Next Article in Journal
Barium/Cobalt@Polyethylene Glycol Nanocomposites for Dye Removal from Aqueous Solutions
Next Article in Special Issue
Structure/Properties Relationship of Anionically Synthesized Diblock Copolymers “Grafted to” Chemically Modified Graphene
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Research Progress on Lignin-Derived Resins for Natural Fiber Composite Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nano-Assemblies from Amphiphilic PnBA-b-POEGA Copolymers as Drug Nanocarriers

by
Angeliki Chroni
1,
Thomas Mavromoustakos
2 and
Stergios Pispas
1,*
1
Theoretical and Physical Chemistry Institute, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 48 Vassileos Constantinou Avenue, 11635 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, 15771 Zografou, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(7), 1164; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071164
Submission received: 19 March 2021 / Revised: 31 March 2021 / Accepted: 31 March 2021 / Published: 5 April 2021

Abstract

:
The focus of this study is the development of highly stable losartan potassium (LSR) polymeric nanocarriers. Two novel amphiphilic poly(n-butyl acrylate)-block-poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate) (PnBA-b-POEGA) copolymers with different molecular weight (Mw) of PnBA are synthesized via reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, followed by the encapsulation of LSR into both PnBA-b-POEGA micelles. Based on dynamic light scattering (DLS), the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 (where the subscripts denote wt.% composition of the components) copolymers formed micelles of 10 nm and 24 nm in water. The LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers presented increased size and greater mass nanostructures compared to empty micelles, implying the successful loading of LSR into the inner hydrophobic domains. A thorough NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) characterization of the LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers was conducted. Strong intermolecular interactions between the biphenyl ring and the butyl chain of LSR with the methylene signals of PnBA were evidenced by 2D-NOESY experiments. The highest hydrophobicity of the PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles contributed to an efficient encapsulation of LSR into the micelles exhibiting a greater value of %EE compared to PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers. Ultrasound release profiles of LSR signified that a great amount of the encapsulated LSR is strongly attached to both PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles.

1. Introduction

Nano-drug delivery systems (NDDSs) have revolutionized drug delivery in the last few decades, endowing drugs with increased stability and water solubility, prolonging the cycle time, enhancing the uptake rate of target cells or tissues, reducing enzyme degradation, and controlling the release of the drug [1,2,3,4].
The NDDSs used in modern biomedicine concern supramolecular self-assembled structures divided into organic, inorganic, and composite materials. Amphiphilic block copolymers (AmBCs) have been the workhorse of pharmaceutical nanotechnology in recent years towards the design of drug-loaded block copolymer nanocarriers for the demanding treatment of crucial diseases [5,6,7,8]. The delivery of drugs, proteins, and nucleotides is possible via AmBCs self-assembled into biocompatible nanostructured multifunctional structures such as micelles, polymer containing liposomes, or polymeric nanoparticles [9].
A multitude of applications in nanomedicine and diagnostics are powered by AmBCs [10,11,12]. The unique core-shell architecture of AmBC nanoassemblies enables a physical encapsulation of drug molecules into their hydrophobic micellar core, conferring an enhanced drug solubility and reduced toxicity. The hydrophilic shell stabilizes the core, ameliorates drug pharmacokinetics, and facilitates drug accumulation in tumors through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [13,14].
Poly[oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate)] (POEGMA) and poly[oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate)] (POEGA) are hydrophilic biocompatible polymers due to their oligo(ethylene glycol) (OEG) side groups. To date, several scientific works have utilized POEG[M]A blocks for the formation of micelles from AmBCs [15,16,17]. Moreover, the OEG fragment endows polymeric systems with “stealth” properties, preventing their recognition by the immune system [18,19].
The stability of AmBC micelles in serum media is vital to their use in drug delivery, where dilution after intravenous injection usually elicits micellar disassembly and drug unloading [20,21]. To the best of our knowledge, few studies are focused on investigating the colloidal and physicochemical stability of polymeric micelles in biological fluids. To date, highly skilled, often time-consuming, and expensive techniques are usually applied for the elucidation of protein–polymer interactions, including surface plasmon resonance, in situ ellipsometry, total internal reflection fluorescence spectroscopy, ATR-FTIR (attenuated total reflection Fourier transform), etc. [22,23,24]. Hence, a simple, quick, and cost-effective method is needed for the investigation of the stability of polymeric micelles in a biological environment by detecting potential alterations of their physicochemical characteristics in serum proteins.
A well-known industrial and environmental technique that places great promise in the fields of materials science and medicine for producing complex polymers and polymeric nanoparticles with controlled molecular weight (Mw) and narrow molecular weight distributions (Mw/Mn) is reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT) [25].
Block copolymer nano-assemblies obtained via RAFT enable a physical encapsulation of hydrophobic therapeutics into their hydrophobic micellar core. Sartans medicines have been developed in parallel as additional therapeutics for the rennin–angiotensin system (RAS), including new antihypertensive drugs (losartan, valsartan, candesartan, irbesartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, eprosartan, azilsartan), which compete with the hypertensive action of the vasoconstrictor hormone angiotensin II (ANG II) at the ANG II type 1 (AT1) receptor site, modulating the RAS [26,27,28,29,30]. Losartan potassium (LSR) is an ANG II receptor blocker whose major capability relies on hypertension treatment [31,32]. Yet, few studies have shed any light on the association of LSR with malignancy by reporting that the encapsulation of LSR in peptide hydrogels and liposomes ameliorates the efficacy of chemotherapy and highlighting its use in reducing breast cancer recurrence [33,34,35]. AT1 antagonists, however, meet formidable challenges regarding their lipophilicity. Block copolymer nanocarriers come to the rescue, increasing the bioavailability of AT1 antagonists.
Hitherto, the examination of micelle structure and polymer–drug intermolecular interactions using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is scarce in existing research for rational polymeric nanocarrier design and drug encapsulation [26,36]. According to our previous work, NMR spectroscopy proved a robust tool for the structural elucidation of the micelles and the detection of the intra- and intermolecular interactions between the copolymer and the drug [37].
Here, two novel biocompatible AmBCs with different Mw of PnBA, namely poly(n-butyl acrylate)-block-poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate) (PnBA-b-POEGA), are synthesized using RAFT polymerization. Νovel drug delivery nanocarriers are subsequently developed by encapsulating LSR into PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 (where the subscripts denote wt.% composition of the components) diblock copolymers. The assessment of critical micelle concentration (CMC), size, shape, surface potential, and structure of the PnBA-b-POEGA diblocks and LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers were determined using a variety of techniques. The LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers (20 wt.% and 50 wt.% concentration of LSR in the mixture) were prepared using the thin film hydration method (TFHM), and they are referred in the text as PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR, PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR, PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR. The stability in fetal bovine serum (FBS) of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles was examined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) to gain further insight into the protein–polymer interactions. A plethora of NMR experiments were performed to explore the intramolecular interactions between the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles and LSR, and to discover the self-diffusion coefficients D of the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers. Moreover, temperature studies using 1H-NMR spectroscopy for the POEGA hydrophilic homopolymer and the PnBA-b-POEGA micelles over the temperature range 25–80 °C were further conducted to trace the mobility of protons located in the hydrophobic PnBA micellar core. At last, drug loading (DL%) and encapsulation efficiency (%EE) were calculated by means of ultraviolet visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, followed by the ultrasound-triggered release of LSR from PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The following materials were used in our study: n-butyl acrylate, (nBA, 99%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate (OEGA, 98%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece) with average Μw = 480 g/mol, 2,2-Azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN, 98% Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), 2-(dodecylthiocarbonothioylthio)-2-methylpropionic acid (DDMAT, 98% Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), pyrene (Py, 98%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), losartan potassium (LSR, 99.8%, Rafarm, Athens, Greece), 1,4-dioxane (99.8%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), n-hexane (Hx, 97%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), tetrahydrofuran (THF, 99.9%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), acetone (ACTN, 99.5%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), methanol (MeOH, 99.9%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), phosphate-buffered saline tablets (PBS, 98%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), water for injection (WFI, 99%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece), and deuterium oxide (D2O, 99%, Sigma-Alrdrich, Athens, Greece).

2.2. Synthesis of PnBA-b-POEGA Diblock Copolymers

The hydrophobic PnBA homopolymers were synthesized in 4000 and 7800 g/mol Mw variations in a previous work, and used as macro-CTAs for commencing the subsequent polymerization of the OEGA monomer [38].
The synthesis of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 block copolymers involved AIBN as the initiator, PnBA (4000 and 7800 g/mol) homopolymers as the macro-CTAs, and 1,4-dioxane as the solvent. A typical RAFT polymerization procedure for the synthesis of the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock in 4000 molar mass of PnBA is described as follows: to a round-bottom flask, 25 mL, PnBA (0.38 g), AIBN (0.00314 g, 0.019 mmol), OEGA (480 g/mol, 0.89 g), and 6.4 mL of 1,4-dioxane were added with a magnetic stirrer and fitted with a septum. The final solution was degassed by nitrogen gas bubbling for 15 min and placed in a thermostatted oil bath at 70 °C for 24 h. After the polymerization reaction, the product was precipitated in 10-fold excess of n-hexane and dried in a vacuum oven for 48 h (yield: 65%). The dry PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock was collected and stored.

2.3. Preparation of Self-Assembled PnBA-b-POEGA Diblock Copolymers

Despite the fact that PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 block copolymers are dissolved directly in aqueous media, their micelles were prepared using the thin film hydration method (TFHM). The contradiction is explained as LSR-loaded nanocarriers were also prepared with TFHM (more details are given in Section 2.5). Specifically, 10 mg of each diblock was dissolved in ACTN (stock solution) and allowed to stand for polymer dissolution. Afterwards, each polymer stock solution was transferred into a flask and placed in a rotary evaporator for the efficient evaporation of ACTN until a thin film of each polymer was formed around the inner part of the flask. When the thin film was formed, 10 mL filtered water for injection (WFI) was added to the flask and stirred until the entire thin film was dissolved. The concentration of the aqueous stock solutions was 10−3 g/mol.

2.4. FBS Interactions with PnBA-b-POEGA Diblock Copolymers

The mixtures of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 copolymers with clarified FBS were prepared in filtered PBS using two protocols based on different polymer dilution to FBS and different FBS:PBS ratios. The copolymer stock solutions were prepared with direct dissolution in filtered WFI at a concentration of 3 × 10−3 g/mL for both protocols. According to the first protocol, 50 μL of each diblock was mixed with 3 mL FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) ratio. The second protocol included the mixing of 100 μL sample with (a) 3 mL FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) ratio and (b) 3 mL FBS:PBS (1/1 v/v). All FBS-copolymer mixtures were filtered through 0.45 μm pore size filters and allowed to stand 1 h for equilibration before DLS measurements.

2.5. Preparation of LSR-Loaded PnBA-b-POEGA Nanocarriers

The LSR-loaded PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR, PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR, PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers were prepared using the TFHM. Specifically, an appropriate amount of LSR was dissolved in ACTN to prepare 20 wt.% and 50 wt.% concentrations of LSR in each copolymer–drug mixture. Afterwards, each copolymer and LSR stock solution was mixed in the appropriate amounts. Each copolymer–drug mixture was transferred into a flask and placed in a rotary evaporator for the efficient evaporation of ACTN until a thin film of each copolymer and LSR was formed around the inner walls of the flask. Then, 5 mL filtered WFI was added to the flask and stirred until the entire thin film was dissolved. The concentrations of the aqueous stock solutions were 10−3 g/mol. All copolymer and drug-loaded solutions were filtered through 0.45 μm pore size filters and allowed to stand overnight for equilibration before measurements. A schematic illustration for the preparation of LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers using the TFHM is proposed in Scheme 1.

2.6. Drug Loading and Encapsulation Efficiency Calculations of LSR

The percentage of LSR incorporated into PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers was estimated by UV-Vis (Perkin-Elmer, Lambda 19 spectrophotometer, Waltham, MA, USA) spectroscopy. LSR concentration was calculated with the aid of the following LSR calibration curve in ACTN, which was on the general form y = ax + b (where a is the slope and b is the intercept):
LSR concentration (g/mL) = (y − 0.22504)/98,462.16599
The absorbance (y) of the drug–polymer solutions was measured at 205 nm. %DL is the amount of drug loaded per unit weight of the micelle/nanoparticle, and is calculated by the amount of total entrapped drug divided by the total micelle/nanoparticle weight. %EE is the percentage of drug that is successfully entrapped into the micelle/nanoparticle, and is calculated by the total encapsulated drug divided by the total drug added. %DL %EE were calculated using the following Equations:
%DL = [encapsulated drug/total micelles weight (initial)] × 100
%EE = [encapsulated drug/total drug added (initial)] × 100

2.7. Ultrasound Release Studies

The release of LSR from PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles was studied in WFI in an ultrasonic bath sonicator for approximately five hours. Specifically, 5 mL of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers were added in dialysis bags of 3.5 kDa MWDO. Afterwards, the dialysis bags were inserted into 100 mL filtered WFI and placed in a SOLTEC, SONICA 3300ETH-S3 ultrasonic bath. Aliquots of samples were taken from the external solution at specific time intervals and each time the aqueous solution was restored to its initial volume, so that the reservoir conditions remained constant. On the basis of the calibration curve of the Equation (1), the amount of LSR released at different time intervals, up to 5 h, was determined using UV-Vis (Perkin-Elmer, Lambda 19 spectrophotometer, Waltham, MA, USA) spectroscopy at λmax = 205 nm.

2.8. NMR Sample Preparation

For the temperature dependent NMR studies of POEGA homopolymer, PnBA30-b-POEGA70, and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 block copolymers, the solutions were prepared as follows: 2 mg of each diblock was directly dissolved in 0.7 mL D2O. The PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers were prepared by TFHM in D2O solutions as follows: 1 mg of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock was dissolved in 1 mL D2O. The partitioning of the drug in the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles was studied by adding an appropriate amount of LSR (to prepare 50 wt.% concentration of LSR) into the final copolymer–drug mixture.

2.9. Evaluation

Mw and Mw/Mn of the synthesized PnBA-b-POEGA block copolymers were determined by a size exclusion chromatography (SEC) instrument from Waters Technologies Corporation, Caguas, Puerto Rico. It was equipped with a Waters 1515 isocratic pump, a set of three μ-Styragel mixed bed columns (porosity range between 102 to 106 Å), and a Waters 2414 refractive index detector (equilibrated at 40 °C). Breeze software was utilized for data acquisition and analysis. THF containing 5% v/v triethylamine was the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 30 °C. The setup was calibrated with linear polystyrene standards, having narrow Mw/Mn and weight average Mw in the range of 1200 to 929,000 g/mol. Concentrations in the range 2–4 mg/mL were used for analysis.
NMR studies at different temperatures of PnBA-b-POEGA copolymers were carried out on a Varian 300 MHz NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard and D2O as the solvent. The copolymer compositions were also determined by 1H-NMR on a Varian 300 MHz spectrometer, using CDCl3 as the selective solvent. The composition of PnBA-b-POEGA block copolymers was calculated using the characteristics spectral peaks at 0.92 ppm, which corresponds to the –CH3 protons of PnBA side chain (3H, CH3), and 3.64 ppm, which corresponds to the –(CH2)9 protons of POEGA group [36H, (CH2-CH2)9]. 1H-NMR spectrum peaks of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ) consist of: 4.17 (g, 2H, CH2) POEGA side group, 4.02 (c, 2H, CH2) PnBA side chain, 3.64 (h, 2H, CH2) POEGA side chain, 3.37 (j, 3H, CH3) POEGA side chain, and 2.28 (b, 1H, CH); and 1.89 (a, 2H, CH2) PnBA and POEGA main chain, 1.58 (d, 2H, CH2) PnBA side chain, 1.37 (e, 2H, CH2) PnBA side chain, and 0.92 (f, 3H, CH3) PnBA side chain.
1H-NMR spectroscopy studies of PnBA-b-POEGA micelles and LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers were performed on a 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) operated by Vjnmr rev. 3.2A software and with a 5 mm HCN cold probe. Tetramethylsilane (TMS) was the internal standard used, and D2O was the solvent. 1H NMR spectra were recorded with 65,536 points, 90° pulse, 10 s relaxation delay, and 32 repetitions. Correlated spectroscopy (2D-COSY), Overhauser (2D-NOESY), and diffusion-ordered (2D-DOSY) experiments were reported on a 600 MHz NMR spectrometer. NOESY spectra were recorded at different mixing times with 4096 × 200 points, 1 s relaxation delay, and 32 repetitions per spectrum. The DgcsteSL cc sequence was used to record DOSY spectra with 65,536 points, 1 s relaxation delay, and 16 repetitions. Twenty-four gradient strengths between 0 and 60 gauss/cm were used. All spectra were recorded at 25 °C. Chemical shifts are referenced with respect to the lock frequency and reported relative to TMS.
Fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) experiments were pursued to determine the CMC of the PnBA-b-POEGA block copolymers using a Fluorolog-3 Jobin Yvon-Spex spectrofluorometer, model GL3–21 (HORIBA Scientific, Piscataway, NJ, USA) with pyrene as the fluorescent probe. A stock solution of 1 mM Py in ACTN was prepared and added to the solutions in a ratio of 1 μL per 1 mL polymer solution. The excitation wavelength used for the measurements was 335 nm and emission spectra were recorded in the region of 355–630 nm. Measurements were conducted after the evaporation of ACTN overnight at room temperature.
DLS measurements were performed using an ALV/CGS-3 Compact Goniometer System (ALV GmbH, Siemensstraße 4, 63225 Langen, Hessen, Germany) with an ALV-5000/EPP multi-τ digital correlator with 288 channels and an ALV/LSE-5003 light scattering electronic unit for stepper motor drive and limit switch control. A JDS Uniphase 22-mW He–Ne laser (632.8 nm) was used as the light source. The size data and figures provided in the manuscript are from averaged measurements at 90 degrees, (five measurements per concentration/angle). The obtained correlation functions were analyzed by the cumulants method and CONTIN software (ALVGmbH, Hessen, Germany). All solutions were filtered through 0.45 μm hydrophilic PTFE filters (Millex-LCR from Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) before measurements. Static light scattering (SLS) measurements were carried out on the same instrument at the same temperature and angular range as in DLS measurements, using toluene as the calibration standard. All samples were prepared at a concentration of 1 × 10−3 g/mL. SLS data were determined using Zimm plots.
A ZetaSizer Nanoseries Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) was used for the electrophoretic light scattering (ELS) measurements, equipped with a 4 mW solid-state laser at a wavelength of 633 nm and a fixed backscattering angle of 173°. The reported ζ-potential (ζpot) values are the average values of 50 runs, utilizing the Henry approximation of the Smoluchowski equation after equilibration at 25 °C.
UV−Vis absorption spectra of the LSR, LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers, and aqueous solutions of the released LSR were recorded between a 200 and 600 nm wavelength using a Perkin Elmer (Lambda 19) UV–Vis–NIR spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA). The LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers were diluted to get an absorbance value of less than 1. It is notable that the absorption at 254 nm and 228 nm was related to the presence of LSR, and not to the copolymer based on measurements on the pure components.
Mid-infrared (IR) spectra of LSR, PnBA-b-POEGA micelles, and LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers were recorded in the region of 550–4000 cm−1 on an Equinox 55 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a single reflection diamond ATR accessory (DuraSamp1IR II by SensIR Technologies, Chapel Hill, NC, USA).
Observed ATR-FTIR spectral peaks of PnBA-b-POEGA micelles were: v (cm−1) = 2700–3000 (–CH–), 1730 (–C=O–), 1455 (–CH2–), 1355 (–CH3–), 1107 and 1250 (–C–O–C–), 945, and 850 (–CH2–).

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis and Molecular Characterization of PnBA-b-POEGA Diblock Copolymers

Two amphiphilic PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 diblock copolymers were synthesized with different Mw of a PnBA block. The PnBA segment enables the formation of equilibrated micellar structures in aqueous media in most cases [39,40,41]. In the current study, the previously synthesized PnBA homopolymers (in 4000 and 7800 g/mol Mw variations) [38] were used as macro-CTAs to commence the polymerization of the OEGA. The employment of DDMAT as the CTA leads to polymers with well-controlled Mw and Mw/Mn [25,42,43]. The synthetic route of PnBA-b-POEGA copolymers using RAFT polymerization and the chemical structures of the diblocks and LSR are presented in Scheme 2 and Scheme 3. Polymerization of OEGA proceeded in 65% yield. The molecular characteristics of PnBA and PnBA-b-POEGA copolymers determined by SEC and 1H-NMR spectroscopy are provided in Table 1. The obtained Mw were in agreement with the calculated stoichiometric ones. The Mw/Mn values, reported in Table 1, fall within the range usually reported for RAFT synthesized homopolymers and block copolymers. A representative SEC chromatogram of 4000 g/mol PnBA and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock is depicted in Figure 1, highlighting the increase in Mw after the addition of POEGA. The Mw/Mn are narrow, monomodal, and almost symmetrical, with a minimal number of tails appearing at high elution volumes (in the case of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock), indicating an almost integrated reinitiation of RAFT polymerization and a nearly clean extension of the block sequence.
The compositions of PnBA-b-POEGA diblock copolymers were verified by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. A representative 1H-NMR spectrum of the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock is presented in Figure 2. The calculated composition values are also summarized in Table 1. All data manifest a successful and controlled polymerization process.

3.2. Physicochemical Characterization of the PnBA-b-POEGA Micelles

Detailed physicochemical characterization is provided for the assessment of CMC, size, shape, surface charge, and chemical structure of PnBA-b-POEGA block copolymers by means of FS, DLS, SLS, ELS, and ATR-FTIR techniques. CMC was determined using the FS technique by entrapping Py (fluorescence probe) into the micellar core of PnBA-b-POEGA copolymers [see Section S1.1, Figure S1, Supplementary Materials]. Both CMC values are listed in Table 2.
Based on the chain architecture and DLS/SLS data, the novel diblocks self-assembled into nanosized core-shell micelles in aqueous media with PnBA hydrophobic cores and a hydrophilic POEGA corona. A comparison of intensity weighted and monomodal size distribution plots of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 diblocks is presented in Figure 3a. The two symmetrical peaks indicate the participation of all chains in the formation of block copolymer micelles. Higher Mw of PnBA elicited an important growth in hydrodynamic radius (Rh), an almost sixfold higher scattered light intensity value (mass) and a rather increased aggregation number (Nagg, obtained by SLS) of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 diblock (red line) compared to PnBA30-b-POEGA70 (black line), introducing an increase in the total Mw of the system. The values of Rh, scattered light intensity, polydispersity index (PDI), and Nagg of the PnBA-b-POEGA diblock copolymers formed in aqueous media at C = 10−3 g/mL, pH = 7, and 25 °C are summarized in Table 2. ELS measurements of the PnBA-b-POEGA copolymers in aqueous media revealed slightly negative ζpot, as seen in Table 2, maybe due to the presence of carboxylic acid chain end groups from the CTA.
Chain length (L) values of the PnBA-b-POEGA diblock copolymers are also displayed in Table 2, as a measure of particle dimensions. The low values of L are in agreement with the Rh values obtained from DLS measurements, underlying the spherical core-shell morphology of the PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles and verifying the increase in total Mw.
ATR-FTIR measurements confirmed the chemical structure of the PnBA-b-POEGA micelles. Figure 3b exhibits the ATR-FTIR spectra of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles in aqueous media. Both spectra present the characteristic absorption bands due to the stretching vibrations of aliphatic C–H at the 3000–2770 cm−1 region; C=O stretching vibration at 1730 cm−1; −CH2 bending vibrations at 1455 cm−1, 945 cm−1, and 850 cm−1; −CH3 bending vibrations at 1355 cm−1; stretching vibrations of C–O–C at 1250 cm−1; and C–O stretching vibrations at 1107 cm−1.

3.3. FBS Interactions with PnBA-b-POEGA Block Copolymers

The lack of stability of polymeric biomaterials in a biological environment could induce dramatic changes in their synthetic identity as a result of recurring chemical/physical interactions between the polymer and the medium components. Thus, DLS stability studies of amphiphilic PnBA-b-POEGA micelles in FBS solutions were performed to detect possible alterations of their physicochemical characteristics in terms of size, PDI, and scattered light intensity. FBS simulates the physicochemical conditions of blood, and contains a variety of proteins, including a substantial amount (approximately 2.5 mg/mL) of bovine serum albumin (BSA). It is considered to differentiate/elucidate the properties of the micelles when injected into the human plasma [21]. A comparison of intensity size distributions of bare PnBA30-b-POEGA70 (red line) micelles and FBS (black line) is presented in Figure 4a. Protocol 1 [mixing of 50 μL sample with 3 mL FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v)] used for the preparation of protein–polymer mixtures is denoted in Figure 4b, whereas protocol 2 [mixing of 100 μL sample with 3 mL FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) and 3 mL FBS:PBS (1/1 v/v)] is denoted in Figure 4c,d. The physicochemical characteristics (Rh, PDI, Intensity) of FBS and protein–polymer mixtures with respect to both protocols are summarized in Table 3. The great heterogeneity of proteins in FBS elicited peculiar trimodal size distributions with peaks at about 4 nm, 23 nm, and 170 nm (Figure 4a, black line), underlying the existence of BSA at low values of Rh and larger size aggregates, respectively. The presence of characteristic FBS peaks in most DLS distributions is attributed to unbound proteins. After 1 h of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 incubation with FBS, DLS stability studies evidenced a coexistence of free proteins and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles (Figure 4b–d). No major interactions between PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles and FBS (for both protocols) were reported, as the overall size (Rh) of the micelles remained almost constant (10 nm) before and after mixing with serum proteins. The DLS stability studies of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles in FBS solutions are reported in Section S1.2, Figure S2, Supplementary Materials, whereas their physicochemical characteristics are summarized in Table 3.
In terms of scattered light intensity (Table 3), a significant decrease in FBS is noticed compared to the protein–polymer mixtures using both protocols [except for protocol 2 at FBS:PBS (1/1 v/v) ratio], implying a mass shrinkage of FBS aggregates in most cases due to the presence of the polymer. Indeed, the Rh of the third population of FBS at 170 nm (Figure 4a) reduced by more than half after mixing with PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles.
All data manifested weak interactions between FBS and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles. Collectively, DLS observations support the idea that POEGA hydrophilic chains shield PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles (described in SI) against massive protein adsorption and particle agglomeration. A schematic illustration in Scheme 4 highlights the interactions between PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles and serum proteins using the two protocols.

3.4. Physicochemical Characterization of the LSR-Loaded PnBA-b-POEGA Nanocarriers

DLS, ELS, ATR-FTIR, and UV-Vis studies were carried out to determine the physicochemical properties of the LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers, as well as to examine drug encapsulation into the polymeric PnBA micellar cores. The measurements were performed at 10−3 g/mL copolymer concentrations, pH = 7, and 25 °C. A comparison of size distributions of neat PnBA30-b-POEGA70/PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles and LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers prepared by the TFHM is provided in Figure 5. All data revealed symmetrical and monomodal distributions for all solutions, indicating the participation of all chains in the formation of micellar nanostructures. Apparently, after LSR encapsulation into PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, slightly broader size distributions were found at 20 wt.% and 50 wt.% drug concentrations, probably due to the expected increase in the hydrophobic content of the mixed/drug-loaded nanocarriers. In addition, DLS data evidenced a significant increase in size (Rh) and mass (based on determined scattered intensity from the solutions studied) of the LSR-loaded PnBA30-b-POEGA70 nanocarriers, indicating that the engulfing of LSR into the inner hydrophobic segments contributes to the formation of greater size drug–polymer nanostructures. DLS data highlight few detectable changes in the structural features of LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers in comparison with the empty ones. Specifically, a gradual increase in the size and mass of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers was observed (Table 4), implying the successful encapsulation of LSR into the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 polymeric micelles. The formation of lower mass and larger nanostructures is detected in the case of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles loaded with 20 wt.% LSR. As LSR concentration increased to 50%, even lower size aggregates were observed compared to bare PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles. Yet, the existence of LSR increased the PDI value of the PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers.
ELS measurements displayed strongly negative ζpot values (Table 4) as LSR concentration increased from 20% to 50% for both PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles due to the negative charge of the encapsulated LSR. The values of Rh, scattered light intensity, PDI, and ζpot of the LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers formed by TFHM in aqueous media are summarized in Table 4.
ATR-FTIR and UV-Vis measurements were pursued to examine LSR encapsulation into the polymeric core of the PnBA-b-POEGA micelles. A comparison of ATR-FTIR of neat PnBA30-b-POEGA70/PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles and LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers prepared by TFHM is provided in Figure 6a,b. A critical decline in ATR-FTIR intensity peaks is noticed after 20% and 50% LSR encapsulation, denoting significant structural changes in both copolymer–drug systems. Likewise, new characteristic peaks of LSR (green annotations) are clearly observed in the ATR-FTIR spectra of the nanocarriers. In both Figure 6a,b, the appearance of new characteristic absorption peaks at 1500–1650 cm−1 are correlated to C=C stretching modes, which are attributed to the phenyl rings and secondary amine N–H bending vibrations of LSR. Moreover, the absorption peaks at 1319–1330 cm−1 are probably related to C–N stretching vibrations of the LSR aromatic ring. The PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20%LSR and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50%LSR nanocarriers of Figure 6a introduce an extra absorption peak at 1000–1075 cm−1 compared to PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20%LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50%LSR of Figure 6b, which is attributed to the primary OH stretching vibrations of LSR [44,45]. All data confirm the existence of LSR in the mixed copolymer–drug aqueous solutions.
UV-Vis measurements further verified the successful encapsulation of LSR into the PnBA-b-POEGA polymeric micelles. Figure 7 presents the UV-Vis spectra of neat PnBA30-b-POEGA70/PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles and LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers prepared by TFHM in aqueous solutions along with the corresponding spectra of LSR in ACTN. In line with the literature data, the UV spectrum of LSR exhibits maximum absorbance at 205 nm, 225 nm, and 254 nm wavelengths [44,46,47,48,49]. However, the UV-Vis spectra of LSR, depicted in Figure 7a,b (black line), exhibit two characteristic absorption peaks at 260 nm and 228 nm. Given that PnBA-b-POEGA diblock copolymers do not absorb at the respective wavelength range in the UV spectrum, the presence of the two UV absorption peaks (254 nm and 228 nm) of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR/PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR (Figure 7a) and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR/PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% (Figure 7b) nanocarriers is attributed to the LSR UV absorption peaks. As LSR concentration increases to 50% (blue lines), an increase in the UV absorption of LSR at both wavelengths is clearly evident, highlighting a greater/stronger LSR encapsulation into the micelles. Notably, the detected shifting in the peak maxima may be related to hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding copolymers/drug interactions.

3.5. Stability Studies of LSR-Loaded PnBA-b-POEGA Nanocarriers

Stability studies were performed using DLS to estimate the temporal stability of the resulting LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA solutions over a period of 23 days. The Rh and scattered intensity measurements versus time (average of three measurements) of LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers are depicted in Figure 8. DLS studies on the mixed-drug solutions verified their stability in aqueous solutions in terms of size and mass. Specifically, the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR/PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers (Figure 8a,b), as well as the PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR/PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR (Figure 8c,d), do not exhibit significant Rh and intensity fluctuations, indicating stable nanostructures. Slight variations in scattered light intensity are present in the case of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers (Figure 8b), suggesting an appreciably stable drug–polymer system within 23 days. Remarkably, the mixed copolymer–drug solutions exhibited great long-term stability to the naked eye (approximately 2 years), as no visually detectable drug precipitation was observed.

3.6. 1H-NMR Studies on PnBA-b-POEGA Micelles and LSR-Loaded PnBA-b-POEGA Nanocarriers

Additional 1H-NMR studies on PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers were carried out in D2O solutions to investigate the aggregation behavior of the micelles and confirm the presence of LSR in the drug–copolymer solutions. Structural identification of LSR has been recited earlier in the literature [44]. The 1H-NMR spectra for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in D2O solutions are exhibited in Figure 9 and Figure 10. The black letters in both 1H-NMR spectra display the protons of the copolymer structure, whereas the red letters depicted in the 1H-NMR spectrum of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers show the LSR peaks. The 1H-NMR spectrum of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers displayed in Figure 10 shows the expected proton signals of LSR, verifying the successful loading of LSR into the polymeric nanocarriers. The chemical shifts of the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 proton signals in the absence (Figure 9) and in the presence of LSR (Figure 10) are summarized in Table 5. Additionally, the chemical shifts of LSR proton signals in the presence of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer and in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles are exhibited in Table 6, reflecting its great flexibility [32].
A shielding of the copolymer resonances is shown in the presence of LSR, evidencing the successful loading of LSR in the micellar environment. LSR chemical shifts are also driven to upfield values, reaching Δδ differences of up to 0.19 ppm, indicating its strong interactions with the copolymer structure.

3.7. 2D-COSY Studies on LSR-Loaded PnBA-b-POEGA Nanocarriers

The intramolecular interactions between the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer and LSR moieties and their internal structure were evaluated by 2D-COSY measurements. The 2D-COSY spectrum of the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers is presented in Figure 11, where the black arrows denote the protons of the copolymer structure while the red ones point to the LSR peaks. The cross peaks, noticed between the protons of the copolymer and the protons of LSR in the 2D-COSY spectrum in Figure 11, signify the intramolecular interactions and the structural elucidation of both copolymer and LSR.

3.8. 2D-NOESY Studies on LSR-Loaded PnBA-b-POEGA Nanocarriers

Τhe intramolecular/intermolecular interactions between the copolymer and LSR were further investigated via 2D-NOESY experiments for the verification of the successful loading of LSR into the polymeric PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles, and to study the spatial vicinities between the copolymer and LSR. The eminent correlations between PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and LSR moieties in D2O are juxtaposed in Figure 12. The cross peaks between the phenyl rings (8–9, 10–11, 12-13, 14–15) and butyl chain of LSR (1, 2, 3, 4) with the methylene signals of PnBA (c, d, e, f) are clearly evident (Figure 12), highlighting the strong binding of LSR with the PnBA hydrophobic core. Figure 12b illustrates the approach of LSR in PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles. Particularly, the correlations between the butyl chain (1, 2, 3, 4) of LSR and the butyl chain (c, d, e, f) of PnBA seem to be more eminent than those between the biphenyl ring (8–9, 10–11, 14–15, 12-13) of LSR and the butyl chain (c, d, e, f) of PnBA, evidencing that the hydrophobic interactions are mainly exerted by the butyl chain of LSR and the butyl chain of PnBA.

3.9. 2D-DOSY Studies on LSR-Loaded PnBA-b-POEGA Nanocarriers

2D-DOSY experiments were also performed for the determination of the self-diffusion coefficients D of the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers and the identification of drug association with micelles and the presence of assemblies. Figure 13 indicates the diffusion experiments for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers to certify the association of LSR with PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles. Particularly, two series of traces with low (D = 0.27 × 10−10 m2 s−1) and medium constants (D = 0.83 × 10−10 m2 s−1) are shown in Figure 13, and may be related to the diffusions of block copolymer micelles and unimolecular block copolymers, respectively. The trace with the highest constant (D = 4.24 × 10−10 m2 s−1) depicted in Figure 13, may refer to the diffusion of LSR, suggesting a rather high exchange between the free and the micelle-bound state of LSR.

3.10. 1H-NMR Temperature Dependence Studies on POEGA Homopolymer and PnBA-b-POEGA Copolymer

A systematic 1H-NMR study over a wide range of temperatures can reveal the mobility of protons during micellization, but, still, such studies are scarce in the literature. The 1H-NMR spectra of POEGA homopolymer, PnBA30-b-POEGA70, and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 diblock copolymers at three different temperatures are displayed in Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16. Detectable fluctuations in the integrated intensity of the proton signals of POEGA are observed in the 1H-NMR spectrum (Figure 14) with increasing temperature, which is an indication of enhanced proton mobility. The half-width of POEGA is decreased, while the integrated intensity of the proton signals fluctuates from 25 °C to 80 °C. Specifically, the integrated intensity of the proton signals steeply raises as temperature increases from 25 °C to 55 °C. The subsequent decrease in the integrated intensity of the proton signals for temperatures from 55 °C to 80 °C signifies a small decrease in its solubility, which may be exerted by the rupture of hydrogen bonds upon heating. The 1H-NMR peaks of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 diblock copolymers presented in Figure 15 and Figure 16 shifted with increasing temperature. At high temperatures (80 °C), the proton signals appear narrower and more intense, implying the enhanced mobility of the protons. The chemical shifting as a function of temperature of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 block copolymers is presented in Figure S4 in the Supplementary Materials to provide a clearer view of the shifting of the 1H-NMR spectra (Figure 15) to the lower field regions.
Apparently, the novel PnBA-b-POEGA copolymers are considered temperature-independent AmBCs, containing a biocompatible and rather hydrophobic easily deformable PnBA segment [50]. Based on the low Tg value (−54 °C) of PnBA [46,51], heating may trigger partial disintegration or increased fluidity of the polymer core matrix by inducing water penetration in the PnBA core, resulting in increased proton mobility. The effect of temperature on PnBA30-b-POEGA70 block copolymers was also investigated by DLS measurements to provide useful information of the overall hydrodynamic behavior of the globular structures. DLS data analysis details are presented in Section S1.3, Figure S3, Supplementary Materials.

3.11. Encapsulation and Ultrasound Release Studies

DL% and %EE were calculated by means of UV-Vis spectroscopy. The ultrasound-triggered release behavior of LSR from PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles was also considered. The highly stable PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers were hand-picked for the investigation of release kinetics, mainly due to the increased concentration of hydrophobic LSR (50%). The %DL and %EE values were calculated using Equations (2) and (3), and are summarized in Table 7. The highest hydrophobicity of the PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, emanating from the increased Mw of the PnBA block (7800), seems to favor the encapsulation of hydrophobic LSR into the micelles, resulting to a higher value of %EE compared to PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers (Table 7). Given that PnBA is not considered a highly hydrophobic polymer (taking also into account the low Tg value) [46] in combination with the low Mw of the PnBA block (4000), the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers exhibited low %EE, implying an inefficient loading of LSR into PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles.
The cumulative drug release percentage vs. time is provided in Figure 17 for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR (black line) and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR (red line) nanocarriers. The release profile of LSR started simultaneously with the application of ultrasound, exhibiting a gradual increase in released LSR within five hours during the release experiments. Based on the UV-Vis results in Figure 17 for both nanocarriers, an initial burst release of LSR is observed in the first ten minutes, followed by a relatively gradual increase of released LSR until reaching a plateau. The relatively low LSR release (Table 7) implies that a large portion of the encapsulated LSR is tightly bound to the cores of polymeric PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, and it is quite difficult to release.

4. Conclusions

Novel biocompatible PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 AmBCs were successfully synthesized in different Mw of the PnBA block using RAFT polymerization, and highly stable drug-loaded nanocarriers were developed through TFHM. The PnBA-b-POEGA diblocks and biocompatible drug-loaded nanocarriers (formed by the encapsulation of LSR into amphiphilic PnBA-b-POEGA copolymers) were studied using a wide range of physicochemical methods.
The PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 diblock copolymers self-assembled into nano-sized core-shell micelles in aqueous milieu. The engulfing of LSR into the inner hydrophobic segments of copolymers contributed to the formation of greater size drug–polymer nanostructures.
Likewise, FBS interactions with PnBA-b-POEGA copolymers indicated a good stability of polymeric micelles in a biological environment, endorsing the idea that POEGA hydrophilic chains shield the copolymer micelles against protein adsorption and agglomeration. DLS stability studies for the LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers suggested highly stable drug–polymer systems for a period of 23 days.
ATR-FTIR measurements verified the existence of LSR in the mixed copolymer–drug aqueous solutions by detecting new characteristic peaks of LSR in the ATR-FTIR spectra of the LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers. Moreover, UV-Vis experiments also confirmed the successful encapsulation of LSR into the PnBA-b-POEGA micelles.
1H-NMR measurements further corroborated the presence of LSR into PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles in aqueous media. 2D-COSY, 2D-NOESY, and 2D-DOSY experiments confirmed the internal structure of the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer and LSR moieties and documented the successful encapsulation of LSR into the micelles. Specifically, 2D-NOESY experiments evidenced the strong intermolecular association between the biphenyl ring and butyl chain of LSR structure with the methylene signals of PnBA. Interestingly, the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles exhibited enhanced proton mobility, probably caused by partial loosening of the PnBA hydrophobic core upon temperature increase.
The highest hydrophobicity of the PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles contributed to an efficient encapsulation of LSR into the micelles exhibiting a greater value of %EE compared to PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers. Release rates of LSR implied that a significant amount of the encapsulated LSR is tightly bound to both PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, leading to relatively low release.
The current study presents an overall physicochemical characterization of novel block copolymer micellar carriers, including NMR measurements, which can accurately detect drug–copolymer intermolecular interactions in the system.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym13071164/s1, Figure S1: comparative diagram of the calculated relative intensity ratio I1/I3 of pyrene peaks versus the copolymer concentration in water for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 copolymers; Figure S2: (a) comparative size distributions of bare PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles and FBS, (b) intensity size distributions of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) using protocol 1, (c) size distributions of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) using protocol 2, and (d) size distributions of PnBA27-b -POEGA73 + FBS:PBS (1/1 v/v) using protocol 2; Figure S3: Rh and intensity measurements as a function of temperature for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 block copolymers in aqueous solutions at 90 degrees; Figure S4: 1H-NMR chemical shifts as a function of temperature for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 block co-polymers

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C., T.M., and S.P.; investigation, A.C. and T.M.; resources, S.P. and T.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C., T.M., and S.P.; writing—review and editing, A.C., T.M., and S.P.; supervision, S.P. and T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Materials were supported by the National Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA). NMR experiments were supported by CERIC 20187056.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no competing interest to declare.

References

  1. Cabral, H.; Miyata, K.; Osada, K.; Kataoka, K. Block copolymer micelles in nanomedicine applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 6844–6892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; del Pilar Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S.; et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kowalczuk, A.; Trzcinska, R.; Trzebicka, B.; Müller, A.H.; Dworak, A.; Tsvetanov, C.B. Loading of polymer nanocarriers: Factors, mechanisms and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 43–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ge, Z.; Liu, S. Functional block copolymer assemblies responsive to tumor and intracellular microenvironments for site-specific drug delivery and enhanced imaging performance. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7289–7325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Martinho, N.; Damgé, C.; Reis, C.P. Recent advances in drug delivery systems. J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 2, 510–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jahangirian, H.; Lemraski, E.G.; Webster, T.J.; Rafiee-Moghaddam, R.; Abdollahi, Y. A review of drug delivery systems based on nanotechnology and green chemistry: Green nanomedicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2957–2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Trivedi, R.; Kompella, U.B. Nanomicellar formulations for sustained drug delivery: Strategies and underlying principles. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 485–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mohammadinejad, R.; Dehshahri, A.; Madamsetty, V.S.; Zahmatkeshan, M.; Tavakol, S.; Makvandi, P.; Khorsandi, D.; Pardakhty, A.; Ashrafizadeh, M.; Afshar, E.G.; et al. In vivo gene delivery mediated by non-viral vectors for cancer therapy. J. Control. Release 2020, 325, 249–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abasian, P.; Ghanavati, S.; Rahebi, S.; Khorasani, S.N.; Khalili, S. Polymeric nanocarriers in targeted drug delivery systems: A review. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2020, 31, 2939–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hill, J.P.; Shrestha, L.K.; Ishihara, S.; Ji, Q.; Ariga, K. Self-assembly: From amphiphiles to chromophores and beyond. Molecules 2014, 19, 8589–8609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Holder, S.J.; Sommerdijk, N.A.J.M. New micellar morphologies from amphiphilic block copolymers: Disks, toroids and bicontinuous micelles. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2, 1018–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Denkova, A.G.; Bomans, P.H.H.; Coppens, M.-O.; Sommerdijk, N.A.N.; Mendes, E. Complex morphologies of self-assembled block copolymer micelles in binary solvent mixtures: The role of solvent–solvent correlations. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 6622–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ashrafizadeh, M.; Hushmandi, K.; Moghadam, E.R.; Zarrin, V.; Kashani, S.H.; Bokaie, S.; Najafi, M.; Tavakol, S.; Mohammadinejad, R.; Nabavi, N.; et al. Progress in delivery of siRNA-based therapeutics employing nano-vehicles for treatment of prostate cancer. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Adams, M.L.; Lavasanifar, A.; Kwon, G.S. Amphiphilic block copolymers for drug delivery. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 92, 1343–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Han, G.; Ju, Y.; Zhao, H. Synthesis of amphiphilic block-type macromolecular brushes with cleavable pendant chains and fabrication of micelle-templated polymer nanocapsules. Polym. Chem. 2015, 7, 1197–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ivanov, I.V.; Meleshko, T.K.; Kashina, A.V.; Yakimansky, A.V. Amphiphilic multicomponent molecular brushes. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2019, 88, 1248–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Skandalis, A.; Pispas, S. PLMA-b-POEGMA amphiphilic block copolymers: Synthesis and self-assembly in aqueous media. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2016, 55, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ozer, I.; Tomak, A.; Zareie, H.M.; Baran, Y.; Bulmus, V. Effect of molecular architecture on cell interactions and stealth properties of PEG. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 2699–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Karanikolopoulos, N.; Choinopoulos, I.; Pitsikalis, M. Poly{dl-lactide-b-[oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether (meth)acrylate)]} block copolymers. Synthesis, characterization, micellization behavior in aqueous solutions and encapsulation of model hydrophobic compounds. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 1582–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pippa, N.; Kaditi, E.; Pispas, S.; Demetzos, C. PEO-b-PCL–DPPC chimeric nanocarriers: Self-assembly aspects in aqueous and biological media and drug incorporation. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 4073–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Palchetti, S.; Colapicchioni, V.; Digiacomo, L.; Caracciolo, G.; Pozzi, D.; Capriotti, A.L.; La Barbera, G.; Laganà, A. The protein corona of circulating PEGylated liposomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1858, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, J.-H.; Yoon, J.-Y. Protein adsorption on polymer particles. Encycl. Surf. Colloid Sci. 2002, 1, 4373–4381. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tziampazis, E.; Kohn, J.; Moghe, P.V. PEG-variant biomaterials as selectively adhesive protein templates: Model surfaces for controlled cell adhesion and migration. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sharma, V.; Blackwood, K.A.; Haddow, D.; Hook, L.; Mason, C.; Dye, J.F.; García-Gareta, E. Method for estimating protein binding capacity of polymeric systems. Biochim. Open 2015, 1, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Moad, G. RAFT polymerization to form stimuli-responsive polymers. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 177–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pellecchia, M. Solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques for probing intermolecular interactions. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Michel, M.C.; Foster, C.; Brunner, H.R.; Liu, L. A systematic comparison of the properties of clinically used angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists. Pharmacol. Rev. 2013, 65, 809–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Muszalska, I.; Sobczak, A.; Dołhań, A.; Jelińska, A. Analysis of sartans: A review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 103, 2–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kellici, T.F.; Tzakos, A.G.; Mavromoustakos, T. Rational drug design and synthesis of molecules targeting the angiotensin ii type 1 and type 2 receptors. Molecules 2015, 20, 3868–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kellici, T.F.; Liapakis, G.; Tzakos, A.G.; Mavromoustakos, T. Pharmaceutical compositions for antihypertensive treatments: A patent review. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2015, 25, 1305–1317. [Google Scholar]
  31. Peng, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, G.; Li, M.; Bratlie, K.M.; Cochran, E.W.; Wang, Q. Polymeric multifunctional nanomaterials for theranostics. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 6856–6870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zervou, M.; Cournia, Z.; Potamitis, C.; Patargias, G.; Durdagi, S.; Grdadolnik, S.G.; Mavromoustakos, T. Insights into the molecular basis of action of the AT1 antagonist losartan using a combined NMR spectroscopy and computational approach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1838, 1031–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Xia, T.; He, Q.; Shi, K.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, H.; Ma, L.; Liu, J. Losartan loaded liposomes improve the antitumor efficacy of liposomal paclitaxel modified with pH sensitive peptides by inhibition of collagen in breast cancer. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2018, 23, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hu, C.; Liu, X.; Ran, W.; Meng, J.; Zhai, Y.; Zhang, P.; Yin, Q.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y. Regulating cancer associated fibroblasts with losartan-loaded injectable peptide hydrogel to potentiate chemotherapy in inhibiting growth and lung metastasis of triple negative breast cancer. Biomaterials 2017, 144, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Coulson, R.; Liew, S.H.; Connelly, A.A.; Yee, N.S.; Deb, S.; Kumar, B.; Vargas, A.C.; O’Toole, S.A.; Parslow, A.C.; Poh, A.; et al. The angiotensin receptor blocker, Losartan, inhibits mammary tumor development and progression to invasive carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 18640–18656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Wong, T.C. Micellar systems: Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Encycl. Surf. Colloid Sci. 2015, 5, 4391–4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chroni, A.; Mavromoustakos, T.; Pispas, S. Biocompatible PEO-b-PCL Nanosized micelles as drug carriers: Structure and drug-polymer interactions. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chroni, A.; Pispas, S.; Forys, A.; Trzebicka, B. pH-driven morphological diversity in Poly[n-butyl acrylate-block-(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate)] amphiphilic copolymer solutions. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, e1900477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Papagiannopoulos, A.; Meristoudi, A.; Pispas, S.; Radulescu, A. Micelles from HOOC-PnBA-b-PAA-C12H15Diblock amphiphilic polyelectrolytes as protein nanocarriers. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 3816–3827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Skandalis, A.; Pispas, S. pH- and thermo-responsive solution behavior of amphiphilic, linear triblock terpolymers. Polymer 2018, 157, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chroni, A.; Pispas, S. Hydrophilic/hydrophobic modifications of a PnBA-b-PDMAEA copolymer and complexation behaviour with short DNA. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 129, 109636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Skvarla, J.; Zedník, J.; Šlouf, M.; Pispas, S.; Štěpánek, M. Poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide)-block-poly (n-butyl acrylate) thermoresponsive amphiphilic copolymers: Synthesis, characterization and self-assembly behavior in aqueous solutions. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 61, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Perrier, S. 50th Anniversary perspective: RAFT Polymerization—A user guide. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7433–7447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Al-Majed, A.-R.A.; Assiri, E.; Khalil, N.Y.; Abdel-Aziz, H.A. Losartan: Comprehensive profile. In Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 40, pp. 159–194. [Google Scholar]
  45. Goyal, R.; Nagpal, M.; Arora, S.; Dhingra, G.A. Development and optimization of fast dissolving tablets of losartan potassium using natural gum mucilage. J. Pharm. Technol. Res. Manag. 2013, 1, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zheng, Y.; Xu, D.; Tian, S.; Li, M.; Wang, W.; Liu, K. Polar poly (n-butyl acrylate)-g-polyacrylonitrile elastomer with high temperature elasticity and healability as flexible electronic substrate. Fash. Text. 2021, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pawar, H.A.; Lalitha, K.G. Development and Validation of a Novel RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Losartan Potassium in Dissolution Samples of Immediate and Sustained Release Tablets. Chromatogr. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 736761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Maggio, R.M.; Castellano, P.M.; Kaufman, T.S. A multivariate approach for the simultaneous determination of losartan potassium and hydrochlorothiazide in a combined pharmaceutical tablet formulation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 2949–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Antoun, S.; Gohy, J.-F.; Jérôme, R. Micellization of quaternized poly (2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate)-block-poly (methyl methacrylate) copolymers in water. Polymer 2001, 42, 3641–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Colombani, O.; Ruppel, M.; Schubert, F.; Zettl, H.; Pergushov, D.V.; Müller, A.H.E. Synthesis of Poly (n-butyl acrylate)-block-poly (acrylic acid) Diblock copolymers by ATRP and their micellization in water. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4338–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jakubowski, W.; Juhari, A.; Best, A.; Koynov, K.; Pakula, T.; Matyjaszewski, K. Comparison of thermomechanical properties of statistical, gradient and block copolymers of isobornyl acrylate and n-butyl acrylate with various acrylate homopolymers. Polymer 2008, 49, 1567–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration for the preparation of LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers using the TFHM in aqueous solutions.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration for the preparation of LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers using the TFHM in aqueous solutions.
Polymers 13 01164 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthetic route for the preparation of PnBA-b-POEGA diblocks using RAFT polymerization.
Scheme 2. Synthetic route for the preparation of PnBA-b-POEGA diblocks using RAFT polymerization.
Polymers 13 01164 sch002
Scheme 3. Chemical structures of (a) PnBA-b-POEGA diblock copolymers synthesized by RAFT and (b) LSR.
Scheme 3. Chemical structures of (a) PnBA-b-POEGA diblock copolymers synthesized by RAFT and (b) LSR.
Polymers 13 01164 sch003
Figure 1. SEC chromatogram depicting the synthesis steps of a PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock.
Figure 1. SEC chromatogram depicting the synthesis steps of a PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock.
Polymers 13 01164 g001
Figure 2. 1H-NMR spectrum for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 block copolymer in CDCl3, where the black letters denote the protons of the copolymer structure (ai). Insets are expansions of selected regions of the spectrum.
Figure 2. 1H-NMR spectrum for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 block copolymer in CDCl3, where the black letters denote the protons of the copolymer structure (ai). Insets are expansions of selected regions of the spectrum.
Polymers 13 01164 g002
Figure 3. Comparative (a) size distributions from CONTIN of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 copolymers at 90° in aqueous solutions using the TFHM, (b) attenuated total reflection Fourier transform (ATR-FTIR) spectra of PnBA-b-POEGA micelles in aqueous solutions using the TFHM.
Figure 3. Comparative (a) size distributions from CONTIN of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 copolymers at 90° in aqueous solutions using the TFHM, (b) attenuated total reflection Fourier transform (ATR-FTIR) spectra of PnBA-b-POEGA micelles in aqueous solutions using the TFHM.
Polymers 13 01164 g003
Figure 4. (a) Comparative size distributions of bare PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles and FBS (fetal bovine serum), (b) intensity size distributions of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) using protocol 1, (c) size distributions of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) using protocol 2, and (d) size distributions of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1/1 v/v) using protocol 2.
Figure 4. (a) Comparative size distributions of bare PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles and FBS (fetal bovine serum), (b) intensity size distributions of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) using protocol 1, (c) size distributions of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1/9 v/v) using protocol 2, and (d) size distributions of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1/1 v/v) using protocol 2.
Polymers 13 01164 g004
Scheme 4. Schematic illustration of the interactions between PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles and serum proteins using the two protocols (different FBS concentration in the mixed solutions).
Scheme 4. Schematic illustration of the interactions between PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles and serum proteins using the two protocols (different FBS concentration in the mixed solutions).
Polymers 13 01164 sch004
Figure 5. Comparative size distributions from CONTIN analysis at 90° for the (a) PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles, PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers, (b) PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in aqueous solutions using the TFHM.
Figure 5. Comparative size distributions from CONTIN analysis at 90° for the (a) PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles, PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers, (b) PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in aqueous solutions using the TFHM.
Polymers 13 01164 g005
Figure 6. (a) Comparative ATR-FTIR spectra for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles, PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers, (b) comparative ATR-FITR spectra for the PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR, and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in aqueous solutions using the TFHM.
Figure 6. (a) Comparative ATR-FTIR spectra for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles, PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers, (b) comparative ATR-FITR spectra for the PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR, and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in aqueous solutions using the TFHM.
Polymers 13 01164 g006
Figure 7. Comparative UV-Vis spectra for the (a) PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles, PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR, and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers; and (b) PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR, and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in aqueous solutions prepared by the TFHM.
Figure 7. Comparative UV-Vis spectra for the (a) PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles, PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR, and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers; and (b) PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles, PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR, and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in aqueous solutions prepared by the TFHM.
Polymers 13 01164 g007
Figure 8. Rh and scattered intensity measurements versus time obtained from DLS of (a,b) PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers, and (c,d) PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in aqueous solutions using the TFHM.
Figure 8. Rh and scattered intensity measurements versus time obtained from DLS of (a,b) PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20% LSR and PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers, and (c,d) PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20% LSR and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in aqueous solutions using the TFHM.
Polymers 13 01164 g008
Figure 9. 1H-NMR spectrum for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles in D2O solutions, where the black letters denote the protons of the copolymer structure (ai) and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Figure 9. 1H-NMR spectrum for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles in D2O solutions, where the black letters denote the protons of the copolymer structure (ai) and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Polymers 13 01164 g009
Figure 10. 1H-NMR spectrum for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in D2O solutions, where the black letters denote the protons of the copolymer structure (ai), the red numbers point to the LSR peaks and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Figure 10. 1H-NMR spectrum for the PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in D2O solutions, where the black letters denote the protons of the copolymer structure (ai), the red numbers point to the LSR peaks and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Polymers 13 01164 g010
Figure 11. 2D-COSY spectrum of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in D2O solutions, where the black letters (ai) denote the protons of the copolymer structure, and the red numbers point to the LSR peaks. The asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Figure 11. 2D-COSY spectrum of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50% LSR nanocarriers in D2O solutions, where the black letters (ai) denote the protons of the copolymer structure, and the red numbers point to the LSR peaks. The asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Polymers 13 01164 g011
Figure 12. (a) 2D-NOESY spectrum of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 +50% LSR nanocarriers and (b) the schematic approach of LSR in PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles. The black letters (ai) denote the protons of the copolymer structure, the red numberspoint to the LSR peaks, and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Figure 12. (a) 2D-NOESY spectrum of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 +50% LSR nanocarriers and (b) the schematic approach of LSR in PnBA30-b-POEGA70 micelles. The black letters (ai) denote the protons of the copolymer structure, the red numberspoint to the LSR peaks, and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Polymers 13 01164 g012
Figure 13. 2D-DOSY spectrum of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 +50% LSR nanocarriers. The black letters (ai) denote the protons of the copolymer structure, the red numbers point to the LSR peaks, and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Figure 13. 2D-DOSY spectrum of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 +50% LSR nanocarriers. The black letters (ai) denote the protons of the copolymer structure, the red numbers point to the LSR peaks, and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Polymers 13 01164 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of 1H-NMR spectra of POEGA homopolymer at various temperatures, where the red, green, and blue letters refers to the protons of POEGA homopolymer at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 80 °C, respectively and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Figure 14. Comparison of 1H-NMR spectra of POEGA homopolymer at various temperatures, where the red, green, and blue letters refers to the protons of POEGA homopolymer at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 80 °C, respectively and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Polymers 13 01164 g014
Figure 15. Comparison of 1H-NMR spectra of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock at various temperatures. The red, green, and blue letters refer to the protons of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 80 °C, respectively and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Figure 15. Comparison of 1H-NMR spectra of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 diblock at various temperatures. The red, green, and blue letters refer to the protons of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 80 °C, respectively and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Polymers 13 01164 g015
Figure 16. Comparison of 1H-NMR spectra of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 diblock at various temperatures. The red, green, and blue letters refer to the protons of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 copolymer at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 80 °C, respectively and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Figure 16. Comparison of 1H-NMR spectra of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 diblock at various temperatures. The red, green, and blue letters refer to the protons of PnBA27-b-POEGA73 copolymer at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 80 °C, respectively and the asterisk refers to the solvent D2O.
Polymers 13 01164 g016
Figure 17. Release of LSR from PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles in aqueous media under sonication.
Figure 17. Release of LSR from PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles in aqueous media under sonication.
Polymers 13 01164 g017
Table 1. Molecular characteristics of PnBA homopolymers and PnBA-b-POEGA block copolymers.
Table 1. Molecular characteristics of PnBA homopolymers and PnBA-b-POEGA block copolymers.
SampleMw a
(×103 g/mL)
Mw/Mn aMw a (PnBA)
(×103 g/mL)
wt.% PnBA b
PnBA-14.11.1--
PnBA-27.81.27--
PnBA30-b-POEGA7012.9001.294.130
PnBA27-b-POEGA7328.6001.477.827
a Determined by SEC in THF/3%v Et3N. b Determined by 1H-NMR in CDCl3.
Table 2. Results for PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles in aqueous solutions as obtained by DLS (dynamic light scattering), SLS (static light scattering), ELS (electrophoretic light scattering), and FS (fluorescence spectroscopy) techniques.
Table 2. Results for PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles in aqueous solutions as obtained by DLS (dynamic light scattering), SLS (static light scattering), ELS (electrophoretic light scattering), and FS (fluorescence spectroscopy) techniques.
SampleRh a
(nm)
PDI aIntensity a
(a.u)
Nagg bCMC c
(g/mL)
ζpot d
(mV)
L e
(nm)
PnBA30-b-POEGA70100.12167251.09 × 10−5−112
PnBA27-b-POEGA73240.159601331.26 × 10−6−725
a Determined by DLS at measuring angle 90°, b Determined by SLS, c Determined by FS, d Determined by ELS, e Calculated length of the fully extended macromolecular chain based on the total number of monomers multiplied by 0.254 nm.
Table 3. Physicochemical characteristics of FBS and protein–polymer mixtures obtained from DLS measurements based on the protocol used for their preparation. Data for Rh denote multiple peaks.
Table 3. Physicochemical characteristics of FBS and protein–polymer mixtures obtained from DLS measurements based on the protocol used for their preparation. Data for Rh denote multiple peaks.
SampleProtocolRh (nm)PDIIntensity (a.u)
FBS-4
23
170
0.505760
PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1:9 v/v)13
10
96
0.461032
PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + FBS:PBS (1:9 v/v)18
60
0.471061
PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1:9 v/v)23
10
80
0.491019
PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + FBS:PBS (1:9 v/v)24
17
0.47964
PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + FBS:PBS (1:1 v/v)24
17
120
0.493740
PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + FBS:PBS (1:1 v/v)2180.483880
Table 4. Results for the LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers in aqueous solutions.
Table 4. Results for the LSR-loaded PnBA-b-POEGA nanocarriers in aqueous solutions.
SampleRh a (nm)PDI aIntensity a (a.u)ζpot b (mV)
PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 20%LSR120.36116−13
PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50%LSR300.30215−23
PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 20%LSR280.19471−14
PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50%LSR220.22396−16
a Determined by DLS at measuring angle 90°, b determined by ELS.
Table 5. 1H-NMR chemical shifts of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer: (a) in the absence of LSR and (b) in the presence of LSR in D2O solutions.
Table 5. 1H-NMR chemical shifts of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer: (a) in the absence of LSR and (b) in the presence of LSR in D2O solutions.
1H-NMR Chemical Shifts (ppm)
Protons of the
Copolymer Structure
(a) Proton Signals of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 in the Absence of LSR(b) Proton Signals of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 in the Presence of LSR
Ha–b2.132.07
Hc3.943.89
Hd1.511.46
He1.341.28
Hf0.860.81
Hg4.174.11
Hh3.603.54
Hi3.283.22
ReferenceD2O: 4.69
Table 6. 1H-NMR chemical shifts of LSR: (a) in the presence of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer and (b) in the presence of SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) micelles in D2O solutions.
Table 6. 1H-NMR chemical shifts of LSR: (a) in the presence of PnBA30-b-POEGA70 copolymer and (b) in the presence of SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) micelles in D2O solutions.
1H-NMR Chemical Shifts (ppm)
Protons of LSR
Structure
(a) Proton Signals of LSR in PnBA30-b-POEGA70(b) Proton Signals of LSR in SDS Micelles
H10.630.77
H21.131.22
H31.321.5
H42.432.52
H54.354.39
H75.115.15
H8−H96.786.85
H10–H116.936.99
H12–H137.457.64
H14–H157.387.34–7.41
ReferenceD2O: 4.69
Table 7. Drug encapsulation and release characteristics of LSR loaded in PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles in water.
Table 7. Drug encapsulation and release characteristics of LSR loaded in PnBA30-b-POEGA70 and PnBA27-b-POEGA73 micelles in water.
Sample%DL%EE%Maximum Release Rate of LSR
PnBA30-b-POEGA70 + 50%LSR1617
PnBA27-b-POEGA73 + 50%LSR4255
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chroni, A.; Mavromoustakos, T.; Pispas, S. Nano-Assemblies from Amphiphilic PnBA-b-POEGA Copolymers as Drug Nanocarriers. Polymers 2021, 13, 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071164

AMA Style

Chroni A, Mavromoustakos T, Pispas S. Nano-Assemblies from Amphiphilic PnBA-b-POEGA Copolymers as Drug Nanocarriers. Polymers. 2021; 13(7):1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chroni, Angeliki, Thomas Mavromoustakos, and Stergios Pispas. 2021. "Nano-Assemblies from Amphiphilic PnBA-b-POEGA Copolymers as Drug Nanocarriers" Polymers 13, no. 7: 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071164

APA Style

Chroni, A., Mavromoustakos, T., & Pispas, S. (2021). Nano-Assemblies from Amphiphilic PnBA-b-POEGA Copolymers as Drug Nanocarriers. Polymers, 13(7), 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071164

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop