Effect of Organic Polymers on Mechanical Property and Toughening Mechanism of Slag Geopolymer Matrix
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials Used
2.2. Preparation and Mechanical Property of Organic–Inorganic Composite Geopolymer Paste
2.3. Sample Preparation of Organic–Inorganic Composite Geopolymer Mixture for Polymerization Reaction Degree Study
2.4. Sample Preparation of Organic–Inorganic Composite Geopolymer for the Polymerization Mechanism Study
2.5. Experimental Methods
2.5.1. Fluidity, Mechanical and Porosity of Organic–Inorganic Composite Geopolymer
2.5.2. Polymerization Reaction Degree Test
2.5.3. Polymerization and Toughing Mechanism Test
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Mechanical Properties of Organic–Inorganic Composite Geopolymer
3.1.1. Effects of Alkali Concentration and Modulus Ratio of the Alkali Activator on the Mechanical Properties of Slag-Based Geopolymer
3.1.2. Effect of Polymer Content on the Mechanical Properties of Organic–Inorganic Composite Geopolymer
3.2. Fluidity of Organic–Inorganic Composite Geopolymer Slurry
3.3. Porosity and Pore Size Distribution of Organic-Inorganic Composite Geopolymer
3.4. The Polymerization Degree between Different Functional Groups of Polymers and Hydration Products
3.5. Polymerization Mechanism of Organic Polymers and Slag Geopolymer
3.5.1. XRF Analysis
3.5.2. FT-IR Spectral Analysis
3.5.3. XPS Spectral Analysis
3.5.4. 29Si NMR Spectral Analysis
3.5.5. Morphology Analyses
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The addition of organic polymers in slag geopolymer showed general enhancement in compressive strength and flexural strength after the curing age of 7 d and 28 d. With the increase of polymer content from 1 to 7 wt%, the compressive strength and the flexural strength were increased first and then decreased. When the polymer was 5 wt%, the optimal mechanical properties appeared in the slag/KH570 paste with compressive strength of 129.31 MPa and the flexural strength of 10.88 MPa at 28 d. The incorporation of silane coupling agents (SCAs) and water-soluble polymers led to a general reduction of pore diameter and pore volume of geopolymer matrix which could improve its compactness. The addition of SCAs led to an obvious decrease in the fluidity of geopolymer slurry, while the incorporation of water-soluble polymers did not change the fluidity results. The fluidity loss ratio decreased with the addition of polymers, especially in the case of SCAs/geopolymer slurry. The organic polymers fixed most of the free water molecules and converted them into gel water which filled the pores between the slag particles to enhance the cohesion of the slurry. In addition, different chemical reactive groups provided more connection sites for reaction with C-A-S-H, forming a three-dimensional network.
- (2)
- The polymerization degree between different functional groups of polymers and hydration products was investigated from the quantitative analysis perspective. The chemical adsorption capacity of different organic polymers to hydration products of slag geopolymer by the liquid-state 1H NMR spectra was investigated. In the case of SCAs, KH570 exhibited the best chemical adsorption capacity with almost complete adsorption, followed by KH550 with 99.70% and KH560 with 71.00%. For the water-soluble polymers, PAA-Na presented better adsorption capacity, with 94.13% to slag geopolymer, than PVA with 90.60%. Therefore, methacryloxy in silane coupling agents and carboxyl group in water-soluble polymers may be attributed to the improvement of the C-A-S-H structure through the strong bond with the hydration product.
- (3)
- The specific chemical reaction toughening mechanism of polymers-reinforced slag-based geopolymer was investigated at the molecular and microscopic levels. The change of chemical environment around the [SiO4]4− tetrahedra was determined by 29Si NMR. Comparing the KH570/C-A-S-H with the reference C-A-S-H, a sharper Q2 peak and a longer mean chain length appearing at KH570/C-A-S-H indicate the aluminosilicate chain was longer because of the increasing degree of polymerization. The O-Si-O bridging silicon proportion of KH570/C-A-S-H with 75.18% was higher than that of the KH550/C-A-S-H (68.88%), the KH560/C-A-S-H (63.82%) and the reference C-A-S-H (51.85%). KH570 with methacrylic behaved best in bonding C-A-S-H gel particles in the series of silane coupling agents forming a three-dimensional network with a higher polymerization degree.
- (4)
- The spectra of C-A-S-H modified with the water-soluble polymer showed vibrational peaks of the C-O-Si bond at around 1136 cm−1, indicating that the condensation reaction occurred between the -OH functional group in PVA and the -OH in C-A-S-H. The formation of the Si-O-Si (Al) bond and the participation in the construction of the organic–inorganic interpenetration network structure were the main reason for the improvement of the flexural strength and toughness of slag geopolymer. PAA-Na/C-A-S-H and PVA/C-A-S-H showed a C-O-Si bond with 64.11% and 72.48% bridging oxygen, respectively. In addition, the acetate ions of PAA-Na reacted with the calcium ions of C-A-S-H to form 17.24% calcium acetate. PAA-Na with carboxyl group exhibited a better outcome in increasing the toughness of slag geopolymer as compared to PVA. In summary, the experimental results showed that PAA-Na with the carboxyl group had a higher polymerization reaction degree with C-A-S-H gel in the series of water-soluble polymers.
- (5)
- The research focuses on the qualitative and quantitative characterization of the chemical reaction processes between organics with different functional groups and geopolymers in order to establish a theoretical foundation for subsequent organic-toughening geopolymers. In the series of silane coupling agents (SCAs), the “X” group and the “RO” groups of silanes with a double bond and “−CH3” were selected to bridge the inorganic components which can promote the toughness of slag-based geopolymer. Additionally, in the series of water-soluble polymers, the “COO-” group was selected to improve the toughness of slag-based geopolymer.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pellenq RJ, M.; Lequeux, N.; Van Damme, H. Engineering the bonding scheme in C-S-H: The iono-covalent framework. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzano, H.; Enyashin, A.N.; Dolado, J.S.; Ayuela, A.; Frenzel, J.; Seifert, G. Do cement nanotubes exist? Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3239–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, P.K.; Monteiro, P. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Material; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hobbs, D.W. Concrete deterioration: Causes, diagnosis, and minimising risk. Int. Mater. Rev. 2013, 46, 117–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeldin, A.N.; Kukacka, L.E. Polymer-Cement Geothermal-Well-Completion Materials; Final report; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Akbar, A.; Liew, K.M. Multicriteria performance evaluation of fiber-reinforced cement composites: An environmental perspective. Compos. B Eng. 2021, 218, 108937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Gemert, D.; Czarnecki, L.; Maultzsch, M.; Schorn, H.; Beeldens, A.; Łukowski, P.; Knapen, E. Cement concrete and concrete–polymer composites: Two merging worlds. Cem. Concr. Comp. 2005, 27, 926–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heidari-Rarani, M.; Aliha MR, M.; Shokrieh, M.M.; Ayatollahi, M.R. Mechanical durability of an optimized polymer concrete under various thermal cyclic loadings—An experimental study. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 64, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeon, K.S.; Yeon, J.H.; Choi, Y.S.; Min, S.H. Deformation behavior of acrylic polymer concrete: Effects of methacrylic acid and curing temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 63, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, D.; Yu, J.; Wang, P. Molecular dynamics modeling of the structure, dynamics, energetics and mechanical properties of cement-polymer nanocomposite. Compos. B Eng. 2019, 162, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birchall, J.D.; Howard, A.J.; Kendall, K. Flexural strength and porosity of cements. Nature 1981, 289, 388–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birchall, J.D.; Howard, A.J.; Kendall, K. A cement spring. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1982, 1, 125–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popoola, O.O.; Kriven, W.M.; Young, J.F. Microstructural and Microchemical Characterization of a Calcium Aluminate—Polymer Composite (MDF Cement). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 74, 1928–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bortzmeyer, D.; Frouin, L.; Montardi, Y.; Orange, G. Microstructure and mechanical properties of macrodefect-free cements. J. Mater. Sci. 1995, 30, 4138–4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekincioğlu, Ö.; Özkul, M.H.; Struble, L.J.; Patachia, S. State of the art of macro-defect-free composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 10595–10616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desai, P.G. Cement-Polymer Interactions in Macro-Defect-Free Composites. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, H.; Le HT, N.; Wang, S.; Zhang, M.H. Effects of SCAs and SCA derivatives on cement hydration and mechanical properties of mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 129, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Gong, K.; Lu, J. Novel modification method for inorganic geopolymer by using water soluble organic polymers. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 1292–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Zhu, G.; Zhou, M.; Wang, J.; Chen, Q. Effect of Organic Polymers on the Properties of Slag-based Geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 167, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.C.; Yong, X.U.; Zhang, Y.J.; De-Long, X.U. Study on Toughening of Alkali-activated Fly Ash-based Geopolymer Modified by Acrylic Resin. Bull. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 30, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez, F.; Sobolev, K. Nanotechnology in concrete—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 2060–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Abdollahnejad, Z.; Miraldo, S.; Baklouti, S.; Ding, Y. An overview on the potential of geopolymers for concrete infrastructure rehabilitation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 36, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, H.F.W. Nanostructure of C-S-H-current status. Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 1993, 1, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuyama, H.; Young, J.F. Intercalation of Polymers in Calcium Silicate Hydrate: A New Synthetic Approach to Biocomposites? Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.; Lin, K.-L.; Cui, R.; Hwang, C.-L.; Chang, Y.-M.; Cheng, T.-W. The effects of SiO2/Na2O molar ratio on the characteristics of alkali-activated waste catalyst–metakaolin based geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 95, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM C109/C109M-16a; Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. Or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016. [CrossRef]
- Marcialis, A.; Massidda, L.; Sanna, U. Low temperature steam curing hydration of lime-fly-ash compacts. Cem. Concr. Res. 1983, 13, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bingöl, A.F.; Tohumcu, İ. Effects of different curing regimes on the compressive strength properties of self compacting concrete incorporating fly ash and silica fume. Mater. Design. 2013, 51, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walkley, B.; San Nicolas, R.; Sani, M.-A.; Gehman, J.D.; van Deventer, J.S.J.; Provis, J.L. Synthesis of stoichiometrically controlled reactive aluminosilicate and calcium-aluminosilicate powders. Powder Technol. 2016, 297, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 8077-2012; Domestic—National Standards—State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration CN-GB. National Standardization Technical Committee cement products: Beijing, China, 2012.
- Guimarães, D.; Noro, J.; Loureiro, A.; Cavaco-Paulo, A.; Nogueira, E. Quantification of drugs encapsulated in liposomes by 1H NMR. Colloid. Surface B Biointerfaces 2019, 179, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nadoushan, M.J.; Ramezanianpour, A.A. The effect of type and concentration of activators on flowability and compressive strength of natural pozzolan and slag-based geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 111, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soutsos, M.; Boyle, A.P.; Vinai, R.; Hadjierakleous, A.; Barnett, S.J. Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 110, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komljenovic, M.; Bašcarevic, Z.; Bradic, V. Mechanical and microstructural properties of alkali-activated fly ash geopolymers. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, G.; Zhang, M. Multiscale micromechanical analysis of alkali-activated fly ash-slag paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 135, 106141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukmak, P.; Horpibulsuk, S.; Shen, S.; Chindaprasirt, P.; Suksiripattanapong, C. Factors influencing strength development in clay–fly ash geopolymer. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 1125–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leong, H.Y.; Ong, D.E.L.; Sanjayan, J.G.; Nazari, A. The effect of different Na2O and K2O ratios of alkali activator on compressive strength of fly ash based-geopolymer. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 106, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, Z. Discussion on recent Development direction of concrete science and technology. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 1979, 3, 262–270. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.; Huang, H.L.; Wu, X.T.; Wang, X.B.; Hu, J.; Wei, J.X.; Yu, Q.J. Promotion on self-healing of cracked cement paste by triethanolamine in a marine environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 242, 118148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Zhu, G.R.; Wang, J.; Chen, Q. Effect of polyacrylic resin on mechanical properties of granulated blast furnace slag geopolymer. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2018, 481, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.J.; Du, M.R.; Fang, H.Y.; Shi, M.S.; Zhang, C.; Wang, F.M. Polymer-modified cement mortars: Their enhanced properties, applications, prospects, and challenges. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 299, 124290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Feng, J. Preparation and Properties of Alkali Activated Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer. Materials 2016, 9, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Simonsen, M.E.; Sønderby, C.; Li, Z.; Søgaard, E. XPS and FT-IR investigation of silicate polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Matsuyama, H.; Young, J.F. Synthesis of calcium silicate hydrate/polymer complexes: Part I. Anionic and nonionic polymers. J. Mater. Res. 1999, 14, 3379–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Leung, C.Y.; Tang, S.; Pan, J.; Huang, W.; Chen, E. Properties of rubberized concrete modified by using SCA coupling agent and carboxylated SBR. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersen, M.D.; Jakobsen, H.J.; Skibsted, J. Characterization of white Portland cement hydration and the C-S-H structure in the presence of sodium aluminate by 27Al and 29Si MAS NMR spectroscopy. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, R.J.; Bernal, S.A.; Nicolas, R.S.; Provis, J.L. Generalized structural description of calcium-sodium aluminosilicate hydrate gels: The cross-linked substituted tobermorite model. Langmuir 2013, 29, 5294–5306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Components (%) | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | SO3 | Fe2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slag | 37.12 | 32.06 | 14.84 | 10.77 | 1.67 | 1.14 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 1.15 |
Samples | Slag | NaOH | Waterglass | BaCl2 | Water | Polymer | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(g) | (g) | (g) | (g) | (g) | (wt%) | ||||
Reference1 | 4000 | 196.99 | 976.16 | 40 | 479.80 | 0 | |||
Reference2 | 4000 | 178.65 | 1314.38 | 40 | 396.10 | 0 | |||
Reference3 | 4000 | 161.60 | 1285.20 | 40 | 317.70 | 0 | |||
Reference4 | 4000 | 134.75 | 1392.05 | 40 | 262.70 | 0 | |||
Reference5 | 4000 | 53.87 | 428.56 | 40 | 772.50 | 0 | |||
Reference6 | 4000 | 107.69 | 856.72 | 40 | 545.10 | 0 | |||
Reference7 | 4000 | 161.60 | 1285.20 | 40 | 317.70 | 0 | |||
Reference8 | 4000 | 215.37 | 1713.37 | 40 | 90.70 | 0 | |||
PVA | 4000 | 161.60 | 1285.20 | 40 | 317.70 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
PAA-Na | 4000 | 161.60 | 1285.20 | 40 | 317.70 | ||||
KH550 | 4000 | 161.60 | 1285.20 | 40 | 317.70 | ||||
KH560 | 4000 | 161.60 | 1285.20 | 40 | 317.70 | ||||
KH570 | 4000 | 161.60 | 1285.20 | 40 | 317.70 |
Samples | Polymer Dosage a | Compressive Strength * (MPa) | Flexural Strength * (MPa) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 d | 28 d | 7 d | 28 d | ||
Reference | 0% | 63.73 ± 1.5 | 70.34 ± 2.1 | 4.21 ± 0.2 | 5.39 ± 0.4 |
Slag/PVA | 1% | 80.24 ± 1.2 | 83.35 ± 1.5 | 4.38 ± 0.1 | 6.22 ± 0.2 |
Slag/PVA | 3% | 92.32 ± 2.2 | 97.38 ± 0.9 | 5.34 ± 0.2 | 7.80 ± 0.1 |
Slag/PVA | 5% | 96.97 ± 0.9 | 110.56 ± 1.2 | 6.34 ± 0.1 | 7.64 ± 0.2 |
Slag/PVA | 7% | 95.33 ± 1.4 | 97.23 ± 2.3 | 5.45 ± 0.4 | 6.76 ± 0.3 |
Slag/PAA-Na | 1% | 75.80 ± 1.3 | 80.40 ± 1.6 | 4.59 ± 0.3 | 6.40 ± 0.3 |
Slag/PAA-Na | 3% | 80.56 ± 1.9 | 82.34 ± 1.6 | 5.78 ± 0.1 | 7.23 ± 0.3 |
Slag/PAA-Na | 5% | 100.67 ± 1.1 | 109.34 ± 0.7 | 7.24 ± 0.2 | 8.31 ± 0.2 |
Slag/PAA-Na | 7% | 82.32 ± 2.1 | 82.46 ± 1.1 | 5.26 ± 0.3 | 7.20 ± 0.3 |
Slag/KH550 | 1% | 90.56 ± 2.3 | 92.46 ± 2.1 | 5.34 ± 0.2 | 7.23 ± 0.5 |
Slag/KH550 | 3% | 95.67 ± 2.4 | 100.67 ± 1.1 | 5.46 ± 0.4 | 8.70 ± 0.3 |
Slag/KH550 | 5% | 116.57 ± 2.1 | 113.24 ± 1.3 | 6.81 ± 0.0 | 10.38 ± 0.1 |
Slag/KH550 | 7% | 100.28 ± 2.3 | 100.67 ± 1.3 | 6.32 ± 0.5 | 8.80 ± 0.1 |
Slag/KH560 | 1% | 66.68 ± 1.7 | 65.34 ± 1.3 | 4.22 ± 0.1 | 5.66 ± 0.1 |
Slag/KH560 | 3% | 68.43 ± 3.1 | 72.34 ± 1.2 | 3.28 ± 0.1 | 5.32 ± 0.5 |
Slag/KH560 | 5% | 76.16 ± 1.2 | 75.17 ± 3.0 | 4.82 ± 0.2 | 7.85 ± 0.3 |
Slag/KH560 | 7% | 66.79 ± 1.4 | 70.35 ± 1.6 | 4.10 ± 0.1 | 6.34 ± 0.5 |
Slag/KH570 | 1% | 98.34 ± 1.4 | 104.45 ± 1.1 | 7.56 ± 0.1 | 8.67 ± 0.1 |
Slag/KH570 | 3% | 100.45 ± 1.5 | 110.34 ± 1.5 | 7.81 ± 0.0 | 9.46 ± 0.1 |
Slag/KH570 | 5% | 124.99 ± 1.2 | 129.31 ± 2.7 | 8.56 ± 0.1 | 10.88 ± 0.0 |
Slag/KH570 | 7% | 108.67 ± 0.9 | 112.37 ± 1.0 | 7.12 ± 0.2 | 9.78 ± 0.1 |
Polymer | The Supernatant | The Elution Solution | The Chemical Adsorption Amount | |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 °C Water | 100 °C Water | |||
KH550 | 0 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 99.7 |
KH560 | 0 | 18.58 | 10.42 | 71 |
KH570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
PVA | 9.4 | 0 | 0 | 90.6 |
PAA-Na | 5.87 | 0 | 0 | 94.13 |
Specimen | The Actual Proportions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | CaO | Al2O3 | C/S | A/S | |
C/S = 0.8 A/S = 0.2 | 42.08 | 28.48 | 4.83 | 0.701 | 0.135 |
C/S = 0.8 A/S = 0.2 KH550 | 43.78 | 26.96 | 5.28 | 0.660 | 0.142 |
C/S = 0.8 A/S = 0.2 KH560 | 45.35 | 24.47 | 5.32 | 0.608 | 0.138 |
C/S = 0.8 A/S = 0.2 KH570 | 44.20 | 28.67 | 5.41 | 0.695 | 0.144 |
C/S = 0.8 A/S = 0.2 PVA | 42.63 | 29.90 | 5.07 | 0.751 | 0.140 |
C/S = 0.8 A/S = 0.2 PAA-Na | 37.97 | 29.16 | 4.42 | 0.823 | 0.137 |
Sample | Qn Cumulative Intensity | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Q1 (1Al) | Q2 | Q2(1Al) | Q3 | Q3 (1Al) | Q2/Q1 a MCL | Al/Si | |
C-A-S-H | 16.69 | 4.83 | 14.83 | 17.83 | 19.47 | 15.47 | 1.51 6.98 | 0.17 |
C-A-S-H/KH550 | 15.81 | 3.88 | 19.73 | 19.11 | 25.01 | 14.96 | 1.97 8.12 | 0.15 |
C-A-S-H/KH560 | 18.59 | 8.88 | 27.03 | 11.93 | 11.30 | 19.87 | 1.31 6.83 | 0.20 |
C-A-S-H/KH570 | 10.29 | 5.05 | 17.91 | 16.91 | 16.33 | 17.98 | 2.37 10.41 | 0.21 |
C-A-S-H/PVA | 11.13 | 6.38 | 32.88 | 15.7 | 14.63 | 14.09 | 2.77 12.14 | 0.14 |
C-A-S-H/PAA-Na | 17.23 | 9.01 | 17.36 | 21.65 | 9.59 | 13.22 | 1.67 7.78 | 0.15 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xing, X.; Wei, J.; Xu, W.; Wang, B.; Luo, S.; Yu, Q. Effect of Organic Polymers on Mechanical Property and Toughening Mechanism of Slag Geopolymer Matrix. Polymers 2022, 14, 4214. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194214
Xing X, Wei J, Xu W, Wang B, Luo S, Yu Q. Effect of Organic Polymers on Mechanical Property and Toughening Mechanism of Slag Geopolymer Matrix. Polymers. 2022; 14(19):4214. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194214
Chicago/Turabian StyleXing, Xiaotong, Jiangxiong Wei, Weiting Xu, Beihan Wang, Shunjie Luo, and Qijun Yu. 2022. "Effect of Organic Polymers on Mechanical Property and Toughening Mechanism of Slag Geopolymer Matrix" Polymers 14, no. 19: 4214. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194214
APA StyleXing, X., Wei, J., Xu, W., Wang, B., Luo, S., & Yu, Q. (2022). Effect of Organic Polymers on Mechanical Property and Toughening Mechanism of Slag Geopolymer Matrix. Polymers, 14(19), 4214. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194214