings to prolong the shelf life of white mushrooms by using coating treatment [19]. However, whether nano-silica dosages could affect the preservation properties of KGM/KC films, with their property, permeability, and microstructure all considered, has yet to be determined.
In this study, a KC/KGM/nano-silica film was prepared and then characterized by SEM, FTIR, and XRD. The preservation properties of KGM/KC/nano-silica films were investigated by packaging the white mushrooms. To obtain excellent properties, the optimal nano-silica dosage was determined. The KGM/KC film modified using nano-silica can provide a potential method for improving the preservation quality of white mushrooms during their storage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Nano-silica (20 nm), KC (κ-carrageenan, density = 1.000), and KGM (viscosity ≥30,000; expansion coefficient >100) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. White mushrooms were purchased in ZiBo City in Shandong Province, China. The mushrooms were then pretreated in preparation for package testing. The mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) had no mechanical damage, blemishes, or disease. Subsequently, they were immediately transported to the Shandong University of Technology to precool for 24 h at 2 °C.

2.2. Preparation of Composite Films

KGM/KC films and KGM/KC/nano-silica films were synthesized using the method illustrated in Figure 1. The contents (%) of the materials were evaluated relative to the volume of the solvent (w/v). For the preparation of the films, nano-silica at varying amounts (0% w/v, 0.1% w/v, 0.2% w/v, 0.3% w/v, 0.4% w/v, 0.5% w/v), 0.6% w/v KC, 0.2% w/v KGM, and 0.7% w/v glycerol were dissolved in the distilled water at 60 °C for 20 min. Subsequently, the mixture was sonicated using an ultrasonic processor (VCX 750, Sonics & Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) under the following conditions: frequency, 20 kHz; power, 150 W; and duration, 20 min. The 80 mL solution was poured into each glass, which was of equal size (25 cm × 25 cm). Films on the surface of each glass were dried in a circulation oven at 50 °C [(relative humidity (RH) of 50%)]. Ultimately, the films were uncovered for subsequent characterization and measurement of their properties. Prior to characterization of their properties, all films were conditioned at 23 °C and 50% RH for 24 h in a chamber (BSC-150, Shanghai Boxun Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.3. Characterization of Films

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR): The functional groups were estimated using a Nicolet 5700 analyzer, Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments Corp., Waltham, MA, USA. The spectra of the films were obtained within a 4000–400 cm−1 wavelength range [20].
X-ray diffraction (XRD): The crystalline properties of the films were characterized using a D8 Advance analyzer (Germany Bruker Corp., Heidelberg, Germany) equipped with Cu Kα radiation [21]. The scattering angle was in the 5–45° range with a scan rate of 1°/min.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): The morphology of the surface of the films was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Sirion 200, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operated at 20 kV. The samples were sputtered with a layer of gold.

2.4. Properties of Films

2.4.1. Thickness

The thickness of the films was measured using a micrometer (Dial thickness gauge 7301, Mitutoyo Co., Kawasaki, Japan) with a precision of 0.01 mm, and each film was chosen in at least ten random locations [22].

2.4.2. Water Vapor Transition Rate (WVTR)

The water vapor transition rate (WVTR) of the films was estimated in accordance with the Chinese National Standard GB1037-88 (1998). Dehydrated calcium chloride amounting to 0.3 g was placed in a cup. The films were fixed on the mouth of the cup and sealed with a rubber band. They were then weighed every 1 h for 24 h at 25 °C and RH 90%. The WVTR was evaluated using the following formula:
WVTR = m f m i D × S
where mf is the weight of the final cup; mi is the weight of the initial cup; D is the duration, in days; and S is the effective area of the films (the area of the cup mouth), in m2.

2.4.3. Tensile Strength (Ts)

The tensile strength (Ts) of the films was measured using a texture analyzer (TMS-2000, FTC, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The films were cut into 50 mm × 15 mm rectangular strips. The probe of the Acoustic Multiple Tensile Grips (AMTG) was employed at an initial distance of separation with 30 mm and a velocity of 10 mm/s. All tests were repeated three times.

2.4.4. Color

The color of the film samples was determined using the Chroma Meter (Konica Minolta, CR-400, Tokyo, Japan) with the D65 standard illuminant. All samples (3 cm × 5 cm) had the white standard color plate (L* = 94.6, a = −0.62, and b = 1.42) as the background [23]. The total color difference (ΔE) was determined using the following equation:
E = ( L L ) 2 + ( a a ) 2 + ( b b ) 2
where L, a, and b denote the differences in each color value of the films.

2.4.5. Transparency

A UV spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shanghai, China) was used to evaluate the transparency of the films [24]. Film samples were cut into a uniform size (1 cm × 4 cm) and then scanned at a wavelength of 600 nm (T600).

2.4.6. Water Solubility (WS) and Moisture Absorption (MA)

The procedures for determining WS and MA have been described in detail in our previous study [19]. Samples (3 cm × 5 cm) were cut from each type of film to determine the WS of the films. The films (m1) were pretreated at 50 °C for 24 h and then immersed in distilled water (30 mL), with occasional stirring at 25 °C for 6 h. Undissolved films (m2) were dried at 50 °C to a constant weight [11]. The analytical method of determining MA was similar to that described by Moreno et al. (2017) [25]. The films (m3) were pretreated at 50 °C for 24 h and then placed at 23 °C and RH 60% for 6 h. The films were then weighed (m4). WS and MA were calculated using the following formulas:
WS = m 1 m 2 m 1 × 100
MA = m 4 m 3 m 3 × 100

2.4.7. Oxygen Transmission Rate (OTR) and Carbon Dioxide Transmission Rate (CDTR)

The oxygen transmission rate (OTR) and carbon dioxide transmission rate (CDTR) were determined using the method described by Wang et al. (2014) [21]. Different films were fixed on a cup mouth containing 3 g deoxidizer/5g KOH and then sealed with a rubber band. They were then placed under the following conditions: temperature, 23 °C; RH, 90%; and duration, 48 h. Subsequently, the cups were weighed for determination using the equations described in detail by Zhang et al. (2018) [19]. The OTR and CDTR were calculated according to the following equations:
OTR = m 1 D × S
CDTR = m 2 D × S
where ∆m1 is the amount of O2 absorbed by the deoxidizer; Δm2 is the amount of CO2 absorbed by KOH; D is the storage time, in days; and S is the effective area of the films, in m2.

2.5. Application of Films for Mushroom Storage Stability

White mushrooms were placed on 1050 mL polypropylene trays and then covered with a KGM/KC/nano-silica film and a KGM/KC film. Each tray contained 160 g samples. Mushrooms without packaging were used as the control. The weight loss, firmness, whiteness, membrane permeability, and sensory evaluation (hardness, fracturability, adhesiveness, stringiness) of the mushrooms were measured at intervals (0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 d) during storage at 4 °C.
Weight loss was measured gravimetrically during storage. The whiteness was measured with a colorimeter (SC-80C, Beijing, China). The tissue electrolyte leakage was determined to obtain the membrane permeability [26]. The firmness was evaluated using a penetrometer (GY-1, Beijing, China). The sensory properties (hardness, fracturability, adhesiveness, stringiness) of the mushrooms were measured with a texture analyzer (TMS-2000, Los Angeles, CA, USA) under the texture profile analysis (TPA) pattern [27,28]. The mushrooms were cut into cuboid shapes (measuring 30 mm × 30 mm × 30 mm) and compressed using a P/36R probe at a speed of 0.5 mm/s and at 30% of compression. From the TPA curves, the following texture parameters were obtained: Hardness at 30% of deformation, fracturability, adhesiveness, and stringiness. Each test was repeated at least three times to ensure reproducibility.

2.6. Statistical Design

All experiments were conducted at least three times for each sample. SEM, XRD, and FTIR were conducted without repeat tests. The Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) software was used to analyze the variance of all data. Duncan’s test indicated significant differences between means at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectroscopy was used to evaluate the miscibility of polymers by changes in chemical bonds and groups between materials. The FTIR of films at 4000–400 cm−1 are presented in Figure 2. The main chain elements of the KGM/KC/nano-silica films and the KGM/KC films were similar to one another. The wide peaks at 3330 cm−1 correspond to the O–H stretching vibration, and the peaks at 2905 cm−1 can be attributed to the C–H stretching vibration of the clean KGM/KC film. We observed a similar occurrence in several other polysaccharides, such as chitosan and curdlan [29,30].
Major bands showed significant changes at 3400–3200 cm−1 with respect to the positions of different bands of films. For the KGM/KC film and the KGM/KC/nano-silica film, the strong absorption band was transferred to a low wave number. Specifically, the absorption peak of –OH of the KGM/KC/nano-silica film (S3) shifted to 3348 cm−1. This shift could be attributed to the hydrogen bonds that formed when the free –OH of nano-silica combined with that of KC/KGM, which was similar to the reports by Yao et al. (2011) [31]. In addition, the peaks around 1000 cm−1 was attributed to the bending vibration and stretching vibration of Si–O, Si–H, and Si–C, indicating that hydrogen bonds were formed between the nano-silica and KGM/KC in the films. The FTIR results indicated that the miscibility between KGM/KC and nano-silica was attributed to intermolecular hydrogen bonds and the synergistic interaction of polymers during film formation and blending [12].

3.2. XRD Analysis

XRD analysis can show the crystalline nature of films to characterize their compatibility. The XRD results of the KGM/KC films and the KGM/KC/nano-silica films are presented in Figure 3. A broad peak appeared near 22° for films with a small peak. A weak peak appeared at 30° which was attributed to inorganic salts, such as KCl in the KGM/KC films. The XRD pattern changed with the addition of nano-silica. The intensity of the sharp peak at 30° gradually decreased, and only the broad amorphous band was observed. The peak at 30° disappeared when 0.3% nano-silica was incorporated into the films once the salts involved in the interaction formed between KC and KGM. The diffraction peak of the KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) became lower and broader than the other films. The results indicated that 0.3% nano-silica could be easily distributed into the KGM/KC matrix and destroy the primal crystalline domains of KGM/KC and nano-silica [23]. XRD showed that nano-silica could possibly interact with KGM and KC because of the –OH or –COO– groups in KGM/KC and –OH on the surface of the nano-silica. Therefore, KC and KGM exhibited excellent compatibility with nano-silica in the films.

3.3. SEM Analysis

Many properties of materials in the films could be presented by the morphology of the top surface of the films. The morphological properties of the KGM/KC films and the KGM/KC/nano-silica films were determined by SEM, as shown in Figure 4. All KGM/KC/nano-silica films exhibited graininess, similar to the results obtained by Tang [32] and Wu [33]. With the increase in nano-silica, the size and amount of the particles were increased, and severe particle aggregation occurred at a nano-silica dosage of 0.5%. The particle aggregation was found to be able to limit the improvement of the properties of packing. This finding was consistent with the XRD and FTIR results, which indicated that KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) exhibited good dispersibility.

3.4. Color and Transparency Analysis

The colors of packaging materials are significant in fruits and vegetables because they directly influence consumer acceptability [34]. The total color differences (∆E) and transparency of the KGM/KC and KGM/KC/nano-silica films are listed in Table 1. The ∆E of films decreased, and then increased significantly (p < 0.05) with the nano-silica dosage. The color of the films exhibited the tendency to change into transparency. The color of films acceptable to consumers was obtained at a nano-silica content of 0.1%–0.3%. Ultraviolet light easily affects the quality of food products in food packaging. The opacity of films is also an important factor. High opacity indicates less transparency [35]. The transparency of the composite films decreased with the nano-silica content. The KGM/KC/nano-silica (S3) films exhibited the highest opacity, indicating that it could potentially enhance the UV-barrier property owing to the special optical effect of nano-silica [36]. The nano-silica with a wavelength smaller than that of light exerted certain optical effects. Therefore, ultraviolet light could not easily pass through the low-transparency film. In addition, the nanocomposite films exhibited low transparency with increasing nano-silica [30,37].

3.5. Tensile Strength Analysis

The Ts of the KGM/KC/nano-silica films increased with the addition of nano-silica, and then decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The optimal mechanical properties (69.11 MPa) were obtained at 0.3% nano-silica (Table 1). Excessive amounts of nano-silica might have led to a sharp decrease in the dispersion of nano-silica. The results were consistent with SEM.

3.6. Film Thickness Analysis

The thicknesses of the films showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) with the addition of nano-silica. Thickness uniformity can help examine the comprehensive performance of films.

3.7. WVTR Analysis

The WVTRs of the KGM/KC and KGM/KC/nano-silica films are summarized in Table 2. The KGM/KC/nano-silica films exhibited lower water vapor permeability (WVP) results than those of the KGM/KC films. Plasticizers could enhance the permeability of films, such as water vapor, gas, and solute permeability [38]. However, the number of plasticizers (glycerol) remained the same. Thus, the difference was attributed to the addition of nano-silica in the films. The results showed that the WVTR decreased with the addition of nano-silica and then increased significantly (p < 0.05). The optimal WVP (644.41 g·m−2·d−1) was obtained at 0.3% nano-silica. The dispersed nanoparticles changed the micropore structure of the KGM/KC films; thus, the WVTR decreased with the increase in nano-silica. However, when nano-silica content became excessive, some of the particles were severely agglomerated owing to non-uniform dispersion [38]. Nano-silica enhanced the physical crosslinking between KC and KGM, which changed the seepage path of water molecules in the films and suppressed the penetration of water.

3.8. WS and MA Analysis

The WS and MA of the KGM/KC and KGM/KC/nano-silica films are listed in Table 2. WS can be used to measure the films’ water resistance. The WS of the KGM/KC/nano-silica films decreased with an increase in nano-silica content. These results indicated that the KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) exhibited the highest water resistance. The hydrophilicity of the polymer could influence the WS of the films. MA was used to evaluate the moisture retention of the films and presented in reverse order. The MA of the KGM/KC/nano-silica films increased with an increase in nano-silica content, which could be attributed to the large amounts of –OH on the surface of the nano-silica and the hydrogen bonding between the nano-silica and water, thereby increasing the water-holding ratio of the nanocomposite films. Specifically, the MA of the KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) markedly increased to 297%. The reason for this could be that 0.3% nano-silica was better dispersed in the films than 0.4% nano-silica and 0.5% nano-silica to form the tight structure, which was supported by the SEM. Thus, an increase in film water resistance could be suitable for food packaging under highly humid conditions.

3.9. OTR and CDTR Analysis

Oxygen can cause many degradation reactions in foods, which shortens their shelf-life. Low oxygen permeability of food packaging materials was found to play a crucial role in preservation [39]. Table 2 shows that the gas transmission rate (OTR and CDTR) decreased with the addition of nano-silica. Among the films, the KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) exhibited the lowest OTR and CDTR. During packaging, a violent movement in the macromolecular chains of the films was observed, which was caused by the difference in pressure. Gas (O2 and CO2) passed through the channel and were released from the side with low partial pressure [12] Nano-silica at 0.3% was dispersed evenly, which changed the micropore structure of the KGM/KC films, allowing the adjustment of O2–CO2 exchange by the Si-O-Si groups of nano-silica in the films.

3.10. Application of Films for Mushroom Storage Stability

The storage stability of the films was evaluated by using them to pack fresh white mushrooms. These mushrooms were packaged using the KGM/KC and KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3). The mushrooms with packaging without any film at 4 ± 1 °C was considered as the control group. After a storage period of 12 d, the appearance of the treated mushrooms was evaluated (Figure 5). The mushrooms in the control packaging appeared to have severely wilted. Agaricus bisporus packed using the KGM/KC films had significantly wilted, whereas those packed using the KGM/KC/nano-silica films remained fresh on the surface.
Changes in the weight loss, whiteness, firmness, and membrane permeability of the mushroom samples are illustrated in Figure 6. The weight loss and membrane permeability of the control samples were the greatest, whereas those of the mushrooms treated with the KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) were the least. The reason for this was mainly that the WVP of the KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) was lower than that of the KGM/KC films. Moreover, the whiteness and firmness of the samples treated with the KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) were of the highest degree (Figure 6). A reason for this could be that the silicon–oxygen bond in the KGM/KC/nano-silica films could have affected the absorption, dissolution, diffusion, and release of CO2/O2. The CO2/O2 exchange capacity inside and outside the films could be adjusted to inhibit the respiration of mushrooms.
The hardness, fracturability, adhesiveness, and stringiness of the mushrooms were measured to study the change in their texture. For the mushroom samples, the fracturability, hardness, and springiness were reduced because of senescence and metabolism. As shown in Figure 7, the mushrooms treated with the KGM/KC/nano-silica films exhibited significantly higher levels of hardness and fracturability (p < 0.05) compared with other treatments. The lowest levels of hardness and fracturability for the control group were obtained on Day 12 of storage. Meanwhile, the adhesiveness and stringiness of the samples packaged with the KGM/KC/nano-silica films decreased (Figure 7). The effect of the KGM/KC/ nano-silica films on the quality preservation of white mushrooms could be attributed to the slow metabolic activity and low respiration, which delayed senescence. The nano-silica polymer films formed a super-semipermeable film around the mushrooms, which changed the internal atmosphere by increasing CO2 and reducing O2, thus inhibiting ethylene evolution [40].

4. Conclusions

In this study, the properties of a blend biopolymer film added with nano-silica at varying proportions were investigated. The nano-silica dosage affected the properties of the nanocomposite KGM/KC films. The water vapor permeability, water solubility, moisture absorption, and light transmittance of KGM/KC/nano-silica films were significantly affected by the nano-silica dosage. The optimal nano-silica dosage that had to be incorporated into the films in order to achieve excellent performances was 0.3%. Strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds were also observed between KGM/KC and nano-silica in the KGM/KC/nano-silica film by FTIR. The KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3) showed a tendency to extend the shelf life of fresh Agaricus bisporus from 5 d to 12 d, maintaining their whiteness, visual appearance, and hardness. The KGM/KC/nano-silica films involved simple processing and exhibited industrial feasibility. Therefore, the KGM/KC/nano-silica films in the packaging of Agaricus bisporus was found to be able to control postharvest metabolism and senescence to extend the mushrooms’ shelf-life and maintain their quality. The films can provide a potential alternative to conventional food packaging, and the development of the KGM/KC/nano-silica films can also broaden the application of nanotechnology in the food industry.

Author Contributions

R.Z. designed the experiments. R.Z. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. X.W. revised the manuscript and the Funding Acquisition. J.W. and M.C. performed the part of “Application of films for mushroom storage stability”.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 31301819 and 30871757.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Analysis and Testing Center, Shandong University of Technology for providing the experimental equipment used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Crini, G. Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2005, 30, 38–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Persin, Z.; Stana-Kleinschek, K.; Foster, T.J.; Van Dam, J.E.G.; Boeriu, C.G.; Navard, P. Challenges and opportunities in polysaccharides research and technology: The EPNOE views for the next decade in the areas of materials, food and health care. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Aziz, M.S.; Salama, H.E.; Sabaa, M.W. Biobased alginate/castor oil edible films for active food packaging. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 96, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cheng, L.H.; Abd Karim, A.; Seow, C.C. Characterisation of composite films made of konjac glucomannan (KGM), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and lipid. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pang, J.; Lin, B.; Zhang, P.S.; Tian, S.P.; Sun, Y.J. Progress in the Application and Studies on Functional Material of Konjac Glucomannan. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2003, 22, 633–642. [Google Scholar]
  6. Thành, T.T.T.; Yuguchi, Y.; Mimura, M.; Yasunaga, H.; Takano, R.; Urakawa, H. Molecular Characteristics and Gelling Properties of the Carrageenan Family, 1. Preparation of Novel Carrageenans and their Dilute Solution Properties. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002, 203, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Johnston, J.H.; Grindrod, J.E.; Dodds, M.; Schimitschek, K.C. Composite nano-structured calcium silicate phase change materials for thermal buffering in food packaging. Appl. Phys. 2008, 8, 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jafari, S.M.; Assadpoor, E.; Bhandari, B.; He, Y.H. Nano-particle encapsulation of fish oil by spray drying. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Taira, S.; Sahashi, Y. Nanoparticle-assisted laser desorption/ionization (nano-PALDI) mass spectrometry for food analysis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 108, S155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, G.H.; Hoppe, S.; Feng, F.; Fonteix, C. Nano-scale phenomena and applications in polymer processing. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 3528–3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rhim, J.W.J.; Lee, S.B.; Hong, S.I. Preparation and characterization of agar/clay nanocomposite films: The effect of clay type. Food Sci. 2011, 76, N40–N48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sun, T.; Wu, C.L.; Hao, H.; Dai, Y.; Li, J.R. Preparation and preservation properties of the chitosan coatings modified with the in situ, synthesized nano SiOx. Food Hydrocolloid. 2016, 54, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahmadizadegan, H. Surface modification of TiO2 nanoparticles with biodegradable nanocellolose and synthesis of novel polyimide/cellulose/TiO2 membrane. J. Colloid Interfaces Sci. 2017, 491, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Akhavan, A.; Khoylou, F.; Ataeivarjovi, E. Preparation and characterization of gamma irradiated Starch/PVA/ZnO nanocomposite films. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017, 138, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. U.S. Food and Drug Adminastration. Food Additive Status List; U.S. Food and Drug Adminastration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2011.
  16. Abbasi, Z. Water resistance, weight loss and enzymatic degradation of blends starch/polyvinyl alcohol containing SiO2 nanoparticle. J. Taiwan Chem. Eng. 2012, 43, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lei, Z.L.; Bi, S.X.; Yang, H. Chitosan-tethered the silica particle from a layer-by-layer approach for pectinase immobilization. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yan, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, H.; Chen, N.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W.J. Effects of oligo chitosan on postharvest Alternaria rot, storage quality, and defense responses in Chinese jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Mill. cv. Dongzao) fruit. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, R.F.; Wang, X.Y.; Li, L.; Cheng, M.; Zhang, L.M. Optimization of konjac glucomannan/carrageenan/nano-SiO2 coatings for extending the shelf-life of Agaricus bisporus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wu, C.H.; Peng, S.H.; Wen, C.R.; Wang, X.M.; Fan, L.L.; Deng, R.H.; Pang, J. Structural characterization and properties of konjac glucomannan/curdlan blend films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, L.; Xiao, M.; Dai, S.H.; Song, J.; Ni, X.W.; Fang, Y.P.; Corke, H.; Jiang, F.T. Interactions between carboxymethyl konjac glucomannan and soy protein isolate in blended films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, G.L.; Sheng, L.; Tong, Q.Y. Preparation and characterization of carboxymethyl-gellan and pullulan blend films. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hassannia-Kolaee, M.; Khodaiyan, F.; Pourahmad, R.; Ghahfarrokhi, I.S. Development of ecofriendly bionanocomposite: Whey protein isolate/pullulan films with nano-SiO2. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 86, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rhim, J.W.; Hong, S.I.; Park, H.M.; Ng, P.K.W. Preparation and characterization of chitosan-based nanocomposite films with antimicrobial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 5814–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Moreno, O.; Cárdenas, J.; Atarés, L.; Chiralt, A. Influence of starch oxidation on the functionality of starch-gelatin based active films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 178, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, Z.L.; Wang, X.Y.; Zhu, J.Y.; Wang, J. Effect of high oxygen modified atmosphere on post-harvest physiology and sensorial qualities of mushroom. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, J.; Lv, Y.; Mo, X.; Duan, S.; Tong, Q. Effects of freezing and thawing treatment on the rheological and textural characteristics and micro-structure of heat-induced egg yolk gels. J. Food Eng. 2018, 216, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, T.; Guo, X.; Zhu, K.; Zhou, H. Effects of alkali on protein polymerization and textural characteristics of textured wheat protein. Food Chem. 2018, 239, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jin, Y.; Zhang, H.B.; Yin, Y.M.; Nishinari, K. Comparison of curdlan and its carboxymethylated derivative by means of Rheology, DSC, and AFM. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.Z.; Lv, M.Z.; Li, P.W.; Xu, H.L.; Wang, L. Preparation and characterization of novel curdlan/chitosan blending membranes for antibacterial applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yao, K.; Caia, J.; Liu, M. Structure and properties of starch/PVA/nano-silica hybrid films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1784–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tong, Q.; Xiao, Q.; Lim, L.T. Preparation and properties of pullulan-alginate-carboxymethylcellulose blend films. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, J.; Zhong, F.; Li, Y.; Shoemaker, C.F.; Xia, W. Preparation and characterization of pullulan–chitosan and pullulan–carboxymethyl chitosan blended films. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 30, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdollahi, M.; Alboofetileh, M.; Rezaei, M.; Behrooz, R. Comparing physico-mechanical and thermal properties of alginate nanocomposite films reinforced with organic and/or inorganic nanofillers. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 32, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lizundia, E.; Vilas, J.L.; Sangroniz, A.; Etxeberria, A. Light and gas barrier properties of PLLA/metallic nanoparticles composite films. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 91, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chaichana, E.; Jongsomjit, B.; Praserthdam, P. Effect of nano-SiO2, particle size on the formation of LLDPE/SiO2, nanocomposite synthesized via the in situ polymerization with metallocene catalyst. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiong, H.G.; Tang, S.W.; Tang, H.W. The structure and properties of a starch-based biodegradable film. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 71, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gontard, N.; Guilbert, S.; Cuq, J.L. Water and Glycerol as Plasticizers Affect Mechanical and Water Vapor Barrier Properties of an Edible Wheat Gluten Film. J. Food Sci. 1993, 58, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guerrero, P.; Hanani, Z.A.N.; Kerry, J.P.; Caba, K.D.L. Characterization of soy protein-based films prepared with acids and oils by compression. J. Food Eng. 2011, 107, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tabatabaei, R.H.; Jafari, S.M.; Mirzaei, H.; Nafchi, A.M.; Dehnad, D. Preparation and characterization of nano-SiO2 reinforced gelatin-k-carrageenan biocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 111, 1091–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the films’ preparation, and (b) the structure of the obtained films.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the films’ preparation, and (b) the structure of the obtained films.
Polymers 11 00006 g001
Figure 2. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of blend films (CK: 0% nano-silica; S1: 0.1% nano-silica; S2: 0.2% nano-silica; S3: 0.3% nano-silica; S4: 0.4% nano-silica; S5: 0.5% nano-silica).
Figure 2. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of blend films (CK: 0% nano-silica; S1: 0.1% nano-silica; S2: 0.2% nano-silica; S3: 0.3% nano-silica; S4: 0.4% nano-silica; S5: 0.5% nano-silica).
Polymers 11 00006 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction (XRD) of konjac glucomannan (KGM)/carrageenan (KC)/nano-silica films and KGM/KC films (CK: 0% nano-silica; S1: 0.1% nano-silica; S2: 0.2% nano-silica; S3: 0.3% nano-silica; S4: 0.4% nano-silica; S5: 0.5% nano-silica).
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction (XRD) of konjac glucomannan (KGM)/carrageenan (KC)/nano-silica films and KGM/KC films (CK: 0% nano-silica; S1: 0.1% nano-silica; S2: 0.2% nano-silica; S3: 0.3% nano-silica; S4: 0.4% nano-silica; S5: 0.5% nano-silica).
Polymers 11 00006 g003
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of KGM/KC films (CK) and KGM/KC/nano-silica films with different nano-silica dosages. (CK: 0% nano-silica; S1: 0.1% nano-silica; S2: 0.2% nano-silica; S3: 0.3% nano-silica; S4:0.4% nano-silica; S5:0.5% nano-silica).
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of KGM/KC films (CK) and KGM/KC/nano-silica films with different nano-silica dosages. (CK: 0% nano-silica; S1: 0.1% nano-silica; S2: 0.2% nano-silica; S3: 0.3% nano-silica; S4:0.4% nano-silica; S5:0.5% nano-silica).
Polymers 11 00006 g004
Figure 5. Effect of film packaging with Agaricus bisporus stored at 4 ± 1 °C for 12 d (1: CK; 2: mushrooms packaged with KGM/KC films; 3: mushrooms packaged with KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3)).
Figure 5. Effect of film packaging with Agaricus bisporus stored at 4 ± 1 °C for 12 d (1: CK; 2: mushrooms packaged with KGM/KC films; 3: mushrooms packaged with KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3)).
Polymers 11 00006 g005
Figure 6. Effect of the films packaged with Agaricus bisporus stored at 4 ± 1 °C for 12 d (1: CK; 2: mushrooms packaged with KGM/KC films; 3: mushrooms packaged with KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3)).
Figure 6. Effect of the films packaged with Agaricus bisporus stored at 4 ± 1 °C for 12 d (1: CK; 2: mushrooms packaged with KGM/KC films; 3: mushrooms packaged with KGM/KC/nano-silica films (S3)).
Polymers 11 00006 g006
Figure 7. Effects of Agaricus bisporus on sensory evaluation by using different treatments during the storage period.
Figure 7. Effects of Agaricus bisporus on sensory evaluation by using different treatments during the storage period.
Polymers 11 00006 g007
Table 1. The total color differences ∆E, transparency, and Ts of KGM/KC films and KGM/KC/nano-silica films.
Table 1. The total color differences ∆E, transparency, and Ts of KGM/KC films and KGM/KC/nano-silica films.
FilmsET600nm (%)Ts (MPa)
CK4.02 ± 0.05 a90.36 ± 0.35 a50.63 ± 2.1 f
S13.81 ± 0.21 ab83.21 ± 0.24 b61.32 ± 1.3 e
S23.32 ± 0.02 c80.13 ± 0.15 c63.51 ± 3.2 d
S32.67 ± 0.22 f73.91 ± 0.17 f69.11 ± 1.5 a
S42.98 ± 0.01 e74.45 ± 0.21 e67.22 ± 1.1 c
S53.19 ± 0.13 d75.32 ± 0.09 d68.01 ± 2.7 b
Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) within the columns.
Table 2. Thickness, water vapor permeability (WVP), water solubility (WS), moisture absorption (MA), oxygen transmission rate (OTR), and carbon dioxide transmission rate (CDTR) of films.
Table 2. Thickness, water vapor permeability (WVP), water solubility (WS), moisture absorption (MA), oxygen transmission rate (OTR), and carbon dioxide transmission rate (CDTR) of films.
FilmsThickness (μm)WVP (g·m−2·d−1)WS (%)MA (%)OTR (g·m−2·d−1CDTR (g·m−2·d−1)
CK26.4 ± 0.48 a806.4 ± 9.12 a80.1 ± 0.71 a176.4 ± 5.88 f0.039 ± 0.002 f0.238 ± 0.011 f
S125.9 ± 0.31 a696.3 ± 5.22 d68.7 ± 0.85 b213.1 ± 6.17 e0.030 ± 0.001 e0.204 ± 0.016 cd
S226.3 ± 0.26 a662.0 ± 3.78 e61.3 ± 0.32 c271.2 ± 4.12 d0.023 ± 0.003 b0.198 ± 0.008 bc
S325.6 ± 0.33 a644.4 ± 1.44 f52.4 ± 0.41 f297.3 ± 3.25 a0.016 ± 0.002 a0.153 ± 0.021 a
S426.9 ± 0.21 a743.6 ± 2.32 c59.2 ± 0.56 cd280.5 ± 1.36 c0.026 ± 0.001 c0.187 ± 0.009 b
S526.2 ± 0.39 a783.8 ± 4.26 b58.4 ± 0.38 de286.1 ± 2.47 b0.028 ± 0.002 cd0.206 ± 0.006 de
Values are means ± standard deviation. The different letters in a column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Cheng, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Konjac Glucomannan/Carrageenan/Nano-silica Films for the Preservation of Postharvest White Mushrooms. Polymers 2019, 11, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010006

AMA Style

Zhang R, Wang X, Wang J, Cheng M. Synthesis and Characterization of Konjac Glucomannan/Carrageenan/Nano-silica Films for the Preservation of Postharvest White Mushrooms. Polymers. 2019; 11(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Rongfei, Xiangyou Wang, Juan Wang, and Meng Cheng. 2019. "Synthesis and Characterization of Konjac Glucomannan/Carrageenan/Nano-silica Films for the Preservation of Postharvest White Mushrooms" Polymers 11, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010006

APA Style

Zhang, R., Wang, X., Wang, J., & Cheng, M. (2019). Synthesis and Characterization of Konjac Glucomannan/Carrageenan/Nano-silica Films for the Preservation of Postharvest White Mushrooms. Polymers, 11(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop